Anxiety and Burn Out Staff Hemodialia PDF
Anxiety and Burn Out Staff Hemodialia PDF
Anxiety and Burn Out Staff Hemodialia PDF
he outpatient hemodialysis
T
Copyright 2014 American Nephrology Nurses’ Association
(HD) unit is a fast-paced, tech-
nological environment that Lee, V.L., & King, A.H. (2014). Exploring death anxiety and burnout among staff mem-
requires healthcare workers to bers who work in outpatient hemodialysis units. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 41(5), 479-
receive special training for the devel- 485, 518.
opment of a unique set of skills.
Patients who receive HD treatments Outpatient hemodialysis unit staff members are at risk for psychological stress, including
have been diagnosed with end stage death anxiety, unresolved grieving, and burnout, due to frequent interactions with chron-
renal disease (ESRD), are in a pro- ically ill patients who have a high mortality rate. Experiencing death anxiety and
gressively declining state of health, burnout may impair the ability to build interpersonal relationships, decrease job satis-
and have an average life expectancy faction, and impact quality of patient care. A quantitative study to evaluate the effect of
of 6.2 years (United States Renal Data educational classes on the level of death anxiety and burnout among hemodialysis care-
System [USRDS], 2013). Registered givers revealed a decrease in participants’ level of death anxiety and a decrease in emo-
nurses, patient care technicians, social tional exhaustion in one area that was directly related to the work environment.
workers, dietitians, and other staff Information from the study can be used to decrease psychological stress through educa-
members who work in HD units and tion and support for staff members who work in the hemodialysis unit environment.
provide life-supporting treatments
Key Words: Death anxiety, burnout, unresolved grieving, hemodialysis, end-of-
three to four times per week over a life care.
period of months or years often
develop close relationships with their Goal
patients. The intensity of work To provide an overview of the impact unresolved psychological stress, primarily death
required to prolong life in this patient anxiety and burnout, has on nephrology nurses and other staff members working in out-
population can cause frustration, patient hemodialysis units.
moral distress, compassion fatigue,
depression, and burnout in caregivers Objectives
1. Explore the effect of an educational intervention on the level of death anxiety and
burnout in caregivers who work in the outpatient HD environment.
Valerie L. Lee, DNP, MSN, FNP-C, is a 2. Discuss the benefits to nurses and other dialysis staff of receiving education
Doctor of Nursing Practice, St. Luke’s Clinic, about the life expectancy and complicated health issues of patients with ESRD.
Nephrology, Boise, ID, and has served as
President-Elect and President of ANNA’s
Sawtooth Chapter. She may be contacted directly working in outpatient hemodialysis whom they have had frequent interac-
via email at jLeeElec@aol.com tion in meaningful relationships. Job
units (Ashker, Penprase, & Salman,
Anita H. King, DNP, MA, FNP-BC, CDE, 2012; Dermody & Bennett, 2008; stress, emotional exhaustion, and cyn-
FAADE, is a Clinical Associate Professor, College Hayes & Bonner, 2010). The high icism can lead to job dissatisfaction,
of Nursing University of South Alabama, patient death rate can lead to unre- absenteeism, and a high rate of turn-
Fairhope, AL. solved grieving (Gerow et al., 2010) over among caregivers working in
Acknowledgements: Thank you to Dr. Micheal and death anxiety in caregivers who hemodialysis units (Flynn, Thomas-
Adcox for his clinical guidance through this proj- experience the loss of people with Hawkins, & Clarke, 2009; Hayes &
ect; to Dana Camacho, MBA, BSN, Group
Facility Administrator, for her assistance with
data collection; and to Richard Remington, MS, This offering for 1.4 contact hours is provided by the American Nephrology Nurses’
for his assistance with statistical analysis.
Association (ANNA).
Statement of Disclosure: The authors reported American Nephrology Nurses’ Association is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing
no actual or potential conflict of interest in rela- education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center Commission on Accreditation.
tion to this continuing nursing education activity.
ANNA is a provider approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, provider number
Note: Additional statements of disclosure and CEP 00910.
instructions for CNE evaluation can be found on This CNE article meets the Nephrology Nursing Certification Commission’s (NNCC’s) continu-
page 486.
ing nursing education requirements for certification and recertification.
