Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
CARAGA Region
Division of Surigao del Sur
QUEZON INTEGRATED SCHOOL
Quezon, Tagbina, Surigao del Sur

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: WENELY I. CUARES Name of Rater:

Position: TEACHER I Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: QUEZON INTEGRATED SCHOOL Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2018 - 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Weight Performance Indicators Actual

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Results
Very Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3)
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge June 2018 7.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable
Education Knowledge and of content within and to March knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of evidence was
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No
Services Pedagogy across curriculum 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its shown
4 lessons using lessons using lessons using of the given MOV acceptable
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and evidence was
and across and across and across and
supported by any supported by any supported by any shown
subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in
given MOV given MOV given MOV
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4

Timeliness

Weight Performance Indicators Actual

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Used a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable
Education teaching strategies to March knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of evidence was
Efficiency Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
Services that enhance learner 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its shown
different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
achievement in integration within integration within integration within integration within
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
literacy and and across and across and across and
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote
numeracy skills. subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject
writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or reading, writing
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in
numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills and/or numeracy
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
Basic 2. Used a range of June 2018 7.50%
Education teaching strategies to March
Services that enhance learner 2019
achievement in Timeliness
literacy and
numeracy skills.

Performance Indicators
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)

Basic 3. Applied a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
Education teaching strategies to to March teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence was
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
Services develop critical and 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
4 lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as evidence was
creative thinking, as Timeliness develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by any shown
well as other higher- and creative and creative and creative and creative
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1of the given
order thinking skills. thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
supported by supported by supported by any MOV
other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
any1ofthe other any1 of the other 1of the other
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV
given MOV given MOV given MOV
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating
of 4
 Weight Performance Indicators Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed June 2018 7.50% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable
Education Environment classroom structure to March Efficiency management
Submitted at management
Submitted 3 management
Submitted 2 management
Submitted 1 evidence was
No acceptable
Services and Diversity to engage learners, 2019 strategies that strategies
least 4 lessons lessons that strategies
lessons as that strategies
lesson that shown
evidence was
of Learners individually or in Timeliness engage learners
supported by engage
supported learners
by engage
evidenced learners
by engage
supportedlearners
by shown
groups, in in
MOV 1 and any in MOV 1 and any in MOV 1 and in
any of the
meaningful activities/tasks
1 of the other 1 of the other supported by activities/tasks
activities/tasks activities/tasks acceptable
exploration, as shown in
acceptable as shown in
acceptable as
anyshown
1of thein as
MOV shown in
discovery and MOV
MOV 1 with a MOV1witha
MOV MOV 1 with
other given a MOV 1with a
hands-on activities rating of 7 rating of 6 rating
MOV of 5 rating of 4
within a range of
physical learning
environments.

