Asset Form
Asset Form
Asset Form
The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact on environment that hasoccurred already with the
following objectives:
To assess the existing air quality.
To assess the extent of pollution of water bodies due to developmental
activities.
To assess the quality of soil and extent of soil pollution and soil degradation.
To assess the extent of noise pollution.
To assess the quantities and types of solid wastes generated, assess the
efficacy of present disposal method and to propose suitable methods ofdisposal.
To assess the amounts of sewerage generated and its quality.
To assess the efficiency of existing sewage system and propose sewage
treatment facilities.
To assess the existing biotic components in Pudukkottai town (flora and
fauna).
To assess the socio-economic impact of urbanization in Pudukkottai.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
This section reviews the various spects (Urbanization, Air, Noise, Water,
Soil, Waste water, Solid waste, Flora, Fauna and Socio-economic status) that arerelated to the
research work.
2.1. Impact of Urbanization
Maiti and Agrawal (2005) reported some of the important environmentalproblems caused by over
population growth and rapid urbanization process in themetropolitan cities of India. Total urban
population in India has increased more thanten times surpassing India’s total population growth,
which has increased less thanfive times during 1901 to 2001. Also, there was about three-fold
increase in thepercentage of total urban population in Class-I city followed by almost a fifty-fold
increase in the total population in the million plus cities in India from 1901 to 2001.Despite several
Government housing policies, 41% of the total slum population ofIndia is residing in million plus
city alone.A three-fold increase in the number of motor vehicles has been found inIndia in the last
decade. In all the four metro cities SPM was found highest alongwith the problem of solid wastes.
The noise pollution was noticed more than theprescribed standard in all the four metro cities. Five
and more person residing insingle room was faced by more than one fourth population of Mumbai
followed by alittle less than one fifth population of Kolkata and about 10% population of Delhi
and Chennai both. Also there is an acute shortage of piped drinking water in thesemetro cities.
India’s urban future is grave. Therefore there is an urgent need to tacklethe urban environmental
problem in a rational manner giving attention to the needfor improving urban strategies.
Between 2005 and 2030, the world’s population is expected to increase by1.7 billion people, from
6.5 billion in 2005 to 8.2 billion in 2030. Almost all growthof the world’s population between 2005
and 2030 is expected to occur in lessdeveloped regions. In particular, the projected population
growth at the world levelwill be primarily accounted for by the growth in the urban areas of the less
developed regions.That is, while the world population is projected to grow by 1.8 billion people
between 2005 and 2030, the urban population is projected to increase by 1.7 billion.The absolute
growth in the total population is lower than that of the urbanpopulation because of a declining rural
population over the next 25years (U.N.1993).
2.4.2. Pesticides
Run-off from farms, backyards, and golf courses contain pesticides such asDDT that in turn
contaminate the water. Leechate from landfill sites is another majorcontaminating source. Its effects
on the ecosystems and health are endocrine andreproductive damage in wildlife. Groundwater is
susceptible to contamination, aspesticides are mobile in the soil. It is a matter of concern as these
chemicals arepersistent in the soil and water (Joshi et al., 2004).
2.4.3. Sewage
Untreated or inadequately treated municipal sewage is a major source ofgroundwater and surface
water pollution in the developing countries. The organicmaterial that is discharged with municipal
waste into the watercourses usessubstantial oxygen for biological degradation thereby upsetting the
ecologicalbalance of rivers and lakes. Sewage also carries microbial pathogens that are the
cause of the spread of disease (Tyagi, 1998).
2.4.4. Nutrients
Domestic waste water, agricultural run-off, and industrial effluents containphosphorus and nitrogen,
fertilizer run-off, manure from livestock operations, whichincrease the level of nutrients in water
bodies and can cause eutrophication in thelakes and rivers and continue on to the coastal areas. The
nitrates come mainly fromthe fertilizer that is added to the fields. Excessive use of fertilizers cause
nitratecontamination of groundwater, with the result that nitrate levels in drinking water is
far above the safety levels recommended. Good agricultural practices can help inreducing the amount
of nitrates in the soil and thereby lower its content in the water.
2.5.2.1. Macronutrients
Six elements are used in large quantities and they are “nitrogen, phosphorus,potassium, calcium,
magnesium and sulphur”. Growth of plants may becomeretarded if these are available too slowly or
if they are in adequately balanced byother nutrients. Nitrogen, Phosphorus and potassium are
commonly supplied to thesoil as farm manure and commercial fertilizer.
2.5.2.2. Micronutrients
The other nutrient elements like iron, manganese, copper, zinc, boron,molybdenum chlorine and
cobalt are required by the plants in very small amounts.These are called micronutrients or trace
elements.
