Manual On Hydrography - IHO PDF

INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC ORGANIZATION
MANUAL ON
HYDROGRAPHY
Publication M-13
1st Edition
May 2005
PUBLISHED BY THE
INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC BUREAU
MONACO
INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC ORGANIZATION
MANUAL ON
HYDROGRAPHY
Publication M-13
1st Edition
May 2005
Published by the
International Hydrographic Bureau
4, Quai Antoine 1er
B.P. 445 - MC 98011 MONACO Cedex
Principauté de Monaco
Telefax: (377) 93 10 81 40
E-mail: info@ihb.mc
Web: www.iho.shom.fr
i
PREFACE
The IHO Manual on Hydrography general objective is to provide knowledge on the concepts involved in
hydrography as well as guidance to plan and execute hydrographic surveys. The Manual is considered to
be a professional guide for hydrographic surveyors and a tool for teachers and students involved in
hydrographic courses or programs.
The preparation of this Manual started after the majority of IHO Member States (MS) responded in favour
of proceeding with a project that could result in a Hydrographic Manual (1999). The IHB proposed then
the establishment of a Working Group that met for the first time at the IHB premises, 20-22 June 2001,
where the Table of Contents was agreed; Team Leaders were identified to deal with specific subjects,
being responsible for the compilation of experts’ contributions, and a work program was defined. In 2004
a second meeting took place to review the result obtained and decide on a draft version of the Manual.
After collecting comments from MS, the final version was prepared and the IHO Manual on Hydrography
was published.
The Manual is considered to be a worthy product that contributes to the mission of the IHO, whose
objectives are:
• The co-ordination of the activities of national hydrographic offices;

• The greatest possible uniformity in nautical charts and documents;
• The adoption of reliable and efficient methods of carrying out and exploiting hydrographic
surveys;
• The development of the sciences in the field of hydrography and the techniques employed in
descriptive oceanography.
It has to be acknowledged that several Hydrographic Offices (HO) have made great efforts in preparing
and keeping up to date their version of a Hydrographic Manual, almost since their establishment, but the
resources, both, in time and manpower required for this activity have precluded several HOs from
continuing this practice, thus agreeing in the need to co-operate and co-ordinate the efforts for the
preparation of an IHO Hydrographic Manual. A Manual that could be useful to everybody, containing
specific aspects on hydrography and other matter only in general terms, as they are much more
thoroughly covered in existing textbooks which refer to them in considerably greater detail.
The content of this Manual is divided into seven chapters:
• Chapter 1 refers to the principles of hydrographic surveying, including its specifications;

• Chapter 2 refers to positioning;
• Chapter 3 to refers to depth determination, including both the principles and techniques used;
• Chapter 4 provides information on sea floor classification and object detection;
• Chapter 5 refers in particular to water levels and flow;
• Chapter 6 is devoted to topographic surveying applied to hydrography;
• Chapter 7 provides, in a structured way, complete details on hydrographic practice;
• Annexes with Acronyms, Bibliography and other relevant information.
M-13
ii
It is the IHB responsibility to keep this Manual up dated, following inputs from MS and other
organisations who are encouraged to provide the IHB with relevant information in this regard. If needed,
the IHB will request the advice of the FIG/IHO/ICA International Advisory Board on Standards of
Competence for Hydrographic Surveyors and Nautical Cartographers, on the best way to include new
material and/or organise the relevant chapter(s).
The IHB will keep the digital version of this Manual on the IHO web page and will print hard copies on
demand. With the assistance of readers and of Member States, the IHB will aim to maintain this
publication on a regular basis..
The IHB is particularly grateful to Admiral Ritchie of the United Kingdom for his encouragement and
support in writing the Introduction to this Manual.
The IHB would like to thank the following principal authors for their efforts in preparing the final text,
whilst acknowledging that they were ably assisted by many others who remain unnamed:
Capt Muhammad ZAFARYAB (Pakistan), Cdr Lamberto LAMBERTI (Italy), Lt Antonio DI

LIETO (Italy), Lt Cdr Paul LAWRENCE (UK), Lt Cdr Fernando ARTILHEIRO (Portugal), Lt Cdr Peter
JOHNSON (Australia), Cdr Jerry MILLS (USA), Mr Stephen GILL (USA), Mr Federico
MAYER (Argentina), Mr Hector SALGADO (Argentina), Lt Cdr Bob WILSON (UK) and Lt Cdr David
WYATT (UK).
__________
M-13
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE ....................................................................................................................................i
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................1
Brief history of hydrography..................................................................................................................1
Importance of hydrography.....................................................................................................................2
Fields of competence associated with hydrography................................................................................3
CHAPTER 1 “PRINCIPLES OF HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYING”...........................................7

1. Introduction..............................................................................................................................7
2. Hydrographic Surveying .........................................................................................................8
2.1 Survey Specifications ...................................................................................................8
2.2 Survey Planning..........................................................................................................11
2.3 Data Gathering............................................................................................................13
2.4 Data Processing...........................................................................................................13
2.5 Data Analysis..............................................................................................................15
2.6 Data Quality................................................................................................................15
2.7 Data Quality - Presentation.........................................................................................16
2.7.1 Chart Reliability Diagrams ............................................................................16
2.7.2 Zone of Confidence (ZOC)............................................................................17
2.8 Data Production ..........................................................................................................21
2.9 Nautical Information System (NIS) ............................................................................22
2.9.1 Compilation Process ...................................................................................24
2.9.2 Presentation ................................................................................................26
Annex A – Acronyums ....................................................................................................................29

References ....................................................................................................................30
URL Addresses ....................................................................................................................31
Bibliography ....................................................................................................................32
CHAPTER 2 “POSITIONING” .......................................................................................................33

1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................33
2. Principles of Positioning ........................................................................................................33
2.1 The Earth ....................................................................................................................33
2.1.1 The Ellipsoid ..............................................................................................34
2.1.2 The Local Sphere........................................................................................35
2.1.3 The Geoid ...................................................................................................36
2.2 Datum ....................................................................................................................36
2.2.1 Horizontal Datum .......................................................................................37
2.2.2 Type of Datum............................................................................................38
2.2.3 Datum Transformation ...............................................................................39
2.2.4 Vertical Datum ...........................................................................................41
2.3 Coordinates Systems ..................................................................................................43
2.4 Principles of Cartography ...........................................................................................43
2.5 Projections ..................................................................................................................45
2.5.1 Perspective (or geometric) projections .......................................................45
2.5.2 Conic projections........................................................................................45
2.5.3 Cylindrical projections ...............................................................................45
M-13
iv
2.5.4 Representations...........................................................................................46
2.5.5 Universal Transverse Mercator projection .................................................48
3. Horizontal Control Methods ................................................................................................49
3.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................49
3.2 Classic Method ...........................................................................................................49
3.2.1 Triangulation ..............................................................................................49
3.2.2 Trilateration ................................................................................................54
3.3 Mixed method .............................................................................................................55
3.3.1 Traverse ......................................................................................................55
3.3.2 Not Oriented Open Traverse.......................................................................57
3.3.3 Oriented Open Traverse..............................................................................58
3.3.4 Not Oriented Closed Traverse ....................................................................60
3.4 Photogrammetry method.............................................................................................62
3.4.1 Aerophotogrammetry..................................................................................63
3.5 Intervisibility of Geodetic Stations .............................................................................66
4. Vertical Control Methods......................................................................................................68
4.1 Geometric leveling......................................................................................................68
4.1.1 Principles and specifications ......................................................................68
4.1.2 Measurements and quality control..............................................................70
4.1.3 Sources of error ..........................................................................................70
4.1.4 Computation and compensation .................................................................70
4.2 Trigonometric levelling ..............................................................................................72
4.2.1 Principles and specifications ......................................................................72
4.2.2 Correction for sphericity.............................................................................73
4.2.3 Correction for refraction.............................................................................74
4.2.4 Correction of height....................................................................................75
4.2.5 Sources of error ..........................................................................................75
4.2.6 Computation and Compensation ................................................................76
4.3 Altimetry with GPS ....................................................................................................77
5. Instruments used to establish Horizontal and Vertical Control........................................78
5.1 GNSS Receiver (GPS) ................................................................................................78
5.2 Electronic instruments ................................................................................................78
5.2.1 Electronic Distance Measuring of phase ....................................................78
5.2.2 Electronic Distance Measuring of impulses ...............................................80
5.2.3 Precision and range of EDM ......................................................................82
5.2.4 Total stations ..............................................................................................83
5.3 Optic instruments ........................................................................................................83
5.3.1 Marine sextant (Circle to reflection) ..........................................................83
5.3.2 Theodolites .................................................................................................84
5.3.3 Levelling instruments (Levels) and Stadia .................................................86
6. Positioning Methods (Techniques of Positioning) ...............................................................87
6.1 GNSS (GPS) ...............................................................................................................87
6.1.1 Description of Global Positioning System (GPS) ......................................87
6.1.2 Principles of positioning.............................................................................89
6.1.3 Performances of the system and sources of error .......................................91
6.1.4 GPS tracking and signal acquisition techniques.........................................92
6.1.5 DGPS..........................................................................................................94
6.1.6 RTK ............................................................................................................95
6.1.7 Treatment of the data..................................................................................96
6.2 Electromagnetic ..........................................................................................................98
6.2.1 Accuracy in the position determination......................................................99
6.2.2 Lines of position (LOPs) ..........................................................................100
M-13
v
6.2.3 Circular lines of position (CLOPs)...........................................................100

6.2.4 Hyperbolic lines of position (HLOPs)......................................................101
6.2.5 Determination methods of electromagnetic wave lines of position .........101
(EW LOPs) .............................................................................................101
6.2.6 Measures of differences of phase .............................................................101
6.2.7 Measure of difference of time ..................................................................103
6.3 Acoustic Systems ......................................................................................................103
6.3.1 Acoustic Techniques.................................................................................104
6.3.2 Principles of Measurement .......................................................................108
6.3.3 Accuracy and errors sources.....................................................................111
6.4 Optical Techniques ...................................................................................................112
6.4.1 Tag Line Positioning (Cable sounding)....................................................113
6.4.2 Sextant resection Positioning (Inverse intersection).................................113
6.4.3 Triangulation/intersection Positioning (Direct intersection) ....................113
6.4.4 Range-Azilmuth Positioning (Mixed system optic and
electromagnetic).....................................................................................113
References ..................................................................................................................114
Bibliography ..................................................................................................................116
CHAPTER 3 “DEPTH DETERMINATION” ...............................................................................119

1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................119
2. Acoustic and Motion Sensors Fundamentals.....................................................................120
2.1 Sea water acoustic waves and physical characteristics .............................................120
2.1.1 Acoustic Field...........................................................................................120
2.1.2 Sonar Equation .........................................................................................121
2.1.3 Temperature..............................................................................................126
2.1.4 Salinity......................................................................................................126
2.1.5 Pressure.....................................................................................................126
2.1.6 Density......................................................................................................126
2.2 Salinity, Temperature and Sound Velocity Determination ......................................127
2.2.1 Instrumentation.........................................................................................127
2.2.2 Instrument operation.................................................................................127
2.2.3 Data recording and processing .................................................................128
2.2.4 Sound velocity computation .....................................................................128
2.3 Sea water sound propagation ....................................................................................128
2.3.1 Attenuation ...............................................................................................128
2.3.2 Refraction and reflection ..........................................................................129
2.4 Acoustic parameters..................................................................................................130
2.4.1 Frequency .................................................................................................130
2.4.2 Band width................................................................................................131
2.4.3 Pulse length ..............................................................................................131
3. Motion Sensors ..................................................................................................................132
3.1 Principles of operation ..............................................................................................133
3.1.1 Inertial sensors..........................................................................................133
3.1.2 Inertial sensors with the integration of GPS information .........................133
3.2 Roll, pitch and heave measurement ..........................................................................133
3.3 Heading ..................................................................................................................134
3.4 Accuracy of measurement.........................................................................................134
4. Transducers ..................................................................................................................135
4.1 Classification with Regard to Operation...................................................................135
4.1.1 Magnetostrictive .......................................................................................135
M-13
vi
4.1.2 Piezoelectric .............................................................................................135

4.1.3 Electrostrictive..........................................................................................136
4.2 Beam width ...............................................................................................................136
4.3 Classification with Regard to Beam .........................................................................143
4.3.1 Single Beam..............................................................................................143
4.3.2 Multibeam.................................................................................................144
4.4 Classification with Regard to installation .................................................................144
4.4.1 Keel mounted............................................................................................145
4.4.2 Towed .......................................................................................................145
4.4.3 Portable.....................................................................................................145
4.5 Coverage ...................................................................................................................147
5. Acoustic Systems ..................................................................................................................148
5.1 Single beam echo sounders.......................................................................................148
5.1.1 Principles of operation..............................................................................148
5.1.2 Installation and calibration .......................................................................152
5.1.3 Operation and data recording ...................................................................154
5.1.4 Source of errors and quality control techniques .......................................154
5.2 Swath Systems ..........................................................................................................166
5.2.1 Multibeam systems ...................................................................................166
5.2.2 Interferometric sonars...............................................................................180
6. Non acoustic systems............................................................................................................181
6.1 Airborne Laser Systems............................................................................................181
6.1.2 Capabilities and limitations ......................................................................183
6.2 Airborne Electromagnetic Systems...........................................................................183
6.2.2 Capabilities and limitations ......................................................................184
6.3 Remote Sensing ........................................................................................................184
6.3.1 Photobathymetry.......................................................................................185
6.3.2 Others .......................................................................................................185
6.4 Mechanic Systems ....................................................................................................186
6.4.1 Lead Line and sounding pole....................................................................186
6.4.2 Bar sweep .................................................................................................187
6.4.3 Wire sweep ...............................................................................................188
References ..................................................................................................................189
Bibliography ..................................................................................................................191
Annex A Reference and Corodinate Systems.......................................................................195
CHAPTER 4 “SEAFLOOR CLASSIFICATION AND FEATURE DETECTION” .................199

1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................199
2. Seafloor Feature Detection..................................................................................................199
2.1 Background...............................................................................................................199
2.2 Standards ..................................................................................................................199
2.2.2 IHO S-44 – Minimum Standards for Hydrographic Surveys ...................199
2.2.3 IHO S-57 – Transfer Standards for Digital Hydrographic Data ...............200
2.2.4 Detection of Hazardous Features..............................................................201
2.2.5 Military Requirements..............................................................................202
2.2.6 Reporting Features....................................................................................202
2.3 Methods of feature detection ....................................................................................202
2.3.1 Overview ..................................................................................................202
M-13
vii
2.3.2 Sidescan Sonar (SSS) ...............................................................................203

2.3.3 Theoretical Considerations .......................................................................204
2.3.4 Operational Constraints ............................................................................206
2.3.5 Distortions of Sonar Records....................................................................208
2.3.6 Feature Detection......................................................................................210
2.3.7 Calculation of Speed of Advance (SOA)..................................................212
2.3.8 Track-Keping Errors.................................................................................214
2.3.9 Practical use of Sidescan Sonar ................................................................214
2.3.10 Positions Errors of Sonar Contacts...........................................................218
2.3.11 Plotting and Measurements from Sonar Records .....................................219
2.3.12 Multibeam Echosounders (MBES)...........................................................220
2.3.13 Considerations when using MBES ...........................................................221
2.3.14 Magnetometer...........................................................................................222
2.3.15 Other Methods of Feature Detection ........................................................223
2.3.16 Obtaining Definitive Least Depth over a Feature.....................................223
2.3.17 Echosounder Least Depth.........................................................................224
2.3.18 Use of Divers ............................................................................................224
2.3.19 Other Methods ..........................................................................................225
2.3.20 Methods of Wire Sweeping Wrecks .........................................................225
2.4 Sidescan Sonar records .............................................................................................226
2.4.2 Wreck Records .........................................................................................227
2.4.3 Sonar Coverage Records ..........................................................................228
3. Seafloor Characterisation ...................................................................................................230
3.1 Background...............................................................................................................230
3.1.2 Seafloor Characterisation Models ............................................................231
3.1.3 Seafloor Samples ......................................................................................232
3.1.4 Nature of the Seafloor...............................................................................232
3.1.5 Classifying Samples .................................................................................233
3.1.6 Methods of Obtaining Seafloor Samples..................................................234
3.1.7 Seafloor Sample Records..........................................................................236
3.2 Classification Sensors ...............................................................................................236
3.3 Classification - Theory..............................................................................................237
3.3.2 Backscatter Imagery .................................................................................237
3.3.3 Sidescan Registration ...............................................................................238
3.3.4 Mosaicing .................................................................................................238
3.3.5 Classification - General ............................................................................239
3.3.6 RoxAnn.....................................................................................................240
3.3.7 Classification using MBES.......................................................................241
3.3.8 Textural Mapping .....................................................................................242
3.3.9 Power Spectra ...........................................................................................242
3.3.10 Grey level Co-occurrence Matrices ..........................................................243
3.3.11 Echo Amplitude Peak Probality Density Function ...................................243
3.3.12 Angular Dependence ................................................................................244
3.3.13 Acoustic Backscatter Data Interpretation .................................................245
3.3.14 Military Classification Models .................................................................246
References ..................................................................................................................252
CHAPTER 5 “WATER LEVELS AND FLOW” .........................................................................253

1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................253
2. Tides and Water Levels .......................................................................................................253
2.1 Principles of Tides and Water Levels .......................................................................253
M-13
viii
2.1.1 Astronomical Tide Producing Forces .......................................................253

2.1.2 Tidal Characteristics .................................................................................258
2.1.3 Non-Tidal Water Level Variations ...........................................................266
2.1.4 Tide and Water Level Datums..................................................................267
2.1.5 Harmonis Analysis and Tide Prediction ...................................................268
2.2 Operational Support Functions .................................................................................274
2.2.1 Error Budget Considerations ....................................................................275
2.2.2 Tide and Water Level Requirement Planning ..........................................275
2.2.3 Preliminary Tide and Water Level Zoning...............................................277
2.2.4 Control Water Level Station Operation....................................................279
2.2.5 Supplemental Water Level Station Requirements....................................279
2.2.6 Data Processing and Tabulation ...............................................................284
2.2.7 Computation of Tidal Datums ..................................................................287
2.2.8 Final Zoning and Tide Reducers ..............................................................290
2.2.9 Using Kinematic GPS for Vertical Control ..............................................292
3. Water Level Flow and Tidal Currents...............................................................................293
3.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................293
3.2 Principles of Tidal Currents ......................................................................................293
3.3 Measurements of Currents ........................................................................................295
3.4 Tidal Current Prediction ...........................................................................................297
References ...............................................................................................................................299
CHAPTER 6 “TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING” ..........................................................................301

1. Introduction..........................................................................................................................301
2. Topography, Coastline Delineation and Aids to Navigation Positioning........................302
2.1 Specifications............................................................................................................302
2.2 Positioning Methods and Accuacies .........................................................................303
2.2.1 GNSS........................................................................................................303
2.2.2 Triangulation ............................................................................................307
2.2.3 Traverse ....................................................................................................311
2.2.4 Intersection and Resection........................................................................319
2.2.5 Usual Algorithms......................................................................................323
2.2.6 Levelling and its Errors ............................................................................330
2.3 Coastal and Harbour Ground Surveys ......................................................................331
2.3.1 Application of Direct Topographic Methods............................................331
2.3.2 Density of points to be surveyed ..............................................................331
2.3.3 Applicable Methods..................................................................................331
2.3.4 Relief Representation ...............................................................................332
3. Remote Sensing ....................................................................................................................333
3.1 Photogrammetry........................................................................................................334
3.1.1 Principles and applications of aerial photographs ....................................335
3.1.2 Aerial Photograph acquisition elements ...................................................337
3.1.3 Flight Planning .........................................................................................338
3.1.4 Restitution.................................................................................................340
3.1.5 Aerotriangulation......................................................................................341
3.1.6 Ground control..........................................................................................344
3.1.7 Stereo plotter generalities. Digital processing ..........................................345
3.1.8 Photo interpretation ..................................................................................346
3.2 Not Photogrammetric Remote Sensing Imagery ......................................................347
3.2.1 Satellite and sensors for earth Resources Remote Sensing.......................348
3.2.2 Main Remote Sensing Systems ................................................................352
M-13
ix
3.2.3 Image Structure and Support ....................................................................358

3.2.4 Interpretation and Processing Fundamentals ............................................360
3.2.5 Image preprocessing and complementary data.........................................362
3.2.6 Image processing ......................................................................................364
3.2.7 Altimetry...................................................................................................372
3.2.8 Cartographic application...........................................................................376
Acronyms ..................................................................................................................381
References ..................................................................................................................383
Web sites ..................................................................................................................386
Bibliography ..................................................................................................................389
Annex A Algorithms for the Transverse Mercator Representation .........................................391

Annex B Commercial Equipment Examples ..............................................................................405
CHAPTER 7 “HYDROGRAPHIC PRACTICE” .........................................................................409

1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................409
2. Hydrographic Survey Planning ..........................................................................................409
2.1 The Hydrographic Project.........................................................................................409
2.2 Assessment of the Survey Task ................................................................................410
2.3 Detailed Survey Planning .........................................................................................412
2.4 Horizontal Control ....................................................................................................412
2.5 Vertical Control ........................................................................................................412
2.6 Tidal Streams ............................................................................................................413
2.7 Sounding ...................................................................................................................413
2.8 Sida Scan Sonar ........................................................................................................414
2.9 Seabed Sampling.......................................................................................................414
2.10 Coastline Delineation, Conspicuous Objects and Topography.................................415
2.11 Ancillary Observations .............................................................................................415
2.12 Surveying Team Organisation ..................................................................................415
2.13 Compilation and Checking of Data...........................................................................416
2.14 Data Rendering Requirements ..................................................................................416
2.15 Operation Programme Development ........................................................................417
2.16 Operation Duration and Cost Estimates....................................................................417
2.17 Liaison with Outside Authorities ..............................................................................417
3. Survey Reconnaissance........................................................................................................418
3.1 General Reconnaissance ...........................................................................................418
3.2 The Geodetic Reconnaissance ..................................................................................418
3.3 The Tidal Reconnaissance ........................................................................................419
4. Data Acquisitionl..................................................................................................................419
4.1 Horizontal Control and Calibration ..........................................................................420
4.1.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................420
4.1.2 Horizontal Control Ashore .......................................................................420
4.1.3 Horizontal Control at Sea .........................................................................421
4.1.4 Field Preparation ......................................................................................422
4.1.5 Alignment and Calibration of Positioning Systems..................................424
4.1.6 Horizontal Control Methods and Equipment............................................425
4.2 Vertical Control and Calibration...............................................................................451
4.2.1 General Description..................................................................................451
4.2.2 Tidal Modelling for RTK Surveys............................................................452
4.3 Environmental Observations.....................................................................................456
4.4 Line Guidance...........................................................................................................457
M-13
x
4.5 Check Lines ..............................................................................................................461

4.6 Main Lines ................................................................................................................461
4.7 Inter-lines and Investigations....................................................................................463
4.8 Ancillary/miscellaneous Observations......................................................................464
5. Coastline Delineation ...........................................................................................................466
5.1 Coastlining General ..................................................................................................466
5.2 Coastal Details Required ..........................................................................................466
5.3 Detail of Concern to the Mariner ..............................................................................467
5.4 Topography...............................................................................................................467
5.5 Delineation of the Drying Line .................................................................................468
5.6 Heights of Land Features ..........................................................................................468
5.7 Charting the Forshore ...............................................................................................468
5.8 Coastline Overlay .....................................................................................................469
5.9 Use of Air Photo Plots ..............................................................................................469
5.10 Coastlining Methods .................................................................................................470
5.11 Plotting the Coastline................................................................................................471
5.12 Coastline Delineation Report....................................................................................471
6. Data Processing ....................................................................................................................472
6.1 Bathymetric...............................................................................................................472
6.2 Seafloor Characterisation..........................................................................................472
6.3 Feature Detection ......................................................................................................474
6.4 Ancillary/miscellaneous Observations......................................................................475
6.5 Compliance with the Plan .........................................................................................475
7. Data Rendering ....................................................................................................................476
7.1 The Report of Survey................................................................................................476
7.2 Data Requirement ....................................................................................................476
7.3 Data Format and Density ..........................................................................................476
7.4 Media Requirement...................................................................................................477
References ..................................................................................................................................478
Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................480
Appendix 1 – Survey Planning and Estimation Guide................................................................483

Appendix 2 – Table 1 – Horizontal Positioning Systems and Selection Criteria ......................487
Appendix 3 – Table 2 – Bandwith Classification of Electronic Positioning Systems
used in Hydrographic Surveying.........................................................................489
Table 3 – Field Application of Electronic Positioning Systems used
in Hydrographic Surveying..................................................................................489
Appendix 4 - System Diagrams.....................................................................................................491
Appendix 5 - Specimen Report of Survey....................................................................................501
__________
M-13
1
INTRODUCTION
BRIEF HISTORY OF HYDROGRAPHY
The oldest navigational chart known today is the Carte Pisane, so named as it was bought in 1829 from a
Pisan family by the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris. It was drawn on an animal skin towards the end of
the 13thC, probably in Genoa where a school of marine cartography had been established; there was a
similar school in Venice, while a third school was developed on the isle of Majorca. Known as
‘portolans’ the charts produced by each of these schools were similar in style and content. The most
striking feature was networks of interconnecting rhumb lines emanating from compass roses representing
32 winds directions, each one of which could be used with dividers to set a ship’s course. The entire
Mediterranean coastline was depicted, the coastal names shown on the land leaving the sea area clear for
track plotting. There were a few symbols including the cross for submerged rock but no depth soundings.
By the 15thC Portuguese and Spanish portolans enabled Mediterranean seamen to sail to southern England
and Flanders to load wool.
For generations the northern seamen had navigated from one headline to another using written directions
and soundings handed down from their forebears, a method of pilotage known as ‘caping the ship’. With
the development of printing Pierre Garcie of Rouen was the first to publish caping information in his
‘Routier de la Mer’, which he illustrated with simple woodcut coastal views.
Cornelius Anthonisz, a draughtsman of Amsterdam realised that woodcut blocks could be used to print
charts on paper, his first being his ‘Karte van Ostland’ of the Baltic and North Seas. Whilst adopting
rhumb lines and other portolan features, he used Ptolomy’s projection which had recently been
rediscovered in Constantinople.
Anthonisz had shown the way but it was Lucas Janszoon Waghenaer of Enkhuizen in Holland who, forty
years on, printed paper charts from copper plate engravings. For many years he had travelled widely as a
sea pilot gathering hydrographic information and when he came ashore at the age of 49 he enlisted fellow
mariners to supply him with such material for compiling his charts. In 1584 Waghenaer published his
great atlas ‘Spieghel der Zeevaerdt’ (Mirror of the Sea) containing 45 charts covering the European coasts
from Norway to the Strait of Gibraltar. He introduced many new features such as coastal recognition
profiles behind the coastlines; reducing the distances between harbours so that their approaches could be
shown on a larger scale; the introduction of symbols for buoys, beacons, church spires etc. and soundings
reduced to their depth at half tide.
Waghenaer had made the great breakthrough in producing a paper chart designed by a seaman for
seamen. He had a number of Dutch followers so that, for over 100 years, Dutch charts were widely
available, even of British waters; eventually King Charles decided that the whole of Britain’s coasts and
harbours should be surveyed.
For this massive task he selected a naval officer named Greenville Collins, granted him the title
‘Hydrographer to the King’ and provided him with the yacht Merlin. The work began in 1681 and took
eleven years.
M-13
2
There was no general topographic map of the Kingdom to which Collins could relate his charts, nor did
he have any method of finding his longitude and only the quadrant to assess his latitude; his soundings
reduced to low water were fixed by compass bearings of shore marks which in turn were fixed by
compass and measuring chain. In 1693 the resulting charts were published in an atlas entitled ‘Great
Britain’s Coasting Pilot’, which contained 47 charts and 30 pages of tide tables, sailing directions and
coastal views. Precisely engraved, the charts included soundings and leading lines for harbour entry etc.
The Pilot appealed to British seamen, a further twenty editions being published during the next hundred
years.
During the 16thC a school of hydrography was formed in Dieppe by the many sea pilots who sailed to
distant shores. In 1661 Jean Baptiste Colbert became Chief Minister to Louis XIV and among his many
tasks was that of revitalising the French Navy. He not only took over the Dieppe school but established
similar hydrographic centres in a number of other French ports. This enabled him to have surveys made of
the whole French coastline, every chart being directly connected to the national triangulation established
by the Cassini dynasty.
Colbert’s cadre of hydrographers were working in New France and the mass of material coming from
Quebec led to the establishment in Paris of the ‘Dépôt Général des Cartes et Plans’, now recognised as the
first national Hydrographic Office. Denmark was the next nation to establish a Hydrographic Office,
followed closely by the British in 1795; a further twenty or so countries established such offices in 19thC.
About 1775 two British surveyors, Murdoch Mackenzie and his nephew of the same name were largely
responsible for the invention of the station pointers, a device with which a vessel’s position could be
precisely plotted by the observation of two horizontal angles between three fixed marks onshore. This
was a major technical advance which revolutionised sea surveying throughout the 19thC during which the
demands for navigational charts both for war and peace increased dramatically.
Even before World War I a number of national Hydrographers were considering how international co-
operation could lead to the exchange of and the standardisation in chart design. With the end of the War
the British and French Hydrographers jointly called for an international Conference at which delegates
from 22 countries gathered in London in June 1919. Many Resolutions were adopted by the Conference
concerning chart standardisation and finally a Resolution to form an International Hydrographic Office
with three Directors.
H.S.H. Prince Albert I of Monaco, who had been kept in touch with the Proceedings of the Conference,
generously agreed to provide a building in the Principality to house the Bureau where it remains.
The history of hydrography during the 20thC, during which there have been many technical developments,
can be followed in the 75th Anniversary Commemorative Issue of the International Hydrographic Review
dated March 1997.
IMPORTANCE OF HYDROGRAPHY
Firstly it is necessary to consider the IHO definition of Hydrography, which stands as follows:
That branch of applied sciences which deals with the measurement and description of the features
of the seas and coastal areas for the primary purpose of navigation and all other marine purposes
and activities, including –inter alia- offshore activities, research, protection of the environment,
and prediction services. (IHO Pub. S-32)
M-13
3
Therefore, the development of a National Maritime Policy requires a well developed capability to conduct
all these activities which will allow the obtaining of basic knowledge of the geographical, geological and
geophysical features of the seabed and coast, as well the currents, tides and certain physical properties of
the sea water; all of this data must then be properly processed so that the nature of the sea bottom, its
geographical relationship with the land and the characteristics and dynamics of the ocean can be
accurately depicted in all zones of national shipping. In brief, Hydrography, as defined, is the key to
progress on all maritime activities, normally of great national economic importance.
To adequately address areas of safe and efficient operation of maritime traffic control; coastal zone
management; exploration and exploitation of marine resources; environmental protection and maritime
defence, it is necessary to create a Hydrographic Service. The Hydrographic Service, through systematic
data collection carried out on the coast and at sea, produces and disseminates information in support of
maritime navigation safety and marine environment preservation, defence and exploitation.
To adequately address areas such as:
• Safe and efficient operation of maritime traffic control;

• Coastal Zone Management;
• Exploration and Exploitation of Marine Resources;
• Environmental Protection;
• Maritime Defence.
It is necessary to create a Hydrographic Service. The Hydrographic Service, through systematic data
collection carried out on the coast and at sea, produces and disseminates information in support of
maritime navigation safety and marine environment preservation, defence and exploitation.
FIELDS OF COMPETENCE ASSOCIATED WITH HYDROGRAPHY
Maritime Transport
More than 80% of international trade in the world is carried by sea. Maritime commerce is a basic
element for a nation's economy. Many areas and ports in the world do not have accurate nor adequate
nautical chart coverage. Modern nautical charts are required for safe navigation through a country's
waters and along coasts and to enter its ports. A lack of adequate nautical charts prevents the
development of maritime trade in the waters and ports of the concerned nations.
The shipping industry needs efficiency and safety. Poorly charted areas and the lack of information can
cause voyages to be longer than necessary, and may prevent the optimum loading of ships, thus increasing
costs. The saving of time and money resulting from the use of shorter and deeper routes and the
possibility to use larger ships or load ships more deeply may produce important economies for national
industry and commerce. It is also very important to note that the SOLAS Convention Chapter V
considers a ship unseaworthy if it does not carry up-to-date charts necessary for the intended voyage.
A solution to these problems would not be possible without the quality maps and charts produced and
continually updated and distributed by a Hydrographic Service. These charts, produced by means of
modern hydrographic surveys, are required to enable the larger ships of today to navigate through national
waters and enter ports the access to which was formerly insecure and therefore are essential tools for the
creation of coastal nations' incomes.
M-13
4
Modern charts also provide information required to create the routeing systems established by
international conventions and to meet the economic interests of the coastal state.
Coastal Zone Management
Adequate coastal zone management includes items such as construction of new ports and the maintenance
and development of existing ones; dredging operations for the maintenance of charted depths and for the
establishment, monitoring and improvement of channels; control of coastal erosion; land reclamation
from the sea; establishment and monitoring of dumping grounds for industrial waste; extraction of
mineral deposits; aquacultural activities; transportation and public works projects including construction
of near shore infrastructure.
Precise large-scale surveys provide the primary data essential for projects involving all items mentioned
above. Due to the rapid changes to which shorelines are subject, these surveys must be updated with the
frequency dictated by the monitoring and analysis process. The information collected by Hydrographic
Offices about the coastal zone provides essential input to coastal zone GIS (Geographic Information
Systems) which are increasingly being used for better overall management and decision-making with
regard to conflicting uses within the coastal region. The users of hydrographic information go beyond the
traditional user group, mariners, to include government agencies, coastal managers, engineers, and
scientists.
Exploration and exploitation of marine resources
Although intended primarily to support safety of navigation, the extensive data-bases amassed over the
years by Hydrographic Offices, together with their various products and services, are of considerable
economic value in assisting the management and exploitation of natural marine resources. In recent
years, it has become more evident that inadequate hydrographic services not only restrict the growth of
maritime trade but also lead to costly delays in resource exploration.
Coastal and offshore sedimentary areas may contain mineral deposits, in particular hydrocarbons, which
require adequate surveys in order to be identified. If the existence of these hydrocarbons is confirmed,
this will lead to the coastal nation's undertaking development of hydrocarbon production which implies
interpretation of the sea floor morphology; navigation safety for the transportation of these hazardous
cargoes; safety of offshore platforms and related sea floor transmission systems and the placement of
production wells and the laying of pipelines. Bathymetric, tidal and meteorological data provided by a
Hydrographic Service is a fundamental element in the development of a hydrocarbon industry.
The fishing industry is also a source of national wealth. Fishermen need marine information not only for
the safe navigation of their vessels but also for safe deployment of their fishing gear, which will prevent
costly losses. In addition, oceanographic charts, compiled and produced by Hydrographic Offices, are
now being extensively used by the fishing industry.
Fishery activities need detailed charts in order to:
- avoid loss of fishing gear and fishing vessels on undetected or poorly charted
obstructions;
- identify fishing areas;
- locate areas where fishing is limited or prohibited.
M-13
5
This kind of information is subject to frequent changes and therefore needs constant updating.
Hydrographic surveying is essential to obtain timely and up-to-date information and should be
periodically repeated.
The trend of modern fishery science is orientated towards habitat management; bathymetry and other
ocean data will provide important input for proper species management and development.
Environment Protection and Management
An essential factor for the protection of the environment is safe and accurate navigation. Pollution caused
by wrecks and oil spills are a major damage factor, the economic consequences of which are more
devastating than is commonly imagined, but which, in some cases, have been estimated at US $ 3 billion
for a single incident.
The value of navigation services for the protection of the marine environment has been internationally
recognized. In this respect, it should be noted that Chapter 17 of Agenda 21 of the United Nations
Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED), held in 1992, recognized that
"Hydrographic charting is vitally important to navigational safety"
Marine Science
Marine science depends largely on bathymetric information. Global tide and circulation models, local
and regional models for a wide variety of scientific studies, marine geology/geophysics, the
deployment/placement of scientific instrumentation and many other aspects of marine science depend on
bathymetry provided by Hydrographic Services.
National Spatial Data Infrastructure
In the information age it is realised by governments that good quality and well managed spatial data are
an essential ingredient to economic and commercial development, and to environmental protection. For
this reason many nations are establishing national spatial data infrastructures, bringing together the
services and data sets of major national spatial data providers, for example topography, geodesy,
geophysics, meteorology, and bathymetry. The Hydrographic Service is an important part of the national
spatial data infrastructure.
Maritime Boundary Delimitation
Good hydrographic data is essential to proper delimitation of the maritime boundaries as detailed in the
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
Maritime Defense
Navies are major users of nautical chart products in that they must be prepared for deployment to many
areas in the world and typically must maintain a large set of charts. The unique risks associated with the
carriage of munitions and nuclear material make it important for such vessels to have up-to-date
information. The marine data and information provided by national Hydrographic Offices support a
variety of products used in naval operations. Surface, submarine, anti-submarine, mine-hunting and air-
sea naval operations need nautical information products very different one from another. Hydrographic
and oceanographic data necessary for the preparation of such products must be available if national
investment in defence is to be optimised.
M-13
6
Tourism
Good charts are particularly important to the development of the economically important industry of
tourism, especially involving cruise ships. The potential of the cruise ship industry is especially
important to developing nations. Yet this important source of revenue cannot be properly developed if
safe navigation to remote touristic landscapes is prevented or limited by a lack of adequate charts.
Tourism is one of the major growth industries of the 21st Century.
Recreational boating
The recreational boating community represents a large percentage of mariners. It is generally not
mandatory for leisure craft to carry charts and recreational mariners often do not update their charts;
however, the advent of digital chart information is making it possible for the recreational user to have
updated chart information readily available along with many types of value added information such as
marina locations, etc. This development is likely to result in the recreational leisure sector becoming a
significantly larger user of the hydrographic data as greater numbers of people become able to afford boat
ownership. Again income from this sector is increasingly significant to many countries.
As it can be seen, it is extremely difficult to quantify the economic and commercial benefits which flow
from a national hydrographic programme, but several studies by IHO Member States have suggested that
the cost to benefit ratio is about 1:10 for major maritime nations. It is also true that volumes of maritime
trade are growing continuously and, in the future, the exploitation and sustainable development of the
national maritime zones will become a major pre-occupation of government and industry.
It should also be noted that, in economic parlance, the national hydrographic programme is regarded as a
"Public Good". That is to say the necessary services required in the public interest will not be supplied at
optimal levels by market forces alone. In every IHO Member State the provision of hydrographic
services is a responsibility of central government, as an essential component of national economic
development. This overall and important economic dimension of the work has sometimes been obscured
by the emphasis on sector interests served by hydrographic services, and more recently by legislative or
regulatory requirements. It is clear that the economic dimension of Hydrography deserves greater
attention than it has received in the past.
__________
M-13
7
CHAPTER 1
PRINCIPLES OF HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYING
1. INTRODUCTION
Hydrographic surveying deals with the configuration of the bottom and adjacent land areas of oceans,
lakes, rivers, harbours, and other water forms on Earth. In strict sense, it is defined merely as the
surveying of a water area; however, in modern usage it may include a wide variety of other objectives
such as measurements of tides, current, gravity, earth magnetism, and determinations of the physical and
chemical properties of water. The principal objective of most hydrographic surveys, is to obtain basic
data for the compilation of nautical charts with emphasis on the features that may affect safe navigation.
Other objectives include acquiring the information necessary for related marine navigational products and
1
for coastal zone management, engineering, and science .
2
The purpose of hydrographic surveying is :
• To collect, with systematic surveys at sea, along the coast and inland, georeferenced data related to:
♦ Shoreline configuration, including man made infrastructure for maritime navigation i.e. all those
features on shore that are of interest to mariners.
♦ Depths in the area of interest (including all potential hazards to navigation and other marine
activities).
♦ Sea bottom composition.
♦ Tides and Currents.
♦ Physical properties of the water column.
• To process the information collected in order to create organized databases capable of feeding the
production of thematic maps, nautical charts and other types of documentation for the following most
common uses :
♦ Maritime navigation and traffic management.

♦ Naval operations.
♦ Coastal zone management.
♦ Marine environment preservation.
♦ Exploitation of marine resources and laying of submarine cables/pipelines.
♦ Maritime boundaries definition (Law of the Sea implementation).
♦ Scientific studies.
Mariners have unquestioning faith in nautical charts and where no dangers are shown, they believe that
none exist. Nautical chart is an end product of a hydrographic survey. Its accuracy and adequacy depend
on the quality of the data collected during the surveys3. A nautical chart is a graphic portrayal of the
1
NOAA Hydrographic Manual Part-1, Edition July 4, 1976, P-1-3, www.thsoa.org/pdf/hm1976/part1ch123.pdf
2
International Hydrographic Organisation, Monaco, National Maritime Policies and Hydrographic
Services (M-2), P-13.
3
NOAA Hydrographic manual Part-1, Edition July 4, 1976, P-1-3, www.thsoa.org/pdf/hm1976/part1ch123.pdf
M-13
8
marine environment; showing the nature and form of the coast, depths of the water and general character
and configuration of the sea bottom, locations of dangers to navigation, rise and fall of the tides, cautions
of manmade aids to navigation, and the characteristics of the Earth’s magnetism. The actual form of a
chart may vary from a traditional paper chart to an electronic chart.
An electronic chart is not simply a digital version of a paper chart; it introduces a new navigation
methodology with capabilities and limitations very different from paper charts. The electronic chart has
become the legal equivalent of the paper chart as approved by the International Maritime Organization.
Divergences in purpose have led to the publication of various “new-generation” charts. Bathymetric
charts developed from digital data or created from multi-beam sounding data allow the underwater relief
to be visualised by means of varying blue tints and isobaths. Similarly, side-scan sonar mosaics have
been published in the form of charts or atlases to characterise the large geomorphological structures.
Such charts no longer have, as their object, the safety of navigation, but rather, the knowledge of the
environment required for submarine navigation, oceanographic research or industrial applications, such as
cable laying, seabed mining and oil exploitation.
Hydrographic surveying is undergoing fundamental changes in measurement technology. Multibeam

acoustic and airborne laser systems now provide almost total seafloor coverage and measurement as
compared to the earlier sampling by bathymetric profiles. The capability to position the data precisely in
the horizontal plane has been increased enormously by the availability of satellite positioning systems,
particularly when augmented by differential techniques. This advance in technology has been particularly
significant since navigators are now able to position themselves with greater accuracy than that of the data
4
on which older charts are based .
2. HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYING
2.1 Survey Specifications
Requirements for hydrographic surveys arise as the result of policy decisions, product user reports or
requests, national defence needs, and other demands. The inception of a specific hydrographic survey
project follows an evaluation of all known requirements and the establishment of priorities. Among the
many objective and subjective factors that influence the establishment of priorities are national and
agency goal, quantitative and qualitative measures of shipping and boating, the adequacy of existing
5
surveys, and the rate of change of the submarine topography in the area .
To accommodate in a systematic manner different accuracy requirements for areas to be surveyed, four
orders of survey are defined by IHO in publication S-44 edition 98. These are described in subsequent
paragraphs. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the overall, requirements and are in fact the essence of the
6
complete standard .
2.1.1 Special Order hydrographic surveys approach engineering standards and their use is intended to
be restricted to specific critical areas with minimum under keel clearance and where bottom
characteristics are potentially hazardous to vessels. These areas have to be explicitly designated by the
agency responsible for survey quality. Examples are harbours, berthing areas, and associated critical
channels. All error sources must be minimized. Special Order requires the use of closely spaced lines in
4
International Hydrographic Organisation, Monaco, National Maritime Policies and Hydrographic
Services (M-2), P-19.
5
NOAA Hydrographic manual Part-1, Edition July 4, 1976, P-2-1, www.thsoa.org/pdf/hm1976/part1ch123.pdf
6
International Hydrographic Organisation, Monaco, IHO Standards for Hydrographic Surveys (S-44),
P-14-8, fourth edition 1998.
M-13
9
conjunction with side scan sonar, multi-transducer arrays or high resolution multibeam echosounders to
obtain 100% bottom search. It must be ensured that cubic features greater than 1m can be discerned by
the sounding equipment. The use of side scan sonar in conjunction with a multibeam echosounder may
be necessary in areas where thin and dangerous obstacles may be encountered.
2.1.2 Order 1 hydrographic surveys are intended for harbours, harbour approach channels,
recommended tracks, inland navigation channels, and coastal areas of high commercial traffic density
where under keel clearance is less critical and the geophysical properties of the seafloor are less
hazardous to vessels (e.g. soft silt or sandy bottom). Order 1 surveys should be limited to areas with less
than 100 m water depth. Although the requirement for seafloor search is less stringent than for Special
Order, full bottom search is required in selected areas where the bottom characteristics and the risk of
obstructions are potentially hazardous to vessels. For these areas searched, it must be ensured that cubic
features greater than 2 m up to 40 m water depth or greater than 10% of the depth in areas deeper than 40
m can be discerned by the sounding equipment.
2.1.3 Order 2 hydrographic surveys are intended for areas with depths less than 200 m not covered by
Special Order and Order 1 and where a general description of the bathymetry is sufficient to ensure there
are no obstructions on the seafloor that will endanger the type of vessel expected to transit or work the
area. It is the criteria for a variety of maritime uses for which higher order hydrographic surveys cannot
be justified. Full bottom search may be required in selected areas where the bottom characteristics and the
risk of obstructions may be potentially hazardous to vessels.
2.1.4 Order 3 hydrographic surveys are intended for all areas not covered by Special Order, and
Orders 1 and 2 in water depths in excess of 200 m.
Notes:
For Special Order and Order 1 surveys the agency responsible for the survey quality may define a depth
limit beyond which a detailed investigation of the seafloor is not required for safety of navigation
purposes.
Side scan sonar should not be used for depth determination but to define areas requiring more detailed
and accurate investigation.
TABLE 1.1
Summary of Minimum Standards for Hydrographic Surveys
ORDER Special 1 2 3
Examples of Harbours, berthing Harbours, harbour Areas not described Offshore areas not
Typical Areas areas, and approach channels, in Special Order and described in Special
associated critical recommended tracks Order 1, or areas up Order, and Orders 1
channels with and some coastal areas to 200 m water depth and 2
minimum under with depths up to 100
keel clearances m
Horizontal 2m 5 m + 5% of depth 20 m + 5% of depth 150 m + 5% of depth

Accuracy (95%
Confidence
Level)
M-13
10
ORDER Special 1 2 3
Depth Accuracy a = 0.25 m a = 0.5 m a = 0.1.0 m Same as Order 2
for Reduced b.= 0.0075 b.= 0.013 b.= 0.023
Depths (95%
Confidence
Level) (1)
100% Bottom Compulsory (2) Required in selected May be required in Not applicable
Search areas (2) selected areas
System Cubic features > 1 Cubic features > 2 m Same as Order 1 Not applicable
Detection m in depths up to 40 m;
Capability 10% of depth beyond
40 m (3)
Maximum Line Not applicable, as 3 x average depth or 3-4 x average depth 4 x average depth
spacing (4) 100% search 25 m, whichever is or 200 m, whichever
compulsory greater is greater
(1) To calculate the error limits for depth accuracy the corresponding values of ‘a’ and ‘b’ listed
in Table 1 have to be introduced into the formula
± √ [a2 +(b*d)2]
with
a constant depth error, i.e. the sum of all constant errors
b*d depth dependent error, i.e. the sum of all depth dependent errors
b factor of depth dependent error
d depth
(2) For safety of navigation purposes, the use of an accurately specified mechanical sweep to
guarantee a minimum safe clearance depth throughout an area may be considered sufficient
for Special Order and Order 1 surveys.
(3) The value of 40 m has been chosen considering the maximum expected draught of vessels.
(4) The line spacing can be expanded if procedures for ensuring an adequate sounding density
are used
The rows of Table 1 are explained as follows:
- Row 1 "Examples of Typical Areas" gives examples of areas to which an order of

survey might typically be applied.
- Row 2 "Horizontal Accuracy" lists positioning accuracies to be achieved to meet each

order of survey.
- Row 3 "Depth Accuracy" specifies parameters to be used to calculate accuracies of
reduced depths to be achieved to meet each order of survey.
- Row 4 "100% Bottom Search" specifies occasions when full bottom search should be
conducted.
M-13
11
- Row 5 "System Detection Capability" specifies the detection capabilities of systems

used for bottom search.
- Row 6 "Maximum Line Spacing" is to be interpreted as
- spacing of sounding lines for single beam sounders, and
- distance between the outer limits of swaths for swath sounding systems.
2.2 Survey Planning
Survey planning covers a wide range of activities from the development of an idea for a survey within the
Hydrographic Office and its subsequent issue as Project Instructions / Hydrographic Instructions (HIs), to
the detailed planning and organisation of a surveying ship to fulfil a practical task. It covers inter
departmental liaison at Government level, diplomatic cooperation and the allocation of numerous
expensive resources. It also covers prioritization of resources and day to day running of a survey ship
employed on surveying task. Survey planning involves blending of these activities into a coherent pattern
aimed at the achievement of a specific task.
A survey begins long before actual data collection starts. Some elements, which must be decided, are7:
• Exact area of the survey.

• Type of survey (reconnaissance or standard) and scale to meet standards of chart to be produced.
• Scope of the survey (short or long term).
• Platforms available (ships, launches, aircraft, leased vessels, cooperative agreements).
• Support work required (aerial or satellite photography, geodetics, tides).
• Limiting factors (budget, political or operational constraints, positioning systems limitations,
logistics).
Once these issues are decided, all information available in the survey area is reviewed. This includes
aerial photography, satellite data, topographic maps, existing nautical charts, geodetic information, tidal
information, and anything else affecting the survey. HO will normally undertake this strategic planning of
surveys in cooperation with other organisations and, from this, Projects Instructions / Hydrographic
Instructions (HIs) will be compiled by the Hydrographer and issued for compliance. Details provided in
Project Instructions / HIs will include some or all of the following, depending on the type of survey
8
required :
• Survey limits.
• Data requirement and resolution.
• Method of positional control, together with the accuracy expected.
• Use to be made of sonar.
• How the survey report is to be rendered and target date if appropriate.
• A general, and at times detailed, description of the reason for the survey priorities, methods to be
employed, particular observations to be made and other relevant guidance or instruction.
In addition, appendices to HIs will give instruction or guidance on the following:
• Horizontal datum, projection and grid to be used.

• Wrecks in the area.
7
Bowditch -The American Practical Navigator, P-411, http://www.irbs.com/bowditch/
8
Admiralty, General Instructions for Hydrographic Surveys (GIHS), Sixth Edition, 1992, P- 5-3.
M-13
12
• Tidal datum and observations required.

• Particular instructions regarding the collection of data in respect of oceanography, geophysics,
sailing directions, air photography etc.
On receipt of Project Instructions/HIs, the survey planners then compile sound velocity information,
climatology, water clarity data, any past survey data, and information from lights lists, sailing directions,
and notices to mariners. Tidal information is thoroughly reviewed and tide gauge locations chosen. Local
vertical control data is reviewed to see if it meets the expected accuracy standards, so the tide gauges can
be linked to the vertical datum used for the survey. Horizontal control is reviewed to check for accuracy
and discrepancies and to determine sites for local positioning systems to be used in the survey.
Development of a general survey plan and subsequent site specific survey plans will create a more
efficient survey. The general survey plan addresses the way that surveys are planned, performed, and
processed. This plan must be well thought out and robust to account for as many contingencies as
possible. This plan includes training, software, equipment maintenance and upgrades, logistics, all data
requirements, schedule, safety, and weather. The site specific survey plan will address local notifications,
survey lines, datum, data density, and specific equipment and personnel that will meet the general survey
plan requirements. Few are described below:
• Training of surveyors should be catered during a survey operation in order to ensure appropriate
competencies are maintained.
• Data logging and processing software are critical in a survey operation. These should be user friendly
and personnel employed on these need to be well conversant with its all functions.
• Suitable survey platform and equipment should be selected. Some equipment will lend itself to
particular types of surveys and others will be more general in use. It is paramount that a proper
selection is made.
• The purpose for the survey will usually dictate the data requirement (density, coverage, and
precision). However, if there are no impact to cost and schedule, then as many requirements should be
addressed as possible.
• Schedule is often a critical element in a hydrographic survey. The data requirement usually has as a
specific deliverable date assigned, such that the survey data collection and processing occur within a
very specific time frame. This requires that the personnel and equipment resources be adequate to
meet this need. In some cases, if the schedule cannot be met, then the survey simply will not be
requested and other sources will be used. Considering this, it is important to plan and analyze all
aspects of a general survey plan with the ability to meet schedule as a prime element.
• Safety is the primary consideration. It is incumbent on the person in charge in the field to evaluate
every situation for possible hazards. If there is an identified hazard, then it needs to be addressed
before continuing with the activity.
• Notifications to the local authorities / harbourmaster office should be made with enough time to allow
them to notify the local mariners.
• Survey lines for multibeam surveys should follow the contours of the harbour bottom. This will
reduce the changes in bottom coverage created by different water depths. However, when using a
single beam survey system, the lines should run perpendicular to contours. This will help in
M-13
13
determining changes in the bottom relief. Multibeam survey lines also need to be spaced so as to
achieve the proper amount of overlap or data density to meet the survey standard.
• An integral part of the data of a survey is the reference datum. It is required, by good survey practice,
to clearly indicate by note on the published survey the actual vertical and horizontal reference used,
and the procedures used to establish the datum for the survey. WGS-84 is being used worldwide.
• Data density will vary based on method of survey, water depth, and need. The method of survey will
be determined by equipment available for the survey, the personnel, and survey site conditions. If
only a single beam survey system is available, then data density will be less. With a multibeam
system, the greater the water depth the less dense the data will be, unless multiple passes are made.
The type of survey will dictate the data redundancy or data overlap requirements.
• It is important to standardize the equipment as much as possible to limit training, maintenance and
overheads.
2.3 Data Gathering
Data gathering is dependent upon various factors. The survey requirements, the platform and equipment
available and the time specified for a particular task will determine the amount of data to be collected. A
large amount of data can be collected using latest hydrographic software’s and tools like multibeam echo
sounders. In particular, the purpose of the survey will usually dictate the data requirement (data density,
data coverage, and data precision). However, if there is no impact to cost and schedule, then as many data
may be collected as possible during field survey. The data collection be made in methodical manner
starting from one side of the area ending on other.
It should be noted that data redundancy and data density are not the same thing. Data density is the
number of soundings per unit of area, while data redundancy refers to data overlap or data collected at a
different time at the same location. The type of survey defines data redundancy or data overlap
requirements. Full coverage surveys deal more with data density insuring that all bottom
features/obstructions have been located. These need to be clearly understood by those requesting the
survey and those doing the survey to insure compliance with the standards specified by IHO.
2.4 Data Processing
Data processing must be done under strict quality control criteria. Hydrographic data is either collected by
automated systems or converted into an automated format. Final data processing and plotting are
accomplished using onboard or office-based computer systems. A standard approach for a hydrographic
9
survey is the collect-process-collect methodology . The data collected is processed and subsequently gaps
and areas with questionable data re-surveyed. Most of the hydrographic systems are capable of
performing “field-finish” operations, wherein survey data is collected, processed, plotted and analyzed in
the field. Comprehensive survey planning is required for an integrated approach that generates the base
line for all real-time and post processing operation with the system. An example of such a model is given
10
below :
9
B. Bourgeois, F. Petry, M. Harris & P. Alleman, “A GIS Integration Approach for Dynamically Reconfigurable Surveys”,
The Hydrographic Journal, January 1999, P 3-10.
10
Pentti Junni & Ralf Lindgren, “The Hydrophic Information System – Co-operation, Concept and Future”, Finish Maritime
Administration, http://www.esri.com/library/userconf/proc97/proc97/pap619/p619.html
M-13
14
Data + Process = Job
Job Progress Log

b
Source Document
Process
Process steps
Features/Raw Data
Fig. 1.1 "Data Processing model"
This model describes the different processes that can ideally handle the hydrographic information. The
process contains several steps. The comments of each process step along with results, statistics should be
recorded in a progress log. Further, the source and general quality information of any new data be
described in source document which is stored in the database.
The core requirement of data processing is the generation of valid data; which has been sufficiently
processed i.e. undergone through various procedures at various stages or represented so that evaluation
can be made. These procedures/processing steps could be applied in real-time or during post processing
but have to ensure that the final product meets the standards and specifications defined by IHO.
Care is to be exercised in processing the raw data. It is to be ensured that all errors have been eliminated
and necessary corrections e.g. system calibration factors and sensor offsets, or variable values such as
sound velocity profiles and tide values for the reduction of soundings, have been applied. The processing
should strive to use all available sources of information to confirm the presence of navigationally
significant soundings and quality data. Few processing steps outlined below are only to be interpreted as
11
an indication, also with regard to their sequence, and are not necessarily exhaustive :
• Position: Merging of positioning data from different sensors (if necessary), qualifying
positioning data, and eliminating position jumps.
• Depth corrections: Corrections should be applied for water level changes, measurements of
attitude sensors, and changes of the draught of the survey vessel (e. g. squat changing with speed;
change over time caused by fuel consumption). It should be possible to re-process data for which
corrections were applied in real-time.
• Attitude corrections: Attitude data (heading, pitch, roll) should be qualified and data jumps be
eliminated.
11
IHO, Monaco, Circular Letter 45/2001, “Guidelines for the Processing of High Volume Bathymetric Data”, Para-3.2, dated
5 Oct 01.
M-13
15
• Sound velocity: Corrections due to refraction be calculated and applied; If these corrections
have already been applied in real-time during the survey, it should be possible to override them
by using another sound velocity profile with the advent of MBES, the application of S V has
become critical.
• Merging positions and depths: The time offset (latency) and the geometric offset between
sensors have to be taken into consideration.
2.5 Data Analysis
The accuracy of the results of survey measurement should always be quoted to show how good or
reliable they are. Since no equipment is entirely free of errors, therefore, errors are introduced in all
observations. In addition, errors are introduced in computations by approximations in formulae or by
rounding. Observational techniques are designed to eliminate all but small random errors, which can then
be analyzed by rigorous techniques to quantify the accuracy of the observations. Various errors, their
sizes and procedures to eliminate are as under:
ERROR SIZE ELIMINATION

Blunder Large Training, care procedures.
Constant Usually small, but fixed Calibration or procedures
Periodic Usually small, but variable Procedure (repetition), even for
large errors
Random Usually small Only reduced, by repetition
Constant, Systematic and Periodic errors are frequently considered together as ‘Systematic Errors’.
Constant and Systematic errors are accumulative, and thus cannot be reduced by repetition. Random
errors are present in all observations; the result can never be ‘exact’. These errors are as likely to be
positive as negative and more likely to be of small size.
It is important that no method of adjustment can obtain an accurate solution from inaccurate observations.
All errors other than small random ones must be eliminated prior to the adjustment. However, it may be
possible to isolate a ‘systematic’ error by analysis, provided that sufficient data is available. It is clearly
desirable to know when Constant and / or Systematic Errors are present in observations. Constant Errors
are often difficult to detect, and may only become apparent during computation or in special checks, e.g.,
an incorrectly calibrated crystal of a Tellurometer can be detected if that Tellurometer is compared with
another. Periodic and Random Errors however can often be detected by analyzing a series of
observations. The algebraic difference between each observation and the mean of all the observations is
called the Residual of that observation. If only random errors are present, then the Residuals will vary
randomly in magnitude and sign. If systematic errors are present then the magnitudes and / or the signs of
the Residuals will show systematic trends. To assist in data analysis, raw data attributes and metadata
should be mentioned for subsequent evaluation.
2.6 Data Quality
Quality is about “fitness for the use”. It has to do with the extent to which a data set, or map output
satisfied the needs of the person judging it. Error is the difference between actual and true data. Error is a
major issue in quality. It is often used as an umbrella term to describe all the types of the effects that
M-13
16
12
cause data to depart from what they should be . To allow a comprehensive assessment of the quality of
survey data, it is necessary to record or document certain information together with the survey data. Such
information is important to allow exploitation of survey data by a variety of users with different
requirements, especially as requirements may not be known when survey data is collected. The process of
documenting the data quality is called data attribution; the information on the data quality is called
13
metadata. Metadata should comprise at least information on :
• The survey in general as e.g. date, area, equipment used, name of survey platform.
• The geodetic reference system used, i.e. horizontal and vertical datum; including ties to WGS 84
if a local datum is used.
• Calibration procedures and results.
• Sound velocity.
• Tidal datum and reduction.
• Accuracies achieved and the respective confidence levels.
Metadata should preferably be in digital form and an integral part of the survey record. If this is not
feasible similar information should be included in the documentation of a survey. Data quality can be
14
achieved by effective quality control either by automatic or manual means .
• Automatic (Non-interactive) Quality Control: In this, the coordinates (i.e. positions and
depths) obtained should be controlled automatically by a programme using suitable statistical
algorithms which have been documented, tested and demonstrated to produce repeatable and
accurate results.
• Manual (Interactive) Quality Control: In this, the use of 3-D visualisation tools is strongly
recommended. These tools should allow viewing the data using a zoom facility. The interactive
processing system should also offer different display modes for visualisation, e.g. depth plot,
error plot, single profile, single beam, backscatter imagery etc. and should allow for the
visualisation of the survey data in conjunction with other useful information as e.g. shoreline,
wrecks, aids to navigation etc; editing of data should be possible in all modes and include an audit
trail. If feasible, data displays should be geo-referenced. The flags set during the automatic stage,
which correspond to depths shallower than the surrounding area, should require explicit operator
action, at least, for Special Order and Order 1 surveys. If the operator overrules flags set during
the automatic stage, this should be documented. If a flag is set by the operator, the type of flag
used should indicate this.
2.7 Data Quality - Presentation
2.7.1 Chart Reliability Diagrams
Traditionally, the quality of bathymetric data has been a subjective procedure. For a user, the quality of
the data which is presented is assessed through the chart reliability diagram. This diagram is displayed as
an inset on a chart and indicates the areas surveyed together with some detail, e.g. scale, line spacing, year
12
Patrick McGlamery, “Issues of Authenticity of Spatial data”, University of Connecticut USA, 66th IFLA Council and
General Conference, http://magic.lib.uconn.edu.
13
International Hydrographic Organisation, Monaco, IHO Standards for Hydrographic Surveys (S-44), P-12, fourth edition
1998.
14
IHO, Monaco, Circular Letter 45/200, “Guidelines for the Procesing of High Volume Bathymetric Data”, Para-3.3, dated 5
Oct 01.
M-13
17
of survey. Unfortunately, the very nature of the information displayed on a reliability diagram, the ability
to qualify data quality is severely limited. For instance, if the chart user is unaware what a pre 1970 sonar
swept area means or what might be inferred from a line spacing of “n” metres, then the reliability diagram
is of little real use in determining the quality of the depth data shown.
The original concept of the reliability diagram was to classify the quality of survey data and depict the
different classifications on a diagram in terms of good, fair or poor quality. The diagram was intended to
provide the mariner with the capacity to assess the danger of deviating from the recommended track.
However, there has been growing concern over the complexity of the reliability diagram and the
increasing difficulty of maintaining it in a form which is simple for the chart user. If they are too
complicated; reliability diagrams become difficult to construct as a cartographic activity, prone to error in
construction, and its use would be ignored by the mariners.
Reliability diagrams fall well short of achieving the fundamental aim of providing an indication of data
quality to the mariner and in a very simple form. Furthermore, given the precise navigation capability
which ENC and the ECDIS can facilitate, users require a far more definitive assessment of data quality to
be available so that they can use the available information prudently. Thus, an alternative to the existing
reliability diagram is required as the final quality indicator.
Source diagrams and similar variants shown on charts are all considered to present similar shortcomings.
2.7.2 Zones of Confidence (ZOC)
The ZOC concept was developed by the IHO to provide a mean of classifying bathymetric data. ZOC
provide a simple and logical mean of displaying to the mariner the confidence that the national charting
authority places on any particular selection of bathymetric data. It seeks to classify areas for navigation
by identifying the various levels of confidence that can be placed in the underlying data using a
combination of the following criteria:
* Depth and position accuracy,

* Thoroughness of seafloor search, and
* Conformance to an approved quality plan.
Under this concept six ZOCs were developed and subsequently approved for inclusion as a part of IHO S-
57. ZOCs A1, A2, and B are generated from modern and future surveys with, critically, ZOCs A1 and A2
requiring a full area search. ZOCs C and D reflect low accuracy and poor quality data whilst ZOC U
represents data which is un-assessed at the time of publication. ZOCs are designed to be depicted on
paper charts, as an insert diagram in place of the current reliability diagram, and on electronic displays.
It must be emphasized that ZOCs are a charting standard and are not intended to be used for specifying
standards for hydrographic surveys or for the management of data quality. The depth and position
accuracy specified for each ZOC refer to the errors of the final depicted soundings and include not only
survey errors but also any other errors introduced in the chart production process. The following
paragraphs summaries individual ZOC specifications:
2.7.2.1 ZOC A1 – Position and depth data gathered in accordance with procedures and accuracies
specified. Surveys conducted using recognized technology with a full area search undertaken with the
aim of ensuring that all significant features are detected and depths measured. Typically, the survey
would have been undertaken on WGS 84, using DGPS or a minimum three lines of position with
multibeam, channel or mechanical sweep system. Due to the intensity of data gathering and the
considerable time required to achieve this standard it can be expected that data with a ZOC A1 rating will
M-13
18
most likely indicate critical channels, berthing areas, areas with minimum under keel clearances,
navigation channels, recommended tracks, harbours and harbour approaches.
2.7.2.2 ZOC A2 – Position and depth data gathered in accordance with procedures and accuracies
specified. Survey conducted using recognized technology with a full area search undertaken with the aim
of ensuring that all significant features are detected and depths measured. Typically, the survey would
have been conducted using a modern survey echosounder with sonar or mechanical sweep. Although
position and depth accuracies not as high as ZOC A1, seafloor coverage is such that the mariner should
have a high level of confidence in the quality of data.
2.7.2.3 ZOC B – Position and depth data gathered in accordance with procedures and accuracies
specified. However, a full area search has not been achieved and uncharted features, hazardous to surface
navigation, although not expected, may exist. This ZOC indicates to the mariner a reasonable level of
confidence in the quality of data. ZOC B has the same position and depth accuracies as those required for
ZOC A2 and would apply to (e.g.) modern surveys which have not achieved a full seafloor search and
feature detection. The prudent mariner would require more under keel clearance in this ZOC than in ZOC
A1 or A2.
2.7.2.4 ZOC C – Position and depth accuracy less than that achieved for ZOC B as described. Depth
data may originate from sources other than a controlled, systematic hydrographic survey (e.g. passage
sounding). A full area search has not been achieved and depth anomalies may be expected. ZOC C
indicates that the mariner should navigate with special care and allow, with due regard to the depth of
water in which they are navigating, greater safety margins to the charted information.
2.7.2.5 ZOC D – Position and depth data is of a very low quality or cannot be assessed due to a lack of
supporting information. A full area search has not been achieved and large depth anomalies may be
expected.
M-13
19
2.7.2.6 ZOC U – The quality of bathymetric data has yet to be assessed.
TABLE 1.2
Category of Zones of Confidence in Data – ZOC Table
1 2 3 4 5
ZOC1 Position2 Depth Accuracy3 Seafloor4 Typical Survey5
Accuracy Coverage Characteristics
A1 ± 5m = 0.50 + 1%d Full area search Controlled, systematic
Depth(m) Accuracy undertaken. All survey6 high position and
(m) significant seafloor depth accuracy, achieved
10 ± 0.6 features4 detected using DGPS or a minimum
30 ± 0.8 have had depths of three high quality lines
100 ± 1.5 measured. of position (LOP) and a
1000 ± 10.5 multibeam, channel or
mechanical sweep system.
ZOC1 Position2 Depth Accuracy3 Seafloor4 Typical Survey5
Accuracy Coverage Characteristics
A2 ± 20m = 1.00 + 2%d Full area search Controlled, systematic
Depth(m) Accuracy undertaken. All survey6 high position and
(m) significant seafloor depth accuracy less than
10 ± 1.2 features4 detected ZOC A1, and using a
30 ± 1.6 have had depths modern survey
100 ± 3.0 measured. eachosounder7 and a sonar
1000 ± 21.0 or mechanical sweep
system.
B ± 50m = 1.00 + 2%d Full area search not Controlled, systematic
Depth(m) Accuracy achieved; survey6 achieving similar
(m) uncharted features, depth but lesser position
10 ± 1.2 hazardous to accuracies than ZOC A2,
30 ± 1.6 surface navigation, using a modern survey
100 ± 3.0 are not expected, eachosounder7 but no
1000 ± 21.0 but may exist. sonar or mechanical sweep
system.
C ± 500m = 2.00 + 5%d Full AREA Low accuracy survey or
Depth(m) Accuracy SEARCH NOT data collected on an
(m) ACHIEVED; depth opportunity basis such as
10 ± 2.5 anomalies may be soundings on passage.
30 ± 3.5 expected.
100 ± 7.0
1000 ± 52.0
D Worse than Worse Poor quality or data that

ZOC C Than cannot be assessed due to
ZOC C lack of information.
U Un-assessed
M-13
20
Notes:
To decide on a ZOC category, all conditions outlined in Columns 2 to 4 of the Table must be met,
Explanatory note numbers quoted in the table have the following meanings:
1. The allocation of a ZOC indicates that particular data meets minimum criteria for position
and depth accuracy and seafloor coverage defined in the Table. ZOC categories reflect a
charting standard and not just a hydrographic survey standard. Depth and position
accuracies specified for each ZOC category refer to the errors of the final depicted soundings
and include not only hydrographic survey errors but also other errors introduced in the chart
production process. Data may be further qualified by Object Class “Quality of Data”
(M_QUAL) sub-attributes as follows:
* Positional Accuracy (POSACC) and Sounding Accuracy (SOUACC) may be used to

indicate that a higher position or depth accuracy has been achieved than defined in this
Table (e.g. a survey where full seafloor coverage was not achieved could not be classified
higher that ZOC B; however, if the position accuracy was, for instance ± 15 metres, the
sub-attribute POSACC could be used to indicate this).
* Swept areas where the clearance depth is accurately known but the actual seabed depth
is not accurately known may be accorded a “higher” ZOC (i.e. A1 or A2) providing
position and depth accuracies of the swept depth meets the criteria in this Table. In this
instance, Depth Range Value 1 (DRVAL1) may be used to specify the swept depth. The
position accuracy criteria apply to the boundaries of swept areas.
* SURSTA, SUREND and TECSOU may be used to indicate the start and end dates of the
survey and the technique of sounding measurement.
2. Position accuracy criteria at 95% CI (2.45 sigma) with respect to the given datum. It is the
cumulative error and includes survey, transformation and digitizing errors etc. Position
accuracy need not be rigorously computed for ZOCs B, C and D but may be estimated based
on type of equipment, calibration regime, historical accuracy etc.
3. Depth accuracy of depicted soundings for (e.g.) ZOC A1 = 0.50 metres + 1% d at 95% CI
(2.00 sigma) where d = depth in metres at the critical depth. Depth accuracy need not be
rigorously computed for ZOCs B, C and D but may be estimated based on type of equipment,
calibration regime, historical accuracy etc.
4. Significant seafloor features are defined as those rising above depicted depths by more than:
Note: Mariners should have due regard to limitations of sounding equipment when assessing
margins of safety to be applied.
Depth Significant Feature

< 10 metres > 0.1 x depth
10 to 30 metres > 1.0 metre
> 30 metres > (0.1 x depth minus 2.0 metres
5. Typical Survey Characteristics – These descriptions should be seen as indicative examples

only.
M-13
21
6. Controlled, systematic surveys (ZOCs A1, A2 and B) – surveys comprising planned survey
lines, on a geodetic datum that can be transformed to WGS 84.
7. Modern survey echosounder – a high precision single beam depth measuring equipment,
generally including all survey echosounders designed post 1970.
2.8 Data Production

The final data production can both be in digital and analog form. Schematic diagram is given below.
Data Production
Paper Digital
Smooth Sheet Field Records Spatial Data& Meta Data

Attributes
Data Format
Fig. 1.2 "Digital Production schematic diagram"
Digital data should be in defined format to be directly imported into main database. As each survey
typically includes numerous supporting documents and digital data files, deliverables must clearly be
labelled in a manner that is both descriptive and intuitive to hydrographic office personnel. Ideally,
standard operating procedures agreed by IHO and field units which covers such documents and digital
data files, are enforced. Manual data should be clear, concise and in legible form which is properly
15
labelled and marked .
After the data is collected, processed and plotted in the form of smooth sheets (manuscript in digital
form), the inventory of the final deliverables is forwarded to Hydrographic office, the inventory of which
16
should generally include :
15
http://www.hydro.navy.gov.au/news/htf/htf.pdf.
16
Lieutenant Eric J. Sipos and Physical Scientist Castle Parker, “NOAA AHB Quality Assurance Inspections for Contract
Hydrographic Surveys”, NOAA Hydrographic Survey Division, USA
M-13
22
• Smooth Sheets.
• Digital files of smooth sheet with attributes.
• Raw and processed bathymetric data.
• Tide, sound velocity and vessel configuration files.
• Side scan data files.
• Descriptive report and supplemental reports.
• Field logs and documentation of processing.
• Calibration documentation.
2.9 Nautical Information System (NIS)
Nautical Information system is the combination of skilled persons, spatial and descriptive data, analytic
methods and computer software and hardware - all organized to automate, manage and deliver
information through presentation i.e. paper and digital charts. Previously, the main use of nautical chart
databases was in the production of paper charts. Advances in navigation technology have set new
demands on accuracy, reliability and the format of nautical charts. The positional accuracy of the chart
should meet the increased accuracy of the positioning systems. To fully benefit from the dynamics of the
modern positioning methods, the need of digital chart has arisen in parallel to the traditional printed
charts. An international standard for digital hydrographic data has been developed by the International
Hydrographic Organization (IHO). The valid version of the standard, S-57 edition 3.1 was adopted as the
official IHO standard in November 2000 and is also specified in the International Maritime Organization
(IMO) Performance Standards for Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS). S-57
describes the standard to be used for the exchange of digital hydrographic data between national
Hydrographic Offices and for the distribution of digital data and products to manufacturers, mariners, and
other data users. The most significant digital product being delivered in the S-57 format is the electronic
navigational chart (ENC). The rapidly increased need for electronic navigational charts (ENC) has led to a
situation for many hydrographic offices where there are two separate production lines for the two
products, ENC cells and paper charts. It is essential for the safety of navigation that the products are not
17
in conflict with one another. A typical NIS has four main functional subsystems (Fig 1.3).
• Data Input. The data input subsystem allows the user to capture, collect, and transform
spatial and thematic data into digital form. The data inputs are usually derived from a
combination of hard copy maps, aerial photographs, remotely sensed images, reports, survey
documents, etc.
• Data Base - Storage and Retrieval. Data storage and retrieval subsystem organizes the
data, spatial and attribute, in a form which permits it to be quickly retrieved by the user for
analysis, and permits rapid and accurate updates to be made to the database.
• Data Base - Manipulation and Analysis. The data manipulation and analysis subsystem
allows the user to define and execute spatial and attribute procedures to generate derived
information. This subsystem is commonly thought of as the heart of a GIS, and usually
distinguishes it from other database information systems and computer-aided drafting (CAD)
systems.
• Data Output. The data output subsystem allows the user to generate graphic displays,
normally maps, and tabular reports representing derived information products.
17
Dan Sherrill and Asa Carlsson, “The JANUS Solution for Hydrographic Information”, T-Kartor AB Sweden- Box 5097 - S-
291 05 Kristianstad – Sweden, ds@t-kartor.se & ac@t-kartor.se
M-13
23
INPUT
Maps
Processing Quality
Conversion
Images & Editing Control
Module
Module
Digital Data
DATABASE
Management
Analysis
OUTPUT
ENC files Paper charts NTMs Queries
in S-57 at various & Other &
format scales publications reports
Fig. 1.3 "NIS Functional Subsystems"
There are four components of NIS; data, hardware, software, and users18. As shown in the Fig 1.4, the
components must be integrated; they must be linked together and work in concert to support the
management and analysis of spatial or mapped data.
Hardware Software
Data Base
Data Users
Fig. 1.4 "NIS Components"
18
Lloyd P. Queen and Charles R. Blinn, “The Basics of geographic Information Systems”,
lqueen@mercurry.forestry.umn.edu and cblinnlqueen@mercurry.forestry.umn.edu
M-13
24
• Data. All data in a database are either spatial data or attribute data. Spatial data tells us where
something occurs. Attribute data tells what occurs; it tells us the nature or characteristics of the
spatial data.
• Hardware. Computer hardware must be able to support data input, output, storage, retrieval,
display, and analysis.
• Software. Software used should be dynamic and have wide variety of functional capabilities.
• Users. The term "user" may refer to any individual who will use NIS to support project or
program goals, or to an entire organization that will employ.
2.9.1 Compilation Process
Data compilation involves assembling all of the spatial and attribute data in NIS. Map data with common
projections, scales, and coordinate systems must be pooled together in order to establish the centralized
NIS database. Data must also be examined for compatibility in terms of content and time of data
collection. Ultimately, the data will be stored in NIS according to the specific format requirements set by
both the user and the chosen NIS software/hardware environment.
When all of the common data requirements are set by the user, a "base map" has been established. A base
map is a set of standard requirements for data. It provides accurate standards for geographic control, and
also defines a model or template that is used to shape all data into a compatible form. A base map is not
necessarily a map rather, it is a comprehensive set of standards established and enacted to ensure quality
control for the spatial and attribute data contained in the NIS.
Once the data are assembled and base map parameters are set the user must translate manuscript data into
computer-compatible form. This process referred to as "conversion" or "digitizing," converts paper maps
into numerical digits that can be stored in the computer. Digitizing can be performed using various
techniques. Scanning is one technique. Another technique is line digitizing which uses a tablet and a
tracing stylus. Digitizing simplifies map data into sets of points, lines, or cells that can be stored in the
NIS computer. Each NIS software package will impose a specific form and design on the way that these
sets of points, lines, and cells are stored as digital map files.
Following figure shows the various types of compilation processes.
Chart Compilation
Manual Quasi- Computer Assisted
Fig. 1.5 "Chart Compilation Processes"
M-13
25
2.9.1.1 Manual: Traditional cartographic work, is based on colour separation and manual processes. The
fair drawing is a manual method of preparing linework, symbols and topology (names) in accordance with
the chart specifications. High quality linework is achieved by a process called “scribing” where the image
is engraved on a coated film ensuring that cartographic specifications are carefully adhered to. Each
colour used on a map is scribed on a separate film colour plate and symbols and names are combined
photo-mechanically to produce colour separates for printing. Traditional cartography, defined as the
manual techniques used for the production of a paper chart (before the advent of the computer), can be
split in six components19:
• Compilation Work. The selection of the information collected for the production of the new
edition of the paper chart.
• Image generation. The process of assigning symbol type, shape and structure to features on a
map.
• Image registration. The technique to ensure that individual colour components fit each other in
the map.
• Contact copying at scale. The operation used to produce same-size line, half-tone and
continuous-tone positives and negatives by a direct contact process.
• Image separation/combination. The techniques used to produce multicolour maps by the

sequential overprinting of a number of separate colour components.
• Printing. The charts are printed using offset lithographic process.
Quasi – automatic: Quasi-automatic cartography is the combination of manual and computer assisted
techniques used for the production of a paper chart. Although, it contains the steps involved in manual but
some of them are done by automatic means e.g. contouring is done by drafting machines instead of hands.
2.9.1.2 Computer Assisted Cartography: To improve services and to meet the growing demands for
chart, computer assisted mapping systems are also used. The introduction of computer assisted mapping
and geographic information systems have added new dimensions to cartographic techniques and usage of
spatial data. The computer assisted cartographic steps are generally divided into the following six steps20:
• Acquisition and Input. Digital data is usually obtained from various sources e.g. digital files or
scanning of old charts.
• Verification. All incoming data is verified for various and checked for formats, scale and feature
coding etc.
• Editing and attributing. Main tasks involve ensuring features are topologically correct,
attributed and symbolized according to Cartographic Digital Standards (CDS). Original
manuscripts that were scanned require geo-referencing, and interactive editing and feature
coding. All text or annotation on the map is added interactively.
19
Lt Cdr Luis Pais, “Production and Distribution of ENC – The Portuguese Experience”, Potugal (IHPT),
hidrografia@hidrografico.pt, www.thsoa.org/pdf/h01/7_3.pdf.
20
Vic Dohar and Dave Everett, “Geological Map Production for Dummies”, Natural Resources Ottawa, Canada,
vdohar@nrcan.gc.ca,http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/of00-325/dohar.html.
M-13
26
• Quality Control. A filtering process is used to create a report document that checks the project
for completeness and correct feature attribution. Quality control officers ensure that the chart
meets design specifications and that the digital data conforms to CDS. All maps are reviewed by
the cartographers prior to publication.
• Printing. A final file is created for printing. Modern offset printing process may be single colour
machines or may print multi colours in sequence.
2.9.2 Presentation
The real world is far too complex for a complete description to be practical, therefore a simplified, highly-
specific, view of real world must be used. This is achieved by modelling the reality. The presentation of
hydrographic information may vary to suit a particular use (e.g. it may be presented either graphically,
using symbols or in a textual form). Therefore, the presentation of information should be independent of
its storage. The concept of keeping information storage independent of presentation provides greater
versatility and flexibility. It allows the same data to be used for many purposes without requiring any
change to its structure or content. If the presentation style or medium changes, only the presentation
model has to be changed. Therefore, the model described can be linked to many different presentation
models. For example, ENC and paper charts present the same basic data in different ways via different
presentation models21.
2.9.2.1 Paper Charts. A Nautical Chart is a graphic portrayal that shows the nature and form of the
coast, the depths of the water and general character and configuration of the sea bottom, locations of
dangers to navigation, the rise and fall of the tides, locations of man-made aids to navigation, and the
characteristics of the Earth's magnetism22. In addition to its basic elements, a chart is a working document
used by the mariner both as a "road map" and worksheet and is essential for safe navigation. In
conjunction with supplemental navigational aids, it is used to lay out courses and navigate ships by the
shortest and most economical safe route.
Printed charts present all important information such as chart features with appropriate symbology and
descriptive cartographic information texts and symbols. The volume of information is limited due to the
size of the chart as well as the readability aspects of it. One of the most important aspects of the
preparation work of the data to be published on the printed chart is cartographic generalization and
cartographic editing of the data. These include e.g. displacement, aggregation, selection, rotation and text
width, font and placement.
2.9.2.2 Digital Charts. Digital charts means a standardized database, as to content, structure and format,
as shown in Fig 1.6.
21
International Hydrographic Organisation, Monaco, Specifications for Chart Content and Display Aspects of ECDIS (S-52).
22
http://chartmaker.ncd.noaa.gov/ncd/whatis.html.
M-13
27
Digital Chart
Vector Chart Raster Chart Hybrid Chart
ENC DNC HCRF BSB
Fig. 1.6 "Digital Chart Types and Formats"
23
Digital charts are a new navigation aid that can provide significant benefits to maritime navigation,
safety, and commerce. More than simply a computer graphics display, digital chart systems combine both
geographic and textual data into a readily useful operational tool. As an automated decision aid capable of
continuously determining a vessel's position in relation to land, charted objects, aids to navigation, and
unseen hazards, ENC are a real-time navigation system that integrates a variety of information that is
displayed and interpreted by the Mariner. The most advanced form of digital chart systems represents an
entirely new approach to maritime navigation.
2.9.2.3 Vector Charts
ENC: An Electronic Navigational Chart (ENC) is vector data conforming to IHO S-57 ENC product
specification in terms of contents, structure and format. Issued for use with ECDIS on the authority of
government authorized hydrographic offices, an ENC contains all the chart information necessary for safe
navigation and may contain supplementary information in addition to that contained in the paper chart
(e.g., sailing directions). In general, an S-57 ENC is an object-oriented, structurally layered data set
designed for a range of hydrographic applications. As defined in IHO S-57 Edition 3, the data is
comprised of a series of points, lines, features, and objects. The minimum size of a data is a “cell” which
is a spherical rectangle (i.e. bordered by meridians and latitude circles). Adjacent cells do not overlap.
The scale of the data contained in the cell is dependent upon the navigational purpose (e.g. general,
coastal, approach, harbour). Other than a 5 Mb size limit to the amount of digital data contained in an
ENC cell, there are no specifications regarding the dimensions of a cell as the smallest packaging.
DNC: The Digital Nautical Chart (DNCTM) is a vector database of selected maritime features that can be
used with shipboard integrated navigation systems (e.g. electronic chart systems), or other types of
geographic information systems (GIS). Similar to IHO S-57 ENCs, the DNC database consists of points,
lines and polygons that contain information regarding hydrography, aid-to-navigation, cultural land
marks, land features, depths, obstructions, etc. Each theme (e.g. hydrography) is stored as thematic layer
with geo-referenced properties. The DNC product is encapsulated using the Digest Annex C Vector
23
Lee Alexander, Ph.D., “What is an ENC? It depends who you ask”, Offshore Systems Ltd., Vancouver, BC, Canada,
http://www.osl.com/Support/what_is_enc.htm.
M-13
28
Relational Form (VRF) of encoding which consists of a set of relational database tables. Further the data
is organised into series of “libraries” which are groupings of chart coverage which are commensurate with
NIMA’s groupings of paper nautical charts scales (e.g. General, Coastal, Approach, and Harbour). In the
ECDIS concept a DNC is a “system” electronic navigational chart (SENC) that contains specified data
and display characteristics.
2.9.2.4 Raster Charts
Raster data formats are bitmaps with a geo-reference applied to them. A bitmap is a generic term for a
computer image made up of a rectangular grid of very small (254 per inch is one standard) coloured
squares or pixels. These bitmaps are usually generated by taking the original chart and scanning them to
create a digital picture of the chart. Once this image has been acquired, a geo-reference is applied. This is
the process of relating the grid positions of the bitmap pixels to their corresponding latitude and
longitudes. In this way, a computer can relate pixel position to latitude and longitude. However, the
system has no knowledge of the details of the features and details (such as the coast line) in the raster
images it displays. Raster charts are produced by scanning at high resolution the original colour separates,
which are used to print the paper charts. The digital files are carefully georeferenced to enable navigation
software to map geographic positions to locations in the image. Metadata is added describing the chart, its
datum, projection and other information about the chart and the digital file.
Hydrographic Chart Raster Format. (HCRF): This is the format developed by UKHO and used for its
Admiralty Raster Chart Service (ARCS) and the Australian HO for its Seafarer Chart Service. Raster
charts have the same standards of accuracy and reliability as paper charts. These are used with authorised
compatible Electronic Charting Systems (ECS).
BSB Format: The (BSB) format is basically one or more raster images compressed in to an efficient
package that is accompanied by the chart details within the package. These chart details include the geo
referencing required for determining latitude and longitude as well as other particulars such as, scale,
depth units, chart name, etc. The BSB format separates a chart into images depending on the number of
compartments a chart contains where a 'compartment' is defined as main chart, chart inset, and chart
continuation
2.9.2.5 Hybrid Charts
Ideally the master versions of all discrete digital cartographic product data would be held in vector form.
The rise in capacity of computer systems over recent years has opened up the alternative of transferring
quickly to digital methods by raster scanning the existing printing separates, and then using hybrid
raster/vector techniques during a changeover period. Raster masters are replaced by vector masters in a
sequence determined by costs and business priorities.
M-13
29
ANNEX A
ACRONYMS
ARCS Admiralty Raster Chart Service

AHO Australian Hydrographic Office
CAD Computer aided drafting
CD Compact Disk
CDS Cartographic Digital Standards
DNC Digital Nautical Chart
ECS Electronic Charting System
ENC Electronic Navigation Chart
ECDIS Electronic Chart Display and Information System
GIS Geographic Information System
HCRF Hydrographic Chart Raster Format
HTF Hydrographic Transfer Format
HI Project Instruction/Hydrographic Instruction
IHO International Hydrographic Organisation
IMO International Maritime Organisation
NHO National Hydrographic Office
NIMA National Imagery and Mapping Agency
NIS Nautical Information System
NTM Notices to Mariners
QC Quality Control
RNC Raster Nautical Chart
SENC System Electronic Navigational Chart
UKHO United Kingdom Hydrographic Office
VRF Vector Relational Form
WGS World Geodetic System
M-13
30
REFERENCES
D. Russom & H. R. “Some Basic Principles in the International Hydrographic Review,

W. Halliwell Compilation of Nautical Charts” Vol. LV No. 2, July 1978
William G. Swisher “National Ocean Survey Automated International Hydrographic Review,
Information System” Vol. LVIII No. 2, July 1981
N. M. Anderson “Computer Assisted Cartography in the International Hydrographic Review,
Canadian Hydrographic Service” Vol. LVIII No. 2, July 1981
Christer Palm “From Manuscript to Printed Chart” International Hydrographic Review,
Vol. LX No. 2, July 1982
Martin Joseph “Assessing the Precision of Depth Data” International Hydrographic Review,
Vol. LXVIII No. 2, July 1991
E. C. Bouwmeester “Optimal Line Spacing in Hydrographic International Hydrographic Review,

and A. W. Heemink Survey” Vol. LXX No. 1, March 1993
H. Gorziglia “Computer Assisted Cartography at International Hydrographic Review,
Hydrographic and Oceanographic Vol. LXX No, September 1993
Service of Chilean Navy”
Adam J. Kerr “Conceptual Model of a Regionally International Hydrographic Review,
Integrated Data Base For ECDIS” Vol. LXXI No. 2, September 1994
Udo Laube “The Hydrographic and Wrecksearch International Hydrographic Review,
Vessel “DENEB” as an Example for a Vol. LXXII No. 2, March 1995
Modern Survey Vessel”
B. Bourgeois, F. “A GIS Integration Approach for The Hydrographic Journal, January
Petry, M. Harris & Dynamically Reconfigurable Surveys” 1999.
P. Alleman
Patrick McGlamery “Issues of Authenticity of Spatial Data” 66th IFLA Council and General
Conference 2000.
Neal G. Millet and “Hydrographic Management using GIS U.S. Hydrographic Conference
Simon Evans Technologies” 2001.
Lieutenant Eric J. “NOAA AHB Assurance Inspections for U.S. Hydrographic Conference
Sipos Contract Hydrographic Surveys” 2001.
Lt Cdr Luis Pais “Production and Distribution of ENC – U.S. Hydrographic Conference
The Portuguese experience” 2001.
M-13
31
URL ADDRESSES
1. Ames Remote http://www.amesremote.com
2. Caris Marine http://www.caris.com
3. Coastal Oceanographic, Inc http://www.coastalo.comNational
4. ESRI Software http://www.esri.com/library/
5. Federal Geographic Data Committee http://fgdc.er.usgs.gov/fgdc.html
6. Hydrographic Society of America http://www.thsoa.org
7. Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) http://www.nima.mil
8. International Hydrographic Organisation http://www.iho.shom.fr/iho.html
9. JANUS Technologies http://www.janus-tech.com
10. NOAA National Coast Survey http://chartmaker.ncd.noaa.gov
11. Offshore Systems Ltd. http://www.osl.com/corporate
12. Primar Organisation http://www.primar.org
12. SeaBeam Instruments http://www.seabeam.com/
13. Reson, Inc http://www.reson.com
14. The Laser-scan Ltd., http://www.Laser-Scan.com/papers
15. The GIS Primer http://www.innovativesgis.com
M-13
32
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Admiralty “Manual of Hydrography” Vol I & Vol II

Bowditch “American Practical Navigator” U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office.
Admiralty “General Instructions for Hydrographic
Surveyors”
Karl B. Jeffers “Hydrographic Manual” U.S. Department of Commerce
IHO Special “IHO Standards for Hydrographic
Publication S-44 Surveys”
IHO Special “Spécifications for Chart Content and
Publication S-52 Display Aspects of ECDIS”
IHO Special “IHO Transfer Standards for Digital
Publication S-57 Hydrographic Data”
IHO Special “Product Specification for Raster

Publication S-61 Navigational Charts (RNC)”
IHO Circular Letter “Guidelines for the Processing of High Dated 5 Oct 2001.
45/2001 Volume Bathymetric Data”
“Map Compilation Color Separation and Headquarters Department of Army,
revision” Washington.
Colonnel Sir Charles “Text Book of Topographical and Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Close & Colonel H. Geographical Surveying”
St. J. L.
Winterbotham
__________
M-13
33
CHAPTER 2
POSITIONING
1. INTRODUCTION
Determination of position with relative reliability is the fundamental problem facing the reference frame
of a Geographic Information System (GIS) and the principal purpose of the science of geodesy.
Determination of position for points on the earth’s surface requires the establishment of appropriate co-
ordinates in the selected geodetic reference system (DATUM).
The minimum information output, when the tool ‘co-ordinates’ is selected by the user, should be:
• The parameters that fully describe the reference system;

• The required co-ordinate details for the selected cartographic symbol or point.
In this way it is possible to unambiguously define the co-ordinates of a point or object with reference to
the real world.
2. PRINCIPLES OF POSITIONING
2.1 The Earth
Calculation of position with repeatable accuracy is the central problem for the geographical reference of
terrestrial information and the principal function of geodesy.
The geographical position of a point on the earth’s surface can be defined in relation to a mathematically
defined reference surface which is used in place of the true surface of the Earth (very close to an ellipsoid
of rotation or bi-axial).
Reference surfaces should have two fundamental characteristics:
• mathematically defined;
• closely fitting the true surface in the desired location.
Reference surfaces used for limited areas are very often:
• the ellipsoid of rotation (or bi-axial);

