INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: CECILIA A. REDUCTO Name of Rater: MA. JOYLENE Q. ENCARNACION

Position: TEACHER 2 Position: MASTER TEACHER 1
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: CEBU PROVINCE Date of Review: December 5, 2018
Rating Period: June 2018-March 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied June 2018- Quality No acceptable
Services Knowledge and knowledge of April 2019 evidence was
Pedagogy content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge shown
across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
7.5% 5 5 5.000
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV evidence was
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by shown
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range June 2018- Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
Services of teaching April 2019 different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable 5 5 5.000

learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was
lessons as lessons as lessons as lessons as shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the other
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 given MOV
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given given

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range June 2018- Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
Services Knowledge and of teaching April 2019 teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills
thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
skills. 7.5% 5 5 5.000
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any of the other shown
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed June 2018- Quality No acceptable
Services Environment classroom April 2019 Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom evidence was
and Diversity of structure to management management management management shown
Learners engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in
individually or in
activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
activities/tasks as
groups, in
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
meanigful
7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
with a rating of 4 5 5 5.000
exploration,
discovery and Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
hands-on supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
activities within a the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
range of physical MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
learning acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
environments. Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed June 2018- Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable
Services learner behavior April 2019 management management management management evidence was
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
7.5% 5 5 5.000
 focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
7.5% 5 5 5.000

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only shown
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson
4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used June 2018- Quality Applied Applied Applied No acceptable
Services Environment differentiated, April 2019 differentiated Applied differentiated differentiated evidence was
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies teaching strategies shown
Learners appropriate to address learner teaching strategies to address learner to address learner
learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown diversity as shown
diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4
rating of 6
gender, needs,
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown 5 5 5.000
experiences.
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, June 2018- Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable
Services and Planning managed and April 2019 implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
processes to with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
meet curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
varied teaching 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was 5 5 5.000
contexts. sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
 evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in June 2018- Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable
Services and Planning collegial April 2019 participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
7.5% submitted submitted submitted 5 5 5.000
Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable
least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently as evidently shown shown
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV given MOV
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, June 2018- Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
Services developed, April 2019 used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning address learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable
7.5% 5 5 5.000
teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown
varied teaching and including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
learning resources, evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
 teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown
varied teaching and including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
learning resources, evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
including ICT, as MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
evidently shown in supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
MOV 1 and of the acceptable of the acceptable
supported by any 1 MOV MOV
of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, June 2018- Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable
Services and Reporting selected, April 2019 organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, shown
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative summative
summative assessment assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% 5 5 5
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable

varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and June 2018- Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable
Services evaluated learner April 2019 monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was
progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown
achievement progress and progress and progress and and achievement
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as
 progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown
achievement progress and progress and progress and and achievement
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted
7.5% 5 5 5 5.000
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica June 2018- Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable
Services and Reporting ted promptly and April 2019 showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was
clearly the clear communication of clear communication of shown
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs,
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders,
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/
guardians. including parents/ guardians as including parents/ guardians as
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV
7.5% shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted 5 5 5 5
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018- Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable
Services various related April 2019 performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was
works/activities related related related work/activities that shown
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018- Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable
Services various related April 2019 performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was
works/activities related related related work/activities that shown
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted 0 0 0.000
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Very Satisfactory
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory CECILIA A. REDUCTO MA. JOYLENE Q. ENCARNACION YOLANDO B. EUMAGUE
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
MENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
MA. JOYLENE Q. ENCARNACION
MASTER TEACHER 1
December 5, 2018

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Score

0.375

0.375
Score

0.375

0.375

0.375
0.375

Score

0.375

0.375
Score

0.375

0.375
Score

0.375
0.375

Score

0.375
 0.000

4.500

YOLANDO B. EUMAGUE
Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPC
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: CECILIA A. REDUCTO

Position: TEACHER 2
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: CEBU PROVINCE
Rating Period: June 2018-March 2019

Numerical
Weight per Weight per
KRA Objectives
KRA Objective
Q
Objective 1 7.5% 5
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 5
Objective 3 7.5% 5
Objective 4 7.5% 5
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 5
Objective 6 7.5% 5
Objective 7 7.5% 5
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5
Objective 9 7.5% 5
Objective 10 7.5% 5
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5
Objective 12 7.5% 5
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

CECILIA A. REDUCTO MA. JOYLENE Q. ENCARNACION

Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
ient Teacher)

Name of Rater: MA. JOYLENE Q. ENCARNACION

Position: MASTER TEACHER 1
Date of Review: December 5, 2018

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
5 5 5.000 0.375
5 5 5.000 0.375
0 0.000 0.000
Final Rating Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 4.5

LENE Q. ENCARNACION YOLANDO B. EUMAGUE

Rater Approving Authority
 Results-Based Performance Management Systems
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM-TEACHER
Name: CECILIA ASENTISTA-REDUCTO Name of Rater: MA. JOYLENE Q. ENCARNACION
Position: TEACHER 2 Position: Master Teacher 1
Review Period: JUNE 2018-APRIL 2019 Date of Review: December 5, 2018
School/Division: KANG-ACTOL ELEM. SCHOOL

TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Rate
WEIGHT
ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES PER RESULTS
AVE. SCORE
KRA Q E T

1. Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum

teaching areas.
0 5 5 5 0.375

1. Content 2. Used a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner

Knowledge schievement in literacy and numeracy skills. 0 5 5 5 0.375
22.5%
and
Pedagogy
3. Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and
creative thinking, as well as other higher order thinking skills.
0 5 5 5 0.375

4. Managed classroom structure to engage learners,

individually or in groups, in meanigful exploration, discovery
and hands-on activities within a range of physical learning
0 5 5 5 0.375
environments.

2. Learning
Environment 5. Managed learner behavior constructively by applying positive
22.5%
and Diversity and non-violent discipline to ensure learning-focused 0 5 5 5 0.375
of Learners environment
0
6. Used differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning
experiences to address learners’ gender, needs, strengths, 0 5 5 5 0.375
interests and experiences.
Basic
Education
Services 7. Planned, managed and implemented developmentally
sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet curriculum 5 5 5 0.375
requirements and varied teaching contexts.

3. Curriculum 8. Participated in collegial discussions that use teacher and

and Planning learner feedback to enrich teaching practice.
22.5% 0 5 5 5 0.375

9. Selected, developed, organized and used appropriate

teaching and learning resources, including ICT, to address 0 5 5 5 0.375
learning goals.

10. Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic,

formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with 0 5 5 5 0.375
curriculum requirements.
4.
Assessment 11. Monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement 0 5 5 5 5 0.375
using learner attainment data. 22.5%
and
Reporting
12.Communica ted promptly and clearly the learners’ needs,
progress and achievement to key stakeholders, including 0 5 5 5 5 0.375
parents/ guardians.

5. Plus 13. Performed various related works/activities that contribute to

Factor the teaching-learning process.
10% 0 0 0 0 0 0

OVERALL RATING 4.500

DESCRIPTIVE RATING Very Satisfactory

MA. JOYLENE Q. ENCARNACION CECILIA A. REDUCTO

RATER RATEE