PROPOSED METHODOLOGY
According to the Federal Office of Road Safety's National In-Service Vehicle Emissions Study, if all
vehicles were tuned correctly there would be up to:
The study also revealed that on average, maintenance to polluting vehicles does not require the
replacement of major or expensive parts. Tuning is mainly limited to:
INTRODUCTION
Air quality plays an important role in occupational and environmental medicine and many
airborne factor negatively influence human health [1-6]. This review summarizes recent data on
car indoor air quality published by research groups all over the world. It also refers to formerly
summarized established knowledge concerning air pollution. Air pollution is the emission
of toxic elements into the atmosphere by natural or anthropogenic sources. These sources
can be further differentiated into either mobile or stationary sources. Anthropogenic air
pollution is often summarized as being mainly related to motorized street traffic
(especially exhaust gases and tire abrasion). Whereas other sources including the burning
of fuels, and larger factory emissions are also very important, public debate usually
addresses car emissions.
The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates 2.4 million fatalities due to air
pollution every year. Since the breathing of polluted air can have severe health effects
such as asthma, COPD or increased cardiovascular risks, most countries have
strengthened laws to control the air quality and mainly focus on emissions from
automobiles.
In contrast to the amount of research that is currently conducted in the field of health
effects, only little is known on specific exposure situations due to external sources which
are often present in the indoor environment of a car but not related to the car emissions.
The studies addressed a number of vehicular or non-vehicular sources.
CONCLUSION
The quality of the car indoor air may be improved by procedures such as window-opening or the correct
use of fans or automated air conditioning systems. In striking contrast to the multitude of studies that
address outdoor air pollution, only little is known about indoor air quality in cars. Therefore, modern
scientometric tools which are in use for the analysis of other research are not applicable in this area.
Factors that may improve indoor air quality in cars when used correctly.
There are numerous approaches present which may bring light to this field of environmental sciences. In
specifics, sources and levels of different substances need to be identified and analyzed. Then, further
research should be performed about mechanisms, i.e. with the use of modern techniques of biochemistry,
toxicology and molecular biology.
ANALYSIS
India is the 7th largest country in the world covering an area of 3.5 million square km and has a
population of 1.2 billion. According to 2011 census figures, 30 percent of India’s population lives in
urban areas and the rate of urbanization is growing steadily due to the push/pull effects of employment
opportunities and the declining viability of the agricultural sector. This, in addition to the fact that India
now has the 4th largest economy in the world - $4.463 trillion (2011 est.), has resulted in a large and
growing movement of goods, services, and people fueled by trade and employment opportunities – almost
all of which is powered by fossil fuels.
A growing demand of passenger and public transport has led to more air pollution and greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions. A study conducted by the Central Pollution Control Board (New Delhi, India) in six
cities – Delhi, Kanpur, Bangalore, Pune, Chennai, and Mumbai, concluded that the transport sector
contributes to more than 30 percent of the ambient air quality in these cities – either directly from the
vehicle exhaust or indirectly via the re-suspension of dust on roads due to vehicular movement.
According US Energy Information Administration, India's transportation energy use will grow at about
5.5 percent a year – significantly higher than the world average of 1.4 percent per year, more than
quadrupling the total energy use from the road transport in 2035. Likewise the per capita energy use for
passenger vehicles in India is estimated to increase threefold.
Besides major cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata, Bangalore, Hyderabad, and Ahmedabad, the
secondary cities (with population more than 2 million) like Pune, Surat, Indore, Bhopal, Nagpur, Jaipur,
Varanasi, Nagpur, Agra, Guwahati, Patna, Kanpur, Panaji, Trivandrum, and Cochin, are growing both
geographically as well as in population, putting pressure on local infrastructure.
The increase in traffic along with inadequate infrastructure facilities is responsible for higher emissions of
local pollutants and GHGs in several of these cities. While the message is clear; with the growing air
pollution and GHG emissions from the transport sector in cities and at the national level, regulatory
agencies will have to take a quantum leap, especially in terms of managing traffic in cities and freight at
the national level. They will have to implement radical solutions ranging from technical, social, policy, to
economic, within a short time-frame for long-term gains. This study focuses on the energy and emissions
outlook for the transport sector in India which could effectively result in a co-benefits framework for
better air quality management in the cities and a national climate policy dialogue.