Weight Performance Indicators Actual

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Managed learner June 2018 7.50% Quality Applied teacher Used classroom Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable
Education behavior to March Efficiency management
Submitted at management
Submitted at management
Submitted at management
Submitted any 1 evidence was
No acceptable
Services constructively by 2019 strategies of
least 4 of the strategies that
least 4 of the strategies of
least 4 of the strategies
of the givenof shown
evidence was
applying positive Timeliness learner behavior engage learners learner behavior learner behavior
given strategies given strategies given strategies strategies as shown
and non-violent that promote in in
as observed as observed in that promote in that
as observed promote
observed in only
discipline to ensure positive
at least 4and activities/tasks
3 lessons positive
2 lessonsand positive
1 lessonand
learning- focused non-violent
lessons as shown in non-violent non-violent
environments. discipline as MOV1witha discipline as discipline as
shown in MOV rating of 6 shown in MOV shown in MOV
submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4
 Weight Performance Indicators Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 6. Used June 2018 7.50% Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable
Education differentiated, to March Efficiency differentiated
Submitted at differentiated
Submitted 3 differentiated
Submitted 2 differentiated
Submitted any 1 evidence was
No acceptable
Services developmentally 2019 teaching
least 4 teaching
differentiated teaching
differentiated teaching
at least 4 shown
evidence was
appropriate Timeliness strategies to strategies
differentiated teaching to strategies
teaching to strategies
lessons asto shown
learning address
teaching learner address
strategies in at address
learner strategieslearner
in 2 address
observedlearner
in 3
experiences to diversity
strategies in at least 2 lessons diversity
as diversity as lessons as as diversity
lessons as as
address learners’ shown
least 2 in MOV shown
lessons in MOVby shown
as evidenced in MOV
evidenced by shown
observed MOV
in in 2
gender, needs, 1aswith a rating 1 with
evidenced by MOV 1 and a rating 1 with a
MOV 1 and rating 1lessons
with a rating
strengths, interests of
MOV7 1 and of 6
supported by of 5
supported by of 4
observed in only
and experiences. supported by any1ofthe other any1ofthe other 1 lesson
Weight Performance Indicators Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA any 1 of the acceptable
Very acceptable differentiated
Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET Outstanding (5) MOV
other Satisfactory (3) teaching
Satisfactory (4) MOV (2) (1)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, June 2018 7.50% Quality Planned
acceptable and Planned and Planned and Planned
strategy inand
only No acceptable
Education and Planning managed and to March Efficiency implemented
MOV
Submitted at implemented
Submitted 3 implemented
Submitted 2 implemented
1Submitted
lesson as1 evidence was
No acceptable
Services implemented 2019 developmentally
least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally
evidently shown shown
developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
developmentally Timeliness sequenced
developmentally sequenced
sequenced sequenced
sequenced sequenced
in any 1 of the shown
sequenced
sequenced teaching
sequenced and teaching and
teaching and teaching and
teaching and teaching
teaching and
acceptableand
teaching and learning
teaching and learning
learning learning
learning learning
MOV
learning
learning processes process
learning as process
process asas process
process asas process
process as
as
to meet curriculum shown
process asin MOV shown
evidently shown evidently shown shown
in MOV shown in MOV in shown
evidently MOV
requirements and 1evidently
with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with
shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any 1 of the a rating
varied teaching of 7
in MOV 1 and of 6
supported by of 5
supported by of 4 MOV
given
contexts. supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the other given other given
other given MOV MOV
Weight MOV Performance Indicators Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 8. Participated in June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable
Education collegial to March Efficiency participated
Participated in
in participated
Participated in
in 3 participated
Participated in
in 2 participated
Participated in
in 1 evidence was
No acceptable
Services discussions that 2019 LACs/FGDs/
at least 4 LACs/FGDs/
LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/
LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/
LAC/FGD/ in shown
evidence was
use teacher and meetings
LACs/FGDs/ to meetings
meetings to
as meetings
meetings toas meeting
any 1 of to
the shown
learner feedback to discuss
meetings as discuss
evidently shown discuss
evidently shown discuss
given MOV
enrich teaching teacher/learner
evidently shown teacher/learner
in any 1 of the teacher/learner
in any 1 of the teacher/learner
Basic 8. Participated in June 2018 7.50%
Education collegial to March
Services discussions that 2019
use teacher and Timeliness
learner feedback to
enrich teaching
practice.