• the local spheroid;
• the horizontal plane (or tangent plane);
• the geoid.
The first three have purely arithmetical definitions and they are used for horizontal positioning; the fourth
surface has a physical definition and has a relationship with the others for height/separation value. A
three-dimensional position is defined by 2 horizontal co-ordinates and a vertical component which is the
height above the reference surface.
M-13
34
Fig. 2.1 "The Earth"
2.1.1 The Ellipsoid
The ellipsoid is a fourth order surface on which all curves of intersection with a plane are ellipses, which
eventually degenerate into circles. For any selected point on the ellipsoid surface and for the normal to
the tangent plan at this point, the ellipses produced by the intersection with such a surface and the normal
form endless continuing planes, they are known as normal sections and have, at that point, a number of
varying bending radii. This variation is a continuous function of the ellipsoid latitude of the selected
point, of the ellipsoid shape parameters and the azimuth of the produced normal section. The two normal
sections, which correspond to the minimum and maximum curving radii, are defined as the principal
normal sections.
For geodetic purposes the ellipsoid of revolution, produced when an ellipse is rotated about its semi-
minor axis, provides a well defined mathematical surface whose shape and size are defined by two
parameters: lengths of semi-minor axis (b) and semi-major axis (a). The shape of a reference ellipsoid
can also be described by either its flattening: f = [(a - b) / a] or its eccentricity: e = [( a2 - b2 )1/2 / a].
M-13
35
Fig. 2.2 "The Ellipsoid"
The ellipsoid surface is regular and derived mathematically; it is for these reasons that, as a reference
surface, it is the widely used for horizontal co-ordinate systems. However it is of limited use as a
reference for heighting as it is such a coarse approximation of the earth’s shape.
2.1.2 The local Sphere
A local sphere is a reference surface which, at a selected latitude, has a radius equal to the geometric
mean between the curving radii of the two principal normal sections of the ellipsoid being replaced at the
point of interest on the surface.
Substitution is acceptable within a radius of approximately 100 km (in Geodetic Field) from the point of
tangency between ellipsoid and sphere, it involves shifts in distances and angles of less than the
sensitivity of the best survey tools (distances: 1cm +/- 1ppm; angles: 0.1'').
Within a radius of 15 km (in Topographic Field) from the same point, it is acceptable to replace the
sphere with a tangent plan, causing a shift in comparison with the ellipsoid surface less than the above
stated accuracies.
M-13
36
2.1.3 The Geoid
The Geoid, defined as the equipotential surface of gravity strength field, is used as a reference surface for
heights; Mean Sea Level (MSL) is the best approximation of such a surface. The physical meaning of
gravity equipotential surfaces may easily be checked, as every point should be orthogonal to the direction
indicated by a plumb line.
Unlike the ellipsoid, the Geoid can not be mathematically created or utilized in calculations because its
shape depends on the irregular distribution of the mass inside the Earth.
2.2 Datum
A Datum is a Geodetic Reference System defined by the reference surface precisely positioned and held
in the space; it is generated by a compensated net of points.
The SP-32 (IHO – Fifth Edition 1994) defines a geodetic Datum as “a set of parameters specifying the
reference surface or the reference co-ordinate system used for geodetic control in the calculation of co-
ordinates for points on the Earth; commonly datums are defined separately as horizontal and vertical”.
The determination of a unique reference surface for the whole Earth, essential for the use of satellite
systems and associated survey and positioning techniques, has in the past been of little interest and
difficult to achieve, due to the essentially local character of geodetic and topographic survey techniques.
For this reason, there are many local geodetic systems worldwide, all defined with the sole purpose of
obtaining a good approximation only for the area of interest.
Furthermore, for each nation it is normal to find two reference surfaces defined in different ways, because
there has been a clear separation between the determination of positions for the horizontal and the
vertical:
a. Local Ellipsoid;
b. Local Geoid.
Fig. 2.3 "Datum orientation"
M-13
37
2.2.1 Horizontal Datum
Horizontal Datum is a mathematical model of the Earth which is used for calculating the geographical co-
ordinates of points. A reference bi-axial ellipsoid in association with a local system is a horizontal
geodetic reference system (that is bi-dimensional). It is defined from a set of 8 parameters: 2 for shape
of the ellipsoid and 6 for position and orientation. Such a reference system is not geocentric, that is the
ellipsoid centre is shifted from Earth’s centre of mass by a quantity of about 100 metres; additionally the
ellipsoid axes symmetry is not aligned to the mean terrestrial rotational axes, although angular shifts are
very small, an order similar in quantity for the accuracy of the more sophisticated angular measurement
capabilities.
The local ellipsoid must be positioned and orientated with regard to the Earth to enable translation from
the measured geometric quantity (distances, angles, difference in elevations) to the calculation for the
relative position associated with a point of known ellipsoid co-ordinates, conventionally selected in
relation to local requirements. With satellite technology developments, it is now possible to directly
obtain co-ordinates in comparison with a geocentric system which require no modification by the user and
can be used internationally. In the past, when geocentric positioning was not possible, the only way for
positioning and to directly reference systems was to establish an initial point (point of origin) and a
connection with the local astronomic system (defined by the local vertical and by the terrestrial axis of
rotation).
There are two parameters for shape which identify an ellipsoid, the other six (6 degrees of freedom of a
rigid body in the space) which must be determined in the initial point, are:
a. ellipsoid or geodetic latitude;

b. ellipsoid or geodetic longitude;
c. geoid elevation (or orthometric height);
d. two components for the vertical deviation;
e. ellipsoid azimuth for a direction that has the origin as its point.
The policy continues that to connect the two fundamental surfaces, ellipsoid and geoid, selecting the point
of origin for a known geodetic height, has to have an astronomically determined latitude and longitude.
You therefore force the ellipsoid co-ordinates of the point of origin to coincide with the astronomical or
celestial co-ordinates.
This condition produces two fundamental effects:
a. It binds a preset point on the ellipsoid to a direction in the space (eliminating two degrees of
freedom);
b. It makes sure that the point is coincidence with the ellipsoid normal axis and with the geoid
vertical axis (a further two fixed degrees of freedom removed).
Ascribing the point of origin ellipsoid height to be coincident with known geodetic height and aligning
the ellipsoid rotational axis in the direction of the astronomical North, it is possible to fix the remaining
two degrees of freedom of the ellipsoid relative to the geoid:
a. Sliding along the normal/vertical;

b. Rotating around to it.
On completion of these operations, the local ellipsoid of reference is focussed on the point of origin.
M-13
38
Fig. 2.4 "Horizontal Datum orientation"
2.2.2 Type of datum
Local geodetic systems employed in geodesy and cartography before the advent of satellite systems were
based, as previously stated, on ellipsoids which approximately fitted the local geoid surface.
In this way, in operational applications, adjustments between the vertical and ellipsoidal normal are
reduced and almost negligible, angular measurements on the ground can be quoted for ellipsoidal figures
without corrections. This situation can be considered valid in cases for smaller nations with a limited
surface area; it can also be acceptable, but with a degraded approximation, for wider zones, such as the
whole of Europe or the United States.
The demand for wider reference systems has grown during recent decades in concomitance with the
general globalization process.
M-13
39
For the past 50 years, it was recognised that there was a need to find a unique reference system for the
whole globe, on which to present cartographic, geodetic and gravimetric products. The advent of satellite
geodesy has made the adoption of single geocentric references essential and advanced the need to create a
good middle approximation for every part of the globe.
The first systems with these characteristics were developed by the Department of the Defence of the
United States: WGS60, WGS66 and WGS72 were increasingly reliable models of terrestrial physical
reality, the culmination being the creation of WGS84.
WGS84 is the acronym for ‘World Geodetic System 1984’ and it defines the system as geodetic and
universal in 1984. It is represent by an OXYZ Cartesian system with the origin at the centre of the
Earth’s conventional mass and Z axis directed towards the conventional earth North Pole (CTP.
Conventional Terrestrial Pole), as defined by BIH (Bureau International Le Heure) in 1984, today named
IERS (International Earth Rotation System). The X axis is at the intersection of the origin meridian plan
passing through Greenwich, defined by IERS in 1984, and the CTP referred to the equatorial plane. The
Y axis completes a clockwise orthogonal rotation and lies on the equatorial plane at 90° east to the X axis.
The Cartesian terms match the Earth. The co-ordinate origin and axes are also at the centre of mass and
the axes of the ellipsoid are coincident with the system (ellipsoid bi-axis, geocentric WGS84), the Z axis
is the axis of symmetry.
EUREF, the IAG (International Association of Geodesy) sub-commission, which is responsible for the
European Terrestrial Reference System realisation (ETRS), approved the European Terrestrial Reference
Frame (ETRF) in 1989. The ETRF89 system is a realisation of the WGS84 system.
2.2.3 Datum transformation
With the development of a unique model, it became possible for all charts to be on only one reference
system; however the transformation of charts from one datum to another is not a simple operation. For
this reason many charts in circulation today are still referred to old systems.
Cartesian co-ordinates referred to a geocentric system or geographical co-ordinates referred to a

geocentric ellipsoid are generated via satellite positioning techniques. To transform these co-ordinates
into the local system related to the operational area, it is necessary to apply algorithms with parameters
determined by means of probability computations in order to adapt the very precise satellite measured
results to the net realised by the local system with its inevitable deformations.
Every ellipsoid, which is locally oriented, inevitably shifts from the geocentric one adopted in the WGS84
system, not only due to the different parameters but, importantly, also for centre position and axis
orientation. Therefore, the geographical co-ordinates for the same point in the local datum and in the
global one are different, the shifts translated into distances can be of hundreds metres.
The diagram shows the dimensional differences between the ellipsoid of Hayford and the corresponding
WGS84:
M-13
40
WGS84 Hayford
Equatorial Polar
System Semi-Axis Semi-Axis
[m] [m]
WGS84 6 378 137 6 356 752.31
ED50 6 378 388 6 356 911.95
Note that the WGS84 ellipsoid is smaller both in the equatorial and polar dimensions.
The variations in dimension and origin are reflected in geodetic latitude (or ellipsoidal) and in the North
horizontal co-ordinates (Gaussian) of a point on the earth’s surface; the same occurs with ellipsoidal
longitude and East co-ordinates.
The comparison with the geographical co-ordinates risks creating considerable confusion in the
evaluation of horizontal co-ordinates definable by the adoption of the Gauss (UTM) representation. In
fact, shifts in Gaussian co-ordinates are not the same as linear value shifts in ellipsoidal co-ordinates.
This is because the length of the arc subtended by a degree of latitude or longitude depends on the
dimension of the ellipsoid and also because it changes the point of origin. It is therefore vital to provide
users with complete information and the necessary training to understand the problems.
To transform geographical and horizontal co-ordinates from one system to another it is necessary to apply
to every point some variation in Δϕ, Δλ, ΔN, ΔE, which are functions of the point; the shifts to be applied
to every point alter with the position.
The transformation between two different local datums, in a same area, is often performed using
empirical methods, based on the fact that the two reference surfaces, even though different, are very
similar and the principal difference is one of orientation. In the case of the transformation between a
global geocentric system, such as the WGS84, and a local geodetic system, the two surfaces are separated
from each other and it is therefore necessary to apply more general algorithms of transformation.
Datum transformation has assumed considerable importance with the advent of GPS; in practice it is
usually necessary that a GPS survey includes some points from the old geodetic system in which the
survey must be structured; it is thus possible to calculate suitable transformation parameters which are
valid for the immediate area of interest.
The simplest and most commonly used method consists of assuming the existence of a rotation and
translation of the axes with a scale factor in the Cartesian systems connected to the aforementioned
ellipsoids:
M-13
41
X X 1 E E X
2 0 Z Y 1
Y = Y + (1 + K ) ⋅ E 1 E ⋅Y (2.1)
2 0 Z X 1
Z Z E E 1 Z
2 0 Y X 1
Where:
(X1 Y1 Z1) Cartesian co-ordinates of a point in the first system (S1);
(X2 Y2 Z2) Cartesian co-ordinates of the same point in the second system (S2);
(X0 Y0 Z0) co-ordinates, in S2, of S1 origin;
(1 + K) scale factor;
(Ex, Ey, Ez) rotations around S1 axes (expressed in radians and acting in anti-clockwise
sense).
Such a model implies the perfect geometric congruence, except for scale factor, between all the points of
the geodetic network, determined with GPS methods (for example in S2) and the same points, determined
with the traditional techniques of triangulation and trilateration in S1. Naturally, this is not always the
case in reality, mainly due to distortions induced in the classical geodetic networks from the propagation
of errors which inevitably characterise the traditional procedures of measurement. The relationship (2.1)
holds in most cases if it is applied within the limited extensions of the networks.
If together with it (2.1) the following formulae are used:
⎧ X = (N + h) ⋅ cos φ ⋅ cos λ a
⎪ N=
⎨Y = (N + h) ⋅ cos φ ⋅ sin λ 2
cos2φ + (1− α) ⋅ sinφ
[ ]
with (2.2)
⎪
⎩Z = (1 − α ) ⋅ N + h ⋅ sin φ
2
They connect the geodetic co-ordinates ϕ, λ, & h related to the ellipsoid with semi-axis ‘a’ and ellipticity
(or compression or flattening) α, with the co-ordinates X, Y & Z related to the geocentric associate
Cartesian system, the transformation formulae between the different systems are produced in geodetic co-
ordinates.
The seven parameters, knowledge of which are necessary to apply (2.1), can be determined, in a local
system, as the solution of a least squares adjustment, in which the observed quantities are the co-ordinates
(Cartesian or geodetic) of a certain number (> 3) of points in the network, obtained via both GPS
observations in S2 and classical terrestrial methods in S1.
2.2.4 Vertical datum
The first element necessary for the definition of height is the reference surface.
Once this is established, the orthogonal direction necessary for the measurement of elevation is specified,
while the scale along that direction evolves from the reference system realisation.
As a result of the way these elements are selected, different systems of heights can be defined:
M-13
42
a. ‘h’ Ellipsoidal height: adopting as the reference surface a bi-axial ellipsoid;

b. ‘H’ Orthometric height (or elevation above Geoid surface): choosing as the reference an
equipotential surface of gravity strength field, approximate to the MSL isolated from the
periodic oscillations and shielded from the a-periodic ones (Geoid).
The second system enables the preservation of the physical meaning of height on the MSL. However,
mathematical complications arise when determining the difference between the two surfaces (ellipsoid –
geoid), known as geoidal undulation, knowledge of which is necessary to connect the two systems of
heights.
The following figure shows the main relationship between ellipsoidal height h and orthometric H.
Fig. 2.5 "Vertical Datum"
In a first approximation, to within a few millimetres:
hp = Hp + Np (2.3)
hp is measurable with the GPS, while Hp is observable with levelling operations corrected for gravimetric
observations; Np (geoid height or undulation) is the elevation above the surface of the projected point P
on the Geoid along the geoid vertical (plumb line). This formula is an approximation because it does not
consider length differences between the normals or different scale factors which result from the different
kinds of observations. For cartographic purposes the error produced by this approximation can normally
be ignored.
For the traditional altimetry in cartographic work, MSL is conventionally assigned zero elevation (or
level), since the surface of the sea is available from almost every where. The MSL is sufficiently
determined from tide gauge observations over a long period to filter it from the short term affects of tide.
The SP-32 (IHO – Fifth Edition 1994) defines MSL as “the average HEIGHT of the surface of the SEA at
a TIDE STATION for all stage of the TIDE over a 19-year period, usually determined from hourly height
readings measured from a fixed predetermined reference level (CHART DATUM)”.
M-13
43
For a specific area of interest, the local Geoid is defined as the equipotential surface of the gravity
strength field for a pre-determined point within the same area (usually a point on or near the coastline
located at the conventionally defined MSL height).
Starting from this point, assumed as the fundamental zero level reference, using techniques of geometric
levelling, it is possible to attribute a geoidal height to each point, known as benchmarks, in a network
which extends over on the whole area, the elevation reference frame.
Depending on where we stand, the MSL can be nearer or farther away from the Earth’s centre in
comparison with another point; the elevations do not benefit from a global definition of the mean level of
the sea and presently there is no global elevation reference system which enables unification or the direct
comparison to be achieved between heights measured in various elevation systems.
2.3 Co-ordinates systems
The position is usually defined through curvilinear co-ordinates such as the latitude, the longitude and the
height above the reference surface. In this case it is providing a position in (2+1) dimensions.
It is correct and necessary to distinguish between the following co-ordinate systems:
a. Plane rectangular (Grid);

b. Spherical;
c. Ellipsoidal (Geodetic);
d. Geoidal (Astronomical).
according to whether the plane, the sphere, the ellipsoid or the geoid is used as the surfaces of reference.
The ellipsoidal co-ordinates are also termed geodetic, while the geoidal co-ordinates are the astronomical
ones.
According to this interpretation, the term ‘geographical co-ordinate’ is a general term which includes the
types mentioned in c and d.
2.4 Principles of cartography
The representation of the ellipsoid on a plane (horizontal) surface is the fundamental problem and
objective of Cartography.
Such a problem is made more complex by the ellipsoidal surface not being developable (or of the
spherical surface in narrower field) on a plane surface. Thus it is not possible to transfer details from a
three dimensional reference surface to a paper plan without the parameters which describe them
(distances, areas, angles) suffering considerable deformations. Finding the best method of achieving this
transfer will be focussed, therefore, towards the removal of some of them, or towards containing them
within acceptable limits.
According to the selected method there are:
a. Charts in which distances are preserved (equidistant charts): this condition cannot be
achieved for the whole paper, only along particular directions. It means along certain lines
that the relationship (scale) is preserved between the measured distances on the paper and the
measured distances on the reference surface;
M-13
44
b. Charts in which the areas are preserved (equivalent or equal area charts): this condition can
be achieved over the whole paper. It means that the relationship is preserved between a
measured area on the paper and a measured area on the reference surface. Linear and angular
deformations are introduced, however, which create alterations of shape;
c. Charts in which the angles are preserved (conformal charts): this can also be achieved over
the whole paper. It means that the measured angle between two geodetics transformed on the
paper is equal to the angle between two corresponding directions on the reference surface
(ellipsoid or sphere);
d. Charts in which the scale is the same in all directions at any point (orthomorphic charts):
angles round a point are preserved and small shapes are not distorted over the entire paper;
e. Charts in which none of the element above is rigorously preserved but where the relative
deformations are contained within suitable tolerances (aphilatic or not orthomorphic charts).
Three indices allow the evaluation of the deformation entity, and therefore to calculate relative
corrections. They are termed ‘forms of linear, superficial and angular deformation’ and they are
respectively given from:
m l = dl' /dl
m s = dS' /dS (2.4)
m α = α '−α
where with dl’, dS’& α’ being the geometric elements belonging to the paper and with dl, dS & α the
corresponding elements for the ellipsoid (α’- α is the angle by which the element ds has to rotate to get
itself to ds'). The linear and superficial elements must be infinitesimally small to be able to quickly
identify the size of the deformations.
The choice of the cartographic system depends on the purpose for which the chart is being produced. If
the chart is to be used for navigation, it will have to be conformal. The angles on the paper (for example
the angles between the courses marked on the paper and the meridians) will replicate, without variations,
the direction of the vector angle.
The procedure, through which a connection is established between the points of the ellipsoid and the
points of the cartographic plane, can be:
a. Geometric: which consists of establishing a projective relationship between them through

appropriate geometric constructions, followed by relative analytical processes (trigonometric
in general);
b. Analytical: consists of establishing a non-projective analytical connection between the
points. It is necessary to write a system of equations which links the geographical co-
ordinates of the various points on the ellipsoid to the orthogonal plane co-ordinates on the
sheet referred to an appropriate system of axes.
The first method of chart construction is named ‘projection’, the second ‘representation’. The two
methods are not incompatible, each system can be articulated through an arrangement of equations and
appropriate projective systems can correspond to various analytical systems, even if they are sometimes
approximate.
In modern cartography it is preferable to build charts through "representations".
M-13
45
Mixed systems exist in which selected elements of the network are transformed with one system and other
elements with another. Such systems are termed ‘projections or modified representations’, they are
commonly used in chart construction due to the particular characteristics they confer on the end product,
which would not have been created in a pure projection or representation.
2.5 Projections
2.5.1 Perspective (or geometric) projections
To reproduce an ellipsoid determined section of a chart, it is necessary to study the centre of the area and
to find the tangent plane to the ellipsoid at that point. It is then possible to project the ellipsoid geometric
figures on such a plane from a suitable centre of projection.
Depending on the selected position for the point of projection, various transformations are produced, each
with particular characteristics.
The centre of projection can be set:
a. at the ellipsoid centre (centre graphic or azimuthal projection): the charts produced with this
system are useful for navigation, because the transformation of the arcs of maximum
curvature of the single local spheres produces segments of straight lines on the plane of
projection;
b. in relation to the point diametrically opposite to the zone to be represented (stereographic
projection): it is the only conforming perspective projection and it is generally used for polar
zones cartography;
c. at the extension of the diameter, but external to the ellipsoid (‘scenographic’ projection);
d. always on the same diameter but at infinite distance (orthographic projection).
2.5.2 Conic projections
The conic projection consists in taking a conic surface positioned according to the portion of ellipsoid for
which the paper has to be created and projecting the ellipsoid on the conic surface from the centre of the
ellipsoid. Subsequently, the conic surface will be turned into a plane and the chart so produced will not
be deformed (equidistant) along the line of tangent; elsewhere it is aphilatic or not orthomorphic. The
most common case is represented by the ‘direct conic projection’, which, in order to make it conformal,
Lambert has maintained unchanged the projection principle for tracing the meridians but he has replaced
an analytical representation system for the projection method for tracing the parallels. This is an
orthomorphic modified projection.
2.5.3 Cylindrical projections
Cylindrical projections are obtained by taking a cylindrical surface, variously prepared, tangent to the
ellipsoid and projecting above it the points belonging to the ellipsoid, from its centre.
Among the numerous possibilities of position for the projection cylinder, we are going to consider two
which originate, after the development on the plane, the two cartographic systems most used: the direct
cylindrical projection and the inverse one.
M-13
46
2.5.3.1 Direct cylindrical projection
The projection cylinder is a tangent to the equator and it has a coincident axis with the terrestrial ellipsoid
smaller axis. The meridian and parallel grid (graticule) transforms itself, from that cylinder, in a series of
straight lines orthogonal between them. The projection is aphilatic or ‘not orthomorphic’ in an equatorial
band; it is conformal only for parallels and meridians, deformations are small in proximity of the equator
but they grow approaching the poles.
The direct cylindrical projection can be made conformal and orthomorphic introducing an analytical
connection between the parallels on the ellipsoid and the parallels on the chart; it remains the projection
origin of transformed meridians.
The modified chart obtained in this way, termed Chart of Mercator (or Mercator projection), has the
advantage of being conforming and presenting geographical grids transformed as straight lines orthogonal
between them. In summary, this appears to be the ideal cartographic system for the equatorial area. For
areas at the mean latitudes, a cylindrical surface intersecting the ellipsoid can be considered: there will no
longer be an absence of deformations on the equator, but there will be on the two selected parallels,
reductions in the band between and expansions in the external zones.
Additionally, the Chart of Mercator allows the navigation using ‘loxodrome or rhumb line’. Though not
representing the shortest distance between two points, which is the geodesic or orthodrome, the
loxodromes are followed for short distances, because the route angle can easily be equated to the mean;
for this reason, such charts are of usually employed for navigation.
2.5.3.2 Transverse cylindrical projection
The projection cylinder is tangent to a meridian with axis placed above the equatorial plan and the
ellipsoid surface is projected above it from the centre of the ellipsoid itself. Deformations do not take
place on the meridian of tangency; but they increase with increasing distance from it.
Meridian and parallel grid (graticule) are transformed into a net of curves that intersect at the same angles.
The affect of the deformation is limited by reducing the zone to be projected, achieved by dividing the
terrestrial surface into zones of limited width (generally 15° of longitude), and by projecting them above a
cylinder tangent to their central meridian, along which deformations are avoid. To reduce deformations
further, intersection of the cylinder, rather than a tangent, can be introduced. In such a method, the
absence of deformation does not occur on the central meridian, but on two intersecting lines which are
symmetrical to it: in the area enclosed between these lines there are contractions, while outside these
zones there are increasing expansions.
2.5.4 Representations
The Gauss representation, which is the basis for official cartography of many countries, ‘analytically’
transforms the geographical grid (fig. 2.6), through very complex equations of correlation, in a network
very similar to that obtained through the inverse cylindrical projection, by conferring on it the
fundamental characteristic of conformity (in addition to those common to projections: rectilinearly
between equator images and a meridian, and equidistance along a meridian).
The absence of equidistance (except for the selected central meridian) involves scale variation on the
paper, in relation to the position of the measured element. The deformation increases with distance from
the central meridian and equator. To reduce deformations the surface to be represented is carefully
M-13
47
delineated; the ellipsoid is divided into zones with the central meridian (or zone meridian) chosen as the
reference meridian on which the equidistance is achieved.
Through the correspondence formulae or Gauss equations, it is possible to obtain the cartographic co-
ordinates, and therefore the plane, of the preset points on the ellipsoid (e.g. nodes of the geographical
grid) on a plane representation X-Y (or N-E), remembering that the transformed meridian is shown by the
X axis and that the Y one is shown in the parallel direction to the projection cylinder axis.
Fig. 2.6 “Geographic grid”
On paper, points with the same abscissa or ordinate are discreet straight lines parallel to the axis.
Drawing onto the chart plane some of these straight lines (those corresponding to integer numbers of
kilometres), creates a lattice network of squares, called a ‘grid’.
In modern charts, on the sheets only the grids are shown, while the geographical grid (graticule) is shown
only with traces of parallels and meridians on the sheet margin.
The presence of the grid allows operation in the horizontal field within the whole zone, with the only need
for correction being the distances calculated through co-ordinates with the aid of linear deformation
coefficient. Since the transformed curve of the geodetic is not a straight line segment corrections to the
angles (through ‘chord reduction’) have to be introduced.
The cartographic system based on Gauss representation is internationally recognised as ‘Universal

Transversal Mercator Projection’ or ‘UTM’ because of the analogy with the inverse cylindrical projection
obtainable from the direct cylindrical projection (Mercator).
M-13
48
2.5.5 Universal Transverse Mercator projection
Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) co-ordinates are used in surveying and mapping when the size of
the project extends through several region plane zones or projections and are also utilised by the NATO
Armies, Air Forces and Navies for mapping, charting and geodetic applications.
Differences between the UTM projection and the TM projection are in the scale at the central meridian,
origin, and unit representation:
• The scale is 0.9996 at the central meridian of the UTM projection;

• The northing co-ordinate (NUTM) has an origin of zero at the equator in the Northern
Hemisphere up to latitudes eighty four degrees north (84° N);
• The southing co-ordinate (SUTM) has an origin of ten million meters (10,000,000 m) in the
Southern Hemisphere up to latitudes eighty degrees south (80° S).;
• The easting co-ordinate (EUTM) has an origin five hundred thousand meters (500,000 m) at
the central meridian.
• The UTM system is divided into sixty (60) longitudinal zones. Each zone is six (6°) degrees
in width extending three (3°) degrees on each side of the central meridian.
To compute the UTM co-ordinates of a point, the TM co-ordinates must be determined:
• The UTM northing or southing (NUTM, SUTM) co-ordinates are computed by multiplying
the scale factor (0.9996) at the central meridian by the TM northing or southing (NTM, STM)
co-ordinate values;
• In the Southern Hemisphere, a ten million meter (10,000,000 m) offset must be added to
account for the origin;
• The UTM eastings (EUTM) are derived by multiplying the TM eastings (ETM) by the scale
factor of the central meridian (0.9996) and adding a five-hundred thousand meter (500,000
m) offset to account for the origin;
• UTM co-ordinates are always expressed in meters.
UTM Northings, Southings, and Eastings
Northern Hemisphere: NUTM = (0.9996) NTM

Southern Hemisphere: SUTM = (0.9996) SUTM + 10,000,000 m
Easting co-ordinate: EUTM = (0.9996) ETM + 500,000 m
The UTM zone (Z = UTM zone number) can be calculated from the geodetic longitude of the point
(converted to decimal degrees):
- Z = (180 + λ) / 6 (east longitude)

- Z = (180 – λ) / 6 (west longitude)
If the computed zone value Z results in a decimal quantity, then the zone must be incremented by one
whole zone number.
M-13
49
Example of UTM Zone Calculation:
λ = 15° 12’ 33.5609’’ E

Z = 195.20932247 / 6 = 32.53448
Z = 32 + 1
Z = 33
In the example above, Z is a decimal quantity, therefore, the zone equals seventeen (32) plus one (1).
3. HORIZONTAL CONTROL METHODS
3.1 Introduction
In the hydrographic field, the topographic survey, established to frame geographically the coastal territory
or to create the land marks for hydrographic surveying, is carried out commencing from previously
established topographic stations with co-ordinates already determined by geodetic survey operations.
Such points and the connecting network, termed the primary control, produce the adopted geodetic
reference system (Datum).
Their horizontal determination can be obtained by:
a. classical methods of survey (astronomical observations and measurements of angles and

distances);
b. mixed methods of survey;
c. photogrammetric methods of survey.
The first two methods accomplish the basic control networks, primary or of inferior order, via
triangulation, trilateration and traverse operations. Afterwards, from the points of the primary control, the
control can be extended as required for the particular survey needs with further measurements of angles
and distances.
The development of the satellite technology has allowed the determination both of the stations of a
primary basic control network and the points of the secondary control network to be derived without a
geometric connection between them, until the topographic survey level of a particular site.
3.2 Classic method
3.2.1 Triangulation
3.2.1.1 Principles and specifications
In every country within their national boundaries some points are known, termed trigonometric stations,
monumented in some fixed way and connected to each other in some form of a sequence of triangles,
possibly of equilateral form.
M-13
50
The survey technique, called triangulation, creates, by primarily measuring angles, the determination of
points of a triangular network, with every triangle having at least one common side.
The development, formed by triangles, can be made by continuing the networks (fig. 2.7a) or in a first
phase ‘made by chain’ (fig. 2.7b). This last method has been successfully applied for the survey of states
which are wide in latitude or in longitude (i.e. Argentina).
Additionally the chains can be related to themselves, in the case of a survey of a long and narrow zone; in
such a case it is relevant to a more rigid scheme, such as quadrilateral with diagonals (fig. 2.7c).
Fig. 2.7
Scale in a network can be achieved by the measurement of a single baseline, with all other measurements
being angular. However errors of scale will accumulate through the network and this is best
controlled/corrected by measuring other baselines. (NB. Before the advent of Electronic Distance
Measurement the measurement of distance was a long and difficult task.)
Finally the orientation of the network has to be determined through measurement, by astronomic means,
the azimuth of one side. As with scale, further azimuths should be determined throughout the network in
order to correct/control the propagation of errors.
3.2.1.2 Base and angles measurements
To clarify how a triangulation survey is conducted, the aim is to determine the co-ordinates of points A,
B, C, D, E and F (fig. 2.8); the points are connected so that they form a sequence of triangles. In general
the AC side (normally named “base” in triangulation) and all the angles of the various triangles are
measured: α1, β1, γ1 of the ABC triangle; α2, β2, γ2 of the ABD triangle, and so on.
M-13
51
Fig. 2.8
The base length of the primary triangulation is in the order of about ten kilometres, and therefore, the
measurement of the angles needs particular care; it is necessary to use theodolites reading to one or two
tenth of a sexagesimal second, the purpose being to obtain, with suitable reiterations, the measurement of
the directions with a root mean square error in the order of tenths of seconds.
To achieve measurements within these tolerances, particular importance should be attached to the targets,
which need to be of conspicuously large structure and of suitable colouration. Diurnal or night time
brightly lit targets can be used; the diurnal ones are produced by heliostats (or heliotropes) and at night by
projectors. Both must allow collimation adjustments removed of any phase error and therefore require the
presence of an operator at the point to be collimated.
Therefore in every triangle, having measured all three angles, the precision of each measurement needs to
be verified; to calculate the error of angular closure (or angular closing error) of every triangle, verifying
that the results are less than the pre-fixed tolerance:
εα = ∑α i − 180° ≤ t α (2.5)
where the summation Σαi is the sum of the measured angles with the spherical excess removed; then to
adjust the measured angles using a rigorous method or empirically adding to or subtracting from every
angle a third of the angular closing error.
3.2.1.3 Computation and compensation
Once completed the verification of the tolerance, the first triangle ABC (in fig. 2.8) can be resolved,
knowing a base and the three angles determining the other two in general through the application of the
sine rule:
M-13
52
sin γ1
AB = AC ⋅ (2.6)
sin β1
sin α1
BC = AC ⋅ (2.7)
sin β1
We are now able to resolve the second triangle ABD, having determined its base, always applying the
sine rule and so on.
If there is more than one measured base, it is necessary to use rigorous methods to conduct the
compensation adjustment. The most frequently used method is of indirect observations:
The hyper-determination (over abundance of measurements) of the network allows the compensation
adjustment calculation to be undertaken with a least squares approach.
Then, for instance, taking the ABD triangle (fig. 2.9), the unknown values are generated by the most
probable values of the horizontal co-ordinates of points A, B, D (listed with XA, XB, XD, YA, YB, YD,).
Such co-ordinates are expressed as the sum of an initial approximate value and the relative corrections to
apply to produce the resultant more probable final value by the use of the principle of the least squares.
Once the angular measurements are adjusted, the operations requiring completion are:
a. Formulation of a generating equation for every effected measurement. Particularly we

impose the condition that an angle (i.e. α2), has to be equal to the difference of the two angles
of direction measured on the AD base and on the AB base:
α 2 = (AD) − (AB) (2.8)
from which:
α 2 − (AD) + (AB) = 0 (2.9)
M-13
53
Fig. 2.9
The system of generating equations is an impossible task because the number of the equations
(one for every measurement) is greater than the number of the unknowns (affect of the hyper-
determination method).
The unknowns are contained in the measured angles of direction, they can be expressed in the
following way:
(AD) = arctg [(XD - X A ) (YD - YA )] (2.10)
(AB) = arctg [(XB - X A ) (YB - YA )] (2.11)
Developing in Taylor’s series, the function ‘arctg’ of the two varying Xi and Yi (f[Xi,Yi]) for a
point whose co-ordinates Xi° and Yi° represent the initial approximate co-ordinates of the points
of the triangle, the increments xi and yi from these points constitute the corrections to be applied
to calculate the adjusted final values (more probable value).
For present purposes, the development of the series terms greater than the first degree are
considered negligible and are ignored:
f[X i , Yi ] = f[X i0 , Yi0 ] + ∂ f[X i , Yi ] ∂x (X0 ,Y 0 ) x i + ∂ f[X i , Yi ] ∂y (X0 ,Y 0 ) y i (2.12)
b. Formulation of the system of generated equations, imposing the existence of a observation

residual (vi) resulting from the presence of inevitable accidental errors in the measurements; a
generated equation of the type:
α 2 − ( ΑD) + ( ΑΒ) = ν i (2.13)
M-13
54
Such a system results to being algebraically indeterminate since the number of equations is now
less than the number of the unknowns (having inserted the observation residuals).
c. Formulation of the system of normal equations in the unknowns, corrections xi and yi

introduced in the expression (2.12), resulted in imposing the condition that the sum of the
squares of the observation residual, vi, to be a minimum. At this point the system is
algebraically determinable with the number of equations equal to the number of the
unknowns; it will allow the establishment of the adjusted values of the horizontal co-
ordinates of the points of the triangulation.
3.2.2 Trilateration
This method of surveying is similar to triangulation, as the co-ordinates of a number of points are
calculated by connecting the points in order to form a network of triangles with common sides, but where
the principal measurements are distances not angles.
With the advent of the Electronic Distance Measuring (EDM) equipment and Electro-optic Distance
Measuring (EODM) equipment, trilateration has wide applications and can totally replace triangulations;
however the two methods normally coexist giving rise to mixed networks.
While in triangulations the controlled development of elements (triangles) can be achieved by measuring
three angles for each triangle (control can be immediate through the sum of the three angles), in
trilateration control has to be accomplished by examining adjacent triangles, after having calculated the
angles in terms of the measured sides.
As for triangulations, for primary networks, the creation of a point of origin is always necessary and an
azimuth by astronomical techniques for the control of orientation.
3.2.2.2 Angles and distance measurements
In comparison with triangulation, which can be undertaken by one operator with no requirement for the
targets to be occupied except when using helioscopes or other lighting arrangements, trilateration always
requires the occupation of the targets with prisms or some other form of reflector. This disadvantage is
balanced by the advantage of being able to operate under less than perfect conditions of visibility, which
allows more flexibility in planning and reduces working time.
By using the technique of indirect observations, calculation of compensation follows the same procedure
of that related to triangulations. Generating equations are formulated in relationship to the measurements
of sides and to satisfy the condition given, by Pitagora theorem, to the co-ordinates of points at the
extreme of the measured side.
Taking the triangle in fig. 2.9, the equation relating to measured side AD will be:
(XD - X A )2 + (YD - YA )2 - AD
2
=0 (2.14)
M-13
55
As for triangulations, developing (2.14) in a Taylor’s series, around an approximate value of the co-
ordinates for points A and D (XD°, XA°, YD°, YA°), and considering only the first degree terms of such a
development, the following expression can be produced:
(X 0
D - X 0A )
2
( ) (
+ 2 X D0 - X 0A (x D - x A ) + YD0 - YA0 )2
( )
+ 2 YD0 - YA0 (y D - y A ) - AD = 0
2
(2.15)
where the increases (xD – xA) and (yD – yA) represent the corrections to apply to the initial approximate
values of the co-ordinates, in order to create the adjusted most probable values.
The introduction of observation residuals and the application of the principles of least squares enable the
writing of the algebraically determined system of normal equations for the unknowns xi and yi.
3.3 Mixed method
The combination of angular, triangulation, and distance, trilateration, measurements requires care due to
the different weights for the two methods of measurement. The weight of every observation is inversely
proportional to the variance (μ) of the measurement.
Thus, assuming a root mean square error in angular measurements of ±1'' (equivalent to 4.9·10-6 radians)
and a mean of relative error in distances of 10-5 m, the calculation of weights (applicable to Pα and Pd)
emphasises that:
(
Pα ≈ 10- 6 ) 2
≈ 10-12 (2.16)
(
Pd ≈ 10- 5 )
2
≈ 10 -10 (2.17)
which indicates that angular measurements have an inferior weight 25 times to that of distances.
Thus, for the example, to combine observation equations, where residuals have the same precision of the
associated measurements, resulting from measurements of distances and angles, it will require the angular
equation terms to be multiplied by 100.
3.3.1 Traverse
The traverse surveys are frequently used in topography when undertaking more specific surveys over
large areas or where lines of sight are obscured. These surveys are conducted by determining the co-
ordinates of numerous points, connected to form a polygonal network. With the exception for the first
and last points, the stations in a traverse have to be accessible and generally each station is visible from
both the preceding and the following, marks for measurement of angles and distances.
Whether the first and last points of a polygonal network coincide or not, a traverse can be either closed or
open. Whether absolute co-ordinates of some stations are known or not, it can be either oriented or not
oriented.
M-13
56
In old topographical models, triangulation was the only available technique for creating a network of
points over a wide area. Traverses were reserved for connecting points of the lowest order within a
detailed survey. If the area was very small, a small network for closed traverse was surveyed; but if the
area was large and the chart had to be at a large scale within the nearest known stations, the traverse
connected the triangulation points and it was said to be open. Now days the use of EDM or EODM
enables the survey of traverses over many kilometres and the programming of the surveys with more
accurate traverses, which can directly connect to points of a national primary triangulation, completely
replacing inferior order triangulation.
A significant defect with traverses is in the progressive increase of the error in the direction of progress,
such error is the algebraic sum of all the errors created in the measurements of angles and distances from
each mark, known as propagation of errors.
3.3.1.2 Base and angle measurements
In relationship to the measurements, of which there has to be at least one distance, the traverse can be:
a. Iso-determined: number of measurements equal to the number of the unknowns (co-

ordinates of stations). If ‘n’ is the number of marks, the number of measurements necessary
is equal to (2n – 3);
b. Over-determined: number of redundant measurements in comparison to those necessary,
thus there is a possibility to effect a control of the accidental errors, to adjust them and finally
to obtain an evaluation of the precision of the final results. Furthermore, given the lower
number of possible redundant measurements, the degree of over-determination can be at the
most 3; empirical methods are applied for the adjustment of traverses rather than rigorous
ones.
It is understood that the horizontal angles in association with the points of a traverse are those which are
produced by making a clockwise rotation from the preceding direction towards the direction of advance.
The calculation of the angles at a point in a traverse is therefore rigorous; knowing the angles of a
direction it is possible to calculate the difference between the forward and back angles, if the difference is
negative it is necessary to add 360°.
This is called the ‘rule of transport’; a direction at a point Ai is given by the sum of the direction at the
preceding point Ai-1 and the angle to the point Ai, the measured angle between the two sides; if necessary
360° are added to or subtracted from the result to give a direction between 0° and 360°.
M-13
57
3.3.2 Not Oriented Open Traverse (iso-determined)
Reference fig. 10, the calculations to be developed in succession are:
Fig. 2.10
a. Calculation of the angles of direction of the sides through the rule of the transport,
remembering that the angle of initial direction (AB) it is obtained from the established local
reference system (with direction of the x-axis on the first AB side and y-axis orthogonal to it).
For example the angle of direction (BC) it is:
(BC) = (AB) + α 2 ± 180° (2.18)
b. Calculation of the initial co-ordinates, having defined as a partial reference system those
centred on the preceding point to that being observed, with axes (indicated in the figure by x’
y’ , x’’ y’’) parallel to those initially described. For example, the co-ordinates of point C in
comparison to point B are:
x C(B ) = BC ⋅ sin (BC) (2.19)
y C(B ) = BC ⋅ cos(BC ) (2.20)
c. Calculation of the final co-ordinates in comparison with the first local reference system
centred on point A, which has the co-ordinates XA = 0 and YA = 0. The final co-ordinates of
point B are:
XB = X A + x B ( A )
(2.21)
YB = YA + y B ( A )
and so on for the following points.
M-13
58
It is important to notice that having the number of the measurements (angles αA αB and distances AB, BC,
CD) equal in number to the unknowns (XB XC YC XD YD final co-ordinates) the structure is iso-
determined and it is therefore not possible to perform an adjustment or to appraise the precision of the
final results.
3.3.3 Oriented Open Traverse (over-determined)
Reference fig. 2.11, the known elements of the problem are the absolute co-ordinates of the first and last
stations of the traverse, A and D, relative to an external reference system (such as a national local Datum)
and the co-ordinates, always in relation to the same reference system, of external points, P and Q, which
serve to create the hyper-determination of the network. The measurements (angles αA αB αC αD and
distances AB, BC, CD) are more related to the unknowns represented by the absolute co-ordinates of the
intermediary points (XB YB XC YC), for every additional measurement there will be an equation of
adjustment created.
Fig. 2.11
The calculations to be developed are:
a. Calculation of the angles of direction, often known as the azimuths, unadjusted with the rule
of the transport, starting from the first angle of direction (PA) already adjusted and
calculated:
(PA ) = arctg [(X A - XP ) (YA - YP )] (2.22)
For example, the unadjusted angle of direction for the side DQ (equal to (DQ)') is:
(DQ)' = (CD) + α D ± 180° (2.23)
M-13
59
b. Formulation of the first adjustment equation making use of the opportunity to calculate the
final adjusted angle of direction (DQ):
(DQ) = arctg [(XQ - XD ) (YQ - YD )] (2.24)
The condition, to be imposed at this point, is the equality among the already adjusted calculated
value of (2.24) and the unadjusted in (2.23). The equation is:
(DQ)' − (DQ) = 0 (2.25)
With the unavoidable presence of accidental errors in the measurements of angles αA ,αB ,αC ,αD,
which are present in the calculation of (DQ)', (2.25) will never be satisfied because of the
presence of residuals called ‘error of angular closing’ and are termed Δα. The (2.25) then
becomes:
(DQ)' − (DQ) = Δα (2.26)
remembering that Δα has to be smaller than an angular tolerance established for the project.
c. Calculation of the adjusted angles of direction:
(AB) = (AB)' − uα
(BC) = (BC)' − 2uα
(CD) = (CD)' − 3uα (2.27)
(DQ) = (DQ)' − 4uα

gives uα, where u represents ‘the unitary error of closing’ equal to the relationship between the
error of angular closing and the number of the angles not adjusted on which to share it.
d. Calculation of the partially unadjusted co-ordinates, having defined the partial reference
systems centred on the points and with parallel axes to those of the absolute system at the
start. For example the partial unadjusted co-ordinates of point B relative to A are:
x B ( A ) = AB sin (AB )
'
(2.28)
y B ( A ) = AB cos(AB )
'
e. Formulation of the second and third equations by imposing the condition that the sum of all
the partial co-ordinates is equal to the difference between the absolute co-ordinates of the last
and the first points. There are two equations because one relates to the abscissas and the
other to the ordinates:
M-13
60
∑ x − (X
'
D − XA ) = 0
(2.29)
∑ y − (Y
'
D − YA ) = 0
Likewise in the case of the angles, the equations will never be satisfied because the residuals,
which are termed ‘error of linear closing in abscissas’ and ‘error of linear closing in ordinates’,
are equal to:
Δx = ∑ x ' − ( X D − X A )
(2.30)
Δy = ∑ y ' − (YD − YA )
Defining ΔL as:
ΔL = Δx 2 + Δy 2 (2.31)
Δx and Δy have to be such that ΔL is not greater than an established linear tolerance.
f. Calculation of the partially adjusted co-ordinates:
x 2(1) = x '2(1) − u x y 2(1) = y '2(1) − u y

x 3 (2 ) = x '3 (2 ) − u x y 3 (2 ) = y '3(2 ) − u y (2.32)
x 4 (3 ) = x '4 (3 ) − u x y 4 (3 ) = y '4(3 ) − u y
where ux and uy represent the values of the unitary linear errors of closing and are equal to the
relationship between the error of linear closing, related to the abscissas and to the ordinates and
the number of partially unadjusted co-ordinates on which to share it in a uniform manner.
g. Calculation of the total co-ordinates (absolute) of the unknown intermediary points (B and C)
departing from the known values of the initial point A and adding the values of the following
partial co-ordinates.
XB = X A + x B ( A ) YB = YA + y B ( A )
(2.33)
X C = XB + y C(B ) YC = YB + y C(B )
3.3.4 Not Oriented Closed Traverse
Reference fig. 2.12, the known elements of the problem are represented by the co-ordinates of station A,
in which the origin of the local reference Cartesian system has been settled with the x-axis in the direction
of the first measured side AB, and from the ordinate, equal to 0 in the same local Cartesian system, of the
second position B. The ten measured elements are all the inside angles and sides of the polygon, while
the seven unknowns (XB XC YC XD YD XE YE) determine a hyper determination of a maximum possible
Order 3.
M-13
61
Fig. 2.12
The calculation has the following phases:
a. control and angular adjustment, imposing that the sum of the unadjusted measured angles is
equal to the sum of the inside angles of a polygon with ‘n’ sides ((n-2) 180°). Due to the
inevitable accidental errors, the following observation residuals (error of angular closing Δα)
are generated:
Δα = ∑ α ' − (n − 2) ⋅ 180° (2.34)
such that the result is smaller than a fixed tolerance. The unitary closing error ‘uα’ (equal to
angular closing error divided by the number of measured angles) has to be uniformly shared
between all the measured angles.
α1 = α1' − uα
(2.35)
α 2 = α 2 ' − uα
and so on. The calculated angles are now adjusted.
b. calculation of direction angles (in comparison to local system y-axis direction) using the rule
of transport.
c. calculation of the unadjusted partial co-ordinates with (2.19) and (2.20).
M-13
62
d. control and side compensation, imposing that the sum of all the partial abscissas is zero (the
same for ordinates). Taken into account in the calculation of the unadjusted partial co-
ordinates, this condition will not be satisfied resulting in the residues Δx and Δy (side closing
errors). Defined the quantity ΔL as:
ΔL = Δx 2 + Δy 2 (2.36)
Δx and Δy have to be such that ΔL is not greater than an established linear tolerance. The unitary
error of closing to be shared between the ux unadjusted partial abscissas; it is equal to the
relationship between the side closing error of the abscissas and the number of co-ordinates to be
calculated. While the unitary error related to uy ordinates must be calculated by dividing by the
number of co-ordinates to be calculate less 1. This is because the co-ordinates of point B, in
comparison to the origin at A (yB(A)), are unadjusted (fixed at 0 by axis choice), in order not to
change the local Cartesian system orientation. It is now possible to proceed with the adjustment
of partial co-ordinates, by subtracting ux and uy from the values of abscissas and of unadjusted
ordinates, as detailed in (2.32), with the only exception for the value yB(A), which is fixed at 0, as
already stated.
e. calculation of the total co-ordinates with (2.21).
3.4 Photogrammetric method (also see Chapter 6)
Photogrammetry is a widespread technique for topographic surveying of the ground or objects through the
use of photographs taken from different view points.
Conventional Photogrammetry is usually divided into two categories:
a. Terrestrial Photogrammetry, in which the photographs are taken from points on the ground;
b. Aerial Photogrammetry, in which photographs are taken from aircraft.
Such distinctions do not relate to the procedures of restitution, which are in principle the same, but to the
methods and procedures used to obtain the images.
To ensure the topographical restitution of the photographed object it is necessary to have at least two
images of the point of interest taken from two different positions. If the position of the cameras is known,
the spatial co-ordinates of the points of interest on the two photographs can be calculated from the two
straight lines intersecting the images with the relative optic centres. This is the fundamental principle of
photogrammetry and it is common to all the techniques of photogrammetric survey.
During a photogrammetric survey there are three quantities, connected in different ways at various points
of the survey. They are:
a. The three-dimensional co-ordinates (X, Y, Z) of the photographed objects;

b. The horizontal co-ordinates (x, y) of the images of the objects photographed on the plane of
the film;
c. The entire parameters of the orientation, required to establish the position of the camera
during the photograph.
M-13
63
At the moment of exposure two groups of quantities are assigned, although they may not be numerically
known at the time: the co-ordinates of the photographed objects and the parameters of the orientation,
i.e. the position and the optic characteristics of the camera. From knowledge of the real spatial co-
ordinates and the horizontal co-ordinates on the film of some known points, the parameters of the
orientation can be calculated. Finally in the restitution phase, with the parameters of orientation
calculated, it is possible to determine the co-ordinates of all the observed points using the horizontal co-
ordinates on the photogram.
One of the most important applications of photogrammetry is in cartographic production at variable scales
from 1:500 to 1:50.000.
3.4.1 Aerophotogrammetry (Air photogrammetry)
Almost all charts are created by air photogrammetry. Due to this technique it is possible to generate
topographical charts of large areas in relatively short times, instead of the many years required for
traditional techniques.
Aerial photographs can be produced in different ways, depending on the kind of chart to be created and
on the kind of camera to be used. Air photogrammetry generally employs cameras with nadir
photographs (also called nadir point or plumb point), that is with the optic axis coincident with the
vertical axis. This has the advantage of providing photograms with a constant scale if the ground is flat as
well as allowing photogram stereoscopic observation.
Even if suitably enlarged, aerial photograms can not be used as maps of the photographed territory. The
aerial photograph is a central perspective, while maps are produced with an orthogonal projection of the
ground on the reference surface. Due to this difference, a vertical segment, which would be represented
by a point in a map, is represented by a segment on a photograph.
Another difference between photography and cartographic representation is due to the fact that in the
photogram the scale factor is definable only in the case when the object is perfectly horizontal and the
axis of the camera strictly vertical. If in the observed area there are height differences, the scale of the
photogram will vary from point to point and only an average scale can be defined; the choice of the
average scale will determine the flight altitude.
To guarantee the fundamental principles of photogrammetry, each point of the area of survey has to be
taken in separate photos, thus the two adjacent photograms have to result in an overlap of 50% of their
length. To avoid the risk that some areas will not have this overlap due to variations in aircraft speed, a
60-70% overlap is normally adopted. The succession of photograms in a longitudinal direction is called a
continuous-strip. Generally, it is necessary to take various continuous-strips, which are then placed
transversally over each other to achieve an overlap of 15-30% of the photogram width to compensate
inevitable aircraft drift.
3.4.1.1 Photogrammetric restitution
After having completed the survey, the two resulting photograms represent, from two different points, a
perspective projection of the object. The photogram pairs are used for the restitution of the surveyed
objects, through either complex equipment (stereoscopic plotting instruments) or a simple stereoscope,
which allows the simultaneous observation of the objects via its binocular optical ability, allowing each
eye to see only one photograph.
M-13
64
With stereoscopic photogrammetry the survey is not made on the plane, as with the traditional methods
which obtain measurements from reality, but from a stereoscopic model (or stereomodel), observable
through a pair of photographs, which dimensionally reconstruct it in an appropriate scale. In the
traditional methods, a limited number of points are surveyed, while in photogrammetry the object is
totally surveyed and subsequently the co-ordinates of the points of interest can be determined.
3.4.1.2 Analogue restitution
In analogue restitution the ground model is constructed by optic-mechanic means, from whose
observation the paper can be drawn.
To be able to proceed to the restitution it is necessary to know, with great precision, the parameters of the
interior orientation (or inner orientation):
a. The calibrated focal length of camera’s objective lens;

b. The co-ordinates on the photogram of the calibrated Principal Point, which represents the
footprint of the perpendicular from the interior perspective centre to the plane of the
photograph (nodal point of the objective). These co-ordinates are calculated in the interior
reference system of the photogram, defined by the intersection of the pairs of index marks
engraved on the middle points of the sides of the photogram.
The procedure for analogue restitution consists of reconstructing the circumstances of the two photograms
at exposure with a geometric similarity between the two configurations. The photograms are placed on
two projectors which must be placed in such way as to show an interior orientation equal to that of the
aerial continuous-strip camera. Then the parameters of the exterior orientation (or outer orientation) have
to be determined, which allow the spatial position of the pair of photograms to precisely known and the
ground model or the photographed object can be recreated. The exterior orientation is divided into:
a. Relative: it defines the position of the second photogram in relation to the first. Six
parameters are necessary, i.e. the three relative co-ordinates of the second nodal point in
relation to those of the first and from the rotations. The calculation of these parameters
produces six pairs of homologous points, whilst manually eliminating the transversal parallax
from each of them. In this way a stereoscopic model is defined, from which no metric
information can be taken because its absolute orientation and the scale are not known;
b. Absolute: it defines the spatial position of the first photogram with reference to an earth
fixed system through known points. Six other parameters are necessary because in space a
body has six degrees of freedom. Generally these six parameters are the xv yv zv spatial co-
ordinates of the nodal point and the three ϕx ϕy τ rotations around three the Cartesian axes
passing through the principal point (fig 2.13).
M-13
65
Fig. 2.13 “Twelve parameters determination for an Analogue Restitution”
The determination of the twelve parameters of the exterior orientation enables a return to the spatial
position of the two photograms during exposure.
Normally the minimum number of ground control points it is five, of which four (known in the three co-
ordinates) are distributed on the edges of the model and a fifth for vertical control, of which only the
height is known, is positioned near the centre of the model. In this way the problem will be hyper-
determined; there will be some residuals of observations, termed residuals of orientation, that allow the
verification of the accuracy of the photogrammetric survey.
The differences of the control points, between the values of the ground co-ordinates and the model co-
ordinates, should not be greater than certain limits.
3.4.1.3 The analytical restitution
Techniques of numerical photogrammetric restitution have been developed with the progress of the
automatic numerical calculation; these methods make use of the computing power of modern computers
to perform the photogrammetric compilation.
3.4.1.4 The digital photogrammetry
Traditional photogrammetry, that is stereoscopic or stereo-photogrammetry, can be achieved by analogue

or analytical methods. In creation, the restitution in the analogue photogrammetry is achieved by optical
systems; the co-ordinates of the observed points in analytical photogrammetry are mathematically
determined.
The digital photogrammetry not only exploits the electronic calculators in the final phase, as in the
analytical restitution, but also for the treatment of the images, which are recorded in digital form.
M-13
66
Traditional photographs can be also employed, initially modifying them through equipment which
transforms the images into digital signals, such as a scanner.
The adoption of the digital images allows the automation of many operations, which must be performed
by the operator such as the definition of the interior and exterior orientation in analytical photogrammetry.
3.4.1.5 Aerotriangulation (Aerial triangulation)
In the conduct of a photogrammetric survey, the co-ordinate determination of the ground control points is
generally the phase which requires the greatest employment of time, at least 5 point for every model,
which is for every pair. To reduce the number required, the co-ordinates of some can be also obtained
through photogrammetric methods, through aerial triangulation.
The determination of the co-ordinates for the control points through the aerial triangulation can be
achieved with the method of independent models. It consists of independently building the relative
orientation of every model from the others; the models are linked through some points, known as tie
points, which are common to the two models (the points common to the three photograms which have
produced them) and are located in the marginal areas of the models themselves. In the end a single block
of models is produced, of a length and width equal to that of the models linked between them. There
would theoretically be only the five control points of the first model; in practice there are essential control
points displaced to the edges and along the perimeter of the block of models and some altimetric points
inside the block.
However, this technique is being overtaken by the employment of the GPS satellite positioning system,
which allows the direct determination of the co-ordinates of the ground control points, whilst at the same
time it offers the possibility of directly installing the GPS receivers in the aircraft.
The co-ordinates of points surveyed during exposure through the GPS receivers, using differential
techniques with a fixed reference receiver on the ground, can be used during the aerial triangulation as
additional data, adopting the method for independent models.
3.5 Inter-visibility of Geodetic Stations
3.5.1 Inter-visibility between two points must ALWAYS be checked in the field during the
reconnaissance. However, many proposed lines can be checked during the office phase by
plotting cross-sections from a map. A clearance of at least 5m, and preferably 10m, should be
allowed on all grazing rays with particular care taken where buildings are shown near ends of
lines.
3.5.2 For long lines, the earth's curvature needs to be taken into account when investigating inter-
visibility. The formula in paragraph 3.5.3 must then be applied.
3.5.3 In fig 2.14, two stations ‘A’ and ‘B’ of heights ‘HA’ and ‘HB’’ are a distance ‘D’ apart. The line
of sight ‘AB’ will be tangential to a sphere concentric to the earth at a height ‘y’ and a distance
‘x’ from ‘A’. The problem is to determine what height of hill ‘h’, distance ‘dA’ from ‘A’, will
obstruct the line of sight.
M-13
67
Fig. 2.14 “Intervisibility of Geodetic Station”
The height of an object distance ‘s’ away, which appears on the horizon to an observer with the eye at
sea-level, is:
2
1
2 −k
Ks , where K = and k = co-efficient of refraction & r = radius of the earth
r
Therefore,
H A − y = Kx 2
H B − y = K (D − x )
2
Whence (2.37)
D ⎛ HB − HA ⎞
x= −⎜ ⎟ and y = H A − Kx 2
2 ⎝ 2 KD ⎠
h = y + K (d A − x )
2
d AH B dB H A (2.38)
Therefore, h= + − Kd A d B
D D
Using this formula all inter-visibility problems can be solved. Care must be taken to use the correct units
of measurement.
When heights are in metres and distances in kilometres, K = 0.0675.
Proof of formula:
h = y + K (d A − x )
2
(2.39)
2
= H A − Kx 2 + Kd A − 2 Kd A x + Kx 2
M-13
68
2 D 2 Kd A H B 2 Kd A H A
= H A + Kd A − 2 Kd A + −
2 2 KD 2 KD
d AH B − d AH A
= H A + Kd A − (Kd A d A + Kd A d B ) +
2
⎛ d H + dB H A ⎞ ⎛ d AH B − d AH A ⎞
=⎜ A A ⎟+⎜ ⎟ − Kd A d B
⎝ D ⎠ ⎝ D ⎠
dB H A d AH B
= + − Kd A d B (2.40)
D D
4. VERTICAL CONTROL METHODS
4.1 Geometric levelling (Spirit levelling method)
4.1.1 Principles and specifications
Levelling are operations which allow the measurement of difference orthometric heights (or Geoid
elevations) between points or their difference in elevation.
The principle of the geometric levelling is: consider two points (A and B) to be a brief distance apart, not
more than around 100 metres (fig. 2.15); two vertical stadia are set-up on them and at point M, equidistant
from A and from B, an instrument which has its axis of horizontal collimation, or rather (for modest
heights) parallel, to the tangent plane in M0 to the Geoid. Two rounds of readings are taken from the
stadia, lA and lB. The following expression can be immediately concluded from the figure, with the
premise that the Geoid coincides, for the brief line being considered, with the local sphere at M0:
Q A + l A = Q B + lB (2.41)
from which:
Q B − Q A = l A − lB (2.42)
where:
QA = Orthometric height (or Elevation) in A

QB = Orthometric height (or Elevation) in B
M-13
69
Fig. 2.15 “Geometric levelling”
Since the length of the observation is such as to make the influence of the terrestrial bending negligible,
the tool which creates the collimation axis can theoretically be put in any intermediary position between
A and B to reduce the influence of the atmospheric refraction.
When the aim is to calculate a difference in levels between points, a distant at which it is impossible to
directly make a connection between them, it is necessary to undertake composite levelling. The distance
between the start point A and the final point B of the levelling line, is divided into a number lines no
greater than 100 metres with the stadia set at the division points.
Fig. 2.16 “Level difference among several points”
M-13
70
Departing from A, the difference between M1 and A is determined as detailed earlier. Thereafter the tool
is transported to a point between M1 and M2, and the level difference (li2 – la2) is determined between these
points (after having rotated the stadia in M1 on itself and transported that at A onto M2); this process is
repeated to the final point. The total difference in elevation will be:
QB − Q A = ∑n (lin − lan ) (2.43)
4.1.2 Measurements and quality control
An effective control of the measurements consists in making levelling runs in both directions, but
returning by a different route of comparable length. The variation, between the values for the difference
in elevation between the start and final points, has to be within established tolerances in relationship to the
desired accuracy. The value to be used is the average between the two runs.
During the operation it is good practice to conduct an alignment control for the spirit level (spirit bubble
or sensitive bubble) of the levelling instrument before every observation to the stadia.
Some levelling instruments are fitted with a circular level (or universal level or bull’s eye level) and the
modern ones are fitted with a self-aligning level.
4.1.3 Sources of error
Putting aside the possible inclination of the line of sight, the accidental errors of every observation can be
separated in two parts:
a. error of collimation (or of reading the stadia): proportional to the square root of the distance
of collimation;
b. error of aligning (or of reading) of the levels (in the auto-levels is replaced by the self-
aligning level of the compensator): proportional to the same distance
The mean error of the entire levelling needs to be considered, supposing that the mean error of every
single observation is constant and equal to σ. Since the total difference in level is equal to the sum of the
partial difference of elevations, subsequently determined, the mean error σt of the whole levelling is:
σ t 2 = σ 1 2 + σ 2 2 + σ 3 2 + ...... + σ n 2 = nσ 2 (2.44)
from which:
σt =σ n (2.45)
4.1.4 Computation and compensation
As with other hyper-determinations, geometric levelling can be empirically adjusted or via rigorous
methods, applying the theory of the least squares.
An elementary adjustment of a levelling line consists of assuming the average between the measurements
conducted in both directions.
M-13
71
An empirical adjustment is applied in levels of limited precision, which are performed without the
repetition of the measurements but close on the vertical datum point of departure (closed polygon) or on
two vertical datum points of known elevations; in this case the closing error is distributed empirically
between the differences in elevations.
With the assumption that the closing error is proportional to the distance over which the level is made
then it is simply a case of dividing the closing error by the total distance levelled to give an error per
metre of levelling. Then each intermediate point is corrected by the error per km of levelling multiplied
by the length of observed level to that point.
The adjustment is more complicated when the lines of levelling constitute a network; in this case it is
necessary to use to a rigorous network adjustment, preferably by the method of the indirect observations.
The unknown quantities of the problem, resolved using the above method, are the corrections to be
applied to the approximate values of elevation of the single points of the network, to consequentially
obtain the most probable values for the structure.
The generating equations impose the condition that the difference between the measured difference of
elevation and consequentially that from the approximation of the network, tends to be zero.
Due to the presence of the inevitable accidental residual errors in the measurements for the difference of
elevations, these equations will not normally be satisfied, for the second constituent they will highlight
the residues of adjustments. The equations in this form are termed generated equations.
With the distances between the vertical datum points being different, it is necessary to consider weights to
assign to the measured differences of elevation; the weights are set to be equal to the inverse to the sum of
the distances.
In order to reduce observations of different precision to the same weight (importance) it is necessary to
scale their equations by the square root of the weight. We will now have a set of equations equal in
number to the observations made. In order to obtain the most probable values for the unknowns (in this
case corrections to the initial values of the elevations) it is necessary to reduce the observation equations
to normal equations using the principle of least squares.
The subsequent solution of the normal equations will produce the unique and mathematically most
probable values to correct the provisional elevations.
The knowledge of the mean error of the unity of weight, which is equal to:
m0 = ± ∑ p ν (n − i )
i
2
i i (2.46)
where:
pi: the measure weights inversely proportional to the distances;

νi: residual accidental errors on the measurements of the difference of elevations;
n: number of the generated equations;
i: number of the unknowns.
M-13
72
It is sufficient to consider the reliability of the task in terms of how much of it is assumed to be unitary
weight 1/1km. If the known terms with the consequent residues of compensation are expressed in
millimetres, m0 represents the mean error in millimetres per kilometre; it is in this form that tolerance is
normally expressed in geometric levelling (remembering that the tolerance or the maximum admitted
error is considered to be equal to three times the mean quadratic error).
4.2 Trigonometric levelling (Trigonometrical heighting)
4.2.1 Principles and specifications
Trigonometric levelling is based on the use of a theodolite for the measurement of zenithal angles. It is
employed for any distances, from a few meters to over 10 kms; it is often used for the determination of
the elevations of positions in triangulation, it is also applied in other cases, such as when the distance
between the points, for which the difference of elevation is required, is already known.
In every case for distances less than around 400 meters, the use of a plane surface of reference involves
negligible errors and it results in simplified calculations with mean errors in the order of 5 cms.
Levelling in this case is termed ‘eclimetric’ and the difference in elevation between two points A and B
(ΔAB) is given by:
Δ AB = d ⋅ cotϕ A + h - l (2.47)
where:
d: is the horizontal distance between A and B (on the plane surface of reference);
φA: is the zenithal angle to B measured by the theodolite at A;
h: is the height of the theodolite related to the ground;
l: is the height of the target at B related to the ground as measured from the theodolite.
Fig. 2.17 “Trigonometric levelling”
The approximation of the plain surface of reference is not acceptable for distances greater than 400
metres. Thus three fundamental corrections must be considered, departing from the simplified
calculations for the “eclimetric” levelling:
M-13
73
a. sphericity;
b. refraction;
c. height.
Taking account of these factors, the procedure for calculating the difference of elevation is termed
trigonometric levelling. Since the distance between two points, between which the difference of elevation
is being determined, is never greater than 20 kms and normally is less, the calculations can always be
performed on the local sphere.
4.2.2 Correction for sphericity
This correction takes into account the bending of the local sphere relative to the plane adopted for the
“eclimetric” levelling, with the assumption of negligible divergence between the normals (to the plane
and the sphere at the point where the stadia is positioned) along which the difference of elevation is to be
obtained.
Fig. 2.18 “Correction for sphericity”
where:
X: is the correction for sphericity;
d: is the plain distance between the two points;
R: is the ray of the adopted local sphere.
Applying the theorem of Pythagoras to the triangle in figure 2.18:
d2 + R 2 = (R + X)
2
(2.48)
developing and dividing both sides by 2R and considering negligible the relationship X2/2R, the
correction for sphericity is given by:
M-13
74
X = d2 2R (2.49)
4.2.3 Correction for refraction
This correction must be introduced to take into account the bending which the light ray experiences when
passing through layers of the atmosphere of different density. Such bending tends always to result in
bending downwards; therefore to a degree it accentuates the error sphericity.
Fig. 2.19 “Correction of refraction”
where:
X: is the correction for sphericity;
Y: is the correction for refraction;
R: is the ray of the adopted local sphere;
ε: is the dependent angle from the refraction coefficient K (≈ 0,14) [ ε = K d / 2R ]
Assuming Y and ε to be small, it is possible to write:
Y =dε (2.50)
and therefore, replacing the expression of ε in the (2.14), see 3.2.2.3 of Chapter 2, we can express it as:
Y = K d2 2R (2.51)
to this point the combination of the corrections of sphericity and refraction, identified in the quantity (X –
Y); it is possible to write as it follows:
M-13
75
(X - Y ) = (1- K )d2 2R (2.52)
4.2.4 Correction of height
The correction for height derives from the fact that the measured distance does not equate with the
horizontal distance, which represents the quantity to use in the (2.47), see 4.2.1 of Chapter 2.
The relationship between ‘dobl’ the oblique distance (measured) and ‘dhor’ the horizontal distance is
defined by:
dhor = dobl ⋅ (1 + Q m R) (2.53)
where Qm represents the arithmetic average between the heights of the two points.
In summary, the formula to be adopted for trigonometric levelling from either end, taking into account of
the three corrections described, is:
Δ AB = d obl ⋅ (1 + Qm R ) ⋅ cotϕ A + (1 - K ) ⋅ d 2 2R + h - l (2.54)
adopting this approach, the weakness is the forecasting of the K coefficient of refraction, particularly for
distances greater than 10 kms.
To remove this, the technique of simultaneous reciprocal trigonometric levelling can be employed, where
two teams simultaneously measuring the two zenithal angles and the two oblique distances from the
selected points. Two equations with two unknown are produced: ΔAB and K. In this way it is no longer
necessary to forecast K.
4.2.5 Sources of error
Because it is possible to consider the errors in the measurement of ‘h’ and ‘l’ as negligible, as well as the
error for the mean height over of the distance (always less than the errors to those of the trigonometric
levelling made over larger distances), for an analysis of the precision of this the simple formula can be
used:
Δ AB = d or ⋅ cotϕ A + (1 - K ) ⋅ d 2 2R (2.55)
from the theory of errors, the mH mean error (in this case a non linear function) of the ΔAB difference of
elevation will be:
⎡⎛ ∂Δ ⎞ 2 ⎛ ∂Δ ⎞
2
⎛ ∂Δ AB ⎞
2
⎤
mH = ± ⎢⎜ AB ⎟ ⋅ m 2d + ⎜⎜ AB ⎟⎟ ⋅ mϕ A + ⎜
2
⎟ ⋅ mK2 ⎥ (2.56)
⎢⎣⎝ ∂d ⎠ ⎝ ∂ϕ A ⎠ ⎝ ∂K ⎠ ⎥⎦
in which md, mφA and mK are respectively the mean errors of the distance, the zenithal angle and the
coefficient of refraction. With the differentiation related to d, φA and K, it is obtained that:
M-13
76
∂Δ AB d
= cot ϕ A + (1 − K ) ⋅ (with the second negligible term)
∂d R
∂Δ AB d
=− 2
∂ϕ A sin ϕ A (2.57)
∂Δ AB d2
=−
∂K 2⋅ R
Analysing the three rooted terms in (2.56), it can be said:
a. in the first term, assuming as the mean error of distance the value of 1/50000 (2 cms for km),
the error in the difference of elevation will depend on α, the angle of inclination, (α = 90° –
φA). With α=0°, the error removes itself. It is however always small (i.e. for α = ±10° and d
= 5km, the error will be 1.6 cms).
b. in the second term, assigning to α a mean value of 10°, the error will depend on the mean
error of φA, the zenithal angle, and from d, the distance, (i.e. m·A = ±10° and d = 5 kms, the
resultant error is 12.1 cms).
c. in the third term, the error is a function of the centre error of K and in this case, of the square
of the distance (i.e. for m·K = ± 0,015 and d = 5 kms, the resultant error is 2.9 cms).
From such analysis it is evident that the greatest influence comes from the errors in the measurement of
the zenithal angles. Thus, the angular measurements should always be undertaken from the two
reciprocal faces of the instrument with the aim of compensating for the errors in instrument zenith. As a
rule it is preferable to carry out the measurements when the K coefficient of refraction is more stable,
which is around midday, even if at these times, due the sun’s heat, the images appear less stable; this
problem is overcome by taking the average of more measurements.
Nevertheless, for distances over some kilometres, the mean errors in the differences of elevation can be
considered proportional to the distances themselves.
4.2.6 Computation and Compensation
In the theory of the errors, the weights of the measurements to be introduced in a calculation for
adjustment are assumed proportional to the inverse of the squares of the mean errors of the measurements
themselves. In this case being proportional to the distances, the weights to attribute to the several
different compensating elevations are inversely assumed proportional to the squares of the distances. It is
only worth considering for trigonometric levelling of medium and long distances, they are normally
applied when undertaking the trigonometric networks of expansion. The trigonometric levelling over
short distances involves detailed surveys and exploits the principle of the tacheometric (or tachymetric)
levelling.
The procedures of adjustment are entirely comparable with those related to geometric levelling, with the
only difference regarding the weights. It has to remember that, given the reliability of the trigonometric
levelling for kilometric distances notably less than that of the geometric levelling, it is acceptable to
conduct empirical adjustments.
M-13
77
4.3 Altimetry with GPS (GNSS Vertical Control Method)
GPS (exploiting the relative positioning) generates the base-line components between the surveyed
positions, from which the XYZ geocentric co-ordinates are obtained in the WGS84 reference system.
The ϕ, λ & h ellipsoidal co-ordinates are obtained with transformation formulae.
However in cartography the orthometric heights H are related to the surface of the Geoid and not the
ellipsoid. Therefore it is important to know the Geoid undulation or its variation at a known points H and
h. Only in small areas (< 10 km) and for cartographic purposes, can the Geoid be approximated to a
horizontal plane.
For larger areas it is necessary to use global models of the Geoid; different global models (i.e. OSU91A,
EGM96) are available in the processing software of GPS data and in the receivers. However these
partially contain the effects of the distribution of local masses. Each national local estimate of the Geoid
is performed by gravimetric measurements. The interpolations of these models produce values of the
undulation N, necessary for orthometric height determination.
These local Geoids are gravimetric and independent from Geoid undulation values obtained from
combining GPS and geometric levelling observations; they are estimated in a geocentric reference that
does not coincide with WGS84 but introduces slight differences in origin of the geocentric axis term and
of orientation of the axes of the reference system.
Therefore between the two reference systems it is necessary to conduct a transformation termed ‘locating
of the Geoid’.
To calculate this transformation, start from the orthometric height values H of some GPS positions,
obtained via geometric levelling operations, and the NWGS84 experimental undulation is evaluate starting
with the ellipsoidal height h derived by the GPS net compensation.
The effect of location δN is:
δN = NWGS 84 − Nlocalgeoid (2.58)
with NWGS84 = h – H.
The datum transformation in the strictest sense is a spatial rotation and translation with scale variation,
but in small areas the altimetric part can be separated, estimating the parameters of the equation of a plane
starting from δN values for at least of three points of which the height is known in both reference systems,
with the following expression:
a1Xi + a 2 Yi + a3 = δNi (2.59)
with Xi and Yi being the cartographic co-ordinates of the points for which the heights are twice measured
and a1 a2 a3 parameters of the plane to be estimated. This plane describes the difference in Datum
between NWGS84 and Nlocalgeoid. The three unknown parameters can be estimated to the minimum squares if
the number of the points with double heights is greater than three.
M-13
78
5. INSTRUMENTS USED TO ESTABLISH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL
5.1 GNSS Receiver (Global Positioning System)
GPS receivers can be classified according to the measurements they are able to acquire and the accuracy
of the final positioning, as will be seen later in the paragraph 6.2:
a. Measures of code receivers: are able to acquire only the transmitted C/A component of the
signal. They are often termed ‘hand-held’ due to the very small size of the receivers; some
can receive a differential correction (in line with the standard protocol RTCM - 104) to
improve the positioning precision. Their exclusive employment is for navigation.
b. Single frequency receivers: in addition to the code C/A, they can also acquire the L1 carrier
phase. They perform positioning with measurements of the code or phase on L1 in absolute,
relative or differential mode.
c. P-code double frequency receivers: are the most capable available in the market and can
acquire all parts of the signal (L1, L2, C/A, P). They perform positioning with measurements
of the code or phase on L1 and L2 (absolute, relative or differential). Thus they can be
employed for all varieties of static and kinematic positioning. They are particularly suitable
for the technique of dynamic initialisation ‘On The Fly’ (OTF).
d. Y-code double frequency receivers: identical to the P-code category, but they can also
acquire the P-code using Anti-Spoofing (A/S).
5.2 Electronic instruments
The measurement of distances using electromagnetic wave distance measuring systems has undergone
notable developments in the past few years; increasingly the producers of topographical instruments are
including electromagnetic wave distance measuring devices in their theodolites. These systems,
internationally termed EDM (Electronic Distance Measuring equipment) or DME (Distance Measuring
Equipment)24, operate in two different ways:
a. measurement of phase;
b. measurement of impulses.
5.2.1 Electronic Distance Measuring of phase
These instruments are based on the theory of the propagation of electromagnetic waves. They propagate
using the sine rule, with speed equal to that of light in the air (cair), which is slightly inferior to that in a
void, being equal to the relationship between the speed in the void (c0) and the index of refraction (νair) of
the air which depends on temperature, pressure and humidity: {cair=c0/νair(t,p,h)}
These electronic distance measuring equipment are made up of three distinct parts: transmitter, reflector
and receiver; the first and the last parts are contained together in the equipment set-up at the occupied
station, the reflector is separate and is placed on the point the distance to which is to be determined.
The transmitter produces a signal at a previously established frequency; the reflector amplifies and
reflects the signal, which is received by a phase discriminator capable of determining the phase difference
between the transmitted and the received signals with an order of precision of a hundredth of radian.
24
(IHO S-32 – fifth edition 1994, # 1406 and # 1576)
M-13
79
Since the signal has covered the distance between the two points twice, there and back, this double
distance could easily be calculated if it were possible to determine the number of integer cycles which
have passed between the transmission and the receipt of the signal. Being unable to determine this
number of integer cycles, which is called the ambiguity, the electromagnetic distance measurements of
phase use three different techniques to get round this problem:
a. the modulation for ten;

b. the method of the three frequencies;
c. the frequency modulation of the signal.
5.2.1.1 The modulation for ten
With this technique two or more signals are sent in sequence with different frequencies, varying multiples
of 10 (hence the name), in order to measure the distance by the phase difference.
The first sent signal has a wavelength greater than double the range of the equipment. In this way the
distance can be determined without ambiguity with the equation:
⎛ λ ⎞ ⎛ Δϕ ⎞
d = ⎜ ⎟⋅⎜ ⎟ (2.60)
⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2π ⎠
where d represents the half double distance.
However, with this method, the distance is determined with low accuracy; if the range of the EDM from
the target was 1 km, the signal would have a wavelength of at least 2 km, then, the distance would be
measured with a precision equal to 1.59 m, applying (2.60) with the precision of the phase discriminator
to 1/100 of radian. Such an error is obviously unsupportable in the measurement of the distances over a
range of 1 km. To remove this problem, after the transmission of the first signal and the calculation of a
first approximate value for the distance, a second signal is transmitted, with a wavelength equal to 1/100
of the previous signal. In this case, the determination of the distance requires the definition of the phase
ambiguity, this is possible having already approximated the distance between the two points with
sufficient precision to calculate it. In this way, the value of the distance is improved 100 times and the
precision achieves, in the above case, a value of 1.6 cms, which could be considered acceptable. It is
possible to transmit another signal of a wavelength equal to 1/100 of the second one, thus improving the
precision to a few millimetres.
5.2.1.2 Method of the three frequencies
It comprises a variation on the previous method, by using two near equal frequencies with wavelengths of
the order of the range of the equipment, which allows the determination of a first approximation of the
distance. A third frequency with a wavelength very much smaller than the first two, enables the fine
determination of the distance.
5.2.1.3 Variation of frequency
With this technique the frequency of the transmitted signal, starting at a set value, is increased (or
decreased) until a zero phase difference is achieved between the transmitted and received signal. The
determination of the distance could be calculated with an equation in which the number of cycles remains
unknown, however, by continuing to increase the frequency (and therefore decreasing the wavelength); a
zero phase difference will again be produced between the transmitted and received signals, when the
M-13
80
number of integer cycles will be increased by a whole number. At this point, from the combination of the
two equations (corresponding to the two values of wavelength) the phase ambiguity can be resolved.
In the first two techniques (modulation for ten and method of the three frequencies), the determination of
the phase difference is necessary. This can be achieved through a phase discriminator composed of a
transformer of sine waves, so that square waves (analogue-digital transformer) are transmitted and
received, and using a counter of the time when the square waves are both positive and negative. This
time is turned into a value of distance. Clearly, to increase the precision of the measure, this calculation is
repeated thousands of times but it takes a few seconds to complete the measurement.
Recently some DME of phase have been produced without with discriminator. They use a mathematical
correlation between the transmitted and received signals for determining the phase difference, enabling
the achievement of greater precisions in the measurements of distance. According to the produced
frequency, the phase DME can be classified as:
a. MDM (Microwave Distance Measurement);

b. EODM (Electro-Optical Distance Measurement) or geodimeters.
The first group use frequencies in the order of the 30 MHz (wavelengths centimetric), they are employed
for determining long distances; in these instruments the reflector is active, that is it is capable of
amplifying the received signal and reflecting it with greater power.
The requirement to alter the frequency of the transmitted signal involves some consideration of and
allowance for the propagation of electromagnetic waves through the atmosphere. In fact only some
ranges of frequency are capable passing through the atmosphere without large losses of power. Infrared
rays (micrometric wavelengths), which require a limited consumption of energy power supply, are not
overly influenced by the solar light, they are used for the determination of distances of 2-3 kilometres; the
centimetric waves, termed Hertzian microwaves, which have wavelengths of a few centimetres, are also
used for the determination of highly elevated distances, also in presence of fogs or precipitations, these
require a significant power supply. If the signal has wavelengths in the visible range, wavelengths
included between 0.3 and 1 micro-metre, the waves are created with specific optic systems and reflected
with simple mirrors or prisms. For practical reasons, there is therefore the demand to emit very short
waves from few centimetres in the MDMs to few tenth of micron in the geodimeters. This demand,
however, is not reconciled with the need to emit waves with lengths in the order of metres to determine
the fine value of the distance or waves of some kilometres to determine the first approximate value.
These two demands are satisfied by resorting to the frequency modulation in the MDMs or to the
amplitude modulation in the geodimeters.
In the geodimeters, the wavelength of the carrier signal is constant and it assumes values of the order of a
few microns (satisfying the first demand), while the wavelength modulated assumes varying values from
a few metres to some kilometres (satisfying the second demand).
5.2.2 Electronic Distance Measuring of impulses
The operating principle of EDM, recently introduced into topographic surveying, is based on the measure
of the time taken by a bright impulse to go from the distance meter to the reflector and back.
M-13
81
The same principle is used, for instance, by a particular system for measuring satellite altimetry, termed
SLR (Satellite Laser Ranging), in which a Laser impulse is reflected back by an artificial reflecting
satellite. The evolution of electronic systems has enabled the employment of these methods in
topographical EDM, obtaining performances superior to those of phase EDM.
A diode light beam transmitting laser is excited for a short time interval. The exact measure of the time
“t” between the transmission of the impulse and the following receipt would be enough to determine the
distance:
v⋅t
d= (2.61)
2
However the measurement of the time is made with certain errors. A time interval of 10-8 seconds
(typical of a quartz clock) is enough for the bright impulse to cover 3 metres; this is not acceptable for an
EDM. It is therefore necessary for a refinement in the measurement of the time, obtained by determining
the fraction of the period of oscillation of the clock between the departure of the impulse and its receipt:
t = n ⋅ T + t A - tB (2.62)
where T is the period of the clock, n is the number of periods and therefore nT is the measurement of the
time directly produced by the clock; tA is the time between the transmission of the signal and the start of
the clock oscillation and tB is the time spent between the receipt of the signal to the completion of the
final clock oscillation. To determine these two fractions of time, the voltage with which the laser diode is
excited is gradually supplied in a linear manner; then, by determining the voltage VT which would be
used for a complete oscillation of the clock, the two fractions tA and tB can be calculated with a simple
proportion:
t A : VA = t B : VA = T : VT (2.63)
where VA and VB are the voltages respectively supplied to the heads of the diode in the time tA and tB.
In theory it would be enough for only one impulse to determine the distance; in practice thousands of
impulses are transmitted to increasing the precision. Some EDM systems transmit up to 2000 impulses
per second, employing 0.8 sec (1600 impulses) to achieve a standard error of 5mm + 1mm/km and 3 sec
(6000 impulses) to obtain a standard error of 3mm + 1mm/km.
The many advantages of this method in comparison to that of the measurement of phase are evident:
a. It requires less time to take the measurements; after a few impulses (few milliseconds) a
centimetric precision is obtained on the measurement of the distance, while the EDM of
phase generally requires a few whole seconds. The ability to very quickly take measurements
is useful when determining the distance of a moving point (and therefore in bathymetric
surveys);
b. The signal can also be returned with weak power, because a small voltage is sufficient to stop
the clock and complete the relevant time calculation. This allows notable increases in the
range of the distance meter for equivalent intensities of the transmitted signal. In terms of
power supply, the transmission of impulses is more economic than a continuous transmission
of the carrier signal (greater battery life);
M-13
82
c. It is possible to obtain EDM which do not need reflectors to produce a signal return. These
equipment have ranges strongly influenced by the quality and the colour of the reflecting
surface, they do not operate over ranges of more 200-300 metres and they can achieve
precisions of 5-10 mms. They are very useful for the measurement of distances of
inaccessible points;
d. The quality of the measurement is not heavily influenced by environmental factors
(temperature, pressure or humidity) as in EDM of phase measurement.
Besides these advantages, generally it is the higher cost of EDM of impulses which needs to be
considered; probably justifiable only in the case where it is necessary to frequently measure distances of
over 1 km.
5.2.3 Precision and range of EDM
Generally, EODMs, or geodimeters, use infrared waves, rarely waves included in the visible spectrum
(with wavelengths in the order of 1-5 micrometres), or laser waves; in this equipment the reflector is
passive, being made up of one or more three-squared prisms which reflect the signal parallel to the
incidental ray. Increasing the number of prisms of the reflector increases the corresponding the range of
the geodimeter, which can reach 4 or 5 kilometres.
The precision of EDM waves depends on numerous factors, presently it has reached comparable levels
with that obtainable with wires of INVAR.
An important element of EDM is comprised by the oscillator, on whose stability the precision of the
equipment depends. In fact, the frequency of the oscillator is a function of temperature; the law of
variation of frequency as temperature varies must be memorised in the EDM, in order to be able to apply
the appropriate corrections, which can reach 3-5 ppms for 20°C of temperature variation.
It is required to consider the atmospheric refraction which directly influences the wavelength of the
transmitted signals. The effect of refraction depends on the values of temperature and atmospheric
pressure which have to be inserted into the system, which then calculates, according to an empirical
formula, the corrections to be applied in ppm to the measured distance. In other cases the builders
provide some tables, through which the correction to apply to the distance can directly be determined,
knowing the values of temperature and pressure. It is useful to remember that, in the first approximation,
a correction of 1 ppm can derive from a variation of 1°C of temperature, of 3.5 hectopascals of
atmospheric pressure or of 25 hectopascals of the partial pressure of the humidity of the air.
The aging of the equipment causes a variation of the nominal rated frequency of the oscillator, which can
reach values of some ppms after 2-3 years of life. It is necessary, therefore, to have the system
periodically re-calibration.
Finally, for determining the distance it is necessary to consider the instrument constant, termed the prism
constant, because, generally the centre of reflecting surface of the prism is not coincident with the centre
of the reflector. Such a constant is created by the reflectors and needs to be memorized in the EDM for
every combination of prisms used.
As far as it affects the range of EDM, besides being a characteristic of this type of system, it also depends
on atmospheric conditions and on the number of prisms being used. As previously stated, with the same
power supply, the EDMs using impulses have greater ranges than those measuring by phase, they can
achieve, under optimal atmospheric conditions, distances of 15 kilometres.
M-13
83
It should be noted that atmospheric conditions are considered:
a. unfavourable: a lot of haze or intense sun with strong refraction;

b. mean: light haze or veiled sun
c. good: no haze and cloudy sky
It is evident therefore, that the nominal precision declared by the builders of EDM is achievable only if all
the factors which can influence the measurements are considered. In general phase EDM enables the
achievement, without particular acumen, precisions of the order of σ = 5mm + 5ppm
5.2.4 Total Stations
The collocating of an EDM and an electronic theodolite can be extremely productive, because it is
possible to integrate the data coming from the distance meter with the angular measurements obtained
with the theodolite. Thus, it is possible to immediately calculate other quantities, indirectly obtained,
such as horizontal distances or rectangular co-ordinates, etc.
The collocated theodolite-EDM is called a Total Station or integrated station, as it enables singularly to
obtain all the measurements for topographic surveying such as angles, distances, co-ordinates etc.
The surveyed data can be registered in a ‘field book’, but due to their digital nature, the data can be stored
on magnetic media or the solid state memory. Thus the possible transcription errors of the operator are
avoided and measurement operations are accelerated.
The inspirational principle of these systems is to automate the most repetitive operations of topographic
surveying such as angular and distance readings, data recording, the input of station details, etc.
5.3 Optical instruments
5.3.1 Marine sextant (Circle to reflection)
The circle to reflection is a tool specifically built for the measure of horizontal angles between two
objects. The precision of marine sextant in the measurement of angles varies from 20" to 10’.
It is a system of reflection and the measurement of the angles is based, as for the sextant, on the theory of
the optics of the double reflection of a bright ray, with the difference that, in the circle, prisms are
employed instead of mirrors.
The two prisms are set one sideways, the other higher and at the centre of a circular box provided with a
handle. The prism at the centre is mobile and has two fins which limit the bright rays picked up by the
prism to those which are reflected by the hypotenuse of the prism. The other prism is fixed and it is set at
such a height from the plane of the box to cover only the interior half of the field of the telescope.
The telescope is fixed in such a way that the direct images of the objects appears in the upper part of its
field and in the lower half for those reflected by the small prism. Inside the box a graduated circle is
contained, fixed to the large prism, therefore rotating with respect to an index marked on the box.
To allow the equipment to work correctly, it is necessary that the two fundamental operation conditions of
double reflection goniometers are respected, that is, in the case of prisms, they are exactly perpendicular
to the plane of the box of the instrument and, when the two hypotenuse are parallel, the index marks 0° on
the graduation vernier.
M-13
84
The large prism must not be able to move, except for rotation around its pivot; it is considered by
construction perpendicular to the box. The perpendicularity of the small prism to the box can be adjusted
by a screw. Set the vernier to 0°, if a distant object is observed through the telescope and the two parts of
the image are seen to perfectly lined up vertically, the direct one above and the reflected one below, it
indicates that the tool is perfectly rectified.
The parallelism between the hypotenuses of the prisms can be corrected with a special screw which
makes the small prism rotate around a normal axis to the plane of the box.
5.3.2 Theodolites
The theodolite is an instrument which measures azimuth angles, via a graduated horizontal circle, and
zenithal angles, via a graduated vertical circle.
Precision of theodolites in the measurement of angles varies from 0.1" to 10"; the tacheometris (or
tachymetris) are differentiated from theodolites due to their lower obtainable precisions, from 10" to 10',
in angular measurements.
In a theodolite three axes can be identified:
a. the primary axis, around which the alidade rotates;

b. the secondary axis, around which the telescope rotates;
c. the axis of collimation of the telescope.
The principal parts of a theodolite are:
a. the base (or tribrach), provided with a pedestal and three adjusting screws (levelling screws)
on the basal plate which is the lowest part of the theodolite connected to the head of the
tripod (or stand and legs), so as to be able, within certain limits, to centre the instrument over
the reference mark. The lower spirit level or circular level (also termed universal level or
bull’s eye level) and the optic lead are anchored to it.
b. the alidade is a generally U-shaped frame, which can rotate around the vertical axis passing
through the centre of the instrument (primary axis) and contains the engraved horizontal
circle reading index. An upper spirit level (termed spirit bubble or sensitive bubble) is
anchored to it to make the primary axis vertical and to set the origin of the zenith angles to
the zenith, residual errors excepted.
c. the graduated horizontal circle, situated above the pedestal and under the alidade.
d. the telescope, hinged to the alidade so that its axis of collimation is perpendicular to its axis
of rotation. The telescope has a magnification from 28 to 45 times, thus increasing the
precision of the measurements.
e. the vertical circle, rigidly connected to the telescope, for reading of the zenithal angles
The theodolite can be of two types, depending on the system of lock used for the horizontal circle:
repeating and reiterating.
M-13
85
a. The repeating theodolites (fig. 2.20) are those which allow the fixing of the horizontal
circle both to the plinth and to the alidade through two separate screws. When both the
locking screws are operating, the horizontal circle is fixed both to the plinth and to the
alidade, so that the instrument cannot rotate around the primary axis.
b. In the reiterating theodolites (fig. 2.20), the horizontal circle remains independent from
the plinth and from the alidade; it can rotate with the plinth through a special screw,
usually protected against accidental manoeuvres. The alidade is locked to the plinth
through a locking screw, together with a screw for minor movements.
Fig. 2.20 “Theodolites”
Before obtaining any angular measurements, it is essential to verify that between the principal axes
(primary, secondary and of coincidence) and other parts of the instrument some conditions of precision
are achieved. Some of these are directly verified by the instrument builder, conditions of construction,
and if the instrument is used with care, they can always be considered unaltered and therefore satisfied.
Some conditions, termed conditions of rectification, must be directly verified by the operator before
beginning every measurement session. In particular one consists of establishing the verticality of the
primary axis; this is achieved by using the spirit level, which is more sensitive than the circular one used
for precisely centring the principal axis of the instrument over the reference mark. To use the spirit level
the alidade has to be rotated until the level is inline with the direction of two adjusting screws and, using
them, the spirit bubble has to be centred. The level is correct, when by rotating the alidade 180° the spirit
bubble remains centred; if not it will be necessary to use the rectification screw and the two adjusting
screws. Final stage for correct levelling, the instrument is rotated 90° and using the third adjusting screw
to centre the spirit bubble.
The other adjustment, normally only required when observers change, is to ensure that the telescope is
correctly focused. This is achieved using the focusing ring on the telescope to ensure the reticle (or
reticule) lines appear clear and sharp.
M-13
86
5.3.3 Levelling instruments (Levels) and Stadia
The levelling instrument (or level) is an instrument which allows the creation of an axis of horizontal
collimation and it is used in geometric levelling. Modern levels are divided into:
a. Fixed Levels and Self-aligning Levels;

b. Digital Levels;
c. Laser Levels.
Having chosen the type of level, and thus defined the mechanism for reading, it is necessary to choose a
stadia rod or a levelling rod or staff, whose principle of graduation connects it to the level. Levels with
fixed or tilting telescopes have been made obsolete by modern digital and laser levels.
5.3.3.1 Fixed Telescope Level (Dumpy Level)
It consists of a telescope which forms a single unit with the pivot of rotation and with its base, similar to
that of the theodolite. A spirit level is fixed to the telescope which allows the instrument to be levelled in
position, in a similar fashion to a theodolite. Once the spirit level is centred in the two orthogonal
directions, the level can be employed for determining the difference of elevation in any direction.
A condition periodically checked, is that the axis of the spirit level is parallel to the axis of collimation.
To check the instrument, all that is required is to measure an already known difference of elevation
between two points with the level in the middle and to move the reticle of the telescope with the special
screw until the reading on the stadia is correct.
5.3.3.2 Fixed Telescope Level with Elevation Screw (Dumpy Level)
In these levels the telescope is not rigidly connected to the pivot of rotation but through a crossroad
hinged at one end and connected at the other by a screw, called the elevation screw (or micrometer
screw). The elevation screw allows the telescope to rotate, through a very small vertical angle; this
enables a horizontal the line of sight to be achieved even if the primary axis is not vertical. These levels
have a spherical level attached to the base, which, when centred, approximately makes the primary axis
vertical. For each sight, it is necessary to use the elevation screw until the spirit level attached to the
telescope is centred, thus making the axis of collimation horizontal.
5.3.3.3 Rotating Telescope Level (Y – Level)
In these levels the telescope can rotate through a vertical angle (180°) inside a muff connected solidly to
the pivot of rotation. Attached to the telescope is a reversing spirit level with a double bend, which
allows it to work even if it is turned upside-down. In these instruments there are therefore two axis of the
level: the axis of rotation of the telescope (which coincides with the axis of the muff) and the axis of
collimation. In the assumption that the two axes of the levels are parallel and that the axis of the muff
coincides with the axis of collimation, two readings are made on the stadia, corresponding to the two
extreme positions which the telescope can assume, each time centring the spirit level with the elevation
screw.
Using the arithmetic average of the two readings, any error between the axis of the level and the axis of
collimation is compensated, because the error is of opposite sign in the two readings obtained.
M-13
87
5.3.3.4 Self-aligning Level
In these instruments the axis of collimation is automatically made horizontal by an internal system,
independently from the verticality of the primary axis. Since such systems, termed compensators, work
within certain limits of rotation of the telescope, of the order of 10', the self-aligning levels are fitted with
a circular level, which once centred, guarantees the correct operation of the instrument. Compensators,
the actual design of which is different for each manufacturer, normally constitute a sensitive prism
element suspended on a pendulum which uses the principle that the strength of gravity will create a
horizontal line of sight.
5.3.3.5 Digital Level
These levels are similar to self-aligning levels but the reading on the levelling rod is made automatically,
though it is possible for the traditional optic reading, in case of malfunction of the electronic parts or
exhaustion of the batteries.
The stadia used with this type of levels are specific; on one side they have a graduation as with normal
stadia, on the other side they have bar code graduations. The image of the bar code from the levelling rod
is separately transmitted to the ocular sight to allow reading of the levelling rod and to an electronic
survey system. The digital signal is decoded through a microprocessor which is able to produce, besides
the difference of elevation, the horizontal distance between the two points.
The advantages introduced by these systems come from the ability to automatically record the survey
data, with a considerable saving in time and with the total elimination of blunders during transcription.
Correct operation is only guaranteed under good light conditions, that is measurements are performed in
the open air. The precision of these levels is of 0.1 mm for the difference of elevations and of 1 cm for
the distances.
5.3.3.6 Laser Level
These levels use the transmission of a laser beam which matches the line of sight of the telescope. Some
of these instruments, which are normally self-aligning levels, do not require operator intervention. Once
the equipment has been placed at the station with the aid of a circular level, a motor makes the laser beam
continuously rotate, through a switch prism; in this way only one operator is required to perform levelling
within a field of 200-300 m of the ray.
The levelling rods used for these levels have a sensor, decimetres in length, which can move on the stadia.
When the laser beam hits the sensor, the value corresponding to the ray can be read and automatically
recorded.
The precision of the measurements can be less than a millimetre, the system is ideal for the radial
levelling.
6. POSITIONING METHODS (TECHNIQUES OF POSITIONING)
6.1 GNSS (GPS)
6.1.1 Description of Global Positioning System (GPS)
The GPS positioning system is based on the receipt of radio signals sent from an artificial satellite
constellation in orbit around the earth, it is a real-time, all-weather, 24-hour, worldwide, 3-dimensional
M-13
88
absolute satellite-based positioning system. The complete name of the system is NAVSTAR GPS which
means NAVigation Satellite Timing And Ranging Global Positioning System. The system, created by the
Department of the Defence in the United States, is currently managed in collaboration with the
Department of the Commerce and has been projected to allow at every moment in every part of the world
the three-dimensional positioning of objects, including whilst moving.
The system is divided into:
a. The spatial segment: is formed by 24 satellites in near circular orbit around the Earth at a
height of about 20,200 kms. The satellites are distributed in groups of 4 about 6 circular
orbits tilted 55° to the equatorial plane with a revolution period of about 12 hours. This
constellation distribution ensures the visibility of at least 4 satellites (often 6 to 8) at all times
and places with an elevation above 15° degrees from the horizon, which is fundamental for
the positioning.
The satellites have the followings functions:
• To transmit information to users through a radio signal;

• To maintain an accurate reference time due to the high degree of accuracy (from 10-12 to
10-14 sec) of the caesium and rubidium atomic clocks on board;
• To receive and to store information from the control segment;
• To make corrections to orbits.
The satellites have been launched in different epochs, starting in 1978, in blocks which
replaced earlier models with more advance ones.
b. Control segment: comprises 5 monitoring stations and an additional sixth at Sunnyvale,

USA, where a copy of all the selected data and all the attached operations are preserved.
Among the five stations, all of which are provided with meteorological stations for the
evaluation of the troposphere affects on the radio signals sent by satellites, three stations
(Ascension, Diego Garcia and Kwajalein) have the ability to send messages to the satellites
and one (Colorado Springs, USA) is the Master station, where the necessary calculations for
the determination of the new orbits are performed. In summary the tasks of the control
segment are:
• To continuously track the satellites and to process the received data for the calculation of
the timing-space position (Ephemeris);
• To check the general state of the system, in particular the satellite clocks;
• To implement orbit corrections;
• To upload new data to the satellites, including the forecast Ephemeris for the next 12 or
24 hours, which are then transmitted to users.
c. The user segment: is made up of users equipped with receivers with GPS antennas. These
are passive systems in that they are able to acquire data without emitting some signal.
Various types of receivers exist depending on the strategy used to analyze the received signal
and the required positional accuracy.
M-13
89
d. The signal structure: Every satellite continually emits electromagnetic waves on carefully
chosen frequencies to a very small sector on the earth’s surface and is thus relatively
sheltered from interference. These carrier waves transport the information to the user through
code modulation. The onboard clocks produce a primary frequency f0 = 10.23 MHz; from
this primary frequency the three fundamental parts of the GPS signal are precisely originated:
• Carrying Component
It is made up of two sinusoidal waves called L1 and L2 respectively of frequency 154 x
f0 = 1575.42MHz (λL1≅19 cm) and 120 x f0 = 1227.60 MHz (λL2 ≅24 cm).
• Impulsive Component
It comprises two codes called Coarse Acquisition (C/A) and Precision (P), the former
only modulates the L1 carrier frequency and the later both the L1 and the L2.
• Such codes are square waves formed by transitions of values +1 and –1 produced by a
simple algorithm, which has as a characteristic the statistic balancing of positive and
negative values; the codes are called "pseudo accidental" or PRN (Pseudo Random
Noise). The C/A code frequency is 1.023 MHz (C/A≅300m), the P code has a frequency
that is 1 x f0 = 10.23 MHz (P≅30 m). The C/A code is available for civil use while the
P code is reserved to military use and other authorized users. The DoD USA have
reserve the right to disguise the P code by encryption and using the so-called Anti-
Spoofing (A–S) procedure. The encrypted P code is called Y-code.
• Message Component
It is composed of the navigation D message which has a frequency f0/204800 = 50 Hz. It
contains the ephemeris (or almanac) details of the satellites, information on their health
and the onboard clocks.
6.1.2 Principles of positioning
GPS positioning uses the technique of Spatial Measurement Intersection. The geodetic reference system
(Datum) exploited is called World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84), which is created from a clockwise
Cartesian axis rotation with the origin at the earth’s centre of mass, with which the geocentric ellipsoid
WGS84 is associated. If the satellite co-ordinates in this reference system are known, the unknown co-
ordinates of a point are connected to the known co-ordinates of the observed satellites through the
measurement of a sufficient number of distances between the satellites and the centre of phase of an
antenna connected to the receiver at the required position. Essentially there are three principles of
positioning:
a. Absolute positioning (or normal);

b. Relative positioning;
c. Differential positioning.
6.1.2.1 Absolute positioning
The aim of this method of positioning is the determination of positional co-ordinates in the WGS84
global reference system. This is achieved by using the signal’s impulsive component (C/A code or P code
if available) or to analyze the two carrier phases L1 and L2.
M-13
90
In the first case, the satellite-receiver distances are called ‘pseudo-ranges’ and they are calculated
according to the flight time which is the time the signal takes to reach the receiver from the satellite. This
time is measured by the receiver through correlations between the received signal and a copy produced by
the receiver; the copy signal in the receiver is shifted in order to line it up with the satellite signal. The
calculated time difference is influenced by the asynchronous error between the satellite and receiver
clocks, in addition to the drift of the receiver clock, which is less accurate than the atomic clocks of the
satellites.
These factors cannot be ignored in the measurement of flight time; it is for this reason that to the 3 clock
unknown quantities of point position (transformable Cartesian x, y, z in ϕ , λ and height on the ellipsoid
WGS84) it adds a fourth category, which identifies the receiver clock errors. From this it follows that
there is a requirement to simultaneously observe a least four satellites to obtain an absolute position in
real time.
In the second case the phase of the two carrier frequencies is analyzed and the satellite-receiver distance
can be obtained by comparing the phase of the carrier signal at the moment of reception with the phase of
the signal at the moment of transmission. In this case an additional unknown quantity for every observed
satellite is introduced; it is the Initial Integer Ambiguity which is the integer of cycles the signal has
traversed from the satellite to the receiver at the beginning measurement. Thus to every new observed
satellite a corresponding new Ambiguity is created, due to the different distances. As a result, absolute
positioning in real time with phase measurements is only possible if the Ambiguities of the satellites used
for positioning are known; the procedure for this determination is called initialisation.
6.1.2.2 Relative positioning
The aim of relative positioning is the determination of the base-line vector or of the vector components
which ties the two positions on which temporarily the two receivers are located. If the absolute co-
ordinates of one of the two points are known, adding the components of the base-line vector, the absolute
co-ordinates of the second position can be obtained. Such positioning can be achieved through
measurements of code or phase, although in practise only phase measurement is used. A phase
observation equation can be written for every receiver from which a satellite is observed at a given
moment. Observing the same satellite at the same moment from two different receivers at the ends of the
base-line and then subtracting one from the other produces two equations of phase, an equation to the
simple differences. Inserting into the observation another satellite, and adding the difference between the
two equations to the simple differences, an equation to the double differences is created. At the end of
these two operations the result is the elimination of the clock errors of the two satellites. At this point the
unknown quantities to be determined are the components of the base-line vector and the sum of the four
initial ambiguities of the two satellites (considered as only an integer value). If the signal is interrupted
the ambiguities change and a new initialisation is required. Finally the possible interruptions of the signal
are separated through the difference between two equations of the double differences (termed equation to
the triple differences) and establishing the continuity, the unknown Ambiguity quantity is eliminated.
6.1.2.3 Differential positioning
Differential positioning is similar to absolute positioning but has corrections for pseudo-range in real time
or in delayed time, transmitted or stored by receivers set on points of known absolute co-ordinates. The
remote receiver applies, in real time or in delayed time, the corrections to the measurements of pseudo-
range or phase effected and then calculates the correct absolute position, improving the accuracy of the
co-ordinates.
M-13
91
6.1.3 Performances of the system and sources of error
In relationship to the different positioning principles, they are classified by the different degrees of
accuracy:
a. Absolute (SPS) with measurements of code C/A on L1: 10 to 30 metres

b. Absolute (PPS) with measurements of code P (Y) on L1/L2: 5 to 15 metres
c. Relative with measurements of static phase: 10-8 to 10-6 of the
base-line
d. Relative with measurements of phase (RTK): decimetre
e. Differential with code phase measurements (DGPS): few metres
f. Differential with carrier phase measurements (RTK DGPS): few centimetres
The elements (error sources) which have the most influence on system performance are:
a. Clock errors of the satellites and the receivers (off-set and drift);
b. Orbit errors (imperfections in the Ephemeris data);
c. Delays during atmosphere signal passage because of ionosphere and troposphere refraction,
whose affects on the signal are considerable due to the use of double frequency receivers;
d. Tropospheric error. Humidity is included in this error. Humidity can delay a time signal by
up to approximately 3 m. Satellites low on the horizon will be transmitting signals across the
surface of the earth through the troposphere; whilst those directly overhead will transmit
through much less of the troposphere. Masking the horizon angle to 15° can minimise the
tropospheric error. If this blocks too many satellites, a compromise down to 10° may be
necessary. Manufacturers model the tropospheric delay in software; tests have determined
that these tropospheric models work reasonably well.
e. Ionospheric error. Sun-spots and other electromagnetic phenomenon cause errors in GPS
range measurements of up to 30 m during the day and as high as 6 m at night. The errors are
not predictable but can be estimated. The ionospheric error is assumed to be the same at the
reference receiver as at the vessel receiver. This assumption is sound for GPS networks
where the stations are separated by a few nautical miles. Ionospheric models have been
implemented for dual frequency receivers.
f. Multi-path. Multi-path is a reception of a reflected signal in lieu of a direct signal. The

reflection can occur below or above the antenna. Multi-path magnitude is less over water
than over land, but it is still present and always changing. The placement of the GPS receiver
antenna should avoid areas where multi-path is more likely to occur (i.e. rock outcrops, metal
roofs, commercial roof-mounted heating/air conditioning, buildings, cars, ships, etc.).
Increasing the height of the antenna is one method of reducing multi-path at a reference
station. The multi-path occurrence on a satellite range can last several minutes. Masking out
satellite signals from the horizon up to 15° will also reduce multi-path.
g. Geometric configuration of satellites used for positioning, given by GDOP (Geometrical