Bonner, 2010; O’Brien, 2011; Wolfe, process, also known as death anxiety, Carpenter, and Bender (1992) found
2011). Staff turnover due to unre- can prevent a therapeutic interaction high levels of both work-related anxi-
solved psychological stress can affect between patients and caregivers and ety and death anxiety among care
the efficiency and morale of the HD can hinder the delivery of quality HD assistants who provided EOL care to
care team, and can lead to low quality and EOL care (Deffner & Bell, 2005, residents in extended care facilities. A
care, poor patient outcomes, Lehto & Stein, 2009). Nurses, patient study by Deffner and Bell (2005)
and decreased patient satisfaction care technicians, and other dialysis revealed that nurses who experienced
(Argentero, Dell’Olivo, & Ferretti, staff members who have not received a high level of death anxiety felt less
2008; Hayes & Bonner, 2010). This formal education about death, dying, comfortable communicating with
quantitative study was designed to or the grieving process may not feel patients and their families about
explore the effect of an educational qualified or confident enough to initi- death. A literature review of the con-
intervention on the level of death ate or participate in discussions about cept of death anxiety by Lehto and
anxiety and burnout in caregivers EOL preferences with patients who Stein (2009) emphasized that nurses
who work in the outpatient HD envi- are in a declining state of health are in a critical position to influence
ronment. (Hopkins et al., 2011). Providing edu- the level of death anxiety in individu-
cation and support can help these als who are nearing the EOL. These
important caregivers cope with death, influential caregivers may be reluc-
Defining the Concepts of Death
dying, personal loss, and the grieving tant or unable to interact with patients
Anxiety and Burnout
process while providing care to a pro- in a therapeutic manner if they are
Caregivers who experience death gressively ill patient population. personally experiencing a high level
anxiety have anxious thoughts or feel- of death anxiety. A study by Peterson
ings when thinking about or talking et al. (2010b) revealed that many
Literature Review
about death and/or the dying process, nurses and nursing students had a
or when interacting with someone In preparation for the study, a personal fear of death and experi-
who is dying (Lehto & Stein, 2009; comprehensive search for evidence enced an increased level of stress
Mallet, Jurs, Price, & Slenker, 1991; was performed. Studies of healthcare when providing care to dying patients
Tomer, 1994). These uncomfortable workers were reviewed that explored and their families. A study of nurses
thoughts or feelings may be due to the 1) the presence of death anxiety while who worked in the nephrology field
avoidance of discussions about death providing care to patients who are by Ho, Barbero, Hidalgo, and Camps
and dying in the American culture nearing the EOL, 2) the presence of (2010) revealed that a majority of
(Nyatanga & deVocht, 2006). With burnout while providing care to these caregivers found EOL care to
the focus of medical care in the patients who are receiving HD treat- be an emotionally demanding part of
United States primarily on prolong- ments, 3) the relationship between the their job. The nurses felt that special
ing life and avoiding death, many presence of death anxiety and the training was needed to communicate
nurses and physicians feel inade- presence of burnout, and 4) the influ- effectively, provide psychological
quately trained to provide high quali- ence of education on levels of anxi- support, and comfortably discuss
ty end-of-life (EOL) care or to com- ety, exhaustion, helplessness, job sat- EOL issues with patients and family
municate effectively with a patient isfaction, and patient care quality members. The study also revealed
who is dying (Billings, Engelberg, indicators. Several databases were that nurses who had an opportunity
Curtis, Block, & Sullivan, 2010; searched, including Clinical Evi- to verbalize their feelings with sup-
Peterson et al., 2010a; Schell, Green, dence, Cochrane Library, the portive peers had a more positive atti-
Tulksy, & Arnold, 2013; White & Cumulated Index of Nursing and tude toward providing care to dying
Coyne, 2011). Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), patients.
According to Maslach, Schaufeli, DynaMed, Google Scholar, Medline
and Leiter (2001), caregivers who are at Ovid, Nursing Reference Center, Burnout in Healthcare
experiencing burnout feel emotional- PubMed, and SCOPUS. Workers
ly exhausted, are indifferent or cyni- Many factors in the outpatient
cal toward the needs of other people, Death Anxiety in Healthcare HD unit environment contribute to
and have decreased satisfaction with Workers the level of psychological stress and
personal accomplishments. They are Providing care to patients who burnout in healthcare workers. Hayes
often inefficient in performing occu- are in a declining state of health in- and Bonner (2010) reviewed nine
pational tasks. They may also have a creases feelings of anxiety in health- international studies exploring the
high rate of absenteeism and fre- care workers. Mallet et al. (1991) stud- relationship between stress, burnout,
quently express intent to leave their ied hospice and critical care nurses and job satisfaction in nurses working
jobs. and discovered a positive relationship in the HD environment. They found
The presence of burnout and/or between emotional stress, death anxi- several environmental factors that
the fear of a patient’s death or dying ety, and burnout. Robbins, Lloyd, contributed to caregiver stress and
cipants were recruited from five out- Data Collection death anxiety, and a score of 8 per
patient HD units within a 60-mile Two pre- and post-intervention participant or 88 for all participants in
radius in southwestern Idaho and instruments were used to promote each category is the lowest possible
eastern Oregon. All dialysis units self-introspection and measure the number or level of death anxiety. A
were owned by a single dialysis cor- effects of the educational intervention paired t-test was used for each ques-
poration. Two HD units were located on the participants’ level of death tion in the four subscales on the
in a suburban area, and three HD anxiety and burnout. The Revised RCFDS and for each of the 16 ques-
units were located in small rural com- Collett-Lester Fear of Death and tions on the MBI to evaluate for a sig-
munities. Dying Scale [RCFDS] (Lester, 1994) nificant difference between the pre-
is a 32-item, five-point Likert scale and post-intervention scores.
