INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: JOSEPH S. JUNIO Name of Rater:

Position: TEACHER I Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: CAUAYAN CITY Date of Review:
Rating Period: JUNE 2018 - MARCH 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality
Services Knowledge and knowledge of
Pedagogy content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge
across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within
and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
7.5%
of 7 of 6 of 5
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using
Services of teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading
achievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2

learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given given

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different
Services of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical
develop critical and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills
thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
7.5%
 thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality
Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
Services Environment classroom
management management management
and Diversity of structure to
strategies that strategies that strategies that
Learners engage learners,
engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in
activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
groups, in
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
meanigful
exploration, 7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
discovery and Efficiency
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
hands-on lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
activities within a by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
range of physical 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
learning acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
environments. Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher
Services learner behavior management management management
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4

of the given of the given of the given
strategies as strategies as strategies as
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2
4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 6. Used Quality Applied Applied
Applied
Services differentiated, differentiated differentiated
differentiated
developmentally teaching strategies teaching strategies
teaching strategies
appropriate to address learner to address learner
to address learner
learning diversity as shown diversity as shown
diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 rating of 5
gender, needs, rating of 6
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated
7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
experiences.
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
 acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
processes to with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
meet curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
varied teaching 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally
contexts. sequenced sequenced sequenced
teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as learning process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services collegial participated in participated in participated in
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
7.5% submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2

least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and
Services developed, used varied used varied used varied
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5
goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied
7.5%
teaching and teaching and
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning resources,
 goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied
7.5%
teaching and teaching and
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning resources,
varied teaching and including ICT, as including ICT, as
learning resources, evidently shown in evidently shown in
including ICT, as MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
evidently shown in supported by any 1 supported by any 1
MOV 1 and of the acceptable of the acceptable
supported by any 1 MOV MOV
of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected,
Services and Reporting selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic,
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative
summative assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5%
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied

varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and
progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner
achievement progress and progress and progress and
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters
 Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally
Services ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and
clearly the clear communication of clear
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs,
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders,
guardians. including parents/ guardians as including parents/
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as
7.5% shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services various related performed various performed various performed various
works/activities related related related
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning
process as shown process as shown process as shown
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2

different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory JOSEPH S. JUNIO FELISA P
below 1.499 Poor Ratee R
MENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
FELISA P. PASCUA
MASTER TEACHER I

ING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.337
evidence was
Showed knowledge shown
of content and its
integration within
and across subject
areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 4
Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
the given MOV evidence was
shown

Facilitated using No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.3

different teaching evidence was
strategies that shown
promote reading
writing and/or
numeracy skills as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
learner-centered evidence was
lessons as shown
evidently shown in
any of the other
given MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Used different No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.300
teaching strategies evidence was
that develop critical shown
and creative
thinking skills
and/or other HOTS
as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4
 and/or other HOTS
as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

as evidenced by evidence was
any of the other shown
given MOV

No acceptable 5 4 4.500 0.337

Used classroom evidence was
management shown
strategies that
engage learners in
activities/tasks as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
supported by any of evidence was
the acceptable shown
MOV

Applied teacher No acceptable 5 4 4.500 0.337

management evidence was
strategies of learner shown
behavior that
promote positive
and non-violent
discipline as shown
in MOV submitted
with a rating of 4

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

the given strategies evidence was
as observed in only shown
1 lesson

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Applied No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.337
differentiated evidence was
teaching strategies shown
to address learner
diversity as shown
in MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

Submitted any 1 No acceptable

differentiated evidence was
teaching strategy in shown
only 1 lesson as
evidently shown in
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
 Planned and No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.337
implemented evidence was
developmentally shown
sequenced
teaching and
learning process as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
developmentally evidence was
sequenced shown
teaching and
learning process as
evidently shown in
any 1 of the given
MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely participated No acceptable 5 4 4.500 0.337
in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
meeting to discuss shown
teacher/learner
feedback to enrich
instruction as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Participated in 1 No acceptable
LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was
as evidently shown shown
in any 1 of the
given MOV

Developed and No acceptable 5 4 4.500 0.337

used varied evidence was
teaching and shown
learning resources,
including ICT, to
address learning
goals as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 4

Submitted any No acceptable

teaching and evidence was
learning resource, shown
 Submitted any No acceptable
teaching and evidence was
learning resource, shown
including ICT, as
evidently shown in
any of the
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Designed, selected, No acceptable 4 5 4.5 0.337
organized and used evidence was
diagnostic, shown
formative and
summative
assessment
strategies
consistent with
curriculum
requirements as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment tool as evidence was
evidently shown in shown
any of the
acceptable MOV

Rarely monitored No acceptable 4 5 4 4.333 0.324

and evaluated evidence was
learner progress shown
and achievement
using learner
attainment data as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
acceptable MOV evidence was
shown

Submitted MOV No acceptable

was completed in evidence was
only 1 quarter shown
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely showed No acceptable 5 5 5 5 0.375
prompt and clear evidence was
communication of shown
the learners’ needs,
progress and
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

the given MOV evidence was
shown

Submitted MOV No acceptable

was completed in evidence was
only 1 quarter shown
Rarely performed No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.500
various related evidence was
work/activities that shown
contribute to the
teaching learning
process as shown
in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

the acceptable evidence was
MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL

Very Satisfactory 4.495
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

FELISA P. PASCUA EDDIE C. REYES

Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPC
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: JOSEPH S. JUNIO

Position: TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: CAUAYAN CITY
Rating Period: JUNE 2018 - MARCH 2019

Weight per Weight per Numerical

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 4
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4
Objective 3 7.5% 4
Objective 4 7.5% 5
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 5
Objective 6 7.5% 4
Objective 7 7.5% 4
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5
Objective 9 7.5% 5
Objective 10 7.5% 4
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 4
Objective 12 7.5% 5
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5

JOSEPH S. JUNIO FELISA P. PASCUA

Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
ient Teacher)

Name of Rater: FELISA P. PASCUA

Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
5 4.500 0.337
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.500 0.337
4 4.500 0.337
5 4.500 0.337
5 4.500 0.337
4 4.500 0.337
4 4.500 0.337
5 4.500 0.337
5 4 4.333 0.324
5 5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.500
Final Rating Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 4.495

ELISA P. PASCUA EDDIE C. REYES

Rater Approving Authority