Dilution of Precision). The GDOP is divided for this purpose into some indices (PDOP and
TDOP) which have been introduced to establish a degree of quality control. The most
general is called PDOP (Position Dilution of Precision), inversely proportional to the
‘goodness’ of the configuration, which is divided into two components for control purposes:
M-13
92
the vertical or VDOP (Vertical Dilution of Precision) and the commonly used horizontal or
HDOP (Horizontal Dilution of Precision); occasionally the ratio HDOP/PDOP is considered
(for horizontal control see Chapter 7).
h. Voluntary errors, for reducing the pseudo-range measurement performance on the position
data of satellites, can be introduced at the discretion of the system managers. Such
procedures, called Selective Availability (S/A), produced an uncertainty in the positioning
through the calculation of pseudo-range in the order of a 100 metres, this was removed 1st
May 2000. Differential operation could eliminate S/A. Even with S/A set to zero, DGPS is
still required for most hydrographic surveying applications.
6.1.4 GPS tracking and signal acquisition techniques
6.1.4.1 Tracking Techniques
Two general modes are basically used to determine the distance, or range, between a NAVSTAR GPS
satellite and a ground-based receiver antenna. These measurements are made by satellite signal phase
comparison techniques. The carrier frequency phase or the phase of a digital code modulated on the
carrier phase may be tracked to resolve the distance between the satellite and the receiver. The resultant
positional accuracy is dependent on the tracking method used.
These two-phase tracking techniques are:
• Carrier phase tracking;

• Code phase tracking.
The GPS satellites actually broadcast on two carrier frequencies: L1 at 1575.42 MHz (19-cm wavelength)
and L2 at 1227.60 MHz (24-cm wavelength). Modulated on these frequencies are the Coarse Acquisition
(C/A) (300-m wavelength) and the Precise (P) codes (30-m wavelength). In addition, a 50-bps satellite
navigation message containing the satellite ephemeris and health status of each satellite is transmitted.
The C/A and P codes are both present on the L1 frequency. Only the P code is present on the L2
frequency. The higher frequency of the carrier signal (L-Band) has a wavelength of 19 and 24 cm from
which a distance can be resolved through post-processing software to approximately 2 mm. The
modulating code has a wavelength of 300 m and will only yield distances accurate to about 1 m. Both of
these tracking methods have application in hydrographic and conventional surveying.
6.1.4.2 Signal Acquisition Techniques
The procedures of acquisition have characteristics and different accuracies; they relate to different
approaches of signal handling. These are described as:
a. Stand-Alone: single point absolute position with pseudo-range in the WGS84 geodetic
reference system. The absolute accuracy, to the 95% of level of confidence, is between 10
and 30 meters for SPS (Standard Positioning Service) and between 5 and 15 for PPS (Precise
Positioning Service). The applications are only navigational.
b. Differential (DGPS): the differential corrections, calculated in a reference station of known

position, are applied to the absolute position generated by a stand-alone receiver. These
corrections of code or phase, as previously described, can be transmitted by radio or cellular
phone, meeting the RTCM protocol, and applied in real time, or stored in the reference
M-13
93
station and applied during the post processing with suitable software. The ranges and the
accuracies are described in the table below:
Range Correction Distance among

Accuracy
tracking Stations
Code phase Some hundred km Few metres
Carrier phase About ten km Few centimetres
c. Relative: the co-ordinates of the base-line vector ends, which connect the positions
occupied by the stations, have to be determined. The calculation is achieved by post
processing using the method of the double differences, correcting the data acquired on the
phase of GPS signal in the base and mobile receiver. The principal methods are:
Technique Application
Static Reference frame of high accuracy
Rapid Static Reference frame with less accuracy
Stop and go Kinematic Fiducial points, survey in detail
Continue Kinematic Trajectories, continuous monitoring
The time of acquisition and the sampling interval (termed rate) are the discriminators in the relative
methods. The rate has to be a good compromise between the demand of measurements and the size of the
file to process them. For example, for static applications with long acquisition periods, it is common to
sample with a time interval of 15 or 30 seconds; for kinematic applications it is necessary to reduce this
interval, often down to 1 second. This value represents the sampling limit interval in many receivers;
currently receivers are able to make measurements with a frequency of 20Hz. Methods, techniques of
acquisition and fields of use are summarized in the table below:
Method Time of measure Length bases Accuracy Rate (per Notes

sec)
Static >1/2 hour doubles frequency
1 hour 10 kms 10-6 to 10-8 15-60 if with bases (20
from 3 to 4 hours 20/30 kms (of baseline kms
varying >100 kms length)
Rapid Static 20-30 min(L1s) 6-8 <10-15 kms 10-6 5-15 necessity for good
mins (L2) (of baseline satellite
length) configuration
Stop and go <1min some kms centimetric 1-5 needs continuous
Kinematic <10 kms contact with
satellites
Initialisation:
- up to 30 mins: L1
- 5/6 mins: L1 + L2
- On the Fly
(OTF):L1+L2
Continuous Continuous Some kms centimetric 1-5 (20Hz) as above for the
Kinematic stop and go
M-13
94
6.1.5 DGPS
The GPS differential positioning (Differential GPS = DGPS) it is a technique in which two or more
receivers are used; one on a station of a geodetic or topographic reference frame (Reference Station) and
one (Rover Station) which occupies the new points to be determined in a survey vector (standing or in
movement). The reference station calculates the Pseudo-Range Corrections (PRC) and their variations in
time (RRC = Range Rate Correction). Both corrections can be transmitted in real time to the remote
receiver of the rover station or they can be stored in the receiver of the reference station to be applied
during the post-processing procedure.
When the procedure is performed in real time, a connection between the two stations (reference-rover) is
created by radio modem or telephone modem.
In any case, the remote receiver (in real time) or the receiver/PC with post-processing software (in
delayed time) apply the corrections to the measurements of pseudo-ranges and calculate the single point
positions with these corrected observations.
The differential positioning can be applied to the range of code or phase.
6.1.5.1 DGPS with measures of code:
From a time series of PRC corrections its RRC variation in time can be quantified by numerical
interpolation.
The range code correction, to an arbitrary epoch ‘t’, can be approximated with the following:
PRC satel
t = PRC satel
t0 + RRC satel
t0 ⋅ (t − t 0 ) (2.64)
where the term (t - t0), called latency, is the determinant for the precision of positioning. This is nothing
other than the time difference between the calculation of correction in the reference station receiver and
its application (times of transmission, calculation etc) in the rover station receiver.
Applying such corrections of range, the satellite clock errors disappear from the range measurement
equations. The possible disturbing effect, caused by a deliberate degrading of clocks and orbits data can
be virtually eliminated. Similarly other troubling affects such as the ionospheric and tropospheric
refraction.
Therefore the remote receiver position is calculated with the corrected pseudo-ranges of code. This
correction can be transmitted or stored with a RTCM standard protocol and the technique is named
RTCM Differential GPS.
The pseudo-range corrections can be transmitted to the GPS receiver by:
• Reference Station GPS receiver situated temporarily at a horizontal control point within the
survey area or from a permanent station, with a modem by radiofrequencies (UHF/VHF/HF)
or by telephone techniques (GSM/Satellite);
• Commercial fee-for-service Wide-Area Differential GPS system, using satellite broadcast
techniques to deliver accurate GPS correctors, for instance Wide Area OmniSTAR system
(FUGRO group) and LandStar (THALES group) systems;
M-13
95
• Free service by a DGPS MSK Radiobeacon Navigation Service (DGPS Beacon IALA
System);
• Free service by world Wide Area Augmentation Systems (FAA WAAS, EGNOS,
GPS/GLONASS, MSAS) Satellite Service.
Such techniques provided suitable results for the quick geo-referencing of significant details on the
ground.
6.1.5.2 DGPS with measures of phase:
In this technique the satellite clock errors and the errors associated with the ionospheric and tropospheric
refraction are eliminated. The correction of range of phase can be transmitted in real time by the
reference station receiver to the rover station receiver through the RTCM protocol or through proper
format of the receiver manufactures. DGPS with measurement of phase is used for kinematic applications
of precision in real time: such techniques are termed RTK (Real Time Kinematic). The aim is for the
time of latency to be removed or in practice much reduced (a few milliseconds).
6.1.6 RTK
The Real Time Kinematic (RTK) positioning is based on the use of at least of two GPS receivers, one as a
reference station and one or more mobile receivers (rover stations). The receiver at the reference station
performs measurements for the satellites in sight and transmits the corrections to the mobile receivers. At
the same time the rover stations also perform measurements on the same satellites whilst processing the
data received from the reference station; each rover then evaluates its position relatively to the reference
station. Typically the reference and rover receivers acquire measurements every second, producing
solutions of position with the same frequency.
Using receivers in the RTK mode, the measurements generated on the signal GPS carrier phase are
utilised to reach centimetric accuracies.
The automatic initialisation, called OTF (On The Fly), is a common characteristic of the receivers capable
of the RTK mode, for which both the reference and the rovers require at least five common satellites in
sight simultaneously. Such a process consists of resolving the phase ambiguity, which is present in the
measurement of range by phase and it removes the restrictions on the movement of the rover receivers
during the process of initialisation, which lasts no more than few minutes. Initially the rover receiver
produces a float solution or FLT with metric accuracy (the phase ambiguity is not fixed). When the
initialisation is completed, the solution becomes a FIX type and the accuracy becomes centimetric.
The number of FIX type positions per second, produced by the RTK system (Update Rate), defines with
what accuracy the route of a mobile receiver (rover) can be represented. The Update Rate is measured in
Hertz and it can actually reach values of 20 Hz for some modern receivers.
Time of latency or Latency is the time period between the measurements affected by the receivers
(reference and rovers) and the visualisation of the position in the rover receivers (including times of
measurement, formatting and data transmission from the reference to the rover and FIX solution
calculation); this parameter is very important for mobile vehicle guidance.
A vehicle which travels at 25 km/hr covers for example around 7 metres per second. For this the latency
must be less than 1/7 (= 0.14) of a second to obtain positions with an accuracy of less than one metre.
M-13
96
The data transmission from the reference station, positioned within the survey area or from a permanent
station, to the rover by radio modem or GSM modem, has been standardised in accordance with an
international protocol named RTCM (Radio Technical Commission for Maritime service). Messages in
this format need a transmission rate of at least 4800 bauds, other standards which support transmissions
also exist at slower rates of 2400 bauds (Es. CMR, Compact Measurement Record).
6.1.6.1 RTK Positioning mode
The most common GPS receivers with RTK ability have four principal positioning modes:
a. Synchronised RTK (1Hz): is the technique often used for reaching centimetric accuracies
between a reference station receiver and a mobile receiver. Typically the update rate is 1 Hz.
The latency of the synchronised positions (FIX) is determined in large part by the data
transmission, with a transmission at 4800 bauds it achieves around the one second. The RTK
synchronised solution produces the highest possible accuracy for RTK modes and adapts
itself well to dynamic applications.
b. Fast Synchronised RTK (5 or 10 Hz): has the same latency and accuracy of the above mode,
but the positioning solutions are produced 5 to 10 times each second. Satisfactory results are
obtained when it is connected at least to 9600 bauds.
c. Low Latency RTK: allows centimetric accuracies (a little inferior to the synchronised RTK
positioning mode) almost instantly due to the reduction of the latency to about 20
milliseconds, which allows 20 FIX solutions each second. The technique, exploited for the
drastically decreased latency, bases itself on the data phase forecast of the reference station,
which generally have a continuous solution with variations independent of signal losses,
satellite motion, clock running and atmospheric delay. Thus the errors in prediction of phase
measurements of the reference station from the mobile station are influenced mainly by
instability in the receiver clocks and from unexpected variations in satellite orbits.
d. Moving RTK Base-Line: different from the majority of the RTK applications, in which the
reference station is fixed at a point of known co-ordinates, this technique uses pairs of
receivers (reference and rover) both moving. This mode is dependant on the orientation
determination of a mobile in which the two RTK receivers are positioned at the two
extremities of the base-line (i.e. along the keel axis of a boat). The reference station receiver
transmits the effected measurements to the rover, which calculates a RTK solution
synchronised (base-line with orientation and length) at 1 or 5 or 10 Hz, with centimetric
accuracy. The absolute positioning of the reference station, and therefore also of the rover
station, has an accuracy equivalent to that of the absolute positioning with measurements of
code (some about ten meters). The reference-rover distance should not be greater than 1 km
to obtain good results.
6.1.7 Treatment of the data
6.1.7.1 Computational process in the Relative GPS positioning
The Relative GPS positioning is performed according to various phases in which all the differential
quantities which have been analyzed are used. It usually starts from an approximate solution which is
improved by the various processes.
M-13
97
In all the processing programs of GPS data are the basic phases of preliminary treatment to search for the
cycle slips and to find anomalous data associated with coarse errors. A good preliminary treatment of the
data is the basis of a good final solution. A GPS survey can be described in a number of ways; it can be
performed with two or more receivers, accorded more sessions and days of measurement.
The most common approach (single base) involves single independent bases without considering their
correlations. Such a strategy is exploited by the majority of the processing programs, because it produces
good results aligned to a greater simplicity. As in all computational programs, with a linear approach to
least squares, it is necessary to depart from approximate values. These are improved step by step by the
processing. The principal phases of the treatment are:
a. Solution single point with measures of code:

The approximate solution is deduced with pseudo-ranges on the C/A code
(Coarse/Acquisition or Clear/Access) or P code (Precise or Protected) if available.
b. Net determination through single differences of phase:

It is necessary to decide which independent base-lines are to be considered in the process. To
achieve this it is necessary to create the single differences between the data files
corresponding to the points of stations between which it is decided to calculate the base-lines.
c. Treatment of data with the equations to the triple differences (solution TRP):
Starting from the approximate co-ordinates previously produced, it is essential to determine
the components (Δx, Δy, Δz)TRP of the base-line vector in the WGS84 geocentric reference
system, without necessarily having knowledge of the phase ambiguity. The solutions have
some disadvantages, such as a sequential propagation of errors from the three processes of
differentiation. As an approximate value this result, which does not represent the optimal
one, will be inserted into a further computational process to the double differences and
essentially it is useful for appraising the cycle slips which, when present, cause discontinuity
in the calculation of the base-line components.
d. Expansion to the double differences and solution with no fixed ambiguity (solution FLT):
Commencing with the station position, deduced with the third differences, the components
(Δx, Δy, Δz)FLT of the base-line vector are determinate again via iterative process, together
with the values of the phase ambiguities relative to the various combinations of two satellites
and two receivers. The combinations of the phase ambiguities are the only unknowns.
e. Fixing of the ambiguities to an integer value:

The values of the phase ambiguities when determined are generally not integers, they must be
fixed therefore to the nearest integer value. To do this the computational software inspects
the standard deviations of the ambiguity parameters, verifying that they are equal to small
fractions of a cycle. The correct fixing of the ambiguity is indicated by the RATIO quality
factor. Its value has to be greater than certain limits in relationship to the length of the
measured base-lines.
f. Expansion to the double differences and solution with fixed ambiguity (FIX):
The components (Δx, Δy, Δz)FIX of the base-line vector are determined again, with knowledge
of the term containing the phase ambiguities, previously fixed to an integer value. Therefore
the components Δx, Δy and Δz of the vector, connecting the positions on which the two
receivers are set, are the only unknowns to be solved from the equation to the double
differences.
M-13
98
This last passage normally represents the final result of the computational process; the resolution of the
system of equations to the double differences gives the final solution of the base-line vector with
ambiguity fixed to the integer value (FIX Solutions).
6.1.7.2 Statistic test on the quality of the elaboration
The correctness of the result of the calculation of a base-line can be valued according to statistic test; the
principal ones are:
a. Test of the Ratio: it is the ratio between the two smaller values of Variance (σ2), calculated
from different groups of fixed integers; it is of value if the phase ambiguities have been fixed
correctly. The calculation process generally separates more integer values of phase
ambiguity, to be used in the FIX solution. All the solutions are calculated with the probable
values of the ambiguities and the relative value of Variance of the unity of weight. Ratio is
the ratio between the lowest second variance and the best (lower) in absolute terms. An
elevated ratio means that between the two solutions there is considerable difference or
perhaps improvement; decrease of the value of variance is an indication of correct fixing of
the integer values. A value of Ratio >1.5 for static measurements and Ratio >3 for kinematic
measurements is considered acceptable.
b. Test on the Variance of the unity of weight: The variance of the unity of weight, at the start
fixed (also called variance of reference), has to be similar to the estimated value and, under
normal conditions, to be equal to 1. The procedure consists of calculating the variance of
threshold through a test with degrees of freedom equal to the redundancy. Elevated values of
the estimated variance can highlight the presence of noise in the signal related to obstacles or
satellites near to the horizon, local multiple reflections (multi-path), no calculation for
tropospheric or ionospheric affects or incorrect calculation of the integer phase ambiguities.
6.2 Electromagnetic
The characteristics that establish the performances of a system of electronic navigation are:
a. The range which is the maximum distance from the stations at which it can usefully be
employed. Being mainly tied to the radiated power and the sensitivity of the receiver, which
compose a specific technical problem, faced by the manufacture.
b. Precision25 and Accuracy26 with which the system generates the position of the ship, which is
related to factors which should be appreciated during the employment, with the aim of
knowing the reliability of the positions.
The performances of a system, in relation to the accuracy, makes reference to two particular indices of
output:
25
“The degree of refinement of a value” (IHO S32 – fifth edition 1994, #. 3987)
26
“The extent to which a measured or enumerated value agrees with the assumed or accepted value” or “the degree of
conformance with the correct value” (IHO S32 – fifth edition 1994, # 21 and # 3987)
M-13
99
a. Repeatability or Repeatable Accuracy27: is a measure of the capability of the system to

repeatedly return the mobile to the same position. It is influenced by the accidental errors of
the measurement (due to the operators, to the instruments and to anomalies of propagation of
the EM waves) and the geometry of the system (the angle of intersection between the
individual LOPs).
b. Forecast ability: it is a measure of the capability of the electronic navigation system to

minimise the size of the existing difference between the measurements and the estimate of
positions produced from the base of calculations, having fixed a model of propagation and the
geometry of the system. In the field of medium and high frequencies, the predictions for the
electromagnetic propagation for the purpose of positioning are irrelevant; it is present with all
of its complications in long range systems, and thus in low frequencies.
6.2.1 Accuracy in the position determination
When the accuracy of a navigation system is established, it is appropriate to specify the degree of
reliability which can be assigned to such a value. Although the distribution of the errors is more often
elliptic than circular, it is simpler to quote only one parameter, generated from the radius of a circle
centred on the determined point.
The mariner has the percentage value (x percent) of probability of being in such a circle. With the
objective of data exchangeability, it is important to clarify which statistical method was used in the
determination of the performance and also include the degree of reliability (or level of confidence),
expressed as the percentage of the tests which fell in a circle of determined radius.
For bi-dimensional measurements (in the horizontal co-ordinates x and y), the parameters generally have
two values:
a. Circular Error Probable (CEP): radius of a circle within which there is about a 50%
probability of finding the correct value28;
b. Radial error or root mean square error in the distance (1 σRMS or 1 DRMS): with the
assumption of equality of the standard deviations around two dimensions (σx σy)29, of
orthogonality between the axes x and y, of normal and not correlated distributions of error,
the following relationship is valid:
DRMS = σ x2 + σ y2 = 2 ⋅ σ 2 = 1,414 ⋅ σ (2.65)
Generally the measure of 2DRMS is employed, which corresponds to the 98.5% level of confidence.
27
“In a navigation system, the measure of the accuracy with which the system permits the user to return to a position as
defined only in terms of the co-ordinates peculiar to that system. The correlation between the geographical co-ordinates and
the system co-ordinates may or not may be known” (IHO S32 – fifth edition 1994, # 4336)
28
(see also probable error: IHO S32 – fifth edition 1994 – # 1689)
29
(see also standard error: IHO S32 – fifth edition 1994 – # 1695)
M-13
100
6.2.2 Lines of Position (LOPs)
Limiting distances to less than 60 miles, in the study of radio wave navigation systems, it is valid to
approximate to a horizontal terrestrial surface; for greater distances the line of position is considered as an
arc of maximum circle.
The systems most often used for radio wave navigation produce circular and hyperbolic lines of position,
which derive position from the measurement of a difference in time Δt or a difference in phase Δφ. Such
measurements are translated into differences of distances (hyperbolic LOPs) or direct distances (circular
LOPs) respectively with the relationships:
Δd = c ⋅ Δt (2.66)
c ⎡⎛ Δϕ ⎞ ⎤
Δd = ⋅ ⎜ ⎟+n
f ⎢⎣⎝ 2π ⎠ ⎥⎦
(2.67)
where:
Δd: is the difference of distance;
c: is the speed of propagation of the electromagnetic waves;
Δt: is the difference of measured time;
Δφ: is the difference of measured phase;
f: is the frequency of the wave on which the measurement is effected Δφ;
n: is the number of integer cycles of the received wave.
An error in the measurement of Δt or Δφ appears as an error in numeric line of position, while a deviation
of c from its standard value, creates a distortion in the whole pattern of the lines.
6.2.3 Circular lines of position (C LOPs)
Measuring the distance from a point of known co-ordinates it is possible to determine a line of position,
which is a circle having the observed position at the centre and the measured distance as the radius. The
error in the measurement of a distance influences and modifies the relative line of position producing a
band of uncertainty, whose proportions (standard deviation of the measurements of distance) are
independent of the distance.
The intersection of two circular lines of position effected by error produce an area of uncertainty, inside
which is the true position of the mobile. This area generally has the shape of a parallelogram. The
circular systems are characterized by the fact that the angle of intersection between the LOPs varies in the
area of coverage and, at a generic point P, is equal to that between the vector radii subtended by P to the
stations.
In the case of σ equal for both the sets of circumferences, the radial error drawn by (2.65) then becomes :
2σ 2 1,414 ⋅ σ
d RMS = = (2.68)
sin α sin α
where α is the angle of intersection between the two LOPs.
M-13
101
Considering therefore constant σ in the area of coverage, it is immediate evident that the dRMS, in circular
systems, is entirely dependent on the angle of intersection between the LOPs. The curves of equal
distance are identified, therefore, by those of equal α. They are of the complete arcs with this angle and
have their ends at the two stations.
6.2.4 Hyperbolic lines of position (H LOPs)
‘A hyperbola is an open curve (line of points in the plan) with two part, all points of which have a
constant difference in distances from two fixed points called foci’ (IHO S32 – fifth edition 1994 - # 2353).
Referred to an orthogonal Cartesian system, they are a varying curved symmetric ray as related to the axis
of the abscissas, the axis of the ordinates and to the origin.
In hyperbolic electronic navigation, the segment of the axis of the abscissas incorporated between the two
foci A and B is called the base-line. Two fixed points in a plane can be the foci of endless hyperbolae,
which will constitute a pattern of similarly focused hyperbolae.
In a system of similarly focused hyperbolae, representing geometric lines which differ one from the other
by a constant quantity, it can be observed:
a. The hyperbolae cross the base line at regular intervals of distance;

b. The distance between two hyperbola increases with the increase of distance from the base-
line.
In reality, the lines of position obtainable from hyperbolic radio navigation systems are hyperboloids. A
pair of synchronized radio stations located at the hyperboloids foci, each can be paired with one or more
other synchronized stations forming a hyperbolic chain. The observer is on one of the curved
hyperboloids which are produced by two pairs of radio stations. With the measurements made onboard,
the observer can determine his position by identifying the relevant spherical hyperbolas displayed on
charts or from special tables built for such a purpose.
6.2.5 Determination methods of electromagnetic wave lines of position (EW LOPs)
An electromagnetic wave LOP can be produced by the direct or indirect measurement of:
a. Distance;
b. Difference between distances.
The measurements which dimensionally express a distance, are in reality obtained by the transformation
of two possible and different kinds of measurement:
a. Difference of phase;
b. Difference of time.
6.2.6 Measurements of difference of phase
Differences of distances or distances can be determined from a measurement of phase difference.
M-13
102
a. Measures of distances:
Considering A, a point on the earth’s surface for which co-ordinates are known in a stated
reference system, with a station issuing a continuous electromagnetic wave with frequency f
and at a generic point P, a suitable receiver able to measure the difference between the phases
of the electromagnetic wave has, constantly, knowledge of the positions of A and P.
To make this possible, it requires the receiver to have an oscillatory wave of stable frequency
which is synchronised with that of the issuing station.
In such a way, supposing known conditions of propagation in the medium which separates
the station from the receiver, it is possible to know, constantly, the phase of the radio wave at
station A and to make a comparison with the phase of the incoming radio wave at the
receiver.
From the measurement of this phase difference it is possible to obtain the distance between
the transmitting station and the receiver to less than multiples of 2π (or of 360°). The related
line of position on the earth is represented by the circumference having A at the centre and
the calculated distance for the radius.
Defining a lane as the space between two LOPs with a phase difference of 360°, in this case it
is represented by the spherical circular area between the two circumferences. Therefore,
starting from the transmitting station, every point equal to the wavelength corresponds to
crossing a lane with a width equal to the wavelength.
The errors of measurement are expressed in cels (cents of lanes).
b. Measurement of difference of distances:
Sited at A and B are two radio wave transmitters of the same frequency, set at points on the
earth’s surface with known co-ordinates; at P a receiver able to receive separately the signals
coming from the two stations and to calculate, at the same time, the phase difference of the
two incoming radio waves. Except for multiples of 2π (or of 360°), such values allow the
receiver to obtain the difference of the distances it is from the two stations A and B.
Being a hyperbola, the line of the points of difference of distances from two fixed points
(called the foci) is constant, it results that from every point on a stated hyperbola the same
phase difference is measured.
It is possible to conclude that a measurement of phase difference defines a hyperbolic line of

position.
A receiver is able to measure in a lane only the absolute value of the phase difference, from
0° to 360°; this involves ambiguity, because such a difference is positive for one side of the
hyperbola and negative for the other.
Appropriate techniques ensure the sides of hyperbolas are always positive. The phase
difference is generally expressed in cents of lane (cels).
M-13
103
The identification, then, of the lane, to which the difference of measured phase refers, makes
it essential to know the lane in which the receiver was positioned when it was set to work; the
purpose is to regulate the special control switch which numerically records the passage across
into a whole new lane.
6.2.7 Measurement of difference of time
Measurement of Difference of time involves both the measurement of a temporal interval delimited by
two instants, which are recorded in succession, and the difference between two of these temporal
intervals.
The two different ways of interpreting this quantity, allow the determination of two types of
measurement: of distance and of difference of distances.
a. Measurement of distance:
The distance is obtained by the measurement of the time which passes between the
transmission of a transmitting station of known position at a known instant and the instant at
which the signal reaches the receiver.
What connects the measurement of this time interval to a distance is the speed of propagation
of the electromagnetic waves. Therefore, the ability to forecast the anomalies of propagation
defines the capability of the positioning system.
b. Measurement of difference of distances:
Two transmitting stations at A and B are set at positions of known co-ordinates.
The pulses from the two stations arrive sequentially at a receiver; with appropriate
techniques, it is possible to measure the difference in time between the arrivals of the signals.
It is clearly a function of the difference in distance of the receiver from the two stations.
The measurement of difference of time is made on both sides of the hyperbola, causing an
ambiguity, since the receiver is not able to establish which of the two pulses arrives first. To
eliminate this, the transmission of pulses is not simultaneous but is made at intervals of a
constant quantity (coding delay).
6.3 Acoustic Systems
Acoustic Positioning Systems were originally developed in the United States to support underwater
research studies in the 1960s. Since then, such systems have played an important role in providing
positioning for towed bodies, ROVs and in most phases of the offshore hydrocarbon industry, from initial
exploration through to field development and maintenance. More recent developments and technical
improvements have also seen it being used for military purposes.
Acoustic positioning is able to provide very high positional repeatability over a limited area, even at a
great distance from the shore. For many users repeatability is more important than absolute accuracy,
although the advent of GPS and integrated GPS/INS technology now makes it possible to achieve both
high precision and accuracy.
M-13
104
Modern GPS developments such as DGPS, WADGPS and RTKGPS may have reduced the use of
acoustic systems in areas such as seismic survey operations and seismic streamer tracking. However, in
positioning rigs relative to wellheads (whether the rig is anchored or dynamically positioned), ROV
tracking etc. acoustic positioning remains an important technique. Furthermore, in areas where sunspot
activity (most pronounced around the magnetic equator and the Polar Regions) can cause interference to
DGPS an acoustic system can provide a useful backup for GPS.
Acoustic Positioning Systems measure ranges and directions to beacons that are deployed on the seabed
or fitted to ROVs and towed bodies. The accuracy achieved will depend on the technique used, range and
environmental conditions. It can vary from a few metres to a few centimetres.
Acoustic positioning systems, produced by several manufacturers are generally available in the following
'standard' frequency bands
Classification Frequency Max Range
Low Frequency (LF) 8 – 16 kHz >10km

Medium Frequency (MF) 18 – 36 kHz 2 – 3½ km
High Frequency (HF) 30 – 64 kHz 1500 m
Extra High Frequency (EHF) 50 – 110 kHz <1000 m
Very High Frequency (VHF) 200 – 300 kHz <100 m
6.3.1 Acoustic Techniques
There are 3 primary techniques used in acoustic positioning systems, Long Baseline, Short Baseline and
Super or Ultra Short Baseline with some modern hybrid systems using a combination of these techniques.
6.3.1.1 Long Baseline Method (LBL)
LBL acoustic systems provide accurate fixing over a wide area by ranging from a vessel, towed sensor or
mobile target, to three or more transponders located at known positions on the seabed. Transponders are
interrogated by a transducer fitted to the surface vessel. The lines joining pairs of seabed transponders are
termed baselines and can vary in length from 50m to over 6km depending on the water depth, seabed
topography, the acoustic frequency used and the environmental conditions.
The LBL method provides accurate local control and high repeatability. If there is redundancy, i.e. 3 or
more position lines, the quality of each position fix can also be estimated.
M-13
105
Transducer
Transponder
Acoustic
Baseline
Fig. 2.21 “Long Baseline Meted”
Calibration of LBL Systems
Seabed transponders cannot be fixed or deployed as accurately as land based systems. Once laid,
however, a pattern of transponders must be fixed relative to each other and then tied into the geodetic
datum in use. The latter is usually achieved using GPS and the process of calibration generally follows
three steps:
a. Relative Geometry:Relative positioning is achieved by nominating one of the transponders as

the origin of the seabed array and defining its orientation by determining the direction to a
second transponder. To achieve this, the ship steams at random throughout the area, aiming
to cross each baseline at right angles at least once, gathering valid sets of slant ranges. These
ranges can then be processed to fix the relative positions of the seabed transponders by
trilateration and rigorous adjustment.
b. Orientation:The orientation process involves steaming with a constant heading along three
legs at 90° to 120° intervals, taking two well-separated acoustic fixes on each leg. The effect
of the tidal stream is cancelled by the course alterations and the network is aligned with north
as defined from GPS positions or by the ship's gyro compass.
c. Absolute Positioning: This is achieved by matching fixes obtained from the deployed
acoustic network with GPS positions.
6.3.1.2 Short Baseline Method (SBL)
SBL methods replace the large baselines formed between transponders on the seabed with baselines
between reference points on the hull of a surface vessel, i.e. the co-ordinate frame is now fixed to the
vessel instead of the seabed. Three or four transducers separated by distances of 10 to 100 metres are
fitted to the hull of the vessel and connected to a ship-borne acoustic processor.
M-13
106
Underwater targets or seabed positions are marked by single acoustic beacons, the transmissions from
which are received by the hull-mounted transducers. The returning signals – together with knowledge of
the SV in the water column – are passed to a central processor, where the horizontal offset between the
vessel and the beacon is computed. As with the LBL method, redundant observations are used to estimate
the quality and accuracy of the position fix.
Transducers
Transponder
Fig. 2.22 “Short Baseline Meted”
The position of the transponders on board the vessel can be accurately determined during installation.
Vessel heading and Roll and Pitch measurements have to be made during operation and as always a good
knowledge of Sound Velocity is required.
6.3.1.3 Ultra or Super Short Baseline Method (USBL or SSBL)
In a USBL system the 3 or 4 hull mounted transponders of an SBL system are replaced with a single hull
unit comprising an array of transducers. Phase comparison techniques are used to measure the angle of
arrival of an acoustic signal in both the horizontal and vertical planes. Thus, a single beacon located
either on the seabed or on a mobile target (e.g. a towed sonar body) can be fixed by measuring its range
and bearing relative to the target.
M-13
107
Fig. 2.23 “Ultra Short Baseline Meted”
The USBL method provides a simple positional reference input for dynamically positioned (DP) vessels
and is also convenient for tracking towed bodies and ROVs.
Although more convenient to install, a USBL transducer requires careful adjustment and calibration. A
compass reference is required and the bearing measurement must be compensated to allow for the pitch
and roll of the vessel and for refraction effects in the water column. Unlike conventional LBL and SBL
methods, there is no redundant information on standard USBL systems from which position accuracy can
be estimated and accuracy is normally stated as between 0.5 to 1% of the maximum slant range
measurement.
6.3.1.4 Combined Systems
These systems combine the benefits from all the above methods to provide a very reliable position with a
good level of redundancy. The combined systems come in several varieties:
• Long and Ultra Short Baseline (LUSBL)

• Long and Short Baseline (LSBL)
• Short and Ultra Short Baseline (SUSBL)
• Long, Short and Ultra Short Baseline (LSUSBL)
M-13
108
Fig. 2.24 “Combined System (LSUBL)”
6.3.1.5 Multi-User Systems
Multi-User systems are required when more than one vessel is working in close proximity and wishes to
use the same acoustic system e.g. a drilling vessel in an oilfield might have a construction barge, a pipe
lay barge and an ROV support vessel at the same location, all holding station by means of Dynamic
Positioning (DP). This means that the potential for "acoustic pollution" is significant. The following
solutions to this problem are either operational or under development (2004) are:
• Single "Master" seafloor beacon interrogation systems

• Master surface vessel with radio telemetry synchronisation to other vessels
• More channels within the same band through signal processing techniques
• The use of different frequency bands for different operations
6.3.2 Principles of Measurement
Range Measurement
a. If slant range (R) is determined by interrogating a transponder and θ is known then:

ct
R = and the horizontal distance (Y) can be determined by: Y = R sinθ
2
b. If transponder is replaced by an unintelligent 'pinger' beacon, direct slant range cannot be

obtained and the depth must be known to calculate the horizontal distance: Y = D tan θ
c. Knowledge of SV (c) allows θ to be determined by measuring differences in signal arrival

times between hydrophones 1 & 2 (Figures 2.25 & 2.26). Therefore the angular measurement
between a transducer/hydrophone and a beacon can be determined.
M-13
109
Hydrophone (2) A Hydrophone (1)
θ Slant Range (R)
Depth (D)
Beacon
Horizontal
Distance (Y)
Fig. 2.25 “Range determination”
Angular Measurement
d
H2
D d H1
H2 H1
θ
ΔR θ
R
Ray paths arrive at H2 as

virtually parallel rays
Fig. 2.26 “Angular Measurement”
cΔt
• Provided Sound Velocity is known: ΔR = cΔt and sin θ =
d
Where: c = Sound Velocity
Δt = Difference in arrival time of signal at H1 and H2
d = Distance between transducers/transducer elements/hydrophones
M-13
110
• A third transducer mounted at right angles to H1 and H2 enables the bearing of the beacon to
be determined.
• When a vessel is directly over a transponder, two hydrophones in the same axis will receive
signals in phase. This is a useful technique used in dynamic positioning, where any shift off
station is sensed by signals arriving out of phase.
d
Ref YY
cΔt
t1
θ
R
cΔt
sin θ =
d
t0
cΔt
Y = R sin θ =R
d
Y Beacon
Fig. 2.27
M-13
111
Calculating position in 2 planes
Transducer
Alongships
Athwartships
X
Y Z
θx
θy
Y X
Transponder
Fig. 2.28
X = R sin θx Y = R sin θy and therefore z = R(1 – sin2 θy – sin2 θx)1/2
Note: Apparent position requires adjustment for:
a. Pitch and roll.

b. hydrophone alignment (at installation).
c. Hydrophone offset (fixed amount).
d. Transponder offset (fixed amount).
The Z co-ordinate is calculated from acoustic data, therefore depth information can be used to improve
position accuracy under conditions of thermal gradients. Positioning accuracy is considered to be better
than 1% of slant range.
6.3.3 Accuracy and errors sources
The overall accuracy of an acoustic fix will depend on:
a. The accuracy with which a transponder array is established relative to a geodetic datum.
M-13
112
b. Determination and supression of multipath effects (reflections). This is particularly

noticeable in the region of fixed structures such as production platforms and is worse for
SSBL and SBL systems than for LBL systems.
c. The accurate determination of sound velocity, velocity gradients and the amount of
refraction.
d. The frequency used. Accuracy increases with increasing frequency but at the expense of
range and the power required.
e. The fix geometry and, to a certain degree seabed topography i.e. whether or not there is a 'line
of sight' between transponders.
f. The sophistication of the processing system and software being used.
g. Errors in time measurement owing to the presence of noise in the received signals. Noise
may be:
• Ambient Noise (NA): Waves, wind, rain, marine life.

• Self Noise (NS): Propulsion, machinery, flow
• Reverberation Noise (NR): Volume reverberation, sea surface, seabed structures.
Signal to Noise ratio (SNR) = E – N
Where E = SL – TL
N = 20Log10NT
And NT = (NA2 + NS2 + NR2)1/2
6.3.3.1 Sound Velocity Structure
Seawater is not a uniform, isotropic medium and therefore the velocity of sound in water is affected by
changes in temperature (the dominant factor), salinity and depth. The mean value of SV in seawater will
increase approximately as follows:
By 4½ m/s for every 1°C increase in temperature.

By 1.21 m/s for every part per thousand increase in salinity.
By 1 m/s for every 60 metre increase in depth.
All systems require a precise knowledge of the average sound velocity and preferably knowledge of the
SV profile. This is usually obtained by using an independent TSD probe or velocity profiler.
6.4 Optical Techniques
The following paragraphs contain only a brief summary of the traditional methods employed in dredging,
channel and harbour surveys. Most of them are no longer used due to the employment of Differential
GPS techniques, however they are still valid. Chapter 7 contains more detailed explanation of these
methods for hydrographic surveying.
M-13
113
6.4.1 Tag Line Positioning (Cable sounding)
The sounding survey with a cable is used for the lack of other positioning systems; it requires a tag line
kept in tension from an operator who holds the end of the cable anchored on the beach.
On the vessel another operator will unwind the line from a winch, always keeping it in tension.
Then, at slow speed, the vessel begins the sounding line (generally perpendicular to the beach) steered by
an operator who checks the direction followed by a planned fixed angle on circle to reflection (or sextant)
or other visual method.
6.4.2 Sextant Resection Positioning (Inverse intersection)
This system needs two operators with circle to reflection (or sextants) in the vessel.
They measure the difference in azimuth of points selected during the planning. Every fix during the
survey is the intersection between two LOPs; a sounding therefore is associated with the reading of two
differences of azimuth.
6.4.3 Triangulation/Intersection Positioning (Direct intersection)
The direct intersection guarantees greater precisions, but it requires two operators on the ground and a
reliable system of communication with the vessel.
The first operator, through a circle to reflection (or a theodolite), guides the vessel along the line,
communicating by radio any required adjustments, while the second, using a total station, determines
angles and distances of the vessel at established time intervals.
6.4.4 Range-Azimuth Positioning (Mixed system optic and electromagnetic)
It is a method which allows the generation of a position through the orthogonal intersection between two
LOPs. An EDM system and a theodolite (or total station), which observes the vessel, are utilised for
positioning.
M-13
114
REFERENCES
Luciano Surace “La georeferenziazione delle Estratto dal "Bollettino di geodesia

informazioni territoriali”1998 e scienze affini", 1998
A. Cina “GPS Principi Modalità e Tecniche di Celid, Prima edizione – 2000
Posizionamento”
L. Costa “Topografia” Cooperativa Libraria Universitaria

– Genova, Prima ristampa – 2001
IHO “Hydrographic Dictionary” S–32 International Hydrographic

Organization, Monaco, 5th edition –
1994
IHO “IHO Standards for Hydrographic International Hydrographic
Survey” S–44 Organization, Monaco, 4th edition –
1998

Survey” Supplement to S–44 Organization, Monaco, Draft
enclosed in letter IHB File N.
S3/7198 – 29 April 1998
USACE EM 1110-2-1003 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
“Hydrographic Surveying” Department of the Army,
Washington, 1 January 2002

“Geodetic and Control Surveying” Department of the Army,
Washington, 1 June 2002

“NAVSTAR Global Positioning System Department of the Army,
Surveying” Washington, 1 July 2003

“Topographic Surveying” Department of the Army,
Washington, 31 August 1994
NOAA “Hydrographic Manual” U.S. Department of Commerce

Melvin J. Umbach National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Rockville, Md. Administration (NOAA)
National Ocean Service (NOS),
Fourth Edition 4th July 1976
M-13
115
Admiralty “Manual of Hydrographic Surveying” Hydrographic Department

Admiralty (UKHO), Vol. I (1965)
and Vol. II (1970)
Simo H. Laurila “Electronic Surveying in practice” John Wiley & Sons, Inc
New York (USA), January 1983
Börje Forssell “Radio navigation system” Prentice Hall International (UK)
Ltd, 1991
M-13
116
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Luciano Surace “La georeferenziazione delle Estratto dal "Bollettino di geodesia

informazioni territoriali” 1998 e scienze affini", 1998
A. Cina “GPS Principi Modalità e Tecniche di Celid, Prima edizione – 2000
Posizionamento”
L. Costa “Topografia” Cooperativa Libraria Universitaria

– Genova, Prima ristampa – 2001
Romagna “Manuale di Idrografia per la Accademia Navale di Livorno, terza

Manoia G. costruzione delle carte marine edizione – 1949
II 3100. “Manuale dell’Ufficiale di Rotta” Istituto Idrografico della Marina,

Genova, Quinta edizione – 1992 /
Prima ristampa – 1998
NorMas “Norme di Massima per i Rilievi Istituto Idrografico della Marina,
FC 1028. Idrografici” Genova, Seconda edizione – 1978
Admiralty “Manual of Hydrographic Surveying” Hydrographic Department
Admiralty (UKHO), Vol. I (1965)
and Vol. II (1970)
IHO “Hydrographic Dictionary” S–32 International Hydrographic
Organization, Monaco, 5th edition –
1994
Survey” S–44 Organization, Monaco, 4th edition –
1998

Survey” Supplement to S–44 Organization, Monaco, Draft
enclosed in letter IHB File N.
S3/7198 – 29 April 1998
“Hydrographic Surveying” Department of the Army,
Washington, 1st January 2002

“Geodetic and Control Surveying” Department of the Army,
Washington.
1st June 2002
“NAVSTAR Global Positioning System Department of the Army,
Surveying” Washington, 1st July 2003
M-13
117

“Topographic Surveying” Department of the Army,
Washington, 31 August 1994
NOAA “Hydrographic Manual” U.S. Department of Commerce

Melvin J. Umbach National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Rockville, Md. Administration (NOAA)
Fourth Edition 4th July 1976
NOAA NOS Hydrographic Surveys U.S. Department of Commerce
“Specifications and Deliverables” National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA)
March 2003
Luigi Sinapi “Lezioni di Idrografia teorica ed Napoli, A.A. 2002/2003
operativa”
Simo H. Laurila “Electronic Surveying and Navigation” John Wiley & Sons, Inc
New York (USA), 1976
Simo H. Laurila “Electronic Surveying in practice” John Wiley & Sons, Inc
New York (USA), January 1983
Börje Forssell “Radio navigation system” Prentice Hall International (UK)
Ltd, 1991
Alam E. Ingham “Sea Surveying” John Wiley & Sons, Inc

New York (USA), July 1974
__________
M-13
118
M-13
119
CHAPTER 3
DEPTH DETERMINATION
1. INTRODUCTION
Depth determination is a fundamental task for a hydrographer, which requires specific knowledge of the
medium, of underwater acoustics, of the plethora of devices available for depth measurement, of
complementary sensors for attitude and heave measurement and proper procedures to achieve and meet
the internationally recommended standards for accuracy and coverage as articulated in IHO publication
S-44 4th Edition.
Lead line and sounding pole were the earliest methods used for directly measuring water depth. Their
easy principles of operation ensured their continued use over many centuries.
Single beam echo sounders, derived from military sonars, were a major development and have been used
in hydrographic surveying since the mid 1900s.
During the last decade, hydrographic surveying has experienced a conceptual change in depth
measurement technology and methodology. Multibeam echo sounders (MBES) and airborne laser
sounding systems (ALS) now provide almost total seafloor coverage and depth measurement. The high
data density and high acquisition rates have led to huge bathymetric data sets and much ancillary data.
The state of the art of the depth measurement equipment was evaluated by the working group of the S-44
[IHO, 1998] as follows:
“Single beam echo sounders have reached a sub-decimetre accuracy in shallow water. The
market offers a variety of equipment with different frequencies, pulse rates etc. and it is
possible to satisfy most users' and, in particular, the hydrographers' needs. (…)
Multibeam echo sounder technology is developing rapidly and offers great potential for
accurate and total seafloor search if used with proper procedures and provided that the
resolution of the system is adequate for proper detection of navigational hazards.
Airborne laser sounding is a new technology which can offer substantial productivity gains
for surveys in shallow, clear water. Airborne laser systems are capable of measuring depths
to 50 m or more.”
Despite these new technologies, single beam echo sounders (SBES) still remain, for the present, the
traditional equipment used on hydrographic surveys worldwide. These echo sounders have also evolved
from analogue to digital recording, with greater precisions and higher accuracies and with specific
features which allow a wider variety of purposes to be met. The use of digital echo sounders along with
motion sensors, satellite positioning systems (such as GPS) and software for data acquisition have
combined to optimize productivity with corresponding reductions in personnel for survey operations.
MBES have become a valuable tool for depth determination when full seafloor ensonification is required.
An increasing number of National Hydrographic Offices (NHO) has adopted multibeam technology as the
methodology of choice for the collection of bathymetric data for new chart production. The acceptance of
M-13
120
multibeam data for use in published nautical charts is a sign of growing confidence in the technology.
Notwithstanding their impressive capabilities, it is vital that planners, operators and checkers have
indepth knowledge of MBES operating principles, as well as practice in data interpretation and validation.
Airborne laser sounding systems are being used by a few NHOs; these systems have, by far, the highest
data acquisition rates and are particularly suited to near shore and shallow water areas. However, the high
costs for the assets involved in data collection and their operation do not currently allow a more general
use.
In this Chapter, Section 2 covers the broad acoustic fundamentals necessary for the understanding of sea
water acoustic waves and physical characteristics, acoustic wave propagation and acoustic parameters.
Section 3 deals with motion sensors. Section 4 covers transducer characteristics, their classification with
regard to beam pattern, principles of operation and their installation. Section 5 describes the acoustic
systems of single beam echo sounders and swath systems, both multibeam and interferometric sonars,
with regard to their characteristics, principles of operation, installation and operational use. Finally,
Section 6 explains non-acoustic systems, such as airborne laser and electromagnetic induction systems,
remote sensing systems and classic mechanical devices.
The terminology used in this chapter follows, as far as possible, the Hydrographic Dictionary [IHO SP-32
5th Edition, 1994].
2. ACOUSTIC AND MOTION SENSORS FUNDAMENTALS
Sea water is the medium in which hydrographic measurements normally take place, therefore knowledge
of sea water’s physical properties and of acoustic waves propagation is important for full comprehension
of the contents and aim of this chapter.
2.1 Sea water acoustic waves and physical characteristics
Despite electromagnetic waves having an excellent propagation in a vacuum and air, they hardly
penetrate nor propagate through liquids. However, acoustic waves, either sonic or ultra-sonic, achieve
good penetration and propagation through all elastic media once these media can be made to vibrate when
exposed to pressure variations. The majority of the sensors used for depth determination use acoustic
waves.
2.1.1 Acoustic field
The acoustic waves consist of subtle variations of the pressure field in the water. Sea water particles
move longitudinally, back and forth, in the direction of the propagation of the wave, producing adjacent
regions of compression and expansion, similar to those produced by longitudinal waves in a bar.
The intensity of the acoustic wave, I, is the amount of energy per second crossing a unit area. The
acoustic intensity is given by:
p e2
I= (3. 1)
ρc
M-13
121
where ρ is the water density, c is the sound velocity in the water and pe is the effective acoustic
pressure30, given by the root mean square of the peak pressure amplitude, P, i.e.:
P
pe =
2
The acoustic wave intensity is computed using average acoustic pressure rather than instantaneous values.
The acoustic pressure and intensity, due to their wide range variation, are usually expressed in logarithmic
scales referred to pressure and intensity levels, the decibel scale being the most common logarithmic
scale.
The acoustic intensity level, IL, is given by:
I
IL = 10 log10 (3. 2)
I Re f
where IRef is the reference intensity.
The acoustic intensity level is alternatively expressed by,
pe
IL = 20 log10 (3. 3)
p Re f
where pRef is the reference pressure31.
2.1.2 Sonar Equation
The sonar32 equation is used to study and express the detection capability and performance of echo
sounders as a function of operating conditions [Urick, 1975].
The sonar equation for echo sounders defines the signal or echo detection as the Echo Excess (EE),
EE = SL - 2 TL - (NL-DI) + BS – DT (3. 4)
where SL = source level, TL = transmission loss, NL = noise level, DI = directivity index, BS = bottom
backscattering strength and DT = detection threshold.
In this section each term of the sonar equation is presented and studied to enable a better understanding of
the processes involved in acoustic signal propagation and echo detection.
The acoustic wave intensity Ir at a distance r from the transmitter is obtained by,
p 2r
Ir = W m2 (3. 5)
ρc
30
Pascal (Pa) is the unit of pressure in the International System (SI).
31
In underwater acoustics reference pressure is usually adopted as 1 μPa.
32
SOund NAvigation and Ranging.
M-13
122
Where pr is the effective pressure at the distance r from the source and ρc is the acoustic impedance33
(considering a sound velocity of 1500 m/s and sea water density of 1026 kg/m3 the acoustic impedance is
ρc = 1.54 ⋅ 106 kg/m2s).
The Source Level (SL) gives the acoustic signal intensity level referred to the intensity of a plane34 wave
with root mean square (rms) pressure 1 μPa, for a point located 1 metre away from the centre of the
source (transmitter), i.e.:
I1
SL = 10 ⋅ log10 (3. 6)
I Re f
The Transmission Loss (TL) takes into account the losses of acoustic intensity due to geometry, i.e. from
spreading losses, proportional to r2 and the losses due to absorption, proportional to the coefficient of
absorption, dependent on the physical and chemical sea water properties and on the acoustic frequency
(see 2.3.1).
The spreading loss is caused by the geometry of the beam with its cone shape (Figure 3.1). The increase
in area results in the decrease of power per unit of area.
A
Ω=
Ω R2
A1 A2
R1
R2
Fig. 3.1 "Spreading loss due to beam geometry"
The power, Π, of the acoustic pulse is equal to Intensity x Area:
Π = I1⋅A1 = I2⋅A2
where A1 = Ω⋅R12 and A2= Ω⋅R22, being Ω the solid angle35.
33
Acoustic impedance corresponds to the resistance of the medium to the wave propagating through it, i.e., a proportionality
factor between the velocity and the acoustic pressure.
34
Plane waves occur in a small region away from the source where wave fronts (points where vibrations are in phase), are
approximately plane and have negligible change in amplitude.
35
The solid angle, Ω, is the space enclosed by a conical surface. The value, expressed in steradian (sr), is obtained as Ω=S/R2,
where S is the spherical surface with centre in the apex of the cone and radius R.
M-13
123
Therefore, the relation of intensities is given by:
2
I1 ⎛ R 2 ⎞
=⎜ ⎟ (3. 7)
I 2 ⎜⎝ R 1 ⎟⎠
If one considers the reference intensity at R1 = 1 m, the distance at which the source level (SL) is
determined, the logarithmic ratio of the intensities relates to the transmission loss due to spreading is:
I 1
10 ⋅ log10 = 10 ⋅ log10 = −20 ⋅ log10 R 2 (3. 8)
I Re f R 22
Hence, the transmission loss is given by:
TL = 20 log 10 r + ar (3. 9)
where r is the distance to the transducer and a the absorption coefficient.
The Noise Level (NL) is dependent on the environmental spectral noise level (N0) and on the transducer
bandwidth during reception (w),
NL = N0 + 10 log 10 w (3. 10)
The noise in the ocean is generated by several sources [Urick, 1975] such as: waves, rain, seismic
activity, thermal noise, living organisms and man-made.
Besides noise, it is also important to take into account the combined affect of the backscattering acoustic
energy created by various marine bodies; these include surface waves, air bubbles, marine life, materials
in suspension, etc. This contribution is known as the Reverberation Level (RL).
Transducers usually have the capacity to concentrate the energy within a conical shape (Figure 3.2). This
property can be quantified, for the sonar equation, as the ratio from the intensity within the beam to the
intensity of an omni directional point source with the same power.
4πR2, I0
S, I
Fig. 3.2 "Ensonified surfaces from an omni directional source and directional source"
M-13
124
The power, Π, of the acoustic pulse is equal to (Intensity x Area). Therefore, considering the same power
for the omni directional and directional sources:
Π = I0⋅4πR2 = I⋅S (3. 11)
The ratio of intensities is given by:
I 4πR 2
= (3. 12)
I0 S
and the Directivity Index (DI) is obtained by:
I 4πR 2
DI = 10 log10 = 10 log10 (3. 13)
I Re f S
For an array with length, L, and wave length, λ, (with L>>λ) the Directivity Index is given by:
DI = 10 log 10 (2L/λ) (3. 14)
The acoustic energy returned from the seafloor is the energy used by sonar systems, as well as the remote
means by which to deduce some seafloor properties. Knowledge of the beam angle and the sound
velocity profile in the water column allows one to obtain backscatter strength corrected for absorption and
spherical spreading.
Each particle on the seafloor can be likened to a reflector and the seabed return as the sum of the energy
contributions from the water-seabed interface and from the volume of sediments, due to some energy
penetration into the sediments. However, the contribution from the volume of sediments is less
significant when using high frequencies.
The seabed Backscattering Strength (BS) is usually described as the logarithmic sum of intrinsic
backscattering strength per unit area or backscatter index (SB), which is dependent on the reflective
properties of the seafloor and the effective instantaneous scattering area A, the area of the seafloor which
contributes to the backscattered signal:
BS = SB + 10 log 10 A dB. (3. 15)
The limits of the backscattering area are defined by the beam geometry, particularly by the beam width
(of the transmit beam) in the along-track direction at normal incidence or nadir, φT, and by the beam
width (of the receive beam) in the across-track direction at nadir, φR.
For the off-nadir directions, the backscattering area is bounded by the beam width, φT, and by the
transmitted pulse length τ (Figure 3.3). The seafloor backscattering strength may be given by:
M-13
125
⎧
⎪⎪ SB + 10 ⋅ log10 (φ T φ R R ) beam width constrict
2
BS = ⎨ (3. 16)
⎛ ⎞
⎪ SB + 10 ⋅ log10 ⎜⎜ cτ φ T R ⎟⎟ pulse length constrict
⎪⎩ ⎝ 2sinβ ⎠
where R is the slant range from the transducer to the point on the seafloor, c is the velocity of the sound
and β is the beam angle with reference to the vertical.
The backscatter coefficient, SB, is usually partially dependent upon the angle of incidence, the largest
variation being near nadir and typically follows a Lambert’s law [Urick, 1975 and de Moustier, 1993]
dependence at larger angles of incidence. It is common to define:
SB = BSN , for normal incidence (β = 0º)

SB = BSO⋅ cos2 β, for oblique incidence (β > 10-25º)
Typically, BSN will be about -15 dB and BSO about -30 dB. These values may change within ±10 dB or
even more depending on seabed type and roughness.
Looking at the beam footprint (ensonified area), Figure 3.3, the instantaneous ensonified area, A, is a
function of the transmitted beam width, φT. The number of samples per beam depends on the sampling
interval (τS).
Transducer
β
φR
R
A A
y
cτ/(2sinβ)
c = sound velocity
τ = pulse length
Fig. 3.3 "Backscatter samples"
The Detection Threshold (DT) is a system dependent parameter which establishes the lowest level above
which the echo sounder can detect the returning echoes.
M-13
126
2.1.3 Temperature
The temperature at the sea surface varies with the geographic position on the earth, with the season of the
year and the time of the day [Pickard and Emery, 1990]. The temperature field distribution is a complex
one and can not be predicted with enough accuracy for hydrographic surveys; through the water column
the behaviour of the temperature is also very complex. Such unpredictability necessitates a
comprehensive distribution of sound velocity profile casts, both temporally and spatially, to maintain a
representative currency of the sound velocity profiles for the survey area.
The depth measurement is quite sensitive to variations of the sound velocity profile; a variation of one
degree Celsius in temperature translates to approximately 4.5 m/s in sound velocity variation.
The temperature variation is the dominant factor for sound velocity variation between the surface and the
lower limit of the thermocline36, thereafter pressure becomes the principal influence.
2.1.4 Salinity
The salinity is a measure of the quantity of dissolved salts and other minerals in sea water. It is normally
defined as the total amount of dissolved solids in sea water in parts per thousand (ppt or ‰) by weight.
In practice, salinity is not determined directly but is computed from chlorinity, electrical conductivity,
refractive index or some other property whose relationship to salinity is well established. As a result of
the Law of Constancy of Proportions, the level of chlorinity in a sea water sample is used to establish the
sample's salinity37.
The average salinity of sea water is around 35 ‰. The rate of variation of sound velocity is
approximately 1.3 m/s for a 1 ‰ alteration in salinity. Typically the salinity is measured with a CTD cast
(Conductivity, Temperature and Depth) using the observable electrical conductivity, see 2.2.1.2.
2.1.5 Pressure
The pressure also impacts significantly on the sound velocity variation. Pressure is a function of depth
and the rate of change of sound velocity is approximately 1.6 m/s for every alteration of 10 atmospheres,
i.e. approximately 100 metres of water depth38.
The pressure has a major influence on the sound velocity in deep water.
2.1.6 Density
Water density is dependent upon the previous parameters, i.e. temperature, salinity and pressure.
Fifty percent of the ocean waters have a density between 1027.7 and 1027.9 kg/m3. The largest influence
on density is compressibility with depth. Water with a density of 1028 kg/m3 at the surface would have a
density of 1051 kg/m3 at a depth of 5000 metres.
36
The thermocline is also called discontinuity layer or thermal layer. The thermocline corresponds to a vertical negative
temperature gradient in some layers of the water column, which is appreciably greater than the gradients above and below it.
The main thermoclines in the ocean are either seasonal, due to heating of the surface water in summer, or permanent.
37
A joint committee (IAPO, UNESCO, ICES, and SCOR) proposed the universal adoption of the following equation for
determining salinity from chlorinity: S = 1.80655 Cl.
38
This is derived by the hydrostatic principle, i.e., p(z) = p0 + ρgz.
M-13
127
2.2 Salinity, Temperature, and Sound Velocity Determination
This subsection describes the instrumentation used for salinity, temperature and sound velocity
determination as well as their operating principles and the calculation for mean sound velocity.
2.2.1 Instrumentation
2.2.1.1 Sound Velocity Profiler is the most common instrument used to measure the sound velocity
profile through the water column. This instrument has one pressure sensor to measure depth, a
transducer and a reflector a certain distance, d, apart. The sound velocity is calculated by the
equation c = 2d/Δt, where Δt is the two-way travel time of the acoustic signal between the
transducer and the reflector (similar to the depth measurement performed by echo sounders).
2.2.1.2 CTD is an electronic instrument with sensors for conductivity, temperature and depth. This
instrument records the salinity by directly measuring the electrical conductivity of the sea water.
Sound velocity in the water varies with the medium’s elasticity and density, which are dependent
upon the salinity, temperature and pressure. With the information from the CTD (salinity,
temperature and pressure) it is possible to calculate the sound velocity in the water based on
empirical equations. One simple equation with adequate accuracy was presented by Coppens
[Kinsler et al., 1982]:
C (Z, T, S) = 1449.05 + T[4.57 - T(0.0521 - 0.00023⋅T)] + (3. 17)

+ [1.333 - T(0.0126 - 0.00009⋅T)](S - 35) + Δ(Z)
where T is the temperature in degrees Celsius (ºC), S is the salinity in parts per thousand (ppt), Z
is the depth in km, and Δ(Z) ≈ 16.3⋅Z + 0.18⋅Z2.
This equation is valid for a latitude of 45º. For other latitudes, Z should be replaced by
Z[1 - 0.0026⋅cos (2ϕ)], being ϕ the latitude.
2.2.1.3 Thermistors are elements whose electrical resistance depends on their temperature, which
depends on the amount of heat radiation39 falling on it from the sea. Thermistor chains are used
to measure the water temperature at several depths through the water column. These chains,
usually moored, consist of several thermistor elements, regularly spaced along a cable. A data
logger samples each element sequentially and records the temperatures as a function of time.
2.2.2 Instrument operation
Important for successful operation of a sound velocity profiler, before deployment, the profiler should
have the correct parameters entered with the required recording settings and be calibrated with the correct
atmospheric offset in order to generate reliable depth measurements.
It should be stressed that, during the atmospheric offset calibration, a sound velocity profiler should not
be in a pressurised compartment or the calibration will produce biased offsets and thus erroneous depth
measurements.
39
The heat radiation rate is given by Stefan’s Law which states that the rate of emission of heat radiation from an object is
proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature.
M-13
128
Before deployment, the profiler should be in the water for approximately 15 minutes for thermal
stabilisation and during a sound velocity cast, it is recommended a constant deployment speed is
maintained.
2.2.3 Data recording and processing
Sound velocity profiles should be edited and carefully checked for anomalous depths and sound velocity
readings.
In general, velocity profilers record both depth and sound velocity, both downwards and upwards. The
two profiles should be compared to confirm they are similar after which the profiles are often meaned to
create the final profile, although this not necessarily required, in any event the readings should be
compared and additional information removed to allow sorting into ascending or descending order.
2.2.4 Sound velocity computation
After the sound velocity profile has been validated, it can be applied to the survey file. The computation
is used to correct depth measurements with sound velocity profile data.
For beams near the vertical, specific case of single beam echo sounders, it is accurate enough to use the
average sound velocity in the water column. However, away from nadir, it is necessary to perform ray
tracing to take account of the beam curvature due to any refraction phenomenon encountered; this is the
procedure used in MBES (see 5.2.1.8.1).
For a signal transmitted vertically (i.e., θ0 = 0º), the harmonic mean sound velocity, ch for a depth zn is
obtained by:
zn
c h (z n ) = (3. 18)
n
1 ⎛ ci ⎞
∑
i =1 g i
ln⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
⎝ c i −1 ⎠
c i − c i −1
where gi is the constant gradient at layer i, given by: gi = .
z i − z i −1
2.3 Sea water sound propagation
This section focuses on sound propagation namely attenuation, reflection, and refraction.
2.3.1 Attenuation
Attenuation is the loss in energy of a propagating wave due to absorption, spherical spreading and
scattering by particles in the water column.
The absorption is the result of dissociation and association of some molecules in the water column;
magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) is a major source of absorption in salt water. The rate of absorption is
dependent on the physical and chemical properties of sea water and on the acoustic frequency being
transmitted. From Figure 3.4 it can be seen that above a frequency of 100 kHz the absorption coefficient
increases with the increase of temperature; thus, it can be expected that sonar range will vary with the
water temperature.
M-13
129
The spherical spreading is dependent on the geometry; for a solid angle the acoustic energy spreads over a
larger area as the distance from the source increases.
Both losses by absorption and spherical spreading are taken into account in the sonar equation (see 2.1.2).
However, losses from scattering depend upon particles or bodies present in the water column; scattering is
chiefly due to marine organisms, a major source of which is the deep scattering layer (DSL) which
consists of a layer of plankton whose depth varies throughout the day.
Absorption Coefficient
100
90
80
70 5º C
10º C
60
a (dB/km)
15º C
50 20º C
40
30
20
10
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Frequency (kHz)
Fig. 3.4 "Absorption coefficient"
2.3.2 Refraction and reflection
Refraction is the process in which the direction of propagation of the acoustic wave is altered due to a
change in sound velocity within the propagating medium or as the energy passes through an interface,
representing a sound velocity discontinuity between two media.
Consider two media (Figure 3.5) with different sound velocities, c1 and c2; if c1 is greater than c2, the
direction of the acoustic wave propagation is altered and the transmit angle will be smaller than the angle
of incident. In contrast, if c1 is smaller than c2, the direction of the acoustic wave propagation is changed
and the transmit angle will be greater than the angle of incident. For normal incidence no refraction
occurs.
For normal incidence and smooth seabeds, the reflection coefficient40 for the pressure, ℜ, is obtained by
the ratio of the amplitude pressure of the reflected wave by the amplitude pressure of the incident wave
[Kinsler et al., 1982].
40
It is also possible to define reflection coefficients for power and intensity. For normal incidence the reflection coefficient
for power and intensity is the square of the reflection coefficient for the pressure.
M-13
130
PR ρ 2 c 2 − ρ1c1
ℜ= = (3. 19)
PI ρ 2 c 2 + ρ1c1
θ1 θ1
c1 > c2 c1 c1 < c2 c1
c2 c2
θ2
θ2
Fig. 3.5 "Refraction principle"
For general conditions, the ratio of acoustic intensity reflected and transmitted depends mainly on:
• Contrast between the acoustic impedances of the media;

• Seafloor roughness;
• Acoustical frequency.
2.4 Acoustic parameters
The characteristics of an echo sounder are determined by the transducers, namely the directivity, beam
width, beam steering and side lobes level. In this subsection each of these parameters is analyzed.
2.4.1 Frequency
The echo sounder’s acoustic frequency is the parameter which determines the range and the sound
penetration of sediments. The attenuation of the acoustic signal in the water is proportional to the
frequency. The higher the frequency is, the higher the attenuation will be and, consequently, the lower
the range and the penetration into the seafloor.
The beam width is dependent on the acoustic wave length and on the size of the transducer. For the same
beam width a lower frequency will require a larger transducer.
The frequencies of bathymetric echo sounders are typically:
• Waters shallower than 100 metres: frequencies higher than 200 kHz;
• Waters shallower than 1500 metres: frequencies from 50 to 200 kHz;
• Waters deeper than 1500 metres: frequencies from 12 to 50 kHz;
M-13
131
The frequencies for sediment echo sounders are below 8 kHz.
2.4.2 Band width
Taking f0 as the frequency of maximum power transmission (resonance frequency) and f1 and f2 as the
frequencies corresponding to one half of that power, the band width is the frequency interval between
these frequencies (Figure 3.6), i.e. W = f 2 − f 1
The transducer’s quality factor, Q, is given by,
f0
Q= (3. 20)
W
From the definitions above one can see that Q and W have reciprocal variation. Hence, to optimize the
transmission power, the transducer should transmit close to the resonance frequency and therefore have a
small band width, i.e. a high quality factor value.
During reception it is necessary to have good echo discrimination from any other signal. Although, it
must be well defined in the frequency range, the transducer band width should satisfy W ≥ 1/τ, where τ is
the pulse duration.
The optimized solution is to have a transmission transducer with high Q and a reception transducer
operating in the same frequency of resonance but with a low Q.
Gain
(-3 dB)
f1 fr f2 Frequency
Fig. 3.6 "Transducer band width"
2.4.3 Pulse length
The pulse length determines the energy transmitted into the water; for the same power, the longer the
pulse length, the higher the energy put into the water will be and thus the greater the range that can be
achieved with the echo sounder.
To take advantage of the transducer resonant frequency, the pulse duration should be at least half its
natural period. The drawback of longer pulses is the decrease in vertical resolution of two adjacent
features (Figure 3.7).
M-13
132
Transducer
Echogram
Time
mid-water return
τ
τ’
Ö bottom
Ö depth
____ Short pulse (τ’)

___ Long pulse (τ)
bottom
Fig. 3.7 "Resolution as a function of pulse length"
3. MOTION SENSORS
Being able to correct the observed depths and their positioning for vessel motion, i.e. attitude (roll, pitch,
and heading) and heave was a considerable achievement and advance in hydrographic surveying quality
and accuracy. For this purpose inertial sensors with a heading sensor (usually a gyro or fluxgate
compass) or inertial sensors with the integration of GPS information are used to measure the attitude and
heave of the survey vessel.
The attitude of the vessel consists of three rotations about the conventional three orthogonal axes defined
for the vessel. Hereafter the vessel co-ordinate system is defined as a right-hand system with the x axis
pointing towards the bow, the y axis pointing towards starboard and the z axis pointing downwards. In
this reference system roll corresponds to a rotation about the x axis (the roll is positive when the starboard
side is down), pitch corresponds to a rotation about the y axis (the pitch is positive when the bow is up),
and yaw corresponds to a rotation about the z axis (the yaw is positive for a clockwise rotation).
To transform the collected data, referred to the vessel reference frame, to the local co-ordinate system it is
necessary to perform rotations according to the sensed attitude. Hereafter, by convention, the local co-
ordinate system is defined as a left-hand system with the x axis pointing to East, the y axis pointing to
North, and the z axis pointing downwards.
This next section covers the fundamentals of motion sensing and measurement accuracy.
M-13
133
3.1 Principles of operation
3.1.1 Inertial sensors
Inertial sensors or Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) are the most common sensors used in hydrography
for roll, pitch and heave measurements. These sensors apply Newton’s laws for motion and consist of
three accelerometers, mounted in tri-orthogonal axes, and three angular rate sensors placed in the same
frame which thus experience the same angular motions as the vessel (strap down system). The output
from this triad of accelerometers provides a good estimation of the gravity vector, the direction from
which small angular displacements of the vessel are measured. The triad of angular rate sensors measures
the angular displacements (i.e., roll, pitch, and yaw).
The heave is determined by the double integration of the linear acceleration sensed by the vertical
accelerometer.
The data from the accelerometers are low-pass filtered to remove high frequency variations from the
apparent vertical due to swell, quick turns or sudden velocity variations. On the other hand, the data from
the angular rate sensors are high-pass filtered to remove the low frequency movements. Therefore the
filter output is the platform attitude with frequency above the selected cut-off frequency (usually, cut-off
frequencies of 5 to 20 seconds are acceptable).
When the vessel undergoes any systematic acceleration, whose duration exceeds the time constant of the
low-pass filter applied to the accelerometers, such as prolonged turns or velocity variation, the centripetal
or tangential acceleration are perceived as prolonged horizontal accelerations which can not be filtered
out by the low-pass filter. The result is the deflection of the apparent vertical from the true vertical with
the consequent errors on angular measurements (pitch and roll).
The combination from the two filters (low- and high-pass filters) and the relationship between the two
pass bands establishes the sensor characteristics.
These inertial sensors, especially for heave, are very sensitive to the interval of time used for the
integration. The equivalent cut-off frequency should be tuned to an adequate value, in order to detect the
longer waves without dumping or attenuating the shorter ones.
3.1.2 Inertial sensors with the integration of GPS information
The integration of GPS information provides a means of determining the vessel’s heading through the use
of two GPS antennas in a base line, usually oriented longitudinally to the vessel’s bow.
The velocity and rate of turn information provided by a GPS receiver and by the angular rate sensors can
be used to compute the centripetal acceleration. Taking into account this information, roll and pitch
measurements are compensated for the deflection of the apparent vertical. The output from this sensor is
roll and pitch of higher accuracy which is not susceptible to any horizontal accelerations.
3.2 Roll, pitch, and heave measurement
Since the mid 1990s, affordable and accurate motion sensors have been utilised in hydrographic
surveying. It is now considered an essential requirement not only for multibeam but also for single beam
surveys when using automatic data acquisition systems. These sensors are used to compensate the
vessel’s motion for roll, pitch and heave.
M-13
134
The calculated depths must take into consideration the data from the motion sensor, i.e. the value from the
oscillation of the survey vessel about the longitudinal axis (roll - θR), the value from the oscillation of the
survey vessel about the transversal axis (pitch - θP), the vessel’s heading (α) and the vertical oscillation
(heave) see Figure 3.8 and Annex A.
3.3 Heading
The recording and application of vessel heading is essential for swath surveying systems. However, for
single beam surveys the effect of heading variation (yaw) during a rotation is not significant if the
positioning antenna and the transducer are located in the same vertical axis. When the positioning
antenna and the transducer are not in the same vertical axis, for accurately positioned depths, it is
necessary to take account of the vessel’s heading.
For real-time heading measurement, several methods and equipment are available, such as: gyro
compasses, fluxgate compasses and carrier-phase DGPS.
The heading measurement based on carrier-phase is conducted in the inertial sensors which integrates
DGPS information. This solution allows for high accuracies.
x x
yL α xL x
y y y
θR
z ≡ zL z zL zL θP z
Heading Roll Pitch
Fig. 3.8 "Vessel attitude"
3.4 Accuracy of measurement
The accuracy of roll, pitch, heave and heading should be as higher as possible. Presently available motion
sensors are sufficiently accurate to be used in almost all survey orders. However, during horizontal
accelerations of the survey vessel, either centripetal or tangential accelerations, inertial sensors, when
used alone, have measurement biases due to the deviation of the apparent vertical.
For MBES it is recommended the inertial sensors are combined with the integration of DGPS information
so that the effect of horizontal accelerations can be minimised. Usual systems accuracies, at 95%
confidence level, are 0.05º for roll and pitch, 0.2º for heading and 10 centimetres or 10% of heave height
whichever is greater.
M-13
135
During vessel turns the heave measurement is degraded due to the centripetal acceleration. Typically it is
necessary to wait an interval of ten times the cut-off period to regain accurate measurements after the turn
to allow stabilisation and settling of the measuring unit.
4. TRANSDUCERS
The transducers41 are one of the echo sounders’ components; it is transducer characteristics which dictate
some of the operating features of an echo sounder. For this reason it is particularly important to study
their operating principles, characteristics and related issues such as: beam width, directivity, beam
steering, installation and coverage.
The transducers are the devices used for transmission and reception of the acoustic pulses. They operate
by converting electrical energy into mechanical energy, i.e. transducers convert electrical pulses from a
signal generator to longitudinal vibrations which propagate into the water column as a pressure wave
[Seippel, 1983]. During the reception, reciprocally, the pressure waves are converted into electrical
signals.
This section describes transducer classifications with regard to: operating principles, beam, beam width,
and installation, at the end of the section the assessment of the ensonification is presented.
4.1 Classification with Regard to Operation
Transducers are classified with regard to their operating principle, i.e. magnetostrictive, piezoelectric, and
electrostrictive.
4.1.1 Magnetostrictive
These transducers have an axis of iron with a coil of nickel. A D.C. (direct current) current or pulse
through the axis generates a magnetic field in the coil which produces a contraction and consequently a
reduction of its diameter. When the electric current along the axis stops the coil returns to its original
size.
The application of an A.C. (alternating current) signal generates contractions and expansions according to
the characteristics of the applied signal. The amplitude of the induced vibration will be a maximum if the
frequency is equal or harmonically related to the transducer material’s natural frequency or frequency of
resonance42.
This type of transducer is, however, less efficient than transducers which operate with the piezoelectric
effect.
4.1.2 Piezoelectric
These transducers are made from two plates with a layer of quartz crystals between. The application of
an electric potential across the plates produces a variation in the thickness of the quartz layer
(piezoelectric effect). Alteration of the electric potential causes vibration of the quartz and consequently
vibration of the entire unit. Reciprocally, the mechanical compression of the crystal produces a potential
41
The transducer is the device, underwater antenna, used to transmit acoustic pulses and to receive them back. In particular, if
the device is used only for transmission it is called a projector and if it is exclusively used for reception, operated in passive
mode, it is called a hydrophone.
42
This phenomenon corresponds to the re-enforcement or prolongation of any wave motion, such as acoustic waves. The
frequency of resonance is the frequency at which a transducer vibrates more readily.
M-13
136
difference between opposite crystal faces. The amplitude of the vibration will be a maximum if the
frequency of the electric potential matches the quartz natural frequency.
4.1.3 Electrostrictive
These transducers are based on the same principle of the piezoelectric transducers. However, the
materials used (usually polycrystalline ceramics or certain synthetic polymers) do not have naturally
piezoelectric characteristics, therefore during the manufacturing processes they need to be polarized.
Electrostrictive transducers are used almost exclusively these days. These transducers are lighter,
reversible and can be arranged in arrays. These arrays with a set of small elements, when properly
arranged, allow, according to the product theorem (see 4.2, equation 3.26), similar characteristics to a
single piece transducer.
4.2 Beam width
The pressure amplitude generated by a transducer, in polar co-ordinates, is given by the product:
P(r, θ) = Pax (r ) ⋅ h (θ) (3. 21)
Where θ is the angle referred to the beam axis, line of maximum pressure amplitude and intensity, r is the
range from a particular point to the transducer, Pax(r) is the pressure amplitude in the acoustic beam axis,
and h(θ) is the directional factor which corresponds to the relative signal strength. The directional factor
is normalized for θ = 0, i.e. h(0) = 1, hence P( r ,0) = Pax ( r ) .
The transducer directivity is usually represented by a beam pattern diagram B(θ) = h 2 (θ) or in a
logarithmic scale as: b(θ) = 10 ⋅ log10 (B(θ) ) = 20 ⋅ log10 (h (θ) ) .
The transducer can be characterized by its beam width bw; this is commonly defined by the angle at the -3
dB level, that is to say, the angular aperture corresponding to half power referred to the beam axis bw =
2θ-3dB, see Figure 3.9.
The depth measurement is performed in any direction within the cone defined by the beam width.
The beam width is related to the physical dimensions of the transducer and to the frequency of the
acoustic pulses. For instance, the beam width at the -3 dB level from a circular piston transducer, with a
D diameter, can be approximated by:
bw = 60 λ / D (degrees), (3. 22)
and for a rectangular face transducer, with length L and width W, the beam widths at the -3 dB level in
the two dimensions can be respectively approximated by:
bw = 50 λ / L and bw = 50 λ / W (degrees), (3. 23)
For a linear array of N omni directional transducer elements, with a distance d apart, the sum of the
signals from the elements generates a directional beam pattern diagram (figures 3.10 and 3.11).
M-13
137
Side lobes -3 dB
Main lobe 0 dB
Fig. 3.9 "Beam width defined by the angle at a –3dB level”
The acoustic axis direction is perpendicular to the face of the transducer array. The beam width, at the -3
dB level, is given approximately by:
bw = 50 λ / ((N-1)d) (degrees) (3. 24)
where λ is the acoustic wavelength.
The directional factor of the array of transducer elements is given by [Kinsler et al., 1982]:
d
sin( Nπ sin θ)
h array (θ) = λ (3. 25)
d
N ⋅ sin( π sin θ)
λ
Product theorem – is a law of acoustics which defines the directional factor of an array of N transducer
elements as the product of the directional factor of the transducer element by the directional factor of the
array, i.e.
h (θ) = h e (θ) ⋅ h array (θ) (3. 26)
and the pressure amplitude is given by:
P(r, θ, φ) = Pax (r ) ⋅ h e (θ, φ) ⋅ h array (θ, φ) . (3. 27)
M-13
138
Directional Factor
0,9
0,8
0,7
0,6
h(θ)
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
-90 -75 -60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60 75 90
Angle (º)
Fig. 3.10 "Directional factor"
Fig. 3.11 "Beam pattern of a beam perpendicular to the transducer face"
M-13
139
For a linear element, the directional factor is:
L
sin( π sin θ)
h linear (θ) = λ (3. 28)
L
π sin θ
λ
The directional factor for an array is only valid for the far field, i.e. in the area where two waves
generated by a central and an outer element from the same array have a phase difference smaller than 180
degrees.
2
⎛L⎞
k R + ⎜ ⎟ − kR ≤ π
2
(3. 29)
⎝2⎠
where k is the wave number, i.e. k = 2π/λ.
For instance, for a frequency of 100 kHz and a linear transducer array with L = 0.5 m, the far field
corresponds to distances greater than 4.0 metres. This is usually the restriction for the minimum depth
measurement.
In the near field, interfering processes create a more complex representation of the acoustic pressure.
The transducer or transducer array beam axis is normal to the transducer face. To form beams not normal
to the face of the array, it is necessary to steer the beam. This process is achieved through beam steering
techniques.
One array with N omni directional elements may steer a beam by introducing a phase or time delay in
each element. The corresponding directional factor is (Figure 3.12):
⎡ d ⎤
sin ⎢ Nπ (sin θ − sin θ ax )⎥
⎣ λ ⎦
h array (θ) = (3. 30)
⎡ d ⎤
N ⋅ sin ⎢π (sin θ − sin θ ax )⎥
⎣ λ ⎦
The result of this equation is the beam axis steered to the direction θax (Figure 3.13)
Beam steering can be accomplished by introducing a time delay or phase difference to the elements of the
array (equation 3.31).
Beam steering has two aims: beam stabilization and beam forming during the reception phase.
M-13
140
Directional Factor
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
h(θ )
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-90 -75 -60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60 75 90
Angle (º)
Fig. 3.12 "Directional factor of a beam steered 30 degrees"
Fig. 3.13 "Beam pattern of a beam steered 30 degrees"
M-13
141
For beam stabilization, it is necessary to measure the angle referred to the normal direction to the array,
being the time delay obtained from:
nd
Δt n = sin(θ ax ) (3. 31)
c
During beam forming, the signals from each element of the array are copied for each beam, the time delay
applied to one element from a particular channel or beam is:
nd
Δt n , i = sin(θ ax i ) (3. 32)
c
where i is the order of the beam and n is the number of the transducer element.
Considering two dimensionless elements transmitting a pulse with the same frequency but with a time
delay, the acoustical axis is steered to the direction where the wave fronts, coming from the two elements,
arrive at the same time (Figure 3.14).
Fig. 3.14 "Illustration of a beam steered θax with two transducer elements."
The beam width, usually defined at the -3 dB level, increases with the steering angle, i.e.
λ
b Wi = 50 (degrees) (3. 33)
(N − 1)d ⋅ cos(θ ax i )
Due to the beam’s conical shape, when steered, its intersection with the plane of an assumed flat seabed
results in a hyperbolic footprint (Figure 3.15).
M-13
142
(a) (b)
Fig. 3.15 "Linear (a) and hyperbolic (b) footprint."
Side lobes have undesirable effects, such as the detection of echoes corresponding to those lobes. This is
the general case for MBES using large beam angles where the erroneous detection is made at the nadir or
in the case of rocky spots (Figure 3.16). This effect results in wavy bathymetric contours which
sometimes can be identified as an “omega” shape. Lobe reduction is vital for the successful operation of
MBES; it is achieved using shading functions, applied during echo reception, corresponding to variable
gain applied to the transducer elements.
Considering all transducer elements with the same amplitude, the side lobes will have approximately -13
dB. The technique used to reduce the side lobes consists of superimposing a window, which amplifies the
signals from different elements with different gains. These windows are usually symmetric to the centre
of the array.
The Dolph-Chebychev window is quite often used; this window has the advantage of optimising the level
of the side lobes for particular beam widths; it produces the same amplitude level for all side lobes.
The disadvantage of windows superimposition is the resultant reduction of the directivity.
M-13
143
Fig. 3.16 "Depth measurement corresponding to side lobes producing

both incorrect depth determination and positioning."
4.3 Classification with Regard to Beam
Echo sounders can be divided into single beam and multibeam. SBES may have transducers either with a
single transducer piece or an array. MBES have transducer arrays built up from several elements. As
mentioned before, this is a result of the need for beam forming in multiple directions and, sometimes,
beam steering to compensate for platform attitude.
4.3.1 Single beam
Single beams require only a transducer, for both transmission and reception, but a transducer array may
be used particularly when stabilization is required. Knowledge of roll and pitch angles are needed for
beam stabilization.
Beam width is a function of the transducer dimensions and acoustic wave length. The higher the
frequency and the larger the transducer is, the narrower the beam will be. Thus to have a narrow beam in
low frequencies, a large transducer is required.
The transducer selected for SBES may have a narrow beam when high directivity is required or a wide
beam when directivity is not the main concern but the detection of minimum depths or obstacles on the
seafloor is the priority.
M-13
144
Wide beams have the capacity to detect echoes within a large solid angle, which is useful for the detection
of hazards to navigation requiring further investigation. These beams are usually not stabilized, for
common sea conditions the attitude of the transducer does not impact on the measurements.
On the other hand, narrow beams, typically 2º to 5º, are usually required for high resolution mapping
(Figure 3.17). These beams might be stabilized in order to measure the depth vertically below the
transducer.
0.00 Echogram 69.00

20
22
24
Depth (m)
26
Narrow beam
Wide beam
Bottom
28
30
Fig. 3.17 "Illustration of depth measurement using a single narrow- and wide-beam.”
4.3.2 Multibeam
MBES usually have separated transducer arrays for transmission and reception, i.e. one projector and one
hydrophone, where the first is oriented longitudinally and the second is oriented transversally to the
vessel’s bow. The most common is to have only one transmitted beam with a fan shape, narrow along
track and broad across track.
The reception transducer forms several beams, in predefined directions, narrow across track and broad
along track, guaranteeing, regardless of the attitude of the surveying platform, intersection between the
transmission and the reception beams.
The reduction of side lobes is essential for correct depth measurement and positioning of MBES. It is
common to have side lobes below -20 dB.
4.4 Classification with Regard to Installation
The installation of the transducers on board the survey vessel can be undertaken in several ways. The
decision on the way in which the transducer should be installed depends on system portability, keeping it
free from vessel noise sources, including turbulent water flow under the keel, and the need to lower it
M-13
145
close to the sea floor. The transducer installation can be keel mounted, towed or portable. Each of these
is described in the following paragraphs.
4.4.1 Keel mounted
This is the common installation for single beam and multibeam transducers in large vessels, particularly
for those designed for deep water surveys.
The installation on the keel can be optionally chosen from:
4.4.1.1 Flush mounted – the transducer is mounted with the face in the hull plane. This option is used
either in single beam or multibeam transducers. The advantage is that it does not require a special
structure for the installation; the disadvantage may be the vessel noise.
4.4.1.2 Blister – the transducer is mounted in a structure with a small hull shape. This option is used for
both single and multibeam transducers. The advantage is the reduction in hull water flow effect at
the transducers face; the disadvantage is the need for a special structure for the installation.
4.4.1.3 Gondola - the transducer is mounted in a special gondola shaped structure (Figure 3.18). This
option is used for multibeam transducers, particularly for deep water operation. The advantages
are the reduction of vessel noise and the elimination of hull water flow noise at the transducer
face as it passes in between the hull and the gondola; the disadvantages are the need for a special
structure for the installation and consequently an increase in the vessel’s draught of the order of a
metre.
4.4.2 Towed
The transducer installation in a towed fish is used for side scan sonars when it is essential to have good
stability of the transducer, reduction of vessel noise and the ability to lower the transducer close to the
seabed.
4.4.3 Portable
This method of installation is commonly used either on single beam and multibeam transducers in small
vessels, specifically aimed at shallow water surveys. This installation can be achieved either on the side
or over the bow (Figure 3.19) of the vessel. The support structure for the transducer should be rigid and
resistant to torque.
M-13
146
Fig. 3.18 "Gondola installation"
Fig. 3.19 "Transducer installation over the bow"
M-13
147
4.5 Coverage
The seafloor coverage, i.e. the ensonified area by SBES, is the area within the beam, where the footprint
size is given by (Figure 3.20):
⎛φ⎞
a = 2 ⋅ z ⋅ tan⎜ ⎟ (3. 34)
⎝2⎠
φ
z 2
Fig. 3.20 "Single beam coverage"
For multibeam echo sounders, the ensonified area is the result of the intersection of the transmitted and
received beam patterns and is dependent upon beam pointing angle, beam width, depth and mean slope of
the seafloor. The ensonified area for each beam can be approximated by an ellipse. Taking a flat and
levelled seafloor, the length of this ellipse in the athwart ships direction is approximately given by ay,
2z ⎛φ ⎞
ay = tan⎜ R ⎟ (3. 35)
cos (β ) ⎝ 2 ⎠
2
where z is the mean depth, β is the beam pointing angle and φR is the width of the reception beam in the
athwart ships direction. In the presence of a slope, defined by an angleζ, the length of the acoustic
footprint is approximately:
2z ⎛φ ⎞
ay = tan⎜ R ⎟ (3. 36)
cos(β )cos(β − ζ ) ⎝ 2 ⎠
The width or dimension of the footprint ellipse in the fore-aft direction, for a flat seafloor, is
approximately given by ax,
M-13
148
2z ⎛φ ⎞
ax = tan⎜ T ⎟ (3. 37)
cos(β ) ⎝ 2 ⎠
where φT is the width of the transmitted beam.
The coverage of the seafloor is a function of the dimension of the ensonified areas, beam spacing across-
track, ping rate, ship’s speed, yaw, pitch and roll. In order to achieve full coverage of the seafloor, the
ensonified areas from consecutive pings must overlap one another, so that every single point on the
seafloor is ensonified, at least, by one acoustic pulse.
The width of the swath for a flat seafloor is given by,
⎛ Δθ ⎞
S w = 2z ⋅ tan⎜ ⎟ (3. 38)
⎝ 2 ⎠
where Δθ is the angular coverage between the outer beams of the MBES, effectively used for
hydrographic purposes.
5. ACOUSTIC SYSTEMS
In this section, the acoustic systems applied in hydrographic surveying are described. These systems are
divided according to their ability to cover the seafloor, i.e. SBES and swath systems, either multibeam or
interferometric sonar43.
5.1 Single beam echo sounders
These echo sounders are devices for depth determination by measuring the time interval between the
emission of a sonic or ultrasonic pulse and the return of its echo from the seabed.
Traditionally, the main purpose of the echo sounder is to produce a consistent and high resolution vertical
seabed profile on echo trace. The echo trace, after a cautious interpretation, is sampled and digitized
manually to produce soundings.
During the last decade, the technology applied in SBES has progressively improved with automatic
digitisers, recorders without moving parts and annotation of positions on the echo trace. Recently, built-
in computers and signal processors have allowed more sophisticated real time signal processing and data
presentation on graphical colour displays, rather than a paper recorder.
5.1.1 Principles of operation
An echo sounder works by converting electrical energy, from the pulse generator, into acoustic energy.
As the transducers do not transmit in all directions, the acoustic energy is projected into the water in the
form of a vertically oriented beam.
43
A system of determining distance of an underwater object by measuring the interval of time, between transmission of an
underwater sonic or ultrasonic signal and the echo return. The name sonar is derived from the words SOund NAvigation
and Ranging.
M-13
149
The acoustic pulse travels through the water column and hits the seabed. The interaction with the sea
floor results in reflection, transmission and scattering.
The reflected energy which returns to the transducer, the echo, is sensed by the transducer. The strength
of the echo decreases rapidly with time, for that reason the echo is automatically adjusted in accordance
with its energy level using the Automatic Gain Control (AGC) set in the factory and the Time Variable
Gain (TVG) to compensate for the echo’s decrease as a function of time. After amplification the electric
signal is passed to an envelope detector and compared to the threshold setting to filter the noise from the
signal. The output signal is then visualized or recorded.
The resultant observable is the time interval between pulse transmission and echo reception, t, being the
measured depth given by:
1
zm = ⋅t⋅c (3. 39)
2
where c is the mean sound velocity in the water column.
5.1.1.1 Echo sounder parameters need to be set correctly in order to obtain high accuracy and a clear
record of the seabed. The most important parameters are:
a) Power – The operating range of the echo sounder depends on pulse length, frequency and
transmitted power. To optimize the use of the echo sounder, the transmitted power should be
kept at the lowest values consummate with adequate detection. Increases in power will result
in high levels of echoes but also in higher reverberation levels, creating a poor record. The
power is limited by cavitation44 phenomenon and by the braking stress of the transducer
material.
b) Gain – The gain entails signal amplification. The amplification of the signal also amplifies
the noise and consequently the data record may be confused. It is recommended that the gain
is adjusted according to the seabed type and to the transmission power.
c) Register intensity – This parameter is used in analogue echo sounders to adjust the recording
intensity.
d) Pulse length – The pulse length is usually selected automatically as a function of the
operating range. The pulse length is responsible for the vertical resolution of the echo
sounder, short pulses are necessary for a better resolution. It may be necessary to increase the
pulse length in areas with poor reflectivity or with steep slopes.
In shallow waters, where resolution is more important, short pulses must be used. This will
reduce the probability of false echoes due to strong reverberation.
e) Scale – Corresponds to the depth scale of the echo sounder recording window. The width of
the recording paper is fixed; therefore at small scales one will have a low vertical resolution.
44
This corresponds to the production of small voids in the water. This phenomenon occurs when the acoustic pressure
exceeds the hydrostatic pressure.
M-13
150
f) Phase scale – The phase scale is one way to overcome limitations of the recording resolution
imposed by the echo trace scale. The phase scale consists of recording just one depth
window which should be changed, either manually or automatically, to maintain the seabed
recording with a satisfactory vertical resolution no matter the water depth (Figure 3.21).
g) Draught – This parameter corresponds to the immersion of the transducer; in order to record
the depth with reference to the instantaneous water level, the draught should be set and
verified before survey operations commence and regularly thereafter.
h) Paper’s speed – This speed is particularly important and should be selected to ensure good
horizontal resolution from depth measurements.
i) Sound velocity – This is the nominal value of sound velocity that should correspond to the
mean sound velocity in the area of operation. In surveys with more demanding accuracies,
the sound velocity may be set to the sound velocity at the transducer face or to 1500 m/s and
then during data processing, the depth must be corrected by applying the actual sound
velocity profile.
In classical analogue echo sounders, this parameter does not correspond to the sound velocity
but to the value that calibrates the mechanical and electrical echo sounder components to
measure the correct water depth.
0.00 25.00 Echogram 50.00