Weight Performance Indicators Actual

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 9. Selected, June 2018 7.50% Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
Education developed, to March Efficiency used variedat
Submitted used varied3
Submitted used varied2
Submitted used variedany
Submitted evidence was
No acceptable
Services organized and 2019 teaching
least 4 varied varied teaching varied teaching teaching and
and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
evidence was
used appropriate Timeliness learning learning learning learning
teaching and and learning and learning learning shown
teaching and resources,
learning resources,
resources, resources,
resources, resources,
resource,
learning resources, including
resources, ICT, to including
including ICT, including ICT, including
ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT,
ICT, to
including ICT, to address
including ICT, address
as evidently address
as evidently address
as evidently
address learning learning goals learning
as evidently shown ingoals
MOV learning
shown ingoals
MOV learning
shown ingoals
any of
goals. as
shown in MOV 1 and supported 1 and supported as
shown in as shown in as shown in theshown in
acceptable
MOV1witha MOV1witha MOV 1 with
1 and supported by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating
by any 1 of the acceptableof 6 rating of
acceptable5 rating of 4
acceptable MOV MOV
Weight MOV Performance Indicators Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 4. 10. Designed, June 2018 7.50% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No acceptable
Education Assessment selected, organized to March Efficiency selected,
Submitted at selected,
Submitted 3 selected,
Submitted 2 selected,
Submitted 1 evidence was
No acceptable
Services and Reporting and used 2019 organized and organized
least 4 varied varied and organized
varied and organized and shown
assessment tool evidence was
diagnostic, Timeliness used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, shown
assessment assessment assessment as evidently
formative and formative
tools as and formative
tools as and formative
tools as and formative and of
shown in any
summative summative summative summative summative
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown the acceptable
assessment assessment
inany1ofthe assessment
inany1ofthe assessment
in any1ofthe assessment
MOV
strategies strategies
acceptable strategies
acceptable strategies
acceptable strategies
consistent with consistent
MOV with consistent
MOV with consistent
MOV with consistent with
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements. requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
 Weight Performance Indicators Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 11. Monitored and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable
Education evaluated learner to March Efficiency monitored
Submitted a and monitored
Submitted a and monitored
Submitted a and monitored and
Submitted 1 evidence was
No acceptable
Services progress and 2019 evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated
combination of combination of combination of acceptable shown
evidence was
achievement using Timeliness learner
at least progress
4 of the learner
3 of the progress learner
2 of the progress learner
MOV progress shown
learner attainment and
acceptable and
acceptable and
acceptable and
data. achievement
MOV achievement
MOV achievement
MOV achievement
using learner using learner using learner using learner
attainment data attainment data attainment data attainment data
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Weight Performance Indicators Actual

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 12. Communicated June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable
Education promptly and to March Efficiency showed
Submittedprompt
a showed
Submittedprompt
a showed
Submittedprompt
a prompt
Submittedandany 1 evidence was
No acceptable
Services clearly the learners’ 2019 and clear
combination of and clear
combination of and clear
combination of clear
of the given shown
evidence was
needs, progress Timeliness communication communication communication communication
at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the MOV shown
and achievement to of the learners’
acceptable of the learners’
acceptable of the learners’
acceptable of the learners’
key stakeholders, needs,
MOV progress needs,
MOV progress needs,
MOV progress needs, progress
including and and and and
parents/guardians. achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to
key key key key
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including including including including
parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
 Weight Performance Indicators Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable
Education various related to March performed performed performed performed evidence was
Services works/activities that 2019 various related various related various related various related shown
contribute to the work/activities work/activities work/activities work/activities
teaching-learning that contribute that contribute that contribute that contribute
process. to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching
learning learning learning learning
process as process as process as process as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

Timeliness least 4 different different kinds different kinds of the evidence was
kinds of of acceptable of acceptable acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHM
MOV ADJECTIVAL RATING

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 -5.000 Outstanding
3.500- 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

MA LIZA T. BANDOLA WENELY I. CUARES

Rater Ratee Approving Authority
me of Rater: MA. LIZA T. BANDOLA, PhD
tion: HEAD TEACHER III
e of Review: OCTOBER 2018

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Rating
Score
Q E T Ave

2 5 3.5 0.2625

Rating
Score
Q E T Ave

4 3 3.5 0.2625
4 3 3.5 0.2625

Rating

Score
Q E T Ave

4 4 4 0.3
 Rating
Score
Q E T Ave

4 4 4 0.3

Rating
Score
Q E T Ave

4 4 4 0.3
 Rating
Score
Q E T Ave

3 3 3 0.225

Rating
Score
Q E T Ave

4 4 4 0.3

Rating
Score
Q E T Ave

3 3 3 0.225
3 3 3 0.225

Rating
Score
Q E T Ave

4 4 4 0.3

Rating
Score
Q E T Ave

3 3 3 0.225
 Rating
Score
Q E T Ave

4 4 4 0.3

Rating
Score
Q E T Ave

3 3 3 0.225
 Rating
Score
Q E T Ave

3 3 3 0.3

NG FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS 3.525

ECTIVAL RATING VERY SATISFACTORY

proving Authority