Rimah SC 1b Assessment 1 Lesson Plan Final
Rimah SC 1b Assessment 1 Lesson Plan Final
Rimah SC 1b Assessment 1 Lesson Plan Final
Topic area: Energy in our Life Stage of Learner: 4 year 8 Syllabus Pages: 107-208
Cross Curriculum themes & General Explicit subject specific concepts and skills
capabilities. Class communications.
Personal and social capability. Interacting.
Critical and creative thinking. Moving.
Literacy Planning.
Evaluating and discussing personal ideas
Quality Teaching Elements (lesson focus) Highlight the appropriate areas
Intellectual Quality 1.1 Deep knowledge 1.4 Higher-order
This refers to pedagogy focused on producing deep understanding of 1.2 Deep thinking
important, substantive concepts, skills and ideas. Such pedagogy understanding 1.5 Metalanguage
treats knowledge as something that requires active construction and 1.3 Problematic 1.6 Substantive
requires students to engage in higher-order thinking and to knowledge communication
communicate substantively about what they are learning.
Quality Learning Environment 2.1 Explicit quality 2.4 Social Support
This refers to pedagogy that creates classrooms where students and criteria 2.5 Students’ self -
teachers work productively in an environment clearly focused on 2.2 Engagement regulation
learning. Such pedagogy sets high and explicit expectations and 2.3 High 2.6 Student direction
develops positive relationships between teacher and students and Expectations
among students.
Significance 3.1 Background 3.4 Inclusivity
This refers to pedagogy that helps make learning more meaningful knowledge 3.5 Connectedness
and important to students. Such pedagogy draws clear connections 3.2 Cultural 3.6 Narrative
with students’ prior knowledge and identities, with contexts outside knowledge
of the classroom, and with multiple ways of knowing all cultural 3.3 Knowledge
perspective. integration
How the quality teaching elements you have identified are achieved within the lesson.
social Support The lesson gives students the opportunity to interact and by part of learning. This
achieved through the use of different activities such as Think, Pair and Share activity
where students are asked to gather in a group discuss and provide a scientific
explanation of three different situations.
Background Throughout the lesson there are different parts in which students are engage with
knowledge content using class discussion. The discussions in this lesson are preparing to review
how much students actually know about the content which in turn give the teacher the
chance to assess them.
Engagement Students participated activities such as Think, Pair and shear activity, class discussion
during teacher domo activity etc….
L- literacy focus , N- numeracy focus and ICT focus
Time Teaching and learning action Actions Students’ Action Assessments
10m Review
Start the lesson with brainstorming students current Student: Using a
understanding of energy. participate in the unit whiteboard,
Use Think, Pair, Share activity to prompt students to learning focus activity. write student’s
participate and discuss their ideas, display the response and
following questions on the board as a guide: Possible responses: address some
List different form of energy that you knew Mechanical energy of
and see around. (Kinetic/ potential misconception
Why energy is important in your life. Think energy) students may
of everything happening around such as Chemical energy have.
people moving, blowing winds, cars and Light energy
trucks are moving etc…... Solar energy Note student’s
Use Think, Pair, Share activity to prompt response to be
students to participate and discuss their reviewed and
ideas. Aimed answers discussed
Lesson topic - Energy formes and changes Energy is the ability to during future
(L focus) work. It is essential for lessons to
everything we do in life. check if their
Things we do with energy- Ask students to pair up All thing happing around understanding
and write an answer to the following questions and us need energy. progress.
share it with the whole class.
(Engage) Start posing the questions by draw out students Energy can not be
respond by asking the whole class “what form of created it’s only
energy you learned about came to your mind first”? transferred
15m
Student: students listen Engage the
(Explain) Energy formes to teacher explanation students with
Facilitate power point presentation to explicitly and in their science presentation
teach where energy comes from and the different notebook, students take and check their
ways that an object can possess energy. Use the notes of the different understanding
following example: type of energy. by posing
Heat energy- explain how the internal motion questions. This
of atoms causes heat energy. Students involve in the includes:
Chemical energy- explain how chemical lesson and ask or How chemical
energy is required to bond atoms together. answer teacher reaction can be
Use fuel/ food as an example of stored energy questions. observed or
and how energy is released when atoms what happens
bonds are broken. Watching the video. to substance
Electromagnetic energy – use electricity to when reaction
explain the powerline carrying is chemical
electromagnetic energy into home. reaction is
Nuclear energy – explain the process in occurred?
which the nuclear core (nuclei) releases
energy when it’s broken a part. What devices
can be used to
Mechanical energy – potential and kinetic detect
energy. electromagnetic
Use a diagram to briefly explain the units’ energy
joule (J) kilojoules (kJ) and megajoules (MJ)
used to measure energy. Relate this unit to a
litre as unit of measurement for volume.