10 20
15 25
Depth (m)
20 30
Phase 10-30 m
Phase 20-40 m
25 35
30 40
Fig. 3.21 "Recording scales"
The general working principles of SBES were referred to above. However, it is possible to identify two
types of echo sounders, digital or analogue.
The traditional analogue echo sounder, whose diagram is presented in Figure 3.22, begins the cycle with
the generation of an electrical pulse and the transmission of a burst of energy into the water. After the
M-13
151
echo reception and conversion into electrical energy, the low voltage signal is pre-amplified and passed to
a recording amplifier, in order to be recorded on an echo trace, which is a graphic record of depth
measurements obtained by an echo sounder with adequate vertical and horizontal resolutions. After the
recording phase is completed, it is possible to initiate another cycle.
Paper Record
Triggering Stage
Recording Amplifier
Power Stage
Preamplifier
Transducer
Fig. 3.22 "Analogue echo sounder – block diagram"
Hydrographic echo sounders for shallow waters are usually built with two channels (low and high
frequency). The simultaneous recording of two frequencies allows the separation of the seabed return
from the soft surface sediments and the underlying rock due to their different acoustic impedances.
The digital echo sounder, see Figure 3.23, works in a similar manner to the analogue echo sounder for the
signal transmission. However, during the echo reception, the received signal is amplified as a function of
time (time varying gain) and passed through an envelope detector where it is finally converted to digital
format, which is the signal that is processed to determine the depth. This allows the information to be
stored and displayed in several formats.
5.1.12 Accuracy in the depth measurement is a function of several factors, the echo sounder itself and the
medium. Usually, it is necessary to calculate the error budget based on those factors (see 5.1.4).
5.1.1.3 Resolution is the ability to separate returns from two or more objects close together; it is generally
expressed as the minimum distance between two objects that can be separated. In depth
measurement, a major concern is the vertical resolution of the echo sounder which is dependent
on:
M-13
152
a) pulse length - larger pulses have smaller resolution (see 2.4.3). Two objects inside a narrow
beam will be recorded as a signal target if they are less than half a pulse length apart; they
will be resolved as two separate echoes if they are more than half a pulse length apart;
b) sensitivity and resolution of the recording medium;
c) transmit beam width.
Data Output
(Display, Printer, Logging)
Microprocessor
Analogue to Digital
Amplifier Envelope Detector
Time Varying Gain
Transducer
Fig. 3.23 "Digital echo sounder – block diagram"
5.1.1.4 Frequency of an echo sounder is selected based on the intended use of the equipment, i.e. the
depth ranges. In some cases it is desirable to use the same device in several depths, for that
purpose echo sounders may have more than one frequency and transducer in order to improve the
data acquisition and data quality.
The frequencies are often allocated to channels. The echo sounders with two channels are mainly
used in shallow and coastal waters; for deep waters, it is usual to use a single low frequency.
5.1.2 Installation and calibration
The transducer may be fixed under the hull or mounted on the side or over the bow. The relevant
considerations are that the transducer should be placed, as far as possible, away from the vessel’s own
sources of noise, deep enough to avoid the surface noise and to stay submerged even in rough seas. It is
M-13
153
also very important that the transducer is securely fixed and vertically orientated. It is desirable for the
heave compensator and the positioning antenna to be located in the same vertical axis as the transducer.
Echo sounder calibration is a routine task which consists of adjusting the equipment to ensure correct
depth measurement. The calibration can be conducted with a bar check or with a special transducer. The
purpose is to set the sound velocity parameter so as to adjust the mechanical and electrical components. It
may also be possible to correct the measured depths during post processing with the application of the
sound velocity profile.
In shallow waters, echo sounder calibration for the average sound velocity in the water column may be
performed in the following ways:
a) Bar check consists of lowering a bar or plate underneath the transducer at several depths (for
instance, every two metres) either recording the depth error to apply afterwards during the
data processing or forcing the echo sounder to record the correct depth from the bar or plate
through the adjustment of the sound velocity parameter (Figure 3.24). In such cases the value
adopted for calibration is the mean value of the observations. This method should be used
down to 20-30 metres.
b) Calibration transducer is an apparatus designed to perform the calibration knowing an exact

path length. The calibration procedure consists of making the echo sounder record the correct
two-way path inside the calibration transducer by the adjustment of the sound velocity
parameter. The calibration transducer is lowered to several depths, each adjustment of the
echo sounder, due to the performed measurement, is only valid for the corresponding depth.
The calibration value used should be the mean of all the observations. This method should be
used down to 20-30 metres.
0.00 322.00
Echogram
0
1507
2
Bar check
1506
4
Average "sound speed" = 1505 m/s
1505
Depth (m)
1505
8
1504
10
1505
12
14
Fig. 3.24 "Bar check illustration"
M-13
154
c) A combined method may also be used with a calibration transducer and a sound velocity
profiler. This method is usually used for depths greater than those detailed above. With a
sound velocity profile and the adjustment of the true sound velocity at the transducer draft, a
similar procedure to that described in b) above is followed. In more modern echo sounders,
the sound velocity parameter is set to the actual sound velocity.
The depth correction is computed during data processing, with the assumption that data was
collected using the true sound velocity at the transducer draft. The depth correction is based
on the difference between the sound velocity used during data collection and the harmonic
mean sound velocity computed from the sound velocity profile.
For depths greater than 200 metres, it is not required to correct the measured depths for sound velocity, a
standard sound velocity of 1500 m/s is usually used or values may be selected from the Mathews Tables
(N.P. 139).
5.1.3 Operation and data recording
Operation of individual echo sounders should be referred to their operator’s manual. Nevertheless, it is
important to stress the following aspects:
• Prior to the start of the survey it is necessary to calibrate the echo sounder for the actual
sound velocity;
• A general scale, adequate for the expected depths, should be selected;
• The frequency channel should be chosen according to their range capability;
• When using an analogue echo sounder, it is essential to set the gain and the recording
intensity to produce a legible trace.
5.1.4 Sources of errors and quality control techniques
Errors in depth determination can be divided into three categories: large errors (blunders), systematic
errors and random errors.
Blunder is the terminology used to define errors made by machines; these are caused by defective
mechanical or electronic components.
Systematic errors are mainly the result of the offsets (fixed errors) or biases (errors that vary under
different conditions) in motion sensing of the survey vessel, misalignment of the transducer and other
sensor mounting angles. These errors can be easily corrected if the sign and size of the systematic error
can be identified. This category of errors can be determined and removed during calibration of the
system.
After removing blunders and systematic errors in the depth data, random errors will remain and these can
be analysed using statistical techniques.
Hydrographers should be aware of the sources which contribute to the depth error and their individual
impact. This section identifies several sources of errors and presents the usual techniques used for quality
control.
M-13
155
5.1.4.1 Due to bottom slope - Taking into consideration the different seafloor slopes, in Figure 3.25, the
error on the depth measurement, dz, depends on both beam width and slope. If no correction is
applied, the error in depth will be given by:
⎧ φ
⎪z m (sec(ζ ) − 1) if ζ < 2
⎪
dz = ⎨ (3. 40)
⎪z ⎛⎜ sec⎛⎜ φ ⎞⎟ − 1⎞⎟ if ζ > φ
⎪⎩ m ⎝ ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎠ 2
φ
where is half beam width and ζ is the slope of the seafloor.
2
ζ<φ ζ>φ
z = zm⋅ cos (ζ)

z = zm⋅cos (φ/2)
zN ζ zN
φ/2
φ/2 zm
zm
ζ
ζ
x = zm⋅ sin (ζ) x = zm⋅ sin (φ/2)
a) slope less than one half the beam width b) slope greater than one half the beam width
Fig. 3.25 "Effect of beam width and seafloor slope on depth measurement and positioning"
5.1.4.2 Due to sound velocity. Sound velocity variation is difficult to monitor and produces, in single
beam echo sounders, errors in the depth measurement (dzm), proportional to the mean sound
velocity error or variation (dc) and to the depth
1
dz c = ⋅ t ⋅ dc (3. 41)
2
or
dc
dz c = z ⋅ (3. 42)
c
M-13
156
The magnitude of the sound velocity error varies with:
a) accuracy of sound velocity determination;

b) temporal variation of sound velocity;
c) spatial variation of sound velocity.
2
Note that the depth variance, σ z c , due to sound velocity measurement error and to sound velocity
variation is written as,
( )
2
2 ⎛z⎞ 2
σ zc = ⎜ ⎟ σ c m + σ c2 (3. 43)
⎝c⎠
2
where σ c m is the sound velocity measurement variance and σ c2 is the sound velocity variance
due to spatial and temporal variations.
Sound velocity variation, temporal and spatial, is a major external contribution to depth
measurement errors. It is important, that during survey planning or at the beginning of the
survey, to carry out a number of sound velocity measurements or sound velocity profiles across
the survey area distributed throughout the day to assist the hydrographer in deciding on the
frequency and location of profiles to be conducted within the survey area during data gathering
operations.
5.1.4.3 Due to time measurement. An echo sounder effectively measures time, converting the
measurement to depth. The error in time measurement, dt, relates directly to depth error, dzt. In
modern echo sounders, time measurement error is usually small and constant. This error is also
taken into consideration during calibration.
1
dz t = c ⋅ dt (3. 44)
2
The major error is a function of identification of the measurement point within the echo, i.e. on
the algorithms used for signal detection.
Note that the depth variance, σ 2tm , due to time measurement error is written as,
2
2 ⎛1 ⎞ 2
σ zt = ⎜ c⎟ σt m (3. 45)
⎝2 ⎠
2
where σ t m is the time measurement variance.
5.1.4.4 Due to roll, pitch, and heave. Roll and pitch contribute to the error in depth measurement when
φ
the magnitude of those angles is greater than one half the beam widths, 2 . Figure 3.26 depicts
the error in depth measurement and in positioning due to roll, θR; this figure can be adapted for
pitch changing θR by θP.
M-13
157
z = zm⋅ cos (θR-φ/2)
zm θR
φ
φ
θR − 2
2
x = zm⋅ sin (θR-φ/2)
Fig. 3.26 "Effect of beam width and seafloor slope on depth

measurement and positioning"
Wide beam echo sounders are usually immune to the roll and pitch of the survey vessel.
For narrow beam echo sounders, this effect may be compensated with beam stabilisation, i.e.
keeping the beam vertical regardless of the vessel’s attitude or correcting the measured depth and
position as follows:
⎧ ⎛ ⎛ φ ⎞⎞ φ
⎪z m ⎜⎜1 − sec⎜ θ R − ⎟ ⎟⎟ if θ R >
⎪ ⎝ 2 ⎠⎠ 2
dz roll =⎨ ⎝ (3. 46)
⎪ φ
⎪⎩ 0 if θ R <
2
The heave (h), effect caused by the action of sea and swell on the survey vessel, is measured with
inertial sensors or heave compensators. The heave compensator should be placed over the
transducer to measure the heave in the same vertical axis.
When using inertial sensors, installation should be close to the centre of gravity of the survey
vessel with the known lever arms from the centre of gravity to the transducer; with the roll and
pitch instantaneous angles, the measured heave, hm, can be transferred to the transducer position,
ht, through the application of the induced heave, hi, (Figure 3.27).
ht = hm + hi (3. 47)
M-13
158
To calculate the induced heave, consider the vessel to be a rigid body which is free to rotate
around the three axes (x, y & z) as mentioned in 3. The rotation about the centre of gravity (roll
and pitch), near which heave is usually measured, corresponds to a transducer depth variation,
from the vessel reference frame (identified with the script V) to a local co-ordinate system
(identified with the script L). This difference is called induced heave.
The induced heave, adapted from Hare [1995] for the reference frames defined in 3 and Annex A,
is given by:
h i = z Lt - z Vt = −x Vt sin(θ P ) + y Vt cos(θ P )sin(θ R ) + z Vt (cos(θ P )cos(θ R ) − 1) (3. 48)
where θR is the roll angle, θP is the pitch angle and (xt, yt & zt) are the transducer co-ordinates.
The total error on the depth measurement due to heave is therefore,
dh = dh m + dh i (3. 49)
where dhm is the error in heave measurement and dhi is the error in the induced heave
determination.
xt θR
yt
zt
u
θP
Induced heave
Transducer
Fig. 3.27 "Induced heave"
Note that the induced heave variance is dependent upon the accuracy of the transducer offsets
from the motion sensor and from the accuracy of the roll and pitch angles [Hare, 1995].
The total heave variance corresponds to the depth variance, σ 2h , i.e.
2 2
σ 2h = σ h m + σ h i (3. 50)
M-13
159
2 2
where σ h m is the heave measurement variance and σ h i is the induced heave variance. This later
error is typically negligible when compared to the heave measurement error.
When no heave compensator is available, it is possible manually to smooth the data in the echo
trace. This task requires considerable experience in the interpretation of the echo trace in order to
preserve seafloor features. The general procedure, in non significant roll conditions, is that the
echo trace should be smoothed half way between crests and troughs (Figure 3.28).
5 Echogram
10
Echo trace
15
Manual heave filtering
Depth (m)
20
25
30
Fig. 3.28 "Manual heave filtering"
5.1.4.5 Due to draught, settlement, squat and relative position of transducer. The accurate measurement
of the transducer draught is fundamental to the accuracy of the total depth. Even so it is generally
necessary to update that value during the survey. The reasons for the draught variation are mainly
due to the fuel and water consumption. The draught variation, for the same displacement,
increases with the decrease of the float area at the sea surface. The draught error propagates
directly as a depth error, dzdraught.
Settlement is the general lowering in level of a moving vessel, relative to its motionless state
level. This effect, particularly noticeable in shallow waters, is due to the regional depression of
the surface of the water in which the vessel moves. The depth error due to settlement is referred
to dzsettlement.
M-13
160
Squat is another effect that takes place under dynamic conditions, the change in level of the bow
and stern from the rest condition in response to the elevation and depression of the water level
about the hull resulting from the bow and stern wave systems. In surveying vessels where the
change in squat is significant, it is usually computed in a table of squat versus vessel speed. The
depth error due to squat is referred to dzsquat.
The relative position of the transducer from the motion sensor or heave compensator needs to be
taken into consideration to correct the measured depth for induced heave, see 5.1.4.4.
The total error due to transducer position to the water line, dzi is:
dz i = dz draught
2
+ dz settlement
2
+ dz squat
2
(3. 51)
Note that the total depth variance due to transducer immersion is written as:
σ i2 = σ draught
2
+ σ settlement
2
+ σ squat
2
(3. 52)
2 2 2
where σ draught is the draught variance, σ settlement is the settlement variance and σ squat is the squat
variance.
5.1.4.6 Record reading and resolution. The record reading and resolution for depth measurement is
dependent on the operating principles of the echo sounder. In the case of analogue recording, the
operator should select appropriate echo sounder parameters during survey operations in order to
have, as far as possible, a clean echo trace and adequate resolution. On the other hand, the digital
record no longer has such a degree of dependence on the operator during the survey but
supervision is required during data acquisition.
When the data is recorded on paper, it is necessary to select the gain and intensity for a legible
record; it is also necessary to have a vertical scale with sufficient discrimination. It is common to
use scale phases for that reason (see 5.1.1.1).
The echo trace should be prepared for reading; this task consists of identifying the points on the
seabed that will be selected for depth reading. This is usually performed with the aid of a
digitising table.
The error associated with record reading depends on the experience and care of the hydrographer.
Consider a paper record width of 20 centimetres and scale 0-200 metres, an error reading of 0.5
mm will produce an error in the depth of 0.5 metres. Therefore, this scale is not adequate for
depth recording in shallow waters. The reading error is referred to dzread, with variance σ 2r .
5.1.4.7 Interpretation of the echo trace is a hydrographer’s responsibility. The interpretation requires
experience to identify particular shapes, multiple echoes and false echoes.
a) False echoes – are caused by foreign matter such as kelp or fish in the water column (Figure
3.29), by layers of water separated by sudden changes of temperature or salinity or both.
M-13
161
False echoes are occasionally recorded by echo sounders and might be interpreted erroneously as
correct depths. In cases of doubt over the validity of measured depths, an investigation of that
sounding should be performed and the particular part of the survey line re-run if necessary.
0.00 Echogram
0
5
False echoes
fish kelp
Depth (m)
10
15
20
Fig. 3.29 "False echoes"
b) Multiple echoes – are echoes received subsequent to the very first one due to a multiplicity
of reflections back and forth between the seafloor and the surface. These reflections are often
recorded as multiples of the first depth (Figure 3.30).
M-13
162
0.00 69.00
Echogram
0
10
15
Depth (m)
20
25
First echo
30
Multiple echo
35
40
Fig. 3.30 "Multiple echoes record"
c) Heave - the oscillatory rise and fall of a vessel due to the entire hull being lifted by the force
of the sea, may be compensated during acquisition by a heave sensor or may be filtered
manually afterwards. The hydrographer’s experience is the tool used for that purpose, even
though; it is sometimes difficult to differentiate the heave in an irregular seabed.
d) Side echoes – are also false echoes but they are the result of echo detection in the side lobes
which results in errors in depth measurement and positioning (see 4.2).
e) Unconsolidated sediments – are usually detected by high frequency echo sounders. In

shallow waters, it is recommended that two frequencies are used at the same time to
differentiate soft sediments from the bed rock (Figure 3.31).
5.1.4.8 Depth reduction. The measured depths, corrected for the attitude of the surveying vessel, are
reduced to the vertical datum by the application of the tide. The depth error due to tide error
measurement is referred to dztide.
In addition to the error in tide measurement, sometimes a more significant error is the co-tidal
correction which results from the difference of the actual tide in the survey area and in the tide
gauge. The depth error from co-tidal error is dzco-tidal. This may be quite significant several
miles away from the tide gauge (see Chapter 4). A co-tidal model or weighted averages from two
or more tide gauges may be required.
M-13
163
0.00 Echogram 70.00

0
10
Depth (m)
15
High frequency
20
Low frequency
25
Fig. 3.31 "Dual channel recording"
Note that the tide variance, σ 2tide , due to measurement error and co-tidal variation is written as,
( 2
σ 2tide = σ tide m + σ co
2
− tidal ) (3. 53)
2 2
where σ tide m is the tide measurement variance and σ co − tidal is the co-tidal component variance.
The tide determination using GPS-RTK (Real Time Kinematic) will provide accurate local tide
determination, however, the tidal computation requires a model of the differences between the
reference ellipsoid, the WGS84, and the vertical datum.
The quality control is performed by statistical calculations based on the comparison of soundings
from the check lines against neighbouring soundings from the survey lines. The statistical results
of the comparison should comply with the accuracy recommendations in the S-44 (Figure 3.32).
According to the errors presented above, the estimated reduced depth variance is written as
follows,
2 2
σ 2z = σ z c + σ z t + σ 2h + σ i2 + σ 2r + σ 2tide . (3. 54)
The estimated error on the reduced depth, at the 68 percent (or 1σ) confidence level, is obtained
by the square-root of equation 3.54. Assuming that the component errors follow approximately a
normal distribution, the estimated error on the reduced depth, at the 95 percent (or 2σ) confidence
level, is obtained by substituting each variance σ 2 with (2σ )2 .
M-13
164
1.6
Special Order Survey
1.4 1st Order Survey
2nd Order Survey
1.2
Maximum Error (m)
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Depth (m)
Fig. 3.32 "Minimum depth accuracy requirements for Special Order, Order 1 and Order 2 (S-44)"
For each surveying system it is recommended an error budget is created to assess compliance
with the S-44 requirements. Figure 3.33 represents the error estimation for a particular echo
sounder and operating conditions.
M-13
165
Echo sounder Characteristics: Operating Conditions:

Frequency = 200 kHz Mean sound speed = 1500 m/s
Beam width = 20º (β = 10º) Heave = 1 m
Pulse duration = 0.1 ms Roll = 5º
Vessel speed = 8 knots
Settlement = N/A
Squat = 0.05 m
Estimated errors (2 σ):

Estimated or standard errors (1 σ): (95% confidence level)
Draft error = 0.05 m Draft error = 0.10 m

Sound speed variation = 5 m/s Sound speed variation = 10 m/s
Depth errors due to: Depth errors due to:
sound speed variation = (5/1500)z m sound speed variation = (1/150)z m
time measurement = 0.02 m time measurement = 0.04 m
squat = 0.05 m squat = 0.10 m
heave = 0.10 m heave = 0.10 m
tide error = 0.05 m tide error = 0.10 m
co-tidal error = 0.05 m co-tidal error = 0.10 m
2 2
σ z = σ z c + σ z t + σ i2 + σ h2 + σ r2 + σ 2tide .
0.8
1st Order Survey

0.7
Estimated error on reduced depth
Error (m) at 95% confidence level
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Depth (m)
Fig. 3.33 "Depth error estimation"
M-13
166
5.2 Swath Systems
Swath systems measure the depth in a strip of seafloor extending outwards from the sonar transducer.
These systems are arranged in a way that the profile, line where measurements are performed, lies at right
angles to the direction of survey vessel motion. As the vessel moves, the profiles sweep out a band on the
seafloor surface, known as a swath.
This section describes the multibeam systems and interferometric sonars.
5.2.1 Multibeam systems
MBES are a valuable tool for depth determination when full seafloor coverage is required. These systems
may allow complete seafloor ensonification with the consequent increase in resolution and detection
capability.
5.2.1.1 Principles of operation. Multibeam principle of operation is, in general, based on a fan shaped
transmission pulse directed towards the seafloor and, after the reflection of the acoustic energy by
the seabed; several beams are electronically formed, using signal processing techniques, with
known beam angles. The two-way travel time between transmission and reception is computed
by seabed detection algorithms. With the application of ray tracing (see 5.2.1.8.1), it is possible
to determine the depth and the transversal distance to the centre of the ensonified area.
The transmitted beam is wide across-track and narrow along-track; conversely, the beams formed
during reception are narrow across-track and wide along-track. The intersections of those beams
in the seafloor plan are the footprints (ensonified areas) for which the depths are measured.
Since depths are measured from a floating platform, with six possible degrees of freedom (three
translations and three rotations), for accurate computation of depth measurement and its
associated positioning, accurate measurements of latitude, longitude, heave, roll, pitch and
heading are required.
A. Bottom detection is the process used in MBES to determine the time of arrival and the amplitude
of the acoustic signal, representing a reflection from the seabed. The reliability of this process
affects the quality of the measurements. Depth blunders can be, among other factors, related to a
poor performance of the algorithms used for seabed detection. Seabed detection algorithms can
be categorized into two main divisions: amplitude detection and phase detection algorithms.
a) Amplitude detection. The transducer array emits an acoustic pulse towards the seabed
and then starts the listening period. In this phase, the returned signal is sampled in time
for each beam angle. The travel time of the signal for the correspondent depth point is
defined by the detected amplitude of the reflected signal (Figure 3.34).
The most common methods of amplitude detection are as follows:
i) Leading Edge of the Reflected Signal. This method is commonly used when the
angle of incidence of the acoustic signal to the seafloor is approximately zero
degrees. The bottom detection time is defined for the first arrival inside the beam
angle.
M-13
167
With the increasing angle of incidence, the returned signal loses its sharp form
(short rise time) and the leading edge method no longer performs well. Two
other methods can be employed, which take into account the variation of the
reflected signal strength samples across the beam footprint.
Bottom Detection
0 12.5
7.5
12.5
2.5
Amplitude
Phase
25
Zero crossing phase
-2.5
Centre of mass
Leading edge
37.5
-7.5
50 -12.5
Time
Fig. 3.34 "Bottom detection methods (signal detection)"
ii) Maximum Amplitude of the Reflected Signal. The bottom detection is defined
by the time of maximum backscatter amplitude.
iii) Centre of Mass of the Reflected Signal. This method consists of determining the
time corresponding to the centre of gravity of the amplitude signal.
b) Phase detection. Amplitude detection is the technique used for the inner beams (close to
nadir), where the backscatter amplitude has higher values and a smaller number of
samples. For the outer beams, the backscatter amplitude decreases and the number of
samples becomes very large. Consequently, the echo is so smeared out in time that
amplitude detection methods obtain poor results. Against a sloping seabed in the across-
track direction away from the source, the smear of the echo is also enhanced. Hence, the
phase detection method is commonly used for large angles of incident.
In this technique, the transducer array for each beam is divided into two sub-arrays, often
overlapping, with the centres of the sub-arrays a number of wavelengths apart. The
angular directions are pre-determined and each sub-array forms a beam in that direction,
the advantage being that in the case of the arrival of simultaneous echoes from different
directions, the MBES system resolves only the echoes in the direction of the formed
beam. The sequence of phase difference estimates are then used to estimate the time of
arrival of the echo in the pre-determined direction by finding the zero crossing of the
phase sequence [de Moustier, 1993]. Figure 3.35 depicts an example of the phase
M-13
168
detection method. The equivalent of the centre of the two sub-arrays are represented by
A and B at a distance l from each other, where θ is the angle of the received signal
measured from the acoustical axis. A second order polynomial may be fitted to a limited
sequence of differential phase estimates to refine the detection of the zero crossing phase.
When the signal return is from the acoustic axis direction, i.e. θ = 0, the signals at the two
sub-arrays are in phase, and this corresponds to the acoustic travel time.
Fig. 3.35 "Bottom detection methods by phase difference (zero crossing phase)"
Across the swath, a combination of amplitude and phase detection is usually required for
robust bottom detection. Near nadir, the amplitude detection should be used due to the
fact that the time series for these beams is too short for a robust phase detection.
Amplitude detection is also used in the case of steep slopes occurring well off-nadir,
associated with bathymetric heights, except for the extreme case of a seafloor that is
steeply sloping away from the transducer. Phase detection for the nadir beams is more
likely to be the result of a gross error (blunder) due to mid-water column returns or due to
higher returns from the side lobes. Off-nadir detections are better by phase, but
amplitude detection may be chosen when a higher return is caused by the difference of
the reflective properties of the target, by a near specula reflection or by a large variance
of the curve fit. These conditions may occur due to features such as wrecks and boulders.
M-13
169
B) Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)

According to 4.1, during beam forming the signals from each element of the array are copied for
each beam. The sum of the amplitude of the N transducer elements is itself a Fourier transform
of the vector, with N elements, corresponding to the radiation pattern of the linear array. If N is a
power of 2 the computation is less demanding and the Fourier transform is called Fast Fourier
Transform45. This method has the advantage to speed up the beam forming process.
Details on this method are addressed in de Moustier [1993].
5.2.1.1 Accuracy. Measurement of range and beam angle for multibeam systems is more complex than
for single beam echo sounders. Consequently, there are a number of factors that contribute to the
error in those measurements, including: beam angle, incident angle on the seafloor, transmit and
receive beam widths, attitude and heave accuracy, bottom detection algorithms and sound speed
profile variation.
It is usually necessary to calculate the error budget based on those factors (see 5.2.1.8.).
5.2.1.2 Resolution. Multibeam systems with their capability of full seafloor ensonification contribute to a
better seafloor representation and, when compared to SBES, to higher mapping resolution.
However, as far as the depth measurements are concerned, resolution will depend on the acoustic
frequency, transmit and receive beam widths and on the algorithm used to perform seabed
detection.
Resolution in depth measurement is a function of pulse length and of the dimensions of the
ensonified area. The ensonified area of MBES echo sounders, near normal incidence, is
relatively small, thus the resolution is higher than the single beam echo sounder.
5.2.1.3 Frequency of a MBES is selected based on the intended use of the equipment, basically depth
ranges and resolution.
The frequencies of the MBES are typically:
a. Waters shallower than 100 metres: frequencies higher than 200 kHz;
b. Waters shallower than 1500 metres: frequencies from 50 to 200 kHz;
c. Waters deeper than 1500 metres: frequencies from 12 to 50 kHz.
5.2.1.4 System associated sensors and integrity
Multibeam systems, besides the echo sounder itself, include:
a) motion sensor – for attitude (roll, pitch and heading) and heave measurement. Presently,
these sensors comprise an inertial measurement unit (IMU) and a pair of GPS receivers with
respective antennas. As a result of the technology involved this sensor is also capable of
providing positioning with high accuracy;
b) sound velocity profiler – to measure the sound velocity through the water column;
c) sound velocity probe – to measure the sound velocity at the transducer face. This should be
considered compulsory for flat arrays where beam steering is required;
45
It is still possible to apply the FFT even when N it is not a power of 2 by adding virtual elements with zero amplitude
(padded zeros), see de Moustier [1993].
M-13
170
d) Positioning system – as stated above, positioning in new technology systems is integrated

with motion sensors. GPS either in pseudo-differential mode or in Real Time Kinematic
mode (RTK) is the system commonly used worldwide;
e) Heading sensor – also integrated in motion sensors, the optimal and more accurate solution is
the heading obtained by GPS dual receivers.
5.2.1.5 Installation and calibration (patch test)
The installation of multibeam transducers can be either fixed to the hull, on the side or over the
bow. The hull installation is used in large vessels or when it is a permanent fixture, the other
installations are used for temporary short term purposes in small vessels.
The calibration or patch test is an essential procedure which consists of determining the
composite offset angles (roll, pitch and azimuth) for both transducer and motion sensor and the
latency from the positioning system. Detailed analysis and procedures may be found in Godin
[1996].
The calibration must be performed after the installation and either after long periods of
inoperability or after appreciable changes in the installation.
Before calibration it is necessary to check the installation parameters and to perform a sound
velocity profile to update the calculation of the refraction solution.
a) Positioning time delay
The time delay or latency is the time offset between depth measurement and positioning. The
procedure to determine the time offset consists of running two pairs of survey lines at
different speeds over a sloping seabed, the steeper the gradient the higher the resolution of
this parameter will be. The slope should be regular and with enough extension to guarantee
adequate sampling. Figure 3.36 illustrates the time delay calibration.
The time delay is obtained by measuring the longitudinal displacement of the soundings
along the slope due to the different speeds of the vessel. To avoid any influence from the
pitch offset the lines should be run on the same course.
The time delay, δt, may be obtained by the equation:
Δx
δt = (3. 55)
v 2 − v1
where Δx is the horizontal separation between the two sounding profiles near nadir, and v1
and v2 are the speeds of the vessel for line 1 and 2 respectively.
M-13
171
v1δt v2δt
Δx
a) b)
Fig. 3.36 "Time delay calibration.
a) Top view of the two lines;

b) Longitudinal section where the separation of the two
sounding profiles from the actual seafloor is visible. "
b) Pitch offset
The pitch offset is the composite angle offset from the inertial measurement unit and from the
transducer alignment with the local vertical in the longitudinal plane of the vessel. The
procedure to determine the pitch offset consists of running two pairs of reciprocal survey
lines at the same speed over a sloping seafloor, as mentioned in the time delay calibration, the
steeper the gradient the higher the resolution of this parameter will be. The slope should be
regular and with enough extension to guarantee adequate sampling. Figure 3.37 depicts the
pitch offset calibration.
After the correct determination of time delay, the pitch offset is obtained by measuring the
longitudinal displacement of the soundings along the slope due to the pitch offset. To avoid
any influence from time delay the system should already be compensated for positioning
latency.
The pitch offset, δθp, may be obtained by the equation:
⎛ Δx ⎞
δθ p = tan −1 ⎜ ⎟ (3. 56)
⎝ 2⋅z ⎠
where Δx is the horizontal separation between the two sounding profiles near nadir, and v1
and v2 are the speeds of the vessel for line 1 and 2 respectively.
M-13
172
z δθp
Δx
a) b)
Fig. 3.37 "Pitch offset calibration.
a) Top view of the two lines;

b) Longitudinal section where the separation of the two sounding
profiles from the actual seafloor due to pitch offset are visible."
c) Azimuthal offset
The azimuthal offset is the composite angle offset from the heading sensor and from the
transducer alignment perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis of the vessel. The procedure to
determine the azimuthal offset consists of running two adjacent pairs of reciprocal lines, at
the same speed, in an area with a well defined bathymetric feature such as a shoal. The
adjacent lines should overlap (not more than 20% the swath width) in the outer beams in the
location of the bathymetric feature. Figure 3.38 depicts the azimuthal offset calibration.
After the correct determination of time delay and pitch offset, the azimuthal offset is obtained
by measuring the longitudinal displacement of the bathymetric feature from adjacent lines.
To avoid any influence from time delay and pitch offset the system should already be
compensated for these offsets.
The azimuthal offset, δα, may be obtained by the equation:
⎛ Δx ⎞
δα = tan −1 ⎜ ⎟ (3. 57)
⎝ ΔL ⎠
where Δx is the horizontal separation from the bathymetric feature from the adjacent
reciprocal lines and ΔL is the distance between lines.
M-13
173
δα Δx
ΔL
Fig. 3.38 "Azimuthal offset calibration"
d) Roll offset
The roll offset is the composite angle offset from the inertial measurement unit and from the
transducer alignment with the local vertical in the transversal plane of the vessel. The
procedure to determine the roll offset consists of running a pair of reciprocal survey lines, at
the same speed, in a regular and flat seafloor. The lines should overlap each other. Figure
3.39 depicts the roll offset calibration.
After the correct determination of time delay, pitch and azimuthal offsets, the roll offset is
obtained by measuring the vertical displacement of the outer beams from the reciprocal lines.
To avoid any influence from time delay, pitch and azimuthal offsets the system should
already be compensated for these offsets.
The roll offset, δθR, may be obtained by the equation:
⎛ Δz ⎞
δθ R = tan −1 ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ (3. 58)
⎝ 2 ⋅ Δy ⎠
where Δz is the vertical displacement between outer beams from reciprocal lines and Δy is
half swath width or the distance from nadir to the point where vertical displacement is
measured.
M-13
174
Calibration is usually performed by interactive tools. The adjustment or offset calculation

should be done in several sampling sections in order to obtain an average. The offsets may
have an uncertainty of the order of the motion sensor repeatability.
δθR
2δθR Δz
Δy
a) b)
Fig. 3.39 "Roll offset calibration.
a) Top view of the two reciprocal lines;

b) Cross section where the pronounced separation of the sounding
profiles from nadir to the outer beams due to roll offset are visible."
5.2.1.7 Operation and data recording
Vessel configuration and calibration parameters should be checked at the beginning of the survey.
Some system parameters should also be checked. These are mainly the parameters used during
data acquisition and may vary with each survey’s location (e.g. maximum operating depth,
expected depth, maximum ping rate, etc.).
At the beginning of the survey a sound velocity profile should be performed and transferred to the
echo sounder to be used, generally, in real time. Sound velocity at the transducer face should be
compared with the value given from the sound velocity probe. During the survey session several
sound profile casts should be performed according to the pre-analysis of the temporal and spatial
variation of sound velocity.
Whilst surveying, the systems are almost completely automatic, the hydrographer should,
however, monitor the data acquisition and the data integrity. Full seafloor ensonification and
overlap with the adjacent swaths must be guaranteed and monitored. It is most important to
compare the overlapping outer beams of adjacent swaths and to check for any trend of curvature
upward or downward of each ping.
At the end of every survey session it is strongly recommended that a back up of the collected data
is created.
M-13
175
5.2.1.8 Sources of errors and quality control techniques
Sources of errors were discussed in 5.1.4 but these were for SBES. Hereafter the sources of
errors are analyzed for MBES, some of the errors are common to both systems, i.e. they do
not vary with beam angle. For this reason some of the errors are referred back to 5.1.4.
Further details on multibeam uncertainty can be found in Hare [1995] and Lurton [2002].
5.2.1.8.1 Due to sound velocity. Errors in sound velocity or in its variation result in incorrect
refraction solutions and, consequently, to errors in depth measurement and positioning.
The ray46 tracing is based on Snell’s law which states the relation between the ray direction
and the acoustic wave velocity:
sen θ 0 sen θ i
=L = =κ (3. 59)
c0 ci
where ci is the sound velocity, θi is the incidence angle referred to the vertical at the depth zi,
and κ is the ray parameter or Snell constant.
Assuming that the sound velocity profile is discrete (Figure 3.40), it is reasonable to assume
that the sound velocity gradient in a layer, between two measurements, is constant. Though,
the sound velocity is represented as follows:
c i (z) = c i −1 + g i (z − z i −1 ), for z i −1 ≤ z ≤ z i (3. 60)
where gi is the constant gradient at layer i, given by:
c i − c i −1
gi = (3. 61)
z i − z i −1
In each layer the acoustic pulse travels a path with constant radius of curvature, ρi, given by:
1
ρi = − (3. 62)
κg i
46
The acoustic ray corresponds to a line drawn from the source, in each point is perpendicular to the wave front.
M-13
176
Sound velocity profile Horizontal distance

z0 c0 x0
β=θ0
Layer 1
z1 c1 x1
z2 c2 θ1 x2
cn-1 xn-1
cn θn-1 xn
zn
Fig. 3.40 "Ray tracing"
Considering the launching angle θ0 (or β) in a depth with sound velocity c0, the horizontal
distance travelled by the acoustic pulse to cross the layer i is:
cos θ i −1 − cos θ i
Δx i = ρ i (cos θ i − cos θ i −1 ) = (3. 63)
κg i
1 − (κc i ) produces:
2
The replacement of cos(θi) by
1 − (κc i −1 ) − 1 − (κc i )
2 2
Δx i = (3. 64)
κg i
The travel time of the acoustic pulse in layer i, is obtained by:
ci
1 dc
Δt i =
gi ∫
c i −1
c ⋅ cos(θ )
(3. 65)
which can be written:
1 ⎛⎜ c i 1 + 1 − (κc i −1 ) ⎞
2
Δt i = ln ⎟ (3. 66)
g i ⎜ c i −1 1 + 1 − (κc )2 ⎟
⎝ i ⎠
To obtain the total horizontal distance travelled by the acoustic signal and the travel time, it is
necessary to sum the distances Δxi and the times Δti from the transducer to the seabed,
M-13
177
x=∑
[1 − (κc ) ] − [1 − (κc ) ]
n
i −1
2 1/ 2
i
2 1/ 2
(3. 67)
i =1 κg i
1 ⎛⎜ c i 1 + 1 − (κc i −1 ) ⎞
n 2
t = ∑ ln ⎟ (3. 68)
⎜c ⎟
i =1 g i
⎝ i −1 1 + 1 − (κc i )
2
⎠
Depth determination and sounding positioning are the result of the integration of the echo
along each direction, fixed by the beam pointing angle, using the updated sound velocity
profile between the transmission and one-way travel time (Δt/2).
Taking one sound velocity profile with constant gradient, g, the depth is obtained as:
Δt / 2
z= ∫ (c
0
0 + g ⋅ z) ⋅ cos(θ)dt (3. 69)
The depth error, dzc, due to the gradient variation, dg, and surface sound velocity variation,
dc0, by differentiation of equation 3.69 can be approximated by:
dz c =
z2
2c 0
(
1 − tan 2 (β ))dg + dc 0
z
c0
(3. 70)
where β and c0 are respectively the beam pointing angle and the sound velocity from the
sound velocity profile at the transducer face. In equation 3.70 the first term corresponds to
both the range and ray bending errors due to the variation of the profile gradient, whereas the
second term corresponds to depth error due to the sound velocity profile offset at the
transducer depth. Assuming there is no correlation of these errors, the depth variance due to
sound velocity errors is written as:
2 2
⎛ z2 ⎞ ⎛ z ⎞ 2
σ
2
z c_profile = ⎜⎜ ( )
⎟⎟ 1 − tan 2 (β ) σ g2 + ⎜⎜
2
⎟⎟ σ c0 (3. 71)
⎝ 2c 0 ⎠ ⎝ c0 ⎠
where σg corresponds to the variance of the gradient of the sound velocity profile and σc0
corresponds to the variance of the initial value of the sound velocity profile used for depth
calculation.
Sound velocity errors are, in practice, difficult to quantify and the problems with temporal
and spatial variations may sometimes be so significant that the only practical solution is to
limit multibeam angular coverage.
There is another error component due to sound velocity error or variation at the transducer
face; this component introduces an error on the beam pointing angle which also introduces
errors in depth measurement and positioning.
For beam steering or stabilization it is necessary to introduce time delays in the transducer
elements (4.2). To compute the delays it is necessary to know the sound velocity at the
M-13
178
transducer draught, this is usually achieved by a sound velocity sensor installed close to the
transducer. Any error in the sound velocity at the transducer face will be propagated as an
error in the beam pointing angle (Figure 3.41).
Fig. 3.41 "Beam steering error due to sound velocity variation"
The time delay to steer the beam the angle β, is obtained by:
d
Δt = sin (β ) (3. 72)
c0
hence:
⎛ c ⋅ Δt ⎞
β = asin ⎜ 0 ⎟ (3. 73)
⎝ d ⎠
by differentiation and the appropriate simplification gives:
tan (β )
dβ = dc 0 (3. 74)
c0
The error in beam steering propagates to an error in depth, given by:
z
dz β = − ⋅ tan 2 (β )dc 0 (3. 75)
c0
The depth variance due to beam steering is therefore:
2
⎛ z ⎞
σ
2
zβ = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ tan 4 (β)σ c0
2
(3. 76)
⎝ c0 ⎠
where σc0 corresponds to the variance of the sound velocity used for beam steering, usually
obtained by a sound velocity sensor.
M-13
179
Note that the estimated total depth variance due to sound velocity errors is written as:
2 2 2
σ z c = σ z c_profile + σ z β (3. 77)
The errors mentioned above may be detected by visual inspection of the data by trying to
detect abnormal curvature of the profiles (set of beams).
5.2.1.8.2 Due to motion sensing. The depth measurement is dependent on pitch error and roll error, the
contribution being given as follows:
dz θ R = R ⋅ cos(θ P ) ⋅ sin (β − θ R )dθ R (3. 78)
and:
dz θ P = R ⋅ sin(θ P ) ⋅ cos(β − θ R )dθ P (3. 79)
The depth variances are respectively:
σ z θR = (z ⋅ cos(θ P ) ⋅ tan (β − θ R )) σ θ R
2 2 2
(3. 80)
and:
σ z θP = (z ⋅ sin(θ P ) ) σ θ P
2 2 2
(3. 81)
The total depth variance due to vessel attitude and heave is:
2 2 2
σ z motion = σ z θ R + σ z θ P + σ 2h (3. 82)
where σ 2h is the heave variance.
5.2.1.8.3 Due to draught, settlement, squat and relative position of transducer. The accurate
measurement of transducer draught and knowledge of vessel behaviour in dynamic
conditions, settlement and squat, are fundamental to the accuracy of the measured depths.
These errors will contribute to the depth error independent of the beam angle.
The total depth variance due to transducer immersion, see 5.1.4.4, is written as:
σ i2 = σ draught
2
+ σ settlement
2
+ σ squat
2
(3. 83)
2
where σ draught 2
is the draught variance, σ settlement is the settlement variance, and σ squat
2
is the
squat variance.
M-13
180
5.2.1.8.4 Depth reduction. This issue was previously analysed in 5.1.4.8.
The QC may be performed by statistical calculations based on the comparison of soundings

from the check lines against the bathymetric surface generated from the main survey lines.
The statistics generated by the comparison should comply with the accuracy
recommendations in the S-44.
According to the errors presented above, the estimated reduced depth variance is written as
follows:
2
σ 2z = σ z c + σ 2h motion + σ i2 + σ 2tide + σ 2z det ection (3. 84)
where σ z det ection corresponds to the depth variance due to the seabed detection algorithm
implemented in the MBES system [Lurton, 2002].
The estimated error on the reduced depth, at the 68 percent (or 1σ) confidence level, is
obtained by the square-root of equation 3.84. Assuming that the component errors follow
approximately a normal distribution, the estimated error on the reduced depth, at the 95
percent (or 2σ) confidence level, is obtained by substituting each variance σ 2 by (2σ )2 .
5.2.2 Interferometric sonars
5.2.2.1 Interferometric sonar systems apply the phase content of the sonar signal to measure the angle of
a wave front returned from the seafloor or from a target. This principle differs from MBES which
forms a set of receive beams and performs seabed detection for each beam, either by amplitude or
phase, to detect the returning signal across the swath [Hughes Clarke, 2000].
These sonars have two or more horizontal arrays, each array produces a beam that is narrow
along track and wide across track. One of these arrays is used for transmission, ensonifying a
patch of the seafloor, scattering acoustic energy in all directions. Part of the scattered energy will
return back towards the transducers, which measure the angle made with the transducers. The
range is also calculated from the observed two-way travel time.
The method used for angle measurement can be diverse. The simplest method is to add the signal
copied from the two arrays together, being the resultant amplitude “fringes“, corresponding to
variations in signal strength. If the transducer arrays are separated by half a wave length, there
will only be one fringe, being the zero phase direction perpendicular to the transducer array axis
and the direction can be unambiguously determined. If the transducer arrays are separated by
several wave lengths, the angle of the detected wave front may be derived from directions where
maxima (or minima) of the received signal occur (Figure 3.42). However, this method, when
used alone, produces only a few measurements. Using the gradient of the fringes to produce
more measurements extends this method.
5.2.2.2 Forward looking sonars. Horizontal aperture sonars are used to detect obstructions ahead of the
vessel by mechanical or electronic scanning in the horizontal plane. These systems are
especially appropriate for the detection of obstructions in unsurveyed or poorly surveyed areas.
M-13
181
Fig. 3.42 "Pattern resulting from the interference, either constructive or destructive, from signals
received at two arrays, separated by a distance (d) 10 times the acoustic wave length (red) and half
wave length (blue)"
6. NON ACOUSTIC SYSTEMS
In addition to the acoustic systems, presented in previous sections, there are some electromagnetic
systems which may be used for depth determination, such as the airborne laser and electromagnetic
induction systems, as well as depth determination derived from satellite altimetry. These systems and the
traditional mechanical methods for depth measurement and sweeping are described below.
6.1 Airborne Laser Systems
Laser47 systems offer both an alternative and a complement to surveys with acoustic systems in shallow
waters [Guenther et al., 1996].
A laser system is composed of a laser scanning system, global positioning system (GPS) and an inertial
measurement unit (IMU).
Hydrographic airborne laser sounding, LIDAR (LIght Detection And Ranging), is a system for measuring
the water depth. This system emits laser pulses, at two frequencies (blue-green and infrared), in an arc
pattern across the flight path of the airborne platform; it records both signal arrivals from the light pulse
47
Laser is the acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. The laser basically consists of an
emitting diode that produces a light source at a specific frequency.
M-13
182
reflected by the sea surface and by the seafloor (Figure 3.43). The measured time difference, between the
two returns, is converted to distance.
Fig. 3.43 "Geometry of Lidar measurements"
Propagation of light through sea water, like the propagation of acoustic energy, depends on the
temperature, pressure and salinity. The sea water is, to some extent, transparent to light. In ideal
conditions, no material in suspension, the attenuation is a function of the absorption and scattering.
The transparency of sea water to the infrared and optical regions of the electromagnetic spectrum is a
function of the quantity of material suspended in the water. Therefore, water transparency48 is a
constraint to the use of laser sounding systems. Lidar maximum depth operation is about 2 to 3 times
observed Secchi disk49 depth.
A pulse of light of two different frequencies is transmitted in the direction of the sea; part of the energy
from the infrared beam is reflected by the sea surface back towards the aircraft, the blue-green laser beam
is transmitted to the water and partly reflected by the seafloor, also to be detected by the receiver. Using
accurate timing, the distance to the seafloor can be measured knowing the speed of light in the water. The
depth calculation requires, in addition, knowledge of the geometry of measurements according to Snell’s
law (Figure 3.44).
sen θ a sen θ w
= (3. 85)
ca cw
where θa and θw are the incidence angles in the air and into the water and ca and cw the respective speeds
of light in the air and the water.
48
The transparency of the sea water, i.e. the transmission of visible light through the water, can be measured quantitatively by
determining the Secchi disk depth.
49
The Secchi disk is a simple device to measure the water transparency. The disk is a white plate, approximately 30 cm in
diameter, fastened horizontally on the end of a rope marked in metres. The disk is lowered into the sea water and the depth
at which it is lost to sight is noted.
M-13
183
Fig. 3.44 "Lidar working principle"
6.1.2 Capabilities and limitations
Laser systems are efficient in shallow waters due to their outstanding productivity [Axelsson and
Alfredsson, 1999]. This productivity results from the high surveying speed and the swath width, which is
independent of water depth. In contrast, multibeam systems are operated at low surveying speed and the
swath width is proportional to the water depth (usually 3 times the water depth).
Laser systems give good coverage, close to full coverage, in extreme conditions of salinity and
temperature, where acoustic systems may produce poor quality data.
Undoubtedly, safety is a major advantage of laser system operation, particularly where under water
hazards may be risky for surface navigation.
Despite the capabilities mentioned above, laser systems are very sensitive to suspended material and
turbidity in the water column. The maximum operating depths, in optimal operation conditions, i.e. in
very clear waters, is about 50-70 metres.
6.2 Airborne Electromagnetic Systems
Airborne electromagnetic induction systems have been used for over 40 years to detect highly conductive
metallic mineral deposits. Advances in this technology have allowed the use of electromagnetic induction
principles for mapping seafloor formations in shallow water. Detailed information on airborne
electromagnetic induction systems is referred to Zollinger et al. [1987] and Smith and Keating [1996].
M-13
184
The operating principle of these systems is based on a geophysical survey technique for measuring the
electrical conductivity of bedrock or the thickness of a conductive layer.
A magnetic dipole transmitter, placed on a helicopter or a fixed wing aircraft, produces a magnetic field,
the primary field, and a towed receiver is used to detect the secondary magnetic field induced in the
ground.
Assuming horizontal layers, signal processing in time or frequency domain can be used to determine the
conductivity, σw, and thickness of the seawater column, i.e. the water depth, and conductivity, σs, of the
seafloor (Figure 3.45).
6.2.2 Capabilities and limitations
This no-acoustic system, due to the low frequencies involved, has the capability of operating over thick
ice. However, this system is limited to water depths of less than 100 metres and is, at present, for
reconnaissance purposes only.
Fig. 3.45 "Electromagnetic airborne working principle"
6.3 Remote Sensing
This section presents depth estimation derived from aerial photography and from satellite altimetry, as an
additional method for the coverage of extensive areas.
M-13
185
6.3.1 Photo-bathymetry
It is a common practise for aerial photography to be used to delineate the coast line and, sometimes, very
helpful in reconnaissance, planning of hydrographic surveys, location of shoals and the creation of a
qualitative description of the seafloor rather than a means by which to determine the water depth.
6.3.1.1 Principles of operation
Digital image processors have the ability to correlate light intensity with depth. However, variation in
light intensity is also dependent on material in suspension and on the reflective properties of the seafloor.
Thus a local calibration should be undertaken to account for these variations.
6.3.1.2 Capabilities and limitations
The application of photo-bathymetry, within the present limits of this technology, remains mainly a tool
for reconnaissance and planning in areas where there is insufficient or no depth information.
6.3.2 Others
Satellite images in the visible band may be used in a similar way to photo-bathymetry. However,
satellites may be equipped with high resolution altimeters for mapping the oceans’ surface and, with the
appropriate data processing, it is possible to estimate the depths all over the globe.
The ocean surface has an irregular shape which replicates, to some extent, the topography of the ocean
floor. Seafloor features, such as seamounts, contribute to a local modification of the earth’s gravity field,
inducing a deflection of the vertical, which causes a slope in the sea surface and consequently the
seawater is be pulled thus generating a bulge on the sea surface. The ocean surface can be mapped with
an accurate satellite altimeter and the anomaly, i.e. the difference between the observed ocean surface and
a theoretical surface, such as that created from WGS84 ellipsoid, can be determined and the water depth
estimated (Figure 3.46).
The integration of satellite altimetry with bathymetric measurements may produce a more reliable data set
which contributes to the knowledge of the seafloor topography in areas where hydrographic surveys are
sparse [Smith and Sandwell, 1997].
M-13
186
Fig. 3.46 "Satellite derived bathymetry"
6.4 Mechanic systems
Mechanic systems are the earliest tools used for depth measurement. Nonetheless, these systems still and
their place and remain in use to this day.
The systems studied up until now perform indirect measurements and are sensitive to seawater
characteristics. In typical conditions, gross errors in the depth measurements are likely to occur, these are
generated by echoes from within the water column and therefore they do not related to the seafloor, for
instance they can be caused by: kelp, schools of fish, deep scattering layer, thermal plumes and
sediments in suspension. Additionally errors may occur near piers, where echo detection occurs from the
returns of side lobes from the pier itself.
Mechanical methods (lead line or sounding pole) are not sensitive to these particular environmental
conditions and may provide an alternatively method.
Bar or wire sweep methods are an unambiguous way to detect minimum depths over wrecks or over
obstructions and to guarantee minimum depths throughout a navigation channel.
6.4.1 Lead line and sounding pole
The lead line aids the hydrographer in resolving echo sounder misinterpretation caused by spurious
returns.
When the bottom is visible, a lead line or sounding pole can consistently be placed on the high points and
the depth measured. In other areas, detection and measurement may be more difficult and sweeping
methods may be preferred.
M-13
187
6.4.1.1 Description
A lead line is a graduated line with attached marks and fastened to a sounding lead. The line is used for
determining the depth of water when sounding manually, generally, in depths of less than 50 metres.
A correction, to compensate for the shrinking and stretching of the line, may be applied to the depths
obtained; this error source has, however, been overcome by inserting a wire heart inside the rope.
A sounding pole is a pole graduated with marks which is also used for determining the depth of water
when manual sounding, generally it is used in depths of less than 4 metres.
As previously mentioned, at present, these tools are often used to check anomalous soundings gathered
with acoustical systems which occur in shallow waters.
6.4.1.2 Sources of error
The sources of depth measurement error with lead line are mainly due to:
a) Line curvature is induced by current and produces a depth error. The correction may be
problematical and, for this reason, it is recommended only undertaking the measurements
when the impact of the current will be negligible, the only remaining the affect being the
residual speed of the vessel.
b) Heave will contribute to the error in the depth measurement. Heave leads to difficulty in
reading the depth; this is overcome by taking an average of the reading between wave crests
and troughs.
6.4.1.3 Operation, data recording, and processing
The direct depth measurement should be performed with the vessel dead in the water and, if possible,
avoiding periods of strong currents and tidal flow. It is normal, between successive sounding positions, to
keep the lead line in the water to check for any prominent seafloor features.
6.4.2 Bar sweep
Bathymetric coverage with SBES only measures the depth along the survey lines, leaving the seafloor
between lines without coverage or detailed information, although side scan sonar is often used to search
and locate any prominent seafloor features between the SBES lines. For rock pinnacles or wrecks, SBES
may not detect the minimum depth when the echo is possibly too weak to be sensed by the receiver, this
is particularly the case for masts or sharp pieces of metal.
For navigation safety purposes, the use of an accurate mechanical sweep, either bar sweep or wire sweep,
is an adequate means to guarantee a minimum safe clearance depth throughout an area and, according to
S-44, it may be considered sufficient for Special Order and Order 1 surveys.
M-13
188
6.4.2.1 Description
The sweep is made of a bar about 5-6 metres in length. Each end of the bar may be packed with lead, or
other heavy material, to provide more weight and reduce lift when underway. The bar is suspended
below the vessel by graduated lines.
This instrument is very easy to manufacture. Trial and error tests may be used to obtain the best solution.
This is often more effective and easier to handle than a wire sweep.
6.4.2.2 Operation methodology
The bar or rod should be suspended horizontally under a vessel. The sweep may be equipped with
rockers or other sensors to record contact with the seabed.
The depth of the bar should be referred to the vertical datum, the tide height should be recorded during the
sweep operation and depths reduced as appropriate.
A complete coverage of the navigation area at a safe clearance depth should be performed; in the event of
an obstruction being detected, full coverage around the obstruction is recommended to confirm that the
minimum depth is detected.
6.4.3 Wire sweep
As an alternative to the bar sweep, a wire sweep may be used to determine the least depth over a
bathymetric feature when, from the general nature of the visible terrain, the existence of a rock pinnacle
or obstruction is suspected.
Detailed information on wire sweeping may be found in NOAA [1976].
6.4.3.1 Description
The sweep is constructed from two small trawl boards or doors (identical to those used by fish trawlers).
The trawl boards are connected by 40 to 60 metres of oval link chain. The sweep is bridled and towed so
that the connecting chain is dragged along the seabed approximately 60 metres astern of the towing vessel
NOAA [1976].
M-13
189
REFERENCES
Artilheiro, F. (1996) “Analysis and Procedures of Multibeam Master’s Report, Department of

Data Cleaning for Bathymetric Charting” Geodesy and Geomatics
Engineering, University of New
Brunswick, Fredericton New
Brunswick, Canada.
Axelsson, R. and M. “Capacity and Capability for US Hydrographic Conference 1999.
Alfredsson (1999) Hydrographic Missions”
Clay, C. e H. “Acoustical Oceanography” Wiley and Sons, Toronto.
Medwin (1977)
de Moustier, C. “State of the Art in Swath Bathymetry International Hydrographic Review,
(1988) Survey Systems” LXV(2), p. 25.
de Moustier, C. “Signal Processing for Swath Bathymetry Acoustic Signal Processing for
(1993). and Concurrent Seafloor Acoustic Ocean Exploration, J.M.F. Moura
Imaging” and I.M.G. Lourtie Eds., pp. 329-
354.
Godin, A. (1996). “The Calibration of Shallow Water Proceedings of the Canadian
Multibeam Echo-Sounding Systems” Hydrographic Conference ‘96,
Halifax, NS, Canada, pp. 25-31.
Guenther, G., R. “Design Considerations for Achieving SPIE: Laser Remote Sensing of
Thomas, and P. High Accuracy with the SHOALS Natural Waters: From Theory to
LaRocque (1996). Bathymetric Lidar System” Practice. 15, pp. 54-71.
Hare, R. (1995). “Depth and Position Error Budgets for International Hydrographic Review
Multibeam Echosounding” (LXXII), Monaco, pp 37-69.
Hughes Clarke, J. “Present-day Methods of Depth In: P. Cook and C. Carlton (eds)
(2000). Measurement” Continental Shelf Limits - The
Scientific and Legal Interface.
Oxford University Press, New
York.
IHO (1994). “Hydrographic Dictionary. Special International Hydrographic
publication No. 32, 5th edition” Organization, Monaco.
IHO (1998). “IHO Standards for Hydrographic International Hydrographic
Surveys. Special publication No. 44, 4th Organization, Monaco.
edition”
M-13
190
Kinsler, L., A. Frey, “Fundamentals of Acoustics”. Wiley and Sons, Toronto.

A. Coppens, and J.
Sanders (1982).
Lurton, X. (2002). “Acoustical Measurement Accuracy Canadian Hydrographic Conference
Modelling for Bathymetric Sonars” 2002.
NOAA (1976). “Hydrographic Manual. 4th edition” National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. US Department of
Commerce.
Pφhner, F. (1993). “Model for Calculation of Uncertainty in Report from Simrad Subsea AS,
Multibeam Depth Soundings” Horten, Norway, FEMME 93, 16 p.
Pickard, G. and W. “Descriptive Physical Oceanography – Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Emery (1990). An Introduction, 5th edition”
Seippel, R. (1983). “Transducers, Sensors and Detectors” Prentice-Hall.
Smith, R. and P. “The usefulness of multicomponent, time- Geophysics, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 74–
Keating (1996). domain airborne electromagnetic 81.
measurements”
Smith, W. and D. “Global Seafloor Topography from Science 277. pp. 1956-1962.
Sandwell (1997). Satellite Altimetry and Ship Depth
Sounding”
OMG (1996). “Multibeam Sonar Surveying Training University of New Brunswick.
Course. Ocean Mapping Group”
Urick, R. (1975). Principles of Underwater Acoustics. McGraw-Hill, Toronto.
Zollinger, R., H. “Airborne Electromagnetic Bathymetry” Geophysics, Vol. 52 no. 8, pp.
Morrinson, P. 1172-1137.
Lazenby, and A.
Becker (1987).
M-13
191
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Andersen, O. and P. “Global Gravity Field from ERS1 and Journal Geophysics Research
Knudsen (1998). GEOSAT Geodetic Mission Altimetry” 103(C4), pp. 8129-8137.
Arabelos, D. (1997). “On the Possibility to Estimate the In: R. Forsberg, M. Feissel, R.
Bottom Topography from Marine Gravity Dietrich (eds) Geodesy on the
and Satellite Altimetry Data Using Move Gravity, Geoid,
Collocation” Geodynamics, and Antarctica IAG
Symposia 119, Springer – Verlag
Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 105-112.
Burtch, R. (2002). “Lidar Principles and Applications” IMAGIN Conference 2002,
Traverse City.
Calmant, S. and N. “Modelling Bathymetry by Inverting Marine Geophysics Research 18,
Baudry (1996). Satellite Altimetry Data: A Review” pp. 23-134.
Collet, C., J. “SPOT Satellite Data Analysis for IEEE, pp. 964-967.
Provost, P. Rostaing, Bathymetric Mapping”
P. Pérez, and P.
Bouthemy (2000).
Denbigh, P. (1989). “Swath bathymetry: Principles of IEEE Journal of Oceanic
operation and an analysis of errors” Engineering 14, pp. 289–298.
Dixon, T., M. “Bathymetric Prediction from SEASAT Journal Geophysics Research 88,
Naraghi, M. McNutt, Altimeter Data” pp. 1563-1571.
and S. Smith (1983).
Durey, L., G. Terrie, “Bottom Reflectance Maps from In Proceedings, ERIM Fourth
R. Arnone, and A. Hyperspectral Sensors: An Application to International Conference on
Martinez (1997). AAHIS Data” Remote Sensing for Marine and
Coastal Environments, Orlando, pp.
17-19.
Geng, X. and A. “Precise Multibeam Acoustic Marine Geodesy, 22, pp. 157-167.
Zielinski (1999). Bathymetry”
Guenther, G. (1985). “Airborne Laser Hydrography: System NOAA Professional Paper Series,
Design and Performance Factors” National Ocean Service.
Guenther, G., A. “Meeting the Accuracy Challenge in Proceedings of EARSeL Symposium
Cunningham, P. Airborne Lidar Bathymetry” 2000. Dresden, Germany.
LaRocque, and D.
Reid (2000).
M-13
192
Guenther, G., M. “New Capabilities of the SHOALS Proceedings 5th International

Brooks, and P. Airborne Lidar Bathymeter” Conference on Remote Sensing for
LaRocque (1998). Marine and Coastal Environments,
ERIM International, October 5-7,
San Diego, CA, Vol. I, 47-55.
Guenther, G., P. "Multiple Surface Channels in SHOALS SPIE: Ocean Optics XII, Vol. 2258,
LaRocque, and W. Airborne Lidar" pp. 422-430.
Lillycrop (1994).
Guenther, G., R. "Design Considerations for Achieving SPIE: Laser Remote Sensing of
Thomas, and P. High Accuracy with the SHOALS Natural Waters from Theory to
LaRocque (1996). Bathymetric Lidar System" Practice, Vol. 2964, pp. 54-71.
Hammerstad E. “Simrad EM 950/1000 - Error Model for Extract of Report, Simrad Subsea
(1995). Australian Navy” AS, Horten, Norway, 4 p.
Hare, R. and A. “Estimating Depth and Positioning Proceedings of the Canadian
Godin (1996). Errors for the Creed/ EM 1000 Swath Hydrographic Conference ‘96.
Sounding System” Halifax, NS, Canada, pp. 9-15.
Herlihy, D., B. “National Oceanic and Atmospheric International Hydrographic Review,
Hillard, and T. Administration Sea Beam System - Patch Monaco, LXVI(2), pp. 119-139.
Rulon (1989). Test”
Hughes Clarke, J. “Reference Frame and Integration.” Lecture IV-1 in Coastal Multibeam
(1995). Hydrographic Surveys. United
States / Canada Hydrographic
Commission Multibeam Working
Group, St. Andrews, New
Brunswick, Canada.
Hughes Clarke, J. “Interactive Bathymetry Data Cleaning” Lecture X-4 from Coastal
(1995a). Multibeam Hydrographic Surveys.
United States / Canada
Hydrographic Commission
Multibeam Working Group, St.
Andrews, New Brunswick, Canada.
Ingham, A. (1992). “Hydrography for the Surveyor and 3rd edition, BSP, Oxford.
Engineer”
Irish, J. and W. “Scanning Laser Mapping of the Coastal ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry
Lillycrop (1999). Zone: The SHOALS System” and Remote Sensing, 54. pp. 123-
129.
Irish, J., J. McClung, “Airborne Lidar Bathymetry: the PIANC Bulletin. 2000 (103), pp.
and W. Lillycrop SHOALS System” 43-53.
(2000).
Jung, W. and P. “Predicting Bathymetry from Geosat Tectonophysics 210, pp. 235-253.
Vogt (1992). ERM and Ship Borne Profiles in the South
Atlantic Ocean”
M-13
193
Lillycrop W., L. "Development and Operation of the SPIE: Laser Remote Sensing of
Parson, and J. Irish SHOALS Airborne Lidar Hydrographic Natural Waters from Theory to
(1996). Survey System" Practice, Vol. 2964, pp. 26-37.
Lillycrop, W. and J. "Advancements in the US Army Corps of Marine Geodesy, Vol. 15, pp. 177-
Banic, (1993). Engineers Hydrographic Survey 185.
Capabilities: The SHOALS System"
Lillycrop, W., J. "SHOALS System: Three Years of Sea Technology, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp.
Irish, and L. Parson Operation with Airborne Lidar 17-25.
(1997). Bathymetry - Experiences, Capability and
Technology Advancements"
Lillycrop, W., L. "Field Test Results of the U.S. Army Proceedings of the 6th Biennial
Parson, L. Estep, P. Corps of Engineers Airborne Lidar National Ocean Service
LaRocque, G. Hydrographic Survey System" International Hydrographic
Guenther, M. Reed, Conference, Norfolk, VA, pp. 144-
and C. Truitt (1994). 151.
Parson, L., W. "Use of LIDAR Technology for Collecting Journal of Coastal Research, Vol.
Lillycrop, C. Klein, Shallow Bathymetry of Florida Bay" 13, No. 4.
R. Ives, and S.
Orlando (1996).
Pope, R., B. Reed, G “Use of an Airborne Laser Depth Proceedings of Hydrographic
West, and W. Sounding System in a Complex Shallow- Symposium XVth International
Lillycrop. (1997). water Environment” Hydro Conference. Monaco.
Quinn, R., (1992), "Coastal Base Mapping with the LARSEN Proceedings, 5th Biennial National
Scanning Lidar System and Other Ocean Service International
Sensors" Hydrographic Conference,
Baltimore.
Riley, J. (1995). "Evaluating SHOALS Bathymetry Using Proceedings 24th Joint Meeting of
NOAA Hydrographic Survey Data" UNIR Sea Bottom Surveys Panel,
Tokyo, Japan.
Sinclair, M. (1998). “Australians Get on Board with New Sea Technology, June 1998, pp. 19-
Laser Airborne Depth Sounder” 25.
Sinclair, M. (1999). “Laser Hydrography - Commercial Hydro 99.
Survey Operations”
Smith, R. and M. “Airborne Lidar and Airborne Proceedings Canadian
Smith (2000). Hyperspectral Imagery: A Fusion of Two Hydrographic Conference 2000.
Proven Sensors for Improved
Hydrographic Surveying”
Thomas, R. and G. "Water Surface Detection Strategy for an SPIE: Ocean Optics X, Vol. 1302,
Guenther (1990). Airborne Laser Bathymeter" pp. 597-611.
M-13
194
USACE (2002). “Hydrographic Surveying Manual” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,

Department of the Army,
Washington.
Vergos, G. and M. “On Improving the Determination of the Department of Geomatics
Sideris (1998). Gravity Field by Estimating the Bottom Engineering, University of Calgary.
Ocean Topography with Satellite
Altimetry and Shipborne Gravity Data”
Whitman, E. (1996). “Laser Airborne Bathymetry - Lifting the Sea Technology, August 1996, pp.
Littoral” 95-98.
Wozencraft, J. “The Coastal Zone Revealed Through Proceedings US Hydrographic
(2001). Shoals Lidar Data” Conference 2001.
Wright, C. and J. “EAARL: A LIDAR for Mapping Shallow Seventh International Conference
Brock (2002). Coral Reefs and Other Coastal on Remote Sensing for Marine and
Environments” Coastal Environments Proceedings
2002.
Yakima, W., Wilt “Electromagnetic Sounding in the Geophysics, Vol. 54, No. 8, pp.
M., H. Morrison, K. Columbia Basin” 952-961.
Lee, and N.
Goldstein (1989).
__________
M-13
195
CHAPTER 3 – ANNEX A
REFERENCE AND COORDINATE SYSTEMS
A. Reference and Coordinate Systems
Depth determination is performed in a vessel in dynamic conditions. Usually, a reference system (vessel
coordinate system), three orthogonal axes, is used on board to locate the hydrographic sensors and to
measure the vessel’s attitude and heave.
The vessel’s attitude consists of angular displacements about those axes, roll (transversally) about the x
axis, pitch (longitudinally) about the y axis, and yaw (horizontally) about the z axis. Considering an
orthogonal right-hand reference system with the z axis pointing downward; with the usual convention for
most attitude sensors roll is positive when starboard side is down, pitch is positive when bow is up, and
yaw is positive when rotating clockwise.
Considering Figure A.1, the rotation θ1 in the yz plane, i.e., rotation about the x axis, can be expressed by
the rotation matrix,
x
yL α xL
z ≡ zL
Fig. A.1. “Vessel reference system”
⎡1 0 0 ⎤
R 1 (θ) = ⎢0 cos(θ) sin(θ) ⎥⎥
⎢ (A. 1)
⎢⎣0 − sin(θ) cos(θ)⎥⎦
and the rotations about the y and z axes are respectively:
⎡cos(θ) 0 − sin(θ)⎤
R 2 (θ) = ⎢⎢ 0 1 0 ⎥⎥ , (A. 2)
⎢⎣ sin(θ) 0 cos(θ) ⎥⎦
M-13
196
⎡ cos(θ) sin (θ ) 0⎤
R 3 (θ) = ⎢⎢− sin (θ) cos(θ) 0⎥⎥ . (A. 3)
⎢⎣ 0 0 1⎥⎦
The transformation which results from three sequential rotations is represented by the product of the
rotation matrices. Successive rotations are applied to the left of this product.
Considering the successive rotations (θ1, θ2, θ3) about the x, y and z axes, the transformation matrix is
given by,
R 3 ( θ 3 ) ⋅ R 2 ( θ 2 ) ⋅ R 1 ( θ1 ) =
⎡ cos(θ3 ) cos(θ2 ) sin(θ3 ) cos(θ1) + cos(θ3 ) sin(θ2 ) sin(θ1) sin(θ3 ) sin(θ1) − cos(θ3 ) sin(θ2 ) cos(θ1)⎤
= ⎢⎢− sin(θ3 ) cos(θ2 ) cos(θ3 ) cos(θ1) − sin(θ3 ) sin(θ2 ) sin(θ1) cos(θ3 ) sin(θ1) + sin(θ3 ) sin(θ2 ) cos(θ1)⎥⎥ . (A. 4)
⎢⎣ sin(θ2 ) − cos(θ2 ) sin(θ1) cos(θ2 ) cos(θ1) ⎥⎦
The measured depths, initially referred to the vessel’s frame, need to be positioned in a local coordinate
system. Considering an orthogonal left-hand local coordinate system; with the x axis pointing to East, y
axis pointing to the geographic North, and the z axis pointing downward.
In a survey vessel with roll, pitch, and heading respectively: θR, θP, and α; a beam with slant range R and
angle β (Figure A.2), will be transferred from the tri-orthogonal, right-hand, vessel coordinate system (x,
y, z)V to the tri-orthogonal, left-hand, local coordinate system (x, y, z)L, with the rotation about the x axis
the reciprocal of the roll angle (-θR), the rotation about the y axis the reciprocal of the pitch angle (-θp),
and the rotation about the z axis the reciprocal of the heading angle (-α) and since the two z axes are both
positive downward, but the vessel coordinate system is a right-hand system and the local coordinate
system is a left-hand system, it is necessary to swap the x and y coordinates during the transformation
from vessel to local coordinate systems. This is performed by applying the matrix Rxy.
x ≡ x’
y’
β
R⋅ cos(β) R
z θR z’
R⋅ sin (β)
Fig. A.2 “Vessel and local level reference system”
M-13
197
⎡x ⎤ ⎡x ⎤ ⎡ 0 ⎤
⎢ y ⎥ = Rxy ⋅ R (− α ) ⋅ R (− θ ) ⋅ R (− θ )⎢ y ⎥ = T(α, θ , θ )⎢ R sin(θ) ⎥ (A. 5)
⎢ ⎥ 3 2 P 1 R ⎢ ⎥ P R ⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣ z ⎥⎦ L ⎢⎣ z ⎥⎦ V ⎢⎣R cos(θ) ⎥⎦ V
where Rxy is given by,

⎡0 1 0 ⎤
Rxy = ⎢⎢1 0 0⎥⎥
⎣⎢0 0 1⎥⎦
⎡sin(α)cos(θP ) cos(α)cos(θR ) + sin(α)sin(θP )sin(θR ) − cos(α)sin(θR ) + sin(α)sin(θP )cos(θR )⎤

T(α, θP , θR ) = ⎢⎢cos(α)cos(θP ) − sin(α)cos(θR ) + cos(α)sin(θP )sin(θR ) sin(α)sin(θR ) + cos(α)sin(θP )cos(θR ) ⎥⎥
⎢⎣ − sin(θP ) cos(θP )sin(θR ) cos(θP )cos(θR ) ⎥⎦
where T(α, θ P , θ R ) is the transformation matrix from reference frame measurements into the local
coordinate system.
⎡x ⎤ ⎡(cos(α) cos(θR ) + sin(α) sin(θP ) sin(θR )) ⋅ R sin(β) + (− cos(α) sin(θR ) + sin(α) sin(θP ) cos(θR )) ⋅ R cos(β)⎤
⎢ y⎥ = ⎢(− sin(α) cos(θ ) + cos(α) sin(θ ) sin(θ )) ⋅ R sin(β) + (sin(α) sin(θ ) + cos(α) sin(θ ) cos(θ )) ⋅ R cos(β)⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ R P R R P R ⎥
⎢⎣ z ⎥⎦ L ⎢⎣ cos(θP ) sin(θR ) ⋅ R sin(β) + cos(θP ) cos(θR ) ⋅ R cos(β) ⎥⎦
Note that the beam angle is positive to starboard side and negative to port.
__________
M-13
198
M-13
199
CHAPTER 4
SEAFLOOR CLASSIFICATION AND FEATURE DETECTION
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Hydrography includes the description of the features of the seas for a number of purposes not
restricted to navigation. The advent of sonar and swath echo sounders now enables a more
complete and detailed description to the benefit of safer navigation and other uses. Obviously,
it is impracticable to find every feature in every depth so the IHO have determined the
minimum size of feature which should be searched for and measured in any particular area.
Classification of the seafloor has been employed for minewarfare operations for many years but
the advent of automated classification software has enabled wider usage, particularly in fishery
and resource industries.
1.2 In this chapter, the phrases seafloor classification and seafloor characterisation, and feature
detection and object detection are synonymous
2. SEAFLOOR FEATURE DETECTION
2.1 Background
2.1.1 To ensure safe navigation it is necessary to detect features on the seafloor which may be a
hazard to navigation, whether natural or man made. A feature is defined as any item on the
seafloor which is distinctly different from the surrounding area; it can be anything from an
isolated rock on a flat sand seafloor to a wreck or obstruction. This activity is called seafloor
feature detection. Feature detection can also be used to detect and identify features which are
of interest to other seafarers, such as wellheads and mine-like features. The latter may not be of
navigational significance but are, nonetheless, of importance to those concerned.
2.1.2 A traditional survey will develop the bathymetry of an area by running a regular series of
sounding lines throughout the area. Multibeam echo sounder (MBES) or side scan sonar (SSS)
coverage is utilised for feature detection and to provide information regarding seafloor
classification. In some instances the detection of features is more important than the
acquisition of bathymetry. Specific features which have been identified on the MBES or SSS
image will usually require a more positive check of its position and the least depth.
2.2 Standards
2.2.1 There are a number of feature detection standards the most relevant being those contained in
IHO S-44 and IHO S-57.
2.2.2 IHO S-44 - Minimum Standards for Hydrographic Surveys
2.2.1.1 S-44 Table 1, summarised at Tables 4.1 and 4.2 below, specifies where a feature search is to be
undertaken and system detection capabilities for each Order of survey:
2.2.1.2 Once detected any features considered significant should have its position and the least depth
M-13
200
over it determined to the standards detailed in S-44 Table 1.
IHO S-44 Order and example areas Search Requirement

harbours, berthing areas and associated critical
Special Order 100% search compulsory.
channels with minimum under keel clearances.
harbours, harbour approach channels,
100% search required in
Order 1 recommended tracks and some coastal areas
selected areas.
with depths up to 100 m.
areas not described in Special Order and Order 1 100% search may be required
Order 2
or areas up to 200 m water depth. in selected areas.
offshore areas not described in Special Order
Order 3 no search required.
and Orders 1 & 2.
Table 4.1 “IHO S-44 Search Requirements”
IHO S-44 Order System Detection Capabilities

Special Order cubic features >1.0 m detectable.
Order 1 cubic features >2.0 m in depths down to 40 m detectable or 10% of depth
beyond 40 m (this depth chosen with regard to the maximum expected
Order 2 draught of vessels).
Order 3 not applicable.
Table 4.2 IHO S-44 System Detection Capabilities
2.2.3 IHO S-57 - Transfer Standards for Digital Hydrographic Data
2.2.3.1 S-57 specifies "Zones of Confidence" (ZOC) as the method of encoding data quality
information. ZOC were adopted to provide a simple and logical means of classifying all
bathymetric data and displaying to the mariner the confidence the national charting authority
places in it. Areas are classified by identifying various levels of confidence that can be placed
in underlying data using a combination of depth and position accuracy, thoroughness of
seafloor search and conformance to an approved quality plan.
2.2.3.2 ZOC A1, A2 and B are generated from modern and future surveys with, significantly, ZOC A1
and A2 requiring a full seafloor search, i.e. full feature detection. ZOC C and D reflect low
accuracy and poor quality data, whilst ZOC U represents data which is unassessed, but not
unsurveyed, at the time of publication. ZOC are designed to be depicted on paper charts, as an
insert diagram in place of the current reliability diagram, and on electronic displays.
2.2.3.3 It must be emphasised that ZOC are a charting standard and are not intended to be used for
specifying standards for hydrographic surveys or for management of data quality by individual
hydrographic authorities. Depth and position accuracy specified for each ZOC refer to errors
of final depicted soundings and include not only survey errors but other errors introduced in the
chart production process.
M-13
201
2.2.3.4 S-57 ZOC Feature Detection criteria are at Table 4.3:
S-57 ZOC Search Requirement

ZOC A1 full area search undertaken, all significant seafloor features
ZOC A2 detected and have had their depths measured. (see Note)
full area search not achieved, uncharted features hazardous to
ZOC B
navigation may exist.
ZOC C full area search not achieved, depth anomalies may be expected.
full area search not achieved, large depth anomalies may be
ZOC D
expected.
ZOC U quality of bathymetric data yet to be assessed.
Table 4.3 ZOC Feature Detection Criteria
Note: Significant seafloor features are defined in S-57 as those rising above depicted depths
by more than:
0.1 x depth, in depths <10 m,
1.0 m in depths of 10-30 m and
(0.1 x depth) minus 2.0 m in depths >30 m.
2.2.3.5 S-57 also details the relevant position and depth accuracy required of measured features.
2.2.4 Detection of Hazardous Features
2.2.4.1 The surveyor must remain cognisant of the fact that many features which are potentially
hazardous to navigation do not fit the S-44 “cubic feature” criteria; for example the masts of
wrecks and wellheads. However, ZOC criteria do take such features into account if they rise
above depicted depths by the prescribed amount. The ability to detect such features is a critical
issue when considering the type of system to be used to undertake feature detection. For
instance, these types of features will normally be detected by SSS but may not be detected by
MBES, lidar and other such systems due, for example, to the beam footprint or “filtering”
algorithms.
2.2.4.2 As far as the surveyor is concerned the purpose of a sonar sweep is to ensonify the area
between adjacent lines of soundings in order to detect any feature of significance to the
mariner. Although no hard and fast definition of the minimum length of a wreck can be given,
features less than three metres in length are unlikely to be sufficiently proud of the seafloor to
cause concern. There will of course be occasions when this is not so (e.g in coral areas or when
searching for masts) and the Surveyor must examine all sources of data available to him before
deciding on the minimum length feature he wishes to detect.
2.2.4.3 Note that in all calculations that follow, involving speeds over the ground that must not be
exceeded, the feature length is used and no account is taken of feature height. What is used for
calculations is the maximum length of feature that just fails to receive five ‘pings’, this being
M-13
202
considered the minimum to achieve feature detection. How much of the energy in the five
pings on the feature that returns to the transducer is dependent upon:
feature shape, extent, composition and aspect,
sonar conditions and
nature of the seafloor and other factors.
2.2.4.4 The amount of energy returned from the feature will control the intensity of the printed mark.
2.2.5 Military Requirements
2.2.5.1 Military forces often require detection of features smaller or deeper than those required for the
safety of navigation, for example some strive to detect features with a volumetric size of 0.5 m
on the continental shelf in depths to 200 m. Minewarfare forces, using specialised sensors, aim
to detect and classify even smaller features. Whilst these reflect particular capabilities not
normally required of the surveyor employed in nautical charting, there is a resultant effect on
the development of systems capable of achieving them becoming available on the commercial
market.
2.2.6 Reporting Features
2.2.6.1 Whilst it is desirable to investigate every feature which meets the above criteria in complex
areas this will not be possible. Surveyors may need to use their own judgement as to which
features warrant investigation after considering the available resources, the likely use of the
area (draught of vessels etc.) and the likely significance of the feature noting the general depths
in the area. For example, a shoal of 26 m in general depths of 28 m may not warrant further
investigation if the draught of vessels using the area is only 12 m. This will particularly be the
case if a ship transiting the area must at some point pass through general depths of, say, 20 m.
In such cases it may only be necessary to ensure that there is no indication of much shoaler
water (e.g. by interlining, sonar etc.).
2.2.6.2 The above criteria should also be used to ascertain whether or not a feature should be included
in any Report of Survey. In complex areas this list can become unwieldy; therefore the Report
need only include those features which are truly significant in terms of general depths and
likely usage.
2.2.6.3 At the end of each survey the surveyor, being the only person with all the facts at his disposal,
must give a firm opinion as to the status of each feature located, i.e. wreck, sea floor type,
unexamined etc., with findings included in their Report. Newly discovered features, which
may be dangerous to surface or submarine navigation, and charted features, which are found to
be significantly changed, are to be reported to the responsible National Hydrographic Office
(NHO) immediately. Uncharted features in depths less than 750 m would normally be
considered for Notice to Mariners action.
2.3 Methods of Feature Detection
2.3.1 Overview
2.3.1.1 There are a number of methods with which to achieve feature detection. SSS has a well proven
M-13
203
feature detection capability and can still be considered the most reliable means. However, SSS
is subject to operational limitations in that it is generally towed behind the survey vessel, which
introduces positional errors for features. These errors can be reduced by use of transponders in
the towfish and/or running past the feature in the opposite direction to obtain an average
position. SSS operations are also subject to the nadir gap which requires lines to be run with
sufficient overlap to detect features under adjacent tracks.
2.3.1.2 One of the main limitations of SSS is the speed of advance required to achieve sufficient pings
on a particular feature. With few exceptions this limits SSS operations to about six knots,
which impacts rate of effort. The advent of MBES offers the chance of meeting feature
detection requirements at higher speeds and therefore increased rate of effort. To date,
however, MBES detection of features of the size that meet IHO Special Order and ZOC A1/A2
requirements or other small and potentially hazardous features, cannot be guaranteed unless
certain precautions are taken, such as limiting the useable swath width and calculating an
appropriate speed of advance for ‘ping’ rate.
2.3.1.2.1 The geometry of a SSS transducer in relation to a feature is the key factor which makes it such
a successful tool for feature detection. The shadows cast behind a feature, proud of the
seafloor, are the telltale sign that a feature has been ensonified. The geometry of the MBES
transducer in relation to seafloor features results in the loss of almost all shadow-casting
capability. A surveyor wishing to use MBES for feature detection must then rely on the
MBES’s other characteristics in order to look for any features. These characteristics are high
resolution bathymetry and amplitude backscatter coupled with a positioning capability allowing
for very accurate repeatability. In addition, whilst features are normally capable of being
detected by an operator during SSS data acquisition, detection using MBES is far more
uncertain at this stage and post processing is usually required to allow results to be seen.
2.3.1.3 Other sensors which can be used for feature detection include singlebeam echosounder (SBES),
forward looking sonar, magnetometer and remote methods such as Airborne LiDAR
Bathymetry (ALB) and Airborne Electromagnetic Bathymetry (AEMB). Mechanical feature
detection methods, less used these days, include wire sweep, drag and diver.
2.3.2 Side Scan Sonar
2.3.2.1 Dual-channel SSS is now accepted as an essential aid to modern surveying and it remains the
case that no survey on the continental shelf can be considered complete unless a comprehensive
sonar sweep has been carried out and all contacts investigated.
2.3.2.2 In addition to locating wrecks and obstructions between survey lines, SSS also provides a
considerable amount of other seafloor information. These data, when combined with seafloor
samples and depth contours to produce seafloor classification, are of great value to those
involved with amphibious, minewarfare and submarine operations. The importance of this
information has grown over the years to such an extent that, in many surveys, sonar rather than
bathymetric considerations govern the selection of line direction and spacing. However, great
care is needed in the preparation and checking of these data if their full potential is to be
realised.
M-13
204
2.3.2.3 When used in hydrographic surveying, SSS has four main functions:
• The detection of wrecks and obstructions between sounding lines. Although precise position
and least depth cannot be determined by SSS, a properly tuned and operated sonar will detect
nearly all significant features between lines.
• The detection of other seafloor features. Correctly used, SSS can detect very small seafloor
features. Whilst not hazardous to navigation the positions of such features, or groups of
features, are of considerable importance in both submarine and minewarfare operations.
• The gathering of seafloor classification data. Knowledge of the texture of the seafloor,
combined with samples, is of great importance for submarine bottoming and minewarfare
operations, and for fisheries and resource development.
• The identification of mobile areas of seafloor. The presence of sand-waves and ripples are
indications that the seafloor in a particular area is mobile. On major shipping routes such
areas may require periodic re-survey to ensure safety of navigation.
2.3.3 Theoretical Considerations
2.3.3.1 The strength of the signal returned by a given feature is governed by several factors linked by
an expression known as the “sonar equation” which may be used to determine whether a
particular type of feature will or will not be detected. A good explanation of the terms involved
in this equation is given in the 1981 FIG/IHO “Report on the Detection of Depth Anomalies”.
The standard textbook that should be consulted if a further study of this subject is required is
“Principles of Underwater Sound” by R.J. Urick. It must be stressed that this equation can
form only the starting point for a consideration of SSS performance. It ignores signal losses
and other acoustic parameters, as well as the limitations of the towfish and the recorder.
2.3.3.2 Short range coverage. There is a region close to the towfish where gaps in the sonar cover may
occur. These gaps need to be considered in two planes (see Figure 4.1):
Direction of Tow
Fig. 4.1 SSS Horizontal and Vertical Beam Coverage
M-13
205
• The vertical plane. The main beam of the sonar has a width in the vertical plane of about
50°, with the beam axis tilted 10° downwards. There is, therefore, a region under the towfish
which lies outside the main beam; the size of this region is governed by the height of the
transducers off the seafloor. The original concept of this area not being ensonified at all is
incorrect. Unless the towfish is a long way off the seafloor this zone is covered by side lobes
from the transducers, and parts will receive some sound energy from the fringes of the main
beam. (The “edge” of a beam is usually taken as the half-power line, but this is not an
absolute cut-off point and some energy exists outside it). Whilst a gap in the record under
the towfish does occur, it is considerably smaller than originally thought and may only be a
few metres in extent. Nevertheless, this gap must be covered by sonar from the adjacent
lines.
• The horizontal plane. There is an area close to the towfish (the “near field”) where the sound
pulses have parallel edges. As a result, gaps may occur between individual pulses of sound.
The gap between pulses in the near field is a function of ship speed and pulse repetition rate.
Beyond this area, the spreading of the beams closes the gaps to give total coverage. Small
contacts are therefore likely to be missed close to the towfish rather than further away from
it.
2.3.3.3 Planning Area Searches. Two different methods of planning area searches can be used:
• Detecting contacts close to the towfish. The search is planned so that the smallest required
contact can be detected close to the towfish. The limiting case requires such contacts in the
near-field of the sonar beam to receive five pulses; outside this area, beam expansion ensures
they will receive at least five pulses.
• Detecting contacts further away from towfish. The zone where small contacts may not be
detected can be calculated for a given range scale in use and speed over the ground. Line
spacing can then be adjusted so that sweeps from adjacent lines at least cover the gap.
Alternatively, line spacing can be fixed and speed adjusted to ensure that full coverage is
achieved. Thus with a range scale of 150 m in use and at a speed at which small contacts
may not be detected within the first 25 m, line spacing must not be more than 125 m.
2.3.3.4 The second of the above methods is usually employed on area searches as it allows a faster
speed of advance. For a line-spacing of 125 m using the 150 m range-scale, one metre contacts
will be detected in the near field at a speed of 3.6 knots. Relying on detecting them from
adjacent lines allows a speed increase to 7.0 kt. Details of the calculation follow (see ‘Feature
Detection’ and ‘Calculation of Speed of Advance’).
2.3.3.5 Confirming SSS Performance. Whilst these calculations will provide theoretical capabilities it
is essential that a SSS’s performance is confirmed in the field prior to use. This is achieved by
selecting a suitable feature, reflecting the type and size of feature required to be detected during
the survey, and towing the SSS past it. Both sonar channels, i.e. both sides, and each range
scale should be tested to determine the maximum detection range.
2.3.3.6 Position of the Sidescan Towfish. Towing the sonar transducers astern of the vessel has several
advantages including removing the sensor from the effects of vessel motion and operating it at
a height above the seafloor which will enable the optimum shadow. However, there is a
disadvantage in that it also introduces uncertainty as to the position of the towfish. This error
has three components:
M-13
206
• an along-track component, caused by uncertainty in how far the towfish is astern of the
vessel; this depends on the length of cable out, depth of towfish and vertical catenary of the
cable (the last two also vary with the ship’s speed);
• an across-track component, caused by deflection of the towfish by tidal stream or current,

and by ship manoeuvres;
• errors in the position of the ship or boat, which will be transferred to the towfish.
2.3.3.7 Towfish position can be determined using an Ultra Short Baseline (USBL) positioning system
which requires transducers/receivers to be fitted in the vessel and towfish; however the
accuracy of this system deteriorates rapidly depending on the length of tow. An alternative
method, under development in Australia, utilises the direction and angle of depression of the
tow cable over the stern of the vessel, together with a model of the catenary of the tow cable to
predict, reasonably accurately, the towfish position.
2.3.3.8 In addition, the attitude of the towfish may vary both longitudinally and about its axis and thus
the direction of the transducer beams may fluctuate. This is especially true if the ship's course
or speed are frequently changing and emphasises the need for generous overlaps during sonar
sweeping. Planning to theoretical limits of performance is almost certain to lead to gaps in the
sweep in reality.
2.3.3.9 Hull Mounting. SSS can be mounted in the hull of a surface vessel. The advantages of this are
that its position, and hence orientation, are accurately known and therefore the positioning of
detected features is relatively easy. Hull mounting also enables freedom of manoeuvre for the
vessel which is no longer required to tow the sensor. However there are a number of
disadvantages to hull mounting including the effect of vessel motion on SSS ensonification and
performance, possible mutual interference with other hull mounted sensors, e.g. MBES, and the
fact that it is unlikely that the SSS will be operated at the optimum height above the sea floor.
Hull mounting is often the best method when operating in shallow water or in areas where the
seafloor topography is potential hazardous, e.g. reef strewn. Otherwise, the disadvantages of
hull mounting would normally outweigh the advantages.
2.3.4 Operational Constraints
2.3.4.1 Hydrodynamic Stability of the Towfish. Under most conditions the towfish is largely
decoupled from the effects of ship's motion by the flexibility of the tow-cable. The assumption
is usually made that the towfish is completely stable in roll, pitch and yaw, although some
motion in all these planes undoubtedly occurs. Roll probably has relatively little effect on the
sonar picture, being compensated for by the wide beam angle in the vertical plane. A
permanent list in one direction, which may be caused by a distorted fin or a twist in the cable
can, however, markedly decrease performance. This should be suspected if one channel gives
a different quality of picture to the other.
2.3.4.2 In extreme cases it may be necessary to rely only on the “good” channel and allow for this in
planning survey lines. Pitch and yaw are more significant; with such a narrow beam-width in
the horizontal plane, these motions could decrease detection probabilities of small features. A
feature that would receive at least five pulses with a stable towfish may only receive three or
four if the towfish is oscillating in either of these directions.
M-13
207
2.3.4.3 The problem of towfish stability is believed to be less important than that of towfish position.
In rough weather the effects of towfish oscillation can usually be clearly seen on the trace.
Under these conditions the reduction in the probability of detecting small features must be
considered. With the increasing use of heave compensators and motion sensors for echo
sounders and the greater importance attached to detecting small contacts, sonar conditions
rather than echo sounder performance may be the limiting factor for effective surveying.
2.3.4.4 Height of Towfish. For most work the optimum height of the towfish above the seafloor is
10% of the range-scale in use, i.e. on the 150 m scale the towfish should be 15 m above the
seafloor. SSS transducers are directed slightly downwards so flying the towfish too close to the
seafloor may reduce the range from which returns can be received. If the towfish is too high
acoustic shadows may not be formed behind obstructions making them more difficult to detect.
This is especially true in deep water when a compromise has to be made between the need for
getting the towfish down to a useful depth and maintaining a reasonable speed of advance.
2.3.4.5 In areas of very high seafloor relief it may be prudent to tow the sonar higher than normal; in
this event the reduction in acoustic shadow on features standing proud of the seafloor must be
borne in mind. This effect is worst close in to the towfish where detection of small contacts is
already at its most difficult.
2.3.4.6 In shallow water it may not be possible to get the towfish as high off the seafloor as desirable.
Although the recorder will be giving a background trace across the entire width of the paper,
the sonar beam may not be ensonifying the entire range. Under these conditions the only
solution is to reduce both the range scale and the line spacing.
2.3.4.7 As a further limitation in shallow water the transducers may be very close to the surface with
little tow-cable streamed. This will introduce the problem of surface noise (such as waves and
ships wake) degrading performance and may also lead to the towfish being adversely affected
by the motion of the ship. The effects of water layers and thermoclines on SSS can usually be
ignored, they have very little effect on the range at the frequencies used.
2.3.4.8 When investigating contacts with sonar the towfish should always be sufficiently high above
the seafloor to allow it to pass over the obstruction in the event of an accidental “on top”. The
least depth over a feature can usually be estimated initially from the shadow length obtained
during the area search.
2.3.4.9 If it becomes necessary to tow the towfish at a height other than the optimum, a confidence
check should always be carried out to confirm the system continues to meet detection and other
requirements. Towfish height can easily be controlled by a combination of wire out and ship’s
speed. Quickly heaving in a length of cable will “snatch” the towfish upwards rapidly, after
which it will settle back down more slowly. This technique can be very useful in lifting the
towfish over unexpected dangers. As the length of wire streamed increases this method
becomes less effective.
2.3.4.10 Depressors. Some SSS towfish can be equipped with depressors which will drive the fish
deeper for any given length of tow cable or speed of advance. Whilst this can reduce the length
of tow required there are a number of disadvantages to using depressors:
• they increase strain on the cable resulting in the requirement for a more powerful winch if
scope is to be adjusted underway; and manual operations can become impracticable;
M-13
208
• the shorter scope of cable results in the transmission of ship movement down to the towfish;
• they can reduce the effect of an increase in speed and/or reduction in scope of tow cable on
the towfish height, thus negating the use of this technique to overcome unexpected dangers.
2.3.4.11 When operating in close proximity to the sea floor it is prudent to ensure the towfish is fitted
with a trip mechanism that enables it to flip over and still be retrieved after a strike. In this case
it is possible the fins will be lost, but at least the towfish itself is recovered. Some modern SSS
avoid the problem of fin loss by only having upward facing fins.
2.3.4.12 Direction of tow. In normal circumstances SSS should be towed into and out-of the
predominant tidal stream/current in order to minimise their effect on the towfish in the form of
across track positional errors. Where tidal stream/current effects are not an issue the SSS
should be towed parallel to the bathymetric contours. This minimises the requirement to have
to continually adjust the scope of tow when steaming into and out-of shallow water.
2.3.4.13 However, there are exceptions to these rules. In sandwave areas, in particular, it may be
necessary to tow the SSS at right angles to the axis of the sandwaves. This ensures that the SSS
looks along the sandwave crests/troughs to avoid the possibility of shadow areas where features
will not be detected, see Figure 4.2.
towfish shadow area
axis of sandwaves
sandwave – crest / trough correct direction of tow
Fig. 4.2 Sidescan Sonar – Potential Shadow Areas in Sandwaves

and Correct Direction of Tow”
2.3.4.14 Effective Sonar Range. The presence of marks on the sonar trace does not necessarily indicate
that returning echoes are being received. Transmission losses, interference from other sources
of noise, water conditions and recorder limitations all restrict the useful range of SSS. A
maximum range of 270 m is about all that can be expected for even large wrecks, with small
contacts (1-2 m) unlikely to be detected beyond about 120-150 m. Detection range varies
between different SSS models and frequencies - the higher the frequency the less the detection
range, although the resulting picture may be better. The best results will usually be achieved by
restricting the range scale to 150 m to take advantage of the higher pulse rates and greater
definition. A short test using a suitable seafloor contact at varying ranges will usually provide
information on sonar conditions in the survey area.
2.3.5 Distortions of Sonar Records
2.3.5.1 Sonographs never represent isometric maps of the seafloor. Various distorting factors have to
M-13
209
be recognised when interpreting sonograph mosaics in map form, unless the distortions have
been eliminated digitally before the mosaic has been compiled. The main causes of distortion
are:
• compression of sonograph picture with speed increase - a distortion will occur parallel to the
course made good due to variable ship speeds and constant paper feed speed, resulting
usually in a compression of the record in this direction;
• the height of the towfish above the seafloor will introduce a lateral distortion perpendicular
to the direction of travel;
• a sloping seafloor will introduce distortions perpendicular to the direction of travel which are
different on the up-slope and down-slope sides.
2.3.5.2 For a given ship’s speed, range scale, paper speed and towfish height, the distortions can be
calculated. During area sweeps these effects generally only need to be considered when
plotting contacts; during investigations they need to be considered in detail. Speed during
investigations should be adjusted to give as little distortion as possible, about 3.0 kt is usually
ideal.
2.3.5.3 Lloyd Mirror Effect. During sonar operations in very calm conditions reflection of some of the
sonar energy can occur from the sea-surface, as shown in Figure 4.3. This is known as the
Lloyd Mirror Effect and results in a series of maxima and minima in the sonar image. This
effect normally occurs only when the towfish is close to the surface and can be minimised by
towing the towfish deeper.
Fig. 4.3 Lloyd Mirror Effect
2.3.5.4 Cross Talk. Cross talk between two SSS channels can result in a mirror image of sea floor
features from one channel being displayed on the opposite channel, albeit usually fainter. Cross
talk can result in the true image on the effected side being obscured. This may prevent
detection of features or to the erroneous ‘detection’ of what are, in effect, copies of real features
from the opposite side. This can be a particular problem in areas where there are numerous
features in which case it can be difficult to verify what is real and what is not.
M-13
210
2.3.5.5 Tilt Effect. If the side scan towfish is not being towed level, in other words it is tilted to one
side, the channel that is facing downwards towards the sea floor will result in a stronger return
signal and therefore a darker image; on the other hand the channel that is facing upwards will
result in a lighter image. Seafloor classification is based on interpreting the image shading, a
result of the relative strength of the return signal from different seafloor types. The tilt effect
can therefore result in difficult or even erroneous interpretation.
2.3.5.6 Automatic Gain Control (AGC). AGC was introduced as a means of ensuring the SSS image
was optimised for feature detection. In other words in areas of strong return, such as rock, the
gain was automatically decreased to enable features to be detected against a ‘light’ background.
However, as with the tilt effect, altering the gain and hence the resulting image shading, also
renders seafloor classification difficult, if not impossible. For this reason AGC should be
turned off if the sonar image is to be used for seafloor classification.
2.3.5.7 Wash and Wake. If the SSS is towed too close to the surface the image can be affected by
returns from the wash or wake of other vessels or even the towing vessel itself if it has recently
made a turn. Again, such interference can seriously impact seafloor classification and it is
important that a sonar log is maintained so that such incidents can be recorded to assist
subsequent image interpretation.
2.3.5.8 Thermocline. As with any sonar, SSS transmissions are subject to the effects of their passing
through water with changing properties and which may result in distortion of the image. Whilst
software can be used to ‘mould’ the image back into shape, it is the important for the surveyor
to know, and hence the degree of sonar ensonification which is used to overcome this problem.
For instance, in areas significant to navigation, a higher level of ensonification redundancy may
be required with adjacent lines run in opposite direction and possibly additional lines at right
angles, with a short range scale selected. In less important areas the range scale employed may
be greater and the degree of overlap and redundancy less and therefore distortion can become
more of a problem.
2.3.5.9 “Sound Underwater Images - A Guide to the Generation and Interpretation of Side Scan Sonar
Data” (Fish JP & Carr HA, 1990) is an example of a reference text that may be used to assist
sonar interpretation.
2.3.6 Feature Detection
2.3.6.1 The following assumptions are made:
• feature size is defined as the length presented normal to the sonar beam;
• the minimum number of returns to make a discernible mark on the trace is taken as five;
• sound velocity is assumed to be 1500 m/sec;
• beam angle of the sonar is 1.5°.
M-13
211
2.3.6.2 Terms and Units:
pulse interval - t seconds

pulse repetition interval - F pulses per second
ship's speed (over ground) - V metres per second
feature length - L metres
velocity of sound in seawater - C metres per second
recorder range scale - Rm metres
beam width - Bw metres
slant range to contact - Rs metres
length of array - l metres
distance travelled between pulses - d metres
2.3.6.3 Basic Equations:
F = C pulses per second; or, t = 1 seconds

2Rm F
Because φ is a very small angle, beam width at a given range (Bw) = Rs x φ
2.3.6.4 It can be seen from Figure 4.4 that Feature A is the largest feature that CANNOT receive five
pings; it can receive a maximum of four (i.e. pings 2, 3 and 4 and either ping 1 or 5). However,
theoretically, a small increase in Feature A's length would mean that it received five pings; in
general, for N pulses its length is given by:
L = V x t x (N - 1) – Bw (4.1)
2.3.6.5 Feature B is the smallest feature that MUST (theoretically) receive five pings; it is caught by
the first and just missed by the sixth. Its length is given by:
L =V x t x N - Bw (4.2)
Essentially this is the same equation as used to determine speed whilst echo sounding. Both
formulae assume that the sonar beam is divergent.
2.3.6.6 In general, equation (4.1) is used when determining either:
• the length of feature that will receive five pings at a given speed over the ground;
• the speed over the ground that cannot be exceeded if a feature of a given length is to receive
five pings.
2.3.6.7 There may be occasions when the surveyor feels it more prudent to use equation (4.2) giving a
greater probability of detection.
M-13
212
Fig. 4.4 Diagram showing Feature Detection
2.3.7 Calculation of Speed of Advance (SoA)
2.3.7.1 A typical survey scale is 1:25,000 in which case the usual spacing of lines is 125 m with the
SSS on the 150 m range scale. In general, it is advantageous if bathymetry and sonar sweeping
can be carried out at the same time. With lines 125 m apart a swathe 25 m either side of
adjacent lines is ensonified, although this may be reduced with wayward line-keeping.
2.3.7.2 To recognise a feature on the SSS trace it is necessary to ensure it receives five pings. To
identify it as a significant feature requires a confirmatory detection from another line. This
does not mean that contacts not detected on adjacent lines may be discarded as spurious but that
a small wreck at the outer edge of the SSS trace may easily be overlooked.
2.3.7.3 In an area sweep it is then necessary to determine the speed over the ground which must not be
exceeded in order that a feature of one metre in length should receive five pings from two
adjacent lines. This gives the Speed over the Ground (SoG) which should not be exceeded.
Fig. 4.5 Calculating Speed of Advance
M-13
213
2.3.7.4 In Figure 4.5 A, B and C are three lines spaced 125 m apart. A survey vessel is operating its
SSS on the 150 m range scale. What criteria must be satisfied?
2.3.7.5 Near Field. The near field limit is usually within 20 m. Therefore with a 25 m overlap from
adjacent lines a feature which would not have received five pings at a given range in the near
field on line B will get five pings from both lines A and C. In this case the near field detection
speed of 3.6 knots is not a limiting factor.
2.3.7.6 Far Field. Contact 1 should be detected from lines A and B, Contact 2 will get five pings from
lines A and C, Contact 3 from lines B and C. It is necessary to calculate the speed over the
ground that must not be exceeded if a contact of length L m is to get five pings at 25 m.
If L = 3.0 m then:
From equation (4.1) the maximum length of feature that will not get five pings is:
L = V x t x (N - 1) – Bw
where Bw = 25.0 ·x φ
N=5
t = 0.2 sec
L = 2.999 m (see Note)
Note: because theoretically a slightly longer feature, i.e. 3.0 m, should get five pings.
rearranging: V = L + Bw
(N - 1) x t
= 2.999 + 0.6545
4 x (0.2)
= 4.57 m/sec or 8.9 kt
2.3.7.7 In fact for practical reasons the towfish should not be towed at speeds over the ground in excess
of 8.0 kt, or small features will be missed, or 10 knots through the water since above this speed
the towfish is liable to yaw. Note also that if five pings to a feature are to be “guaranteed” then
equation (4.2) should be used giving a V of 3.65 m/sec or 7.1 kt.
2.3.7.8 If the requirement is to detect features 1.0 m in length from two lines then:
V = 0.999 + 0.6545
4 x (0.2)
= 2.067 m/sec or 4.0 kt
M-13
214
2.3.7.9 However if five pings into a one metre feature from one line only are to be required then:
V = 0.999 + (72.5 x Bw)