Participants instrument that measures feelings
Forty-eight staff members from about the participant’s own death and Results
five HD units received information dying process, and the death and
and were eligible to participate in the dying process of other people. All participants were female. The
study. A total of 15 caregivers from Maslach’s Burnout Inventory [MBI] participants’ age ranged from 23
three of the HD units participated in (Maslach, Jackson, & Leiter, 1996) is a years to over 66 years, with the largest
some or all of the classes. Four of the 16-item, seven-point Likert scale percentage between 36 and 55 years
15 participants missed the last class, instrument that measures emotional (see Table 1). The level of education
did not complete post-intervention exhaustion, cynicism, and satisfaction ranged from a high school diploma to
instruments, and were not included in with personal accomplishments. The a bachelor’s degree. Three partici-
the study. subscales in the MBI provide a three- pants had previously taken a course
dimensional overview of characteris- on death and dying, five participants
Description of Educational tics of burnout. The general survey had been exposed to information
Intervention scale used was designed to measure about death and dying in college
The educational intervention participants’ level of burnout in direct courses, and three participants had
consisted of a series of four interactive relationship with their work. The never received education about death
classes that were presented once per questions address the level of engage- and dying (see Table 1). Participants
week in each of the three participat- ment and energy being directed included six registered nurses, one
ing HD units. Classes were presented toward work performance and the licensed practical nurse, two patient
for two hours in the late afternoon or level of confidence in participants’ care technicians, one dietitian, and
evening in the conference room of effectiveness at work. High scores on one patient care services assistant.
the HD facility. The class atmosphere the exhaustion and cynicism sub- Average scores from all partici-
was informal, with participants seated scales reflect a high degree of pants on the RCFDS indicated a
in a round-table format. Dinner was burnout. A low score on the satisfac- decrease in death anxiety in all four
served during each class. Staff mem- tion with personal accomplishments subcategories (see Figure 1 and Table
bers received no compensation for scale also reflects a high degree of 2). The average score for all partici-
participating. burnout. Question number five on pants in the subscale Anxiety Over
The class content was designed to the Emotional Exhaustion subscale, Your Own Death was 21.3 pre-inter-
include 1) a review of renal patholo- “I feel burned out from my work,” (p. vention and 18.2 post-intervention; in
gy, 2) a discussion of the concepts and 10), was determined by Maslach et al. the subscale Anxiety Over Your Own
symptoms of death anxiety and (1996) to be the strongest indicator of Dying was 29.4 pre-intervention and
burnout, 3) an exploration of the burnout. Identifying numbers rather 26.7 post-intervention; in the subscale
process of grieving, 4) a discussion of than names were used on measure- Anxiety Over The Death Of Others
effective coping and self-care prac- ment instruments to protect anonymi- was 24.2 pre-intervention and 22.6
tices, 5) a review of EOL legislation ty and promote honest disclosure. post-intervention; and in the subscale
and advance directive forms, and 6) a Anxiety Over The Dying Of Others
review of ways to participate in dis- Data Analysis was 24.6 pre-intervention and 20.9
cussions about EOL preferences with Statistical analysis was performed post-intervention. None of the mean
patients and family members. The on the pre- and post-intervention differences in each category was
final class allowed time for honoring instruments. The measurement of found to differ significantly from zero.