Gifted and talented students: Have students to use their devises and explore solar energy and different
process in which energy in transferred into different forms, use some natural process (photosynthesis) and
some devised by people (solar panels). Ask them to record their finding and share it with the class.
Students with disabilities: To assess students with visual and intellectual impairment, use large font,
pictures to explain the different form of energy. Use sequenced worksheet and allow enough time to read
question and write down the answers.
Other considerations
Complete the table blow by inserting the AISTL graduate standards that you are
demonstrating and indicates the evidence from this lesson that should comply with the
standard.
Resources Attached:
Resource (I)
Lesson Plan
Cross Curriculum themes & General capabilities Explicit subject specific concepts and skills
Quality Learning Students are given the opportunity to collaborate with their peer throughout the lesson
Environment (card game, practical experiment, class discussions). Students guided to deliver their
personal knowledge and skills learnt in the previous learning context.
Significance the content of the lesson if an extension from the last lesson. Students put energy in
action and explore how potential and kinetic energy is exist and present in the real life
situation.
5min Recap – think, pair and share mini activity Students will apply
Assign students into a group of 5 and hand out their understanding of Check student’s
questioning cards (each per group). content covered in the response to the cards
(Engage) Ask each group to write an answer to their last lesson and hone questions and correct
question on the card. team build skills as any misconceptions.
Ask each group to choose one student to share they communicate to
it with the class. share their knowledge
and presented to their
peers.
10min Lesson topic- potential/ kinetic energy
(L, N focus)
Have each group collaborate and brainstorm Groups start Record student’s
their roller coaster and model design. Also performing the ability to apply
25min point to the groups that they will built their experiment and model understanding. Ask
model using the provided space and classroom their roller coaster students questions
materials (groups will use the side benches as following the practical about their model.
(Explore) space for their model, students are to use class worksheet/ creativity Observe students
room chair if desired). point and marking understanding of
Hand out the experiment material and let each rubric. where they went
group to proceed in building their roller With teacher guide wrong / how they can
coasters using provided classroom space/ students start testing make an adjustment /
materials. their model and apply what physical context
an adjustment if need such as gravity they
Allow 10 min for the groups to build their first it. need to consider and
model (students may need to change in the Guide students
height of the starting point and allow the through modifying
(Elaborate) marble to loop their roller coaster loop). At their model if need it.
this stage, give each group marbles/ stop Take note of most
watch to test their design and help them in successful team.
making adjustment if required.
Students in each group take part in completing
the experiment by recording the mass of each Student record/
marble, measuring the track distance to find analyse their
the speed and the starting point to grand experiment results and
needed to calculate the velocity of the marble. complete the results
Ask students to use se stopwatch to measure and discussion section
the velocity (v m/s2) of the marble “the rate of of the experiment.
travel of an object, along with its direction”
Students calculate the gravitational potential
energy GPE in J for each marble and the Kinetic
energy KE using the formula provided in the
prac worksheet where GPE = an Object mass g
X acceleration due to gravity 9.8 on earth X
height above the ground in meter (J). From the
velocity measurement and the mass of the
marbles, students are to calculate the kinetic
energy using the formula K.E. = 1/2 m v2 , the
explanation and example provided in the
experiment worksheet.
Gifted and talented students: provide the students with an opportunity to design and construct complex
model of roller coaster. Make sure that the class material and space allow the students to establish their
desired design. Challenge the students to attempt all the calculation independently before they share it with
their team.
Students with disabilities: To assess students with visual and intellectual impairment, use large font,
pictures to explain the different the concept of Potential and kinetic energy. Sequenced worksheet to provide
the students with a scaffolded instructions and requirement. Also guide student’s progress while constructing
their model and allow extra time for students to perform the experiment and finish all the calculations. Check
students understanding of content through involve them in the class discussions.
Other considerations
Complete the table blow by inserting the AISTL graduate standards that you are
demonstrating and indicates the evidence from this lesson that should comply with the
standard.
Use effective The lesson is based on promoting student’s communication and problem-solving
classroom skills. Teacher present different situation of energy use and allow the students
communication predict, show evidence.
Demonstrate a
ran
2.5 Literacy and Teacher provide the students with different task in which they improve their literacy
numeracy and numeracy skill. This includes:
strategies Card game, writing experiment method and results, recording and interpreting data,
calculating the potential / kinetic energy etc….