4 x (0.2)
= 3.623 m/sec or 7.0 kt
2.3.7.10 The danger with using the last of the above equations is that the probability of detection of a
small feature in a “one chance only” situation is low.
2.3.7.11 “Fast” SSS. As technology evolves some SSS are able to be operated at faster speeds over the
ground than was previously possible. An example is the Klein 5000 series, which employs
beam steering and focussing techniques simultaneously generating several adjacent, parallel
beams per side. This “multibeam” design permits higher towing speeds whilst providing high
resolution imagery. Other SSS developments include the use of interferometric, multi-pulse
and synthetic aperture techniques. However, as with all such sensors, it is essential that its
performance is validated against known targets, which represent features required to be
detected. Validation should be followed up by initial and regular repeat confidence checks in
the survey area.
2.3.8 Track-Keeping Errors
2.3.8.1 A question that needs to be addressed is how far off track can the survey vessel go before a gap
in coverage is created? Assuming only one detection (five pings) is required to a 1.0 m feature,
a standard 1:25,000 survey is being undertaken with lines 125 m apart and range scale 0-150 m
selected, then overlap is 25 m. The sum of any errors must be contained within this figure.
For example:
towfish position e1 10 m
vessel navigation e2 5m
slope effect e3 1m
sound velocity variations e4 1.5 m
therefore ∑e2 = 128.25 m
total error RMS E= 11.3 m
2.3.8.2 Overlap is 25 m, however only 24 m is useable (the contact has to paint) therefore total
allowable track error = √ [242 - Σe2] = 21 m
2.3.8.3 This assumes that a feature is detectable at 149 m where it will paint as a black dot 0.8 mm by
0.8 mm with a 1 mm shadow (that is if the shadow is not obliterated by the 150 m range line).
A more prudent off track allowance would be 15 m; this plots as 0.6 mm at a scale of 1:25,000.
2.3.9 Practical use of Side Scan Sonar
2.3.9.1 Area Sweep is the name given to the standard hydrographic sonar search method. The
categories of sonar sweep required for any given survey will be specified in the survey
instructions. An example of categories of SSS search is as follows:
M-13
215
Category A and B. Search in one direction and/or its reciprocal using SSS. Where practicable,
adjacent lines are to be run in opposite directions. Searches for all listed wrecks are to be
conducted. Examples of sonar line spacing, range scale, overlap to be achieved and maximum
speed over the ground to be used are given at Table 4.4.
Category A sweeps are intended to be the standard sweeps for coastal and inshore areas not
subject to routine re-survey. These sweeps are designed to achieve a theoretical seafloor
ensonification of 240%, i.e. [2 x effective sonar range/line spacing] x 100 = % ensonification.
Category B sweeps achieve a theoretical seafloor ensonification of 133% and may be used for
routine re-surveys and in depths greater than 100 m where detection of all features is less
critical.
Category B sweeps achieve a theoretical seafloor ensonification of 133% and may be used for
routine re-surveys and in depths greater than 100 m where detection of all features is less
critical.
Category C. Only searches for listed wrecks are to be conducted.
Category D. Special searches as ordered. This includes special instructions for use of
particular SSS and hull mounted sonars etc.
Max
Sonar Line Sonar Range Speed Adjacent Line
Category Type of Survey over
Spacing Scale Overlap1
the
Ground
A1 Special 125 m 150 m 6 kt 25 m
inshore & coastal surveys
at >1:25,000 in depths <15 62.5 m 75 m 12.5 m
m
inshore & coastal surveys
A2 at >1:25,000 in depths <50 125 m 150 m 8 kt 25 m
m
(See Note 2)
shelf surveys in depths
>50 m and/or scale 250 m 300 m 50 m
<1:25,000
B1 routine re-surveys 250 m 150 m 50 m
shelf survey scale <
B2 500 m 300 m 100 m
1:25,000 in depths >100 m
Table 4.4 – Sidescan Sonar Search - Categories A and B - Example Criteria
Notes:
1. The overlap under adjacent lines is to allow for limited wayward line-keeping and positional
inaccuracies. If the surveyor considers positional inaccuracies and/or wayward line-keeping
M-13
216
exceed this figure then he should adjust the line spacing or range scale, with subsequent
speed adjustments, as necessary.
2. See previous comments with regard to use of “fast” SSS which may enable these speeds to
be increased.
2.3.9.2 It is emphasised that these reflect minimum standards; if in doubt over sonar performance, line
spacing should be tightened or speed reduced. In all cases it is necessary to refer to the relevant
IHO S-44 or S-57 ZOC standards to ensure search requirements are met.
2.3.9.3 The use of a regular series of parallel straight lines remains the most efficient way of covering a
survey area. The line direction will be close to the direction of the tidal stream to minimise
towfish offset. The line spacing for the sonar lines is determined by the range scale in use and
the overlap required. It is recommended that the overlap between adjacent swaths is 125%.
2.3.9.4 For military surveys on the continental shelf in water depths less than 200 m, the requirement is
often to detect all contacts larger than one metre in extent. With existing equipment this cannot
easily be achieved and a compromise between the requirements of sonar and bathymetry must
be reached. A sonar sweep which will detect one metre contacts in depths less than 140 m
provides this compromise. For the normal scale of l:25,000, this means a line spacing of 125
m, sonar range scale of 150 m and a speed over the ground no faster than 7 knots. Existing
equipment cannot effectively be deployed deeper than 150 m and, in water between 150 and
200 m depth, the search will be restricted to locating large wrecks and obstructions.
2.3.9.5 Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUV). The employment of UUV equipped with SSS and
MBES is becoming increasingly common. These platforms enable sensors to be operated at
great depth and at the appropriate altitude above the seafloor. Thus it is likely that small
features will be capable of detection at greater depths than is currently possible when
employing surface vessel mounted or towed sensors.
2.3.9.6 Sonar sweeps should always be undertaken with lines orientated as closely as possible parallel
to the main tidal flow in the survey area. The cross-track errors in the position of the towfish
are invariably greater than those along the track and every effort should be made to minimise
them. At a speed of 6 kt with 400 m of wire out and a tidal stream of 2 kt, a difference of 10°
between tidal flow and line direction can offset the towfish 17 m from the line.
2.3.9.7 The running of an extra sonar line immediately outside each edge of the survey area is
necessary to ensure that the ordered category of sweep continues to the limit of the area.
Similarly, care must be taken to ensure that the SSS towfish has cleared the edge of the survey
area before a survey line is ended.
2.3.9.8 It must be remembered that speed and feature detection probabilities calculated here are
theoretical and take no account of adverse sonar conditions and equipment failings.
2.3.9.9 Plotting of Contacts. The detection of seafloor contacts between survey lines is one of the main
reasons for using SSS. The ultimate use of the information must always be considered when
deciding which contacts to plot; for example, submarines will not take the ground in areas of
rough seafloor and minewarfare operations will usually be selected to avoid them. In areas of
smooth seafloor the aim must always be to detect and plot every contact; in more rugged areas
this standard will have to be relaxed. All such contacts must be plotted and allocated a contact
number which will ultimately be included in the seafloor classification model.
M-13
217
2.3.9.10 Various techniques have been developed to plot contacts from manuscript SSS records; all
attempt to reduce the errors in the contact position caused by errors in towfish position and
orientation. Different techniques are to be used for contacts plotted from area searches,
investigations and examinations:
• Contacts from area searches are usually plotted from two directions 180° apart. The standard
“layback and offset” method should be used, with the mean of the two positions adopted as
the most likely position.
• Investigations should produce a minimum of two pairs of passes for each contact at right-
angles to each other, orientated in such a way as to fix the extremities.
• When a contact is examined by echosounder, the best “on top” position is to be used in
preference to any SSS derived one, where possible an echo sounder line should pass the
length of the long axis of the contact.
2.3.9.11 Measurements by Sonar. A good “beam-on” SSS picture of a wreck or obstruction can usually
be used to estimate its height above the seafloor using the sonar “shadow”. Although not
accurate enough for charting purposes, this height is very useful for the safety of both ship and
towfish when planning investigations. Estimates of the beam and length of a wreck can also be
obtained from the sonar trace. The following points should always be considered:
• when estimating heights from sonar shadows the presence of higher parts of the wreck (such
as masts), which do not throw a detectable shadow, should always be borne in mind;
• shadow heights must be measured from both sides of the wreck and the results meaned - this
helps to correct for errors introduced by seafloor slope (it should be noted that heights
obtained in the near nadir area by this method may be overestimated by up to 20%);
• measurements for length and breadth should always be taken perpendicular to the towfish
track and must always be corrected for slant range distortions.
2.3.9.12 Conduct of Investigations. Investigations (or examinations) are conducted to improve the
classification of a contact located during an area search. The following technique is
recommended:
• relocate the contact by SSS, aiming to pass 50-100 m from it; this will normally be sufficient
to eliminate ephemeral contacts;
• verify and/or improve its position;
• conduct the examination.
2.3.9.13 The 150 m scale is usually best (use of the 75 m scale may result in the shadow from a large
contact extending off the trace). Speed should be kept to about 3 kt, to reduce distortions in the
record, with the towfish about 15 m clear of the seafloor. Providing good pictures are obtained,
four runs (comprising two perpendicular pairs) should be sufficient. In the case of wrecks, one
pair of tracks should be parallel to the long axis of the wreck and one pair perpendicular to it.
M-13
218
2.3.9.14 The above procedure will usually give sufficient data to determine whether an echosounder
examination is required and also will allow measurements of length, beam and height to be
made. The SSS should always be recovered before close sounding. If several contacts which
need sonar examination exist in the same general area, time can usually be saved by examining
the whole group with sonar before recovering the sonar and obtaining a least depth by echo
sounder.
2.3.9.15 Disproving Searches. Charted wrecks, obstructions or other dangerous features which have not
been located and examined during a survey must be disproved if possible. They will not be
removed from the chart without a positive statement from the surveyor in charge that this is
justified and why. The procedure for conducting a disproving search is outlined below:
• Features whose positions have been previously established but which cannot be found during
the survey need a very detailed investigation to disprove them. Such searches are to include
a sonar sweep in two directions at right angles to each other and a close echo sounder search
over a radius of between 0.5 and 2.5 Nautical Miles (NM) from the charted position.
Consideration might also be given to undertaking a wire sweep.
• When searching for an feature whose position is only known approximately [usually a (PA)
wreck], the sonar search should also be undertaken in two directions at right angles and
consideration should be given to extending the search over a radius of at least 2.5 NM, a
distance based on the statistical probability of such a search being successful. However, if
the surveyor is confident that the initial area search in one direction was entirely thorough,
and that the sonar equipment was operating satisfactorily, he may consider that a second
search in another direction is not necessary, having regard to the size and history of the
wreck concerned and the position in which it is alleged to lie. If, during the initial sonar
sweep, a magnetometer was also deployed and no marked magnetic anomaly was detected
within 2.5 NM of the charted position, this may be accepted as additional evidence that a
wreck with a predominantly ferrous content does not exist in the area.
• Searches for wrecks not within a regular survey area must be extended to a radius of at least
2.5 NM. Whether there is need to carry out a second sweep at right angles to the first will
depend on the same considerations as above.
2.3.9.16 Whatever the outcome of such searches, whether as part of a larger survey or as individual
examinations, the surveyor must report the findings in full with supporting records as necessary
and a positive recommendation as to future charting action.
2.3.10 Positions Errors of Sonar Contacts
2.3.10.1 During normal area surveys the surveyor's primary concern is to attempt to ensonify the entire
seafloor in order to detect any significant feature. Any features of significant size will then
usually be accurately fixed by echosounder.
2.3.10.2 However in some special surveys it is essential that as precise a position as possible is given for
each contact, particularly for small seafloor contacts. These will not necessarily be fixed by
echo sounder. It is thus necessary to consider all the errors accruing in the plotting of a contact
from SSS trace.
2.3.10.3 Uncertainties in the position of a contact will derive from the following (e.g. ±1 σ):
M-13
219
uncertainty in vessel position - 5.0 m

uncertainty in towfish position (see Note) - 10 m
variations due to assumed SV (1500 m/sec) - 1.5 m
resolution of paper trace. (0.75% range scale) - 0.75 m
errors due to seafloor slope - 1.0 m
therefore, total error (RMS) (1 sigma) = 11.4 m
Note: This can be an unknown quantity depending on use of a precision towfish tracking
system. Evidence suggests that the towfish can oscillate 20 m about the towing vessels track.
The value is also dependant on the depth and length of tow cable. An estimate of ±10 m is
therefore assumed.
2.3.10.4 The values given above are examples only and the list is not exhaustive. The surveyor should
consider the table of errors for each part of his survey and comment on them in the Report of
Survey, as is the case with echo sounder errors.
2.3.10.5 Uncertainty in the position of the towfish is the greatest potential source of error. Unless a
method of accurately positioning the towfish is employed, surveyors should make every effort
to minimise the offsets by planning tracks parallel to the prevailing tidal stream or current. If
this is not possible every opportunity must be taken to quantify the offset of the towfish to the
track by reference to seafloor features whose positions are known. If there is any risk that full
ensonification is not being achieved, the simplest solution is to close up the sonar lines,
accepting that this will result in a reduction in rate of effort.
2.3.11 Plotting and Measurements from Sonar Records
2.3.11.1 Layback. Layback is the distance astern of the navaid position that the towfish is assumed to be
(see Figure 4.6). In the normal course it can be computed as follows:
Fig. 4.6 “Side scan Layback”
Note: When the wire out exceeds 100 m, the bight of wire has a greater effect on the tow than
the hydrodynamic properties of the towfish.
Layback = DT + √ [WO2 - DS2]
M-13
220
where: DT = horizontal distance from fix point to tow point,

WO = amount of wire out from tow point, and
DS = depth of towfish below surface.
Note: When the wire out exceeds 100 m, the bight of wire has a greater effect on the tow than
the hydrodynamic properties of the towfish.
2.3.11.2 This assumes that the wire takes a straight line path from the tow point to the towfish.
Obviously this is a simplification; the wire is actually in an irregular catenary in both horizontal
and vertical planes.
2.3.11.3 Correction for Slant Range. Slant range may be corrected to horizontal range simply by use of
Pythagoras’ theorem. If the seafloor is sloping then a correction factor will have to be applied.
2.3.11.4 Geometry of Heighting from SSS. One of the most important capabilities of SSS is its ability
to enable the height of a feature to be measured from the length of its shadow on the sonar
trace. However, this capability depends on the SSS being operated at the correct height above
the seafloor and selection of the optimum range scale. The geometry of heighting from SSS is
shown at Figure 4.7.
Fig. 4.7 Heighting from Sidescan Sonar
Therefore, by similar triangles - H= Sxh

R+S
Where: H= height of the feature

S= length of feature shadow
R= slope range
h= height of towfish above seafloor
2.3.12 Multibeam Echo Sounders

2.3.12.1 For bathymetry the MBES has quickly proven its superior capabilities allowing it to provide (in
theory) 100% ensonification of the seafloor whilst meeting IHO specifications for bathymetry.
M-13
221
The fact than a MBES transducer is rigidly mounted to the hull of the survey vessel means that
its position may be calculated as accurately as that of the positioning system in use. Coupled
with the capability of forming discrete beams, MBES is becoming the tool of choice for
bathymetric surveys.
2.3.12.2 Given a MBES’s positional capabilities, subsequent passes over the same stationary feature
should yield exactly the same geo-referenced position. The small difference, if any, in the
contact’s position is of great advantage when looking for features which may be revisited for
purposes of in-situ identification either by ROV or diver. Unfortunately, however, the fixed
transducer results in broad grazing angles which are not conducive to real time feature detection
using the same shadow-casting principles of the SSS. Detection, therefore, must focus on
variations in the resultant bathymetry caused by a feature on the seafloor.
2.3.12.3 Survey Methods. The requirements for a MBES survey where SSS is towed simultaneously are
similar to the requirements for a traditional SBES. The use of a regular series of parallel
straight lines remains the most efficient way of covering a survey area. The line direction will
probably be determined by the SSS requirement that the direction is close to the direction of the
tidal stream. One difference with the MBES is that since the system collects data in a matrix
that is as dense along the line as athwartships, there is no requirement to cross the contours at
right angles to determine their position accurately.
2.3.12.4 Line spacing for the sonar lines is determined as usual by the range scale in use and the overlap
required. The difference here is that almost certainly 100% coverage will be specified for
bathymetry as well. In shallow depths, under say 30 m the line spacing required to achieve
100% bathymetric coverage with the MBES may be less than that required for SSS. It will be
for the surveyor to determine if it is more efficient to complete the SSS coverage as normal, and
then to run interlines using MBES alone where required, or to complete the MBES coverage on
the first pass.
2.3.12.5 Where multibeam determines the line spacing, the required spacing will depend on the average
and minimum depths in an area. The multibeam swath width is depth dependant. Where the
depth varies significantly over the survey area, it may be more efficient to split the complete
area into subsections and to run each subsection at a line spacing appropriate to its depth.
Current recommendations are to achieve an average overlap between adjacent swaths of 25%
with a minimum overlap of 10%.
2.3.12.6 Where MBES alone determines the line direction for a survey, and where the sound velocity
profile throughout an area is similar, then the most efficient line direction is parallel to the
depth contour lines. In this way, the swath width and the overlap between adjacent swaths will
be more even and the line spacing can be wider.
2.3.13 Considerations when using Multibeam Echosounder
2.3.13.1 Despite early predictions and manufacturer’s claims, the detection of small and potentially
hazardous features by MBES cannot be taken for granted. For instance, even if the mast of a
wreck is ‘pinged’ by MBES, built in noise reduction algorithms will likely eliminate the
feature; whilst turning such filters down or off would introduce so much noise as to make the
data unusable.
2.3.13.2 Another fundamental factor is MBES beam geometry. The various makes and models are of
different design and, in some instances, leave relatively large gaps that are not ensonified
M-13
222
between beams. Interferometric MBES, for example, can suffer from poor feature detection in
the nadir area due, simply, to the physics of that type of system.
2.3.13.3 Surveyors must verify the performance of a MBES before it is employed for feature detection;
including determination of an appropriate swath width, ping rate, speed over ground etc. Many
agencies responsible for nautical charting still require the use of SSS for feature detection, with
MBES providing bathymetry and a check on SSS feature detection. MBES beam geometry and
feature detection potential is discussed in detail at “How Effectively Have You Covered Your
Bottom?” - Miller JE, Hughes Clarke JE, & Paterson J - The Hydrographic Journal No.83
January 1997.
2.3.14 Magnetometer
2.3.14.1 This instrument can prove very useful in differentiating wreck from rock if the wreck is ferrous.
A brief outline of the theory of operation of magnetometers can be found in the 1981 FIG/IHO
“Report on the Detection of Depth Anomalies”.
2.3.14.2 Whenever possible, a magnetometer should be used during the basic sonar sweep because this
will provide additional evidence of the existence of ferrous material on or below the seafloor,
although it cannot locate it precisely.
2.3.14.3 The intensity of the magnetic field from a ferrous feature falls off proportionally with the cube
of the distance from the feature. A general formula for computing the change in field in
nanoteslas (nT) to be expected as the magnetometer is displaced from the feature is:
M = 50,000 x W
D3
where: M= change in field intensity in nT,

W= weight of ferrous metal in tonnes,
D= distance of feature from detector in metres.
2.3.14.4 Generally, 5 nT is the smallest change of magnetic field intensity that can be reliably detected.
Then, for a change in intensity of 5 nT, the equation above can be written to give:
D = 3√10 000 x W
or, for a series of features:
Feature Detection Range

100 kg anchor - 10 m
1 tonne mine like object - 22 m
2 tonne cannon - 27 m
10 tonne wreck - 46 m
M-13
223
2.3.14.5 For example, during an area sweep with lines 125 m apart in a water depth of 50 m and with the
magnetometer towing 3 m below the surface, from the table above it can be seen that:
• a 100 tonne ferrous wreck will probably be detected from at least one of a pair of adjacent
lines and anything larger than 1000 tonnes should be detected on several lines;
• a 10 tonne ferrous wreck may just be detected directly below the magnetometer;
• anything smaller than 10 tonne is unlikely to be detected;
• a ship of about 1,000 tonne (ferrous metal) must tow the magnetometer 200 m astern or else
tabulated detection ranges will be seriously degraded.
2.3.14.6 Many magnetometers are designed to be towed very close to the seafloor. This will increase
the probability of detection of small ferrous features. However, care will have to be taken to
prevent fouling the SSS cable, a danger less evident with a surface towed magnetometer.
2.3.15 Other Methods of Feature Detection
2.3.15.1 Other sensors with potential for feature detection include:
Singlebeam Echosounder (SBES). Not normally employed for feature detection in shallow
water due to its relatively narrow beam width, which makes a full area search impracticable.
SBES can be used as a check on MBES which have poor nadir feature detection performance
and in deep water beyond the range of shallow water MBES. However, in all these instances
use of SSS for feature detection should be considered.
Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry. ALB systems such as LADS Mk.2 and CHARTS are capable of
a full area search and of detecting features two metres square. This means they can meet IHO
standards in clear waters suitable for ALB operations. Future development to further decrease
spot size to enable detection of smaller features is expected.
Airborne Electromagnetic Bathymetry. Originally designed for geophysical survey, AEM

methods offer the potential for feature detection but this capability has yet to be demonstrated
to IHO standards.
Forward Looking Sonars (FLS). Originally designed purely for navigation and collision
avoidance, some recent FLS developments offer bathymetric and feature detection capabilities.
To date, however, these capabilities have not been demonstrated as meeting IHO feature
detection, but they may achieve low order bathymetry standards. They cannot currently be
considered a stand-alone hydrographic survey sensor.
2.3.16 Obtaining Definitive Least Depth over a Feature
2.3.16.1 The surveyor must establish the least depth over wrecks and obstructions and the following
guidance may assist in deciding upon the method of examination, i.e. obtaining the least depth.
Whichever method is employed, the opinion of the surveyor as to the accuracy of the least
depth obtained is of vital importance and must be stated in the Report of Survey. If a least
depth is not achieved, the examination must still result in positive recommendations regarding
the likely accuracy of the depth obtained and future charting action.
M-13
224
2.3.16.2 The horizontal and vertical accuracy of a least depth must reflect the accuracy criteria detailed
for the survey as a whole and, in turn, those standards in IHO S-44 and/or S-57.
2.3.17 Echosounder Least Depth
2.3.17.1 The least depth may be obtained by saturation SBES sounding. The required line spacing is to
be calculated from knowledge of the echo sounder beam width and general depths in the area,
allowing an overlap of at least 25% between lines. Attention is drawn to chapter 3, paragraph
4.5, with regard to calculating the area ensonified by single beam echosounders.
2.3.17.2 Alternatively, MBES may enable the least depth to be obtained. However, as noted previously,
if MBES is employed the surveyor must be certain that the system’s capabilities are such that
the definitive least depth is able to be determined. This is particularly the case if the least depth
is over a mast or similar feature. Considerations here include the beam width and spacing,
speed over ground, optimum part of the swath (i.e. nadir, inner or mid swath) to be placed over
the feature, number and direction of passes required. It may be, however, that MBES is best
employed to identify the boundary of a feature to enable a first-pass or, at least, a less extensive
SBES examination to determine the least depth.
2.3.18 Use of Divers
2.3.18.1 An alternative is the use of divers, assuming visibility, strength of tidal stream and depth of the
feature allow their employment. Where divers can be employed, ships should plan to allow
sufficient time for the task to be completed safely and accurately. If depth gauges are used to
determine depth, the accuracy of the gauges should be determined. The least depth over a
feature can usually be obtained by divers in less than an hour, whereas a wire drift sweep can
often take four hours or more.
2.3.18.2 In certain circumstances, the surveyor will be directed to use divers. If the least depth is likely
to be less than 30 m, the use of a diver must be considered. If a wreck has been wire swept or
investigated by diver within the last five years, its position is unchanged and echo sounder
depths over it show no significant alteration, the use of divers should not be necessary.
2.3.18.3 Where general depths around the wreck are markedly different from those charted or when it is
known that salvage/dispersal work has taken place since the last survey, the use of divers may
be necessary.
2.3.18.4 If SSS traces indicate the vessel to be lying on its side or with its keel uppermost and several
consistent echo sounder depths have been obtained, further investigation should not be
necessary. However, if there is any possibility that there are projecting structures which may
not have been revealed on sonar or echo sounder, then divers should be used.
2.3.18.5 Areas charted as ‘foul’, especially in an anchorage, need special consideration as seafloor
movement may expose debris not previously considered hazardous; a diver’s report is
especially useful in these circumstances.
2.3.18.6 In areas of strong tidal stream and mobile seafloor, wreckage may shift and it is possible for the
least depth over it to become markedly less. Wrecks in such areas should always be viewed
with suspicion and, where other evidence suggests it to be necessary, diving should be carried
out.
M-13
225
2.3.19 Other Methods
2.3.19.1 Other methods of obtaining the least depth over a feature include wire sweeping (see next
paragraph) and the use of autonomous and remote vehicles equipped with suitable sensors.
These, if nothing else, can be used to identify the shoalest point on a feature for subsequent
measurement. These methods are not described in detail here.
2.3.20 Methods of Wire Sweeping Wrecks
2.3.20.1 In many cases the only positive means of establishing the least depth over a rock pinnacle or
wreck is by use of a wire drift sweep. There are several methods:
2.3.20.2 Single Vessel Drift Sweep. This is a slow but accurate method which is, nevertheless,
impossible if wind and tide are at right angles and difficult if opposed. Wire angles must be
minimal and there must be no ahead or astern movement during drift. Surveyors using this
method should beware of the gentle foul, of leaving gaps in swept path and of excessive wire
angles.
2.3.20.3 The optimum situation for a single ship sweep:
• the wreck should be properly examined by echo sounder first;
• a marker buoy should be laid approximately one sweep width up tide of the wreck;
• angle of sweep to be less than 20°;
• no engines used, i.e. drifting;
• constant tension maintained on the sweep.
2.3.20.4 Two Vessel Drift Sweep. The procedure is similar to single vessel sweep. Considerations are:
• greater swept path than single vessel sweep (100-120 m maximum);
• need to know position of wing vessel;
• good vessel handling required;
• vessels to be stopped and drifting;
• sag (wire out) and lift (wire tension);
• greater tendency for vessels to roll;
• vessels will slowly pull together.
2.3.20.5 Accuracy factors include:
• sweep angle is caused by movement through the water and tension placed on wire sweep and
must be kept to a minimum;
M-13
226
• wire sag is affected by weight of the wire and the width of the sweep;
• greater tendency for vessels to roll, hence less accuracy than single ship drift sweep.
2.3.20.6 Underway or Drag Sweep.
2.3.20.7 Accuracy factors are:
• the sag tends to disappear due to wire lifting on movement through the water;
• variable tension of wire and drag speed means uncertain angle of sweep.
2.3.20.8 Drift and drag sweeping are discussed in detail in the “Admiralty Manual of Hydrographic
Surveying”, Volume 2, UK Hydrographic Office, 1969.
2.4 Side Scan Sonar records
2.4.1.1 This section outlines records associated with SSS. The surveyor is to be scrupulous in
confirming that there are no inconsistencies between any of the records.
2.4.1.2 Bridge records will vary from ship to ship depending on the type of data logging equipment in
use and preferences of the surveyor. However, it is recommended the following information
should be available to the sonar interpreter:
• date and time;
• speed over ground;
• base course and course over ground;
• ship’s head;
• wire out;
• remarks, including sea state.
2.4.1.3 Sonar Contact Book. This is the master record for all sonar contacts. Where applicable, it
should contain the following for each record evaluated:
• sonar roll number and associated echo roll (or digital equivalents);
• dates and times;
• contact number;
• position details;
• port/starboard;
• slope range;
M-13
227
• layback;
• height of towfish above seafloor;
• contact assessment, i.e. shadow, cross-talk, intensity, initial classification;
• further action required, i.e. investigate, interline, quick look, no further action (NFA) etc.;
• action complete with final classification and reference to associated wreck records if
appropriate.
2.4.1.4 The sonograph (if applicable) must be marked up simultaneously with the echo sounder trace
and should carry a comprehensive title. It should be remembered that the deck book and
sonograph may become separated and there is merit in including sufficient information in the
latter to enable it to stand alone for analysis and checking purposes.
2.4.2 Wreck Records
2.4.2.1 The accurate processing of wreck records is a time consuming task. The establishment of a
fool-proof procedure at the outset will often save confusion and errors later. The position and
details of individual wrecks may appear on several documents and great care is needed to
ensure that these records are both consistent and correct.
2.4.2.2 The surveyor must ensure that the following activities take place:
• working records are logged and systematically stored;
• all contacts are investigated and examined in an orderly way;
• wreck reports are completed where needed;
• all wrecks are plotted on both working and fair records;
• all positions and details are consistent.
2.4.2.3 Wreck data may appear in the following fair records:
• fair sheet (or digital equivalent) on completion;
• sonar track plot;
• seafloor texture tracing;
• annotated side scan and echo sounder traces (or digital equivalents, i.e. SSS contact
thumbnails);
• the Report of Survey.
2.4.2.4 Positional accuracy of wrecks. The position of a wreck in all records must be consistent. The
following procedure is recommended:
M-13
228
• select the best echosounder “on top”; determine the navaid readings for that position, either
from an “on top” fix or from the wreck investigation plot and convert this to latitude and
longitude to provide the master position;
• record the position taken during the best echosounder “on top”;
• plot the master position on the track plot, sonar contact plot, seafloor texture tracing and
sounding tracing (as appropriate);
• record the master position in the Report of Survey.
2.4.2.5 The Fair Sheet should show the position and least depth of each wreck located. If it has not
been possible to examine it fully, a danger circle in red should be inserted with the legend
“Wk(NFS)” – i.e. ‘not fully surveyed’. It is important that no depth should be inserted in the
circle as this may be mistakenly treated as the least depth during subsequent processing.
2.4.2.6 The sonar tracing is to show the position of each wreck using the appropriate symbols
contained in Chart INT 1.
2.4.2.7 Each listed wreck or obstruction is to be accompanied by representative examples of

echosounder and SSS traces illustrating the feature (screen images, if the echosounder does not
have paper trace). Traces are to be annotated with the date/time of fixes bracketing the feature,
the ship’s course and speed made good over the ground and, in the case of SSS traces, the
ship’s true course and the distance of the towfish from the point of fix. The least depth
obtained or calculated should also be inserted.
2.4.2.8 As much detail as possible is to be shown and should include the following:
• position in which the wreck was located, together with the horizontal datum of the survey;
• fix obtained - this is to indicate which corrections were applied;
• the least depth recorded, how it was obtained and whether the surveyor considers it to be
definitive - if the charted depth is different the surveyor should express his view as to the
reason for the difference, if the height of the wreck has been calculated from SSS traces, it
should be stated whether it is a mean of heights obtained from opposite directions;
• approximate dimensions and orientation, together with any evidence (e.g. a diver’s report)
about the wreck’s identity and condition;
• details of the tidal reduction used;
• general remarks, especially any correlation with other wrecks in the vicinity or listed;
existence and depth of scour; general depths and nature of seafloor.
2.4.3 Sonar Coverage Records
2.4.3.1 Whenever sonar is used during a survey, a tracing at the same scale as the Fair Sheet is to be
prepared to show the following data:
• vessel’s track whilst carrying out the sonar search,
M-13
229
• limits of the area searched by sonar,
• limits of areas closely examined (examination tracks need not be shown),
• positions and identifying numbers of all wrecks and obstructions located during the survey,
• positions and identifying numbers of all wrecks and featuress listed in the Report of Survey.
2.4.3.2 When a searchlight sonar has been used in conjunction with SSS, the tracing is also to include:
• areas of numerous echoes;
• all firm contacts and the direction in which they were obtained (ephemeral contacts should
not be shown);
• classification and quality of these contacts and whether examined.
2.4.3.3 All positions of contacts and wrecks are to be carefully cross-checked with other tracings,
forms and reports. The following symbols are to be used on sonar tracings:
wreck - Wk
wreck, not fully surveyed - Wk(NFS)
possible wreck - Wk(U) (see Note)
bottom - B
good sea floor contact - g
fair sea floor contact - f
swept wreck - |Wk|
Note: where it has not been possible to confirm the identity of a contact as a wreck, but it is
sufficiently strong to merit its classification as a ‘possible wreck’, the additional qualification of
“(U)” (unexamined) should be used to indicate an inconclusive examination. “(U)” should also
be used when a contact has not been examined at all. The classification of “Wk(U)” should
result in a wreck report.
2.4.3.4 Ship’s track and fixes. Where the ship’s track for sonar operations differs from those of main
sounding, sufficient fixes are to be identified and annotated on the tracing and should be
abbreviated except for the ends of line.
2.4.3.5 Limits of area searched. Green line for SSS, red line for searchlight sonar, and blue outline for
areas of intensive search (with result in manuscript or reference to other record).
2.4.3.6 Listed wrecks. Non-dangerous wreck symbol in black with Wreck List number.
2.4.3.7 Located wrecks. Black circle 5 mm in diameter.
2.4.3.8 When searchlight sonar alone has been used the tracing is to encompass the entire survey area
(ideally an overlay of the largest scale chart or topographic map covering the area). It is to
M-13
230
depict the limits of the area swept by searchlight sonar and may be combined with any other
tracing, providing clarity can be maintained. This information is used by the charting authority
in assigning data quality attributes.
2.4.3.9 Sonar tracings are to carry a clear and comprehensive key to the symbols used. In addition,
SSS tracings are to carry a table showing the operating specifications, including range scale,
mode (survey or search), beam depression and average towfish height.
2.4.3.10 Some of the data required above may be combined with other tracings provided their inclusion
does not interfere with the clarity of existing tracing.
3. SEAFLOOR CLASSIFICATION
3.1 Background
3.1.1 There are three requirements for seafloor classification, i.e. nautical charting, commercial/
environmental and military.
3.1.1.1 Nautical Charting. A relatively simple classification method is used for nautical charting and
navigational purposes; it is defined as determining the composition of the seafloor. A list of the
classifications is contained in Chart INT 1. The mariner needs this information:
• to decide where to anchor;
• to determine the type of holding ground and how much cable to use;
• to help assess the safety of an anchorage;
• to provide an additional check on navigation.
3.1.1.2 Commercial/Environmental. A more detailed classification, usually obtained using commercial

processing software and used for:
• offshore engineering e.g. siting oil platforms, beacons and sea walls,
• mineral exploration;
• fishing etc.
3.1.1.3 Military. A combination of four basic seafloor types with detailed and specific additional data
and attributes. Military users rely upon this information for:
• amphibious operations;
• mine countermeasures, i.e. selecting operating areas in order to avoid those of unfavourable
seafloor topography;
• submarine and anti-submarine operations, e.g.. selection of safe areas for submarines to take
the seafloor;
• sonar acoustic performance.
M-13
231
3.1.1.4 In future, military seafloor classification information is likely to be distributed to headquarters

and operational units in the form of Additional Military Layers (AML). These are able to be
read in embedded geographic information systems and command tactical decision making
systems.
3.1.2 Seafloor Classification Models
3.1.2.1 Information is normally presented as a seafloor classification model, examples of which are at
Fig 4.8. Data may be obtained by SBES, MBES, SSS and actual sampling, and is presented as
a mixture of symbols and words. Like all fair records the information must be accurately and
clearly plotted.
3.1.2.2 The following information is to be shown in seafloor classification models:
• natures of the seafloor from samples;
• texture of the seafloor from echo sounder, SSS etc.;
• seafloor contacts and features (i.e. wrecks, sand waves, trawl scours);
• depth contours.
Fig. 4.8 Example of Sidescan Sonar Mosaic and Classification Models

(using QinetiQ ‘Classiphi’ software)
3.1.2.3 Examples of Sonar Records. The problems in identifying wrecks on sonar records are well
known to surveyors and need no further amplification. Examples of sonar records for seafloor
classification comparisons can be found in “Sonagraphs of the Seafloor” by Belderson,
Kenyon, Stride and Stubbs.
M-13
232
3.1.3 Seafloor Samples
3.1.3.1 The nature of the seafloor is to be obtained in depths less than 200 m as follows:
• to assist with the interpretation of any SSS records;
• to provide ground truth and confirmation of seafloor classification models;
• in all likely anchorages;
• on all banks, shoals and seamounts, particularly when these are likely to be unstable, and in
the channels between them;
• on the summit and at the base of seamounts, in depths greater than 200 m, when depths are
not extreme and appropriate sampling methods are available.
3.1.3.2 In addition, the nature of the seafloor is to be obtained at regular intervals throughout the
survey ground. The frequency of sampling will vary, depending on the depth and the extent to
which it is homogeneous, with samples obtained at intervals of between 1.0 and 1.7 km in
depths less than 200 m.
3.1.3.3 The nature of the seafloor obtained from samples is to be included in the classification model.
The correlation between samples and the texture derived from the sonar record is very
important; it provides the only real confidence check on the interpretation. It follows that
seafloor samples must fulfil three conditions, i.e. they must be:
• a complete sample - underway samplers are known to lose much of the finer portions of the
sample as they are recovered;
• from an individual spot - underway samplers may be dragged for several hundred metres,
and cannot provide a “spot” sample;
• accurately positioned - samples must be fixed to the same accuracy as any other item of
survey information, with the fix taken as the sampler hits the seafloor.
3.1.3.4 To fulfil the above requirements samples must be taken by grab or corer with the ship stopped
and the fix obtained by the main survey navigation aid (or one of comparable accuracy). Their
position on the classification model is shown by a small dot surrounded by a circle, with the
classification positioned next to it.
3.1.4 Nature of the Seafloor
3.1.4.1 The seafloor is formed of rock of various types overlaid in most places by unconsolidated
sediments from two main sources:
• materials washed from adjacent land masses or from erosion of the seafloor itself;
• biologically produced sediments which are formed from decaying animal and vegetable
products within the ocean basins.
M-13
233
3.1.5 Classifying Samples
3.1.5.1 Classification entails describing a sample under two main headings:
• a descriptive adjective, such as ‘coarse’, ‘small’, etc.;
• a general description, such as ‘Rock’, ‘Mud’, etc.
3.1.5.2 Mixed Samples. Most natural sediments are rarely composed of only one type of sediment,
they are often a mixture. When this occurs, classification should follow the principle of listing
the most predominant material first, for example “fSbkSh” indicates that there is more sand in
the sample than there is shell.
3.1.5.3 Grain Size and Grading. Sediments are graded according to grain size at Table 4.5.
General
Name Limits (mm) Remarks
Description
when dried on hand, will not rub
Clay < 0.002
off easily.
Mud M
when dried on hand, will rub off
Silt 0.002 – 0.063
easily.
very fine Sand 0.063 – 0.125
fS
fine Sand 0.125 – 0.250
Sand mS medium Sand 0.250 – 0.50
coarse Sand 0.5 – 1.0
cS
very course sand 1.0 – 2.0
from thickness of standard
smG Granules 2.0 – 4.0
pencil lead to size of small pea.
Gravel
P Pebbles 4.0 – 64.0 small pea to clenched fist size.
lG Cobbles 64.0 – 256.0 clenched fist to man’s head size.
Boulders > 256.0 larger than a man’s head size.
Rock R
Rock
Table 4.5 “Sediment Grain Size”

(taken from the UKHO Hydrographic Quality Assurance Instructions for Admiralty Surveys)
3.1.5.4 The size of grain can be determined by eye or by comparison with standard samples illustrated
in a “comparator disk”, if held. The finer sediments are the hardest to classify. If size cannot
be classified with the naked eye or by comparison, the sample may be placed between the teeth.
If it feels gritty then it is silt; if it feels smooth and buttery in texture then it is clay. It is
extremely difficult to estimate the relative percentages when samples contain sand, silt and
clay.
3.1.5.5 Rock. A sample should only be classified as ‘rock’ if positive evidence is available. If the only
evidence held by the collector is a score or dent or damaged sampler, the abbreviation “h”
(hard) should be used.
M-13
234
3.1.5.6 Other Descriptions. Where additional qualities can be identified or the seafloor type can be
positively classified as comprising another distinct material, the various references should be
consulted for guidance.
3.1.6 Methods of Obtaining Seafloor Samples
3.1.6.1 Samples of the seafloor can be obtained by a variety of means, the most common are:
• lead lines;
• grabs;
• snappers and scoops;
• corers;
• dredges;
• divers;
• remotely operated vehicles (ROV) and submersibles;
• opportunity based sampling (e.g. from anchors).
3.1.6.2 Selection and use of the appropriate device will depend on the nature of the investigation, the
character of the seafloor, the depth of water and the shipboard equipment available for lowering
and retrieving sampling equipment.
3.1.6.3 Sounding Leads. The armed lead line is a traditional method of obtaining and indicating the
nature of the thin surface layer of the seafloor. It can give no idea of the depth of a surface
layer or what is underneath. Leads are armed with tallow or a similarly sticky substance such
as petroleum jelly or grease to which particles of sediment adhere. When the seafloor is strewn
with larger features such as pebbles or rock, an impression of the sea floor material may be
obtained but this cannot be guaranteed.
3.1.6.4 Advantages of the lead line are that it is cheap and simple to operate. Disadvantages are:
• larger material may not be detected (for example boulders);
• only the surface layer is sampled;
• sampling becomes unreliable as depths increase;
• the sample is contaminated by the material used for arming;
• the sample is disturbed when collected.
M-13
235
3.1.6.5 Grabs, Snappers and Scoops. These are supplied for the purpose of collecting medium size
samples of the surface and immediate sub-surface layer of the seafloor. They usually comprise
a bucket or scoop, which is activated on hitting the seafloor. Some are spring-loaded, others
close when raised off the seafloor. Grabs are rarely suitable for sampling soft or liquid mud as
the sample is often washed out of the bucket before it reaches the surface.
3.1.6.6 Shipek Grab. The Shipek Grab consists of two concentric half cylinders; the inner half cylinder
or sampling bucket is held open against a pair of powerful axial springs by a pawl. On striking
the seafloor a sliding weight trips the pawl and allows the bucket to rotate through 180° under
the torque of the springs. During this rotation the bucket scoops a sample from the seafloor.
The bucket then remains closed whilst the grab is hauled to the surface. The Shipek Grab is
most effective on soft and unconsolidated sediment. It is liable to bounce on a compacted
seafloor and the closing action of the bucket can lift the grab off the seafloor giving only a
superficial sample or none at all. In these conditions improved results can sometimes be
obtained by reducing the speed of impact of the grab on the seafloor.
3.1.6.7 Corers. These are used to obtain an undisturbed vertical sample of the seafloor. They often
penetrate a considerable distance below the seafloor surface. Corers usually comprise a tube or
box shaped cutting mechanism similar to an apple corer or pastry cutter. They are driven into
the seafloor and when withdrawn they retain an undisturbed sample of the sediment layers.
3.1.6.8 Retaining mechanisms vary from creating a vacuum on the back of the sample to cover plates
or shutters. Often there is a combination of methods to hold the sample in place. Corers may
be driven into the seafloor by a number of means - their own weight, explosives, pneumatics or
mechanical vibration.
3.1.6.9 Dredges. Dredges are designed to be dragged along the seafloor collecting loose material and
sediment. They often incorporate a filter that allows smaller sediments to pass through.
Samples are always disturbed but do reflect the seafloor materials over a reasonably large area.
Dredges can be deployed in all depths of water.
3.1.6.10 Other Sampling Methods
Divers. An inspection by divers allows a positive identification of the seafloor. Large as well
as small features can be identified. Divers are limited by the depth to which they can work but,
for shallow water and with time permitting, this is a good method of obtaining samples.
Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUV). Remotely operated UUV can assist in classifying the
seafloor either by collecting samples (usually scoop or grab) or by obtaining video images for
later inspection. UUV are increasingly being fitted with SBES, MBES and SSS and can be
employed to acquire the same data as that from surface vessels.
Opportunity Basis Sampling. Useful samples can also be obtained from ship’s cables, anchors
or buoy moorings. These samples must be used with some caution since only samples of a
clinging nature are likely to survive the washing action of equipment on its way to the surface.
M-13
236
3.1.7 Seafloor Sample Records
3.1.7.1 Seafloor Sample Log. Data should be formatted to assist in the archiving of relevant data and
such that it will be readily available for interested authorities. The Report of Survey is to
contain full details of the methods of sampling employed during a survey together with any
problems that may have been experienced.
3.1.7.2 The location and classification of seafloor samples obtained is to be shown on a tracing or
digital model accompanying the bathymetric data.
3.2 Classification Sensors
3.2.1 This section describes the various sensors used for seafloor classification.
3.2.1.1 Sidescan Sonar. In addition to locating wrecks and obstructions between survey lines, SSS also
provides a considerable amount of other seafloor information. These data, when combined
with seafloor samples and depth contours to produce seafloor classification models, are of great
value. The importance of this information has grown over the years to such an extent that, in
many surveys, sonar rather than bathymetric considerations govern the selection of line
direction and spacing. Great care is needed in the preparation and checking of these tracings if
their full potential is to be realised.
3.2.1.2 Multibeam Echosounders. The introduction of MBES in hydrographic surveying has meant not
only the ability to determine bathymetry more accurately and with greater coverage than before,
but also the ability to determine seafloor boundaries and sediment types relatively quickly and
effectively. With this in mind, the surveyor is now able to interpret the backscatter imagery
from swath systems as well as side scan imagery. The added benefit of obtaining backscatter
information from MBES, while collecting bathymetric data, allows a more cost (and time)
effective survey to be conducted.
3.2.1.3 Singlebeam Echosounders. Commercial seafloor classification software that is capable of

being fitted to SBES has been available for some years. Used particularly in the fishing
industry, a typical system is described below.
3.2.1.4 Other Methods. Other sensors with potential for seafloor classification include:
• Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry. Research is continuing into the extraction of information

other than bathymetry from the laser return waveform including turbidity and seafloor
classification.
• Airborne Electromagnetic Bathymetry. AEMB methods offer the potential to obtain

seafloor classification information but this capability has yet to be developed.
• Remote Sensing. Seafloor classification information can be obtained from satellite and
aerial imagery in shallow water but still requires ground truth data.
• Forward Looking Sonars (FLS). Originally designed purely for navigation and collision
avoidance, some recent FLS developments offer bathymetric and seafloor classification
capabilities. For example, the Thales Underwater Systems “Petrel” FLS matches the
M-13
237
energy of acoustic returns to the ambient noise level and beam angle of incidence on the
seafloor to provide a seafloor reverberation figure of merit which will be unique for varying
seafloor densities, materials and porosity. By ground-truthing these ‘figures of merit’ a
real-time swath seafloor classification capability is available in parallel to bathymetry.
3.3 Classification - Theory
3.3.1 This section introduces the collection and interpretation of backscatter information and
compares the methods used by MBES and SSS. The advantages and disadvantages of each are
discussed. It also covers the methods that the MBES uses to remove the distorting effects due
to the angle at which the signal hits the seafloor, and other causes.
3.3.1.1 SSS, and most MBES, can display a representation of the seafloor using the principle of
acoustic imaging. Most SSS pictures show relatively unsophisticated representations of the
returning ping in the sense that the image is only corrected for a limited range of measurable
parameters. For example, modern SSS receivers often have the ability to measure the forward
velocity of the vessel and adjust the along track axis of the image so that the scale in this
direction equates to the scale across track. Also, they can measure the height of the towfish
above the seafloor, and remove this portion from the image so that the image starts at the
seafloor underneath the towfish and covers the seafloor out to the maximum range of the set.
The image can be corrected so that the distance on the image equates to the distance on the
seafloor, however this is normally achieved by making the assumption that the seafloor is level.
Since this is in fact not the case, there will be distortions on the SSS image.
3.3.1.2 On the other hand, the provision of backscatter information is a by product of the bathymetric
data collection for a MBES. It is akin to the output of SSS and produces a representation of the
seafloor in terms of the intensity of the returning echo. The significant difference between the
two is that the MBES is measuring the depth concurrently with the backscatter information and
this allows for a more sophisticated level of display. The data on depth, when combined with
beam angle, effectively gives the position on the seafloor to which the backscatter information
relates and therefore provides a true geometric correction of the backscatter image.
3.3.2 Backscatter Imagery
3.3.2.1 The result of the MBES side scan imaging based on backscatter information is a mosaic
covering the seafloor which displays the backscatter intensity equating to each point on the
seafloor. There is normally an ability to combine backscatter and depth information so that
they are co-registered by position. Assuming the lines have been run appropriately, the
imaging should provide 100% coverage and it may be that the backscatter information covers
more than the bathymetry if beams have been invalidated for accuracy reasons. It is likely that
the extra backscatter information will not be used since it does not have depth information
associated with it, but it remains available just the same.
3.3.2.2 A certain amount of post-processing will have been carried out to normalise the backscatter
image to remove the distorting effects on the original signal return. The corrections will
depend on range (to correct for attenuation and beam spreading), source power (which should
be recorded with the echo information) and beam directivity - both transmit and receive, if this
varies over time. Additionally, there will be corrections to be applied that depend on the signal
path and the area that is ensonified. These are corrections for beam angle, ray path and local
seafloor slope which can all be combined into a grazing angle at which the signal hits the
M-13
238
seafloor. Figure 4.9 shows examples of scattering strength for different seafloor types at
different grazing angles.
Fig. 4.9 Examples of Scattering Strength

(from “High Frequency Ocean Environmental Acoustic Models Handbook”, October 1994)
3.3.3 Side Scan Registration
3.3.3.1 The correction of the image for position is termed side scan registration (as the term side scan is
often used with a MBES system to refer to the backscatter intensity image). The required
correction translates between the slant range given by the time of travel and the true seafloor
position, or at least a true distance from the point underneath the transducer to the feature patch
of seafloor.
3.3.3.2 As mentioned before, the method used with SSS images tends to be quite simplistic, but, using
the extra depth information available in MBES systems, knowledge of the sound velocity
profile and the attitude of the vessel at the point of transmission, the registration can be made
more accurate. A large part of the calculation has already been carried out to produce the
corrected depths in the bathymetry application of the MBES and sometimes that information
can be made available to the side scan image.
3.3.4 Mosaicing
3.3.4.1 The transformation of the MBES side scan image into a regular raster image is called
mosaicing. The image will be positionally corrected for the movement of the vessel; however
there may still be some problems with the mosaicing procedure. In some MBES, the small
footprint size in the central beams may leave small gaps between each individual footprint. The
aim with the side scan image is to produce a regular raster image that allows direct comparison
of one point with another and gaps in data may make this difficult. It may be possible to fill in
the gaps by interpretation.
M-13
239
3.3.4.2 If coverage is in excess of 100% and there is overlapping of data, it is likely that the data will
have been collected at different angles and directions of ensonification. Rather than attempt to
combine the data, the data from the preferred beam is accepted whilst the other beam is
suppressed. There will inevitably be a discontinuity where the two swaths meet but the above
method minimises the distortion this will cause. There are various methods available that can
automatically choose the preferred beam, for example giving preference to the mid-beam over
the nadir and the far range.
3.3.4.3 The interpretation of the backscatter image will therefore depend on knowledge of the
information that the system retains and its method of presenting the data. Some systems have
the ability to retain information on the distribution of data within the beam, so detail that is
smaller than the beam footprint can still be seen. Other methods use a reduced data set,
retaining (for example) only the average or the peak intensity for each beam, which provides
less detail. Figure 4.10 shows that the bathymetry alone does not provide the same information
on the change in seafloor type as the raster backscatter mosaiced image.
Fig. 4.10 Seafloor Imagery - Bathymetry (left) v.

Raster Backscatter Mosaiced Image (right)
3.3.5 Classification - General
3.3.5.1 There are further complications when attempting to classify the type of seafloor. Different
acoustic impedance characteristics of the seafloor will affect the shape and the characteristics of
the return. If the seafloor is rough, but with detail smaller than the beam footprint, then this
will have an influence on the intensity of the return.
3.3.5.2 The only way to truly allow for these different effects is to have full knowledge of the seafloor
in advance and this is only possible where actual ground truthing (i.e. seafloor sampling) has
occurred. However, certain types of seafloor will have different general characteristics; hence
the backscatter may be used to conduct general classification. If particular returns are matched
by ground truthing, then a ‘library’ of backscatter classes can be built up, enabling automatic
classification. This library can be as complex as required with different areas of the
M-13
240
roughness/hardness graph assigned unique classifications. There are a number of different

software tools for this purpose although each will likely have a different procedure and
requirements to perform its task.
3.3.5.3 Classification of the seafloor using the acoustic image is a rapidly developing field. Initial
advances were made with the use of vertical incidence systems (SBES), where the method was
to study all the parameters of the returning echo, including the variation in intensity over time
and the frequency scatter graph, to provide an indication of the sea floor type.
3.3.5.4 The requirement for seafloor classification depends on the final use of the information. In
return, the particular parameters that are used to identify a particular seafloor type may depend
on the classification requirement. Typical characteristics that may be measured are the type of
seafloor in traditional hydrographic terms, which would classify the seafloor in terms of the
grain size, texture and type. Other characteristics may be physical properties of the seafloor
that may be relevant for, say, a pipeline survey, or acoustic properties that may be of interest to
minewarfare, anti-submarine warfare, and oceanographers. These include:
• sediment type, i.e.:
- grain size, texture, i.e. sand, silt, clay, gravel;
- mineralogy, i.e. ash, clay, silica, carbonate;
- genetic, i.e. biogenous, terrigenous;
• physical properties, i.e. grain size, density, and porosity;
• acoustic properties, i.e. velocities, attenuation;
• geotechnical properties, i.e. shear strength, elastic moduli;
• morphology, i.e. texture and relief.
3.3.5.5 Various approaches have been taken to the problem of seafloor classification, focusing on
different properties of the returning signal and with different methodologies to achieve the
result. In order to achieve this remote classification we look at systems and models developed
for the interaction of sound with the seafloor and the effect that this interaction should have on
the pulse shape. One such system adopted for seafloor classification using SBES is RoxAnn,
developed by Marine Microsystems Ltd.
3.3.6 RoxAnn
3.3.6.1 RoxAnn is one of a number of commercial seafloor classification systems that is connected, in
this instance, to existing echosounders (typically vertical incidence systems) by means of a
“head amplifier” which matches the impedance of the system to that of the echosounder. The
design was based on observations of echosounder performance in known areas of different
seafloor types. Sediment classification is accomplished by the identification of two parameters
(see Figure 4.11):
• E1 - the integrated energy under the tail of the first return, i.e. roughness;
M-13
241
• E2 - the integrated energy under the second (multiple) return, i.e. hardness
E1 gate for roughness index.

E2 gate for hardness index.
signal
amplitude
E1 E2
time
Tx pulse 1st echo 2nd echo
Fig. 4.11 “RoxAnn - Quantification of Roughness (E1) & Hardness (E2)”
3.3.6.2 Then, by use of a look-up table which will graph hardness against roughness, you can enter an
observed value that has been ground-truthed and calibrate the system for automatic
classification in that locality. The system requires periodic recalibration and will also require
recalibration when moving to a new area. Figure 4.12 shows values of E1 and E2 plotted, and
then a ‘known’ seafloor type allocated.
E1
rough
coral
rock
sand
clay
smooth mud
E2
soft hard
Fig. 4.12 “RoxAnn - Values of E1 and E2 (example only)”
3.3.6.3 The advantages of this system are that it is relatively simple and inexpensive. The
disadvantages are that the system is not quantitative, it must be calibrated and it depends on
multiple returns which raises the question about variability as a function of sea state.
3.3.7 Classification using Multibeam Echosounder
3.3.7.1 MBES provide us with both geo-referenced measurements of the instantaneous back-scatter
intensity, and spot estimates of seafloor elevation (soundings). Both of these can be used,
either together or separately, to attempt seafloor classification, usually in conjunction with
commercial software packages designed for that purpose. For those systems which are
M-13
242
calibrated, or for which at least a relative calibration can be performed, the backscatter intensity
measurements can be reduced according to:
• the range to feature (attenuation and spherical spreading);
• source power, beam directivity (transmit and receive);
• area ensonified (beam angle, refracted ray path, local seafloor slope).
3.3.7.2 There are three main methods employed in swath sonar seafloor classification based on the
variability in the echo structure to infer information on the nature of the seafloor:
• texture mapping and spectral estimation;
• echo amplitude peak probability density function;
• acoustic backscatter angular dependence functions.
3.3.8 Textural Mapping
3.3.8.1 This method looks at the variation of backscatter intensity as a function of 2D space (horizontal
dimensions). It is based on the identification of significant changes in the characteristics of the
echoes both within a ping and over a number of consecutive pings. In essence, it is the
estimation of the 2D spatial statistics of an acoustic backscatter amplitude image of the
seafloor.
3.3.8.2 Even in the absence of a calibrated sonar system, it is easy to see that the textural characteristics
of SSS imagery contain information about the seafloor. Most early SSS were developed for the
purpose of feature detection, in which the aim was to use the full dynamic range of the display
device, generally a wet paper recorder or graphical monitor, to maximise the contrast in the
returned echo. For this purpose automatic gain controls were developed. The detrimental side
of this development was that, in most cases, the absolute level of the backscattered intensity
was not preserved. Nevertheless, such a signal processing technique was ideal for bringing out
textural information in the imagery. This has been achieved by the introduction of two
methods:
• power spectra;
• grey level co-occurrence matrices.
3.3.9 Power Spectra
3.3.9.1 The seafloor acoustic backscatter changes roughly as the cos2 of the angle of incidence
(Lambert’s Law) out to low grazing angles. Therefore, it can be assumed that the variations in
the amplitude of seafloor echoes received by the sonar over this angular sector are expressions
of the inherent roughness of the backscattered surface. This would indicate the possibility of
classifying these returns, and hence infer seafloor types, based on their spectral shape.
3.3.9.2 When applied to MBES, this method must be limited to the outer segment of the swath where
the angular dependence of seafloor acoustic backscatter levels off and where the length of the
instantaneous ensonified area is relatively constant across-track. In the near vertical incidence
M-13
243
region a combination of the high aspect ratio of the hull-mounted sonar, the rapidly changing
size of the ensonified area and the regular angular dependence function of acoustic backscatter
put severe limitations on the assumption that spectral shape directly relates to seafloor type.
3.3.9.3 In addition, because the time series of backscatter strength obtained with a MBES configuration
is actually a composite of several beam traces, there is the possibility of introducing energy into
the power spectrum at spatial wavelengths equivalent to the beam spacing.
3.3.9.4 As you move between shallower and deeper water, the pulse length of many shallow water
swath systems is varied. This changes the instantaneously ensonified area and the length scales
that can be observed with the power spectra.
3.3.10 Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrices
3.3.10.1 To identify boundaries of like texture patterns in the side scan image, the classic image
processing techniques of Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrices (GLCM) is used. This technique
characterises the 2D spatial inter-relationships of the grey levels (where the darkness of the
grey refers to the intensity of backscatter) in an image with a scale ranging from fine texture,
corresponding to frequent level changes over short distances, to coarse texture corresponding to
few level changes over long distances. Co-occurrence matrices are computed for a set of
distances and angular spatial relationships. Each GLCM will correspond with a different
texture, which can then be interpreted as a seafloor type.
3.3.10.2 One drawback of the GLCM method is that it must be implemented on a side scan mosaic,
which is a raster product. As discussed, the mosaicing process is a compromise between
preserving the across track resolution of the backscatter amplitude data and honouring the
along-track resolution. Thus the side scan mosaics commonly are averaged (or median filtered)
versions of the raw intensity data. As such, they cannot exhibit the same statistical
characteristics as the original raw data. Therefore, the characteristics used for classification are
only applicable to data that has undergone exactly the same transformation from a raw side
scan time series to a raster product. In addition, some form of ground truthing is required to
identify the sea floor type because there are no models that link GLCM to specific seafloor
physical properties and different lithology’s (seafloor characteristics) can exhibit the same
textural characteristics.
3.3.11 Echo Amplitude Peak Probability Density Function
3.3.11.1 Echo Amplitude Peak Probability Density Function (PDF) seafloor acoustic backscatter is a
reverberation process whose stochastic (statistical) behaviour can be described by the Gaussian
distributed instantaneous quadrature samples, with an envelope (echo amplitude) distributed
according to a Rice probability density function and a phase uniformly distribution.
Remembering that the end members of the Rice PDF are a Gaussian shape when the returned
signal is mostly coherent and a Rayleigh shape when it is mostly scattered, it is possible to
derive a measurement of coherence from the statistics of the envelope. Figure 4.13 shows a
comparison of Rayleigh and Gaussian statistical curves, measuring the probability of an echo’s
amplitude.
M-13
244
RAYLEIGH
DISTRIBUTION
GAUSSIAN
DISTRIBUTION
AMPLITUDE OF RETURNED SIGNAL
Fig. 4.13 “Comparison of Rayleigh and Gaussian Curves”
3.3.11.2 The mean and the variance of instantaneous amplitude values are dimensional quantities and
thus imply that the sonar system must retain at least the relative changes in backscattered
amplitudes of the echoes. Any changes in source power and/or receiver gain settings can be
taken into account (compensation for automatic gain control). Swath backscatter amplitude
data (side scan) presented as mean amplitude is easy to understand as a classification tool.
Approximately constant mean amplitude over a region suggests a homogenous seafloor type
and gross changes in mean amplitude suggest changes in the seafloor. However, presentations
of regional changes in seafloor backscatter amplitude generally ignore, or try to empirically
normalise for, changes in the ensonification geometry (grazing angles) across the swath.
3.3.11.3 This fitting of the observed PDF against the standard models is performed on normalised echo
PDFs, thus the absolute mean amplitude of backscatter is ignored in the process. The method is
to attempt to separate out the ratio of coherent and incoherent components in the data. With
data from a calibrated sonar system, the normalised step can be skipped and the absolute
amplitudes used instead.
3.3.12 Angular Dependence
3.3.12.1 There are a number of models that predict the angular dependence of seafloor acoustic
backscatter based on several factors (generating parameters). These include the impedance
contrast of the sediment-water interface, the statistics of the roughness of that interface and any
possible contributions from volume inhomogeneities within the sediment layers. The quantity
of interest in this method is the backscattering strength per unit solid (3D) angle. This is
obtained from the measurement and compared to model predictions to estimate the generating
parameters.
M-13
245
3.3.12.2 High aspect ratio systems such as MBES provide measurements of the backscattered amplitude
at grazing angles ranging from 90° (vertical) through grazing angles as low as 15°. This is in
contrast to the distribution of grazing angles recovered by deep-towed, low aspect ratio SSS,
which tend to be biased to very low angles.
3.3.12.3 Commensurate with this method is the requirement to know the ray path of the acoustic energy
as it strikes the seafloor and the 3D slope of the seafloor interface that it strikes. This leads to
assigning an instantaneous measure of backscatter amplitude to that angle. In order to arrive at
a good estimate of the mean backscatter strength at that grazing angle, a large number (>10) of
instantaneous measurements are used. This obviously assumes the seafloor under investigation
is not changing over the length of the MBES swath (i.e. the seafloor type is the same from nadir
to the far range).
3.3.13 Acoustic Backscatter Data Interpretation
3.3.13.1 In the first instance, interpretation of a digital side scan image is often difficult. At the very
limit of resolution is the single instantaneous sample of backscatter intensity. This is derived
from a complex sum of all the individual scattered contributions from within the ensonified
area and also the scattered contributions from the volume of sediment below the ensonified
area. Notwithstanding the derived solution, there are three main effects that are noticeable in
any side scan mosaic:
• variations in backscatter strength due to changing seafloor type;
• variations in backscatter strength due to changes in seafloor slope;
• true cast shadows.
3.3.13.2 For conventional SSS the first two are ambiguous. There is no way to unambiguously tell
whether fluctuations are due to slope or texture. In reality it is rare to see a significant change
in the seafloor slope without a change in texture. In contrast to conventional SSS, swath sonar
systems can resolve the ambiguity for those cases where the topographic wavelength is greater
than the beam spacing, although roughness at shorter wavelengths cannot be resolved.
3.3.13.3 True cast shadows can be recognised by both systems as long as the signal-to-noise ration is
high enough - thus the drop in signal strength is greater than that expected for any real sediment
type. Interestingly, swath sonars cannot predict the presence of a shadow from the topographic
information alone. This is because a shadow implies slopes steeper than the ray path and thus
swath sonars cannot see behind the shadowing feature. This is important to remember when
using side angular sectors. Steep topography facing away from the sonar is not adequately
resolved and thus the resulting derived terrain model will be distorted. Even with swath sonars,
it is often not clear whether short wavelength variations in seafloor backscatter are a result of
either of the above effects. The only way to resolve this is to image the seafloor from multiple
near-orthogonal directions.
3.3.13.4 First and foremost, the surveyor is concerned about verifying potential hydrographic hazards on
the seafloor. Any confirmation or denial of the validity of an anomalous sounding represents
an aid in the interpretation of the data. This ultimately allows greater confidence in the quality
of the sounding data which will appear on a navigation chart. As we have seen there are
resolution limitations to high-speed MBES imagery, which means that you cannot always
M-13
246
resolve the discrete hydrographic anomalies that are of interest. This lends to the discussion of
deploying conventional, towed SSS in conjunction with a swath sonar system.
3.3.13.5 When the beam reaches the seafloor some of the beam is reflected back in the form of an echo,
but much of the energy is scattered in all directions, and some is even absorbed into the
seafloor. The vertical incidence case is concerned mainly with the reflection properties of the
seafloor, and again, different characteristics of the echosounder beam have an effect on the
amount of the signal that is reflected. The frequency of the signal is one of the most important
attributes in this respect. The MBES case is more complicated and the scattering properties of
the seafloor take on a larger importance.
3.3.13.6 Returns from a smooth hard seafloor. As the sound wave travels through the water, it moves by
displacing water particles, causing them to vibrate and so allow the passage of the wave. The
water has a low acoustic impedance, or a low resistance to the movement of the wave. When
the wave reaches the seafloor however, the seafloor has a high acoustic impedance and does not
allow the sound wave to continue into the seafloor. The particles are densely packed and are
not able to move easily. Since the total energy must be maintained and the energy cannot pass
into the seafloor in the form of a sound wave, it must go somewhere and the result is that it is
radiated back into the water. Some, probably a small percentage, will be reflected back in the
direction of the incoming wave and will travel back to be received at the sonar transducer as an
echo.
3.3.13.7 Effects of different types of seafloor and differing angles of incidence. Different types of
seafloor will have different levels of acoustic impedance. If the level is low then some of the
sound energy is absorbed into the seafloor and the returning echo will be weaker. If the level is
high then more is reflected. Similarly, the intensity of the reflected signal is also dependant on
the angle of incidence. If the angle is high, approaching 90°, then a large part of the sound
wave will be reflected back towards the sonar. If the angle is low then the major part of the
sound wave will be scattered in a direction away from the transducer, however some will still
return as a weak echo.
3.3.13.8 The type of seafloor will have an effect on the returning signal as well. The relationship
between the angle of incidence, the type of seafloor and the level of the returning signal is not a
straightforward one. For the beam arriving at a low level of incidence, if the seafloor is rough
then there will be more faces that are near to a right angle to the incoming sound wave and
therefore give a stronger reflection. A smooth seafloor will in general result in more of the
signal being scattered in other directions and not back in the direction of the sonar receiver. For
a high angle of incidence, however, the situation is likely to be reversed and a smooth seafloor
may give a better return. This will however depend on a number of factors such as particle size
and the composition of the seafloor.
3.3.14 Military Classification Models
3.3.14.1.1 In preparing a military classification (or texture) model from the sonar records the first task for
the surveyor is to decide whether the texture of the seafloor is mud, sand, gravel or rock. It is
appreciated that the seafloor contains a wide variety of combinations of the four basic
categories, but more detailed analysis is best undertaken by written descriptions. Clearly
defined boundaries between different types of seafloor should be shown as firm lines and ill-
defined limits should be depicted as pecked lines. Figure 4.14 shows an example of a military
classification model.
M-13
247
Fig. 4.14 Example Military Seafloor Texture Model
M-13
248
3.3.14.2 The graphic representation of the seafloor texture should be amplified by use of written
descriptions. Examples of the terms to be used, together with their definitions follow. It is
stressed that these are not exhaustive; other words may be used providing the meaning is clear
to all who may use the information. Descriptions of “negative” features (for example “flat
featureless sand”) are as useful as information on more prominent characteristics. Written
descriptions should be kept brief.
3.3.14.3 Features such as wrecks, sand-waves, trawl scours and pipelines also form an important part of
the description of the seafloor. These features are invariably more important than written
descriptions and in congested areas their inclusion should take priority.
3.3.14.4 Sandwaves are a common feature of seafloor topography and may occur either as isolated
features or in fields. Different symbols are used for each type:
• Isolated sandwaves. To ensure accuracy, the position of the crest of the wave must be
plotted from the echo-trace and not from the sonar record. The symbol for an isolated
sandwave is then to be positioned along the line of the crest. If the wave is asymmetric, a
small arrow is to be inserted pointing down the steeper side of the feature, the arrow should
be omitted if the wave is symmetrical. Details of the height of the crest above the trough
should be included.
• Sandwave fields. Many sandwaves occur in groups with similar height and orientation.
Under these conditions individual waves need not be plotted. The extent of the field should
be delineated, again referring to the echo-trace for accuracy and the symbol for a sandwave
field inserted. The orientation of the crests should be indicated, as should the wavelength,
height, symmetry and the steeper side.
3.3.14.5 For plotting purposes, a sandwave is defined as having a height greater than one metre.
Features smaller than this should be classed as ripples. The wavelength is defined as the
distance between two adjacent crests; the height is the difference in depth between a crest and
its adjacent trough. As a rule of thumb, crests which plot closer together than one centimetre
on paper and are similar in orientation, height and wavelength should be considered a field.
Ripples are often superimposed on waves and may have a different orientation a brief written
description such as “Ripples 120/300” should be placed next to the sand-wave symbol.
3.3.14.6 Small sea floor contacts. All non-ephemeral contacts larger than one metre must be plotted.
Where more than five such contacts exist per square centimetre the area may be delineated and
a notation made. Wherever possible the number of contacts in each area should be stated,
written descriptions may be included where useful.
3.3.14.7 Wrecks and obstructions. All wrecks and obstructions located during the survey must be
included in the classification model. Wrecks are to be shown by the “non dangerous” wreck
symbol, oriented in the same direction as the wreck. The extent and direction of any scour is to
be noted, e.g. ‘Scour 155/50m’. Other obstructions are to be shown using the “foul” symbol,
with a written description if possible, e.g. ‘wellhead’.
3.3.14.8 Small depressions. Certain areas of seafloor may contain small depressions, distinguishable on
the sonar trace by the “shadow” being in front of the contact. Some may show a pronounced
lip and include “pock-marks”. Unless their origin is known (for example if an oil-rig is moved
during a survey) classification should not be attempted.
M-13
249
3.3.14.9 Trawl scours. In many areas, trawl scours are a frequent and distinctive part of the seafloor.
Their importance is increased by the fact that they are most often met in otherwise flat areas.
Isolated trawl scours are to be shown individually; concentrations of them may be delineated
and the wording "numerous trawl scours" inserted.
3.3.14.10 Pipelines. All pipelines detected during a survey are to be plotted. Areas of buried pipe should
not be interpolated unless they are visible on the SSS trace, in this event the word “buried” is to
be inserted as required. Pipes which stand proud of the seafloor are to have their height in
metres noted at intervals.
3.3.14.11 Depth contours. Contours are to be included with the normal vertical interval being five
metres. In areas where a large range of depth occurs this may be expanded at the discretion of
the surveyor, providing the presentation of the “form” of the texture is maintained. The
purpose of drawing the depth contours is to assist the surveyor in his interpretation of the
sonograph.
3.3.14.12 Descriptions for use on Military Seafloor Classification Models:
Sandwaves. Straight or sinuous ridges of sand commonly aligned across the dominant tidal
stream or current. Minimum height is one metre. Crest separation (wavelength) can be up to
1000 m with heights reaching 20 m. May be symmetrical or asymmetrical, and may have
ripples on them.
Ripples. Small ridges of sand, similar in shape to sandwaves but with a height of less than one
metre. Usually orientated transverse to the tidal or current flow with wavelength of less than 15
m. May not be detectable with an echo sounder.
Furrows & Ridges. Longitudinal bed-forms in gravel, sand or mud, some of which can be 9 km
long and up to 14 m wide. They may be solitary, but more usually occur in groups. They are
generally parallel to the prevailing currents.
Sand Ribbons. Normally apparent overlying a coarser type of seafloor. Most are straight and
parallel with currents. Can be up to 15 km long, 200 m wide and are generally only a few
centimetres thick. Typically have a "laddered” appearance due to the presence of ripples.
Gravel/ Sand/ Mud Patches. Thinly-spread patches of gravel, sand or mud no more than 100 m
across and commonly less than 2 m thick. May be depositional and subject to movement.
Shape may be determined by the relief of the underlying seafloor.
Rock Outcrop. A patch of rock covering a small area. Refers to a cohesive group, not a
collection of boulders.
Pinnacle. A rock of limited horizontal extent with height considerably greater than surrounding
rocks.
Ledge. Rock outcrop with length in excess of 300 m and relatively narrow in comparison.
Often found in groups, with similar direction and extent.
M-13
250
Bank. Usually of sand or gravel, but may be of rock. A rise in the seafloor over a relatively
small area, but fairly prominent in relation to its surroundings. When formed of sediment it is
often oriented along the tidal flow.
Large/ Small. Preferred to big, great, high/little, slight, mini, etc.
Broad/ Narrow. Used to express width when qualifying such features as sand ribbons. Broad
should only be used for ribbons over 150 m wide, narrow for those less than 10 m wide.
Smooth. Preferred to even or level, and may refer to a seafloor that is either flat or sloping.
Will usually refer only to mud.
Flat. Must only be used to describe level surfaces (i.e. no significant gradient).
Sloping. Refers to any area where there is a general trend in the depth of the seafloor, i.e. a sea
floor gradient. A sloping seafloor may be smooth but cannot be flat.
Gentle. Gradual, slowly changing.
Regular. Used to qualify a series of features which are uniform in amplitude and wavelength,
i.e. sandwaves, ridges.
Irregular. Used to qualify features which are not uniform but do have a specific entity, i.e.
sandwaves. Can also be used to describe an area of rock where no regular structure is evident.
Prominent. Used to describe a feature or series of features which is or are very obvious in
relation to their general surroundings.
Featureless. Applied normally to either a flat or smooth seafloor where the featureless aspect is
either unusual or of considerable extent.
M-13
251
3.3.14.13 Symbols for use on Military Seafloor Classification Models are at Figure 4.15:
Rock exposure
Gravel
Sand
Mud
Clearly defined seafloor texture boundary
Ill-defined seafloor texture boundary
Sand-wave crest with crest-to-trough height in metres, symbol denotes

direction of steepest side
Sand-wave areas (with height, orientation, wavelength and symmetry;

A = Asymmetrical; S = Symmetrical)
Prominent trawl scour
Area of concentrated trawl scours
Significant sonar contact
Patch of highly reflective seafloor without significant height or extent
Pockmark
Position of seafloor sample with abbreviated description and identifying
number if retained
Wreck, orientated as appropriate, with direction and extent of scour
Foul or obstruction (with classification if applicable)
Submerged well
Pipeline
Seafloor contour at 5 m vertical intervals.
Fig. 4.15 Symbols for use on Military Seafloor Classification Models
M-13
252
REFERENCES
1987 “The Use of Side Scan Sonar for Hydrographic UK Hydrographic Department
Surveying and the Gathering of Bottom Texture Professional Paper No. 24
Information”
1990 “Sound Underwater Images” – A Guide to the Fish JP & Carr HA
Generation and Interpretation of Side Scan
Sonar Data.
1994 “High Frequency Ocean Environmental Acoustic Washington University Seattle
Models Handbook” Applied Physics Lab
1997 “Admiralty Manual of Hydrographic Surveying” UK Hydrographic Office
1998 “Side Scan Versus MBES Object Detection - A Brissette MB &
Comparative Analysis” Hughes Clarke JE
2001 “LEEUWIN Class Operating System” Australian Hydrographic Service
2004 “Hydrographic Quality Assurance Instructions UK Hydrographic Office
for Admiralty Surveys”
__________
M-13
253
CHAPTER 5
WATER LEVELS AND FLOW
1. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this chapter is to provide the hydrographer and technical reader the fundamental
information required to understand and apply water levels, derived water level products and datums, and
water currents to carry out field operations in support of hydrographic surveying and mapping activities.
The hydrographer is concerned not only with the elevation of the sea surface, which is affected
significantly by tides, but also with the elevation of lake and river surfaces, where tidal phenomena may
have little effect. The term ‘tide’ is traditionally accepted and widely used by hydrographers in
connection with the instrumentation used to measure the elevation of the water surface, though the term
‘water level’ would be more technically correct. The term ‘current’ similarly is accepted in many areas in
connection with tidal currents; however water currents are greatly affected by much more than the tide
producing forces. The term ‘flow’ is often used instead of currents.
Tidal forces play such a significant role in completing most hydrographic surveys that tide producing
forces and fundamental tidal variations are only described in general with appropriate technical references
in this chapter. It is important for the hydrographer to understand why tide, water level and water current
characteristics vary both over time and spatially so that they are taken fully into account for survey
planning and operations which will lead to successful production of accurate surveys and charts.
Because procedures and approaches to measuring and applying water levels, tides and currents vary
depending upon the country, this chapter covers general principles using documented examples as
appropriate for illustration.
2. TIDES AND WATER LEVELS
2.1 Principles of Tides and Water Levels
The observed tides at any given port are the result of many factors, including the response of the ocean
basin to the tide producing forces, to the modifications of the tide due to shallow water effects of local
embayments and rivers, to the regional and local effects of weather on water levels.
2.1.1 Astronomical Tide Producing Forces
At the surface of the Earth, the Earth’s gravitational attraction acts in a direction inward toward its centre
of mass and thus holds the ocean waters confined to this surface. However, the gravitational forces of the
Moon and Sun, and centrifugal force of the Sun-Earth-Moon system, act externally upon the Earth's ocean
waters. These external forces are exerted as tide-producing, or tractive forces. Their affects are
superimposed upon the Earth’s gravitational force and act to draw the ocean waters horizontally to
various points on the Earth’s surface.
A high tide is produced in ocean waters by the ‘heaping’ action resulting from the horizontal flow of
water toward the region of maximum attraction of the combined lunar and solar gravitational forces. An
additional high tide is produced at a position on the opposite side of the Earth, where the centrifugal force
of the orbiting system overpowers the gravitational attraction of the Sun and Moon. Low tides are created
by a compensating withdrawal of water from regions around the Earth midway between these two tidal
M-13
254
bulges. The alternation of high and low tides is caused by the daily (or diurnal) rotation of the solid body
of the Earth with respect to these two tidal bulges and the tidal depression. The changing arrival times of
any two successive high or low tides at any one location are the result of numerous factors. Fundamental
tide producing forces have two components due to the Sun (solar) and the Moon (lunar).
2.1.1.1 Origin of Tide-Producing Forces
It appears to an observer on the Earth that the Moon revolves around the Earth, but in reality the Moon
and the Earth each revolve around their common centre of mass known as the barycentre. The two
astronomical bodies tend to be pulled together by gravitational attraction and simultaneously thrown apart
by centrifugal force produced as they revolve around the barycentre. The gravitational attraction and
centrifugal force are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction; thus, the Earth and Moon are neither
pulled toward each other, nor are they further separated from each other. There is a similar effect for the
Earth and Sun system, but they are separate and distinct from those of the Earth and Moon (thus the lunar
and solar components).
These gravitational and centrifugal forces are balanced only at the centres of mass of the individual
bodies. At points on, above or within the bodies, the two forces are not in equilibrium, resulting in tides
of the ocean, atmosphere and lithosphere. On the side of the Earth turned toward the Moon or Sun, a net
(or differential) tide-producing force acts in the direction of the Moon or Sun’s gravitational attraction or
toward the Moon or Sun. On the side of the Earth directly opposite the Moon or Sun, the net
tide-producing force acts in the direction of the greater centrifugal force or away from the Moon or Sun.
2.1.1.2 Centrifugal Force
The barycentre of the Earth/Moon system lies at a point approximately 1,700 km beneath the Earth’s
surface, on the side toward the Moon, and along a line connecting the individual centres of mass of the
Earth and Moon (Figure 5.1). The centre of mass of the Earth describes an orbit (E1, E2, E3...) around the
barycentre (G) just as the centre of mass of the Moon describes its own monthly orbit (M1, M.2, M3...)
around this same point.
As the Earth revolves around the barycentre, the centrifugal force produced at the Earth’s centre of mass
is directed away from the barycentre in the same manner in which an object whirled on a string around
one’s head exerts a tug upon the restraining hand. Because the centre of mass of the Earth is on the
opposite side of the barycentre to the Moon, the centrifugal force produced at the Earth’s centre of mass is
directed away from the Moon. All points in or on the surface of the Earth experience the same magnitude
and direction of this centrifugal force. This fact is indicated by the common direction and length of the
arrows representing the centrifugal force (Fc) at points A, B and C in Figure 5.1 and the thin arrows at
these same points in Figure 5.2. In a similar fashion, the barycentre of the Earth/Sun system lies at a
point well within the Sun because the Sun is so massive relative to the Earth; however the same theory
applies.
It is important to note that the centrifugal force produced by the daily rotation of the Earth on its own axis
is of no consequence in tidal theory. This element plays no part in the creation of the differential
tide-producing forces because the force at any particular location remains constant with time, so the water
surface is always in equilibrium with respect to it.
M-13
255
Fig. 5.1
Fig. 5.2
M-13
256
2.1.1.3 Gravitational Force
While the affect of the external centrifugal force is constant at all points on the Earth, the affect of
gravitational force produced by another astronomical body changes from place to place. This is because
the magnitude of the gravitational force exerted varies with the distance of the attracting body. Thus, in
the theory of tides, another variable influence is introduced, based upon the different distances of various
points on the Earth’s surface from the Moon’s centre of mass. The relative gravitational attraction
exerted by the Moon at various positions on the Earth is indicated in Figure 5.2 by arrows labelled Fg
which are heavier than those representing the centrifugal force components.
Analogous to the fact that the Earth’s own centrifugal force plays no part in producing tides, the effects of
the Earth’s own gravitational force plays no direct part in the origin of tides. Again, this is because the
Earth’s gravitational force at any particular location remains constant with time.
2.1.1.4 Differential Tide-Producing Forces
The centrifugal force acting on the centre of the Earth as the result of its revolving around the barycentre
is equal and opposite to the gravitational force exerted by the Moon on the centre of the Earth. This is
indicated at point C in Figure 5.2 by the thin and heavy arrows of equal length, pointing in opposite
directions. The net result of this circumstance is that the tide-producing force (Ft) at the Earth's centre of
mass is zero.
The sublunar point, point A in Figure 5.2, is approximately 6,400 km nearer to the Moon than point C.
Here, the force produced by the Moon’s gravitational pull is larger than the gravitational force at C due to
the Moon; because the centrifugal force is everywhere equal and opposite to the gravitational pull of the
Moon at the Earth’s centre of mass, the larger gravitational pull at point A overpowers the centrifugal
force, for a net force in the direction of the Moon. This is indicated in Figure 5.2 by the double-shafted
arrow. The resulting tide produced on the side of the Earth toward the Moon is known as the direct tide.
On the opposite side of the Earth, the antipodal point, point B, is about 6,400 km farther from the Moon
than point C, the Moon’s gravitational force is less than at C; because the centrifugal force at point B is
greater than the gravitational attraction of the Moon at point C, the resultant tide-producing force at this
point is again directed away from the Earth’s centre. This force is indicated by the double-shafted arrow
at point B. The tide produced in the antipodal point is known as the opposite tide
There is also a similar set up of differential forces in the Earth/Sun system.
2.1.1.5 Tractive Force
Tide-producing forces have a magnitude of only about one 9-millionth of the Earth's own gravitational
attraction. The tide-producing forces, therefore, are wholly insufficient to noticeably lift water against the
pull of the Earth’s gravity. Instead, the tides are generated by the horizontal component of the
tide-producing forces. At any point on the Earth’s surface, the tide-producing force may be resolved into
two components – one vertical, or perpendicular to the Earth’s surface, and the other horizontal, or
tangential to the Earth’s surface; because the horizontal component is not opposed in any way to gravity,
it can act to draw particles of water freely over the Earth’s surface toward the sublunar and antipodal
points.
The horizontal component, known as the tractive (‘drawing’) component of force, is the actual
mechanism for producing the tides. The tractive force is zero at the sublunar and antipodal points,
because the tide-producing force is entirely vertical at these points; thus, there is no horizontal
M-13
257
component. Any water accumulated in these locations by tractive flow from other points on the Earth’s
surface tends to remain in a stable configuration, or tidal ‘bulge’. Thus, there exists a constant tendency
for water to be drawn from other points on the Earth’s surface toward the sublunar point (A in Figure 5.2)
and its antipodal point (B in Figure 5.2), and to be heaped at these points in two tidal bulges. As a special
case of Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation, the tide-producing force varies inversely as the third
power of the distance of the centre of mass of the attracting body from a given point on the surface of the
Earth.
Within a band around the Earth roughly midway between the sublunar and antipodal points, the tractive
force is also zero, because the tide-producing force is directed vertically. There is, therefore, a tendency
for the formation of a stable depression in this region.
2.1.1.6 The Tidal Force Envelope
If the ocean waters were to respond exclusively to tractive forces and the Earth were covered with water
without continents, the water surface would approximate the shape of a prolate spheroid. The major axis
of the spheroid would lie along a line connecting the centres of mass of the Earth and Moon, the minor
axis would be centred on, and at right angles to, the major axis. The two tidal humps and the tidal
depression are represented in this force envelope by the directions of the major axis and rotated minor
axis of the spheroid, respectively. From a purely theoretical point of view, the daily rotation of the solid
Earth with respect to these two tidal bulges and the depression may be conceived to be the cause of the
lunar tides. With respect to the Sun, the resulting bulges and depressions may be conceived to be the
cause of the solar tides.
As the Earth rotates, one would ideally expect to find a high tide followed by a low tide at the same place
6 hours later, then a second high tide after 12 hours, and so forth. This would nearly be the case if a
smooth, continent-free Earth were covered to a uniform depth with water, if the tidal force envelope of
the Moon alone could be considered, the position of the Moon were fixed and invariable in distance and
relative orientation with respect to the Earth and Sun and if there were no other accelerating or retarding
influences affecting the motions of the waters of the Earth; however this is far from the actual situation.
First, the tidal force envelope produced by the affect of the Moon is accompanied by, and interacts with, a
tidal force envelope produced by the Sun. The tidal force exerted by the Sun is a composite of the Sun’s
gravitational attraction and the centrifugal force created by the revolution of the Earth around the centre
of mass of the Earth-Sun system. The position of this force envelope shifts with the relative orbital
position of the Earth with respect to the Sun; due of the great difference between the average distances of
the Moon and Sun from the Earth (384,400 km and 150,000,000 km, respectively), the tide-producing
force of the Moon is approximately 2.5 times that of the Sun, even though the Sun is so much more
massive than the Moon.
Second, there exists a wide range of astronomical variables in the production of the tides. Some of these
are the changing distances of the Moon from the Earth and the Earth from the Sun, the angle which the
Moon in its orbit makes with the Earth’s equator, the angle which the Sun appears in the yearly orbit of
the Earth about the Sun and the variable phase relationships of the Moon with respect to the Sun and
Earth. Some of the principal types of tides resulting from these purely astronomical influences are
described below.
Third, other affects come into play, causing the water level to differ from the astronomically induced tide.
These include restrictions to the flow of water caused by the continents and meteorological affects, among
others.
M-13
258
2.1.2 Tidal Characteristics
The actual characteristics of the tide at locations around the Earth differ significantly from the idealised
tidal envelope discussed previously. First of all, water is a somewhat viscous fluid, which lags in its
response to the tide-generating forces. More significantly, the Earth is not a smooth sphere with
uniformly deep water covering its entire surface. Tidal movements are affected by friction with the ocean
floor and with other ocean currents; the continents interrupt, restrict and reflect tidal movements; the
shape and size of the ocean basins accentuate or dampen various components of the tide producing forces.
The rise and fall of the tide does not occur at a uniform rate. From low water, the tide begins rising very
slowly at first, but at a constantly increasing rate for about 3 hours when the rate of rise is at a maximum.
The rise continues for about 3 more hours, but at a constantly decreasing rate until high water. The
falling tide follows a similar pattern of increasing then decreasing rate. When the rise and fall of the tide
is represented graphically, it can be seen to approximate the form of a sine curve. At any location,
however, the rise and fall of the tide, and consequently the shape of the curve, will be characterised by a
variety of features. These features will vary considerably from location to location. Of these features,
three may be considered as constituting the principle characteristics of the tide. These three are the time
of tide, the range of tide and the type of tide. The hydrographer must understand and consider each of
these three characteristics in order to compute and apply tidal reductions to soundings.
2.1.2.1 Time of Tide
A stationary moon would appear to cross the meridian at any given place once every day; but, because the
Moon revolves around the Earth in the same direction in which the Earth is rotating, any point on the
Earth must actually rotate approximately 12.5° extra each day to catch up with the Moon. This 12.5°
requires about 50 minutes, resulting in a ‘tidal day’ of 24 hours and 50 minutes.
The time of tide refers to the time of occurrence of high or low water with respect to the Moon’s meridian
passage. This characteristic of the tide at a specific place is described by the high and low water lunitidal
intervals. The lunitidal interval is the elapsed time between a meridian passage of the Moon and the high
or low water. Lunitidal intervals are not constant along any given meridian. The intervals vary, based
upon the interruption of the tidal wave by land masses and by the resistance of the ocean floor as the wave
moves into shallow water.
Even at any given place, the intervals are not constant, but they do vary periodically within relatively
narrow limits. This limited variation in lunitidal interval results from the interaction between the tidal
forces of the Moon and the Sun. Between new Moon and first quarter, and between full Moon and third
quarter, this interaction can cause an acceleration in tidal arrival times. Between first quarter and full
Moon, and between third quarter and new Moon, the interaction can result in a lagging of the tidal arrival.
Lunitidal intervals are defined both in terms of the Moon’s meridian passage over Greenwich and the
Moon’s meridian passage over the local longitude. They are known respectively as the Greenwich
lunitidal interval and the local lunitidal interval. Greenwich intervals are more useful in that they can be
used to relate the times of tide at one place to those at any other place. The time of tide is important in
analysis and prediction of the tides and in the computation of tidal zoning correctors.
2.1.2.2 Tidal Range
The difference in height between consecutive high and low tides occurring at a given place is known as
the range. In the open ocean, the actual height of the tidal wave crest is relatively small (usually 1 m or
M-13
259
less) and uniform. It is only when the tidal crests and troughs move into shallow water, against land
masses, and into confining channels that large tidal ranges and noticeable variations in range are apparent.
The range of tide at a particular location is not constant, but varies from day to day. Part of this variation
is caused by the effects of wind and weather, but mostly it is a periodic phenomenon related to the
positions of the Sun and the Moon relative to the Earth. In this day to day change, the tide responds to
three variations, each associated with a particular movement of the Moon.
Lunar Phase Effects: Spring and Neap Tides – At most places, the Moon’s phase has the greatest affect
on the range of the tide. It has been noted that the tides originate from the combined effects of tractive
forces generated by both the Sun and the Moon; because of the Moon’s changing position with respect to
the Earth and Sun (Figure 5.3) during its monthly cycle of phases, tractive forces generated by the Moon
and Sun act variously along a common line and at changing angles relative to each other.
Fig. 5.3
When the Moon is at new phase and full phase (both positions being called syzygy), the gravitational
attractions of Moon and Sun act to reinforce each other; as the resultant or combined tidal force is also
increased, the high tides are higher than average and low tides are lower. This means the tidal range is
greater at all locations which display a consecutive high and low water. Such greater-than-average tides
resulting at the syzygy positions of the Moon are known as spring tides – a term which merely implies a
‘welling-up’ of the water and bears no relationship to the season of the year.
At first- and third-quarter phases (quadrature) of the Moon, the gravitational attractions of the Moon and
Sun upon the waters of the Earth are exerted at right angles to each other. Each force tends in part to
counteract the other. In the tidal force envelope representing these combined forces, both the maximum
and minimum force values are reduced. High tides are lower than average and low tides are higher. Such
tides of diminished range are called neap tides, from a Greek word meaning ‘scanty’.
M-13
260
Parallax Effects (Moon and Sun) – Since the Moon follows an elliptical path (Figure 5.4), the distance
between the Earth and Moon will vary throughout the month by about 50,000 km. The Moon’s
gravitational attraction for the Earth’s waters will change in inverse proportion to the third power of the
distance between Earth and Moon, in accordance with the previously mentioned variation of Newton’s
Law of Gravitation. Once each month, when the Moon is closest to the Earth (perigee), the
tide-generating forces will be higher than usual, thus producing above-average ranges in the tides.
Approximately 2 weeks later, when the Moon (at apogee) is farthest from the Earth, the lunar tide-pro-
ducing force will be smaller and the tidal ranges will be less than average. Similarly, in the Sun-Earth
system, when the Earth is closest to the Sun (perihelion), about January 2 of each year, the tidal ranges
will be enhanced, and when the Earth is farthest from the Sun (aphelion), around July 2, the tidal ranges
will be reduced.
Fig. 5.4
When perigee, perihelion, and either the new or full Moon occur at approximately the same time,
considerably increased tidal ranges result. When apogee, aphelion, and the first- or third-quarter Moon
coincide at approximately the same time, considerably reduced tidal ranges will normally occur.
Lunar Declination Effects: The Diurnal Inequality – The plane of the Moon’s orbit is inclined only
about 5° to the plane of the Earth’s orbit (the ecliptic) and thus the Moon in its monthly revolution around
the Earth remains very close to the ecliptic.
The ecliptic is inclined 23.5° to the Earth’s equator, north and south of which the Sun appears to move
once each half year to produce the seasons. In a similar fashion, the Moon, in making a revolution around
the Earth once each month, passes from a position of maximum angular distance north of the equator to a
position of maximum angular distance south of the equator during each half month. This is declination.
M-13
261
Twice each month, the Moon crosses the equator. In Figure 5.5, this condition is shown by the dashed
position of the Moon. The corresponding tidal force envelope due to the Moon is depicted, in profile, by
the dashed ellipse. Tides occurring when the Moon is near the equator are known as equatorial tides,
while those occurring when the Moon is near its maximum northern or southern declination are known as
tropic tides.
Fig. 5.5
Variability – The effects of phase, parallax and declination are not exhibited everywhere in equal
measure, though all three do occur on all parts of the Earth. Phase inequalities are most commonly
greatest, but in any particular area any one of the three variations may exert the predominant influence on
the range variation of the tide. The month of the Moon’s phases, the synodic month, is approximately
29.5 days; the month of the Moon’ s distance, the anomalistic month, is approximately 27.5 days; and the
month of the Moon’s declination, the tropic month is approximately 29.3 days. It follows, therefore, that
considerable overall variation in the range of the tide occurs at any place as a result of the progressively
changing relations of the three variations to each other. At Seattle, for example, the mean range of tide is
about 2.3 m, but individual ranges within a single day may vary from less than 1.5 m to more than 4.5 m.
The range of tide is subject to other periodic variations (for example, the solar parallax differences noted
earlier), but the three discussed above are the principal variations. The fact all these major variations
cycle completely in 29.5 days or less is the main reason why the hydrographer must operate key tide
stations for a minimum of 30 days. Although the variation in range from one 30-day period to another
will change somewhat, any 30 consecutive days obtained in combination with long-term stations will
usually suffice for preparation of hydrographic tide reductions. One important long-term deviation in
range of tide is due to a slowly varying change in orientation of the Moon’s orbit called the regression of
the Moon’s nodes. This variation results in a measurable corresponding slow difference in the range of
tide. This deviation gives rise to the need to use nodal factors or nodal corrections when performing
harmonic analyses or tide predictions and is important in the determination of various tidal datums (see
section 2.1.4).
M-13
262
2.1.2.3 Types of Tide
Of the three principal tidal characteristics, type of tide is the most fundamental. If the tides at two places
are of the same type, but differ in time or in range, the tide at one place can be related simply and
accurately to the tide at the other location. This similarity underlies the hydrographer’s ability to extend
sounding datums and compute accurate water-level reducers in areas where a relatively short series of
tidal observations have been obtained. On the other hand, if the type of tide at the two places differs, the
fact the time or range may be the same does not necessarily indicate a simple relationship between the
two places. Differences in time and range of tide are merely differences in degree, but differences in type
of tide are differences in the basic nature of the tide.
The type of tide refers to the characteristic form of the rise and fall of the tide as revealed by the tide
curve. Although the tide curve for any particular place will differ in some respects from that of any other
place, tide curves may be grouped into three large classes or types. These types are semidiurnal, diurnal,
and mixed tides.
Referring to Figure 5.5, as the points A and A′ lie along the major axis of this ellipse, the height of the
high tide represented at A is the same as that which occurs as this point rotates to position A′ some
12 hours later. When the Moon is over the equator – or at certain other force-equalizing declinations –
the two high tides and two low tides on a given day are similar in height at any location. Successive high
tides and low tides are then also nearly equally spaced in time and occur uniformly twice daily. This is
known as the semidiurnal type of tide. A semidiurnal curve of tidal height versus time is shown in the top
diagram of Figure 5.6. The semidiurnal type of tide is one in which the full cycle of high and low water is
completed in half a day. There are two high and two low waters in each lunar day of 24 hours
50 minutes. To be classified as a semidiurnal tide, the two daily tidal cycles must resemble each other
such that, although they are not identical, the two highs do not differ much and the two lows do not differ
much.
However, with the changing angular distance of the Moon above or below the equator (as shown in
Figure 5.5), the tidal force envelope produced by the Moon is canted, and differences between the heights
of two daily tides of the same phase begin to occur. Variations in the heights of the tides resulting from
the changes in the declination angle of the Moon and in the corresponding lines of gravitational force
action give rise to a phenomenon known as the diurnal inequality.
In Figure 5.5, point B is beneath a bulge in the tidal envelope. One-half day later, at point B′, it is again
beneath the bulge, but the height of the tide is not as great as at B. This situation gives rise to a
twice-daily tide displaying unequal heights in successive high or low waters, or in both pairs of tides.
This type of tide, exhibiting a strong diurnal inequality, is known as a mixed tide. (See the middle
diagram in Figure 5.6.) The mixed type of tide is one in which two highs and two lows occur each day,
but in which there are marked differences between the two high waters or between the two low waters of
the day. This type of tide is named a mixed tide because it has the properties of a mixture of semidiurnal
and diurnal tides.
M-13
263
Fig. 5.6
Finally, as depicted in Figure 5.5, the point C is seen to lie beneath a portion of the tidal force envelope.
One-half day later, however, as this point rotates to position C′, it is seen to lie above the force envelope.
At this location, therefore, the tidal forces present produce only one high water and one low water each
day. The resultant diurnal type of tide is shown in the bottom diagram of Figure 5.6. The diurnal type of
tide describes those tides in which one high and one low water occur in a lunar day. In this type of tide,
the period of the rise, and also of the fall, of tide is approximately 12 hours as opposed to the 6 hour
periods of semidiurnal tides.
M-13
264
Examples of each of the three types of tide are shown in Figure 5.6, using three days of tidal records from
Hampton Roads, Virginia; San Francisco, California and Pensacola, Florida. The horizontal line through
each curve represents the mean level of the sea and the magnitude of the rise and fall of the tide above
and below mean sea level is indicated by the scale on the left.
The upper curve, for Hampton Roads, illustrates the semidiurnal type of tide. Two high and two low
waters occurred each day, with the morning and evening tides differing relatively little. The bottom
curve, for Pensacola, illustrates the diurnal type of tide, one high and one low occurring each day. The
curve for San Francisco illustrates one form of the mixed type of tide. Two high and two low waters
occurred each day, but the morning tides differ considerably from the afternoon tides. In this particular
case, the difference is seen in both the high and low waters.
The difference between corresponding morning and afternoon tides, or diurnal inequality, arises primarily
from the fact that the Moon’s orbit is inclined to the plane of the equator. This inclination results in the
existence of both diurnal and semidiurnal tide producing forces. These forces affect the actual rise and
fall of water level to differing degrees in different places, mostly as a result of local and basin response to
the forces and thus result in different magnitudes of diurnal inequality. In fact, the distinction between
mixed tides and semidiurnal tides is based entirely on this difference in magnitude.
Refer to the tide curve for San Francisco in Figure 5.6, which illustrates a mixed tide. While there is
considerable inequality in both the high and low waters, the inequality of the low waters is greater. In
Hampton Roads, the inequality, though not very large is exhibited primarily in the high waters. As Figure
5.7 illustrates, the inequality may be featured primarily in the low waters, primarily in the high waters or
it may appear equally in the highs and the lows. It is also significant that the diurnal inequality is a
feature of the time of tide as well as of the height of tide. Just as the inequality of the height varies from
place to place and day to day, the duration of the rise and fall and the lunitidal interval also vary.
To distinguish the two tides of the day, definite names have been given to each of the tides. Of the two
highs, the higher is called ‘higher high water’ (HHW) and the lower, ‘lower high water’ (LHW).
Similarly, the two lows are called ‘lower low water’ (LLW) and ‘higher low water’ (HLW). (See Figure
5.6.) As a measure of the inequality, the terms ‘diurnal high water inequality’ (DHQ) and ‘diurnal low
water inequality’ (DLQ) are used. The DHQ is defined as half the difference between mean higher high
water and mean lower high water and the DLQ is defined as half the difference between the means of
lower low water and higher low water.
These may be more meaningfully understood as the difference between the mean high water and the mean
higher high water, and the difference between the mean low water and the mean lower low water,
respectively.
Examination of a month’s series of tides, as in the curves shown in Figure 5.7, will show that the diurnal
inequality also varies in magnitude in relation to the Moon’s declination, the inequality being the least
when the Moon is near the equator, as it was in this month from the 3rd to the 5th and the 18th to the
20th, and being the greatest when the Moon is near maximum north or south declination, as it was from
the 11th to the 13th and the 25th to the 27th.
M-13
265
Fig. 5.7
M-13
266
2.1.2.4 Basin and Coastal Effects
Although it is the combined forces of the Sun and Moon which set the tidal wave in motion, it is often the
size and shape of the ocean basin which controls the characteristics of the tide. For example, Pensacola,
Florida is certainly not near the pole – the region to which Figure 5.5 would restrict diurnal tides – but it
nonetheless has an unmistakable diurnal tide. Similarly, San Francisco and Hampton Roads are at about
the same latitude, but have distinctly different tidal characteristics. Much like the water in a bathtub can
be set to surging resonantly from end to end, the tidal oscillations in an ocean basin or a restricted sea can
be accentuated by the basin’s natural period of resonance. The Pacific Ocean basin accentuates the
diurnal component of the tides, resulting in diurnal or strongly mixed tides. The Atlantic, on the other
hand, accentuates the semidiurnal component of the tides. As a more localized example, much of the
northern Gulf of Mexico responds primarily to the diurnal components of the tide.
The predominate type of tide can change over relatively short distances. For example, the east coast of
Florida exhibits semidiurnal tides, most of the west coast of Florida exhibits mixed tides and most of the
panhandle of Florida has diurnal tides.
Certain coastal and seafloor configurations can greatly increase the range of tide. Much like a wind wave
crests and breaks as it approaches a beach, a tidal wave also increases in height as it encounters shallow
water and constricting shoreline. Examination of tidal ranges at coastal stations will almost always show
increasing range as the tide moves up a bay or inlet. Cook Inlet, Alaska, a funnel-shaped and shelving
body of water, is a particularly good example. As the tide moves in from the Gulf of Alaska, its range
increases from about 3 m at the entrance to about 10 m near the head at Anchorage. Above Anchorage,
in Turnagain Arm, the inlet narrows and shoals even more. At the times of highest tides, the rising tide
flows up the arm against the last of the ebb and rises into a vertical wall of water reaching nearly 2 m
high. Such a tidally generated wall of water is known as a tidal bore. Tidal bores occur in several rivers
or estuaries around the world where the range of tide is great and the configuration of the shore and
seabed is ideal.
2.1.3 Non-Tidal Water Level Variations
Changes in the observed water level along the coasts are due not only to tidal forces but are also driven by
variety of other forces over a wide-range of time scales. At the highest frequencies, water levels can be
affected by tsunamis, seiche and storm surge. Local wind and barometric pressure changes can have a
large affect, especially in shallow water. Wind set-up from onshore winds and low barometric pressure
will generally cause water levels to be above those predicted while offshore winds and high barometric
pressure tend to have the opposite effect. Strong seasonal meteorological patterns will have affects on
monthly sea levels. ENSO (El Niño Southerly Oscillation) affects on monthly mean sea levels in the
Pacific Ocean are particularly noticeable. Short-term and seasonal affects are also found in tidal estuaries
with strong river flows and are driven by run-off characteristics of individual watersheds and controlling
dams upstream. The Great Lakes and other large lakes are sensitive to the annual evapo-transpiration
cycles and the net gain or loss of water volume. Seasonal variations in oceanic circulation patterns and
deviations in ocean eddies also may affect coastal levels. Depending on the spatial scale of the
meteorological event, the effects can be seen basin-wide, regionally or only locally. The hydrographer
needs to be generally aware of these dependencies in planning and conducting survey operations and to
distinguish any anomalies in water level measurements due to weather or natural causes versus gauge
malfunction.
M-13
267
2.1.4 Tide and Water Level Datums
The hydrographer must be able to relate all measured depths, regardless of the stage of tide or level of
water at the time of sounding, to a common plane or datum. The datum used to reckon heights or depths
for marine applications is a vertical datum called a ‘water level datum’. For tidally derived datums, most
datums are computed over, or referred to, specific 19 year periods or tidal datum epochs. The 19 year
period is important as discussed in section 2.1.2.2, because of the 19 year modulation of lunar
constituents by the long-term variation in the plane of the Moon’s orbit called the regression of the
Moon’s nodes.
The water level datum to which the soundings on any particular survey are referred is known as the
‘sounding datum’. The datum to which depths on a chart are referred is known as the ‘chart datum’. A
water level datum is called a ‘tidal datum’ when defined in terms of a certain phase of tide. In United
States coastal waters, Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) is used for both sounding and chart datums.
MLLW is computed from tabulation of the observations of the tide, in this case the average of the lower
low waters each tidal day over a 19 year period. The United States presently refers all tidal datums
computed from tide observations to the 1983-2001 National Tidal Datum Epoch (NTDE) and updates to
new NTDEs only after analysis of relative mean sea level change. In contrast, some Chart Datums are
derived from harmonic analyses of observations and constructing time series of tide predictions over 19
year periods. The Canadian Chart Datum is the surface of Lower Low Water, Large Tide or LLWLT
which encompasses the previously used datum of Lowest Normal Tide (LNT). British Charts now use a
Chart Datum of Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) based on the lowest predicted tide expected to occur in
a 19 year period. LAT is determined at a particular location by performing a harmonic analysis of the
observations, then using the resulting harmonic constituents in a prediction equation to predict the
elevation of the lowest predicted tide to occur over a 19 year period. Use of LAT has been adopted for
international use by the International Hydrographic Organisation (IHO). Harmonic analyses have also
been used to determine other Chart Datums. Chart Datums used on some older British Admiralty Charts
were Mean Low Water Springs (MLWS) and Indian Spring Low Water (ISLW). MLWS and ISLW are
derived from summations of the amplitudes of various major harmonic constituents below local Mean Sea
Level.
In areas where there is very little or no tide, other water level datums are used. For the Black Sea, Mean
Sea Level or Mean Water level is used. In the Great Lakes, both Canada and the United States use a
separate fixed Low Water Datum (LWD) for each lake based on analyses of monthly means during low
water stages. In non-tidal lagoons and bays in the coastal United States where the area transitions from
tidal to non-tidal, a LWD is used which is determined by subtracting 0.2 m from the local Mean Sea
Level derived from observations and adjusted to a 19 year period.
There are a variety of local Chart Datums employed in tidal rivers as well. In the United States, Chart
Datums have been derived from analyses of measurements during the low river stages over a period of
time and then are held fixed for charting purposes. Examples are the Hudson River Datum and Columbia
River Datum derived from MLLW based on observations during the lowest river stages during the year.
The water level datum is a local plane of elevation which applies only in the specific area in which water
level measurements have been made. Whether tidal or non-tidal, it is permanently referred to the land by
levelling from the water level gauge to a local network of bench marks. Computational procedures for
determining tidal datums are addressed later in this Chapter.
Water level datums are completely distinct from geodetic vertical datums. For instance, the United States
and Canada use the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) and the International Great
Lakes Datum of 1985 (IGLD 85) as the vertical datums for geodetic purposes. The relationship between
M-13
268
NAVD 88 (or IGLD 85) and local mean sea level or mean water level varies considerably from place to
place. In fact, it is impossible to transfer a tidal datum from one place to another with geodetic levelling,
without considering local tidal conditions. The geodetic network does, however, establish relationships
between the many tide stations and their tidal datum elevations around the North American continent, and
it could be used to recover a connected local tidal datum if the tidal bench marks are destroyed. This
requires level connections or GPS connections between geodetic and tidal bench mark networks.
2.1.5 Harmonic Analysis and Tide Prediction
Each of the tide-generating motions described in the above sections can be represented by a simple cosine
curve as illustrated in Figure 5.8. The horizontal axis represents time and the vertical represents the
magnitude of the tide-generating force. The crests give the times of the maximums in the tide-generating
force and the troughs, the minimums. For example in Figure 5.8, in the Sun-Earth system, noon, with the
Sun overhead, is at the first crest. Six hours later a minimum occurs at the trough. The second maximum
is at midnight with the second crest. Another trough is for dawn and then back to the original noon crest.
Each one of the tide-generating motions, represented by a simple harmonic cosine curve, is known as a
tidal component, tidal constituent, or harmonic constituent. A letter or letters and usually a subscript are
used to designate each constituent. The tidal constituent described above, for example, called the
Principal Solar semidiurnal constituent, is designated S2. The Principal Lunar semidiurnal constituent is
designated M2. S is for sun and M is for moon and the subscript 2 means that there are two complete tidal
cycles for each astronomic cycle. Thus, these are said to be semidiurnal constituents. Constituents are
described by their tidal period (the time from maximum to maximum), P. The period for the S2 is 12.00
solar hours (hr.) and the period for the M2 is 12.42 solar hours:
Speed (frequency), n=360°/P
Speed (frequency), n=360°/P

Period, P (hrs.)
High Tide Low Tide High Tide Low Tide High Tide
Crest
Range
Trough
0° 90° 180° 270° 360° 90° 180° 270° 360

Phase
Time (hrs.)
From S . Hicks (2004)
Fig. 5.8 “The tide curve visualized as a wave-form”
M-13
269
In tidal work, each constituent (cosine curve) is more often described by its speed (or frequency in
degrees per hour). The cosine curve is divided into 360° (from crest to crest). The speed n of the
constituent is 360°/P. Thus, for S2, n = 360°/12.00 = 30°/hr; for M2, n = 360°/12.42 = 28.984°/hr.
There are an infinite number of constituents to describe almost all of the perturbations in the relative
motions of the Sun, Moon, and Earth (including the distance and declinational aspects). However, after
about 37, the effects of these motions in representing the actual tides are extremely small in most
locations in the United States. For tidally complex areas inside estuaries, such as Anchorage, Alaska and
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, it takes over one hundred constituents to adequately describe the tide curve.
These additional constituents are artifacts which combine the fundamental diurnal and semidiurnal
constituents to produce high frequency (from 3 to 13 cycles per day) constituents which attempt to
describe the complex non-linear affects of seabed friction and shallow water.
The representations of the various astronomical events and the development of their periods and speeds
are essential in understanding the harmonic analysis techniques. The development of frictional, shallow
water and compound tidal constituents are outside of the scope of this chapter.
The Principal Solar semidiurnal constituent, S2, represents the Earth spinning relative to the Sun. The
Earth rotates once in 24 mean solar hours or, since around the world is 360°; it is going at the rate of
360°/24 = 15°/hr. However, there is a maximum in the solar tide producing force under the Sun and
again on the opposite side (midnight). So, the period (maximum to maximum) of the constituent is 12
mean solar hours and the speed is: S2 360°/12 = 30°/hr.
The Principal Lunar semidiurnal constituent, M2, represents the Earth spinning relative to the Moon.
Since the Moon is moving eastward, it takes 24.8412 mean solar hours to bring the Moon back overhead.
Again, there are two maximums in this lunar day, so the period is only 12.4206 mean solar hours and its
speed is: M2 360°/12.4206 = 28.984°/hr.
S2 and M2 get into phase (maxima lined up) and out of phase (maximum of one lined up with the
minimum of the other) to produce spring and neap tides, respectively (Figure 5.3). Spring tides occur at
the times of full moon and new moon while neap tides occur at the times of the first and third quarter
moons. The revolution of the Moon around the Earth relative to the Sun takes 29.5306 days (called the
synodic month or one lunation). Since there are two maximums, spring tides occur every 29.5306/2 =
14.765 days and neap tides 7.383 days later than the springs.
The Larger Lunar Elliptic semidiurnal constituent, N2, and the Smaller Lunar Elliptic semidiurnal
constituent, L2, are two constituents designed to simulate the cycle of perigee to perigee. These are
completely artificial constituents in contrast with S2 and M2 which have realistic relationships to the solar
and lunar envelopes of the tide-generating forces. Perigee to perigee occurs every 27.5546 days (the
anomalistic month) or 661.31 mean solar hours. The speed of perigee to perigee is thus 360°/661.31 =
0.544°/hr. This is a lunar event and the speed of M2 is 28.984°/hr. The constituent speeds are, therefore:
N2 28.984 – 0.544 = 28.440°/hr.