and sharing memories of patients death anxiety on the RCFDS is deter- The analysis of the MBI revealed a
who had made an impact on each mined by numerical calculations. The significant decrease in the mean score
participant’s life. Participants shared level of death anxiety in each of the (-0.36) on question number five of the
endearing characteristics and the life four subscales is determined by the emotional exhaustion subscale, “I feel
lessons they learned while interacting total number. A score of 40 per partic- burned out from my work” (Maslach
with these special patients. ipant or 444 for all participants is the et al., 1996, p. 10), after the education-
highest possible number or level of al intervention, with a 95% confi-
Participant 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Age
18 to 35 X
36 to 45 X X X
46 to 55 X X X X X
56 to 65 X
66 to 75 X
Exposure to Education on Death and Dying
No death/dying education X X X
Some death/dying education in college courses X X X X X
Took a course on death/dying X X X
Exploring Death Anxiety and Burnout among Staff Members Who SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
Work in Outpatient Hemodialysis Units Online Submission
Articles are free to ANNA members
Complete the Following (please print) Regular Article Price: $15
CNE Evaluation Price: $15
Name: ___________________________________________________________________ Online submissions of this CNE evaluation form are
available at www.prolibraries.com/nnj. CNE certificates
Address: _________________________________________________________________ will be available immediately upon successful comple-
tion of the evaluation.
City: _____________________________________________________________________
Mail/Fax Submission
Telephone: _________________ Email: ________________________________________ ANNA Member Price: $15
CNN: ___ Yes ___ No CDN: ___ Yes ___ No CCHT: ___ Yes ___ No Regular Price: $25
• Send this page to the ANNA National Office; East
Holly Avenue/Box 56; Pitman, NJ 08071-0056, or
Payment: ANNA Member: ____ Yes ____ No Member #_______________________ fax this form to (856) 589-7463.
• Enclose a check or money order payable to ANNA.
Check Enclosed American Express Visa MasterCard
Fees listed in payment section.
Total Amount Submitted: ___________ • A certificate for the contact hours will be awarded
by ANNA.
Credit Card Number: ____________________________________ Exp. Date: ___________ • Please allow 2-3 weeks for processing.
Name as it Appears on the Card: ______________________________________________ • You may submit multiple answer forms in one mail-
ing; however, because of various processing proce-
dures for each answer form, you may not receive all
Note: If you wish to keep the journal intact, you may photocopy the answer sheet or of your certificates returned in one mailing.
access this activity at www.annanurse.org/journal
Evaluation Form
(All questions must be answered to complete the learning activity. Longer answers to open-ended questions may be typed on a separate page.)
Nephrology Nursing Journal
1. I verify I have completed this activity. ■ Yes ■ No ______________________________________
SIGNATURE
Editorial Board Statements of Disclosure
2. What do you plan to change in your practice as a result of completing this educational activity?
In accordance with ANCC governing rules
_______________________________________________________________________________ Nephrology Nursing Journal Editorial Board
statements of disclosure are published with
3. What information, from this activity, do you plan to share with a professional colleague? each CNE offering. The statements of disclo-
sure for this offering are published below.
_______________________________________________________________________________ Paula Dutka MSN, RN, CNN, disclosed
that she is a coordinator of Clinical Trials for
4. What did you value most about this educational activity? the following sponsors: Amgen, Rockwell
Medical, Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Akebia
_______________________________________________________________________________ Therapeutics, and Dynavax Technologies.
Strongly Strongly Carol M. Headley DNSc, ACNP-BC, RN,
Disagree Agree CNN, disclosed that she is a Consultant
5. I was able to meet the objectives of this educational activity: (Circle one) and/or member of the Corporate Speaker’s
Bureau for Sanofi Renal, and a member of
a. Explore the effect of an educational intervention on the level the Advisory Board for Amgen.
of death anxiety and burnout in caregivers who work in the Tamara M. Kear, PhD, RN, CNS, CNN,
outpatient HD environment. 1 2 3 4 5 disclosed that she is a Fresenius employee,
b. Discuss the benefits to nurses and other dialysis staff of freelance editor for Lippincott Williams &
receiving education about the life expectancy and complicated Wilkins and Elsevier publishing companies,
and a consultant for Symplmed.
health issues of patients with ESRD. 1 2 3 4 5
All other members of the Editorial Board had
6. The content was current and relevant. 1 2 3 4 5 no actual or potential conflict of interest
7. The objectives could be achieved using the content provided. 1 2 3 4 5 in relation to this continuing nursing educa-
tion activity.
8. This was an effective method to learn this content. 1 2 3 4 5 This article was reviewed and formatted for
9. I am more confident in my abilities since completing this material. 1 2 3 4 5 contact hour credit by Beth Ulrich, EdD, RN,
FACHE, FAAN, Nephrology Nursing Journal
10. The material was (check one): ■ New ■ Review Editor, and Hazel A. Dennison, DNP, RN,
11. This activity was free of commercial bias. (check one – if no please comment) ■ Yes ■ No APNc, CPHQ, CNE, ANNA Education
Director.