5.2 Provide Teacher guides the students through completing their model and provided with
feedback to scientific explanations of how where they went wrong with their model and how they
students on can improve it.
their learning
4.4 Maintain Students are informed of experiment WHS hey need to be aware of. Teacher monitors
student safety students throughout the experiment.
Resource (II)
Group 1. Group2.
Describe which type of energy What type of energy is stored in oil, coal and
transformation occurs when gasoline food. how they can be release? Describe
burns in an automobile? which energy transformation occurs first in a
Hint – The process involves 3 type of coal−burning power plant?
energy.
Group3. Group4.
Pair up these objects with their main energy Draw a flow map showing the flow of energy
conversions. transformations in a car from starting vehicle
torch electrical to sound to driving. You should have 5 different types of
battery electrical to light & sound energy.
Group5.
Explain the concept – Energy cannot be crated or
destroyed and give one example. Name the term
used to express the energy forms changing from
one to another?
Lesson Plan
Topic area: Energy Stage of Learner: 4 (year 8) Syllabus Pages:
transformation
Cross Curriculum themes & General capabilities Explicit subject specific concepts and skills
How the quality teaching elements you have identified are achieved within the
lesson.
Quality Learning The practical element of the lesson is designed to allow the students to self-regulate and
Environment establish their own leaning model.
Online resources to engage students.
5
Recap – Kahoot quiz
Students interpret
their finding and
provide a brief
decision about it.
Gifted and talented students: Have students to involve in the class discussion and provide an
explanation to the teacher demo activity and ask them to share it with the class. Students who finish
their lab experiment may go to https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/legacy/microwaves
stimulation website and further investigate heat radiation and how microwave heat up our food.
Students with disabilities: To assess students with intellectual impairment, use large font, pictures
to explain the content of the lesson. Use sequenced experiment instruction and allow enough time to
read through. The groups should be established with take a consideration to how to best team the
students and according the needs of all students. Provide extra instruction to experiment steps and
interpretation and data and outcomes.
Other considerations
Complete the table blow by inserting the AISTL graduate standards that you are
demonstrating and indicates the evidence from this lesson that should comply
with the standard.
Graduate Evidence within this lesson
Standards
Engage in Students participate in different activities such as online quiz, teacher domo and class
professional discussions, forming in a group to perform practical experiment
learning and
improve
practice
Assess student Recap quiz.
learning Class discussion and teacher assessing questions.
Google docs.
Use teaching Quiz.
strategies Power point presentation.
Teacher domo.
Practical experiment
Revising discussions
Google docx
Resources Attached:
Resource (III)
INQUIRY- BASED LEARING ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS
In recent years the word nation has been characterised by increasing
globalisation, internationalisation and increasing in education mobility
leading to diversity of learners and learning opportunities within the
education system. Educators across the nation are in continuous
challenge to create effective learning to serve the multipurpose of
education. While so achieve these learning goals, educators also
required to work with multiple constituencies and adopt the different
environment (Jerrim, Oliver & Sims, 2019).
In response to these rapid changes and requirements, a considerable
amount of research offered convincing evidence to demonstrate
problem-based learning and project-based learning, which are
collectively referred to in this paper as Inquiry- Based learning IBL.
The IBL approaches that have been defined as an effective teaching
pedagogy for educators to use in the design of teaching and learning
context (Albion, 2015)
Arguably demonstrating IBL appropriately provides a logical basis for
educators to effectively design teaching and learning content.
Furthermore, as comparison to the traditional style of teaching, there
has been growing evidence from large-scaled research including
investigating experiments and queasi-experiment studies indicating a
significant improvement in students learning outcomes where IBL
approach is implemented. The IBL approaches supports the idea that
educators should integrate both, the epistemic knowledge as well as the
epistemic practice of the domains been learnt allowing the students to
engage through an authentic and meaningful learning experience
(Blessinger & Carfora, 2015).
Chung (as cited in Witt & Ulmer, 2010) approached a similar subject.
The study conducted through the use of a set of three analysis to inspect
any significant student’s educational outcomes when constructivist
teaching is used. The statistical data from Chung study showed no
correlation between implements in favour of traditional instructional
method. In addition, Burris & Garton (2007) determined that students
tend to score more in content knowledge assessments when they
receive learning through a traditional setting of instructions. This
variation occurs due to concept difference between each approach. One
of the key differences is instruction promotes content coverage while
constructivist method comprehends deeper understand of materials,
however it does not represent content knowledge level (p.113).