The total registered vehicle fleet in India is 112 million in 2010 (click here for total registered vehicle
fleet by State for 2010). Of the passenger transport fleet, 2-Wheelers are very popular due to their cost,
fuel efficiency, and ease of use in congested traffic. All the vehicles (motorized and non-motorized) are
utilized for multiple purposes, for both passenger and freight transport, varying loading conditions, at all
terrains from high altitude Kashmir to the plains of Tamilnadu and Kerala. While the total vehicle
numbers have increased significantly between 1990 and 2010, the per capita rate of ownership of private
cars in India is still lower than many of the European Nations, United States, and Canada. As incomes
rise, car ownership will increase proportionately and consequently the total emissions and pollution. We
estimate that the total fleet will increase to 500 to 600 million by 2030, based on low and high sales
growth projections, with major of the passenger fleet concentrated in the urban centers.
The emissions inventory is built for the following pollutants – particulates in two bins (PM10, PM2.5),
sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOC),
black carbon (BC), organic carbon (OC) and Carbon Dioxide (CO2), for the period of 2010 to 2030 under
the business as usual and some control scenarios (click here for total emissions by State and by pollutant
for 2010)
Emissions from the transport sector are a result of multiple factors - including but not limited to, vehicle
fuel standards, badly maintained roads and public transport vehicles, lack of transportation and urban
planning, adulterated fuel, aging fleet, and freight movement. There cannot be a silver bullet to address
this issue and one cannot have an impact on emissions from transport using only one policy instrument.
For instance improving vehicle standards by itself will not reduce pollution, unless it is accompanied by a
host of other complementing policies. While technological improvements and stricter emission standards
will decrease the on-road emissions, factors such as a greater number of vehicles (diesel fueled in
particular), the large number of short trips and traffic congestion – may offset the benefits derived from
these improvements. A summary of results from business as usual and assumed “what-if” scenarios is
presented below.
It is assumed that the actual emissions in 2030 could be anywhere between the red line (business as usual
- BAU) and the dotted black line (LE5-15UPT = lower sales projections with introduction of Bharat 5
(equivalent of Euro 5) standards by 2015, with an aggressive urban passenger transport policy to promote
public transport and non-motorized transport, in order to reduce 25 percent of the vehicle kilometers
traveled from passenger vehicles).
The total emissions are further gridded to a spatial resolution of 0.25° grid size covering an area between
7°N to 39°N in latitude and 37°E to 99°E in longitude, utilizing (a) gridded population (b) gridded road
density maps (c) activity maps like ports and airports that are hot spots to freight movement (d) urban
center locations that are hot spots to the passenger travel (e) landuse maps distinguishing populated,
agricultural, mining, and forest areas. These layers of information, along with modeling results are present
in the panel of maps.
RELEVANCE
The large majority of today's cars and trucks travel by using internal combustion engines that burn
gasoline or other fossil fuels. The process of burning gasoline to power cars and trucks contributes to air
pollution by releasing a variety of emissions into the atmosphere. Emissions that are released directly into
the atmosphere from the tailpipes of cars and trucks are the primary source of vehicular pollution. But
motor vehicles also pollute the air during the processes of manufacturing, refueling, and from the
emissions associated with oil refining and distribution of the fuel they burn.
Primary pollution from motor vehicles is pollution that is emitted directly into the atmosphere, whereas
secondary pollution results from chemical reactions between pollutants after they have been released into
the air.
While new cars and light trucks emit about 90 percent fewer pollutants than they did three decades ago,
total annual vehicle-miles driven have increased by more than 140 percent since 1970 and are expected to
increase another 25 percent by 2010. The emission reductions from individual vehicles have not
adequately kept pace with the increase in miles driven and the market trend toward more-polluting light
trucks, a category that includes sports utility vehicles (SUVs). As a result, cars and light trucks are still
the largest single source of air pollution in most urban areas, accounting for one quarter of emissions of
smog-forming pollutants nationwide. Carbon monoxide, ozone, particulate matter, and the other forms of
pollution listed above can cause smog and other air quality concerns, but there are vehicular emissions
that contribute to a completely different pollution issue: global warming. The gases that contribute to
global warming are related to the chemical composition of the Earth's atmosphere. Some of the gases in
the atmosphere function like the panes of a greenhouse. They let some radiation (heat) in from the sun but
do not let it all back out, thereby helping to keep the Earth warm. The past century has seen a dramatic
increase in the atmospheric concentration of heat-trapping gasses, due to human activity. If this trend
continues, scientists project that the earth's average surface temperature will increase between 2.5°F and
10.4°F by the year 2100. Vehicular emissions that contribute to air quality problems, smog, and global
warming can be reduced by putting better pollution-control technologies on cars and trucks, burning less
fuel, switching to cleaner fuels, using technologies that reduce or eliminate emissions, and reducing the
number of vehicle-miles traveled.