L2 28.984 + 0.544 = 29.528°/ hr.
Thus, when N2 and L2 are in phase every 27.5546 days (the anomalistic month) they add to M2 to simulate
the near approach to the Moon (perigee). Also, 13.7773 days later they are out of phase simulating
apogee (the Moon farthest away).
The Luni-solar Declinational diurnal constituent, K1, and the Principal Lunar Declinational diurnal
constituent, O1, are also artificial constituents designed to simulate the cycle of maximum declination to
M-13
270
maximum declination of the moon. Maximum north to maximum north occurs every 27.3216 days (the
tropical month) or 655.72 mean solar hours. However, both north and south declinations produce the
same results. The north to south (and south to north) cycle is 655.72/2 = 327.86 hours. The speed is
360°/327.86 = 1.098°/hr. The speeds of the constituents, as they modify M2, will be the speed of M2 plus
and minus the speed of the north to south cycle. Since the maximum is only felt once per day as the earth
spins, the constituent speeds are half the sum and difference:
K1 (28.984 + 1.098)/2 = 15.041°/hr.

O1 (28.984 – 1.098)/2 = 13.943°/hr.
Thus, when K1 and O1 are in phase, every 13.6608 days (one half of the tropical month, i.e. the month
with respect to the vernal equinox), they add to M2 to simulate the maximum declination of the Moon
north or south. They account for the diurnal inequality due to the Moon (the two high tides and/or the
two low tides being unequal in height each tidal day) and, at extremes, diurnal tides (one high tide and
one low tide each tidal day).
The Luni-solar Declinational diurnal constituent, K1, and the Principal Solar Declinational diurnal
constituent, P1, are designed to simulate the cycle of maximum declination to maximum declination of the
Sun. Maximum north to maximum north occurs every 365.2422 days (the tropical year) or 8765.81 mean
solar hours. However, both north and south declinations produce the same results. The north to south
(and south to north) cycle is 8765.81/2 = 4382.91 hrs. The speed is 360°/4382.91 = 0.082°/hr. The
speeds of the constituents, as they modify S2, will be the speed of S2 plus and minus the speed of the north
to south cycle. Since the maximum is only felt once per day as the earth spins, the constituent speeds are
half of the sum and difference:
K1 (30.000 + 0.082)/2 = 15.041°/hr.

P1 (30.000 – 0.082)/2 = 14.959°/hr.
Thus, when K1 and P1 are in phase every 182.62 days (one half of the tropical year, i.e. the year with
respect to the vernal equinox), they add to S2 to simulate the maximum declination of the Sun north or
south. These constituents also contribute to diurnal inequality.
The theoretical relative magnitudes of the various constituents are also of interest. It must be
remembered, however, that they are computed from the tide-generating forces and are not necessarily the
values in the observed tide. They are based on the value, one, for M2, since M2 is usually the dominant
constituent. The relative magnitude values, together with the periods of the constituents (360°/speed),
are:
M2 1.00 12.42 hrs.
S2 0.46 12.00 hrs.
O1 0.41 25.82 hrs.
K1 0.40 23.93 hrs.
N2 0.20 12.66 hrs.
P1 0.19 24.07 hrs.
L2 0.03 12.19 hrs.
2.1.5.1 Harmonic Analysis
The mathematical process of looking at one constituent at a time from an observed time series is called
harmonic analysis. By knowing the periods of the constituents, it is possible to remove them, providing
there is a series which is long enough. Generally, one year is desirable but one month can provide
M-13
271
adequate results with dominant semidiurnal tides. Standard analyses are made for 37 constituents by the
U.S., although several of them may be quite small at many of the stations.
From a harmonic analysis of the observed water level series, two values are obtained for each tidal
constituent. Amplitude, the vertical distance between mean tide level and the level of the crest (when
plotted as a cosine curve) is one of the values. The other value is the phase lag (Epoch). The phase lag is
the amount of time elapsed from the maximum astronomic event to the first maximum of its
corresponding constituent tide. It is usually expressed in degrees of one complete cosine curve (360°) of
that constituent. These two values are known as harmonic constants and are illustrated in Figure 5.9. It
must be remembered that they are unique to the particular station location from which they were derived.
Also, the harmonic constants are treated as a constant even though in the strictest sense they are not
because the computed values are affected by noise in the signal, the length of the series analysed, etc.
The accepted constants which are used are considered the best estimates of the actual (unknown) values.
When any natural event or engineering project occurs, such as erosion, deposition, dredging or
breakwater construction, which has the potential to cause major alterations in the adjacent topography
new measurements and a new harmonic analysis must be undertaken.
A is amplitude in feet
κ is phase lag (Epoch) in degrees
is the astronomic event
κ
-κ
0° 90° 180° 270° 360°
Time
From S. Hicks (2004)
Fig. 5.9 “The amplitude and phase lag of a harmonic constituent”
2.1.5.2 Prediction of Tides
To predict the tide, say for a calendar year, it is necessary to know the harmonic constants (amplitudes
and phase lags) for the constituents at each location for which predictions are desired. These are obtained
from a harmonic analysis of the observed tide at each station as described above. Adjustments are made
for the astronomic configurations for the beginning of the year. Knowing the phase lag of each
constituent from the harmonic analysis, the first maximum of each cosine curve occurs after the event by
the amount of its phase lag. The amplitude of each cosine curve is that found from the harmonic analysis.
M-13
272
Finally, at each hour of the year, the heights of all the cosine curves are added. When plotted, the
resulting curve is normally very similar (in shape and size) to the original observed curve.
The times and heights of the high tides and low tides are placed as predictions for the forthcoming year;
the vast number of predictions is possible by applying corrections to those stations for which harmonic
constants have been determined - the Primary Control Stations (Reference Stations). Subordinate
Stations (those without harmonic constants) are referred to their nearby Reference Stations by empirical
constants. Thus, predictions are also obtained for these Subordinate Stations.
The type of tide at a given location is largely a function of the declinations of the Sun and Moon. The
declinations are constantly varying such that the type of tide changes throughout the month and year at
many of the locations. A more rigorous classification system is available using the amplitudes of the
major constituents at each location. Quantitatively, where the ratio of (K1 + O1) to (M2 + S2) is less than
0.25, the tide is classified as semidiurnal; where the ratio is from 0.25 to 1.5, the tide is mixed mainly
semidiurnal; where the ratio is from 1.6 to 3.0, the tide is mixed mainly diurnal; and where the ratio is
greater than 3.0, it is diurnal.
The characteristics of diurnal inequality and its fortnightly variation can be explained by considering the
combination of diurnal and semidiurnal constituents resulting from the diurnal and semidiurnal tide
producing forces. As represented in Figure 5.10, where the semidiurnal constituent is represented by a
dotted line and the diurnal constituent by the dashed line, the resultant tide, shown by a solid line, is
clearly the sum of the two constituents.
Semiduirnal plus Diurnal Constituent

m2
1.000
k1
0.800
m2 + k1
e 0.600
l
0.400
e
v 0.200
a 0.000
t -0.200
i
-0.400
o
n -0.600
-0.800
-1.000
12-31-01 01-02-02 01-04-02 01-06-02 01-08-02 01-10-02
time
Fig. 5.10
M-13
273
The relative ranges of the constituents at any location, as well as the relative times of the two constituents,
depend not only on the relative magnitude and phase of the tide producing forces, but also on the
hydrographic characteristics of the tidal basin and the local area. For this reason, the same tide producing
forces can result in different relative times and ranges of the diurnal and semidiurnal constituents at
different places. Figure 5.10 portrays the simple case where the ranges of the two constituents are equal,
but the relative time of the highs and lows varies. In each case, there is considerable diurnal inequality,
but there are profound differences in the phase of the tide which exhibits the inequality. In the upper
diagram, where the low waters occur at the same time, the diurnal inequality is exhibited in the low
waters. In the middle diagram, where the high waters occur simultaneously, the inequality is exhibited in
the high waters. And, in the lower diagram, where the two constituents are at mean sea level at the same
time, the inequality is featured equally in the highs and the lows. These three diagrams depict the three
general classes into which diurnal inequality of tidal heights are grouped.
In actually occurring tides, not only do the times of the constituents have different relations, but the
ranges of the two constituents also differ. Refer to the lower diagram in Figure 5.10. If the range of the
semidiurnal constituent (dotted line) remains as shown, but the range of the diurnal constituent (dashed
line) becomes greater, it can be seen that the lower high water will become lower, and the higher low
water will become higher. When the range of the diurnal constituent becomes twice that of the
semidiurnal constituent, the lower high water and the higher low water will be equal in height, resulting in
a ‘vanishing tide’. As the range of the diurnal constituent increases further, there will be but one high and
one low water in a day, a diurnal tide. Combining the affects of time and range, it turns out that if the
range of the diurnal constituent is less than 2 times that of the semidiurnal constituent, there will be two
high and two low waters daily; if the diurnal range is between 2 and 4 times the semidiurnal there may be
two high and two low waters or there may be only one high and one low water in a day; and if the diurnal
range exceeds 4 times the semidiurnal, only one high and one low water in the day will occur.
It should be noted that the magnitudes of both diurnal and semidiurnal forces vary during the month, the
former being greatest at maximum north and south declination, the latter peaking when the Moon is over
the equator. The tide at a given place, therefore, exhibits varying degrees of inequality within any two
week period.
In reality, there are over 70 tidal constituents which combine to produce the resultant tide. Of these, there
are four major semidiurnal constituents and three major diurnal constituents which are combined into the
semidiurnal and diurnal constituents pictured in Figure 5.11.
Each constituent is based on some motion of the Earth, Moon or Sun, or combination thereof. The most
important of these constituents complete their cycle within a month and all but the most insignificant
complete their cycle within about 18.6 years. The 19 year period of operation required for designation as
a primary tide station is based on this timetable. The whole-year period of 19 years is used rather than the
18.6 year cycle, because seasonal variations are often much greater than some of the minor astronomic
constituents.
M-13
274
Fig. 5.11
2.2 Operational Support Functions
This section covers the water level and vertical datum requirements for operational support of
hydrographic surveys. The scope of this support is comprised of the following functional areas:
a. tide and water level requirement planning;

b. preliminary tide and water level zoning development;
c. control water level station operation;
d. supplemental water level station installation, operation and removal;
e. data quality control, processing, and tabulation;
f. tide and water level datum computation and datum recovery;
g. generation of water level reducers and final tidal zoning.
M-13
275
2.2.1 Error Budget Considerations
The water level reducers can be a significant corrector to soundings to reduce them relative to chart datum
particularly in shallow water areas with relatively high ranges of tide. The errors associated with water
level reducers are generally not depth dependent, however. The portion of the error of the water level
reducers must be balanced against all other sounding errors to ensure that the total sounding error budget
is not exceeded. The allowable contribution of the error for tides and water levels to the total survey error
budget typically falls between 0.20 m and 0.45 m depending on the complexity of the tides.
The total error of the tides and water levels can be considered to have component errors of:
a. the measurement error of the gauge/sensor and processing error to refer the measurements
to station datum. The measurement error, including the dynamic effects, should not exceed
0.10 m at the 95% confidence level (see IHO Standards for Hydrographic Surveys, S-44,
April 1998, section 4.2). The processing error also includes interpolation error of the water
level at the exact time of the soundings. A estimate for a typical processing error is 0.10 m
at the 95% confidence level.
b. the error in computation of first reduction tidal datums and for the adjustment to 19 year
periods for short term stations. The shorter the time series, the less accurate the datum, i.e.
bigger the error. An inappropriate control station also decreases accuracy. NOAA has
determined that the estimated error of an adjusted tidal datum based on one month of data
is 0.08 m for the Atlantic and Pacific coasts and 0.11 m for the coast in the Gulf of Mexico
(at the 95% confidence level).
c. the error in application of tidal zoning. Tidal zoning is the extrapolation and/or
interpolation of tidal characteristics from a known shore point(s) to a desired survey area
using time differences and range ratios. The greater the extrapolation/interpolation, the
greater the uncertainty and error. Estimates for typical errors associated with tidal zoning
are 0.20 m at the 95% confidence level. However, errors for this component can easily
exceed 0.20 m if tidal characteristics are very complex, or not well-defined, and if there are
pronounced differential effects of meteorology on the water levels across the survey area.
2.2.2 Tide and Water Level Requirement Planning
The planning of tide and water level support for hydrographic surveys requires attention to each of the
seven functional areas listed above. In the context of the complete survey operation and generation of
output product, the planning involves:
a. determination of overall error budget;

b. study of the tide and water level characteristics and the meteorological and oceanographic
environment;
c. determination of which control stations to use and what existing vertical control is in the
area, placement, logistics and time period of short-term water level stations and equipment,
including GPS and geodetic datum connections;
d. construction of zoning schemes;
e. development of operational data collection, quality control and data processing and
analyses functions;
f. development of final zoning and datum determination procedures, application of water
level reducers to the hydrographic sheets and estimation of final error budget.
M-13
276
Project planning attempts to minimise and balance these potential sources of errors through the use and
specification of accurate reliable water level gauges, optimisation of the mix of zoning required, the
number of station locations required and the length of observations required within practical limits of the
survey area and survey duration. The practical limits depend upon the tidal characteristics of the area and
suitability of the coastline for the installation and operation of appropriate water level gauges.
The hydrographer should plan operations to ensure the collection of continuous and valid data series.
Any break in the water level measurement series affects the accuracy of datum computations. Breaks in
data also result in increased error in the tide reducers when interpolation is required to provide data at the
time of soundings. At a critical measurement site where the water level measurement data cannot be
transmitted or monitored during hydrographic operations, an independent backup sensor or a complete
redundant water level collection system should be installed and operated during the project.
The locations of tide stations are selected to meet two sets of criteria. First, for adequate coverage, the
stations must be sufficient in number and appropriately distributed to accurately portray the tidal or water
level regime for the survey area. Second, the specific sites must be suitable for accurate measurement of
the full range of water levels experienced.
The density and distribution of tide gauges depends on the changes in water level (usually tidal)
characteristics of the survey area. The measurement of tide is generally planned to identify every 0.1 m
change in range for areas with 3 m or less range, every 0.2 m change in range for areas with more than
3 m of range and to identify every 0.3 hour change in Greenwich interval.
In determining coverage requirements, tidal characteristics are first evaluated in a general geographic
sense. The type of tide and changes in the type (semidiurnal, diurnal, or mixed) are analysed. The source
from which the tide advances into the area is determined and the strength of the tide is evaluated relative
to seasonal and localised meteorological influences. The areas of transition from tidal to non-tidal
regimes are particularly important, since non-tidal areas receive different treatment for low water datum
determination.
Next, the tidal characteristics are evaluated in a localised geographical context. Complex changes occur
to the tide across shallow inlets, extensive marshes and narrow constrictions. Lagoons may cut off tidal
flow at low water and constant river flow affects the tide at all stages. In large bays of comparatively
shallow depth having a small range of tide, the wind has considerable affect on the time and height of
tide. This is also true in broad stretches of rivers or along shores where the water is shoal. Man-made
influences such as bulkheads, dredging, dams, levees, hydroelectric intakes and water level management
practices can have significant impacts.
After this analysis, approximate station locations are identified. Stations are usually required on both
sides of any significant impediments to tidal flow; at frequent intervals in very shoal areas and in the
narrow upper reaches of tidal rivers; at the head of navigation or limit of survey of all rivers and streams;
and on both sides of transitions from tidal to non-tidal or between diurnal, mixed, and semidiurnal tides.
The survey area is usually bracketed with stations so that extrapolation of water level reducers is not
required. When surveying exposed channel approaches where depths are not much greater than the draft
of vessels, the water level data provided by an inshore gauge alone may not be accurate enough for the
reduction of soundings. In such surveys, a temporary station on an offshore structure may be very
desirable. Also, overlapping coverage is normally planned, so that at least two stations are operating for
any given portion of the survey area. This overlap aids interpolation for zoning purposes and provides
some backup data should one gauge malfunction.
M-13
277
In many cases, historical information is available to assist in planning water level coverage. Primary and
secondary station information, as well as tide and water level data from previous hydrographic surveys,
provide good indications as to how many and approximately where tide stations may be required for a
new survey. Where historical information is not available, the planner must estimate the requirements by
analysing data for nearby areas with similar physiographic characteristics. In these situations, it is
prudent to err on the side of too many stations rather than being unable to provide satisfactory control for
the entire survey area. Soundings acquired with insufficient tide control cannot be corrected with data
from gauges installed after the survey.
2.2.3 Preliminary Tide and Water Level Zoning
Tide and water level zoning is a tool used to extrapolate or interpolate the tide or water level variations
from the closest water level station to the survey area. In many instances, interpolation or extrapolation is
not necessary and water level reducers are provided directly from the water level gauge referenced to
Chart Datum. In most cases, existing stations are not near the survey area or not enough water level
stations can be installed in a practical sense to provide direct control everywhere. The estimated errors in
the extrapolation and interpolation of water levels must be balanced with the total error budget. The more
stations which can be established throughout a survey area, the less the zoning error. The more stations
required, the higher the cost and logistical complexity of operations.
Any zoning scheme requires an oceanographic study of the water level variations in the survey area. For
tidal areas, co-tidal maps of the time and range of tide are constructed based on historical data,
hydrodynamic models and other information sources. Based on how fast the time and range of tide
progress through a given survey area, the co-tidal lines are used to delineate discrete geospatial zones of
equal time and range of tide. Once this is constructed, time and range correctors to appropriate
operational stations or tide prediction stations can be calculated.
The techniques described above will provide correctors in the immediate vicinity of a tide station. In
many instances, the survey area will fall between two or more tide stations, each of which has a different
range of tide. In such situations, the correctors for the intermediate area must be interpolated into
correction zones from the surrounding stations. In most cases, the zoning provided with predicted tides
will be adequate for this purpose. However, should predicted zoning be unavailable or proved incorrect,
the hydrographer can prepare co-tidal and co-range charts in the field from preliminary observed water
levels.
A co-tidal chart portrays lines of equal Greenwich lunitidal intervals. For zoning in the field, co-tidal
charts are usually drawn to show lines of equal time of high or low water before or after the relevant time
at a reference tide station.
Co-range charts portray lines of equal tidal range. For field use, the lines are usually labelled with ratios
relative to the reference station. These relationships to the reference gauge facilitate the preparation of
reducers in the manner. Figures 5.12 and 5.13 are examples of co-tidal and co-range charts of a
hypothetical bay in which a survey is conducted.
M-13
278
254
Fig. 5.12 and 5.13
Co-tidal chart – Co-tidal charts are generally constructed using GIS drawing tools. The following is a
simple manual example to illustrate some of the fundamentals. To construct a co-tidal chart, the
hydrographer should plot the reference station and all secondary, tertiary and short-term tide stations in
the survey area. For best results, the survey area should be within a nearly equilateral triangle or a
quadrilateral formed by tide stations. For each station, the time of arrival of high or low water before or
after the time of arrival at the reference station is annotated. In some cases, the time differences are the
same for high and low water.
For simplicity, such a case is depicted in Figure 5.12. In many cases, however, separate co-tidal charts
for high and low waters are required. Adjacent and opposite stations are connected by straight lines.
Periodic intervals along each line are then interpolated and marked. The time segments used depend upon
the range of tide and the precision desired for reducers. For most areas, 10 min is a suitable interval to
select. The corresponding interval marks along each line are connected by a smooth curve as shown in
Figure 5.12. When two interpolated points conflict, precedence is given to the mark along the shorter line
and to the marks on lines which the curves intersect closest to perpendicularity. In many instances, the
M-13
279
survey areas are so complex that drawing of interpolation lines connecting stations is not practical and the
co-tidal lines are placed by the oceanographer using GIS tools.
Co-range Charts – As shown in Figure 5.13, the chart is laid out as for the co-tidal chart. Instead of
times, tidal ranges or range ratios to the reference station are annotated. Each connecting line is
interpolated by increments, usually 0.1 m of range or the equivalent ratio increment. Smooth co-range
lines are then drawn through the corresponding points on each line, giving precedence in the same manner
as on co-tidal lines.
Zoning Charts – The zoning chart is constructed by overlaying the co-tidal chart on the co-range chart.
The hydrographer can then select regions in which to apply range and time correctors to the reference
station height and time. Examination of Figures 5.12 and 5.13 will reveal that the co-tidal lines and the
co-range lines are not parallel. This difference in orientation is typical of most areas and often results in
irregular shaped corrector zones which may not be operationally efficient. For the purposes of
simplifying preliminary field correctors, however, the hydrographer can adjust the size and shape of zones
to accommodate the operational situation. For example, if a sounding system of east-west lines were
planned, it might be most efficient to alter the zones into east-west bands across the bay. It becomes a
matter of judgment in balancing operational considerations against the need for accuracy and precision.
Regardless of the zoning selected by the hydrographer in the field, however, final zoning will be based
on a complete analysis of the observed water levels and will be designed for maximum accuracy.
Offshore Zoning – When it is impossible, as it is for offshore soundings, to bracket a survey area with tide
stations, water-level zones must be selected on more theoretical considerations. Where the continental
shelf is broad and the tidal wave approaches parallel to the shore, as it does on much of the east coast of
the United States, the tide will arrive offshore earlier than inshore. On other coasts, such as the west coast
of the United States, the tide wave is nearly perpendicular to shore with minimal time and range
differences offshore. For offshore sounding reducers, estimates of time and range corrections to be
applied to coastal tide stations may be made from existing co-tidal charts or from existing ocean tide
models.
2.2.4 Control Water Level Station Operation
Control water level stations are those which already have accepted datums computed for them and which
are typically in operation during the survey. They may be operated by the agency or country performing
the survey or maintained by another entity. These control stations are typically used as references for
tidal prediction, as direct sources of water level reducers during survey operations, as a control data
source to which zoning correctors are applied and control for simultaneous comparison with short-term
stations for datum recovery or datum determination. These long-term control stations are usually part of
each nation’s national network of tide and water level stations.
2.2.5 Supplemental Water Level Station Requirements
These stations are used to provide time series data during survey operations, tidal datum references and
tidal zoning which all factor into the production of final water level reducers for specific survey areas.
Station locations and requirements may be modified after station reconnaissance or as survey operations
progress.
The duration of continuous data acquisition should be a 30 day minimum except for zoning gauges. Data
acquisition is from at least 4 hours before the beginning of the hydrographic survey operations to 4 hours
after the ending of hydrographic survey operations and/or shoreline verification in the applicable areas.
Stations identified as ’30 day’ stations are the ‘main’ subordinate stations for datum establishment,
M-13
280
providing tide reducers for a given project and for harmonic analysis from which harmonic constants for
tide prediction can be derived. At these stations, data must be collected throughout the entire survey
period in specified areas for which they are required and not less than 30 continuous days are required for
accurate tidal datum determination. Additionally, supplemental and/or back-up gauges may also be
necessary based upon the complexity of the hydrodynamics and/or the severity of environmental
conditions of the project area.
A complete supplemental water level measurement station installation shall consist of the following:
a. the installation of the water level measurement system [water level sensor(s), ancillary
measurements sensors (if required), a Data Collection Platform (DCP) or data logger and
satellite transmitter (if installed)] and supporting structure for the DCP and sensor, and a
tide staff (if required).
b. the recovery and/or installation of a minimum number of bench marks and a level
connection between the bench marks and the water level sensor(s) and tide staff as
appropriate on installation and removal of the gauges. Static GPS measurements should
also be made to a subset of the bench marks.
2.2.5.1 Water Level Measurement Systems
2.2.5.1.1 Water Level Sensor and Data Collection Platform
Various types of water level sensors and station configurations are possible. There are several types of
water level sensors which are used by various countries for support of hydrographic surveys. The U.S.
uses air acoustic and pressure (vented) digital bubbler systems for control and supplemental station in
tidal areas and float driven shaft angle encoders for the Great Lakes control stations, see Figure 5.14.
Many other types of float driven and internal non-vented pressure systems are deployed around the globe.
Fig. 5.14
M-13
281
The sensor measurement range should be greater than the expected range of water level. Gauge/sensor
systems should be calibrated prior to deployment and the calibration should be checked after removal
from operations. The calibration standard’s accuracy must be traceable to some national or international
standard. The required water level sensor resolution is a function of the tidal range of the area in which
hydrographic surveys are planned. For tidal range less than or equal to 5 m, the required water level
sensor resolution should be 1 mm or better; for tidal range between 5 m and 10 m, the required water
level sensor resolution should be 3 mm or better; and for tidal range greater than 10 m, the required water
level sensor resolution should be 5 mm or better.
The data acquisition systems should acquire and store water level measurements at time steps required for
tabulation of the significant variations in the water levels. For tides, the U.S. uses a 6 minutes interval to
ensure tabulation of high and low tides to the nearest tenth of an hour. Other longer sampling intervals
may be appropriate for lakes and non-tidal areas, although the sampling interval should be short enough
to measure any seiche action. Many sensors employ burst sampling at high rates to provide a data point at
the sampling or reporting interval. NOAA systems use a 3 minute average of higher rate samples from
the sensors to derive the 6 minute interval data points. Sample statistical outliers and standard deviations
are then used as quality control parameters. Water level data loggers should have a clock accuracy of
within one minute per month. Known error sources for each sensor shall be handled appropriately
through ancillary measurements and/or correction algorithms. Examples of such errors are water density
variations for pressure gauges, barometric pressure correction for non-vented systems, sound path air
temperature differences for acoustic systems and high frequency wave action and high velocity currents
for all sensor types.
For tidal datum applications, it is important for gauges and sensors to be carefully maintained with either
frequent calibration checks or cycled swaps of calibrated sensors for long-term installations. The sensor
‘zero’ must be precisely related to either a tide staff and/or the bench marks through staff/gauge
comparisons or direct levelling between the sensor and the bench marks. Vertical stability of the sensor
‘zero’, both physically and internally, must be monitored and any movement taken into account in the
data reduction and datum computation.
The hydrographer should install a tide staff at a station if the reference measurement point of a sensor
(zero of a gauge) cannot be directly levelled to the local bench marks, i.e. orifice is laid over sea floor in
case of pressure based bubbler gauges. Even if a pressure gauge can be levelled directly, staff readings
are still required for assessment of variations in gauge performance due to density variations in the water
column over time. The tide staff should be mounted independent of the water level sensor so that stability
of the staff or sensor is maintained. Staff should not be mounted to the same pile on which the water level
sensor is located. The staff should be plumbed. When two or more staff scales are joined to form a long
staff, the hydrographer should take extra care to ensure the accuracy of the staff throughout its length.
The distance between staff zero and the rod stop should be measured before the staff is installed and after
it is removed and the rod stop above staff zero height should be reported on the documentation forms.
2.2.5.1.2 Tide Staffs
In areas of large tidal range and long sloping beaches (i.e. Cook Inlet and the Gulf of Maine), the
installation and maintenance of tide staffs can be extremely difficult and costly. In these cases, the
physical installation of a tide staff(s) may be substituted by systematic levelling to the water’s edge from
the closest bench mark. The bench mark becomes the “staff stop” and the elevation difference to the
water’s edge becomes the “staff reading”.
When using pressure sensors, for instance, a series of gauge/staff comparisons through a significant
portion of a tidal cycle should be required at the start, at frequent intervals during deployment and at the
M-13
282
end of a deployment. The staff to gauge observations at the start and end of deployment should be at least
each three hours long and the periodic observations during the deployment should be 1 hour long.
In general, the gauge and staff should be read simultaneously and recorded once a day (minimum of three
days in each seven day period) for the duration of the water level measurements. The average staff-to-
gauge difference should be applied to water level measurements to relate the data to staff zero. Frequent
gauge/staff comparisons (at least three times per week or minimum eight times per month) during
deployment should be required to assist in assuring measurement stability and minimising processing type
errors. A higher number of independent staff readings decrease the uncertainty in transferring the
measurements to station datum and the bench marks. If logistically, it is not practical to have a local tide
observer or for the field party to visit the station because the survey area is a long distance from the
station, then whenever visits are made, a ‘burst’ sample of several staff readings should be made over a
few hours time period instead of one discrete reading.
If the old staff is found destroyed by elements during the deployment, then a new staff should be installed
for the remainder period of the deployment and a new staff to gauge constant needs to be derived by new
sets of staff to gauge observations.
2.2.5.1.3 Bench Marks and Levelling
A network of bench marks is an integral part of every water level measurement station. A bench mark is
a fixed physical object or marker (monumentation) set for stability and used as a reference to the vertical
and/or horizontal datums. Bench marks in the vicinity of a water level measurement station are used as
the reference for the local tidal datums derived from the water level data. The relationship between the
bench marks and the water level sensor or tide staff are established by differential levelling. Since gauge
measurements are referenced to the bench marks, it follows that the overall quality of the datums is partly
dependent on both the quality of the bench mark installation and the quality of the levelling between the
bench marks and the gauge.
2.2.5.1.4 Number and Type of Bench Marks
The number and type of bench marks required depends on the duration of the water level measurements.
Each station typically has one bench mark designated as the primary bench mark (PBM), which should be
levelled to on every run. The PBM is typically the most stable mark in close proximity to the water level
measurement station. The most desirable bench mark for GPS observations will have from 10° above the
horizon 360° of horizontal clearance around the mark. If the PBM is determined to be unstable, another
mark should be designated as PBM. The date of change and the elevation difference between the old and
new PBM should be documented. For stations installed for longer than one-month, from 3 to 5 bench
marks should be established or recovered and levelled to for each station.
2.2.5.1.5 Levelling
At least third-order levels should be run at short-term subordinate stations operated for less than one-year.
Levels should be run between the water level sensor(s) or tide staff and the required number of bench
marks when the water level measurement station is installed, modified (i.e. water level sensor serviced or
replaced), for bracketing purposes or prior to removal. In any case, levels are required at a maximum
interval of six months during the station's operation and are recommended after severe storms, hurricanes,
earthquakes to document stability (see stability discussed below).
M-13
283
Bracketing levels to appropriate number of marks (five for 30-day minimum stations) are required if
smooth tides are required 30 days or more prior to the planned removal of a applicable gauge(s) or after 6
months for stations collecting data for long term hydrographic projects.
2.2.5.1.6 Stability
If there is an unresolved movement of the water level sensor or tide staff zero relative to the PBM, from
one levelling to the next, of greater than 0.010 m, the hydrographer should verify the apparent movement
by re-running the levels between the sensor zero or tide staff to the PBM. This threshold of 0.010 m
should not be confused with the closure tolerances used for the order and class of levelling.
2.2.5.1.7 GPS Observations at Bench Marks
Static GPS surveys should be conducted on a minimum of one bench mark, preferably two marks if time
and resources permit, at each subordinate water level station installed/occupied for hydrography. Static
GPS surveys should be conducted at water level stations concurrently with the occupation of NAVD 88
marks, if possible, to accomplish water level datum transfers using GPS-derived orthometric heights.
High accuracy static differential GPS surveys require a geodetic quality, dual frequency, full-wavelength
GPS receiver with a minimum of 10 channels for tracking GPS satellites. A choke ring antenna is
preferred, however, any geodetic quality ground plane antenna may be used. More important than
antenna type, i.e. choke ring or ground plane, is that the same antennas or identical antennas should be
used during the entire observing sessions. If not, a correction for the difference in antenna phase patterns
(modelled phase patterns) must be applied. This is extremely critical for obtaining precise vertical results.
The antenna cable length between the antenna and receiver should be kept to a minimum when possible;
10 meters is the typical antenna cable length. If a longer antenna cable is required, the cable must be
fabricated from low loss coaxial cable ( RG233 for up to 30 meters and RG214 over 30 meters).
The most desirable bench mark for GPS observations will have from 10° above the horizon 360° of
horizontal clearance around the mark. Newly established marks should be set in locations which have the
required clearances, if at all possible.
Meteorological data (air temperature, barometric pressure and relative humidity) need to be collected, if
available, during the GPS observations. Meteorological data should be collected at or near the antenna
phase centre. All equipment should be checked for proper calibration periodically.
2.2.5.2 Station Documentation
The documentation package:
a. installation of a station;
b. performance of bracketing levels;
c. gauge maintenance and repair;
d. removal of the station.
The station documentation generally includes, but is not limited to the following:
a. calibration test documentation from an independent source other than the manufacturer for
each sensor used to collect water level or ancillary data;
b. a station report documenting the station configuration information and related metadata;
M-13
284
c. new or updated nautical chart section or equivalent map indicating the exact location of the
station, with chart number or map name and scale shown;
d. large-scale sketch of the station site and digital GIS compatible file provided on diskette
showing the relative location of the water level gauge, staff (if any), bench marks and major
reference objects found in the bench mark descriptions. The sketch should include an
arrow indicating north direction, a title block, latitude and longitude (derived from
handheld GPS) of the gauge and all bench marks;
e. new or updated description of how to reach the station from a major geographical
landmark;
f. photographs of station components and bench marks. Digital photographs are preferred.
As a minimum, photographs should show a view of the water level measurement system as
installed, including sensors and gauge housing; a front view of the staff (if any); multiple
views of the surroundings and other views necessary to document the location; photographs
of each bench mark, including a location view and a close-up showing the bench mark
stamping. All photographs should be annotated and referenced with the station name,
number, location and date of the photograph;
g. description/recovery notes of bench mark;
h. level records and level abstract, including level equipment information;
i. datum offset computation worksheet or Staff/Gauge difference work sheet as appropriate

showing how sensor ‘zero’ is referenced to the bench marks.
2.2.6 Data Processing and Tabulation
2.2.6.1 Data Quality Control
The required output product used in generation of tide reducers and for tidal datum determination is a
continuous time series of discrete interval water level data for the desired time period of hydrography and
for a specified minimum time period from which to derive tidal datums. (Note: this discrete time
interval is typically 6 to 10 minutes but for discussion purposes, 6 minutes will be used.) The 6 minute
interval water level data from the water level gauges should be quality controlled for invalid and suspect
data as a final review prior to product generation and application. This includes checking for data gaps,
data discontinuities, datum shifts, anomalous data points, data points outside of expected tolerances such
as expected maximum and minimum values and for anomalous trends in the elevations due to sensor drift
or vertical movement of the tide station components and bench marks.
Quality control should include comparisons with simultaneous data from backup gauges, predicted tides
or data from nearby stations, as appropriate. Data editing and gap filling should use documented
mathematically sound algorithms and procedures and an audit trail should be used to track all changes and
edits to observed data. All inferred data should be appropriately flagged. Water level measurements from
each station should be related to a single, common datum, referred to as Station Datum. Station Datum is
an arbitrary datum and should not be confused with a tidal datum such as MLLW. All discontinuities,
jumps or other changes in the gauge record (refer to the specific gauge user’s guide) which may be due to
vertical movement of any one of the gauge, staff, or bench marks should be fully documented. To avoid
confusion all data should be recorded on UTC (Co-ordinated Universal Time – also known as Greenwich
M-13
285
Mean Time - GMT) and the units of measurement should be properly denoted on all hard-copy output
and digital files.
2.2.6.2 Data Processing and Tabulation of the Tide
The continuous 6 minute interval water level data are used to generate the standard tabulation output
products. These products include the times and heights of the high and low waters, hourly heights,
maximum and minimum monthly water levels and monthly mean values for the desired parameters.
Examples of these tabulation products are found in Figure 5.15 for tide stations. The times and heights of
the high and low waters should be derived from appropriate curve-fitting of the 6 minute interval data.
For purposes of tabulation of the high and low tides and not non-tidal high frequency noise, successive
high and low tides should not be tabulated unless they are appropriately derived. Hourly heights should
be derived from every 6 minute value observed on the hour. Monthly mean sea level and monthly mean
water level should be computed from the average of the hourly heights over each calendar month of data.
Data should be tabulated relative to a documented consistent station datum such as tide staff zero,
arbitrary station datum, MLLW, etc. over the duration of the data observations. Descriptions of general
procedures used in tabulation are also found in the Tide and Current Glossary, Manual of Tide
Observations and Tidal Datum Planes.
2.2.6.3 Data Editing and Gap Filling Specifications
When backup sensor data are not available, data gaps in 6 minute data should not be filled if the gaps are
greater than three consecutive days in length. Data gap filling should use documented mathematically
and scientifically sound algorithms and procedures and an audit trail should be used to track all gap-fills
in observed data. Data gaps of less than 3 hours can be inferred using interpolation and curve-fitting
techniques. Data gaps of longer than 3 hours should use external data sources such as data from a nearby
station. All data derived through gap-filling procedures should be marked as inferred. Individual hourly
heights, high and low waters, and daily means derived from inferred data should also be designated as
inferred.
2.2.6.4 Computation of Monthly Means
When tabulation of the tides covers monthly time periods, monthly means of the various tidal parameters
are computed for subsequent use in tidal datum determination and for quality control of long term data
sets. Monthly mean sea level, for instance, is an important parameter for understanding long term sea
level trends and seasonal variations in water levels. For purposes of monthly mean computation, monthly
means should not be computed if gaps in data are greater than three consecutive days.
M-13
286
Fig. 5.15 “Example of a Monthly Tabulation of the Tide”
Jan 28 2003 08:24 HIGH/LOW WATER LEVEL DATA October, 2002

National Ocean Service (NOAA)
Station: 8454049 T.M.: 0 W
Name: QUONSET POINT, RI Units: Meters
Type: Mixed Datum: Station Datum
Note: > Higher-High/Lower-Low [] Inferred Tide Quality: Verified
High Low High Low

Day Time Height Time Height Day Time Height Time Height
1 7.5 8.037 2.4 7.326 16 <9.7 [8.292] 2.6 7.394
<20.2 8.071 <12.9 7.197 <21.3 8.782 14.6 7.563
2 8.8 8.000 2.6 7.173 17 10.6 8.345 <6.0 7.470
<21.4 8.176 <14.3 7.066 <22.8 8.323 <15.4 7.245
3 9.5 8.233 3.2 7.157 18 10.7 8.257 4.0 7.248
<22.3 8.314 <15.6 7.049 23.3 8.230 16.7 7.196
4 10.5 8.525 4.1 7.163 19 <11.8 8.296 <4.3 7.140
<23.1 8.599 <16.3 7.057 <23.4 8.292 17.1 7.204
5 <11.5 8.632 4.4 7.109 20 <5.0 7.066
23.8 8.466 <17.1 6.873 12.4 8.209 <17.5 6.994
6 <5.8 6.670 21 0.4 [8.128] 5.8 7.036
12.2 8.477 18.2 6.832 <12.8 8.297 18.1 7.090
7 <0.5 8.582 <6.4 6.961 22 0.9 8.142 <6.5 6.999
<13.3 8.819 19.2 6.969 <13.4 8.216 19.0 7.040
8 1.3 8.457 6.9 6.888 23 1.4 [8.075] <6.9 7.013
<14.0 8.644 <20.1 6.877 <13.7 [8.180] <19.1 6.915
9 2.3 8.355 <7.9 6.852 24 2.1 7.934 7.3 6.969
<14.9 8.631 20.9 6.986 <14.7 8.164 19.9 7.093
10 3.4 8.316 <8.2 6.969 25 2.9 [7.993] <8.0 7.047
<15.8 8.497 21.2 7.086 <15.4 8.156 <20.3 7.136
11 4.3 8.240 <9.4 7.129 26 3.8 [8.061] 8.3 7.204
<16.7 8.455 22.1 7.305 <16.2 8.607 23.5 7.389
12 5.2 8.295 <10.3 7.380 27 4.6 7.974 <9.1 7.090
<17.7 8.462 <17.1 8.216 21.9 7.348
13 5.9 8.266 0.5 7.481 28 5.4 7.860 <10.5 7.064
<18.7 8.344 11.8 7.461 <17.9 8.008
14 6.8 8.077 <2.2 7.401 29 6.2 7.949 1.5 7.243
<20.1 8.161 <12.7 7.190 <18.6 8.042 <11.6 7.109
15 8.3 8.156 2.0 7.349 30 7.3 [8.052] <1.5 7.197
20.9 8.273 <14.1 7.344 <20.0 [8.154] 13.0 7.211
31 8.3 8.215 2.1 7.239
<20.7 8.290 <14.1 7.222
Highest Tide: 8.819 13.3 Hrs Oct 7 2002

Lowest Tide: 6.670 5.8 Hrs Oct 6 2002
Monthly Means: MHHW 8.357

MHW 8.272 DHQ 0.085
MTL 7.707 GT 1.266 HWI 0.42 Hrs
DTL 7.724 MN 1.131 LWI 6.13 Hrs
MSL 7.668
MLW 7.141 DLQ 0.050
MLLW 7.091
M-13
287
2.2.7 Computation of Tidal Datums
A vertical datum is called a tidal datum when it is defined by a certain phase of the tide. Tidal datums are
local datums and should not be extended into areas which have differing hydrographic characteristics
without substantiating measurements. In order that they may be recovered when needed, such datums are
referenced to fixed points known as bench marks.
Basic Procedures:
a. Make Observations – Tidal datums are computed from continuous observations of the
water level over specified lengths of time. Observations are made at specific locations
called tide stations. Each tide station consists of a water level gauge or sensor(s), a data
collection platform or data logger and data transmission system and a set of tidal bench
marks established in the vicinity of the tide station. The US National Ocean Service (NOS)
collects water level data at 6 minute intervals.
b. Tabulate the Tide – Once water level observations are quality controlled and any small
gaps filled, the data are processed by tabulating the high and low tides and hourly heights
for each day. Tidal parameters from these daily tabulations of the tide are then reduced to
mean values, typically on a calendar month basis for longer period records or over a few
days or weeks for shorter-term records.
c. Compute Tidal Datums – First reduction tidal datums are determined directly by meaning
values of the tidal parameters over a 19 year NTDE (National Tidal Datum Epoch).
Equivalent NTDE tidal datums are computed from tide stations operating for shorter time
periods through comparison of simultaneous data between the short term station and a long
term station.
d. Compute Bench Mark Elevations – Once the tidal datums are computed from the
tabulations, the elevations are transferred to the bench marks established on the land
through the elevation differences established by differential levelling between the tide
gauge sensor ‘zero’ and the bench marks during the station operation. The bench mark
elevations and descriptions are disseminated by NOS through a published bench mark sheet
for each station. Connections between tidal datum elevations and geodetic elevations are
obtained after levelling between tidal bench marks and geodetic network benchmarks.
Traditionally, this has been accomplished using differential levelling, however GPS
surveying techniques can also be used (NGS, 1997).
The locations of tide stations are organized into a hierarchy:
a. Control tide stations are generally those which have been operated for 19 or more years, are
expected to continuously operate in the future and are used to obtain a continuous record of
the water levels in a locality. Control tide stations are sited to provide datum control for
national applications and located in as many places as needed for datum control.
b. Secondary water level stations are those which are operated for less than 19 years but more
than 1 year and have a planned finite lifetime. Secondary stations provide control in bays
and estuaries where localized tidal effects are not realized at the nearest control station.
Observations at a secondary station are not usually sufficient for a precise independent
determination of tidal datums, but when reduced by comparison with simultaneous
observations at a suitable control tide station very satisfactory results may be obtained.
M-13
288
c. Tertiary water level stations are those which are operated for more than a month but less
than 1 year. Short-term water level measurement stations (secondary and tertiary) may
have their data reduced to equivalent 19 year tidal datums through mathematical
simultaneous comparison with a nearby control station.
Control (or primary) tide stations, secondary stations and tertiary stations are located at strategic locations
for network coverage. The site selection criteria include spatial coverage of significant changes in tidal
characteristics such as: changes in tide type, changes in range of tide, changes in time of tide, changes in
daily mean sea level and changes in long term mean sea level trends. Other criteria include coverage of
critical navigation areas and transitional zones, historical sites, proximity to the geodetic network and the
availability of existing structures, such as piers suitable for the location of the scientific equipment.
Procedure for Simultaneous Comparison:
Conceptually, the following steps need to be completed in order to compute equivalent NTDE tidal
datums at short term stations using the method of comparison of simultaneous observations:
a. select the time period over which the simultaneous comparison will be made;
b. select the appropriate control tide station for the subordinate station of interest;
c. obtain the simultaneous data from subordinate and control stations and obtain or tabulate
the tides and compute monthly means, as appropriate;
d. obtain the accepted (relative to the NTDE in the U.S. for example) values of the tidal
datums at the control station;
e. compute the mean differences and/or ratios (as appropriate) in the tidal parameters between
the subordinate and control station over the period of simultaneous comparison;
f. apply the mean differences and ratios computed in step e, above, to the accepted values at
the control station to obtain equivalent or corrected NTDE values for the subordinate
station.
Compute Bench Mark Elevations.
Once the tidal datums are computed from the tabulations, the elevations are transferred to the bench
marks established on the land through the elevation differences established by differential levelling
between the tide gauge sensor ‘zero’ and the bench marks during the station operation (NOS
Specifications and Deliverables, 2000). Connections between tidal datum elevations and geodetic
elevations are obtained after levelling between tidal bench marks and geodetic network benchmarks.
Traditionally, this has been accomplished using differential levelling, however GPS surveying techniques
can also be used (NGS, 1997).
2.2.7.1 Tidal Datum Recovery
Whenever tide stations are installed at historical sites, measures should be taken to ‘recover’ the
established tidal datums through levelling which should be accomplished by referencing the gauge or tide
staff ‘zero’ to more than one existing bench mark with a published tidal elevation. Through this process,
the published MLLW elevation is transferred by level differences to the ‘new’ gauge or tide staff and
compared to the MLLW elevation computed from the new data on the same ‘zero’. Factors affecting the
M-13
289
datum recovery (i.e. differences between old and newly computed datums) include the length of each data
series used to compute the datums, the geographical location, the tidal characteristics in the region, the
length of time between re-occupations, the sea level trends in the region and the control station used.
Based on all of these factors, the datum recovery can be expected to vary from +/- 0.03 m to +/- 0.08 m.
Hence, this process also serves as a very useful quality control procedure. After a successful datum
recovery is performed and benchmark stability is established, the historical value of Mean Lower Low
Water (MLLW) should be used as the operational datum reference for data from the gauge during
hydrographic survey operations.
2.2.7.2 Quality Control of Datums
It is essential for tidal datum quality control to have data processing and levelling procedures carried out
to the fullest extent. Caution must also be used in computing tidal datums in riverine systems or in
regions of unknown tidal regimes. Tide-by-tide comparisons between subordinate and control station
data will often detect anomalous differences which should be investigated for possible gauge malfunction
or sensor movement. Datums should be established from more than one bench mark. Differences in
elevations between bench marks based on new levelling must agree with previously established
differences from the published bench mark sheets. Any changes in the elevation differences must be
reconciled before using in any datum recovery procedure. Datum accuracy at a subordinate station
depends on various factors, but availability and choice of an adequate control station of similar tidal
characteristics, similar daily mean sea level and seasonal mean sea level variations, and similar sea level
trends are the most important. The length of series will also determine accuracy. The longer the series,
the more accurate the datum and the greater quality control and confidence gained from analyzing
numerous monthly mean differences between the subordinate and control station. At re-occupied
historical stations for which datum recoveries are made, updated datums should be computed from the
new time series and compared with the historical datums as the survey progresses.
2.2.7.3 Geodetic Datum Relationships
Tidal datums are local vertical datums which may change considerably within a geographical area. A
geodetic datum is a fixed plane of reference for vertical control of land elevations. The North American
Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) is the accepted geodetic reference datum of the U.S. National
Geodetic Spatial Reference System and is officially supported by the National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
through a network of GPS continuously operating reference stations. The relationship of tidal datums to
NAVD has many hydrographic, coastal mapping and engineering applications including monitoring sea
level change and the deployment of GPS electronic chart display and information systems, etc. In some
countries, the local datum of Mean Sea Level (MSL) has been confused over time with the national
geodetic reference datum because the geodetic datums were originally derived from MSL measurements
at tide gauges. However as relative sea level has changed with vertical land movement and global sea
level rise, the geodetic datums became de-coupled from local oceanographic MSL. NAVD88, for
instance, used only one tide station as a starting reference and is not considered a MSL correlated datum.
Existing geodetic marks in the vicinity of a subordinate tidal station should be searched for and recovered.
A search routine is available at http://www.ngs.noaa.gov. An orthometric level connection and
ellipsoidal GPS tie is required at a subordinate tide station which has geodetic bench marks located
nearby. NAVD 88 height elevations for published bench marks are given in Helmert orthometric height
units by NGS. The GPS ellipsoid network height accuracies are classified as conforming to 2 cm or 5 cm
standards accuracies (Refer to NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NGS-58). At the present time, GPS
ellipsoid heights conforming to the 2 cm accuracy standards are required for contract hydrographic
surveying projects. Refer to Section 4.2.8 GPS Observations and User’s Guide for GPS Observations,
NOAA/NOS, updated January 2003.
M-13
290
An orthometric level connection is preferred over ellipsoidal GPS tie, where applicable, for deriving
NAVD 88 heights. An orthometric level connection is required if any geodetic marks (up to five marks)
are located within a radius of 0.8 km from the subordinate tide station location. If suitable marks are
found in the NGS database, and are farther than 0.8 km but less than 10 km from a subordinate tide
station, then a GPS tie is required to derive the ellipsoid heights. If a minimum of five existing tidal
bench marks within 1 km of a subordinate tide station location are not found, or suitable geodetic marks
are not found in the NGS database within 10 km of a subordinate tide station, then five new bench marks
should be installed, described, connected by levels, and GPS observations should be undertaken on at
least one of the five marks. (Refer to User’s Guide for Writing Bench Mark Descriptions, NOAA/NOS,
Updated January 2002, User’s Guide for GPS Observations, NOAA/NOS, Updated January 2003, and
Section 4.2.8 GPS Observations.) At least two geodetic bench marks should be used to validate the
levelling or GPS ellipsoid height connection for quality control purposes.
2.2.8 Final Zoning and Tide Reducers
Data relative to MLLW from subordinate stations installed specifically for the survey, or from existing
primary control stations, as appropriate, should be applied to reduce sounding data to chart datum, either
directly or indirectly through a correction technique referred to as tidal zoning. Whether corrected or
direct, time series data relative to MLLW or other applicable LWD applied to reference hydrographic
soundings to chart datum are referred to as ‘tide reducers’ or ‘water level reducers’.
2.2.8.1 Construction of Final Tidal Zoning Schemes
As tidal characteristics vary spatially, data from deployed water level gauges may not be representative of
water levels across a survey area. Tidal zoning should be implemented to facilitate the provision of time
series water level data relative to chart datum for any point within the survey area such that prescribed
accuracy requirements are maintained for the water level measurement component of the hydrographic
survey. NOS currently utilises the ‘discrete tidal zoning’ method for operations, where survey areas are
broken up into a scheme of cells bounding areas of common tidal characteristics. The minimum
requirement is for a new cell for every 0.06 m change in mean range of tide and every 0.3 hour
progression in time of tide (Greenwich high and low water intervals). Phase and amplitude corrections
for appropriate tide station data should be assigned to each cell.
Preliminary zoning, which is based on available historical tide station data and estuarine and global tide
models, is referenced to an applicable predictions reference station for utilisation during field work. For
final processing, preliminary zoning should be superseded by ‘final zoning’ which is a refinement based
on new data collected at subordinate stations during the survey. With the final zoning scheme, correctors
for each zone should be derived from a subordinate station specifically installed for the survey rather than
the reference station used with preliminary zoning. Zoning errors should be minimized such that when
combined with errors from actual water level measurement at the gauge and errors in reduction to chart
datum, the total error of the tide reducers is within specified tolerances. The final zoning scheme and all
data utilized in its development should be documented and submitted.
2.2.8.2 Tide Reducer Files and Final Tide Note
Verified time series data collected at appropriate subordinate stations are referenced to the NTDE Mean
Lower Low Water (Chart Datum) through datum computation procedures. Time series data collected in
six minute intervals and reduced to chart datum as specified, both from subordinate gauges operated
during the survey should be used either directly or corrected through use of a zoning scheme such that
tide reducers are within specified tolerances. A Final Tide Note should be submitted for each
hydrographic sheet with information as to what final tidal zoning should be applied to which stations to
obtain the final tide reducers. An example Final tide Note and final tidal zoning graphic is found in
Figures 5.16 and 5.17.
M-13
291
Fig. 5.16 “FINAL TIDE NOTE and FINAL TIDAL ZONING CHART”
DATE: December 22, 1999

HYDROGRAPHIC BRANCH: Pacific
HYDROGRAPHIC PROJECT: OPR-P342-RA-99
HYDROGRAPHIC SHEET: H-10910
LOCALITY: 6 NM Northwest of Cape Kasilof, AK
TIME PERIOD: July 22 - August 20, 1999
TIDE STATION USED: 945-5711 Cape Kasilof, AK

Lat. 60o 20.2'N Lon. 151o 22.8'W
PLANE OF REFERENCE (MEAN LOWER LOW WATER): 0.000 meters
HEIGHT OF HIGH WATER ABOVE PLANE OF REFERENCE: 5.850 meters
REMARKS: RECOMMENDED ZONING
Use zone(s) identified as: CK394, CK395, CK399, CK400, CK401,
CK407, CK408, CK409, CK434, CK435, CK441, CK442, CK443, CK467, CK468, CK469, CK470,
CK477, CK480, CK481, CK482, CK483, CK493 & CK494.
Refer to attachments for zoning information.
Note 1: Provided time series data are tabulated in metric units
(Meters), relative to MLLW and on Greenwich Mean Time.
Note 2: Nikiski, AK served as datum control for subordinate tide stations and for tidal zoning in this
hydrographic survey. Accepted datums for this station have been updated recently and have changed
significantly from previous values.
The current National Tidal Datum Epoch (NTDE) used to compute tidal datums at tide stations is the
1960-78 NTDE. Traditionally, NTDEs have been adjusted when significant changes in mean sea level
(MSL) trends were found through analyses amongst the National Water Level Observation Network
(NWLON) stations. Epochs are updated to ensure that tidal datums are the most accurate and practical
for navigation, surveying and engineering applications and reflect the existing local sea level conditions.
For instance, analyses of sea level trends show that a new NTDE is necessary and efforts are underway to
update the 1960-1978 NTDE to a more recent 19 year time period.
Note: This example of Field Tide Note and Final Tidal Zoning Chart was written in December 1999, at
that time NTDE was 1960-1978, now the new NTDE is 1983-2001.
M-13
292
Fig. 5.17
The final observed water level measurements should be reported as heights in meters to three decimal
places (i.e. 0.001 m). All heights should be referenced to station datum and should be referenced to UTC.
The final tide reducer time series data should be referenced to MLLW and should be referenced to UTC.
The original raw water level data and also the correctors used to convert the data to chart datum should be
retained until notified in writing or at least two years after the survey is completed. All algorithms and
conversions used to provide correctors should be fully supported by the calibrations, maintenance
documentation, levelling records and sound engineering/oceanographic practices. Sensors for
measurements used to convert data (i.e. pressure to heights) should be calibrated and maintained for the
entire water level collection period.
2.2.9 Using Kinematic GPS for Vertical Control
The technology of using Kinematic GPS for vertical control in hydrographic surveying is becoming much
more commonplace after being in a research-to-operations mode for several years. Kinematic GPS is a
form of centimetre level-differential positioning which uses primarily carrier phase observables in which
the differential corrections are formulated in conjunction with a mobile GPS receiver (i.e. a ship or
launch) and at least one static base station.
Kinematic GPS requires an accurate horizontal and vertical reference frame in order to determine an
accurate position on each sounding, relative to NAD83 (for instance), and to determine an accurate depth
of each sounding such as MLLW, LAT or other appropriate local chart datum. The issue of determining
the separation between kinematic differential GPS vertical datum and the local chart datum is important
to resolve for each survey area. This separation is not constant and may be quite complex. They are
usually not well known and may require additional measurements to understand the complexity of the
geodesy in the area as well as the tidal characteristics. Constant relationships may be adequate in small
survey areas, simple interpolation in others; or complex interpolation models and continuous zoning
schemes may be required. Tidal datums, bathymetry and geodesy must be put into the same vertical
reference frame prior to the survey operations.
M-13
293
The availability of control for use of kinematic GPS for surveying must be evaluated during planning and
if required, geodetic and tidal datum control must be established before operational collection of
soundings to establish the relationship of the tidal datum and GPS reference surfaces throughout the
survey area. The amount of field work required is dependent on the adequacy of existing tide and
geodetic control (NOS, 2000).
3. WATER LEVEL FLOW AND TIDAL CURRENTS
3.1 Introduction
The hydrographer is required to have working knowledge of predicted and observed oceanographic and
meteorological conditions to be able to conduct successful field data collection surveys and to conduct
safe and efficient navigation necessary for the surveys. Besides the rise and fall of the tides, the tidal
currents are often a predominant variable that affects field operations. Often the hydrographer is not only
required to take soundings for nautical chart production, but must assess the tidal characteristics and the
movements of the tidal currents and be able to describe them for such applications as the coast pilot
volumes and tidal prediction products. In addition, the hydrographer is often required to deploy and
retrieve current meter instrumentation and moorings.
3.2 Principles of Tidal Currents
Water current is horizontal movement of water. Currents may be classified as tidal and non-tidal. Tidal
currents are caused by gravitational interactions between the Sun, Moon, and Earth and are part of the
same general movement of the oceans which results in the vertical rise and fall of the tide. Non-tidal
currents include the permanent currents in the general circulatory systems of the sea as well as temporary
currents arising from more pronounced meteorological variability.
Much like tidal datums and heights, various countries use various terminology to describe the same
phenomena. The United Kingdom uses the term tidal streams instead of tidal current and the term tidal
flow to describe the actual flow or total current flow, which is a combination of tidal and non-tidal
components.
Residuals are sometimes referred to as the difference between observed total and predicted tidal currents
or the difference between tidal streams and tidal flow. Although tidal currents are derived from the same
tide producing forces as the tide, tidal currents are much more variable and complex to predict than the
tidal heights. The rise and fall of the tide is termed a scalar (varying heights only) quantity while tidal
currents are vector (both speed and associated direction vary) quantities. Speed and direction of currents
at a given location not only vary over time, but with depth as well. And the characteristics of the current
at any given location cannot be extended very far, especially in areas of complex shallow water
bathymetry and complex topography (shoreline configurations). Current patterns in complex areas also
may exhibit eddies and gyres of various sizes set up by bathymetry and channel configuration on shallow
waters. It is not uncommon to find current shear patterns in which there are significant changes in
direction and amplitude. Because of this spatial variability, tidal predictions derived from a current meter
measurement are typically only valid for a small area at a given depth, and are not necessarily transferable
within a region or throughout a water column.
Types of non-tidal currents include:
• Oceanic circulation currents;

• Gyres, Western and Eastern Boundary currents, Equatorial counter-current, etc.;
• Thermohaline circulation;
M-13
294
• Wind driven currents (Ekman to about 100M);

• Seiches;
• River flow and hydraulic currents.
In the open ocean, tidal currents or streams tend to be rotary in nature (Figure 5.18). In theory if the earth
were covered completely by water, at the time when the earth or sun is aligned with the Equator, the tidal
currents at the equator would move back and forth (east and west) in a reversing manner in response to
the tides. With latitude, the currents would show elliptical patterns increasing with latitude to a circular
pattern at the poles. The pattern at any given latitude would vary depending upon declination of the
Moon or Sun. The effects of coriolis force also reinforce the rotary nature of the currents on the ocean
such that they rotate clockwise in the northern hemisphere and counter(anti)-clockwise in the southern
hemisphere.
Tidal Currents
Figure 5.18
• Offshore or unrestricted
– Rotary
• In/near-shore or restricted
– Reversing
Fig. 5.18
In the near shore areas, tidal currents and streams tend to be more reversing in nature responding to the
bathymetry and topography of the estuaries and bays (Figure 5.19). The phases of reversing currents are
described as having slack periods, maximum floods and maximum ebbs. Slack water is the short time
period between the reversal from flood to ebb. Typically, flood currents are those which are incoming or
towards the shore or upstream. Ebb currents are those which are outgoing, offshore or downstream.
These tides will show many of the characteristics of the tide described for tidal heights. Floods and ebbs
will display semi-diurnal, mixed and diurnal tide characteristics very similar to the corresponding tidal
height characteristics in a given area. Their strengths and velocities will exhibit variations in response to
changing declinations of the Moon and Sun and to the perigee/apogee and perihelion/aphelion cycles
(Figure 5.4). Tidal currents in mixed tide regimes display inequalities in the floods and ebbs each day,
just like the tidal heights.
The current direction is sometimes referred to as the set and the speed is sometimes referred to as the
drift. The current direction, by convention, is the compass direction toward which current flows (the
opposite of the convention for winds). Speeds are defined in terms of knots (navigation) or meters/sec
(scientific) (1 knot = 0.51444 m/s).
Hydraulic currents are currents due to the height difference in water level of two interconnected basins
(Hell’s Gate New York, Cape Cod Canal & the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal). The height differences
M-13
295
in tidal waters are caused by the phase difference in the tide at each end of a strait or a canal. Non-tidal
hydraulic currents occur in the interconnecting water ways of the Great Lakes for instance and typically
are in a downstream direction only.
Restricted Waterway
Reversing Current
Tides and Water Levels for Surveying and Mapping
Fig. 5.19
In theory, tidal currents should have consistent relationships between the times and strengths of the flood
and ebbs and the times and heights of the high and low tides because they are related and forced by the
same tide producing forces. However the response of basins and estuaries to the tide producing forces
and the resulting relationships of tidal current to tidal heights is complex and varies by location. In some
locations, maximum currents occur at mid-tide and at others, maximum currents occur nearer high and
low tides.
3.3 Measurement of Currents
There are two distinct methods for measuring currents: Lagrangian use of floats, dyes, drift cards,
drifters, or current drogues and Eulerian use of a current meter at a single location(s). Both types have
their advantages and disadvantages depending upon the application. Lagrangian devices require tracking
of concentrations or changes in position of drifters over time, they are useful for trajectory modelling and
forecasting for application to HAZMAT spills and oil spills or for studies of estuarine circulation patterns.
Sub-surface drifters can also be deployed to track bottom currents. Eulerian devices provide good time
series information of currents at specific locations and depths used in traditional tidal current prediction
applications for recreational and commercial navigation and fisheries vessel operations. Both types of
measurements are useful for complete understanding of current regimes and for the development and
calibration of hydrodynamic circulation models. Hydrographic survey vessels may be required to deploy
a variety of current measurement devices depending upon the survey area and the information required.
M-13
296
The earliest current measurement systems were Lagrangian in nature, using drifting ship tracks or using
drift poles deployed from ships. For near-shore work, these were replaced by moored current meter
systems of various mechanical and electro-mechanical designs. These systems are installed in sub-
surface mooring designs with several meters deployed along the vertical mooring line depending upon
depth with the top current meter deployed as close to the surface as possible. Mechanical current meters
use combinations of vanes, rotors and propellers to measure speed and direction. The meters are
generally internal recording with the data collected upon retrieval. Deployment periods are generally
short-term (a few months maximum). Modern current meter systems use acoustic doppler current profiler
(ADCP) technology to measure current profiles in the water column over time from a bottom mounted
current meter. ADCPs can also be deployed horizontally to measure across channel currents over time at
fixed depths and can be towed to measure currents with depth over cross channel transects. These current
meters can also be deployed from surface buoys in a downward looking direction and can be configured
to provide data in real-time using acoustic modem technology or direct cables depending upon the
deployment. The ADCPs provide profiles of current speed and direction by providing information for
fixed vertical bins in the water column. Figure 5.20 shows some typical deployment configurations for
current meters.
Modern Methods of Measurement
Deployment OF ADCP
system in Petersburg, AK
From NOAA ship RAINIER
Underwater view of ADCP View of ADCP bottom-

mounted to a catamaran mount showing how
pod releases from base
Fig. 5.20
New high frequency radar systems are being developed that provide surface current maps over wide-areas
which should also be beneficial to conducting hydrographic survey operations. These shore-based
systems use a transponder and receiver antennae to provide current vectors for fixed surface area bins in
near-real-time (see Figure 5.21).
M-13
297
Fig. 5.21
3.4 Tidal Current Prediction
Tidal currents, like tidal heights, can be predicted because they are caused by the interaction of the well-
known Earth-Moon-Sun system. Also, like tidal height predictions, tidal currents are predicted by
performing harmonic analysis of measurements obtained from preferably 29 days of data to span an entire
lunar month. A minimum of 15 days of data can be used for harmonic analysis currents, simply because
it is historically and logistically hard to routinely obtain more than that in a typical deployment. Although
the approach and theory are the same for harmonic analysis of tides and tidal currents, analyses of tidal
currents are more complex. For example, for reversing currents, two sets of constituents are obtained for
the major and minimum axes with the major axis being the principal current direction. In addition, the
analysis must try to handle the presence of any non-tidal permanent current found in the analysis of the
observations.
Mariners are generally interested in the timing and strength of four phases of the tidal current cycle.
NOAA (U.S.) tide prediction tables include predictions for slack before flood (SBF), maximum flood
current (MFC), slack before ebb (SBE), and maximum ebb current (MEC). In areas where the currents
are never at true slack (zero speed), slack flood current (SFC) and slack ebb current (SEC) values are
M-13
298
predicted as well. Tidal current prediction stations also utilise the same concept of reference stations and
secondary stations in the tide table products such that speed ratios are used to correct daily reference
station predictions to the desired location(s).
Predictions of tidal currents have similar limitations to those for tidal height predictions. Extreme care
must be taken to extrapolate a tide or tidal current prediction beyond the location of the measurement.
This is especially the case for tidal currents due to the nature of the spatial variation in speed and direction
in shallow water estuaries and rivers, the significant affects of non-tidal forcing due to river flow, wind
speed and direction and natural non-tidal circulation patterns. Just as for tidal heights, tidal current
predictions are much less useful in areas with low signal-to-noise ratio (low tidal forcing relative to non-
tidal forcing).
M-13
299
REFERENCES
Admiralty Manual of Hydrographic Surveying, Volume Two, The Hydrographer of the Navy, U.K.,
Chapter 2, Tides and Tidal Streams, 1969.
“Canadian Tidal Manual”, Warren D. Forrester, Ph. D. under contract to Department of Fisheries and
Oceans, Ottawa, 1983.
“Computational Techniques for Tidal Datums”, NOAA Technical Report NOS CO-OPS 2, U.S.
Department of Commerce, NOAA, NOS, December 2003.
“Guidelines for Establishing GPS-Derived Ellipsoid Heights (Standards: 2CM and 5CM)”, Version 4.3,
NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NGS-58, November 1997.
“Manual of Tide Observations”, U.S. Department of Commerce, Publication 30-1, Reprinted 1965.
“NOS Hydrographic Survey Specifications and Deliverables”, NOAA, National Ocean Service, Office of
Coast Survey, Silver Spring, Maryland, U.S.A., March 2003.
“NOS RTK Team Final Report”, NOAA/NOS Team Final Report, August 31, 2000.
“Standards and Specifications for Geodetic Control Networks”, U.S. Federal Geodetic Control
Committee, September 1984.
“Tide and Current Glossary”, U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, NOS, October 1989.
“Tidal Datum Planes”, U.S. Department of Commerce, Special Publication No.135, Marmer, 1951.
“Tidal Datums and Their Applications”, Special Publication No. CO-OPS 1, NOAA/NOS, June 2000.
“Understanding Tides”, Steacy Dopp Hicks, December 2004.
“Variability of Tidal Datums and Accuracy in Determining Datums from Short Series of Observations”,
NOAA Technical Report NOS 64, Swanson, 1974.
__________
M-13
300
M-13
301
CHAPTER 6
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING
1. INTRODUCTION
From the hydrographic point of view a Topographic Survey consists of a series of tasks carried out with
the aim of determining the composition of those parts of the earth’s surface which emerge from the water.
It includes the coastal relief and the location of permanent natural or artificial objects and features.
Such information is partly obtained by determining the position of points on the ground, which allows
their shape as well as details of the features to be depicted, enabling their location and description to be
charted. Other sources of data include remote sensing processes from aerial photogrammetric
information, other airborne sensors or satellite imagery products. In these cases it is necessary to create
ground control points in order to adjust the information to the reference frame in use.
The term topography often has other applications, for example in oceanography it is used to depict
seafloor surfaces or the boundaries of certain water mass characteristics. All these meanings share a
common external description of surfaces covering a physical body.
This chapter deals with the methods applicable to the description of coastal features as part of
hydrographic surveys, particularly with regards to the appearance of the ground and the location of detail.
It includes coastlining and location fixes, generally related to the high water line for marine surveys, the
information on these areas ranges from this line to the low water line, as well as conspicuous coastal
features which allow the mariner to position himself relative to near shore dangers.
Except in harbours or coastal areas, where operations or projects are planned or expected to be
undertaken, it is necessary to make detailed observations of coastal formations by topographic survey
methods.
In some cases, much of the topographic surveying may be undertaken via photogrammetric processes. In
these surveys, control is achieved by positioning details on the ground which may be identified in images.
Additionally it is necessary to add information which may provide a proper interpretation of the structure
of coastal features.
In coastal topographic surveys it is also essential to locate all aids to navigation within the surveying area;
if required, the horizontal and vertical geodetic control network should be made denser. In all these cases,
it is essential that the reference system for the topographic survey co-ordinates, the geodetic control and
aids to navigation (reference stations, lights, beacons, etc.) is consistent with the reference system used
for the rest of the hydrographic survey. This precaution is fundamental for the mariner, who positions
himself with the use of the aids to navigation and other coastal details, to be able to rely on the charted
depths at every fix.
This chapter will deal first with the methods applied to land surveying, then it will deal with remote
sensing ranging from photogrammetric processes to satellite imagery.
M-13
302
Except for the restatement of some basic principles, which are deemed essential, it is assumed the reader
has previously examined Chapter 2 (Positioning) where subjects related to co-ordinates on the spheroid
and the plane, horizontal/vertical control methods and positioning equipment and methods are covered in
more depth.
2. TOPOGRAPHY, COASTLINE DELINEATION AND AIDS TO NAVIGATION

POSITIONING
2.1 Specifications
2.1.1 All tasks shall assume, as a minimum, the specifications stated in publication S-44 (IHO
Standards for Hydrographic Surveying), particularly those relating to Chapter 2.
2.1.2 In S-44 2.2, a relative accuracy of 1:100000 (10 ppm) for Primary Horizontal Control, or an error
below 10 cm for a 95% confidence level, is expected. For secondary stations (primary control
densification), the relative error limit expected for such standard is 1:10000 (100 ppm), or an
error below 0.50m.
2.1.3 In S-44 2.4, errors for a 95% confidence level with regard to positions for other important details
and coastal features are expected to be below the following limits:
TABLE 6.1 (TABLE 2 ON S-44)

SPECIAL ORDER ORDER 1 ORDERS
2 and 3
Fixed aids and conspicuous
2m 2m 5m
objects for navigation
Coastline 10 m 20 m 20 m
Floating aids to navigation 10 m 10 m 20 m
Topographic features 10 m 20 m 20 m
2.1.4 Thorough checks must be conducted to confirm that the reference system used to show all the
control point co-ordinates is the same. Verification should include an analysis of records and
whenever doubts arise, field checking should be included.
2.1.5 To check positioning accuracies, a strict routine for cross checking between physically obtained
control point details and the supplied co-ordinates should be instituted. This will avoid the
situation of co-ordinates from measured closed circuits returning to the same control point being
exclusively used; instead, other ways of ensuring the expected consistency should be included.
Therefore, at least one connection that ensures the transfer of co-ordinates from one control point
to another should be included in the applied measurements.
2.1.6 When satellite services (GNSS) are used for altimetric purposes, it should be ensured that, besides
the accuracy of the process being undertaken, corrections between heights above the reference
spheroid used and the mean sea level are accurate enough for level calculations to be made with
errors below those in S-44 4.2, that is ± 5 cm for Special Order, and ± 10 cm for Orders 1, 2 and
3. The main purpose of this precaution is to meet the requirements directly associated with sea
levels, water intakes or artificial outlets, surveying for coastal projects, ground control for
photogrammetry, harbour surveys, etc.
M-13
303
Exceptions to these requirements are surveys intended to show the coastline from the sea, the
sea-level positioning for conspicuous objects or the heighting of lights, signals and beacons where
errors up ± 0.3 m are allowed for groups of signals (leading lines) and up to ± 0.5 m for an
isolated signal or object. In the case of ground control points intended to define the coastline
shape, the error tolerance can be ± 0.5 m for Special Order and ± 1 m for Orders 1 or 2, when the
ground slope is below 10%. On steeper slopes error tolerance can be up to ± 1 m ±·0.8 iH, where
H is the horizontal error, which is shown in Table 6.1 and i is the slope (elevation angle tangent).
2.1.7 The principle methods of coastlining are:
a. Real Time Kinematic with GNSS (RTK trough GPS, etc.);

b. Resection fixes (EDOM, sextant, theodolite, etc.);
c. Traverses (EODM, Total Stations, level and tachstaff, tachymetry or sextant and 10’ pole)*;
d. Intersection (EODM, theodolite or sextant);
e. Air photography;
f. Existing maps.
(*) In traverses with sextant and 10’ pole, the horizontal angles are measured by sextant (see
5.3.1 at Chapter 2) as well as the distances with a special rod, where an angle is converted into a
distance (parallactic method, through the measure between two separate marks of a known
distance apart).
2.1.8 The methods used will depend upon the scale of the survey, the time and the equipment available;
i.e. existing maps, where small details can be shown, could well be used for scales of 1:50000 or
smaller (1:100000). Similarly air photography can be used, but it is likely that such images will
be reduced and interpreted as necessary at the National Hydrographic Office (NHO).
Photogrammetric restitution is also a suitable method (derived from aerial information), but it is
advisable to complement this process with ground data collected during the field reconnaissance.
2.2 Positioning methods and Accuracies
2.2.1 GNSS (See 6.1 at Chapter 2)
Methods using single navigation systems are only applicable for cases for which, as shown in Table 6.1,
errors of ± 20 m are acceptable. Using particular caution, including an experimental calculation for
corrections to points known before and after surveying for periods over 2 hours between sunrise and
sunset, it could be applied to cases which, according to the Table above, require ± 10 m accuracies as long
as the calculation of such corrections are consistent with the given limits.
Methods using the observable codes in differential mode (DGPS, etc.) with reference stations at geodetic
control points may be used for cases requiring ± 5 m for the highest accuracies. In cases with more
accurate requirements (i.e. ± 2 m Table 6.1), the processes used should be phase measurement of carrier
waves L1, L1/L2, etc.
M-13
304
In these cases, the following possible vector errors should be considered:
TABLE 6.2
VECTOR LENGTH L1 L1/L2
Up to 10 Km ± 1 cm ± 1 ppm
10 to 40 Km ± 1 cm ± 2 ppm ± 1 cm ± 1 ppm
40 to 200 Km
NOT APPLICABLE
Above 200 Km ± 2 cm ± 2 ppm (*)
(*) With suitable time periods, special equipment and software, errors may be below ± 1 cm ± 1 ppm.
Regarding Table 6.2, it should be noted that upon the expected GNSS development from 2005,
consideration should be given for updating to allow provision for the additional band L5 and the full
operational reception compatible of GPS, GLONASS and GALILEO.
Likewise, the increasing potential of operating using real-time kinematic (RTK) mode suggests that its
use may exceed present surveying capabilities and its use for some ground control positioning may be
expected. For the present (2004), such techniques may be considered to have errors of ± 5 cm ±5 ppm.
Moreover, within GNSS development, not withstanding the above, new differential services, in addition
to those already existing, are planned to come into operation:
- Ground - Based Augmentation Systems (GBASs) with transmissions from earth stations near
airports as well as other intensively used sites;
- Satellite - Based Augmentation Systems (SBASs) with satellites receiving differential

correction signals from different stations and then transmitting adjusted corrections. One of
the most complete networks scheduled to become fully operational by 2005 is the so-called
WAAS (Wide Area Augmentation System) sponsored by USFAA (US Federal Aviation
Association).
Some of these services are operating with different characteristics, though they are expected to increase in
number and introduce greater capabilities. This exploitation has generated the possibility of conducting
more surveys without the need of establishing reference stations. Nevertheless, it is not advisable to be
over optimistic with its application if there is no relatively near earth station contributing to the system.
Another method is to implement active station networks, the reception of which is centralized and
transmits precise ephemeris calculations which are applicable to a particular region.
Returning to coded differential equipment with base stations operating on control points, there are some
which, by means of a so-called "sub-metric" treatment, may achieve errors in the order of 10 cm ± 10
ppm without strictly using the L phase of carriers and allow base-rover distances as much as 10 Km.
There is a wide variety of equipment on offer but very few fulfil such error limits. It is, therefore,
advisable to check the procedures with a test by stationing them at several distances on the existing
control points in order to obtain a reliable assessment.
For the remainder of this chapter, it is assumed that the equipment in use is measuring the phases of
carrier wave(s) (L1 or L1/2) within the limitations stated in Table 2 and RTK mode error (± 5 cm ± 5
ppm) as mentioned.
M-13
305
Ideally, to carry out a topographic survey, all the points should be surveyed from base stations with
control marks. Wherever existing control points are not sufficient it should be expedient to increase the
density of them. Fig. 1 illustrates such a plan, i.e. from existing network marks, new control points are
generated by GNSS vectors using geodetic receivers in a static relative mode. To make corrections to
geodetic heights (above the spheroid), in order to obtain heights above mean sea level or others associated
with it (see Chapter 2), it is necessary to tie in altimetric control points.
It is desirable that photogrammetric ground control points and aid to navigation signals are calculated, as
a minimum, from two control points. Faster methods such as stop and go or real-time kinematic (RTK)
modes may be applied both to these types of control points and to surveyed ground features, as long as
they meet the requirements in Table 6.1.
If, while surveying, the need arises for the generation of additional control points, they should be obtained
from two previously determined control points.
Fig. 6.1
M-13
306
The ease of creating new control points as well as the cost of building and preserving bench marks, or
other marks, is setting the trend for minimum monumentation. In such cases, illustrations such as Fig. 6.2
may be chosen.
Fig. 6.2
Besides serving as a base for rover receiver reference, GNSS survey stations are connected to each other
by static relative vector measurements thus forming, as a minimum, a traverse between control points
without generating additional monumentation. In most cases, these traverses will have been measured
with the same instruments as used to survey ground features.
M-13
307
2.2.2 Triangulation (See 3.2.1 at Chapter 2)
It is a technique based on principal angular measurements. Before the middle of the 20th century, it was
the most common method for establishing geodetic control networks and for sole calculation of
conspicuous points, marks and other aids to navigation or photogrammetric ground control points. Since
the 1960s Electronic Distance Measuring equipment (EDM) or Electro Optical Distance Measurement
(EODM) has superseded the above methods. More recently they have been replaced by satellite methods,
particularly since a permanent global coverage was established in the 1990´s
The earliest form of triangulation for hydrographic purposes consisted of a series of observations as in
Fig. 6.3, with a relatively small number of measured sides (baselines) and a large number of angular
measurements, which are showed here with the observed directions. Such a diagram provides a great deal
of redundancy; each double-diagonal quadrilateral has three angular verifications created by adding or
subtracting values. Nevertheless the network scale is still determined by the baselines.
In old unconnected geodetic controls, position and orientation were established from astronomic
observations of latitude, longitude and azimuth in a datum. Now days, if marks are use from these kinds
of networks, it is usually necessary to re-observe and recalculate via GNSS in order to convert co-
ordinates into a universal system like WGS 84 (see 2.2.3 at Chapter 2).
In general it should be noted that distances from the baselines could be measured within accuracies
ranging from 1ppm to 3ppm, directions from ± 0.5" to ± 2", and transition from a base to another (that is,
the contrast between the base transfer by triangle resolution and the other measured base) could normally
be checked within 20 ppm and 40 ppm.
These limitations should be taken into account when trying to adjust an old triangulation network to a
present framework via GNSS observations, with distances of 200 or 300 km there can be differences of
several meters (2 or 3). Besides tolerating differences of these orders, it is necessary to have a sufficient
number of well-distributed connections to common datums and of datum conversion algorithms in order
to absorb the distortions typical of the old networks (see Chapter 2)
Not withstanding the above statement, densification by GNSS of datums with fixed co-ordinates
computed from old triangulations should be avoided; such cases often lead to distortions and inaccuracies
in the final results. If unavoidable due to the need to keep the co-ordinates of an old datum, it will be
necessary to adopt very particular computation strategies and the limitations of the values obtained must
be stated at an early stage.
M-13
308
Fig. 6.3
A control network with the characteristics as in Fig. 6.3 had, in general, sides with lengths ranging from
15 to 25 km, 18 km on average, with triangle closure errors from ± 1" to ± 2"; this was termed first-order
triangulation. The following densifications had shorter sides (10 to 15 km) with closure errors from ± 2"
to ± 4"; they were designated second-order triangulation. There were also third-order and fourth-order
triangulations with shorter sides and higher tolerances, ± 5", for third-order triangulation, and ± 10", for
fourth-order triangulation. Table 6.3 details typical values and aspects of these orders.
M-13
309
Table 6.3
TRIANGULATION MEASURES CHARACTERISICS

ORDER SIDES TYPICAL TYPICAL TYPICAL TRIANGLE
LENGHTS THEODOLITE NUMBER OF DIRECTIO CLOUSURE
(Km) DIRECT REITERA N ERROR ERROR
READING TIONS (*) (“) TOLERANCE (“)
ERROR
(“) (*)
1st. 15 to 25 0.1 to 0.2 9 to 18 0.1 to 0.5 1 to 2
nd
2 . 10 to 15 1” 6 to 9 1 to 2 2 to 4
3rd. 5 to 10 1” to 10” 4 to 6 2 to 3 5
4th 2 to 10 10” 2 to 4 5 10
(*) See 5.3.2 at Chapter 2
For each order of work, the co-ordinates of the higher orders were taken as fixed co-ordinates and
generally the baselines and astronomical stations were exclusively for the highest two orders.
In lower order work, it was normal to select a few higher order points at a time, as in Fig. 6.4 left; though
in some cases for control densification networks selection of a larger number of points with shorter side
observations (Fig. 6.4, right) was carried out, particularly whenever triangulation towers had been
removed. These towers were used to elevate the line of sight over trees, topographic features and other
obstacles interfering with the observations. Obviously their removal prevented long sights from being
conducted which led to this type of solution.
M-13
310
Fig. 6.4
In some cases, in hydrographic surveying, the term triangulation has been used to describe survey points
with flare triangulation by intersection (see 2.2.4). These flares were dropped with parachutes vertically
over the point to be located and, whilst burning, directions from control points would be simultaneously
observed; this was conducted towards many coastal points requiring to be surveyed, as many were not
visible. Balloons, luminous shots or mobile, elevated signals were also used for the same purposes.
The term triangulation has also been used when measuring angles to control points with a sextant,
sometimes in combination with observations from such points. The exclusive use of observations from
points to be calculated is treated as a resection in 2.2.4.
Although these survey techniques are becoming obsolete due to intensive use of other more responsive
modern methods, they still are effective.
M-13
311
One of the typical problems of triangulation is the error propagation dependence on the figure shapes, on
which the error results (positions) rely not only on the measurement error but also on the network
geometry. This problem is dealt with for particular cases in 2.2.4 though it admits more complex
generalisations. For example, a single chain of equilateral triangles is more rigid than a chain with
unequal angles. Also, a two-diagonal square chain is more rigid than a chain with rectangles or
trapeziums with similar diagonals.
2.2.3 Traverse (See 3.3.1 to 3.3.4 at Chapter 2)
Before the 1950-1960 decade, use of combined distances and directions was restricted to small areas but
later, with the development of EDM and EODM equipment, larger networks with longer sides (5, 10, 15,
20, ... km) could be created. As stated at the beginning of 2.2.2, these techniques superseded
triangulation.
For some time (about 1960) a new technique based on exclusive side measurement (trilateration) (See
3.2.2 at Chapter 2) was considered but it was quickly rejected, mainly due to a lack of internal checks. To
clarify this concept, a single triangle has an angle closure condition while a trilateral of the same shape
has no way of being checked; a quadrilateral with two diagonals and all its directions measured, as stated
in 2.2.2, has four closure conditions whilst the same trilateration geometrical figure with its 6 sides
measured has only one verification. This advantage with triangulation is limited since the method requires
some sides being measured (baseline); however, trilateration can be conducted without observing any
angles.
A combination of both techniques resulted in a suitable solution, although sometimes termed

triangulateration, here it will be termed traverse, although often a traverse may be a simple succession of
measured angles and distances.
One of the most important properties of traverses is that error propagation is independent from
configuration; that is there is no requirement for complex network design involving suitable geometries or
erecting towers to facilitate certain lines of sight. From the practical point of view with this kind of
network, uniformity of control points with survey stations or aid to navigation requirements was possible.
In general, it is advisable to maintain a reasonable balance between the accuracies of both types of
measurements (directions and distances) in order to improve the geometry independence in relation to the
accuracy of results. One of the applicable rules is
σDIST σANG
=
DIST 200000
where σDIST is the distance standard deviation stated in the same unit as DIST, and σANG is the
standard deviation of a measured direction stated in sexagesimal seconds. Then, for σANG = ± 1" the
distances required are 5 ppm (1/200000) and for ± 4", 25 ppm (1/40000) is enough.
The required angular or distance errors must never be confused with the instrument reading or resolution
capabilities. The observer limitations, the environmental conditions, the correction accuracies, the time
when measurement were made, etc., must also be considered.
M-13
312
For example, for an inclined distance measurement with an angle of elevation of 20º and 5 km in length,
with an elevation difference error of ± 0.5 m, the error in its horizontal projection is expected to be
0.5 m tan 20° = 0.18 m
Thus, in spite of being measured with EODM equipment, whose error may be in the order of ± 1 cm ± 2
ppm, and with the inclined distance error of ± 2 cm, if used for transferring a horizontal position, the error
is ± 18 cm.
A distance measured with EDM equipment must be corrected for environmental conditions (pressure,
temperature, humidity).
Humidity is calculated according to pressure and temperature with dry and wet bulb observations, it is
very important for measurements taken by microwaves. No measurement should be taken with EDM in
an oversaturated atmosphere (rain, drizzle, fog); with EODM measurements humidity is not so important,
although the luminous wavelength used should be considered. LASER radiations have an advantage
since they are basically monochromatic, it is generally sufficient to obtain pressure and temperature data.
For long distances (more than 5 km) it is recommended that the environmental parameters at both ends of
the distances to be measured are obtained and then averaged.
Manufacturers usually provide the instructions for making the necessary corrections to their equipment.
In EODM, the reflector prisms should be used with the equipment with which a calibration was
conducted to avoid errors in measured distances, sometimes above 1 cm.
In distances above 5 km corrections for earth and ray curvature must be made. Such correction is:
+
(1 − k )2 D3
24 R ²
Where k is the refraction coefficient (rate between earth and ray radius). In mean conditions it is 0.25 for
microwaves and 0.13 for luminous waves. It is sufficient to introduce its approximate mean value as
earth radius.
R = 6371000m
Figure 6.5 illustrates D (measured distance) and S (reduced distance to reference surface) meanings. This
is necessary for the above correction and the correction for point elevations, which is detailed below.
M-13
313
Fig. 6.5
It is important to note that the above correction for curvatures takes into account the geometric effect of
both arcs as well as the physical influence produced as a consequence of ray propagation at a slightly
lower level than that for mean environmental conditions at both ends.
Correction for ray elevation and inclination is more significant. The general expression is:
D ² − ( H 2 − H1 ) 2
S=
H H
(1 + 1 )(1 + 2 )
R R
The way in which such elevations are obtained, especially their difference ΔH = (H2 - H1), affect the
correction error. By simply considering the numerator:
S ≈ D ² − ΔH ²
we can deduce the influence:
Δh
dS ≈ dΔh = idΔH
D ² − ΔH ²
previously mentioned. Therefore, the elevation difference error must be multiplied by the slope,
i = tan α, in order to obtain the influence produced on the corrected distance error.
M-13
314
In topographic surveys it is usual to make calculations in plane co-ordinates; for this purpose it is
necessary to have previously applied corrections to the projection plane. The way in which this type of
corrections may be calculated is detailed in 2.2.5.
The general and most correct way of calculating a traverse network on the representation plane is via a
previous calculation of the co-ordinates for every new point commencing with the values of the known
points and the uncorrected observations. It is necessary to average some results taken from different
points starting with the additional redundant observations. When the provisional co-ordinates have been
accepted, the above corrections should be applied and then observation equations are to be obtained, the
unknown quantities of which are the corrections to the co-ordinates, in order to conduct a least squares
adjustment.
If any observation exceeds tolerance levels (maximum admissible error) the original records should be
checked, if no apparent cause is found regarding the error source re-measurement should be considered.
If there is sufficient redundancy, the erroneous observation may be removed and a new adjustment
conducted.
In some basic traverse circuits an approximate adjustment may be achieved by distributing the angle
closure error first and then the co-ordinate closure error proportional to side length or some other logical
criteria.
Angle closure errors in traverses must be below:
(
± 5"+2" n )
where n is the number of angular stations making up the circuit. In secondary traverses, intended to
increase the density of the control points, the error may extend to:
± (10"+10" n )
When the purpose is limited to fixing co-ordinates of coastal details, larger tolerances may be permitted.
Co-ordinates closure errors should be no more than the values stated in Table 1 depending on the use of
the network, noting that adjusted co-ordinates for intermediate points will have errors in the order of half
the closure error. Nevertheless, for control networks, closure errors should not be greater then ±(0.2 m +
10 ppm) for primary horizontal control and ±(0.5 m + 100ppm) for secondary stations to meet the
requirements in 2.1.2.
When errors are greater than a traverse tolerance, there are methods available to assist in locating the error
source. For example, when an angle closure error is detected the grid bearing of the suspect side is
calculated from all components of the co-ordinate closure error. However, if there is a large angle error,
the angles should not be adjusted, on calculating the traverse in both directions, only at the affected point
will the co-ordinate values roughly match.
When a network is accurately adjusted by least squares from provisional co-ordinates, the process
enables, from the variance-covariance matrix, the calculation of adjusted co-ordinate errors. A similar
calculation in a traverse may not be so clear since co-ordinate closure errors are more general. In such
cases, the mid points may be permitted to have an error in the order of half the closure error, decreasing
towards each end.
M-13
315
Traverse calculations in plane co-ordinates are very simple. The initial grid bearing is obtained from
increases in ΔE, ΔN. Two control points whose co-ordinates are known in advance are represented as P
and Q in Fig. 6. Then:
EQ − EP ΔEPQ
tg BPQ = =
NQ − N P ΔN PQ
where Δ EPQ and Δ NPQ signs (+/-) also define the quadrant.
If true azimuth referred to true north, rather than grid north as the referred available orientation, with grid
declination γ (the definition of which is given in Annex A), this be should be taken into account. From
this point forward only plane orientations (grid bearing) will be considered. Moreover, if a Transverse
Mercator projection is used, it is assumed that corrections to observations (distances and directions) for
the plane of representation have been made according to specifications in 2.2.5.
Fig. 6.6
Returning to computing a traverse, the grid azimuth of the first side is obtained by simply adding the first
angle:
BP1 = BPQ + α 0
B12 = BPQ + α1 ± 180°
And using the following general form of bearing transfer:

