Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd
Upload
42 views6 pages

Cot-Rpms Teacher I-Iii Summary Rating Sheet Teacher: Sample Lang Po

Uploaded by

Christian Sabit

This document contains a summary rating sheet for teacher Sample Lang Po for the school year 2018-2019. It evaluates the teacher's performance in 9 criteria on a scale of 1-7 over 3 observation periods. The teacher received an overall final rating of 4.25, which translates to a quality rating of "Very Satisfactory" according to the RPMS interpretation scale provided. The teacher performed best in criteria 5 and 6, receiving ratings of 5 or higher in all observation periods for managing learner behavior constructively and using differentiated learning experiences. The lowest scores were in criteria 7 and 8 regarding planning and use of teaching resources.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt

Cot-Rpms Teacher I-Iii Summary Rating Sheet Teacher: Sample Lang Po

Uploaded by

Christian Sabit
42 views6 pages
This document contains a summary rating sheet for teacher Sample Lang Po for the school year 2018-2019. It evaluates the teacher's performance in 9 criteria on a scale of 1-7 over 3 observation periods. The teacher received an overall final rating of 4.25, which translates to a quality rating of "Very Satisfactory" according to the RPMS interpretation scale provided. The teacher performed best in criteria 5 and 6, receiving ratings of 5 or higher in all observation periods for managing learner behavior constructively and using differentiated learning experiences. The lowest scores were in criteria 7 and 8 regarding planning and use of teaching resources.

Original Description:

cot

Original Title

COT Summarywith Formula

Copyright

© © All Rights Reserved

Available Formats

XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

This document contains a summary rating sheet for teacher Sample Lang Po for the school year 2018-2019. It evaluates the teacher's performance in 9 criteria on a scale of 1-7 over 3 observation periods. The teacher received an overall final rating of 4.25, which translates to a quality rating of "Very Satisfactory" according to the RPMS interpretation scale provided. The teacher performed best in criteria 5 and 6, receiving ratings of 5 or higher in all observation periods for managing learner behavior constructively and using differentiated learning experiences. The lowest scores were in criteria 7 and 8 regarding planning and use of teaching resources.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
42 views6 pages

Cot-Rpms Teacher I-Iii Summary Rating Sheet Teacher: Sample Lang Po

Uploaded by

Christian Sabit
This document contains a summary rating sheet for teacher Sample Lang Po for the school year 2018-2019. It evaluates the teacher's performance in 9 criteria on a scale of 1-7 over 3 observation periods. The teacher received an overall final rating of 4.25, which translates to a quality rating of "Very Satisfactory" according to the RPMS interpretation scale provided. The teacher performed best in criteria 5 and 6, receiving ratings of 5 or higher in all observation periods for managing learner behavior constructively and using differentiated learning experiences. The lowest scores were in criteria 7 and 8 regarding planning and use of teaching resources.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 6

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region III
Division of City Schools
SAN JOSE DEL MONTE HEIGHTS ELEMEN
Block 1 Phase 3 SJDM Heights Project, Brgy. Muzon, City

COT-RPMS
TEACHER I-III
SUMMARY RATING SHEET
Teacher: Sample Lang Po

Observation Period
THE TEACHER:
1 2 3
SCORE TRANSMUTED SCORE TRANSMUTED SCORE

1. Applies knowledge of content within and across


curriculum teaching areas 6 4 6 4 6

2. Uses a range of teaching strategies that


enhance learner achievement in literacy and 6 4 5 3 6
numeracy skills

3. Applies a range of teaching strategies to


develop critical thinking, as well as other higher- 7 5 6 4 7
order thinking skills

4. Manages classroom structure to engage


learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful
exploration, discovery and hands-on-activities 7 5 7 5 6
within a range of physical learning environments

5.Manages learner behavior constructively by


applying positive and non-violent discipline to 7 5 7 5 7
ensure learning-focused environments

6. Uses differentiated, developmentally


appropriate learning experiences to address
learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interest and 7 5 7 5 5
experiences.

7. Plans, manages and implements


developmentally sequenced teaching and learning
processes to meet curriculum requirements and 4 2 6 4 4
varied teaching contexts
8. Selects, develops, organizes and uses
appropriate teaching and learning resources, 4 2 6 4 4
including ICT, to address learning goals

9. Designs. Selects, organizes, and uses diagnostic,


formative and summative assessment strategies 5 3 7 5 4
consistent with curriculum requirements.

Rater: Ratee:

Teacher
blic of the Philippines
MENT OF EDUCATION
Region III
sion of City Schools
HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Project, Brgy. Muzon, City of San Jose del Monte

COT-RPMS
TEACHER I-III
ARY RATING SHEET
School Year: 2018 - 2019

on Period RPMS Transmuted


Final Rating Rating
RPMS Interpretation (QUALITY)

3 4
TRANSMUTED SCORE TRANSMUTED

4 7 5 5 4.25 VERY SATISFACTORY

4 7 5 5 4 VERY SATISFACTORY

5 7 5 6 4.75 OUTSTANDING

4 6 4 6 4.5 OUTSTANDING

5 7 5 6 5 OUTSTANDING

3 7 5 6 4.5 OUTSTANDING

2 7 5 4 3.25 SATISFACTORY
2 7 5 4 3.25 SATISFACTORY

2 7 5 5 3.75 VERY SATISFACTORY

Approving Authority:

ZENAIDA B. AGURRE
Principal II
DON’T ERASE DON'T ERASE

3 1 5 OUTSTANDING

4 2 4.75 OUTSTANDING

5 3 4.5 OUTSTANDING

6 4 4.25 VERY SATISFACTORY

7 5 4 VERY SATISFACTORY

3.75 VERY SATISFACTORY

3.5 VERY SATISFACTORY


3.25 SATISFACTORY

3 SATISFACTORY
2.75 SATISFACTORY
2.5 SATISFACTORY
2.25 UNSATISFACTORY
2 UNSATISFACTORY
1.75 UNSATISFACTORY
1.5 UNSATISFACTORY
1.25 POOR
1 POOR
0.75 POOR
0.5 POOR
0.25 POOR

You might also like