This problematic issue in instructional paradigm also emerged with
other researchers to challenge the effectiveness of constructivist
instructional approach of IBL. Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006)
uncovered a key issue of how classroom organisation is linked to human
neuroscience cognition development. Their argument was based upon
the assumption of humans learning secondary and primary tasks at the
same rate that is claimed by constructivist instruction approach such as
IBL. However, understanding of working memory and long-term
memory have led to the argument that the way human cognitive load
processes new inquiry minimally instructed learning does not work.
Since transformation of acquired knowledge is insufficient to be moved
from working memory to long- term inquiry level. While the learner
focuses on new inquiry, the working memory is insufficient at
transferring knowledge into restrained knowledge. Therefore, applying
constructivist instruction approach can only be successful when the
leaner has efficient existing knowledge (Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark,
2006). Since all form of learning requires some sort of instruction
regardless of whether it be delivered via guided or constructivist
method. It’s the ability of the approach to provide disguised instructions
in which the disciplinary thinking strategies are exclusive. Hmelo-Silver,
Duncan & Chinn (2007) discusses this phenomenon by seeking the type
of instructional approach that promotes the foundation of instruction or
learning knowledge. Article findings analyse that providing guidance is
an essential aspect of both constructivist, constructional, IBL and
traditional instructional approaches. However, it’s the structure or the
scaffolding of learning through understanding in which composition of
learning where guided and constructivist instruction are to be
approached (Hmelo-Silver, Duncan & Chinn, 2007). Therefore. We can
conclude, that it’s critical for educators to have empirical programme
and constructivism vision about their students.
References
Albion, P. (2015). Project-, problem-, and inquiry-based learning. Teaching and Digital
Technologies: Big Issues and Critical Questions, 240.Retrieved from
https://eprints.usq.edu.au/27878/1/Albion_Ch19_AV.pdf
Blessinger, P., & Carfora, J. M. (Eds.). (2015). Inquiry-based learning for multidisciplinary
programs : A conceptual and practical resource for educators. Retrieved from
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Brew, A. (2012). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for
inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education
Research & Development, 31(1), 101-114.Reterived from
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/tea.21401
Burris, S., & Garton, B. (2007). Effect Of Instructional Strategy On Critical Thinking And
Content Knowledge: Using Problem-Based Learning In The Secondary
Classroom. Journal Of Agricultural Education, 48(1), 106-116. doi:
10.5032/jae.2007.01106
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and Quasi-
Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching: A Meta-
Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
High Touch High Tech® Science Experiences That Come To You. (2019). Retrieved from
https://sciencemadefun.net/downloads/marble_coaster.pdf
Hmelo-Silver, C., Duncan, R., & Chinn, C. (2007). Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-
Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark
(2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
Institute of Physics. (2012). http://practicalphysics.org/relationships-between-
acceleration-force-and-mass.html
Jerrim, J., Oliver, M., & Sims, S. (2019). The relationship between inquiry-based teaching
and students’ achievement. New evidence from a longitudinal PISA study in
England. Learning and Instruction, 61, 35-44.
Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction
Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-
Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational
Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
NSW Education Standards Authority (2018). Australian Professional Standards for
Teachers (pp. 1-28). Sydney NSW. Retrieved from:
https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-
library/download-graduate-level-
descriptorsa45e8f91b1e86477b58fff00006709da.pdf?sfvrsn=d0b6eb3c_0
NSW Education Standards Authority (NESA) (2018). Chemistry stage 4 syllabus. Sydney,
Australia: NESA NSW. Retrieved from:
https://syllabus.nesa.nsw.edu.au/chemistry-stage4
Science by Doing. Engaging students with science. (2015). Year 10 Motion and Energy
Transfer, student guide.
https://www.sciencebydoing.edu.au/teacher/curriculum-units
Settlage, J., & Meadows, L. (2002). Standards-based reform and its unintended
consequences: Implication for science education within America's urban schools.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 114-127
Tasior, B. (2015). Teaching physics using project-based engineering curriculum with a
theme of alternative energy (Order No. 1587703). Available from ProQuest
Dissertations & Theses Global. (1681623522). Retrieved from
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1681623522?accountid=36155
Witt, C., & Ulmer, J. (2010). The impact of inquiry-based learning on the academic
achievement of middle school students. In Proceeding of the 29th Annual Western
Region AAAE Research Conference (Vol. 269, p. 282).
Year 8 Energy | Irymple Secondary College. (2019). Retrieved from
http://www.irysec.vic.edu.au/page.php?id=252