The sign + is used in case the previous addition (BP1 + α1) is below 180º and the sign - when it is above.
The latter is the most common case.
M-13
316
Increases in co-ordinates are obtained with the expressions for converting polar co-ordinates into plane
co-ordinates:
ΔN = S cos B
ΔE = S sin B
It should be remembered that, in the cases of simple traverses, before making such conversions, it is
normal to adjust an angle by distributing the closure error if it is below the given tolerance level. In more
complex traverses, network calculations may be supplemented with the algorithms related to intersections
or resections according to descriptions in 2.2.4 and 2.2.5. Adjustment requirements mentioned above
should also be considered.
As regards adjustments, their respective methods will not be developed further, since such processes are
expected to be developed at the NHO where appropriate software is available. It should be remembered,
however, that good results may be achieved only if the data is checked in the field to ensure that closure
errors or the calculation of point co-ordinates carried out by different methods show an acceptable
consistency with the above specifications.
A simple traverse is deemed to be fully closed if it starts from a pair of control points and ends at another
pair. There are then three possible closure errors available: one angle closure error and two co-ordinates
closure errors. This case is illustrated at the top of Fig. 6.7; it allows an initial angular adjustment and a
subsequent distribution of the differences in co-ordinates. There is a special case of a simple closed
traverse which makes a circuit, starting and ending at the same point. Even though it may be properly
checked as detailed above, it is not advisable to conduct such methods for the reasons set out in 2.1.5
A simple traverse is termed half closed when a direction to another control point has not been measured
from the final point; this means that no known angle checking or its corresponding adjustment is
permissible. Nevertheless, if co-ordinate closure errors are acceptable, a similar distribution as in the
previous case may be carried out as illustrated in the second case of Fig. 6.7.
A simple traverse is deemed to be precariously closed when, although it starts and ends at control points,
there is no final measured direction with an orientation. The only check is to confirm that the measured
distance between the control points P and R generated from the traverse is fairly consistent with the
distance calculated from their known co-ordinates; this illustrated in the third case in Fig. 6.7. The
simplest way of calculating the distance is by giving it an arbitrary or approximate orientation for the
initial calculation and by then rotating the orientation and adjusting the length according to the differences
to the end point.
M-13
317
Fig. 6.7
A simple traverse is deemed to be an open, not closed, or hanging traverse only if it starts from known
points but ends at new unknown marks, thus no closure verification or adjustment can be made; this is not
a recommended configuration. When it is the only choice, extreme caution should be exercised and the
temporary nature of subsequent results should be clearly stated.
Traverses are closely associated with trigonometric levelling operations. These consist of a series of
measurements taken to determine differences in elevations by vertical angles. (See 4.2 at Chapter 2)
The most precise way of obtaining a trigonometric difference of elevation consists in measuring the direct
distance between the points and the vertical angles reciprocally and simultaneously from both stations:
i1 + s1 i2 + s 2 ⎛ α −α 2 ⎞
ΔH 12 = − + D sin ⎜ 1 ⎟
2 2 ⎝ 2 ⎠
M-13
318
where (see Fig. 6.8):
i1 = theodolite height above bench mark in point 1;

s1 = signal (target) height above bench mark in point 1;
i2, s2 = theodolite and signal heights above bench mark in point 2;
D = slant and elevated distance (see Fig. 6.5);
ΔH12 = difference of elevations between benchmarks 1 and 2.
The elevation angles (α) are positive when they are above the horizon and they are negative when below
the horizon. In Fig. 6.8 α1 is the positive angle and α2 is the negative angle. It is necessary for both to be
simultaneously measured in order for a correct adjustment of ray curvature, which changes throughout the
day.
A trigonometric difference of elevation obtained under these conditions may have an error of
± 0.01 m · K
where K is the distance expressed in kilometres, which is an error of 1 cm/Km.
If slant distance (D) has not been measured and ground distance reduced to the reference level, commonly
the mean sea level, is available, which is the case of triangulation or intersection (see Fig. 5), the formula
to be applied is:
i1 + s1 i2 + s2 ⎛ Hm ⎞ ⎛ α1 − α 2 ⎞
ΔH12 = − + S ⎜1 + ⎟ tg⎜ ⎟
2 2 ⎝ R ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
Fig. 6.8
M-13
319
If the elevation angle is known only at point 1, the formulae to be applied are:
(1 − k )
ΔH 12 = i1 − s2 + D sin α 1 + D²
2R
⎛ Hm ⎞ (1 − k ) S ²
ΔH 12 = i1 − s2 + S ⎜1 + ⎟tgα 1 +
⎝ R ⎠ 2R
In the last three formulae, R is the terrestrial mean radius, in principle 6371 Km, but a more correct value
relative to latitude and azimuth may be used for the adopted spheroid. The same is valid for the formula
above to transfer D to S (See Fig.6.5)
D ² − ΔH ²
S=
⎛ H1 ⎞⎛ H 2 ⎞
⎜1 + ⎟⎜1 + ⎟
⎝ R ⎠⎝ R ⎠
H1 + H 2
Hm =
2
Hm is the mean elevation
If only H1 is available, it may be calculated as:
ΔH12
H m = H1 +
2
Where ΔH12 is obtained by an iterative process which improves the value H2.
Coefficient k has the above stated meaning and it can be considered to have a value of:
k = 0.13 ± 0.05
then the error of a non-reciprocal trigonometric difference of elevation may be:
± (0.01 m K + 0.004 m K²)
The use of trigonometric levelling is ideal both for reducing the sides due to differences of elevations and
height and for other altimetric requirements to overcome possible accuracies.
2.2.4 Intersection and Resection
The most general form of intersection is when directions are observed from two control points into a
mark, whose co-ordinates are required. Directions in orientation mean that directions are measured from
the same stations to other known points, it then being possible to obtain the grid bearings of both
directions. In some very special cases these are astronomic or gyroscopic orientations; in such cases it is
required to go from the true azimuth to the grid bearing by applying the grid declination shown as γ in
Fig. 6.6.
M-13
320
Fig. 6.9
Fig. 6.9 shows a typical intersection example. It should be made clear that in some cases, especially in
short distances, reciprocal directions between known points (P1 - P2; P2 - P1) are used as the origin of
plane orientations (B1; B2) to the point intended to be determined (P).
Besides grid bearing errors arising mainly from angular errors, distances (P1 - P ; P2 - P) and the angle
between these directions, which is equal to the difference (B1 - B2), contribute to the errors in the co-
ordinates of P. The simplest rule is that the angle should range between 30º and 150º. The area for this
condition is shaded in Fig. 6.9 and corresponds to the limits of two circles centred at O and O' which are
obtained as the vertices of two equilateral triangles with a common side P1P2.
Outside this area, errors largely increase to reach indetermination for B1 - B2 when equal to O° or 180°.
Another intersection case is shown when distances are measured from P1 and P2 to the point to be
determined (P). These distances (S1; S2) define two symmetrical solutions as regards axis P1 - P2. To
solve this ambiguity it must be known if P is on the left side of P1 to P2 (this is the case in the figure), or
on the right side (a symmetrical case). An alternative solution is to note, when seen from P, which is the
known point on the right or on the left (in the case of Figure 6.9, P1, is on the right and P2 on the left).
Algorithms to make corrections to the plane and obtain the co-ordinates of P, taking into account the
cases stated, are shown in 2.2.5.
M-13
321
In cases of intersection, directions (straight lines) or distances (arcs), the best solutions are obtained when
the crossing angle (B1 - B2) tends to 90°. In these cases the error ellipse tends to be a circle. Strictly
speaking, taking into account that errors in measured directions and distances increase their influence
with distance and such ideal solutions slightly differ from the 90º rule, its use, however, is a good way to
quickly examining the suitability of the set up.
The most common resection case is when three known control points are observed from a new point, as in
Fig. 6.10. This case is usually known as Pothenot-Snellius resection.
In this case, indetermination occurs when the circumference of a circle passes through the three known
points. The same angles (α, β) to the control points can be measured to any point located on that line. It
is relatively easy to avoid this situation by plotting on a chart the known control points and seeing if they
lie on a circle centred on the unknown point. Another method is to check the addition:
α+β+ω
If it is near 180° such situation must be avoided.
The algorithm to solve this case, including corrections to compute on the projection plane, is shown in
2.2.5.
Resections have been very frequently used by hydrographers, both in topographic surveying by theodolite
and hydrographic surveying by sextant. The advantage being that it was only necessary to put signals on
the control points, the surveyor then being free to carry out his tasks without the assistance from ashore.
Fig. 6.10
M-13
322
It is possible to present multiple resections as generally given in Fig. 6.11.
Fig. 6.11
That is from new points P, P', P", P''', ... directions to known points P1, P2 ... P6 are seen. In such cases it
should be noted that in the first and last points, two known control points are seen; at the intermediate
points, besides reciprocal directions, a sight to one of those known points is sufficient.
Where there are only 2 new points and 4 control points are seen, it is known as Marek solution. If only
the two control points seen from two new points are used, it is called Hansen solution. These particular
cases are illustrated in Fig. 6.12.
Fig. 6.12
Even though these multiple resection cases may be used whenever required, they are not recommended
due to their limited opportunities for checking. A simple solution to apply is by incorporating additional
sights to provide redundancy and the opportunity to check.
M-13
323
Therefore more than three directions to known points should be seen from every new point, or that new
points will be interconnected by reciprocal lines of sight, as shown in Fig. 6.13; even though every new
point is determined by directions to three known points, reciprocal lines of sight between new points
include them in calculations of adjacent points.
Fig. 6.13
Configurations originally close to indetermination can be improved in this way.
Solutions of this kind require some type of adjustment, whether rigorously by least squares or by iterative
average of several positive solutions by trying to give more strength to cases further away from the
situation of indetermination.
2.2.5 Usual Algorithms
a) Corrections to projection plane (See ANNEX A)
One of the processes to be conducted for calculations with rectilinear figures on the
representation plane to be correct is related to the corrections that must be applied to
measured observations (distances and directions). In this section we shall deal with the Gauss
Krüger projection, also known as Transverse Mercator, which is often used for topographic
calculations.
ANNEX A deals with the nature of this projection for cases of "tangent cylinder", that is
those in which distance deformation starts on the central meridian:
ds ' x²
m= = 1+ + ...
ds 2R²
where x is the east co-ordinate referred to the central meridian:
x = E - X0
when a false easting value X0 is used.
M-13
324
If this coefficient is applied between two points 1 and 2 (not infinitely near) a relationship:
S' x 2 + x1 x2 + x22
= 1+ 1
S 6R²
is obtained. It should be noted that if a point is on one side of the central meridian and the
other point on the other side, the product x1 · x2 will be negative.
Also that R (mean terrestrial radius) must be calculated for mean latitude of the working area
and the representation system includes a coefficient (K) in order to contract distances over the
central meridian, as in the case of UTM representation (where K = 0.9996, see ANNEX A).
The coefficient for reducing distances (to obtain the plane value by multiplying it by the
geodetic value over the spheroid) must be affected by the same value:
or
S' ⎛ x 2 + x1 x2 + x22 ⎞
= K ⎜⎜1 + 1 ⎟⎟
S ⎝ 6R² ⎠
⎛ x 2 + x1 x2 + x22 ⎞
S ' = K ⎜⎜1 + 1 ⎟⎟ S
⎝ 6R² ⎠
Measured directions also require the application of a correction. This need arises from the
fact that geodetic lines (on the spheroid) on being transferred to the plane, are represented by
a slight concavity towards the central meridian.
Fig. 6.14
M-13
325
Fig. 6.14 shows such curvature and the corrections which should be applied to pass from the
arc, corresponding to the geodetic line, to the cord, corresponding to the side of a rectilinear
figure on the plane. On accepting the correction sign to pass from the arc to the cord, we may
see that:
ρ"
(δ 2 − δ1 ) = ( x1 + x2 )( N 2 − N1 )
2R²
since absolute value addition for such corrections must be equivalent to the quadrilateral
spherical excess the surface of which is 1/2 (x1 + x2) (N2 - N1) and ρ" is the typical constant
to pass from radians to sexagesimal seconds (ρ" = 206265").
As arc curvature increases with x values, naturally the x of the known station point carries
more weight than that of the observed point. Then:
ρ"
δ1 = (2 x1 + x2 )( N1 − N 2 )
6R²
ρ"
δ2 = (2 x2 + x1 )( N 2 − N1 )
6R²
and the difference between them leads to the first expression (δ2 - δ1).
In general terms, if there is a need to reduce a series of directions to points Pi measured from
a point Po, the corrections (along with their sign) are:
ρ"
δi = (2 x0 + xi )( N0 − Ni )
6R²
It should be noted that westward of the central meridian x values are negative; thus the
correction sign generating a change in concavity is automatically modified. On the
assumption that the direction between the known station and the observed point are on
different sides of the meridian, the change in the x sign will decrease the δ value. This is
logical since the geodetic line will have a curvature inversion in order to keep above
concavity.
For calculations of corrections for both distances and directions, it is normal to make a
preliminary calculation of the mark’s co-ordinates and ignore any deformations. Corrections
are estimated using these provisional co-ordinates and then the final calculation is undertaken.
In some cases provisional co-ordinates are used for adjustment; however this will not be dealt
with further.
M-13
326
b) Intersection of Directions.
Fig. 6.15
Figure 6.15 shows an intersection of two directions, of which the grid bearings B1 and B2, are
known. It may be the case that they have been obtained from line of sight observations 1 – 2
and 2 - 1.
There are several solutions and software to solve this problem. One of them is:
N = N1 +
[(N1 − N 2 )sin B2 − ( E1 − E2 ) cos B2 ] cos B
sin (B1 − B2 )
1
E = E1 +
[(N1 − N 2 )sin B2 − (E1 − E2 )cos B2 ] sin B
sin (B1 − B2 )
1
M-13
327
c) Intersection of Distances
Fig. 6.16
This case is illustrated in Fig. 16, it has two mathematical solutions; therefore it is important
to make it clear whether point P is on the left (this is the case in the figure), or on the right of
line 1-2.
One solution is by applying the following calculations:
S12 = + (N 2 − N1 )2 + (E2 − E1 )2
E 2 − E1
sin B12 =
S12
N 2 − N1
cos B12 =
S12
1⎛ ⎞
S 2 − S 12
a= ⎜ S 12 − 2 ⎟
2 ⎜⎝ S 12⎟
⎠
1⎛ S − S1 ⎞
2 2
b = ⎜⎜ S 12 + 2 ⎟
2⎝ S 12 ⎟⎠
h = + S 12 − a = S 12 − b ²
N = N 1 + a cos B12 m h sin B12
E = E1 + a sin B12 ± h cos B12
M-13
328
The lower sign is for the case when P is on the left of 1-2 and the upper sign is when it is on
the right.
d) Resection
As stated in 2.2.4 above a resection occurs when directions or angles are measured:
from a point, the calculation of which is required, to three known control points. This
situation, as well as nomenclature to be applied in the algorithm, is shown in Fig. 6.17.
Before proceeding, it should be noted that there are many graphical, numerical and
mechanical solutions with which to obtain the station point position.
Fig. 6.17
With such numerical solutions it is essential that a method is available to detect cases close to
indetermination as indicated in Fig.6.10.
Fig. 6.18
M-13
329
The use of two auxiliary points 1 and 2 constitute the base for the algorithm, proposed below,
is shown in Fig. 6.18.
The formulae to calculate the co-ordinates for these points can be obtained simply from:
When points 1 and 2 are too close to each other (for example less than a tenth of distances
N1 = N A − (E0 − E A )cot gα
E1 = E A + ( N 0 − N A )cot gα
N 2 = N B − (EB − E0 )cot gβ
E2 = EB + ( N B − N 0 ) cot gβ
AO or OB) it can be assumed that the network is close to indetermination.
Calculation for N and E co-ordinates of point P can be achieved by:
N = N 1 + 10 . cos .(12 − 10 ). cos .12

E = E 1 + 10 . cos .(12 − 10 ). sin .12
M-13
330
2.2.6 Levelling and its Errors
Trigonometric levelling and the possible errors have been discussed in 2.2.3 (traverse). It should be noted
that in the case of intersections a similar operation can be undertaken with the algorithms and the resultant
calculations. It is also be possible to apply them for surveys using polar co-ordinates or EODM
tachymetry, when it is particularly useful to have total stations which store (horizontal and vertical )
ranges and directions to surveyed points. On processing such information and when ranges over 100 m
are used, it is important to verify that the software application includes corrections for refraction and earth
curvatures.
Direct levelling (with spirit or self aligning levels) is generally more precise. In the case of geodetic
levelling, which requires the use of levels of higher sensitivity and stadia graduated on INVAR plates (an
alloy of nickel and steel with a coefficient of expansion below 1 x 10-6 1/°C) and other precautionary
measures, error propagation may be below:
1 mm K
where K is the track distance expressed in Km.
If common topographic levels, wooden or plastic centimetre-graduated stadia with joints or couplings and
instrument-stadia distances below 100 m, with equidistant stations (within 3 m), are used, you may attain
accuracies of the order of:
7 mm K
for which it is assumed that every section between bench marks is measured in both directions with a
tolerance of the order of:
± 3mm K (geodetic) and ± 10mm k (topographic)
for both cases, without bias to any intermediate or even less accurate solution which may be adopted.
In hydrographic surveying, the highest accuracies are required to tie-in permanent tide stations followed
by temporary tide stations, which are generally established during the survey, the calculation of levels for
harbour facilities and standards for engineering works associated with water behaviour.
In an extensive hydrographic survey (more than 50 km) with no available local levelling datums, it is
expedient to provide, as a minimum, a direct levelling line to which the tide stations can be related and
leave a reference mark from which future trigonometric levelling can be conducted. When applying these
provisions, the specifications in 2.1.6 should be considered and an analysis of the stability of the
relationship of the tide station and mean sea levels is necessary.
When using satellite methods (GNSS) for altimetric purposes, the provisions in 2.1.6 and Chapter 2 need
to be noted particularly the requirement for modelling corrections to pass from heights above the spheroid
to values associated with sea level used in hydrographic surveys. Regardless of preset correction
diagrams that may exist, it is necessary to adjust them to altimetric points as described in 2.2.1, including
the provisions in Fig. 1, in connection with the relationship between altimetric marks. In other words,
use of GNSS techniques for altimetric purposes should be limited to point interpolation rather than
extrapolation. This concept is likely to evolve in the future but in 2004 there remains no likelihood of
M-13
331
confidence in general correction models and still less in places where there is no guarantee that local
observations have been carried out to create them.
2.3 Coastal and Harbour Ground Surveys
2.3.1 Application of Direct Topographic Methods
In general, coastal surveys which are a part of hydrographic surveys are mostly carried out by
photogrammetry or other remote-sensing processes. In such cases the surveyor’s main task, when
processing information, consists of obtaining a proper interpretation of coastal features, that coastline
delimitation poses no difficulty and that data on the ground control points are adequately provided. He
must also ensure that aids to navigation signals and stations have their horizontal and vertical positions
properly determined.
However, there are cases in which all this information must be obtained by direct topographic survey
methods, i.e. by field observations and measurements. These cases are generally related to the need to
represent certain areas on large scales (1:5000, 1:2000, 1:1000 ...). This often occurs in areas where there
is a port infrastructure or where a harbour project, landing, water intake or other engineering works are
being carried out or extended to occupy the inter-tidal zone and extending into the near shore strip.
The limited extent of such places as well as the required high degree of detail may require that such
surveys are carried out by topographic measurements in the field.
2.3.2 Density of points to be surveyed
Firstly the required degree of detail must be established. The usual method is to set a scale according to
the essential representational needs of the final product, in order to properly obtain the shape it may be
necessary to survey a point every square centimetre. Nevertheless such a distribution shall not necessarily
be strictly homogeneous. Priority should be given to sites where there is a significant change in slope or
where there are outstanding characteristics: hillocks, holes, saddles, ridges, talwegs, etc.
Generally the survey of points on near-perpendicular lines to the shoreline provides much more useful
information for good representation of shape than any other type of distribution.
For details which must be surveyed to allow representation of natural or artificial features, more or less
independently of relief, the quantity of points should be adequate enough to be able to plot them at the
intended scale, straight sections probably only require the surveying of turning points and if orthogonal,
simplification may be greater still.
2.3.3 Applicable Methods
Satellite techniques (GNSS) are ideal for surveying horizontal positions. If they are intended to be
extended to planimetric and altimetric positions, the provisions detailed in 2.2.1 should be observed.
Generally the process is more advantageous when the density of the points to be surveyed is low (i.e.
more than 50 or 100 m between them for scales of 1:5000, 1:10000, etc.). Ground-permitting, this
process may be achieved by placing the rover station in a vehicle. The opportunity of processing
information in a fully automated manner would rapidly improve the achievement of results.
EODM tachymetry is a particularly appropriate method for cases where, from a few stations, points with
distances of 1000 m and above may be surveyed. Use of total stations with its capacity to store distances,
directions (horizontal and vertical), attributes of surveyed points, etc., makes it possible to quickly
M-13
332
process the information and generate the appropriate survey sheets which can be completed with
additional data if required.
Stadia method tachymetry is ideally suitable for sites where the survey of a large number of points very
close to each other (50, 20, 10 m) is required at relatively short distances (below 200 m) from every
station. Reading of graticule lines is made on generally centimetre-graduated stadia.
Ground distance is obtained as K.m, where K is the stadia constant, usually 100, and "m" is the
difference of stadia line readings. If an elevation angle α has been measured, the horizontal equipment
ground distance to the stadia is:
K • m cos ²α
and the relative elevation to the surveyed point equals:
1
ΔH 12 = i1 − S 2 + K ⋅ m ⋅ sin 2α 1
2
where i1, S2, y and α1 have the meanings given in 2.2.3 for trigonometric levelling.
In the case of lines with too great an incline of sight (α > 10°), this method is not recommended for height
transfer since the distance error (of the order 0.2%) and the sight’s probable lack of verticality introduce
considerable altimetric errors (this is less frequent in EODM tachymetry).
With special stadia having divisions of 5 cm or 10 cm, the survey ranges may extend to 500 m and above,
although it is not advisable in the case of lines with too great an incline of sight for the above reasons.
All these procedures allow calculation, from the above formulae, of the 3 horizontal and vertical co-
ordinates of the mark. In some cases these co-ordinates and orientations may be obtained by resection
complemented with inverse trigonometric levelling, based on the adequacy of the formulae given in 2.2.3
In flat areas direct levelling is a simple and precise method of surveying. If necessary stadimetric
distances (K.m) may also be used as well as horizontal directions which may be measured by some other
instruments.
In relatively flat locations, for constructions with some orthogonal shapes measurement of perpendicular
distances may be made using tapes and an optical square. Simple though it may be, it proves to be a
useful method to be applied in some places such as docks, piers, moorings and other port buildings. This
type of survey is usually be complemented with direct levelling in order to determine platform or floor
elevations.
2.3.4 Relief Representation
Although the trend is to generate databases which provide a variety of applications for information
through a Geographic Information System (GIS), implying the availability of a Digital Terrain Model
(DTM), planimetric and altimetric measurements are frequently requested to be represented by contour
lines. For this purpose, selection of a contour interval should be made at not less than four times the
estimated error of elevations.
M-13
333
An alternative method of selecting the contour interval is by scales. In the case of very broken ground,
the scale denominator thousandth part may be measured in metres (example: 5 m for 1:5000), but in the
case of flat and featureless terrain, the values may decrease to a tenth part (0.5 m in the former example).
Both criteria should be harmonised and basically, the survey purpose as well as relief fluctuation in the
area should be taken into account.
Several software packages are available for drawing contour lines from discreetly surveyed points. Some
of them have proved to be very capable but it is expedient to adjust their drawing algorithms by
incorporating some interpretation rules for the relief before the final version.
Fig. 6.19 shows how drainage lines tend to stress the contour line curvature while ridges tending to
separate the water movement on the surface are gentler. These trends generally undergo changes and
contours collectively representing the relief must keep some agreement.
The concepts mentioned above are valid for application in ground shape; however, not all of them are
valid for seafloor application.
Fig. 6.19
With some geomorphological knowledge, the criteria may be generally improved for a better relief
interpretation.
3. REMOTE SENSING
Some techniques for obtaining information through remote sensors, which capture the ground radiation,
will be described in this section. This information is stored and then processed, thus generating products
that provide topographic data.
If ground radiations originate from the reflected solar energy, sensors are called passive; if they are
generated from reflected emission of devices associated with the sensor, sensors are called active.
The range of frequencies and wavelengths of electromagnetic waves for remote sensing is shown in Table
6.4:
M-13
334
Table 6.4
NAME FREQUENCY (Hz) WAVELENGHT (m)

Microwaves 3 x 109 to 3 x 1011 10-1 to 10-3
Thermal Infrared 3 x 1013 to 3 x 10 12 10-5 to 10-4
Medium and near infrared 4,3 x 1014 to 3 x 1013 0.7 x 10-6 to 10-5
... ...
4.6 x 10 14 Red 0.65 x 10-6
.... ....
Visible Light
14
5.4 x 10 Green 0.55 x 10 –6
.... ....
6.6 x 1014 Blue 0.45 x 10-6
... ...
Ultra Violet 3 x 1015 to 3 x 1016 10-7 a 10-8
Radio waves have the lowest frequency whilst x, gamma and cosmic rays have the highest. They also
have other applications.
Among the passive sensors uses, which use visible light radiations and their close proximities, is the
Photogrammetry. Since this technique began to be applied with light sensitive films, it has been used in
hydrographic surveying since the beginning of the 20th century, it remains one of the most efficient ways
of obtaining good information of the relief, especially for large scales (1:20000, 1:10000, 1:5000, ...)
From the 1970s and more intensively from the 1990s, remote sensing applications were extended from
active and passive airborne and satellites sensors to other imagery processes. Satellite methods have not
generally the same capacity as photogrammetry in the ground shape interpretation. However, they have
additional capabilities for detecting the surface properties of soil and water covered areas. They also offer
impressive updating capabilities, frequently at relatively low costs.
In photogrammetry, as well in other imagery processes, it is necessary to undertake ground control

operations in order to achieve correct scale results and obtain good referenced positions. Ground control
consists of locating, in the field, identifiable points based on the information provided by the sensors.
3.1 Photogrammetry (See 3.4 at Chapter 2)
Strictly speaking, photogrammetry is the technique that allows objects to be described in three dimensions
from overlapped photographic images, taken from adjacent places. For hydrographic surveys, aerial
photography with vertical axis through a metric camera is more useful.
3D description is achieved by stereoscopic viewing of virtual models and the measurements are taken
with the use of specific instruments to achieve topographic representation. Of course, this technique
requires ground control points obtained via field topographic methods or densification through an aerial
photogrammetric process, also called aerotriangulation.
There are other products which are not 3D but may be considered to be part of photogrammetry. Among
these are photo-plots, which can be obtained by simple assembling photographic images adjusted by
rectification (scale and inclination).
M-13
335
3.1.1 Principles and applications of aerial photographs
The objective of aerial photographs is to provide information to obtain true ground representation
including relief. This can be done through photogrammetric restitution or stereo compilation.
Nevertheless, as previously stated in the concept of photogrammetry, there are other 2 D products which
can be obtained from aerial photographs.
Fig. 6.20
To explain this it is necessary to take into account the basic expression for the aerial photograph scale:
A' B' f
S= =
AB H
Where the ratio among the focal length f and the flight altitude H is directly related to the image scale
(see Fig. 6.20 for a camera with vertical axis).
Although objective lenses might be considered as a centred optical system with two nodes, the scheme is
simplified with only one optical centre similar to a thin lens. That simplification is enough for the
approximate calculation of the flight scale. See also that, as H>>f, it is assumed that the image is formed
in the focal plane.
A change in the flight height causes a change in scale; a lack of verticality in the camera axis produces a
change in the scale in different points of the camera. For example, a rectangle ABCD on the ground can
be represented as a trapezium A´BĆ´D´ on the photographic image where the scale of segments A´B´ is
shorter than in C´D´ (See Fig.6.21).
M-13
336
Fig. 6.21
Moreover, if there are features in the relief with significant vertical characteristics, the scale introduces
other changes on each photograph. This can only be resolved by a 3D treatment like restitution. An
adjustment of the change in the flight height and the axis orientation is possible by rectification through a
2D photographic process. Note that this adjustment is only possible on flat surfaces.
Special devices can fulfil the process of rectification mentioned above by using rectifiers provided with a
camera, which project the image onto a board. The set allows a series of combined movements which
enables the projected image to change and to include slopes according to focusing conditions. The
current way to rectify is by making the projection of four well-distributed points coincide with their well-
marked locations, as in Fig. 6.21. There are also equivalent 2D numerical procedures for solving this
problem.
Fig. 6.22
The limits for these processes rest with the image of a point with a certain difference in elevation relative
to the surrounding area, which experiences a perspective offset on the image (see Fig 6.22). Note that,
apart from the difference in elevation ∆H (Delta H), the distance of the elevated point from the camera
vertical axis increases the offset, in other words, points near the vertical axis of the camera do not display
significant offset effects.
An alternative way to generate photographic images free from this effect is to combine the photographic
process with the 3D treatment, the product is called orthophotograph.
M-13
337
The best way to present ground photographic images is through an orthophotomosaic, which is an
assembly of images forming a uniform-scale mosaic. The next in quality is the rectified mosaic adjusted
as mentioned; the coarsest method is by assembling raw photographic images and accepting an
approximate scale as a function of the average flight height.
The type of photo-plot should always be specified so that caution can be exercised with respect to the
validity of the product metric.
3.1.2 Aerial photograph acquisition elements
Extraterrestrial solar radiation has a maximum range of wavelengths from 0.4 micrometers to 0.8
micrometers (1 micrometer= 10-6m), which is between infrared and blue (see Table 6.4). The radiation
changes when passing through the atmosphere, the soil reflection also impacts on the light spectrum
received by the camera. Thus, the film and the emulsion must be carefully selected.
Among the black and white films (scale or tints of greys) orthochromatic emulsions are especially useful
between 0.4 and 0.55 micrometers, panchromatic ones between 0.3 and 0.65 micrometers, with an
additional increase in wavelengths of 0.6 and 0.9 micrometers. The most useful in aerial photogrammetry
is the panchromatic emulsion. There are several types of three layer colour films, but they are more
useful for photo interpretation, described later (3.1.8), than for photogrammetry.
There are a series of specifications regarding density, speed, resolving power, granularity and base
stability which must be determined in order to achieve the best result in the prevailing conditions to meet
the needs for the final product. The objective and filters to be used should be addressed in the analysis.
The objective lens is composed of an optical system where a good distortion correction is particularly
required.
The image format commonly used is 23 cm x 23 cm with the focal distances (f) (see 3.1.1) detailed in
Table 6.5:
Table 6.5
Camera Type f (mm)

Super Wide Angle 85
Wide Angle 153
Intermediate angle 210
Normal Angle 305
Narrow Angle 610
Cameras with a shorter focal distance (f) require a better distortion rectification whilst the images are also
more affected by atmospheric refraction. The Wide Angle is the most commonly used type of camera.
For photogrammetric purposes, an aerial camera must have a good determination of f, a rigorous
correction of the distortion or other optical and mechanical conditions which can be checked by
calibration. The camera is termed a metric camera if these conditions have been met. These cameras
have an accurate system for ensuring verticality of the axis and assure the flatness of the film. They also
have a proper dwell time control and allow an overlapping control between consecutive photographs (end
lap), etc.
M-13
338
Although digital cameras generally enable high quality images for photographs, their development for use
in photogrammetry is advancing rapidly but presently (2004) only non metric cameras are available.
An important component for aerial photography is the aerial survey platform. Criteria include suitable
space for the camera and its attachments, have sufficient endurance, are able to operate at the required
flight heights and required speeds, satisfy permissible vibration limits, etc.
Among other requirements it must have GNSS positioning, often with a differential capacity, a
requirement for positioning synchronisation with the camera and multiple antennas for platform
inclination checking.
3.1.3 Flight planning
Initially it is necessary to define the flight scale, meaning the scale of the camera, which, as it was stated
in 3.1.2, has a format of 23cmx23cm. If the type of camera is defined, the scale also determines the flight
height H=f/S (see 3.1.1 Fig. 6.20).
Although the scale may be enlarged five times to obtain good photogrammetric products to meet the
hydrographic requirements, the analysis of the required altimetry accuracy should be conducted. It should
be noted that the deviation of the elevation obtained by restitution reaches 200ppmxH (200 parts per
million of the flight height=H/5000). Sometimes, this can make it unachievable and the altimetry
requirements must be met by other means.
Having defined the flight scale, flight strips must be studied. In the simplest situations, the coastal band
can be covered by a set of rectilinear strips (see Fig. 6.23)
Fig. 6.23
When coastal features are extensive, wider inshore surveys are required. In this case, blocks of several
strips must be planned (see Fig. 6.24).
Additionally end and side overlaps must be planned; generally, the end overlap is of 60% and the side
overlap of 20%. When orthophotographs are required (see 3.1.1) or when ground features are so uneven
that there is a possibility in gaps leaving some part of the information without stereoscopy, it may be
necessary to enlarge the overlapping.
M-13
339
Fig. 6.24
The sun’s altitude and angle during the flight should be considered, particularly in higher latitudes
(ϕ>50º) in wintertime.
To ensure that shadows do not interfere or impact on image quality, the sun altitude angle should be
greater than 30º. The more uneven and cluttered the ground, the greater the elevation angle should be.
The flight time may be limited by the time of the year and the latitude.
An additional limit for hydrographic surveys is that the flights should take place near low water to allow
detection of features and dangers close to the foreshore in the inter-tidal zone.
The sky must be free of clouds below the flight height whilst many other meteorological conditions must
be satisfied during the operation. All these limitations combine to make flight times longer and planning
more complex.
The ground control and its densification by aerotriangulation must be considered when planning the
flight. This provision is necessary to allow the opportunity of performing field tasks during the survey
group’s presents in the area.
The end overlap produces coverage as detailed in Fig. 6.25. If the overlap is of 60% or more there is a
zone of 20% or more of triple overlap.
M-13
340
Fig. 6.25
In this zone, like in the side overlap (see fig 6.24), aerotriangulation can be carried out.
3.1.4 Restitution
The photogrammetric technique restitution is the basic process in the 3D treatment of the topographical
information, generally aerial images are used. Restitution is carried on the optical, mechanical, analytical
or digital adjoining photogram projection in the overlap zone, which allows stereoscopy observation.
In any version it is necessary to determine the relative and the absolute orientation of the model which
replicates that part of the ground being surveyed.
A pair of photographs is oriented by intersecting five pairs of homologous rays corresponding to five
ground points. This process is achieved by removing their parallaxes through motion projectors or by an
equivalent digital process.
Prior knowledge of the co-ordinates of the selected points is not required; however it is expedient to
choose them from the end overlap zone (see Fig. 6.26).
Fig. 6.26
M-13
341
Having done this, a 3D model is created, even though neither its position in the reference frame nor its
scale has been defined. In other words, only a relative position of the photographs coincident with the
cameras during the flight in an unknown scale and reference frame. It is possible to observe
stereoscopically the entire model whilst holding the observed images location.
To assign a scale to this model and to express it in a reference frame compatible with the survey, at least
3D positions of two points (for example 1 and 2 from Fig.6.27) and the height of a third one must be
known. However it is better to know the three co-ordinates of 1, 2, 3 and 4, which allows some
verification.
Fig. 6.27
Of course, this adjustment can be undertaken in an analogical way, by optical or mechanical means or
numerically by analytical or digital stereo plotters.
With the models absolutely oriented, it is possible to obtain a topographic representation of the relief and
description of features or infrastructures. The contour lines can be traced by analogical or digital means.
In the latter case, it is possible to make a Digital Terrain Model (DTM) with a convenient density of
stored points.
To obtain digital copies of the information, at present the simplest way is to scan aerial photographs
through high-resolution scanners; however in the future, it will be available with information taken from
digital cameras as mentioned at the end of 3.1.1.
3.1.5 Aerotriangulation
As has been described in 3.1.4, for the absolute orientation of a stereoscopic model in restitution, it is
necessary to know the three sets co-ordinates of four points distributed as in Fig.6.27, although in
principle the three sets of co-ordinates of 2 points and the vertical of a third point may be sufficient.
To achieve such control, whilst minimizing field work, an internal process has been developed by
photogrammetry: aerotriangulation.
The first process in this technique consists in providing the ground control for the first model,
determining its absolute orientation and then, passing to the second model adding a third image. Having
completed all the movements in the third image projection, without modifying the previous during the
process for the second model’s relative orientation, it will be clear that absolute orientation has been
transferred.
M-13
342
It is possible to repeat the process detailed above, however deformations could appear. Apart from the
deviation, the effects due to terrestrial curvature and refraction of light rays must be considered. For this
reason it is necessary to adjust the strip by adding ground control points.
Fig. 6.28
A strip with four start control points, four close control points and two intermediate pairs is shown in Fig.
6.28 (also see Fig. 6.23). The intermediate pairs should be present in six models in order to successfully
solve for deformations and propagation of the deviation.
Both control points and tie points, to hold the restitution, must be present in the zone of triple
superposition and when necessary with the side overlap.
Although the described distribution corresponds to analogical aerotriangulation processes, hydrographic

experience shows that frequently a control is still valid in coastal surveying (see Fig. 6.23). This is also
valid when strip adjustment is carried out through independent models using an analytic process. In this
case, the normal method, after determining every relative orientation, is to note each model’s co-ordinates
and then to adjust them in numerical terms.
When there are several strips with side overlaps (see Fig. 6.24), block adjustment with independent
models can be completed with certain advantages from the merged rigid set.
Points subjected to aerotriangulation are:
a. Ground control points;

b. Tie points;
c. Additional points for restitution control or items of detail requiring specific calculation.
Then, holding the co-ordinates of the ground control points fixed whilst taking into account their relation
with tie points, a block adjustment can be undertaken. As a result, co-ordinates of the tie points and any
additional points can be obtained and expressed in the ground control points’ reference frame.
There are seven parameters for each transformation model in a normal process: one scale, three
translation parameters and three orientation ones. Several software versions are available; the basic ones
deal with the planimetric and altimetry processes separately. The more elaborated ones are based on 3D
treatments with an important statistical analysis which tends to clean up the influence of out of tolerance
deviations. With these kinds of blocks, the required amount of ground control points can be minimised.
There is an integral utilisation for them and a strong linking between models to emphasise the set rigidity.
With 5 + 0.2M ground control points, successful results can be achieved, M is the number of independent
models that constitutes the block.
A block of independent models under adjustment is shown in Fig. 6.29. It must be remembered that apart
from the number of ground control points, their distribution is important to assure an accurate and rigid
network for the restitution.
M-13
343
Fig. 6.29
For simplicity, only a few rays from the perspective centres to the points under aerotriangulation are
shown. These perspective centres are associated with the objective position at the moments of exposure.
The ground control points, of which some are coincident with tie points, but not in every case, are also
indicated.
Fig. 6.29 is also useful to demonstrate the linking that can be achieved through intercepting homologous
rays.
Even though they have been chosen by stereoscopy observation, the measuring of plane co-ordinates
inside each image, without stereoscopic processing, sets up these rays. Through this method, at least nine
points from the photogram are usually measured with a distribution as shown in Fig. 6.30. The stability
of a block adjusted through this bundle block adjustment technique is higher than that achieved through
strips or independent models. Occasionally, a first adjustment is conducted through independent models
and then, with these provisional co-ordinates, the last adjustment is undertaken through bundle of
homologous rays.
• • •
• • •
• • •
Fig. 6.30
In the block adjustments, by independent models or by bundle, apart from the three co-ordinates for each
point being processed, co-ordinates for perspective centres are also created.
M-13
344
There are cameras which can be synchronised with GNSS systems. They have the capacity to receive
differential corrections; the position of the centres can be introduced in the block adjustment. Thus, the
number of ground control points can be reduced. Systems with three or more antennas are being
developed in order to extend the capacity to the calculation for orientation.
There are other means to increase aerotriangulation capacity and whilst minimising ground works; the
obtaining of images at smaller scales is among them. It has certain validity for horizontal co-ordinates but
it is not capable, as yet, for solving altimetry requirements accurately. Some transversal strips at the same
or smaller scale are also used. At the present time all these procedures for small photogrammetric scales
(1:20000, 1:50000, 1:100000, ...) are avoided and replaced with the described technique of GNSS
positioning through the projection centres with minimum ground control.
3.1.6 Ground control
One of the main tasks of topographic field surveying is the creation and marking of ground control points.
Although in 3.1.5 some guidance for selecting the points to allow aerotriangulation are given, it is
necessary to consider the specified requirements of those responsible for restitution or the
aerotriangulation processes. The objective of aerotriangulation is the control of the restitution described
in 3.1.4
Selecting of control before the flight is theoretically possible, deciding on the positioning points which
are to be photographed. However, the control is frequently selected after the flight by positioning
identified points on the photographed images. This is a way of avoiding problems caused by the short life
of artificial marks.
Apart from obtaining the values of the co-ordinates of the control points, their plots must be completed.
An initial impression for that information can be acquired from photogram copies or on a photo-plot.
Sometimes the feature is pricked through the image with details written down on the back. However, this
is not always sufficient and it is necessary to add a description with graphs to clarify the chosen detail and
to fix its position and the reference level for the vertical co-ordinate. This is important because
sometimes the appropriate detail to fix the horizontal position has no well-defined level. For example, the
corner of a building is a good point with which to refer a horizontal position but the ground level or both
must be identifiable to give good vertical control.
In every case the description obtained in situ must be compatible with that which can be obtained by
stereoscopic information. To do this it is useful to have a stereoscopy and accurate image copies to
analyse this information or to observe it through a stereo plotter to provide the description to be used in
aerotriangulation.
The accuracy in the position of ground control points must be carefully studied, taking into consideration
the desired aerotriangulation results to control the restitution. A maximum deviation of 100ppm
(100parts per million) of the flight height (that is H/10000) in the three co-ordinates can be accepted. In
cases where difficulties arise, acceptable alternatives must be available and analysed.
Apart from the issues on the instructions for distribution of ground control points, accounting for the
aerotriangulation adjustment, it is expedient to clarify that the provision of x, y and z co-ordinate points
around the outside edge of the block are more useful; some internal points may be limited to the vertical z
co-ordinate only.
M-13
345
3.1.7 Stereo plotter generalities. Digital processing.
A simplified scheme of a stereo plotter is shown in Fig. 6.3.1. It has two photogram supports (on film or
in digital format) on which co-ordinates xý´ and x´ý´´ can be read. It also has an observation device
(represented by two eyepieces) which has two (optical, optical/mechanical, electronic) paths inside it to
allow each eye to partially see each image, making the stereoscopic model available for measurements.
The paths have floating marks with which to form a point which can be seen in 3D near the model. These
marks can be moved on the model in the direction of the flight through the X control, transversal to the
flight with the Y control and vertically via the Z control.
Y
X
Fig. 6.31
As is indicated in Fig. 6.31, controls in x and y are operated through cranks and z through a pedal.
Through codifiers related to the movements in x, y and z, these co-ordinates can be registered. An
independent model aerotriangulation process can then be applied to them. To conduct the process
through ray bundles, it is necessary to have an instrument with codifiers to register photogram co-
ordinates (x´, y´, x´´ and y´´)
Apart from the required accuracy to distinguish 100ppm of the flight height (H/10000), an instrument
suitable for aerotriangulation must have all the essentials to register and to codify.
Naturally, all the stated registration, codification elements and others related to orientation and inner
equipment performance, should be connected to a computing system, particularly in analytical and digital
versions (see 3.1.4).
In the new digital versions (soft or video plotters) a computer monitor is used to display the data required
to carry out the observations detailed above (see Fig. 6.51). Both photograms are projected alternatively
onto the monitor, the operator views one in each eye through special observation equipment (anaglyph,
polarised lens or other electro-optical means), which create a stereoscopic image and therefore the ability
to make the required measurements. Other peripherals are connected as indicated in Fig. 6.32. In a digital
stereo plotter, the image is provided by a stereo camera (CCD = charge coupled device).
Fig. 6.32 shows a data flow diagram in a digital stereo photogrammetric system.
M-13
346
In electromechanical restitution devices the plotter gives the final output version of the work, additionally
the plot was produced analogically without the aid of a computer process. In digital versions data output
consists of files containing a precise format for future graphic manipulation (soft copy), such as a
Geographic Information System (GIS). In these digital cases, the use of a plotter is a supplement
providing a global overview of the aerophotogrammetry process.
The use of soft copy files is extremely convenient for hydrographic survey processing. The information
from the photogrammetric process can be superposed, compared and made compatible with other data
which is generated from the topographic field work, previous work or near shore bathymetric data.
Fig. 6.32
3.1.8 Photo interpretation
Photo interpretation involves the examination of photographic images, sometimes supported by

stereoscopic observation, which allows the identification of objects and features, as well as certain soil
properties, vegetation, etc., in order to obtain a qualitative description of its character, use or behaviour.
In many cases, the relation between flight height and smooth topographic features is not sufficient for the
relief to be viewed with sufficient detail to define the drain lines, as indicated in Fig.6.19. Nevertheless, it
can be achieved through a minutely precise analysis of aerial photographs, thus, it is possible to detect the
existence of temporary courses, separated by watersheds, whose features are clearer than in the relief
interpretation. This is a typical example where photo interpretation can achieve more accurate
descriptions than photogrammetry with small scale imagery, although this procedure should not be
extrapolated.
M-13
347
Generally, image interpretation, photo interpretation being a particular case, can be undertaken more
successfully by experts in their particular field. For example, a coastal engineer can make better
conclusions regarding the behaviour of a beach than a surveyor, because he can analyse wave refractions
and certain erosion processes.
In certain cases, very detailed contour lines can be traced assisted by images obtained from different
periods, not only above the high waterline and the inter-tidal zone, but for the existence of permanent
vegetation or the lines left by the flood tide currents before the backrush or the water image changes
tonality with the depth.
An accurate combination between the calibration and the observation can be attained by comparison of
some topographic or bathymetric measurements. This can produce excellent results. Nevertheless it is
necessary to prove a strict correlation between the detected evidences, for example tone changes, and the
measurements. If this is not verified, the basis for the interpretation must be revised. Sometimes, the
behaviour of thematic phenomena is incorrectly interpreted as the presence of shoaler zones.
A photo interpreter’s experience and the checking of doubtful details in the field allow photo
interpretation to be a very useful procedure as a complement to topographic surveys.
3.2 Not Photogrammetric Remote Sensing Imagery
In this section only non-photogrammetric systems and methods will be considered. As stated previously,
the term “Remote Sensing” is applied to the detection of objects and the determination of their position
and some properties without making actual physical contact with them. Although the term remote
sensing covers all the techniques for making observations at distance, such as those based on acoustics,
gravity and aero-magnetics, at the present time, the normal sense of the term has been restricted to that of
the electromagnetic energy.
A generic remote sensing system is composed of four basic elements (Chuvieco, 1995) (Fig. 6.33):
Sensor system: sensor and platform (including the rocket vehicle which transports it until
in the definitive operation orbit);
Scene: is the ground area covered within a certain time by the sensor;
Source of Energy: is the Sun (for the passive sensors) or generated by the sensor (for the
active sensors).
System of Process, Sale,

Interpreter and Final User: involves the reception-capture station, antenna, tracking system, sales,
distribution agency, interaction with the client and finally the final user
(i.e. government agency, defence, university, domestic service
companies, etc.).
M-13
348
Fig. 6.33 "Remote sensing system (satellite passive sensor case)"
3.2.1 Satellite and sensors for Earth Resources Remote Sensing
The satellites employed in earth resources remote sensing use 2 types of orbits (Fig. 6.34):
a. Equatorial geostationary orbit: the satellite is at circa 36000 km distance and is over a fixed
point on the Equator. These satellites only look at the Earth’s surface in a particular way for a
dedicated function; i.e. European meteorological satellite METEOSAT, the American GOES, etc.
b. Cuasi-polar sun-synchronous orbit: the satellite uses much lower orbits (700 to 1200 km) and
it always passes over the Equator at the same time (sun-synchronous), moving a certain distance
along the Equator and passing near the poles.
i.e. SPOT, LANDSAT, NOAA, METEOR, JERS, ERS, RADARSAT, etc.
M-13
349
Fig. 6.34 "Main satellite orbits"
The instrument-sensors can be classified according to system methodology:
a) In the origin of the energy source used, they are divided into (Fig. 6.35):
Passive: the instruments capture the radiated energy emitted from the area of interest and
generate a corresponding and measurable electric signal. The energy source is the Sun.
Examples: MSS and TM LANDSAT, AVHRR NOAA, HRV SPOT, MMRS SAC-C.
Active: the sensors emit an energy beam and register the backscattered proportion from the
Earth’s surface. They are able to obtain images in any meteorological or light conditions, since
the energy source is self generated and independent of the Sun.
Examples: SAR ERS, JERS and RADARSAT.
M-13
350
Fig. 6.35 "Passive and active sensors"
b) The useable sections of the electromagnetic spectrum:
Optic: this includes the visible spectrum of the human eye (0.4 μm – 0.7 μm) and the reflected
or near infrared (0.7 μm – 3 μm).
Examples: MSS LANDSAT, HRV SPOT, MMRS SAC-C.
Thermal: corresponds to the thermal or emissive infrared (7 μm – 15 μm).

Examples: AVHRR NOAA, TM LANDSAT.
Microwave: the longer length waves (mm to cm) used mainly by the radars.
Examples: SAR ERS, JERS and RADARSAT.
Sources of electromagnetic radiation which may be used for remote sensing can be natural such
as the sun, earth and atmosphere or artificial sources such as flash lamps, laser and microwave
emitters.
The main natural energy source is the sun, whose radiated energy reaches a maximum (peak) at a
wave length of 0.47 μm (green visible). On its way to the Earth, sun energy passes through the
atmospheric layer and undergoes complex interactions, summarised in the effects of absorption,
reflection, scattering and emission (Fig. 6.36):
M-13
351
Fig. 6.36 "Radiation received by the sensors"
The different components are:
1. Radiation reflected by the atmosphere;

2. Radiation scattered by the atmosphere;
3. Radiation reflected by Earth surface;
4. Radiation emitted by Earth surface;
5. Radiation emitted by atmosphere.
Only a small part of the energy captured by the sensor is used to extract information regarding the Earth’s
resources: that reflected and/or emitted by the Earth’s surface. The rest should be filtered to enable
additional information to be extracted.
There are zones in the spectrum, which have a better electromagnetic radiation path; they are called
“atmospheric windows” (Fig. 6.37). In these zones the absorption is lower, so the transmitted energy is
higher. The main windows are:
0.4 – 0.7 μm in the visible;

3.5 – 5.5 μm and 8 - 14 μm in the thermal IR
The sensor captures and measures the electromagnetic energy coming from the area of interest in discrete
spectrum bands. The measurement of the intensity of the transmitted energy from a target in each band is
called spectral response or the “spectral signature” of this target.
M-13
352
Fig. 6.37 "Atmospheric windows"
3.2.2 Main Remote Sensing Systems
The main remote sensing systems can be classified as follow:
PASSIVE SENSORS:
• Photographic systems
• Return Beam Vidicon Systems
• Opto-mechanical scanners
• Opto-electronical scanners
ACTIVE SENSORS:
• Radar systems
• Photographic systems
The photographic cameras were the first sensors able to receive multispectral pictures from space. They
continue to be a method often used for remote sensing, particularly from air platforms. Their basis of
operation is the impression of a scene onto photosensitive films via an optic system which allows control
of the exposure conditions.
Most important characteristics are:
a. Film type: The most commonly utilised is the panchromatic film, on which the whole visible
spectrum can be captured on a single emulsion. Radiation corresponding to the near or reflected
infrared (IR) is captured in grey tones with the infrared film.
b. Number of objectives: Multiple observations can be carried out with two different constructions,
incorporating several lens, each one of them with an appropriate filter, either in a single camera,
which enable impressions of the same image in different bands of the spectrum, or by assembling
several cameras on the same platform, each one with different filters and appropriate films. (See Fig.
6.38)
M-13
353
c. View angle: In vertical photography (the most often employed), the images are captured
approximately orthogonal to the land surface (5° deviation being permitted) and in oblique
photography, a viewing angle of less than 90° (used in studies of the relief, urban infrastructure, etc.).
d. Observation height: The height (H) is highly variable, depending whether it is air or space
photography and the relationship with the focal distance (f) determines the scale (S) of the obtained
photogramm (See 3.1.1).
S = f / H
An example of space photography can be cited in the panchromatic and IR pictures taken from the
Space Shuttle during the European Spacelab Program (1983). Indeed, with the metric camera RMK
20/30 some stereoscopic pictures were obtained of several regions of the world, at a scale of 1:
820.000 at 250 km high with an approximate resolution of 20 to 30 m, these were used mainly for
cartographic purposes (Konecny, 1986).
More recently, cameras like the MKF-6 (Fig. 6.38), on board the Soyuz space laboratory, have
allowed the capture of pictures of high resolution and in 6 bands of the visible and near IR spectrum
(Chuvieco, 1995). Also on board the Soyuz, cameras, as the KFA 1000, with focal distance of 1 m
approximately and at 351 km of distance, achieved geometric resolutions from 5 to 10 m.
Fig. 6.38 "MKF-6 multispectral camera"
• Return Beam Vidicon Systems
Return Beam Vidicon (RBV) was a passive sensor similar to a television camera tube. This sensor failed
early on the first ERTS (called LANDSAT after) and never came into routine use.
Two RBV cameras observed the whole surface in instantaneous form, using colour filters to provide
multispectral bands centred in the blue-green, yellow-red and red-IR spectra in the first two LANDSAT
satellites.
M-13
354
A forth RBV camera on Landsat-3 was a panchromatic (0.505 - 0.750 µm) version that provided four
adjoining images at 30 m resolution.
This type of system has been used in TIROS and LANDSAT satellites, among others.
• Opto – mechanical scanners systems
These types of scanner are opto-mechanical instruments, where a mechanically driven optical element,
generally a rotating or oscillating mirror, is used to deflect an optical beam to the detectors at right angles
to the line of flight. The axis of rotation or oscillation of the mirror is parallel to the line of flight or orbit.
As examples, aircraft Daedalus scanner uses a rotating system and the LANDSAT satellite series utilises
an oscillating system in their Multi Spectral Scanner (MSS) (Fig. 6.39).
Fig. 6.39 "LANDSAT MSS (after NASA, 1997)"
MSS LANDSAT consists of a mobile mirror that oscillates perpendicularly to the flight direction. The
received radiation passes to a set of detectors which amplify and convert it to an electric signal. This
signal is converted to a numeric value which can be stored on board or transmitted to the network of
reception ground antennas.
In summary, the sensor transforms an analogue signal, the received radiation, into a digital value,
generating digital images. These radiation values can be translated, again, in radiation levels, knowing
the calibration coefficients of the sensor and the conditions of acquisition.
The number and attributes of the detectors, which contain the scanning equipment, is fundamental in
understanding the characteristics of the resulting image.
M-13
355
The signal sent by the optic system to these detectors is re-sampled at regular intervals, so only a numeric
value is recorded at each certain distance. That interval marks the size of the minimum information unit
acquired by the sensor; it is termed a “pixel” (picture element). The signal detected by each pixel has a
direct relationship to the type of observed surface. If the signal originates from a homogeneous surface,
the value of the pixel will correctly define it; in the case of a heterogeneous surface, the result will be an
average of the characteristics of the area observed.
In many scanners, the received signal breaks down on board into several wavelengths, each one directed
to a special type of detector sensitive to this energy range. These are known as multispectral scanners,
because they are able to detect the same land surface utilising different spectrum bands.
The advantages of the multispectral scanners, in relation to the simple photographic sensors, are
(Chuvieco, 1995):
a. They enable enlargement of the detected spectrum band to wavelengths longer than the visible one.
The emulsions are limited to the range 0.4 to 0.9 μm, while the scanners can embrace from 0.4 to 12.6
μm, including the medium and thermal infrared;
b. Easier calibration and radiometric correction of data;
c. Ability to undertaken systematic and extensive coverage due their capacity to transmit data in real
time;
d. Digital recording of the information, which improves their reliability and allows computer processing.
Disadvantages are the limited area resolution and the need for specific image processing systems.
Examples of these systems are the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) in the
satellites TIROS-NOAA and the Multi-Spectral Scanner (MSS) LANDSAT.
A more sophisticated multispectral imaging sensor, named the Thematic Mapper (TM), has been added to
LANDSATs 4 to 7. Although similar in operational modes to the MSS, the TM consists of seven bands
which have differential characteristics, adding bathymetric, geological and thermal capabilities with
improved geometric resolution.
• Opto – electronic scanners systems
In the optic-electronic scanners, also called “pushbroom”, the oscillating mirror is eliminated, due to a
chain of detectors which cover the whole field of vision of the sensor. These detectors are energised by
the orbital movement of the satellite, enabling them at each instant to survey a complete line, which
moves simultaneously with the platform. The solid detectors which make-up an optical-electronic
scanner are termed “Charge Couple Devices” (CCD) (Fig. 6.40).
M-13
356
Fig. 6.40 "CCD system (after Chuvieco, 1995)"
With this type of sensor the space resolution of the system increases compared with conventional
scanners, whilst eliminating the moving parts. It is also not necessary for the sensors to be interrogated
by pixel, but rather by line, which in turn makes it more responsive for detection and emission of data.
Examples of this system are the High Resolution Visible (HRV) sensor of the French SPOT satellite, the
German MOMS and the sensors of Indian IRS-1 and Japan MESSR MOS-1.
• RADAR systems
The RADAR (RAdio Detection And Ranging) enables information about the topography, roughness, land
cover and moisture of the scene to be acquired using an active radiometer of microwaves, which works in
a spectral band between 0.1 cm and 1m. Due to their ability to operate in any atmospheric and light
condition, they are increasingly used. There are important differences between how a radar image is
formed and what is represented in that image compared to optical remote sensing imagery. To interpret
radar imagery, it is necessary to understand the radar configuration, the energy associated with radar
remote sensing, the way in which that energy interacts with surface targets and the way in which this
interaction is represented in the image (Davidson, 1997).
The radar principle of operation is based on the emission of a pulse (beam) of microwaves (radio) toward
the scene or target. The incident energy is backscattered by the scene towards the radar, which measures
the intensity (detection) and the time lapsed between emission and reception (range) (Fig. 6.41).
M-13
357
Fig. 6.41 "RADAR basic operation"
The Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is the radar type most used in satellites. The principle is based on
the Doppler effect, which affects the recorded observations when a relative motion between an object
(target) and sensor is observed in the pulses from the terrestrial surface target caused by successive
moments of the satellites orbit trajectory. The resulting resolution is equivalent to that which would be
obtained with an antenna of similar length at the distance between the extreme points from which
backscatter is received from the same target (Fig. 6.42).
Fig. 6.42 "Synthetic Aperture Radar concept"
Examples of SAR natural resources sensors are the European ERS and ENVISAT, the Canadian
RADARSAT and the Japan JERS.
M-13
358
3.2.3 Image Structure and Support
An image is generated from the energy captured by the sensor, which converts it to an analogical signal.
Then it is processed and stored as a numeric value. The regular storing interval of the signal determines
the images’ unit of information. This minimum segment of data, represented by a single digital value, is
termed a “pixel” (Picture Element), and, as was previously stated, it depends on the sensor geometric
resolution. The pixel is characterised by a Digital Number (DN), resulting from the digital codification of
the radiation detected for that range of the spectrum or band.
The numeric image is a geometric array (matrix), of two dimensions. In each pixel Pij (elementary point
of the matrix) there are three associate values:
a. their line co-ordinate Li;

b. their column co-ordinate Cj;
c. the physical measure made by the receiver in that pixel in a range of wavelength: DNij.
A multispectral image is constituted by k arrays, called channels or bands. In this case, the image
becomes a three-dimensional array, incorporating the band like third dimension. For example, an MSS
LANDSAT multispectral image possesses four channels MSSk, where k = 1, 2, 3, 4. (Fig. 6.43). The
radiometric intensities of a channel are numeric recounts with values whose limits are between 0 and 255,
allowing up to 256 possible values in general. These values are coded in bytes or 8 bits.
Fig. 6.43 "Multispectral image array structure"
M-13
359
The fundamental principle of visualization of a digital image is to associate a colour or a tone of grey to
each radiometric value, conserving at the same time the matrix representation of the image. There are
two visualization possibilities: the visualization of a single channel and the visualization of several
channels in additive synthesis of colours.
In the case of unique channel visualization, a correspondence between intensity (DN) and tone of grey is
defined, so that the minimum intensity (0) is assigned to black and the maximum intensity (255) to white,
assigning the intermediate values to different tones of grey. The histogram of a numeric image is a
graphic representation of the frequency of appearance of the different levels of radiometric intensity
(DN); thus expressing the pixel distribution as a function of their radiometric intensity. The histogram
allows one to know the distribution of the pixels in the image for the interval values from 0 to 255.
To improve a digital image it is possible to modify the correlation between numeric values and the range
of grey or colour. The objective is to increase the global contrast of the image. It is done by replacing the
original values, between the minimum and maximum levels, with new values distributed within the 255
levels, as a way of using all the available grey levels in the visualisation. This can be achieved by
applying a lineal function (straight line), adapting the image according to the curve of the accumulated
histogram or by other viable methods of distribution, the most common using exponentials, the lineal
segments, etc.
For colour visualisation, the principle is the same as that for visualisation in black and white (B/W). The
only differences being there is a colour associated with each channel numeric value and no grey intensity.
Thus there should be a proper palette of colours defined.
There are conventions for the channel colour combination. For instance, the MSS LANDSAT normalised
False Colour Composite (FCC) image assigns the blue colour to the green band (centred at 0.55 μm),
green to the red visible band (0.65 μm) and red to the near-photo IR band (0.75 μm).
There are alternatives for the image recording format. In general, the image contains a “header” file,
which indicates the recording format, the sensor type, geographical location of the area, date, solar
position, data of corrections and calibration of the image. The more frequent recording formats are:
BSQ (Band Sequential): DN follows a sequential order, leaving the origin (line 1, column 1) until the
final pixel of the first band; the succeeding bands then follow on.
BIL (Band Interleaved by Line): The DN are ordered by line. The first line of band one begins, then the
first line of the second band and continuing on with the other bands. Once all the bands are completed, it
passes to second line of the first band, the second line of the second band, etc.
BIP (Band Interleaved by Pixel): The format is similar to the previous method, except in this case the
DN are ordered by pixel. The first pixel is recorded at the origin of each band, then the second pixel, and
so forth until completing the image.
M-13
360
The available image support, requesting the negative or positive film or photographic page, varies
according to the space programme. Negative film is the most versatile product, since it enables the
generation of all the amplifications considered necessary at the desired scale. Positive film is very useful
for photographic reproduction and impressions of the image. Paper is the most commonly issued
analogue media as it guarantees the ability for a direct interpretation of high quality images; however the
scale in which it is presented is rigid. LANDSAT TM image negative films (23x23cm) are offered at a
scale of 1:500.000, while other programmes offer images at a scale of 1:1.000.000, additionally
amplifications can be obtained in paper at scales of 1:250.000 and 1:100.000.
Presently magnetic Computer Compatible Tapes (CCT), Exabyte tapes and Compact-Disk Read Only
Memory (CD-ROM) are the most useful digital media types.
3.2.4 Interpretation and Processing Fundamentals
Image interpretation refers to the techniques required to define, to recognise and to identify objects or
phenomena in an image and to interpret their meaning. To conduct these tasks, it should be considered an
essential part of preparation work to define the parameters and methods to be used.
The scale is one of first parameters to be defined and is linked to the previously mentioned objectives; the
scale defines the minimum unit of information which should be included in the map, termed the
Minimum Cartographic Unit (MCU). It is recommended that the MCU not be less than 4 mm2 at scale of
the map. Thus, the work scale should be related directly with the most suitable type of sensor to
undertaken the project. In accordance with the International Cartographic Association guidance, the most
suitable scale limits for the different sensors are:
LANDSAT – MSS 1 : 200.000

LANDSAT – TM 1 : 100.000
SPOT – HRV 1 : 50.000
To summarise image interpretation factors, the following should be considered:
• Sensor-platform system: The most appropriate sensor type depends on the objectives and the level
of precision required for the project; i.e. global mapping (planispheres) will be carried out starting
with sensors of low space resolution (NOAA AVHRR or SAC-C MMRS) while those requiring a
larger scale will use sensors that offer greater spatial detail (LANDSAT TM or SPOT HRV).
However, in other cases, the spatial resolution is secondary to time or spectral resolution; if the
studied phenomenon is very dynamic in time, such as the detection of spills of oil in the sea, it would
be suitable to use sensors of higher temporary resolution, whilst sacrificing space precision. In other
projects, spectral dimension will be more important such as for studies of ocean colour starting from
optic sensors.
• Image capture date: The most suitable moment to acquire images will be when the phenomenon to
be studied has its highest discrimination ahead of others of similar spectral behaviour; i.e. riverside
area mapping with large tidal amplitude and extended beaches, it will be most suitable to choose low
tides due to having the highest quantity in detectable coastal details, thus image capture should be
planned with an analysis of local tide predictions.
• Image support: Selection of media, on which the interpretation is carried out, depends on the
techniques to be applied. If a visual analysis, then three main aspects should be considered: the
material support of the image, the scale and the band number or selected combination of bands.
M-13
361
Photographic film or paper is ideal for analogical (visual) interpretation, while Exabyte, floppy disks,
CCT or CD-ROM are best for digital processing. Additionally, the ideal number of bands for a
project depends on the phenomenon being mapped or monitored.
• Selection of the analysis method: Image analysis methods can be visual or digital. Each has its
own advantages and disadvantages. Visual treatment requires lower inversion than digital processing;
however, computer processes presents lower unitary costs with larger areas, while visual
interpretation follows linear costs.
In summary, when undertaking complex works the results of both methods are suitable, although digital
methods are gaining in importance due to advances in image processing, via computer equipment
(hardware) and programs (software).
Remote sensing image visual interpretation is based on the same skills used in classic air-photo
interpretation. VIR and SAR images interpretation are similar in that the same interpretation key is used.
When SAR images are employed, the unique properties of radar imagery must be remembered and
incorporated into the interpretation process.
Main elements of visual interpretation used are:
• Scale: It is the relationship between lineal dimensions in the image and on the terrain (ground).
S = Image / Ground
In general, scale (S) is expressed as a division with numerator equal to “1” and denominator “D”:
S = 1 / D
• Shape and size: Shape and size are linked directly with scale; shape refers to the spatial form of an
object or area, shape can help to distinguish between natural and cultural features.
The size of a feature can be helpful in distinguishing features from each other in relative terms. The scale
is one factor, which influences the size of an object or feature present on the image. Shape, size and scale
are fundamental for the definition of the patterns.
• Tone: The tone refers to the energy intensity received by the sensor for a certain band of the
spectrum. In a photographic product, pixels with dark tones indicate those areas where the sensor
detected a low sign, while the clear areas are those of high radiation values. The tone is related
closely with the spectral behaviour of the different land covers for the specific spectrum band in
which it works.
In radar images, tone results from target backscatter, tonal variations are usually functions of the strength
of the radar backscatter from the ground; i.e. smooth water surfaces appear dark because they act as a
specular reflector with the energy being reflected away from the sensor.
• Colour: In VIR images the colour is a consequence of the selective reflectivity from the objects to
different wavelengths. Those surfaces with high reflectivity in visible short wavelengths and lower in
the rest appear with blue colour, while those which absorb short wavelengths and reflect long ones
M-13
362
appear with a red tint. If the sensor captures information in the bands of the blue, green and red
spectrum, a composition in natural colour can be obtained.
SAR images are mono-band and so they are viewed in grey tones.
• Texture: Texture is the frequency of tonal or colour changes. It refers to the apparent roughness or
softness of the image region, representing the space contrast between the elements from which it is
composed.
The texture of the image comes from the relationship between the size of the objects and the resolution of
the sensor. In general, texture is classified in thick, medium and fine texture. In SAR images, it may be
classified as smooth, fine, grainy, linear, speckled and flecked.
Contrast is the relationship between clear and dark areas or the tone relationship between an object and
the surrounding objects.
• Shadow: Usually shadow links the dimensions of the object (mainly its height) with the angle of
incidence of the energy (Sun or waves beam).
In SAR images, shadows indicate relief type. Shadow length can be used to estimate height, while their
projection indicates spatial form.
Finally, visual interpretation is carried out by evaluating all the above mentioned parameters and
comparing the characteristics of the displayed objects with well known patterns (i.e. land cover, drainage
net and urban infrastructure, etc.).
The process of identifying or helping to identify features through local and regional context is called
association. For instance, terrain landscape and Antarctic Sea features tend to form associations through
well-understood natural relationships and processes (i.e. floes, fractures and glacial landforms).
• Pattern: Pattern represents the orderly spatial arrangement or repetition of features. Spacing, density
and orientation are indicative of pattern; for example river (or watershed) net is linked to relief,
dendritic pattern is representative of an undulating area (hills, mountains), while meander patterns
represent flat or plain areas.
3.2.5 Image pre-processing and complementary data
The satellite images, obtained by a third party, will have been processed by the acquiring institution in
order to standardise the available products. A base treatment is conducted and, at the client's request,
additional optional treatments improving the geometry and radiometry of the product can be completed,
better adapting it to the objectives of its future application.
The process type and their denomination are characteristic of each system. In general, it is organised in a
progressive hierarchy of corrections, such that each level includes all the previous ones whilst adding
others.
For example, for HRV SPOT products, there are the following treatment levels (Fig. 6.44):
M-13
363
Level 1A: General basic level for all the images, where a calibration of sensors in each spectral band
has been conducted. There is no geometric correction. These images are used in fine
radiometric studies.
Level 1B: Systematic deformations caused by terrestrial rotation, panoramic effect, drift effect and
incidence angle are corrected. There are corrections for geometric origin, but that may
have influenced the radiometry, because a re-sampling is carried out.
Level 2: Geometric and localisation corrections are carried out using internal and external data.
The internal data employees are: data of restored orbit, geometry of the instantaneous
field of view (IFOV) and satellite altitude restitution auxiliary data. The external data are:
parameters of the selected plane representation system, rectification medium altitude
selected and ground control points (GCP) co-ordinates.
There are 2 sub-levels, in functions for the use and not of the GCP:
Level 2A: Two-dimensional corrections are carried out to transfer the scene to a certain cartographic
projection (Mercator, Transverse Mercator, Lambert, etc. - see Chapter 2). Data from
satellite altitude and geometry of the IFOV (instantaneous field of view) are used,
without using GCP.
Level 2B: The geometric correction uses GCP, obtaining a higher precision than in Level 2A.
Level 3: The geometric deformations produced by the relief are considered. It requires data from
the Digital Elevation Models (DEM). The absolute position precision is of the order of
0.5 pixels. As result, an orthomorphism is obtained.
Fig. 6.44 "SPOT image processing levels (adapted from GDTA, 1993)"
M-13
364
Complementary data
Image processing requires complementary data to be used for its geometric corrections and preparation of
the final cartographic product. The geo-codification can be conducted without the GCP but the resultant
position is only relative, if a link to a reference system is required, the use of GCP will be required.
Ground control points (GCP) are points with previously known co-ordinates and clearly identifiable in the
image. They are used to define the co-ordinate transformation equations from the image to the required
geodetic reference system and cartographic projection. They can be obtained from cartographic
documents (charts) or starting from topographical field tasks. In certain cases the land reflective signals
(transponders) can be installed, which are easily detectable in the image, thus enabling the geo-
codification in areas with few natural or artificial details.
Additional cartographic data (type of coasts, navigation obstacles, coastal details and urban, port and road
infrastructure) can be used for the interpretation of the image or to enhance the final product. They can be
obtained from digitalisation of existent charts, from geo-referenced databases (GIS) or from
complementary surveys.
3.2.6 Image processing
Satellite images present geometric and radiometric distortions, which are dependent upon the sensor type,
platform and the capture conditions. In hydrographic applications, information from multiple sources is
very frequently used. Therefore, to standardise, and thus be able to compare and integrate the acquired
data with other information, it should be normal procedure to rectify and to restore (rectification and
restoration) the satellite images. The levelling and correction process depends on the evaluated images
and on the application to which the final product is to be put. In some cases it can be enough just to
correct the systematic errors and then co-register the images with other previously geo-referenced data; in
other cases, the images will be corrected and re-sampled in a cartographic projection with a given scale.
The complete correction of an image involves the initial processing of the raw image data to eliminate the
geometric distortions, the radiometric calibration and the reduction of the actual data noise.
When images of diverse sources (i.e. LANDSAT TM, SPOT PAN, etc) are used, the processes of
geometric correction, rectification, radiometric calibration and enhancement are prior requirements for the
image fusion and they assure the compatibility on a pixel-by-pixel basis. The radiometric enhancement is
as important as the geometric integrity in all aspects of mapping with images because the quality of the
resulting final fused image depends on the precision of the geometric corrections in each participant
image (Pohl, 1996). This should be given particular consideration given the frequent employment of
mosaiced images to complete sectors of charts.
Geometric treatments
The geometric distortions can be classified as systematic (predictable and correctable) and accidental
(random). The systematic errors are easily recoverable by applying formulae derived from modelling the
sources of distortion. The accidental errors are corrected by applying polynomials with points of ground
control (GCP) conveniently distributed in the image.
Geometric corrections can be grouped in following processes:
Co-registration (or registration simply): it is the adjustment of an image taking as a reference another
image, using a polynomial transformation between common points in both. It is used when comparing
two data sets, without utilising the cartographic projection (absolute position).
M-13
365
Geo-reference: it consists of the assignment of co-ordinates to the pixels of the image by means of the
definition of the transformation equations.
Geo-codification: it involves the passage from image to map by means of the application of the
transformation equations. The image becomes a chart, where each pixel has its corresponding
geographical co-ordinate pair. The geo-codification is central to integrate images from diverse sources,
achieving the integral compatibility of its data on a pixel-by-pixel basis.
Polynomial adjustment
Polynomial rectification is a relatively simple method of geometrically correcting the images. It consists
of the transformation of the original image based on a group of appropriately distributed points with well-
known co-ordinates. It is necessary that the points have co-ordinates in both systems: origin (x & y) and
final (X & Y).
Fig. 6.45
The number of well-known points reflects the order of the polynomial in use; as the order increases, a
higher number of points with well-known co-ordinates are required. A system of equations, whose
coefficients are obtained by a least squares adjustment method, is produced.
A polynomial of first order (linear) requires 6 well-known co-ordinated points, it corrects for translation,
rotation, scale, inclination, perspective and oblique distortions in the image (Fig. 6.46).
X = a0 + a1 x + a2 y
Y = b0 + b1 x + b2 y
M-13
366
Fig. 6.46
A polynomial of second order requires 12 well-known co-ordinated points; it adds torsion and convexity
parameters.
X = a0 + a1 x + a2 y + a3 x2 + a4 xy + a5 y2
Y = b0 + b1 x + b2 y + b3 x2 + b4 xy + b5 y2
Applying these equations, the original image can be transformed, resulting in an image shifted, rotated,
scaled and warped.
M-13
367
The polynomial approach only locally corrects the image, since it depends on the distribution of points
and their precision. In general it assures a correct image in flat featureless lands, but it is not very useful
for very undulating areas.
The effectiveness of the adjustment comes from the evaluation of the residuals (deviations); the more
often used indicator is the Root Medium Square error (RMS).
The assignment of the proper DN to the new position (X & Y) pixel can be made following different
algorithms: nearest neighbour, bilinear interpolation and cubic convolution.
Nearest neighbour assigns to each pixel of the transformed image the DN of the nearest pixel in the
original image. It is the quickest solution, but some linear features (roads, riversides, etc) can appear as
fractured lines in the transformed image.
Bilinear interpolation calculates the measured average of the 4 nearest pixels. Here the distortion of the
lineal features is smaller but the spatial contrast is diminished.
Cubic convolution considers the DN of the 16 nearest pixels. It produces a better transformed image but
it requires considerably larger calculating capacity.
In summary, the choice of the method depends on the final use and objective of the project, on the
available computer resources (hardware, software) and on the GCP availability. Also, image processing
differs depending on whether the image comes from an optic (VIR) or from a microwave (SAR) system.
Geometric effects in VIR images
In general, optic images are more distorted by the process for obtaining the image itself than by the
physical characteristics of the scene. For some sensors, such as the TM LANDSAT for example, the
aspect (shape) and terrestrial rotation movement are important factors to consider during the correction of
their images. In general such processes are undertaken by the supplier (see 3.3.5).
For the geo-codification, as described previously (see 3.3.4), object data of well-known co-ordinates
(GCP) is a necessity and, in general, an adjustment by means of polynomials is beneficial.
Geometric effects in SAR images
SAR is a system very sensitive to the physical-chemical and geometric aspects of the target. SAR emits
an energy beam that strikes the target surface sideways, creating a particular geometry with their images
(Fig. 6.47) that can be summarised in the following terms:
• Altitude: distance between the satellite and the sub-satellite point on the surface of the Earth;
• Nadir: intersection of the vertical from the satellite with the terrestrial surface;
• Azimuth: direction, relative to North, of the trajectory of the satellite Nadir point on the
terrestrial surface;
• Range vectors: vectors that connect the SAR to the ground, corresponding to each measured
range sample at a single pulse transmission time;
M-13
368
• Slant range: the distance from the sensor to a target located in the range direction;
• Range direction: range vectors direction (perpendicular to azimuth);
• Ground range: the slant range projected onto the Earth’s surface;
• Incidence angle: the angle between the radar range vector and the local vertical direction (Earth
normal);
• Local incidence angle: angle between the radar range vector and the normal to the surface of
each land element.
Fig. 6.47 "SAR imagery geometry (adapted after Raney 1992)"
The main parameter is the local incidence angle (Fig. 6.48). It can be seen that the geometry of signal-
target interaction is a function of the land slope, which causes various distortions which differentiate it
from a true orthogonal projection.
Fig. 6.48 "Local incidence angle (adapted after Raney 1992)"
Main distortions are called “foreshortening”, “layover” and “shadow” effects (Fig. 6.49).
M-13
369
The effect “foreshortening” occurs when the local incidence angle is smaller than the angle of incidence
but greater than zero. This distortion produces an effect which makes the viewed slope appear to be
shortened and leaning towards the sensor.
In cases of small incidence angles or very abrupt relief, the radar signal returns from the peak of the
mountain before that from the base, producing the effect of “layover”. In these cases the local incidence
angle is larger than the angle of incidence.
The “Shadow” occurs on the slopes which are not illuminated by the radar signal. These areas appear
very dark (without information) in the images.
Fig. 6.49 "Distortions due to the relief (adapted after Lillesand and Kiefer 1987)"
Radiometric treatments
These techniques are useful to improve the radiometry, so that the features of interest appear clearer and
more understandable to the interpreter. They are additional methods to those previously mentioned and
they help in the interpretation of topographical features.
A common method involves the manipulation of the statistic of the image, represented by its histogram,
which details the spectral frequency for each band of the image.
To improve the interpretation of the image, the association between the numeric values and range of grey
or colour is modified with the intention of increasing the global contrast in the image (histogram
stretching). This is equivalent to altering the current digital values for minimum (MIN) and maximum
(MAX) with new values distributed within the 255 levels to make use of all the levels of grey possible.
The distribution can be conducted in several ways, the most frequent being a lineal distribution, which
involves the values between MIN and MAX being redistributed in a straight line between 0 to 255 (Fig.
6.50).
M-13
370
Fig. 6.50
Another means for assisting in the interpretation of the images is the application of spatial filters. The
spatial filters are used to select or to mask a range of values, inside the total DN scale. These filters
suppress certain frequencies, depending on the filter type. The low-pass filter reduces the range of DN in
an area, reducing details and smoothing the general aspect of the image. The high-pass filter enhances the
gradients of DN, i.e. the edges, which are used to better detect roads, railroads, riversides, etc.
The ideal filter is one which smoothes homogeneous areas whilst at the same time preserves limits and
texture; it should maintain the arithmetic average and diminish the standard deviation.
In SAR images, adaptive filters are examples of high-pass filters and are employed to minimise effects of
speckle. There have been numerous algorithms developed in recent times: Lee, Kuan, Frost and Gamma
MAP.
In summary, filters are important for enhancing features and they can contribute to topographical
interpretation, if they are used carefully and with discretion.
Radiometric distortions in VIR images
The sources of radiometric distortions are the atmosphere (due to dispersion and absorption effects), the
sensor (effect of “striping”) and the solar illumination. These effects are described in detail by Lillesand
and Kiefer (1994) and Richards (1986).
Among the different components of the atmosphere, the effect of water vapour in form of haze can be
reduced by applying a modification of the histogram.
A frequent problem is the presence of cloud which reduces the detectable data in optic images. Areas
covered by clouds present a centre with high DN (white, near 255) with diffused and grey borders. Their
corresponding shadows are also detected with very low DN. Resolution is via the application of diverse
methods (thresholding and density slicing) and masks but they require a careful control, since some
artefacts can be produced.
In general, radiometric distortions created by the sensor are small compared with the atmospheric
influences. The most important of these distortions are those generated by the detectors, which manifest
M-13
371
in the form of strips (striping). It is a recurrent effect, which can be removed after the interpretation or
processing of the image (Crippen, 1989).
The correction for the different solar illuminations requires a ratio between bands (band rationing). This
correction is not usually applied, since the solar illumination produces an effect which facilitates the
visual interpretation for cartographic updating.
Radiometric distortions in SAR images
SAR images present their own characteristics, which require particular treatments and calibration. These
characteristics are related to speckle, the process based on multiple views, the range of DN and
radiometric specific corrections.
The “speckle” is a characteristic phenomenon of radar images; it is produced by interference of the

coherent beam by various individual reflectors. The backscattered energy represented in a pixel is formed
from the contributions of a large number of individual reflectors, such tree and vegetation foliage.
Interference of the returning waves to the SAR produces variations in the grey level of the neighbouring
pixels, creating a grainy appearance to the image. Speckle occurs in active systems which use coherent
waves and it limits the radiometric resolution of SAR images (Hoeckman, 1990, Schumann, 1994).
Since it is a random effect, it cannot be totally eliminated. The impact can be diminished using various
procedures, which reduce the spatial resolution.
The process based on multiple views (multi-look processing) is a radar signal process, employed to
reduce the speckle. It can be achieved either by processing the signal to create independent, single look
images at reduced resolution, identifying them and then averaging the image power to form a multi-look
image or it can be accomplished by processing the data to full resolution and spatially averaging the
developed image. The image signal-to-noise ratio is preserved in multi-look processing. Multi-look
processing requires special hardware and software, so it is usually performed at the data reception
facilities.
The range of the pixel digital number “DN” depends on the dynamic range of radar signatures in the
scene and on the digital coding used to create the image. Often SAR data are delivered in 32 or 16 bits
per pixel, however many display and software packages only handle 8 bit range data. Ranges of 16 or 32
bits require high storage and processing capacities. Other conditions (human eye resolution, display
and/or printing capacity, etc) make it more convenient to transform the final data to 8 bit range, thus these
data are expressed in a range from 0 to 255 grey levels. The process of conversion to 8 bits is named
“scaling”.
Frequently additional radiometric enhancement is necessary in order to use the full range (0 to 255). This
process, “stretching”, increases the image contrast allowing the better detection of diverse features.
For SAR images calibration in particular, 2 types of radiometric processing can be applied:
• Absolute calibration: establishes a relationship between the DN in the SAR image and the target
backscattering, independent of the time. It is used when DN should be compared between 2 or
more images, for example for thickness (age) of sea ice, environmental effects, etc.
• Relative calibration: it establishes the same relationship between DN and backscattering, but
only within the image. This results in a target having the same brightness regardless from where
in the SAR image it is taken.
M-13
372
Generally radiometric calibration is carried out at the data acquisition facility.
3.2.7 Altimetry
Land and coastal altimetric information is of great assistance to the hydrographer. Description of the
relief facilitates a clearer understanding of coastal topography, islands, port and signal infrastructure, etc.
High resolution satellite systems allow the representation of relief by numerous diverse means. Presently
the cartographic representation of relief has been generally via numeric modelling (Terrain Numeric
Model TNM) and its digital versions (Digital Elevation Model DEM or Digital Terrain Model DTM).
Procedures have been developed to process various types of data (space photography, VIR sensors, SAR,
altimeters), with different formats (analogical, digital) and for diverse methods (shadowing, stereoscopy,
interferometry, polarimetry) taking advantage of the different characteristics of the sensors and the images
(geometry, radiometry, phase), applying several types of technologies (analogical, analytic, digital) and of
processing (interactive, automatic).
Among the methods, stereoscopic ones have been those which initially have spread more thoroughly for
cartography due to the precursor of well-developed stereo air-photogrammetry (See 3.1).
Coming from the latest advances in the computer stereo vision, considerable advances have been
achieved in the satellite stereoscopy; additionally radar image stereoscopy has had an important stimulus
in the last 20 years.
From the launching of the ERS-1, interferometric techniques were extended using previously developed
parametric models. With the inception of the RADARSAT-1 in 1995, radargrammetry was consolidated
between the different methodologies for altimetric application, using it alone or complemented with VIR
images (Toutin, 2000).
• Stereoscopic methods
Stereo methods are similar procedures to those used in air-photogrammetry (see 3.1.7), in which two
images are used for the construction of the three-dimensional stereo model.
A digital stereo-plotter allows the measurement of features using two floating marks (one for each stereo
pair image), which enable the views to be fused to give 3D cartographic co-ordinates (Toutin, 1995).
The processing of the stereo pair requires the use of digital restitution equipment and specific software.
At the present time compact systems exist, based on PC computers which allow the stereo restitution of
different digital images types (air, space, VIR, SAR). (Fig. 6.51)
M-13
373
Fig. 6.51 "Digital stereo-plotter scheme"
There are a variety of combinations to capture both images, which can be obtained in the same or contrary
directional passes, diverse angles of incidence, etc.
The HRV-SPOT established system has a mobile device installed in the optic equipment, which facilitates
the observation of the same area in successive passes (Fig. 6.52).
Fig. 6.52 "HRV SPOT stereo aptitude"
The MOMS system allows the capture of images in the same pass, by means of cameras in forward, after
and nadir directions. The serial images are taken at intervals of 20 seconds, from three different viewing
points (Fig. 6.53).
M-13
374
Fig. 6.53 "MOMS-02 stereo geometry (after DARA, 1994)"
Another system is the new HRS (High Resolution Stereoscopic) instrument in the SPOT-5 which has two
telescopes looking forward and after in the direction of the orbital trajectory.
The forward-looking telescope captures images at a viewing angle of 20° ahead of the vertical. Ninety
minutes later, the after-looking telescope acquires the same ground area at an angle of 20° behind the
vertical (Fig. 6.54).
Fig. 6.54 "HRS SPOT-5 stereo geometry (after SPOT IMAGE, 2002)"
M-13
375
• Radargrammetry
Radargrammetry is a technique similar to photogrammetry which uses images obtained from the radar
signal. A pair of images is acquired and using their correlation a DEM is generated. In this case, it
should be noted that the angle of incidence is complementary to that corresponding to an optic image.
The absolute precision is of the order of the pixel size. As with stereoscopy, diverse configurations exist
(Fig. 6.55).
Fig. 6.55 "Diverse SAR stereo configurations (after Toutin, 2001)"
• Interferometry
With knowledge of phase of the radar signal, a channel of phase difference and a channel of phase
coherence (constant phase angle) can be generated. They are useful in interpreting the interferometric
information.
Two scenes, taken during two close passes of the satellite and at a distance called “base”, are required.
The base should be less than the maximum value, depending on the frequency of the electromagnetic
wave and between to 0.5-1 km. The environmental conditions (wind, rain, etc.) should be as similar
possible as for both capture occasions.
M-13
376
One of the scenes, the primary, is used as the reference for the calculations. The other, the secondary,
together with the primary is used to calculate a channel of phase difference, called an interferogram, and
one of coherence, which is an indicator of the degree of dependability of the phase measurements. The
phases should then be developed, adopting a resolution and transforming the fringes of the interferogram
in terrain level curves.
The problems of this method:
a. The measurement is ambiguous; since the phase difference is know accurately but not the
quantity (number) of complete wavelengths to the distance radar-target.
b. The phase depends on the radio-electric characteristics of the target. If they are modified between
the scenes, coherence will not be achieved. However, if the fringes of the interferogram can be
correctly built, it indicates that the target has remained unalterable.
3.2.8 Cartographic application
Over the last decades the considerable potential of satellite images, especially in the optic domain for
cartographic updating, has been realised. According to the ISPRS, the mapping requirements utilising
space images, can be divided in three categories:
• Planimetric precision;
• Altimetric precision;
• Detectability (Konecny, 1990).
The more demanding planimetric precision is linked with the cartographic resolution of +/- 0.2 mm,
which generates requirements for the scales (1/D) the more frequent of which are (Table 6.6):
D Planimetric Precision
25.000 +/- 5 m
50.000 +/- 10 m
100.000 +/- 20 m
200.000 +/- 40 m
Table 6.6
The altimetric precision requirement (h), knowing that the equidistance (contour interval “e”) is e = +/-
5 · h, is shown in the Table 6.7.
E H
20 m +/- 4 m
50 m +/- 10 m
100 m +/- 20 m
Table 6.7 (Konecny, 1990)
The detectability refers to the possibility of detecting objects starting with the digital interpretation of the
images. It is a requirement that the object covers at least 1.5 pixels, which creates to the following
minimum dimensions for detectable objects (Table 6.8).
M-13
377
Object – Target Dimension

Urban infrastructure 2m
Land ways 2m
Drainage network 5m
Vial infrastructure 10 m
Table 6.8 (Konecny, 1990)
Taking into consideration the main commercial satellite systems and the most common cartographic
scales, the following usage chart can be produced (Table 6.9):
Satellite sensor Ground resolution Chart scale

QUICK BIRD 0.7 m 1/3500
IKONOS 1–4m 1/5000 – 1/20 000
SPOT PAN 10 m 1/50 000
Landsat 7 ETM 15 m 1/75 000
SPOT XS 20 m 1/50 000 – 1/100 000
RADARSAT 1 SAR 8 – 30 m 1/30 000 – 1/100 000
ERS SAR 30 m 1/100 000
Landsat TM 30 m 1/100 000
Landsat MSS 80 m 1/250 000
SAC-C MMRS 175 m 1/875 000
Table 6.9
M-13
378
MAIN PRESENT SATELLITE SYSTEMS AVAILABLE
The following systems list is not exhaustive. It details some of the most regularly used systems for mid-
high scale cartography.
Satellite Orbit type, Scene area, Sensors

System/ Altitude, Ground Spectral bands
Series Recurrent period, resolution,
Inclination Modes
Country
LANDSAT Sun-synchronous 185 x 185 km
705 km MSS: 80 m Multispectral Scanner (MSS)
USA 16 days Band 1: 0.5 – 0.6 μm (green)
98.2° Band 2: 0.6 – 0.7 μm (red)
Band 3: 0.7 – 0.8 μm (near IR)
Band 4: 0.8 – 1.1 μm (near IR)
TM: 30 m Thematic Mapper (TM)

Band 1: 0.45 – 0.52 μm (blue)
Band 2: 0.52 – 0.60 μm (green)
Band 3: 0.63 – 0.69 μm (red)
Band 4: 0.76 – 0.90 μm (near IR)
Band 5: 1.55 – 1.75 μm (near IR)
Band 6: 10.4 – 12.5μ m (thermal IR)
Band 7: 2.08 – 2.35 μm (mid IR)
ETM+: Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM+)
SPOT Sun-synchronous 60 x 60 km High Resolution Visible (HRV)

832 km
France 23 days Multi Band (XS)
98.7° Band 1: 0.49 – 0.59 μm (green)
XS: 20 m Band 2: 0.61 – 0.68 μm (red)
Band 3: 0.79 – 0.89 μm (near IR)
P: 10 m Panchromatic (P)
0.51 – 0.73 μm
IRS Sun-synchronous 148 x 148 km Linear Imaging Self Scanning (LISS-
900 - 904 km I)
India 22 days LISS-I: 73 m Band 1: 0.45 – 0.52 μm (blue)
99.5° Band 2: 0.52 – 0.569 μm (green)
Band 3: 0.62 – 0.68 μm (red)
Band 4: 0.77 – 0.86 μm (near IR)
LISS-II: 36.5 m Linear Imaging Self Scanning (LISS-

II)
Consists of 2 cameras, same as
above, with swath width 74 km per
camera (145 km together)
M-13
379

Inclination Modes
Country
MOS Sun-synchronous 100 x 90 km MESSR
909 km MESSR: 50 m Band 1: 0.51 – 0.59 μm (green)
Japan 17 days Band 2: 0.61 – 0.69 μm (red)
99° Band 3: 0.72 – 0.80 μm (near IR)
Band 4: 0.80 – 1.10 mμ (near IR)
JERS Sun-synchronous 75 x 75 km Optical Sensor (OPS)

568 km
Japan 44 days OPS: 18 x 24 m Visible and Near Infrared (VNIR)
97.7° Band 1: 0.52 – 0.60 μm (green)
Band 2: 0.63 – 0.69 μm (red)
Band 3: 0.76 – 0.86 μm (near IR)
Band 4: 0.76 – 0.86 μm (near IR)
Short Wave Infrared (SWIR)

Band 5: 1.60 – 1.71 μm
Band 6: 2.01 – 2.12 μm
Band 7: 2.13 – 2.15 μm
SAR: 18 x 18 m
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
1.275 GHz (L-Band) HH
ERS Sun-synchronous AMI works in Active Microwave Instrument (AMI)

777 km three modes. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
Europe 3 - 35 days In Image mode: 5.3 GHz (C-Band) VV
98.5° 100 x 100 km
30 x 30 m (3 Incidence angle fix: 23°
looks)
RADARSAT Sun-synchronous Several modes Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
798 km 5.3 GHz (C-Band) HH
Canada 3 - 24 days In standard mode:
98.6° 100 x 100 km Incidence angle selectable:
30 x 30 m (3 In standard mode: 20° – 50°
looks) In fine mode: 37° – 48°
In fine mode:
50 x 50 km
11 x 8 m (1 look)
M-13
380

Inclination Modes
Country
IKONOS Sun-synchronous Several incidence
681 km angles Band 1: 0.45 – 0.52 μm (blue)
USA 1-3 days Band 2: 0.52 – 0.60 μm (green)
98.1° Multi-band: 4 m Band 3: 0.63 – 0.69 μm (red)
(with nominal Band 4: 0.76 – 0.90 μm (near IR)
angle 26°) Panchromatic band: 0.45 – 0.90 μm
Panchromatic:1
m (with nominal
angle 26°)
_________
M-13
381
ACRONYMS
AIRSAR AIRborne SAR sensor, (J P L)

ASPRS American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
AVHRR Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer
CCD Charge Coupled Device
CCRS Canadian Centre for Remote Sensing
DGPS Differential GPS
DLR German Aerospace Research Establishment
DN Digital Number
DTM Digital Terrain Model
EDM Electronic Distance Measurement
EODM Electro-Optic Distance Measurement
ERS European Remote Sensing Satellite
ESA European Space Agency
ETM Enhanced Thematic Mapper
GALILEO European (ESA) Global Positioning Satellite System
GBAS Ground Based Augmentation System (Reference System for differential satellite
positioning)
GCP Ground Control Point
GIS Geographic Information System
GLONASS Global Navigation Satellite System (Russia)
GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System (GPS + GALILEO + GLONASS)
GPS Global Positioning System (USA)
HRV High Resolution Visible
IFOV Instantaneous Field Of View
IHO International Hydrographic Organization
IHS Intensity Hue Saturation
IR InfraRed
IRS Indian Remote Sensing satellite
ISPRS International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote sensing
JERS Japanese Earth Resources Satellite
JPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory
KFA 1000 Kosmologisher Fotoapparat with 1000 mm focal length
LASER Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation
Lat Latitude
Long Longitude
LUT Look-Up Table
MSS MultiSpectral Scanner
NHO National Hydrographic Office
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
pp. Pages
PAN Panchromatic
ppm Part per million (1 x 10-6)
RBV Return Beam Vidicon
RGB Red Green Blue
RS Remote Sensing
RSI RadarSat International
M-13
382
RTK Real Time Kinematic (Precise GNSS rapid method)

S-44 Special Publication 44 (IHO Standards for Hydrographic Surveying)
SAR Synthetic Aperture Radar
SBAS Satellite Based Augmentation System (Reference system for differential satellite
positioning)
SPOT Satellite Pour l-Observation de la Terre (France)
SSMI Special Sensor Microwave Imager
TM Thematic Mapper
USFAA United States Federal Aviation Association
UTM Universal Transverse Mercator
VIR Visible and near InfraRed
WAAS Wide Area Augmentation System
WGS World Geodetic System
WGS 84 World Geodetic System 1984
XS Multispectral
M-13
383
REFERENCES
(List intended to help the Chapter 6 reader in finding more information through printed matter or web
pages)
ALBERZ J. “Photogrammetric Guide” Wichmann, Karlsruhe (Germany)

KREILING W.,
(1989).
ASPRS ,(1980). “Manual of Photogrammetry” American Society for
Photogrammetry and Remote
Sensing. Bethesda, Maryland, (USA)
ASPRS ,(1983). “Manual of Remote Sensing. 2 Volumes” American Society for
Sensing. Bethesda, Maryland,
(USA) The Sheridan Press.
ASPRS ,(1996). “Digital Photogrammetry” American Society for
Sensing. Bethesda, Maryland, (USA)
BOMFORD G. “Geodesy 4th Ed” Claredon Press, Oxford (UK).
(1980).
CHUECA PAZOS “Tratado de Topografía (3 Volumes)” Paraninfo, Madrid (Spain)
Et. Al. (1996).
Chuvieco E. (1995). “Fundamentos de Teledetección Espacial” Editorial RIALP, Madrid, Spain, 453
pp.
CNES, (2002). “HRS puts terrain into perspective” SPOT Magazine N°34, 1st semester
2002, pp 10-11.
FEDERAL “Standards and Specification for Geodetic NOAA Rockville Maryland (USA)
GEODETIC Control Networks”
CONTROL
COMMITTEE
(1984).
GDTA, (1995). “Aspects stéréoscopiques de SPOT, Cahier Les Cahiers Pedagogiques du
A2 MNT” GDTA, France, 93 pp.
GERMAN SPACE “MOMS-02-D2 Data Catalogue” DARA, München, Germany.
AGENCY, (1994).
HOFMANN “GPS, Theory and Practice. 5th. Ed ” Springer, Wien (Austria), New York
WELLENHOF Et.Al. (USA)
(2001).
M-13
384
IHO (1998). “IHO Standards for Hydrographic IHB, Monaco. There are also
Surveys. S-44 4th. Ed ” French and Spanish versions
available
IHO (1994). “Hydrographic Dictionary 5th Ed. S–32” IHB, Monaco. Also available are
Spanish version (1997) and French
version (1998).
JOECKEL R., “Elektronische Entfernungs und Wittwer, Stuttgart (Germany).
STROBER M. Richtungsmessung, 3th. Ed”,
(1995).
KONECNY, G., “Review of the latest technology in Hanover, Germany, pp. 11-21.
(1990). satellite mapping. Interim report, Inter-
commission Working Group I/IV on
International Mapping and Remote
Sensing Satellite Systems of ISPRS,
Vol.14”
LANGERAAR W. “Surveying and Charting of the Seas” Elsevier. Amsterdam (The
(1984). Netherlands), Oxford (UK) New
York (USA) Tokyo (Japan)
LAURILA S. (1976). “Electronic Surveying and Navigation” J. Wiley & Sons, New York (USA)
LEICK A. (1995). “GPS Satellite Surveying. 2nd. Ed”. Wiley Chichester, Brisbane. New
York (USA) Toronto (Canada)
Singapore.
LILLESAND, T.M. “Remote sensing and image interpretation, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New
and KIEFER, R.W., 2nd edition” York, 721 p.
(1987).
MEISENHEIMER D. “Vermessungsinstrumente Aktuell” Wittwer, Stuttgart (Germany)
(1995).
NASA, (1997). “The Remote Sensing Tutorial”. Goddard Space Flight Centre,
NASA Web Production. Written by:
Nicholas M. Short, Sr.
OLLIVER F. (1995). “Instruments Topographiques” Eyrolles, Paris (France)
OLIVER C. and S. “Understanding Synthetic Aperture Radar Artech House, Norwood,
QUEGAN (1998). Images” Massachuset (USA)
POHL, C., (1996). “Geometric aspects of multi-sensor image ITC Publication Number 39, The
fusion for topographic map updating in the Netherlands, 214 pp.
humid Tropics”
RANEY, R.K., “Course notes; unpublished notes” Canada Centre for Remote Sensing,
(1992). Ottawa, Canada.
M-13
385
RICHARDUS P. “Project Surveying”. Balkema. The Netherlands.