Federal and California regulations require the use of technologies that have dramatically reduced the
amount of smog-forming pollution and carbon monoxide coming from a vehicle's tailpipe. For gasoline
vehicles, "threeway" catalysts, precise engine and fuel controls, and evaporative emission controls have
been quite successful. More advanced versions of these technologies are in some cars and can reduce
smog-forming emissions from new vehicles by a factor of ten. For diesel vehicles, "two-way" catalysts
and engine controls have been able to reduce hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions, but nitrogen
oxide and toxic particulate-matter emissions remain very high. More advanced diesel-control technologies
are under development, but it is unlikely that they will be able to clean up diesel to the degree already
achieved in the cleanest gasoline vehicles. Added concerns surround the difference between new vehicle
emissions and the emissions of a car or truck over a lifetime of actual use. Vehicles with good emission-
control technology that is not properly maintained can become "gross polluters" that are responsible for a
significant amount of existing air-quality problems. New technologies have also been developed to
identify emission-equipment control failures, and can be used to help reduce the "gross polluter" problem.
The key to burning less fuel is making cars and trucks more efficient and putting that efficiency to work
in improving fuel economy. The U.S. federal government sets a fuel-economy standard for all passenger
vehicles. However, these standards have remained mostly constant for the past decade. In addition, sales
of lower-fuel-economy light trucks, such as SUVs, pickups, and minivans, have increased dramatically.
As a result, on average, the U.S. passenger-vehicle fleet actually travels less distance on a gallon of gas
than it did twenty years ago. This has led to an increase in heat-trapping gas emissions from cars and
trucks and to an increase in smog-forming and toxic emissions resulting from the production and
transportation of gasoline to the fuel pump. This trend can be reversed through the use of existing
technologies that help cars and trucks go farther on a gallon of gasoline. These include more efficient
engines and transmissions, improved aerodynamics, better tires, and high strength steel and aluminum.
More advanced technologies, such as hybrid-electric vehicles that use a gasoline engine and an electric
motor plus a battery, can cut fuel use even further. These technologies carry with them additional costs,
but pay for themselves through savings at the gasoline pump.
Cleaner Fuels
The gasoline and diesel fuel in use today contains significant amounts of sulfur and other compounds that
make it harder for existing control technology to keep vehicles clean. Removing the sulfur from the fuel
and cutting down on the amount of light hydrocarbons helps pollution-control technology to work better
and cuts down on evaporative and refueling emissions.
Further large-scale reductions of other tailpipe pollution and CO 2 can be accomplished with a shift away
from conventional fuels. Alternative fuels such as natural gas, methanol, ethanol, and hydrogen can
deliver benefits to the environment while helping to move the United States away from its dependence on
oil. All of these fuels inherently burn cleaner than diesel and gasoline, and they have a lower carbon
content—resulting in less CO 2 . Most of these fuels are also more easily made from renewable resources,
and fuels such as natural gas and methanol help provide a bridge to producing hydrogen for fuel-cell
vehicles.
Reducing Driving
Because we are still dependent on fossil fuels and the number of cars on the road is expected to double, a
significant reduction in vehicular pollution requires more than gains in fuel efficiency. Measures that
encourage us to drive less can help curb vehicular pollution and protect natural resources and public
health. Alternatives that can reduce the number of vehicle-miles traveled include:
providing transportation alternatives to cars, including mass transit, bicycle, and pedestrian
routes;
promoting transit-oriented, compact developments in and around cities and towns; and adopting
policies to improve existing roads and infrastructure.
Personal Contributions
Individuals can also make a difference in the effort to reduce pollution from cars and trucks. How we
drive and how we take care of our vehicles affects fuel economy and pollution emissions. The following
are several ways people can reduce the harmful environmental impact of cars.
Driving as little as possible is the best way to reduce the harmful environmental impact of
transportation needs. Carpooling, mass transit, biking, and walking are ways to limit the number
of miles we drive. Choosing a place to live that reduces the need to drive is another way.
Driving moderately and avoiding high-speed driving and frequent stopping and starting can
reduce both fuel use and pollutant emissions.
Simple vehicle maintenance—such as regular oil changes, air-filter changes, and spark plug
replacements—can lengthen the life of your car as well as improve fuel economy and minimize
emissions.
Keeping tires properly inflated saves fuel by reducing the amount of drag a car's engine must
overcome.
During start-up, a car's engine burns extra gasoline. However, letting an engine idle for more than
a minute burns more fuel than turning off the engine and restarting it.
During warm periods with strong sunlight, parking in the shade keeps a car cooler and can
minimize the evaporation of fuel.