(1977).
SEEBER G. (1993). “Satellite Geodesy” W. de Gruyter Berlin (Germany)
New York (USA)
SEEBER G. (2003). “Satellite Geodesy 2nd. Ed ” Walter de Gruyter (Berlin - NY)
TORGE W. (2001). “Geodesy” W. de Gruyter Berlin (Germany)
New York (USA)
TURNBULL D. “The Evolution of an Object - Oriented Bulletins Hydr. Int. Jul. Aug. - Sep;
(2001). Geospatial Information System Supporting IHO, Monaco
Digital Nautical Chart Maintenance at the
NIMA”
TOUTIN, Th., “Evaluation de la précision géométrique Journal Canadien de télédétection,
(1998). des images de RADARSAT” 23(1):80-88.
TOUTIN, Th., “Single versus stereo ERS-1 SAR imagery International Journal of Remote
(1997). for planimetric feature extraction” Sensing, 18(18):3909-3914.
TOUTIN, Th. and B. “Value-added RADARSAT Products for Canadian Journal of Remote
RIVARD, (1997). Geoscientific Applications” Sensing, 23(1):63-70.
TOUTIN, Th., “Generating DEM from stereo images EARSeL Journal Advances in
(1995). with a photogrammetric Remote Sensing, 4(2):110-117.
approach: Examples with VIR and SAR
data”
WOLF R., “Elementary Surveying 9th. Ed. ” Harper Collins College Publishers
BRINKER R.C. New York (USA) There is available
(1994). also a Spanish version "Topografía",
Alfaomega, México (1998)
M-13
386
URL ADDRESSES
COUNTRY INSTITUTION WEB SITE

European Space Agency http://www.esa.int
International Society on http://www.isprs.org

Sensing
Fédération Internationale de http://www.Fig.net
Géometres
International Association of http://www.gfy.ku.dk/iag/
Geodesy
Argentina Comisión Nacional de Actividades http://www.conae,gov.ar
Espaciales
Austr. – N.Z. Australian - New Zealand Land http://www.anzlic.org.au
Information Council
Australia Commonwealth Scientific & http://www.csiro.au
Industrial Research Organization
Australia Surveying and Land Information http://www.auslig.gov.au
Group
Bolivia Centro de Levantamientos http://www.clas.unmss.edu.bo
Aeroespaciales y SIG
Brazil Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas http://www.inpe.br
Espaciais
Canada Centre For Remote Sensing http://www.ccrs.nrcan.ca
Canada Radarsat International http://www.rsi.ca
Canada Geodetic Survey http://www.geod.emr.ca
Chile Agencia Chilena del Espacio http://www.agenciaespacial.cl
China China Academy of Space http://fas.org/nuke/guide/china/contractor/cast.ht

Technology m
France Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales http://www.cnes
France Group pour le Développement de la http://www.gdta.fr

Téledetection Aerospatiale
Germany Institute für Erdmessung, Hanover http://www.ife.unihannover.de
University
Germany Institute für Angewandte Geodäsie http://www.gibs.leipzig.ifag
Germany Karlsruhe University http://www.ipfr.bau.verm.uni.karlsruhe.de
Germany GPS Information Bulletin Board http://www.gibs.leipzig.ifag.de

System
M-13
387

Germany Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und http://www.dlr.de
Raumfahrt
India Indian Space Research Organization http://www.isro.org
Italy Agenzia Spaziale Italiana http://www.asi.it
Japan National Space Development http://www.nasda.go.jp

Agency
Russia Russian Space Science Internet http://www.rssi.ru
Spain Instituto Nacional de Técnica http://www.inta.es

Aeroespacial
Spain Org. for Cartography and Geodesy http://www.cartesia.org
Spain Valencia University http://www.miranda.tel.uva.es
Switzerland Astronomical Institute Berne http://www.aiub.unike.ch

University
UK Nottingham University http://www.ccc.nottingham.ac.uk
UK British National Space Centre http://www.bnsc.uk
USA Ohio State University (Centre for http://www.cfm.ohio.state

Mapping)
USA Maine University http://www.spatial.maine.edu
USA Geological Survey (EROS) http://edc.usgs.gov
USA Earth Observation Handbook http://www.eohandbook.com
USA Goddard Space Flight Centre http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov

(NASA)
USA Nat. Ocean. And Atm. Adm. Central http://www.lib.noaa
Library
USA Nat. Aeronautic and Space Adm. http://www.nasa.gov
USA National Oceanic and Atmospheric http://www.noaa.gov

Adm.
USA Geological Survey http://www.usgs.gov
USA Professional Survey (review) http://www.profsurvey.com
USA Department of Defence http://www.defenselink.mil
USA National Geodetic Survey http://www.ngs.noaa.gov
USA Institute of Navigation http://www.ion.org
M-13
388

USA Jet Propulsion Laboratory http://www.jpl.nasa.gov
USA Naval Observatory http://www.usno.navy.mil
USA GPS Interface Control Document http://www.navcen.usc.mil/gps
USA Interagency GPS Executive Board http://www.igeb.gov
USA Texas University http://www.host.cc.utean.edu
USA GPS Nav. Inf. http://www.navan.uscg.mil/gps
USA California - Los Angeles University http://www.cla.esc.edu
USA American Society for Photogr. and http://www.asprs.org

R.S.
USA National Imagery and Mapping http://www.164.214.2.59
Agency
USA GPS issues http://www.206.65.196
M-13
389
BIBLIOGRAPHY
(Edited or digital source information used in the preparation of Chapter 6).
ASPRS, (1983). “Manual of Remote Sensing” American Society of

Sensing. 2 volumes. The Sheridan
Press, USA, 2420 pp.
CHUVIECO E. “Fundamentos de Teledetección Espacial” Editorial RIALP, Madrid, Spain, 453
(1995). pp.
CURAN P.J. (1985). “Principles of remote sensing” Longman, London, England.
CURLANDER J.C. “Synthetic Aperture Radar Systems and John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Toronto
and R.N. Signal Processing”
MCDONOUGH,
(1991).
DRURY S.A., “A Guide to Remote Sensing” Oxford Science Publications,
(1990). Oxford, USA, 199 pp.
ELACHI C. and F.T. “Radar Polarimetry for Geoscience Artech House, Boston
ULABY, (1990). Applications”
ELACHI C. (1988). “Spaceborne Radar Remote Sensing: IEEE Press, New York
Applications and Techniques”
FAO, (1990). “Remote sensing applications to land FAO RSC Series 54, Rome, Italy.
resources”
FITCH J.P. (1988). “Synthetic Aperture Radar” Springer-Verlag, New York
HENDERSON F.M. “Principles and Applications of Imaging John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Toronto
and A.J. LEWIS, Radar, Manual of Remote Sensing, Third
EDS. (1998). Edition, Volume 2”
KNEISSL M. (1956). “Handbuch der Vermessungskunde Band Metzer, Stuttgart (Germany)
III (Hohenmessung, Tachymetrie)”
IV (Mathematische Geodäsie)”
II (Feld und Land Messung,
Abstekungsarbeiten)”
MAGUIRE D. et al Geographic Information System Principles John Wiley & Sons N.Y.
(1991). and Applications”
NASA, (1997). “The Remote Sensing Tutorial” Goddard Space Flight Centre,
NASA Web Production. Written by:
Nicholas M. Short, Sr.
M-13
390
OLIVER C. and S. “Understanding Synthetic Aperture Radar Artech House, Norwood, Mass.
QUEGAN (1998). Images”
RINNER K., BENZ “Handbuch der Vermessungskunde Band Metzer, Stuttgart (Germany)
F. (1966) VI (Die Entfernunsmessung nit
Elektromagnetische Wellen und ihre
geodätische Anwendung)”
RINNER K., BENZ “Handbuch der Vermessungskunde Band Metzer, Stuttgart (Germany)
F. (1971). III a,3 Volumes (Photogrammetrie)”
RUSSELL - WOLF “Elementary Surveying” Harper and Row Publishers, New
(1984). York (USA)
The following texts of the REFERENCE LIST were also used:
ALBERZ J. KREILING W (1989)

ASPRS (1996)
BOMFORD G. (1980)
CHUECA PAZOS Et Al (1996)
HOFMANN WELLENHOF Et Al (2001)
IHO (1998)
IHO (1994)
LANGERAAR W. (1984)
MEISENHEIMER D. (1995)
SEEBER G. (1993)
TORGE W. (2001)
WOLF R, BRINKER R.C. (1994)
__________
M-13
391
CHAPTER 6 – ANNEX A
ALGORITHMS FOR THE TRANSVERSE MERCATOR REPRESENTATION
1. PRESENTATION
The Mercator Transverse Representation (see chapter 2, 2.5.4 and 2.5.5) is a useful medium in which to
transfer geodetic co-ordinates (latitude, longitude) to the plane. The use of plane co-ordinates (x & y or N
& E) with small corrections related to the measured distances and angles is suitable for topographic
survey purposes and also for some detailed hydrographic surveys.
2. GEOMETRIC GEODESY AND MATHEMATICAL CARTOGRAPHIC CONCEPTS
Before the study of these concepts, the reader should be familiar with Chapter 2: 2.4 and 2.5, with
particular attention to subparagraphs 2.5.4 and 2.5.5.
Taking the earth rotation ellipsoid as the reference surface, with ‘a’ semi-major (equatorial) axis and ‘b’
semi-minor (polar) axis, it is possible to define:
a−b (flattening, also described as “α” in chapter 2: 2.2.3)

f =
a
(first excentricity, also described as "e" in chapter 2: 2.1.1))
a² − b²
ε =
a
(2nd. excentricity)
a² − b²
ε' =
b
with elemental algebraic procedures it is feasible to verify the following relationships:
f (2 − f ) = ε²
(1 − f )² = 1 − ε ²
with the described constants, the computation of the curvature radius and arcs of lines on the ellipsoidal
surface are possible:
M = a(1 − f )²[1 − f (2 − f ) sin ²ϕ ] = a(1 − ε ²)[1 − ε ² sin ²ϕ ]

−3 / 2 −3 / 2
N = a[1 − f (2 − f ) sin ²ϕ ] = a[1 − ε ² sin ²ϕ ]

−1 / 2 −1 / 2
r = N cos ϕ
M-13
392
Δp12 = r (λ2 − λ1 )
ϕ
B = ∫ Mdϕ = αϕ + β sin 2ϕ + γ sin 4ϕ + δ sin 6ϕ + ...
0
where (see Fig 6A.1):
M - Meridian curvature radius

N - Normal (to the meridian) section curvature radius
R - Parallel curvature radius
ϕ - Geodetic (ellipsoidal) latitude
Δp12 - Parallel are between longitudes λ1 and λ2 at ϕ latitude, (λ2 - λ1) expressed in radians
B - Meridian arc from equator to the ϕ latitude (for the first term = αϕ (alpha, phi), ϕ (phi) should
be expressed in radians)
α = a ( 1- 1/4 ε² - 3/64 ε4 - 5/256 ε6 ) = a (1-f)² (1 + 3/2 f + 33/16 f² + 85/32 f3)
β = -a ( 3/8 ε² + 3/32 ε4 + 45/1024 ε6) = -a/2(1-f)² ( 3/2 f + 3 f² + 285/64f3)
4 6
γ= a( 5/256 ε + 45/1024 ε ) = a/4(1-f)² ( 15/16 f² + 75/32 f3)
δ = -a ( 35/3072 ε6) = -a/6(1-f)² ( 35/64 f3)
Po O = N
Po R = M
N≥ M
Fig. 6A.1
The following table contains the described constants for two commonly used ellipsoids with the Q values
(meridian arc, B, from equator to the pole) added
π/2
Q = ∫
0
Mdϕ
M-13
393
ELLIPSOID MADRID 1924 WGS 84

A 6378388 m 6378137 m
F 1/297 1/298.2572236
ε² = f (2 - f) 0.0067226722 0.0066943800
α 6367654.500 m 6367449.146 m
β -16107.035 m -16038.509 m
γ + 16.976 m + 16.833 m
δ - 0.022 m - 0.022 m
Q 10002288.30 m 10001965.73 m
The mathematical form to generate a representation of the ellipsoid on the plane is:
x = x (ϕ, λ)
y = y (ϕ, λ)
and these formulae provide the properties for this transformation. For a conformal or othomorphic
representation it is necessary to replace the latitude with a new variable called "isometric latitude" or
"meridional part"
ϕ M
q= ∫0 N cos ϕdϕ
The origin of this function is the MERCATOR representation of the earth ellipsoid on the plane, starting
from a circular cylinder whose axis of orientation coincides with the semi-minor axis ‘b’ of the rotation
ellipse and the surface tangent to its respective equator (See Fig. 6A.2)
Fig. 6A.2
M-13
394
Taking the ‘y’ axis with the projection of the longitudinal origin meridian (λ = 0) on the cylinder, with y
= 0 for ϕ= 0 and the ‘x’ axis representing the equator, with x = 0 for λ = 0, it is possible to show:
x=aλ
(isometry on the tangent line = equator) but, in this case, the ‘y’ should satisfy the following differential
rate (see Fig. 6A.2)
dy dx
= =m
Mdϕ N cos ϕdλ
where m is coincident with ml given in 2.4, chapter 2. Also:
dy adλ a
= = =m
Mdϕ N cos ϕdλ N cos ϕ
and
ϕ M
y = a ∫0 dϕ = aq
N cos ϕ
solving the integral it is possible to express:
⎡⎛ 1 − ε sin ϕ ⎞ ε / 2 ⎛ π ϕ ⎞⎤
q = ln ⎢⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ tg ⎜ + ⎟⎥
⎢⎣⎝ 1 + ε sin ϕ ⎠ ⎝ 4 2 ⎠⎥⎦
Fig. 6A.3 shows a partial representation of the meridians and parallels grid and also of a geodetic line
(minimum distance track over the ellipsoidal surface) among points A and B for this transformation
(x = aλ , y = aq)
M-13
395
Fig. 6A.3
Algorithms based in these principals, but with other assumptions, are useful for nautical charting, but for
further deliberations in this annex it is sufficient to remember that:
x = aλ
y = aq
ϕ M
q= ∫0 N cos ϕ dϕ
is a conform transform of the ellipsoid to the plane, in conclusion the principals of the analytical functions
is applicable:
y + ix = f(q + i λ) (2.1)
M-13
396
(taking y to the north and x to de east) where i = (-1)1/2 and the Cauchy - Riemann conditions should be
satisfied:
∂y ∂x
=
∂q ∂λ
∂x ∂y
= −
∂q ∂λ
this is possible because q, λ and x, y are two plane co-ordinate pairs.
For a better comprehension of this subject, consultation of a mathematical text in complex variables and
their application to conform transfer between two plane domains is recommended.
The general relation 2.1, the Cauchy - Riemann conditions and the following considerations are valid for
all conformal transformations (not only for the described Mercator expressions).
Other mathematical formulae for the generic conformal representation come from differential expressions
of x = x (ϕ, λ) and y = y (ϕ, λ):
⎛ ∂x ⎞ ⎛ ∂x ⎞
dx = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟dϕ + ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟dλ
⎝ ∂ϕ ⎠ ⎝λ⎠
⎛ ∂y ⎞ ⎛ ∂y ⎞
dy = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟dϕ + ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟dλ
⎝ ∂ϕ ⎠ ⎝ ∂λ ⎠
when ϕ = constant (parallel arc), the square of the plane differential distance dx² + dy² gives, with the
correspondent ellipsoidal element (N cos ϕ dλ) the square of linear deformation rate:
2 2
⎛ ∂x ⎞ ⎛ ∂y ⎞
⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
∂λ ⎝ ∂λ ⎠
m² = ⎝ ⎠
N² cos ²ϕ
and also for λ = constant and elementary meridian arc M dφ, issues:
2 2
⎛ ∂x ⎞ ⎛ ∂y ⎞
⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
∂ϕ ⎝ ∂ϕ ⎠
m² = ⎝ ⎠
M²
M-13
397
is also valid:
2 2 2 2
⎛ ∂x ⎞ ⎛ ∂y ⎞ ⎛ ∂x ⎞ ⎛ ∂y ⎞
⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
∂ϕ ⎝ ∂ϕ ⎠ = ⎝ ∂λ ⎠ ⎝ ∂λ ⎠
m² = ⎝ ⎠
M² N² cos ²ϕ
(2.2)
Arising from the same differential expressions and taking the rates:
dx (for ϕ = constant)
dy
dy (for λ = constant)
dx
it is possible to obtain the grid declination ‘γ’ formulas (γ is the angle between the cartesian axis and the
lines of the respective meridians and parallels representation -see Fig. 6A.4)
Fig. 6A.4
M-13
398
⎛ ∂x ⎞ ⎛ ∂y ⎞
⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
∂ϕ ∂λ
tg γ = ⎝ ⎠ = ⎝ ⎠
⎛ ∂y ⎞ ⎛ ∂x ⎞
⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
⎝ ∂ϕ ⎠ ⎝ ∂λ ⎠
(2.3)
in these formulae the sign of γ (or tgγ) is not considered.
3. GAUSS-KRÜGER FORMULAS
To start in the development of conformal representation with minimum deformation upon a NORTH -
SOUTH strip, an elliptical cylinder tangent to a central meridian will be assumed (see Fig. 6A.5).
Fig. 6A.5
A more extensive representation of the meridians and parallels grid is given in Fig. 2.6 (2.5.4 Chapter 2),
but for the following consideration we start from the former Fig. 6A.5.
For this case, the 2.1 formula will be transformed as follow:
f(q + il) = y + ix
where l is the longitude referred to the central meridian:
l = λ - λ0 (2.4)
M-13
399
Adopting a Taylor series development of the function issues:
d3 f (il) d4 f (il)
3 4
df d² f (il)²
f (q + il) = f (q) + (il) + + + + ...
dq dq² 2! dq3 3! dq 4 4!
and separating the real and imaginary parts produces the generic expressions for the conformal
representation of the described strip
x = f (q) ⎛ d² f ⎞ l² ⎛ d4 f ⎞ l4
− ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + ⎜⎜ 4 ⎟⎟ + ...
⎝ dq ² ⎠2 ⎝ dq ⎠ 24
⎛ df ⎞ ⎛ d3 f ⎞ l3
y = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⋅ l + ⎜⎜ 3 ⎟⎟ + ...
⎝ dq ⎠ ⎝ dq ⎠ 6
Taking the equidistance along the central meridian (l=0) it is correct to take:
y(l = 0 ) = f (q) = B =
ϕ
∫0
Mdϕ
and then:
df
=M
dϕ
also, remembering that:
ϕ M
q= ∫
0
N cos ϕ
dϕ
it is possible to obtain:
dϕ N cos ϕ
=
dq M
and also:
⎛ df ⎞ ⎛ df ⎞⎛ dϕ ⎞
⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = N cos ϕ
⎝ dq ⎠ ⎝ dϕ ⎠⎝ dq ⎠
M-13
400
Coming from these principals it is possible to obtain the following derivates
N sin ϕ cos ϕ N sin ϕ cos 3 ϕ

y = B+
2
l² +
24
( )
5 − tg ²ϕ + 9η ² + 4η 4 ⋅ l ² + ...
N cos 3 ϕ
x = N cos ϕl + (1 − tg ²ϕ + η ² ) ⋅ l 3 + ...
6
(2.5)
Where B and N are given in the formulae at beginning of 2 (in this Annex) and η² is:
f (2 − f )
η² = ε' 2 cos ²ϕ = cos ²ϕ
1 − f (2 − f )
l is given by (2.4) and for its application in (2.5) should be expressed in radians.
With the consideration of (2.2), (2.3) and (2.4) comes also:
γ = sin ϕl + ...
cos ²ϕ (1 + η ² ) x² (2.6)
m = 1+ l ² + ... = 1 + + ...
2 2R²
Where:
a(1 − f )
R = MN =
[1 − f (2 − f ) sin ²ϕ ]
(R is the best spherical radius suitable to the ellipsoid at ϕ latitude)
For the inverse computation (to obtain ϕ, λ arising from x, y) the following formulas are useful:
tg ²ϕ1 ⎛ x ² ⎞ tg ϕ1 ⎛ x4 ⎞
ϕ = ϕ1 − ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + (5 + 3 tg ²ϕ1 + η1 − 9η1 tg ²ϕ1 )⎜⎜ 3 ⎟⎟ + ...
2 2
2 ⎝ M1N1 ⎠ 24 ⎝ M1N1 ⎠
(2.7)
3
x ⎛ 1 + 2 tg ²ϕ1 + η12 ⎞⎛ x ⎞
l = −⎜ ⎟⎟⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + ...
N1 cos ²ϕ1 ⎜⎝ 6 cos ϕ1 ⎠⎝ N1 ⎠
λ = λ0 + l
where ϕ1 is the latitude that made possible B(ϕ) = y
The representation with these algorithms was applied by GAUSS at beginning of the XIX century for the
HANNOVER Kingdom. 100 years after this, Dr. L. KRÜGER made an explanatory analysis and
M-13
401
extension of the expressions applying several strips to Germany. Also similar criteria were extended to
other countries.
With the tangent cylinder, where m = 1 by the central meridian of the strip, the zone width should be
smaller than 200 km each side because in this case the linear deformation rate (m = 1 + x²/2R² +...)
overcomes the 1.0005 value, this is 0.5 m in 1 km.
With this limitation, the use of these plane co-ordinates is very convenient for topographic charting
purposes and also for many control networks computations. For better results, a correction to the
measured elements should be made (see 2.2.5 a in Chapter 6).
4. GENERAL TRANSVERSES MERCATOR REPRESENTATIONS (See 2.5.4 and 2.5. at

Chapter 2)
The Gauss-Krüger representation, after World War 2, was also called TRANSVERSE MERCATOR and
it was utilised increasingly in many countries. For this reason, several constants and coefficients were
adopted; for N (North co-ordinate) and E (East co-ordinate) are valid:
N = Y0 + Ky
E = X 0 + Kx
and, consequently (2.8)

⎛ x² ⎞
m = K ⎜⎜1 + + ... ⎟⎟
⎝ 2R² ⎠
K is a coefficient (below 1) to reduce the linear deformation rate and allows the zone width extension (i.e.
300 km each side of central meridian), particularly for topographic charting in scales smaller than
1:100000 (1:200000 ...)
Y 0: is called FALSE NORTHING,

X 0: FALSE EASTING
K: SCALE FACTOR AT CENTRAL MERIDIAN
the application of K coefficient makes on the central meridian, it appear as a negative linear deformation,
i.e. for K = 0.9998, the ellipsoidal distances contracts 20 cm/km and the isometric lines are transferred in
two parallel lines to the described meridian image. This tangent surface is replaced by a secant elliptical
cylinder.
For the U.S. world wide Universal Transverse Mercator Grid System (UTM) the following values are
adopted:
M-13
402
K = 0.9996
Y0 = 0 or 10000000 (for North or South Hemisphere respectively)
X0= 500000 for each central meridian
and the zones are distributed at 6° longitude intervals, according to the following table
ZONE (Z) CENTRAL MERIDIAN APPLICATION RANGE

(LONGITUDE) (LONGITUDE)
31 3° 0° to 6
32 9° 6° to 12°
. . .
. . .
. . .
50 117° 114° to 120°
. . .
. . .
. . .
60 177° 174° to 180°
1 183° (-177°) 180° to 186° (-174°)
. . .
. . .
. . .
20 297°(-63°) 294° (-66°)to 300° (-60°)
. . .
. . .
. . .
29 351° (-9°) 348° (-12°) to 354° (-6°)
30 357° (-3°) 354° (-6°) to 0°
The Zone number (Z) may be computed starting from the central meridian longitude with the following
formulae:
CM + 3 (East Hemisphere)
Z = 30 +
6
183 + CM
Z = (West Hemisphere)
6
in the second formula (West), the negative value of the longitude (of the central meridian) should be
taken.
There are many software programs to solve the calculation of Transverse Mercator transformation, with
the algorithms described in 3 and 4. of this Annex, or other alternative mode. However it is desirable to
have good subject knowledge of the nature of the linear deformation rate.
M-13
403
In many cases it is suitable to select the general Transverse Mercator scheme adopted for the country
representation but in particular cases there are chances to select the better plane representation procedure.
For this purpose, it is important to remember that the Transverse Mercator representation is particularly
suitable for application in a North - South strip, where the West - East width is less than 400 km (200 km
to each side of the central meridian).
After the selection of the central meridian, taking into account the reduction of any distance for the
selected area to this line, there is still the possibility of choosing a K coefficient (see formulas 2.8) for a
better linear deformation rates distribution in the whole representation domain.
For topographic purposes, included coastal delineation, aids to navigation positioning, inshore feature
descriptions and special harbour surveys, a linear deformation rate under 0.2m/km is better; this is ‘m’
values between 0.9998 and 1.0002.
__________
M-13
404
M-13
405
CHAPTER 6 - ANNEX B
(COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT EXAMPLES)
1. INTRODUCTION
In this Annex, is list of addresses, telephone numbers and web sites of some of the providers of
equipment used in topographic and remote imagery surveying. However the analysis of commercial
booklets or web pages is the recommended way of keeping abreast of the available technology, price
information and future product launches.
In ground survey systems, there is a wide diversity of total stations (a combination of theodolite, distance
measurement, data storage and computing) available, also of self aligning levels with digital reading of
bar coded stadia and processing software. In photogrammetric data acquisition equipment there is a wide
choice of cameras, both analogue, digital and including GNSS positioning, films, scanners,
stereoplotters, image stations and specific software for digital processing and orthophoto elaboration. The
Geospatial media gives a lot of possibility for product elaboration and access to images and image
products through WEB servers.
2. ADDRESSES AND WEB PAGES
Below is a list set of companies or institutions that provide equipment, products and services related to
the subjects covered in the CHAPTER 6, it is by no means exhaustive and it is hoped that in future
versions of this manual a more comprehensive directory may be created.
INSTITUTION EQUIPMENT, ADDRESS/COUNTRY WEB SITE

NAME PRODUCTS or E-MAIL
OR SERVICES
AGFA GEVAERT Photogrammetric Films B-2640 Mortsel www.agfa.com
BELGIUM
ANEBA, Topographic software Nicaragua 48. 2°, 6° www.aneba.com
Geoinformatica (CARTOMAP) 08029 - Barcelona
SPAIN
ASAHI PRECISION Theodolites, Levels, 2-5-2 Higashi Oizumi www.pentax.co.jp
Total Stations (Pentax) Nerima-ku, Tokyo JAPAN
CLARK LABS Cartographic Software, Clark University 950 Main http://www.clarklabs.org
GIS (IDRISI) Street
Worcester, MA 01610-
1477
USA
EARTH imagery products and 4370 La Jolla Village www.ermapper.com
RESOURCE software for GIS Drive suite 900 San Diego www.earthetc.com
MAPPING database CA USA
(ERMAPPER)
ERDAS Images Processing USA www.esdas.com
software
ESRI GIS (ArcInfo, ArcView) USA www.esri.com
info@esri.com
M-13
406

OR SERVICES
EURIMAGE Imagery Products Viale e. D’Onofrio 212,
00155 Rome, Italy
GARMIN Int. GPS Navigators 1200E 151 st., Street www.garmin.com
Olathe, KS 66062 – USA
GEOMATECH Geomatics, GIS and 2, rue Philippe Lebon, BP geomatech@wanadoo.fr
cartography services and 102, 44612, Saint Nazaire,
assistance FRANCE
GODDARD SPACE Remote Sensing USA http://www.gsfc.nasa-gov
FLIGHT CENTER Assistance
Hewlett-Packard Hardware USA www.hp.com
Institute Cartografic Cartographic, Parc de Montjuic s/n, www.icc.es
de Catalunya geomatics, 08038 Barcelona, España
photogrammetric and
remote sensing services
INTERGRAPH Soft/Hardware and P.O. Box 6695 http://imgs.intergraph.com
CORPORATION images for Cartographic Mailstop MD IW17A2 www.intergraph.com
processing Huntsville Al 35894-6695
USA
ISM Europe S.A. Photogrammetric Passeig de Fabra i Piug sales@ismeurope.com
software and hardware, 46, 08030, Barcelona, www.ismeurope.com
and services. ESPAÑA
ITC Photogrammetric and Hengelostraat 99 www.itc.nl
Cartographic assistance P.O BOX 6 ilwis@itc.nl
THE NETHERLANDS
KODAK, GR-OUPE Films for Hant Monts Inc www.kodak.com
ALTA Photogrammetry GIS, 3645, Boulevard Sainte- www.mb-gepair.com
Cartography, Remote Anne Beauport (Quebec) www.groupealta.com
processing CANADA G1E3L1
LEICA Total Stations Levels, CH.9425 Heerbrugg www.leica-
GEOSISTEMS AC Theodolites, GNSS, SWITZERLAND geosistems.com
Photogramm. Cameras,
Stereo plotters, Scanners
MAPINFO Software for USA www.mapinfo.com

Cartography,
Photogrammetry and
GIS
MicroImage, Inc Software, Image 11th. Floor, The Sharp www.microimages.com
processing Tower
TNT MIPS software 206 south 13th street
Lincoln. NE
68508-2010 USA
OMNISTAR, INC. Worldwide (satellite 8200 Westglen Dr. www.omnistar.com
based) DGPS Service 77063-Houston, TX USA
PCI GEOMATICS Software for 50 west Wilmon Street, www.pci.on.ca
cartography and GIS Richmond Hill, Ontario sales@pci.on.ca
CANADA L4B1M5
M-13
407

OR SERVICES
P.GEERDERS Marine and coastal Kobaltpad 18, 3402 JL, pgcons@wxs.nl
Consultancy remote sensing Ijsselstein, plaza.wxs.nl/pgconsult/
applications services THE NETHERLANDS
RADARSAT Images and Image CANADA www.rsi.ca
International Products.
RESEARCH ENVI Software USA www.rsinc.com
SYSTEMS
SITEM S.L. Photography and Aragó 141-143, 08015 www.sitem-
satellite image Barcelona, ESPAÑA consulting.com
processing, Digital
Elevation Models
cartography
SOKKIA CO.LTD. Total Stations Level, 20-28, ASAHICHO 3-C www.sokkia.co.jp
Theodolites HOME,
MACHIDA,TOKIO,194-
0023 JAPAN
SPOT Image Remote Sensing Images, FRANCE http://www.spotimage.co
Products, etc. m
THALES GNSS 471 El Camino Real Santa www.ashtech.com
NAVIGATION (ASHTECHMAGUELL Clara, CA 950050 – USA
AN)
TRIMBLE GNSS, Total Stations, 645 North Mary Ave. www.trimble.com
NAVIGATION Theodolites, Levels, Sunnyvale, CA 94088-
geodetic and topo- 3642 USA
cartographic software
XYZ Sistemas Cartographic and data Av. Infantes 105, 39005 www.imapper.com
Industriales S.A. base handling for their Santander, Cantabria.
use with Internet ESPAÑA
Mapper application
Z/I Imaging Cameras, Scanners, 301 Chochran Road, Suite www.ziimaging.com
Corporation Stereo-plotters, GIS 9 Huntsville AL USA
35824
__________
M-13
408
M-13
409
CHAPTER 7
HYDROGRAPHIC PRACTICE
1. INTRODUCTION
The execution of a surveying operation, from its inception to the final submission of the results, is a
continuous process, all parts of which must be methodically and meticulously carried out if full value is to
be gained from it. The most accurate and carefully gathered data will be wasted if not processed carefully
and collated and rendered in a clear and understandable manner.
All information must be gathered, validated, checked and rendered in a logical and uniform manner using
clear unambiguous terms so that the data may be recovered and understood both immediately after the
survey and in the future.
The use of sophisticated computer systems and instrumentation in all areas has not lessened the
surveyor’s responsibility. The need for rigorous quality management is as essential now as ever, but
made the more difficult by the rapidly increasing volume and complexity of data gathered. The surveyor
must understand the principles of the equipment he controls, be meticulous in ensuring that any data input
are entirely correct and examine with care the data output before they are passed to the next stage. Only
by these means will the data rendered be of the highest quality and be able to fulfil its needs until the task
can be repeated perhaps decades, if not centuries, later.
There is no substitute for practical experience where theoretical knowledge can be turned into practical
skills; time spent in the field gathering data under the guidance of an experienced hydrographic surveyor
will highlight the many difficulties and complex problems that need to be overcome to ensure the final
product meets the initial requirement. The use and applications, to which highly complex sophisticated
equipment can be best applied, can only be learnt whilst involved in the practical tasks of a hydrographic
survey.
The processes are discussed in more detail in the following sections. The points covered are not
exhaustive, and the surveyor must use his judgement and experience to expand or contract the list as
considered appropriate. This chapter will consider general principles applicable to any survey.
2. HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY PLANNING
As will be seen, survey planning is a complex process requiring considerable attention to detail, a flexible
approach, good management and effective decision-making. If the planning is thorough, the chances are
that the survey will be good too.
2.1 The Hydrographic Project
Survey planning is the term used to cover the whole process of the development of a hydrographic project
from its inception, its subsequent issue to a designated unit, the detailed planning within that unit of how
to conduct the survey, and the final submission of data to the Hydrographic Office.
Survey planning must, therefore, involve a coherent procedure which will consist of the following stages:
a. survey requirement.
b. preparation of a hydrographic survey specification. (To include a review of existing data.)
M-13
410
c. issue to a designated unit.

d. programme planning of that unit.
e. assessment of the task within that unit.
f. reconnaissance requirements.
g. resource allocation.
h. detailed survey planning.
i. estimation of time required.
j. final programme planning and approval.
k. liaison with outside authorities.
l. administration planning.
m. daily planning.
n. plans for compilation and checking of data.
o. plans for rendering of data.
The development of the survey requirement varies greatly from country to country. The final survey
specification is assigned to a designated survey unit which has responsibility for the remaining planning
requirements. A ‘designated unit’ might be a government-surveying vessel, an independent survey party
working either in a chartered vessel or using boats, or a commercial company working under contract.
Each nation will have its own planning process.
2.2 Assessment of the Survey Task
Before detailed planning can take place, the surveyor must be very clear about the aim of the survey, and
who will be the primary user of the information. In general every survey should cover the immediate
needs of the user as well as benefiting others.
Having studied the survey requirement, accompanying data and graphics of the area to be surveyed, the
surveyor must first decide whether any additional data is required and propose any changes he considers
necessary to the survey task.
Once all the basic data is held and the limits and scale of the survey have been fixed, the main surveying
tasks can be established. The specifications for the survey will be stated directly in the survey job
specification, key amongst these should be the specified Order of the survey as defined IHO Publication
S-44.
The main task assessment points are as follows:
a. establishment of geodetic control;

b. method of positional control and calibration of navaids;
c. sounding criteria including interlining policy;
d. sonar search category;
e. tidal datum and observations;
f. wrecks and obstructions;
g. seabed sampling;
h. oceanographic observations;
i. tidal stream observations;
j. geophysical observations;
k. coastline and topography;
l. lights and buoys;
M-13
411
m. sailing directions and views;

n. radio Signals;
o. ancillary observations (vertical photography, overfalls, measured distances, leading lines,
shore magnetics, natural phenomena, etc);
p. passage observations.
Existing Data. The surveyor should be provided with copies of the largest scale published chart and all
previous surveys to survey scale, together with their Reports of Survey (RoS). These should be studied
carefully, together with the relevant sections of tidal data, sailing directions, aerial photographs and
topographic maps.
Resource Allocation. From the list of points in 2.2.5, and a study of previous data, the size of the task
can be assessed. Detailed planning will take place after this process, but the initial study will reveal what
resources are required to meet the task. The following list shows some of the considerations that should
be made when planning resources:
• Weather predictions and sea state. These will affect the size of the vessel to be used for the
task and the ability to use boats for inshore work and examinations.
• Size of the shallow water area. This will dictate how much boatwork is required. If boats are
necessary, the time taken to complete the task will be highly dependent on sea state; 2.2.7.1
and 2 should, therefore, be considered together.
• Use of helicopters. It may be that the unit has a helicopter available, but if not is one required
for access to remote sites?
• Logistics. The endurance of the surveyor’s own resources will dictate fuel, water and stores
requirements. Maintenance of equipment is another consideration.
• Manpower. The number and specialisation of personnel required to meet each task must be
assessed. The following factors are also relevant: changes of personnel; mail and
communications; leave and recreation; medical facilities ashore and afloat; shore support and
transport; shore accommodation and monetary arrangements.
• Topography. This will dictate the resources required to access sites ashore.
• Detached Boat Camps - A detached boat camp may be ordered by survey specification in
which case the planning list above should be followed. However, consideration should be
given to detaching a boat to conduct inshore work and shoal investigations if a suitable
harbour or sheltered mooring exists. Time spent lowering and hoisting boats is unproductive.
Likely constraints on the conduct of the survey should also be investigated. Investigate what fishing
activity is likely to affect survey progress together with the constraints imposed by danger, firing and
practice areas, shipping lanes and marine traffic choke points.
A field reconnaissance may be required to expedite the survey. See Section 3
M-13
412
2.3 Detailed Survey Planning
Once the size and scope of the task has been assessed and the necessary resources required to conduct it
decided upon, detailed survey planning can begin. A number of activities can be planned to run in
parallel and a good surveyor will try to reduce the overall time required to achieve the aim. A
comprehensive list of required actions is given in the following paragraphs, but it must be remembered
that every survey will be different and additional items may have to be inserted, or listed ones deleted.
2.4 Horizontal Control
The survey specification will detail the horizontal reference for the survey and list details of existing co-
ordinated geodetic stations together with their descriptions if held:
Decide how best to achieve the accuracy standards of horizontal control set out in survey specifications.
The survey specification will detail the choice of navaid, more than one may be ordered. In rare cases, it
may not be possible to achieve the stated standards with the navaids available and relaxations may have to
be sought from the Hydrographic Office.
Once the choice of navaids has been determined, their sites need to be chosen. Use whatever network
analysis systems are available. Decide how best to co-ordinate new stations. Consider access to sites and
any reconnaissance requirement. Decide how to power navaids and work out how often site
replenishment will be required. Note the authorities that must be approached for permission to use the
chosen sites, authorise frequency clearance and land boats and helicopters. This will include sites for
shore marks if visual fixing methods are to be employed.
Decide on how and where the chosen navaids will be calibrated and whether re-calibration will be
necessary during the course of the survey.
Most modern surveys use some form of GPS for control ashore and afloat. Where DGPS is used for
control afloat it must be validated. In remote locations ashore, point positioning within 20cms should be
achievable within 24 hours of data capture if data can be transmitted to the Hydrographic Office for
comparison with the nearest ITRF monitoring site. Otherwise establishing a new station will require
connection to an existing network.
2.5 Vertical control
The survey specification will detail the datum to which soundings are to be reduced and its relation to
existing land datums, a list of any existing benchmarks should also be provided. The following planning
points should be considered:
Decide where to observe tidal heights if not ordered in the survey specification. Decide on the siting of
additional poles and gauges if required and plan the laying and recovery of offshore gauges if appropriate.
Ensure that gauge and pole sites do not dry out at low water, plan additional gauges and poles if this is
unavoidable.
Decide how best to establish chart datum on the pole/gauge from existing benchmarks or from transfer of
datum or observation and analysis. Plan to connect a newly established datum to a land based levelling
system if applicable.
M-13
413
Establish the nature of the tide and expected ranges, and the affect this will have on fieldwork. Where
there is a possibility of tide poles or gauges drying out an additional pole or gauges should be planned to
allow tidal data to be recorded throughout the survey.
Decide whether co-tidal adjustments will be necessary. If they are, determine the tidal factors from tide
tables and the appropriate co-tidal chart, or locally produce them from the best data available. Seek
advice from the Hydrographic Office if necessary.
2.6 Tidal Streams
Establish the expected maximum rate and direction of tidal stream within the survey area.
Determine the requirement for full tidal stream observations and how online observations can be
conducted.
Identify charted overfalls, eddies and freshwater springs and plan to observe them.
2.7 Sounding
The following general considerations should be taken into account when conducting initial planning:
By examining the largest scale charts of survey area and previous surveys locate all critical or controlling
depths and prepare sounding comparison overlay.
Plan main survey line spacing, direction and sounding speed. For SBES, where possible, lines should be
perpendicular to general direction of contours.
Plan cross line direction, normally at right angles to main sonar and sound line direction, and plan to run
these at the start of the survey as a crucial quality control measure.
Estimate likely spatial or temporal changes in sound velocity regime and plan initial sound velocity probe
coverage.
Estimate sounding error budget and compare to the survey specification.
Vessel speed is to be assessed for the expected range of depths in the survey area and the type of echo
sounder in use. Compare vessel speed with speed required for towing sonar to determine optimum and
maximum survey speed.
During the planning of sonar and sounding lines, a list of all planned lines should be kept.
For SBES surveys additional lines should be considered inside the 10m contour. Additional lines should
be run parallel to a jetty or wharf.
Lines of sounding should be planned and run along recommended tracks, leading lines, in possible
anchorages and off headlands passed close to hand by vessels on normal passage.
M-13
414
If using SBES for offshore surveys particular attention should be paid to the sounding of depths <40m,
where the least depth should be obtained over all seabed features. Interlines should be run in depths
<40m unless the seabed is flat and featureless and no dangers are shown to exist by complete coverage by
high definition towed side scan sonar. A full explanation should be given in the RoS when areas <40m
are not interlined.
2.8 Side Scan Sonar
The following general considerations should be taken into account when conducting initial planning:
Tidal stream will have a significant influence over sonar line direction when using towed systems, often a
compromise will need to be reached between the best sounding and sonar line directions. In some cases
bathymetric and sonar data will have to be gathered separately.
Inspect the Wreck List supplied with the survey specification data and identify those with positions listed
as approximate and thus requiring disproving searches or special attention. The limit of the area of this
search may extend outside the given limits of the stated survey area. See IHO Publication S-44 Chapter
6.
Plot Wreck List information, other dangers and depth contours on planned track plots.
When surveying in or near oilfields or exploration areas careful note is to be taken of 500 metre safety
zones, seabed installations and possible pipelaying operations to ensure the safety of the sonar towfish.
Sonar lines should be planned to run within 20 degrees of the prevailing tidal stream or current. In areas
of strong tidal flow, a direction much less than 20 degrees may have to be adopted to ensure that the sonar
towfish follows the ship’s track closely.
The sonar line spacing should be planned in accordance with the survey requirements.
Ensure that any disproving search areas lying on the outer edge of the survey area are covered. Additional
lines are to be planned to run outside the area in order to ensure complete ensonification of the area, with
appropriate overlap.
Whenever a survey includes a channel, recommended track or leading line in restricted waters it should
be swept by sonar. When planning such sweeps allowance should be made to accommodate the largest
vessels likely to use these tracks paying particular attention to turning areas and where a track changes
course.
2.9 Seabed Sampling
Seabed samples should be obtained as required throughout the entire survey area. See IHO Publication
S-44 4.1.
The survey specification may require the retention of a percentage of all samples obtained. Due
allowance should be made for this requirement.
M-13
415
2.10 Coastline Delineation, Conspicuous Objects and Topography
The requirement for mapping of the coastline and other topography will be defined in the survey
specification.
The High Water line shown on maps cannot always be relied upon as the coastline for hydrographic
surveys.
Using charts and any photo plots supplied with the survey specification, identify those areas adequately
covered and those requiring additional work. Where no modern charts, maps or air photo plots exist, all
coastline and topographic detail which will be of use to the mariner should be fixed accurately.
The surveyor should attempt to obtain copies of any relevant local modern charts, maps and geodetic data
additional to those supplied with the survey specification. Any such data should be rendered to the
Hydrographic Office at the end of the survey.
Determine the means of delineating inadequate areas and identify equipment to be used to define such
areas appropriate to the scale of the survey.
2.11 Ancillary Observations
Geophysical Observations The survey specification should detail which geophysical observations are
required, but generally magnetic and gravity observations can be taken concurrently with bathymetry.
The survey specification will cover line spacing in detail. If magnetic anomalies are charted, plan to
observe and report them. Plan magnetic observations ashore if ordered in the survey specification.
Lights and Buoys
Establish which lights should be visible from the survey ground and plan to check their characteristics.
Establish the number of buoys that require to be fixed.
Air Photography If air photography is ordered, then plan to fly it during advantageous tidal and weather
conditions. The subsequent photographs may be used for coastlining and topography.
Sailing Directions and Views The amendments to Sailing Directions can normally be compiled during
the course of the survey and additional time to observe information for inclusion should not be required.
Plan to check all existing photographic views and to photograph new ones as ordered in the survey
specification. Plan to check harbour facilities and the facilities for small craft.
Radio Stations Plan to check the accuracy of published data.
Jetties, Wharves and Landing Stages Plan to check the details of jetties, wharves and landing stages.
This can normally be done during boat sounding operations.
2.12 Surveying Team Organization
The senior surveyor will normally prepare a Survey Order Book which will give an overall plan, stating
how the survey is to be tackled, and detailing responsibilities for planning and execution of the work.
These orders should be updated regularly to inform the whole team of the short term priorities and to give
the framework within which more detailed day-to-day planning can be made. When both the ship and her
M-13
416
survey boats are working together on a daily basis the activity becomes particularly intensive and
complicated. It will then be vital to have a flexible and well thought out plan to co-ordinate times of boat
lowering/hoisting, change of boat’s crews, provision of victuals, and instructions for those in charge of
boat work.
Shortage of manpower will always be a problem at the start of the survey, with observing and tidal parties
away simultaneously and boats crews and shore parties on standby to land navaids etc. Good shore
transport and/or helicopters will greatly assist the successful start of a survey.
The Bridge and Chartroom organisations require careful planning and structuring ensuring that the data is
acquired and handled in the most efficient manner.
The pressure on all surveying units for increased productivity is considerable. Good management and
planning as well as positive leadership is fundamental to the success of the survey.
2.13 Compilation and Checking of Data
Quality Control should be built into the plan at every stage, with nominated checkers of all data required
to keep abreast of the incoming work.
Plan the allocation of drawing and compilation tasks. Ensure that accompanying fair records are
compiled and checked as the survey progresses.
In a large survey, it is generally better to complete one area in all respects before moving to the next.
This will ensure that complete data can be rendered should the unit be withdrawn from the survey for
some over-riding reason.
It may be convenient to allocate the writing of separate sections and annexes of the Report of Survey to
individuals.
All transcripts and records should be compiled as the survey progresses and not left until afterwards if at
all possible.
The comparison of surveyed data with previous surveys is a most important consideration; it should
proceed with the fieldwork and the planning should take account of additional investigation and
disproving searches that may arise from differences between charted and surveyed data.
2.14 Data Rendering Requirements
The data required to be rendered to the Hydrographic office will vary greatly depending on national
policy and requirements. In general it will include:
a. bathymetric data set in digital or graphic (Fair Sheet) format;

b. navigational track data in digital or graphic format;
c. sonar data set in digital or graphic format;
d. seabed texture data set in digital or graphic format;
e. report of survey.
M-13
417
Hydrographic Offices should appraise all the survey data rendered and dispatch a critique within two
months of rendering the data. Points raised from the Hydrographic Office should be answered as quickly
as possible while the survey is still fresh in the mind.
2.15 Operation programme Development
The total number of planned days taken to complete a survey must now be fitted into the requirements for
port calls, vessel maintenance, passage time, exercises etc. Each vessel will have its own operating cycle and
from this skeleton a work cycle can be fleshed out and passed for approval if necessary. If the estimation of
time required shows that the survey cannot be conducted within the broad timescale allotted in the survey
specification the matter must be represented for programme modification or reduction of the size of the
survey task.
2.16 Operation Duration and Cost Estimates
There are no hard and fast rules for arriving at a precise time required for completing a survey. An
experienced surveyor can sum up the requirement after studying the survey specification and arrive at a
good estimate without recourse to a mathematical sum. However, the format provided at Appendix 1 to
this chapter will provide a reasonable answer and can be adjusted to suit the needs of any survey. During
the detailed planning stage the surveyor should maintain a tote of line mileage, numbers of wrecks,
numbers of bottom samples required etc. This data can then be used to compile the time required format.
2.17 Liaison with Outside Authorities
As soon as the survey specification is received, letters should be sent to a number of outside authorities
giving the broad details of the survey specification and the timescale of the survey, together with a request
to use facilities if appropriate. This can be followed by further letters with more detail once the detailed
planning has been conducted, if considered necessary. A list of examples is shown below. Survey
specifications are often sent to a number of agencies direct from the Hydrographic Office, and the survey
specification covering letter should indicate those organisations that have already been informed:
a. fishing authorities;
b. local landowners;
c. coastguards;
d. lighthouse authorities;
e. local defence forces;
f. firing or exercise range operating authorities;
g. oilfield operating authorities;
h. local government representatives;
i. naval attachés;
j. local chart/land survey departments;
k. helicopter operating authorities;
l. religious authorities.
In addition, if a detached boat party is to be landed or shore parties are to be landed from sea or operate
from a local port or settlement, the following should also be considered:
a. local police;
b. Mayor, Town Chief or Headman;
c. harbour authorities;
d. local Service establishments.
M-13
418
Follow up visits may need to be made during either the advanced survey reconnaissance or on arrival.
Security implications should always be considered.
3. SURVEY RECONNAISSANCE
3.1 General Reconnaissance
Reconnaissance is needed prior to any survey to acquire the necessary data to permit the best and most
economical survey to be carried out. The information collected should cater for the design, planning,
organisation and observations of the proposed task. The reconnaissance may be carried out immediately
before the survey, or many months in advance.
The reconnaissance is important; a bad one can result in wasted time and effort later, when much more
expensive assets are likely to be involved. It should also be complete because a poor reconnaissance will
inevitably result in a poor plan.
The surveyor called upon to do the reconnaissance should possess experience, commonsense, a sound
knowledge of all equipment available, and have no preconceived ideas about the method by which the task
will be carried out. The actual observations can safely be left to less experienced surveyors once the major
decisions have been taken.
3.2 The Geodetic Reconnaissance
The purposes of the reconnaissance can be summarised as follows:
a. establish local contacts in person;

b. visit all proposed stations - select actual sites. Recover existing control stations;
c. confirm inter-visibilities;
d. decide upon final network design (re-analyse if necessary);
e. permanently mark geodetic stations;
f. describe geodetic stations;
g. prove the proposed observing plan (instruments/targets required). Prepare detailed observing
programme;
h. prove the administrative plan for the main survey, amend as necessary.
For each new geodetic station, the following information will be required:
a. accessibility by road, rail, boat, foot or helicopter. Time for access (e.g. on foot from road) and
recommended route;
b. visibility from station and requirements for any subsequent clearing;
c. description of the station, magnetic bearings to other visible stations;
d. photographs of the station, surroundings, and panoramic photos from the station;
e. local factors, customs etc;
f. likely visibility and meteorological conditions.
M-13
419
3.3 The Tidal Reconnaissance
Whenever possible it is advisable to use established or previously used tide stations for commonality of data.
When selecting a site for a tide gauge and tide pole the following must be considered:
• Ease of Erection Consider which is the easiest place to erect a tide pole and gauge, some places
are easier than others, and some places are impossible;
• The Station Must Not Dry Out. The zero of the Tide Pole and Tide Gauge pressure sensor should
not dry out. If this is unavoidable a secondary pole and gauge should be established below the
level of the first gauge or pole;
• Ease of Reading. The pole or gauge must be sited such that it can be read at all times;
• Security. Avoid situations where the tide pole and particularly the tide gauge will be likely to be
interfered with by the public, e.g. Fishing boats berthing;
• Shelter. The pole or gauge sensor should be sited away from the more severe effects of weather
sea and swell;
• Protection. Ideally the tide gauge recorder should be placed in a lockable building;
• Impounded Water. Water that is restricted in movement by a sandbar or basin will not be at the
same level as the open sea. Therefore a station should be selected that reflects the true level of
the sea at the survey area;
• Proximity of Bench Marks. Select a station near to two benchmarks if possible, to avoid time
spent on long levelling runs;
• Accessibility. If a tide watcher is employed, accommodation should be close at hand. If a

detached Boat Party is in operation the tide station should be close to where the boat is moored,
or close to the tide party base.
4. DATA ACQUISITION
The depths shown on a nautical chart are its most important feature and the mariner must be able to rely
implicitly on accurate bathymetry to avoid danger. The greatest care must be taken to ensure that
soundings are precisely positioned. An error in position is often more misleading than an error in depth,
for a mariner is more likely to navigate clear of a charted danger than to rely on the accuracy of its
charted depth and deliberately navigate over it.
The disciplines of sounding error monitoring, data checking and Quality Control (QC) are continuous
procedures that need to be sustained throughout the entire hydrographic surveying process. Similarly the
generation of the final report should commence on completion of the planning stage and be uninterrupted
during the remaining phases of the survey; it should not be left until the end when all data acquisition has
been completed.
M-13
420
4.1 Horizontal Control and Calibration
4.1.1 Introduction
The Hydrographic Specification will detail the horizontal datum to be used during the survey; if, after the
planning and reconnaissance (paragraph 2.4), there are insufficient co-ordinated geodetic stations,
secondary stations, landmark and navaids then additional horizontal control should be generated within
the area and sub-areas to meet the required accuracies for positioning at sea.
The methods selected for providing control offshore will dictate to a great extent the preparatory work
required onshore. Numerous shore stations may be needed for visual fixing in surveys of small areas
close inshore, whereas only two stations may be required for surveys controlled by local area DGPS. In
either case, the stations should be as close to the high water line as possible to avoid inaccuracies in the
electromagnetic patterns caused by variable propagation conditions over land paths.
Satellite position fixing is capable of achieving great accuracies with GPS Relative Positioning
Techniques – code phase Differential GPS (DGPS) and Real Time Kinematic (RTK) carrier phase DGPS
– with only one GPS reference station, which gives greater flexibility on site selection and deployment
than is the case with terrestrial methods. DGPS corrections can be obtained from Radio Beacon
Navigation Service (Beacon-IALA) and a variety of WAAS (Wide Area Augmentation Systems) via
commercial services (Landstar, Seastar, Omnistar, Skyfix etc.) and free service (EGNOS); these systems
provide good accuracies in positioning without the need for a reference station onshore, however GPS
receiver calibrations and real time checks on geometry (GDOP) should be conducted during the survey.
4.1.2 Horizontal Control Ashore
Control for offshore surveys can usually be generated by extending the established geodetic network in
the vicinity. Failing this it will be necessary to determine a datum position, azimuth and scale to allow
the new stations to be fixed relative to each other.
Conventional land surveying techniques should be employed, these are summarized below, detailed
explanations can be found in Chapter 2 with reference texts listed in the bibliography:
a. the determination of absolute position of a datum point (A);

b. the orientation of the network by azimuth observations (at A to B);
c. the determination of scale by baseline measurement (from A to B);
d. the extension of the network by traverse, triangulation or trilateration to the required stations,
with intermediate stations fixed by resection or intersection.
Operations a., b. and c. will be required only where no established geodetic network exists. This is rarely
necessary; the techniques for astronomical or satellite GPS observations ashore, performed for geodetic
surveys, are beyond the scope of this manual.
Angular observations are made by theodolite or sextant with distance measured by mechanical, optical or
electromagnetic (EDM) means or both by Total Stations. Subsequent computations may be carried out on
the reference spheroid in terms of latitude and longitude, or on the grid and projection in rectangular co-
ordinates using plane trigonometry.
GPS observations, carried out using geodetic dual frequency receivers or by RTK DGPS technique, can
produce better accuracies in the determination of a baseline (see paragraph 6.1 Chapter 2), however it
should be remembered that the position co-ordinates obtained are referred to the WGS 84 ellipsoid and a
M-13
421
compatible grid and projection. Datum transformation from WGS 84 must be performed (see paragraph
2.2.3 Chapter 2), if the hydrographic survey is to be conducted in a local horizontal and vertical datum.
The positional accuracies of marks for primary shore control points and secondary stations are specified
in IHO S-44.
4.1.3 Horizontal Control at Sea
General Description of Positioning Systems
Terrestrial positioning methods include traditional land-based techniques such as:
a. sextant resection positioning;

b. triangulation/intersection positioning;
c. visual positioning methods;
d. tag line positioning methods;
e. range-azimuth positioning methods;
f. land based electronic positioning systems.
Since the early 1990's most of these terrestrial positioning methods have been largely replaced by
satellite-based positioning systems, namely GPS and more accurate code phase Differential GPS (DGPS)
and Real Time Kinematic (RTK) carrier phase DGPS. Within isolated project areas, where satellite GPS
methods may be inaccessible or impractical, one of the traditional terrestrial survey techniques may be
needed to provide survey control. Examples of such cases may include:
a. small dredging or marine construction projects where only a limited amount of depth
coverage is required;
b. areas under bridges, in deep-draft harbour berths or near dams where GPS satellite view is
masked;
c. intermittent, low-budget projects where traditional terrestrial positioning techniques may
prove more economical than equipping a fully automated DGPS-based hydrographic survey
system;
d. quick reconnaissance surveys, where meeting a specific positional accuracy standard is not
required.
Procedural methods and Quality Control (QC) criteria for some of these terrestrial survey techniques are
detailed in this manual primarily for reference purposes.
Horizontal Positional Accuracy
All the positioning methods, summarized at Appendix 2 in Table 7.1 “Horizontal Positioning Systems
and Selection Criteria”, are capable of meeting the required minimum standards of horizontal accuracy
for a selected survey Order, detailed in IHO S-44, provided that distances from the shore-based reference
point and the vessel are within normal system operating limits. The operating limits vary with the type of
positioning system, procedures employed and the environment in which it is being used. In general, the
positional accuracy of all systems will degrade as a function of distance from the baseline reference
points, some faster than others. Users must fully assess and evaluate the resultant accuracy of any
positioning method, including DGPS, to ensure its suitability for the survey to be undertaken.
M-13
422
Selection of Positioning Systems
The accuracies predicted for positioning systems employed in hydrography are generally quoted with
reference to normal use of the equipment within their operational limits and the different classes of
surveys. Table 7.1 shows the criteria for selection and employment against the orders of hydrographic
surveys, as defined in the IHO S-44, for positioning systems with their anticipated positional accuracy.
Suitability of a particular technique for a survey should be guided by the tasking authority taking these
limitations into account. The Table assumes a standard project area located within 25 miles of the
coastline or shoreline reference point (horizontal control) or up to 200 meters water depth. Criteria for
performing surveys within these ranges should conform to the standards contained in IHO S-44 and in
this Manual.
Generalised accuracy ranges achievable with each type of system are also shown in this and other
manuals, including operators’ equipment manuals; the extreme variations are a result of factors discussed
elsewhere in this manual and relevant chapters of the above mentioned equipment manuals. The
indicated maximum accuracy range is generally that which could be expected with the equipment being
employed within its normal operating limits and conditions. In some cases the accuracy range covers
those prescribed for Special, 1st and 2nd Order surveys; this indicates that project-dependent factors
(geometry, distance offshore, etc.) must be considered in order to select the most appropriate equipment
for a particular order of survey or project site.
Track Control
The methods highlighted in paragraph 4.1.3.2 will prove the surveyor with a position at sea, in addition,
he must ensure that his vessel follows the desired track over the seabed making correct allowance for
effects of tidal steams, currents and wind drift and therefore thought must be given to this requirement
when planning positional control. The chosen fixing method will often also provide track information,
such as a left/right indicator displayed on a device of positioning system or on the monitor of special
HW/SW automated data acquisition and control, however, particularly in close range work,
supplementary aids must sometimes be provided for the steering of the vessel.
In traditional visual methods or old EPS techniques, a real time plot of the vessel’s track is kept manually
or by a track plotter with the survey data superimposed after reduction in the post processing stage. In
this case plotting sheets should be prepared with collector overlays to be used to generate a running
record of survey progress.
Whatever method is employed, it will have an impact on the planning and execution of survey and must
be considerer within the overall plan from the outset.
4.1.4 Field Preparation
General Description
A field reconnaissance of the survey area will save considerable time during the data gathering stage of
the task. The positions selected for survey marks should be visited, their suitability confirmed and
descriptions written. Once the survey team arrives on site, equipment will need to be installed ashore and
in the vessel, all of which may require field calibration and checking.
Working within the “strategic” framework drawn up at the Hydrographic Office, the surveyor-in-charge
must refine the plan and if necessary review the deployment of personnel and equipment for optimum
utilisation within the overall project. Any adjustments to the initially agreed plan should be discussed
M-13
423
with the Hydrographic Office and suitable methods for monitoring progress and achievement of key mile
stones should be put in place.
Observation Planning
The greatest care should always be taken when observing the framework of the geodetic system, every
opportunity taken to obtain checks on the observations and to detect weakness in observing techniques,
observers and equipment. All calculations must be completed and very fully checked before proceeding
with the fieldwork dependent on the accuracy of co-ordinates derived from such primary observations.
The surveyor should identify the optimum observing periods, using a mission planning program, to achieve
the order of standard for the survey. Instrument selection should be such that observations of the appropriate
type and standard are obtained, calibration data should be checked and the details recorded for inclusion in
the Report of Survey.
Site Selection
Considerable care should be taken on network creation, site selection and density, installation of the
reference stations and the techniques for measurement of angles and distances, to ensure the necessary
accuracy in the positioning to meet the survey Order. The type of survey being undertaken (harbour and
approach, littoral, coastal or off-shore), the selected positioning system (visual /EDM/EPS/Satellite), the
number of the LOPs and their geometry within the survey area will all have an influence on the final
decision.
The site selection should be based on:
a. accessibility of the site by land or from sea;

b. the ability to occupy the station or the necessity to create an eccentric station;
c. proximity to the shore or coastline with clear views to seaward;
d. inter-visibility to adjacent sites, clear of structures likely to cause interference of EDM/EPS
signals and unobstructed receipt of the satellite signals;
e. availability of mains power or space to co-locate portable power supplies, such as
batteries/solar panels and generators;
f. site security and ability to leave equipment untended;
g. site elevation and suitability for chosen positioning system.
Beacon Deployment and Inspection
Check lists, created by the surveyor-in-charge from the equipment manuals, should be followed during
the installation of the ground reference stations (EPS, DGPS or RTK GPS) or during the use of
visual/EDM tools for measuring angles/distances (sextant, theodolite, EDM, total station) to ensure the
correct operation of the system and similar techniques are used throughout the survey.
The type of the deployed ground reference stations (EPS, DGPS or RTK GPS) will determine the
frequency of inspection necessary to verify correct operation; this is also the case for unmonitored total
stations operating in automatic mode.
M-13
424
4.1.5 Alignment and Calibration of Positioning Systems
General Description
The type of system or tool selected will dictate the procedure adopted to verify performance against the
anticipated limits to ensure the achieved positional accuracy matches the select survey Order
requirements, as expressed in Table 7.1.
The alignment/calibration procedures and techniques, detailed in the user manual (or operator manual),
should always be followed at the beginning and end of a survey and when deemed necessary to verify
system performance in the field, particularly if performance or accuracy is suspect. These checks should
be conducted, as far as possible, within the survey area at the expected ranges and against a previously
calibrated higher order system or navigational aid or between co-ordinated control stations. All total
stations, EDM systems and prisms used for primary control work should be serviced regularly, checked
frequently over lines of known length and in date for periodic factory calibration.
Angular Measurement
Care should be taken to ensure that the correct observing techniques for angular measurement systems
(sextants, theodolites, total stations) are used and that instruments are set up to minimise errors.
Instruments should be in-date for calibrations and service; standard zeros for the appropriate order of
observations should always be used and careful recording techniques to avoid blunders.
Each station selected for use should be visited and carefully checked against the station description, the
distances to fixed reference points should be confirmed to determine if the station mark has been displaced.
New stations should be checked for inter-visibility to the survey area and other stations and be linked to 3
established stations. The use of eccentric stations should be avoided whenever possible. Any amendments to
the planned observing scheme due to unsuitability of the sites should be re-analysed to ensure that the
standard for the order of survey is being met. All stations used should be marked and full descriptions
recorded before observing at or to them.
When determining heights by angular measurement reciprocal heighting is to be used whenever possible.
Before moving the observing instrument, verify the data recorded to ensure the observations, both angular
and distance, are to the standard required, if the standards are not met, re-observe the entire set of
observations.
The verified final angular and distance observations should be adjusted to the grid as appropriate for each
type of observation by using an approved computer program and then compute the most probable position
and error ellipse data. The error ellipse of each new station position should be carefully examined to
determine the quality of the final position. Network analysis should be conducted.
Distance Measurement
When using distance measuring systems (EDM, EODM, total stations, etc.), all the procedures described
in the operator/equipment manuals should be followed and a comparison check conducted against a
geodetic baseline or a higher order system with greater or equal accuracy to that required by the order of
survey for establishing position.
M-13
425
2D Measurement
As with distance measuring systems, the guidance in the user/equipment manuals should be followed for
2D positioning systems with appropriate calibration and comparison checks conducted against higher
order systems or geodetic baselines/networks.
When planning the use of microwave EPF systems to validate GPS positional data prior to the
commencement of survey operations, care should be taken to ensure that established stations are all on a
common datum. Navigation systems should be calibrated and verified by comparison with an alternative
precise positioning system at the start of each survey and a validation undertaken at the end.
Satellite Measurement (3D)
When using GPS satellite systems, observing procedures articulated by the Hydrographic Office and
detailed in the user guides should be followed with great care to ensure the equipment is operated to its
maximum capability for the various modes of positioning SPS, PPS, Differential and RTK available. All
systems should be verified prior to fieldwork and a closing validation conducted on completion of
observing secessions against a geodetic baseline, high order geodetic control net or a system with greater
or equal accuracy to that required by the order of survey.
4.1.6 Horizontal Control Methods and Equipment
4.1.6.1 Sextant Resection Positioning
General Description
Sextant positioning involves the simultaneous observation of two horizontal angles between three known
objects from which the position of an offshore point is resected (see Figure 7.1). Sextant positioning is
totally performed aboard the survey vessel and does not depend on electronics, communications, or shore-
based support. Under certain conditions (i.e., close to targets or for near static position fixes) it can be
relatively accurate when properly conducted by an experienced team. In general, however, sextant
positioning under dynamic vessel conditions is no longer considered accurate for most applications.
Hydrographic marks for sextant-controlled surveys may be located by sextant fixes or by sextant cuts.
Lower than third-order traverse methods may be used, if the distance from a basic or supplemental control
station does not exceed 4 km for hydrographic surveys at scales of less than 1: 10,000 or 2 km for larger
scale surveys.
M-13
426
Survey Area
cross section vessel track
β1 Reference Target C
FIX1 β2
Resected α1
β3
Vessel
Position α2
α3
FIX2 FIX3
Successive
Resected Reference Target B
Vessel
Position
α and β are the
observed
sextant angles
Reference Target A
Fig. 7.1 “Sextant Resection positioning”
A single sextant angle may be used in conjunction with a fixed range LOP, as shown in Figure 7.2
(Hopper dredge positioning). In the past this was a common technique for locating hopper dredges.
On stable offshore vessels and other platforms, multiple sextant angles can be observed to several targets
(Redundant sextant resectioning). The resultant fix can be adjusted by onboard software using least
squares adjustment techniques with results being quite accurate (less than ±1 m in some isolated cases).
M-13
427
Survey Area
Reference
Sextant
Target
observed
sextant
angle
Preplotted
sextant angles
and Ranges
Range Targets
Fig. 7.2 “Hopper dredge positioning”
Accuracy and Quality Control
The two observed sextant angles form the loci of circles, the intersection of which is the vessel's position.
Each angle forms a circle defined by three points: the two shore control points/targets and the vessel. The
geometry of these two intersecting circles is a primary factor in determining the strength of a sextant
resection, as the two intersecting circles converge on each other, the resultant position weakens
drastically. In the best conditions, dynamic positional accuracies were rarely better than ±5 m (95%
RMS), average accuracies were generally in the 10 to 20 meter range.
The simplest method for estimating resection accuracy at any point is to move each angle by its estimated
accuracy and assess the resultant change in position. This is readily done when automated resection
computing software is available, or by noting the position shift in a station-pointer. Positional accuracy
should be accessed at various points in the work area. In performing sextant resection positioning the
following QC factors must be considered:
a. sextant angles precision;

b. observer synchronization;
c. vessel velocity and motion;
d. observer experience and fatigue;
e. type of targets.
M-13
428
Due to design and handling, internal sextant instrument calibration is not particularly stable; therefore
observers should continuously check the calibration of their sextants. This is usually done periodically
during the survey, typically at the end of each survey line.
Few opportunities exist to perform quality assurance (QA) checks on sextant positioning. When more
than three targets were visible, different resection positions could be compared from an anchored position.
Sextant fixes at distances approaching the limit of visibility of the marks are likely to be weak because the
angles or rates of change are small. The sextant must be in perfect adjustment, and the angles measured
and read with extreme accuracy, to the nearest 30 seconds of arc if necessary. If the sum of the two
angles frequently approaches 180º with one angle often being very large and the other very small, the rate
of change of angle will be rapid when the vessel is moving; thus, particular care must be taken to ensure
simultaneous observations; the effects of errors introduced by failure to observe angles simultaneously is
minimized when the distance of the marks from the observe are small.
4.1.6.2 Triangulation/Intersection Positioning
General Description
An offshore vessel or platform can be positioned (triangulated) by transit or theodolite angles observed
from base line points on shore. This technique may have an application in areas where electronic
positioning systems cannot be deployed or where increased positional accuracy is required. As indicated
in Figure 7.3, two (or more) shore-based transit or theodolite observers are required. Due to the higher
precision and stability of the instruments, the resultant positional accuracy can be quite good. Theodolite
stations should meet the accuracy requirements for special order or order 1 surveys. The angle of
intersection at the vessel should be such that a directional error of 1 minute from a theodolite station will
not cause the position of the vessel to be in error by more than 1 mm at the scale of the survey; angles
greater than 30º and less than 150º will usually ensure meeting this condition. Triangulation techniques
are often used to supplement electronic distance measurement (EDM) or DGPS positioning of fixed
offshore structures (piers, bridges, rigs, etc.) both during construction and subsequent deformation
monitoring.
M-13
429
Survey Area
Survey boat antenna

(triangulated position)
observed Occupied Reference

azimuths Station with transits
or theodolitis
Additional
observed
azimuths
Triangulation
Baseline
Range Targets
Fig. 7.3 “Triangulation/Intersection positioning”
Accuracy
Triangulation/Intersection positional accuracy depends on the tracking accuracy of the system in use; it is
related to the geometric strength of the intersection from two angles or azimuth directions and varies
throughout the survey area because the angular standard errors for each instrument vary as a function of
distance between the instrument and the survey vessel. The average of the standard errors of each angular
measurement at the offshore vessel position, together with the computed range from each observing
reference point, gives an estimate of the triangulated/intersected positional accuracy.
Multiple azimuth intersection techniques, allowing three or more additional angular observations, enables
increased accuracy with redundancy provided by the additional measurements from other shore stations.
Often azimuth alignments are combined with simultaneously EDM or GPS range measurements and a
least squares adjustment technique is performed, if automated acquisition is running during the survey
operations
Quality Control and Quality Assurance
QC is performed with periodic backsight checks during the course of the survey. Independent QA should
be performed with a third instrument, which is not very easy to perform in practice and normally an EDM
or GPS system is used to make checks.
M-13
430
4.1.6.3 Visual Positioning
General Description
This traditional method was often used to locate a hopper dredge relative to known shore features or flags
and is still used for a few applications, such as horizontal and vertical alignment of construction
equipment, rigs, barges, etc.
Relative visual positioning techniques is now rarely performed, given the availability of microwave EPS,
range-azimuth and GPS positioning methods; it is generally suitable only for non-navigation
reconnaissance work where identifiable features (navigational aids, beacons, day markers, bridges and
other structures or map features) on the supplied drawings, navigation charts or maps are assumed to be
accurate for this standard of survey.
Centreline
Ranges
Baseline
Fig. 7.4 “Range poles, flags, and/or lasers set ashore for relative positioning”
The main points of this method are:
a. the boat maintains constant survey speed between all the identifiable objects or range
intersections;
b. fixes are taken when the survey boat is passing abeam or lateral to an identifiable object;
c. positions are interpolated between fixes;
d. vessel speed is assumed to be constant between fixes, which are assumed to be free of errors;
e. position determination may be obtained by intersection of shore points and ranges
established by sighting across such features;
f. results should be used with caution due to the approximate nature of data and the marginal
accuracy of such a survey.
Accuracy and Quality Control
Accuracy is difficult to estimate and QC is rarely performed, when using visual positioning techniques.
M-13
431
4.1.6.4 Tag Line Positioning
General Description
This traditional method was often used before the 1970s to monitor dredging progress of navigation
projects and traditional channel cross-section surveys and in subsurface investigation for channel
obstructions and channel clearance sweep surveys. Tag Line techniques were replaced by microwave
EPS and range-azimuth techniques and now have been superseded by GPS positioning methods.
Within limited distances off the baseline and with proper execution, a tag line controlled survey is an
accurate and stable method of performing hydrographic surveys and other investigative work for marine
design and construction:
a. a calibrated wire rope is employed, stretched perpendicular from berths or hubs on a baseline
to the survey boat;
b. is maintained around berthing areas for critical site investigation work; where GPS signals
are blocked for such surveys (however an electronic total station is preferred);
c. usually requires no electronics or communication devices.
Transit man Tag line for distance

Tag line for angle
Fig. 7.5 “Tag line surveys”
Techniques
A tag line survey is simply a method of running cross sections from a fixed baseline.
Different survey techniques should be performed, depending on type of operations and instruments
adopted as:
a. static observations – tag line length observations are made when the boat is properly aligned
on the section and the wire is pulled taut to minimise sag;
b. dynamic or continuous tag line surveys – some tag line surveys are conducted in a dynamic
mode using analogue echo sounders;
c. baseline boat tag line extension methods – tag lines may be anchored to a floating vessel
(baseline boat) that has previously been positioned by tag line or other means;
d. constant range methods – a tag line may be used to maintain a constant range from the
baseline hub;
M-13
432
e. baseline layout for tag line survey – intermediate points or baseline for controlling tag line
work are set using standard construction survey techniques and standards;
f. tag line alignment methods – visual range flags, right angle prisms, transits, theodolites,
sextants, and total stations are used for maintaining lateral alignment control of the survey
boat, which can be the weakest part in the performance of tag line surveys, especially if
strong currents are present;
g. data recording procedures – tag line survey and related depth measurements may be recorded
on worksheets or in a standard field survey book, survey data are plotted in either site plan or
section formats;
h. survey boats – any type of survey boat, equipped with tag line man-hold or powered
winches, may be used to conduct tag line surveys. Generally boats’ length range from 5 to 8
metres and drafts are less than 0.40 metres are essential to work in shallow water areas and
to provide ease of beaching.
Accuracy and Calibration Requirements
Accuracy: the positional accuracy of a point positioned by tag line may be computed using the estimated
accuracy of the alignment and distance measurements; similar to that done with range-azimuth survey
methods.
Calibration: flagged tag line intervals must be periodically calibrated every 3 to 6 months or after breaks
against a chained measure or EDM system.
4.1.6.5 Range-Azimuth Positioning
General Description
This, once widely used positioning technique, is based on the intersection of azimuth-range
measurements, generally performed from the same shore reference station, similar to a forward traverse
computation, see Figure 7.6. Now days it is employed only where GPS positioning cannot be obtained
due to satellite masking. The main features are:
a. angle observations (azimuth) can be measured by transits, theodolites, or total stations;

b. distance observations (range) can be measured by EPS devices (laser or infrared EDM,
microwave EPS or total stations);
c. data can be manually observed, noted on field book and voice-relayed to the boat by radio or
digitally recorded and transmitted by radio-modem to the boat;
d. typically used within 5 km of coastline and/or reference station;
e. high relative accuracy is achievable depending on the equipment used (best accuracies are
achieved by automated theodolites/EDM or total stations);
f. periodic calibration or a third LOP measurement (angle or range) is essential for redundancy;
g. a small team is required to perform the survey (relatively efficient);
h. boats 5 to 8 metres long often is used;
M-13
433
Survey Area
Automated data collection
allow cross section track
Shore based
Station (R-α)
Prior of automated system a

CLOP was used as track line
to steer the vessel
Code A
Fig. 7.6 “Range-Azimuth positioning”
i. theodolite with laser or infrared EDM and total station are highly accurate as range-azimuth
systems for Special Order survey areas within 2 km of the reference point;
j. microwave based EPS will rarely meet positional accuracy standards for Order 1 (2 m or 5
m);
k. dynamic alidade or transit stadia distances meet positional accuracy standards for Order 1
(accurate to 5 meters) within ranges of only 30-50 metres, depending on conditions.
Quality Control Procedures and Requirements
Angular orientation:
a. the lower plate of the tracking device must initially be referenced, relative to the survey
project, to the grid azimuth of the reference back sight (000° line of sight);
b. additional reference lines of sight (landmarks) should be taken as a redundant reference
orientation;
c. all reference orientation points should be selected as the farthest and most reliable visible
controls, sighted on and relative errors resolved onsite;
d. all orientation measures and grid azimuth computation must be recorded on a field book.
Periodic orientation checks:
a. periodic orientation checks on the initial reference back sight (000° line of sight) should be
performed during the survey (normally every 20/30 fixes or 5/10 minutes or at the end of
each survey line) to ensure that no horizontal or vertical misalignment occurred to the
instrument;
M-13
434
b. additional reference lines of sight (landmarks) should be taken, this should normally
completed at the beginning and at the end of the survey session;
c. periodic readjustment and re-levelling of the instrument should be performed as required
after these checks;
d. all periodic checks and re-levelling operations should be noted into the field book;
e. if the orientation check indicates a significant misalignment, all fixes taken since the
previous orientation check must be rejected and the measurements rerun.
Quality assurance checks:
a. independent positional checks are rarely available as with most visual survey positioning
methods;
b. carrier phase RTK-DGPS techniques allow independent positional checks, but these will be
performed with geodetic receivers in static mode and in the topographic range field;
c. for critical navigation surveys, position checks should always be done with the vessel as near
as possible to a reference control point.
4.1.6.6 Electronic Positioning
General Description
A variety of systems have been developed, most of which have become obsolete since GPS became fully
operational. However, the basic operating concepts behind land-based Electronic Positioning Systems
(EPS) and related trilateration positioning (including GPS) have not significantly changed.
Land-based (or terrestrial) positioning systems use time difference and trilateration techniques to
determine a position.
Electronic Positioning Systems (EPS)
In general EPS are classified according to their operating frequencies or the bandwidth, see Table 7.2 of
Appendix 3 to Chapter 7, which determine the operating range and accuracy, and thus a system's
applicability for a particular type of work. In general, the higher the frequency of the system and the
shorter the wavelength, the greater the achievable accuracy possible in the resolved position, see Table
7.2 of Appendix 3 to Chapter 7.
Medium-frequency Electronic Positioning Systems (RAYDIST/DECCA):
a. systems were first developed in 1950s but they are no longer used;
b. systems operated by time/phase differencing methods, resulting in either circular or
hyperbolic lattices (time differences);
c. systems required repeated calibration to resolve whole-wavelength (lane) ambiguities and
continual monitoring during the course of the survey to resolve lane or cycle slips, similar to
the integer ambiguity determination requirements for modern day DGPS;
d. onsite calibration was essential to maintain accuracy, but in very far offshore surveys
calibration was often impossible;
e. visual positioning techniques were used to calibrate these systems.
Low-frequency Electronic Positioning Systems (LORAN-C):
a. the primary marine and airborne navigation system for over 40 years;
b. a low-frequency time-differencing hyperbolic system;
M-13
435
c. suitable only for general navigation or reconnaissance surveys (Order 3 when calibrated);
d. daily near-site or onsite calibration is critical if any semblance of absolute accuracy is to be
maintained;
e. absolute positional accuracy is about + 450 metres (+ 0.25 mile) at best, without onsite
calibration.
Range-Range EPS
These microwave EPS (hyperbolic or circular) were introduced in the 1970s and remained the primary
positioning system up until the mid 1990s, thereafter their use declined when differential GPS techniques
became available for large areas. Nowadays microwave EPS (Range/Range) are still in use in those areas
where poor GPS signal coverage occurs.
a. Trilateration is the process performed by the Range/Range microwave EPS when

determining the co-ordinates by intersection of measured distances from two (or more) shore
control points:
i. a Circular Line of Position (CLOP) is associated with the distance from each shore
station;
ii. each pair of CLOP generates two intersection points, which are generated each
side of the connecting baseline between the two shore stations points;
iii. each EPS uses its own method to solve this ambiguity, by orientation to initial
reference point co-ordinates or by referencing the calculated position relative to the
azimuth of the baseline;
iv. initially EPS distances were visually observed and steered, performing manual data
logging in a workbook or field book with manual fixing on a plotting sheet;
v. modern EPS use built-in automated data acquisition systems that log the ranges
and compute the relative positions, subsequently sending this data to a helmsman
display unit and a track plotter;
vi. present-day EPS, and also GPS systems, transmit the raw digital data to a PC
running a suitable Acquisition and Control Process package, capable of
synchronizing position and sounding in logged data files, whilst performing real-
time positioning QC and tracking the position in several windows selected on the
main operator and helmsman monitors.
M-13
436
Survey Area
Automated data collection
allow cross section track
Code C
PBC
PAB Shore based

Transponders
Code B
Prior of automated system a

CLOP was used as track line
to steer the vessel
Code A
Fig. 7.7 “Two Range Intersection”
b. Constant range tracking provides a good backup capability should failure occurred in the
automated positioning and guidance system. When no automated techniques are available,
the vessel follows a CLOP:
i. by keeping a constant range from one reference station;

ii. by fixing at range intercepts from the other reference station;
iii. by proceeding at low speed, to produce a better accuracy in positioning and ease
the helmsman’s task of following the curve range pattern;
iv. survey lines are circular, not aligned to the project co-ordinate system and often
not orthogonal to the main bathymetry.
c. Automated range-range tracking:
i. the range intersection co-ordinates are automatically computed from the precise
co-ordinates of the shore stations;
ii. the point co-ordinates are transformed relative to the project alignment co-ordinate
system (station-offset);
iii. analogue/digital course indicators or left-right track indicators receive positional
data, allowing the tracking of any cross section or offset range;
iv. position fixes are taken manually by the observer from a receiver or track plotter,
recording co-ordinates on in suitable workbook;
v. at each fix, the depth is marked on the paper trace of the analogue echo-sounder
and the value noted in the workbook;
M-13
437
vi. the correlation between position and sounding will be performed during the post-
processing stage;
vii. digitised depth data are correlated in real time with positional data in a data
acquisition software system at regular preset intervals.
Range-Range Accuracy
The intersection accuracy is a function of two factors:
a. The range accuracy of distances (or standard deviation σ);

b. The angle of intersection that varies relative to the baseline, positional accuracy varies as the
vessel changes its position in the survey area.
Quality Control
Main quality control criteria to be considered on Microwave EPS accuracy:
a. α angle of intersection has major effect on position determination and should be between 45°
and 135°;
b. σ isn’t constant with distance from a shore station and in general is in the order of ±3 m
rather than the ±1 m or 2 m stated by manufacturers for ideal or well calibrated conditions;
c. the average positional accuracy (σ ±3 m) can vary from 5 to 10 metres.
Multiple Range Positioning
Multiple range positioning techniques. (ie. Racal Micro Fix, Sercel Syledis, Motorola Falcon VI)
The position is determined from the computed co-ordinates of the intersections of three or more
simultaneously observed range circles.
The CLOPs don’t intersect at the same point because each range contains observational errors:
a. three different co-ordinates result from three observed ranges and six separate co-ordinates
result from four observed ranges;
b. an adjustment of these co-ordinates gives the final position and is normally performed on-
line at each update cycle generally by a least-squares minimisation technique or simply by
the strongest angle of intersection or not weighted average of all the intersecting coordinates.
The positional data are then transformed to a project-specific co-ordinate system as described for a two-
range system:
a. the use of multiple ranging minimises uncertainties with the vessel position being obtained
by adjustment of these ranges to a best fit; an on-line accuracy assessment is accomplished
by evaluating the positional intersection misclosure of CLOPs which contain errors ( see
Figure 7.8);
M-13
438
Residuals
3
P13 P12
ν1
ν2
ν3
2 P23
1
Adjusted Position
Additional Range
Fig. 7.8 “ Multiple CLOPs Intersection”
b. an assessment of the range measurement accuracy may be obtained by computing the

residual range errors (v) for each position (automated software, using a least-squares type of
adjustment, can provide an accuracy estimate of the positional RMS error at each position
update);
c. automated EPS give an alarm when RMS exceed prescribed limits, assuming a constant
initial standard error within the survey area.
Calibrations and Quality Control
The process of calibrating a microwave EPS is performed by the following basic steps:
a. independent determination of the vessel's antenna location;

b. comparison of differences between the observed microwave distances and the distances
computed from an independent measuring system (if observing the direct distances);
or
b. comparison of differences between the observed microwave co-ordinates and those

computed from the independent system;
c. performing a series of independent calibrations (Repeated Calibrations), the correction to
the EPS, to be applied a the console or stored into position computation software, is
represented by the mean range difference.
The systems and methods used to perform an independent calibration would include:
a. EDM calibration – series of EDM distance readings is directly compared with the
simultaneously observed microwave ranges and corrections are then applied;
M-13
439
b. baseline calibrations – the simplest microwave EPS calibration method, the survey vessel is
positioned at a point on the baseline between two shore stations and the computed distance is
compared with the combined observed ranges from the microwave system, range
corrections are computed and applied. This method should be repeated at various points on
the baseline and should be performed between all pairs of shore stations;
c. total station instrument calibration – the observed co-ordinates of an automated positioning

system can be directly compared with the more accurate co-ordinates obtained from total
station EDM measurements;
d. triangulation intersection – the most accurate method of microwave calibration is performed

in a dynamic environment. Three theodolites are used for this high-accuracy triangulation
calibration, a series of 5 to 10 measurements, intersection fixes, to the moving survey vessel.
For each series of measurements, the triangulated positions are computed, inversed, and
converted to grid distances which are compared against the simultaneously observed
microwave ranges. An estimate of the statistic validity of the mean range difference must be
calculated as previously explained;
e. sextant resection – this method is valid only when resection geometry is ideal, near the shore
line and a very slow vessel motion. A numbers of simultaneous resection angles (5 to 10)
and corresponding microwave EPS distances are observed with three sextants centred near
the EPS antenna to minimise eccentric errors. Resection computation should performed
using suitable software providing a quality indication of the resection based on the geometry
and estimated standard error of the observed angles, to judge whether applying a mean
correction to the range is statistically appropriate.
f. General QC criteria for EPS:
i. the static calibration does not simulate the dynamic survey condition;
ii. the calibration must be performed within or close as possible to the survey area, to
simulate the real conditions within the project area;
iii. the accuracy of the independent calibration procedure followed must be better or at
least equal to the calibrating microwave EPS;
iv. the multi-path residual effects can be reduced but not eliminated by calibration
procedures due to survey vessel antenna location and orientation;
v. calibrations of pulsing microwave EPS are valid only for the particular range
measurement system used;
vi. the more accurate measurement systems used to calibrate EPS must also be
independently checked, or verified, to prevent blunders (GPS, Total station,
theodolites, etc);
vii. calibration procedures must be consistent during the course of a project.
Some of these basic criteria, described for performing EPS calibrations, are also applicable to GPS
positioning techniques.
M-13
440
4.1.6.7 Global Positioning System (GPS)
General Description
During the 1990s the Global Positioning System (GPS) has become the worldwide standard positioning
and navigation system and has replaced almost all other techniques. Poor GPS satellite coverage only
occurs in isolated instances over relatively small areas, in these cases the traditional terrestrial methods
will need to be employed. Differential GPS systems allow for world wide coverage, they do not always
require the site selection/deployment effort required for terrestrial systems however careful pre-survey
calibration and post survey validations are still required; accuracies now exceed those of any other
hydrographic survey positioning system.
DGPS
Reference
Station
Bench mark
Chart datum
Fig. 7.9 “Differential GPS positioning of a hydrographic survey vessel”
The system consists of two absolute positioning services, the Standard Positioning Service (SPS) and the
Precise Positioning Service (PPS):
a. SPS is available to civilian users, using the C/A-code on the L1 carrier, it provides absolute
accuracies of 10-30 meters in absolute positioning mode;
M-13
441
b. PPS was developed for the U.S. military and other authorized users; it uses the P(Y)-code on
the L1 and L2 carriers providing an absolute accuracy of 5-15 meters in absolute positioning
mode.
For many applications, this absolute positioning does not provide sufficient accuracy. Differential GPS
(DGPS) is a technique which can provide relative positioning with an accuracy of a few meters using
code phase measurements to a few millimetres with carrier phase measurements. DGPS requires two or
more GPS receivers to be recording measurements simultaneously and processing software to reduce or
eliminate “common errors”. With a reference system positioned at a known survey control point, DGPS
data can be used to determine baselines between stations and establish the positions of other receivers
within the same reference system. Code and carrier phase DGPS, when operating in a differential mode,
can be tracked in real-time for the positioning of moving platforms, dredges, survey boat and vessels (see
Figure 7.9) to provide real-time information at accuracies required for hydrographic surveying and/or
dredge positioning.
Tracking Techniques (see paragraph 6.1.4.1 of Chapter 2)
Phase tracking techniques are:
a. carrier phase tracking;

b. code phase tracking.
Accuracies
The absolute range measurement accuracies or standard deviation achievable with GPS depends on:
a. the type of code used (C/A or P);

b. a three-dimensional (3-D) confidence ellipsoid describing the uncertainties in all three
geocentric co-ordinates, when coupled with the GDOP of the satellites during the position
determination;
c. the time and the location of the changing satellite geometry.
The nominal accuracy statistics for a GPS user are defined by error propagation techniques. The user
range measurement accuracies refer to geocentric co-ordinates, which can be transformed to a local
datum, and to a 3-D covariance matrix, which defines and assess the dimensions (direction or co-ordinate)
of the error ellipsoid in the reference system.
The more usual methods to describe error measures are listed below:
a. 2-D (horizontal) GPS positional accuracies are normally estimated using a Root Mean
Square (RMS) radial error statistic;
b. 3-D GPS accuracy measurements are most commonly expressed by Spherical Error
Probable, or SEP. This measure represents the radius of a sphere with a 50% confidence or
probability level and the spheroid radial measure only approximates the actual 3-D ellipsoid,
representing the uncertainties in the geocentric co-ordinate system.
c. for 2-D horizontal positioning, CEP (Circular Error Probable) is commonly used as the
probable or statistic error measure, represented the radius of a circle containing a 50%
probability of position confidence;
M-13
442
Accuracy Comparisons
It is important that GPS accuracy measures clearly identify the statistics from which they are derived. A
“20 meter” or “5 meter” accuracy statistic is meaningless unless it is identified as being 1-D, 2-D, or 3-D,
together with an applicable probability level. In addition, absolute GPS point positioning accuracies are
defined relative to an earth-centred co-ordinate system/datum. This co-ordinate system will differ
significantly from local project or construction datum. Nominal GPS accuracies may also be published as
design or tolerance limits, and actual accuracies achieved can differ significantly from these values.
Relative Accuracy Measures
Hydrographic surveys performed according to IHO/S-44 Standards are concerned with absolute world-
wide (ϕ, λ, h) positional accuracy at 95% confidence level, but normally engineering, construction, and
dredging surveys are concerned with local project coordinates (X, Y, h), and with ensuring high accuracy
within a local construction project. The relative accuracy measure is expressed typically in parts per
million (ppm) as a function of the distance between two points or receivers and usually given at the one-
sigma standard error (or 68% standard deviation) level.
Dilution of Precision (DOP)
GPS errors resulting from satellite configuration geometry can be expressed in terms of Dilution of
Precision (DOP), which is the geometric strength of the configuration of satellites observed during the
survey session. In mathematical terms, DOP is a scalar quantity used in an expression of a ratio of the
positioning accuracy (or of the standard deviation of one co-ordinate to the measurement accuracy). DOP
represents the geometrical contribution of a certain scalar factor to the uncertainty (i.e., standard
deviation) of a GPS measurement. In 2-D (horizontal) positioning it refers to the HDOP factor.
Reference Datum
In general differential survey methods are concerned with relative co-ordinate differences, but in absolute
positioning and for navigation purposes we must consider variations within a global reference system
used by the NAVSTAR GPS. Thus, GPS co-ordinate differences or transformations from the World
Geodetic System 84 (WGS 84) reference system must be applied to any type of local reference datum.
On the North American continent the co-ordinates of WGS 84 are highly consistent with North American
Datum 83 (NAD 83). The European Terrestrial Reference Frame (ETRF89) is a realisation of WGS 84
for the European Continent. Each nation in Europe has determined their own transformation to tie the
ETRF to the local datum.
Error Sources (see paragraph 6.1.3 of Chapter 2) and Calibration Requirements
The accuracy of GPS is a function of errors and interferences on the GPS signal and the processing
technique used to reduce and remove these errors. Similar to range-range microwave systems, GPS
signals are highly affected by humidity and multi-path; additional errors are caused by the 20,000 km path
through the ionosphere and troposphere layers. It should be remembered that satellite signals can be
altered for US national security reasons by the use of Anti Spoofing (AS). Differential techniques close
to a reference station can eliminate most of these errors, however the further the remote operates from the
reference station, the less similar will be the errors received by both receivers.
DGPS operation has no prescribed calibration requirements (check list), unlike microwave or R/A
systems; the major blunders to check for are:
a. incorrect project datum or geodetic reference datum;
M-13
443
b. incorrect master station co-ordinate values;

c. incorrect measurement of antenna height values;
d. DGPS mode not selected in the unit;
e. RTCM-104 input/output format not selected.
Positioning Methods
Two general operating methods, used to obtain GPS positions for dynamic horizontal control, have a
variety of applications for hydrographic surveys at sea:
a. absolute point positioning;

b. relative positioning (DGPS).
In general, absolute point positioning involves only a single passive receiver and is not sufficiently
accurate for precise surveying or hydrographic positioning requirements. It is, however, the most widely
used military (PPS) and commercial (SPS) GPS positioning method. Relative (Differential) positioning
requires at least two receivers and can provide the accuracies required for basic land surveying and
offshore positioning.
Absolute Point Positioning (Pseudo-Ranging)
The GPS receiver generates a navigation solution by pseudo-ranging, measuring an approximate distance
(pseudo-range) between the antenna and the satellite by correlation of a satellite-transmitted code and a
reference code created by the receiver, no corrections are made for errors in synchronization between the
clocks in the transmitter and the receiver. The distance which the signal has travelled is equal to the
velocity of the transmission from the satellite multiplied by the elapsed time of transmission. Additional
delays (errors), which can affect positional accuracy, are caused by tropospheric and ionospheric
conditions. To create a GPS 3-D position, at least, four pseudo-range observations are required to resolve
the constant clock biases (t) contained in both the satellite and the ground-based receiver.
The solution of four pseudo-range observation equations, containing four unknowns (X, Y, Z and t.), gives
the solution for the 3-D position of a point (for a 2-D location only three pseudo-range observations are
needed), it is highly dependent on the following accuracies:
a. the accuracy of the known co-ordinates of each satellite (i.e., Xs, Ys, and Zs);
b. the accuracy of the modelled atmospheric delays (d);
c. the accuracy of the resolution of the actual time measurement process performed in a GPS
receiver (clock synchronization, signal processing, signal noise, etc.);
d. the accuracy of an absolute point position is a function of the range measurement accuracy
and the geometry of the satellites (DOP).
Dilution of Precision (DOP) is a description of the geometrical contribution to uncertainty in a GPS

determined point position and is roughly related to the physical orientation of the satellites relative to the
ground receiver along with the range measurement accuracy.
Static Solution - as with any measurement process, repeated and redundant range observations to the
satellites at varying orientations will enhance the overall positional accuracy and reliability. In static
mode with a stationary GPS antenna, range measurements to each satellite may be continuously measured
over the varying orbits of the satellite(s). The altering satellite orbits create changing positional
intersection geometry over the same ground position. In addition, simultaneous range observations to
M-13
444
numerous satellites can be adjusted using weighting techniques based on the strength of intersection and
pseudo-range measurement reliability.
Dynamic Solution - In dynamic mode where the GPS antenna is moving, range measurements to each
satellite are unique due to the altering orbital locations of the satellite(s). The varying satellite orbits and
the vessel speed cause changing positional intersection geometry over the moving GPS antenna position.
The NAVSTAR GPS satellite system gives two levels of absolute positioning accuracy:
a. Standard Positioning Service (SPS). The SPS is capable of achieving real-time 3-D absolute
positional information in the order of 10-30 m (95% confidence level on horizontal
accuracy). US DoD has implemented Anti-Spoofing (AS), which interchanges the P code
with a classified Y code, thus denying the SPS user the higher P code accuracy;
b. Precise Positioning Service (PPS). Non-military PPS users must be authorized by the US
DoD to have a decryption device capable of deciphering the encrypted GPS signals. This
authorization must be obtained from the National Security Agency (NSA). USACE is an
authorized user; however, actual use of the equipment has security implications. PPS users
can obtain real-time absolute 3-D positional accuracy in the order of 16 m SEP (or 5-15 m at
95% confidence level on horizontal accuracy).
The US DoD security action does not significantly impact a hydrographic user operating in a differential
positioning mode.
Absolute positioning (SPS/PPS) only provides real-time absolute positional accuracies and will not
satisfy the IHO/S-44 hydrographic surveying requirements for Special Order and Order 1. It does have
general navigation applications and will eventually replace LORAN-C and other navigation systems for
ships and aircraft.
Differential Point Positioning (DGPS)
Differential positioning is the technique used to position one point relative to another, both receiving
stations simultaneously observing the same satellites. Since errors in the satellite position (Xs, Ys, and Zs)
and atmospheric delay estimates (d) are effectively the same, they can be ignored to a large extent. This
method can be performed by using code or carrier phase measurements and can provide results in real-
time or post processed.
a. DGPS Code Phase tracking. The technique consists of two GPS receivers; one set up over a
known point and one moving from point to point or placed on a moving survey vessel,
measuring pseudo-ranges to at least four common satellites. Since the positions of the
satellites are known and one of the receivers is over a fixed known point, a “known distance”
can be computed for each observed satellite. This “known distance” can then be compared
against the “measured distance” (or Pseudo Range) to obtain a Pseudo Range Correction
(PRC), which is computed for each satellite being tracked at the fixed point. Each PRC can
then be applied to the moving or remote receiver to correct the measured distances. Code
phase tracking has primary applications to real-time positioning systems with meter-level
accuracies. It is sufficient for hydrographic survey positioning which meets IHO S-44
requirements for Order 1 surveys, since meter-level positioning suffices for the vast majority
of these purposes.
M-13
445
b. DGPS Carrier Phase tracking. This is the most accurate GPS survey technique and the
relative positional accuracies are of the order of two to five parts per million (ppm) between
two GPS receivers (one at a known reference point and the other at an unknown location or
aboard a moving platform). The tracking method uses a similar formulation of pseudo-
ranges used in code phase tracking systems described above, but with a more complex
process when the carrier signals are tracked. The short wavelength (19 cm) necessitates the
adding of an ambiguity factor to the solution equations to account for the unknown number
of whole carrier cycles over the pseudo-range. Carrier phase tracking provides for a more
accurate range resolution due to the short (19 cm) wavelength and the ability of a receiver to
resolve the carrier phase down to about 2 mm. This method is referred to as real-time
kinematic or RTK and provides 3D positions accurate to a few centimetres over ranges up to
approximately 20 kilometres. It is applicable to hydrographic survey positioning and meets
IHO/S-44 requirements for Special Order surveys and may be employed with either static or
kinematic receivers.
c. Advantage of the code phase (DGPS) over the carrier phase(RTK):
i. wavelengths are much longer than the carrier wavelengths, eliminating the
ambiguity problem.
d. Disadvantage of the code phase (DGPS) over the carrier phase(RTK):
i. longer wavelengths decrease the system accuracy;

ii. longer wavelengths are more affected by signal multipath.
Real-Time Dynamic DGPS Positioning System (Code Phase)
The system in general includes:
a. reference station equipment (master);

b. communications links;
c. rover station equipment (remote user).
There are several DGPS services that provide real-time pseudo-range corrections:
a. radio beacon navigation services (Beacon IALA System);

b. commercial satellite subscription services;
c. commercial land base DGPS network services (telephone or mobile phone links);
d. local DGPS systems.
Local DGPS systems are normally installed or used by the agency responsible for a survey, where other
services do not provide coverage or sufficiently good accuracy to meet survey requirements.
Reference Station
The reference receiver consists of a GPS receiver, antenna, and processor that:
a. is placed at a known co-ordinated station with an unobstructed view of the sky from at least
10° above the horizon;
b. GPS antenna should be erected clear of objects likely to cause multi-path or interference
(avoid areas with antennas, microwave towers, power lines, and reflective surfaces);
M-13
446
c. measures timing and ranging information broadcast by the satellites;

d. computes and formats, every 1 to 3 seconds, the pseudo range corrections (PRC) then
transmits, broadcasting via the communications link, to the operator’s equipment in the
offshore vessel; the recommended data format is that proposed by the Radio Technical
Commission for Maritime Services (RTCM) Special Committee 104 v 2.0;
e. performs QC functions and determines the validity and quality of the computed PRCs.
Communications Link
a. the communications link is used as a transfer medium for the differential corrections, the
type is dependent on the user's requirements and the minimum transmission rate should be
200 bits per second (bps);
b. communication links operating at Very High Frequency (VHF), Ultra High Frequency
(UHF) and High Frequency (HF) are viable systems for the broadcast of DGPS corrections,
with ranges extending out from 20 to 50 km (VHF/UHF) and up to 200 km (HF), depending
on local propagation conditions and site elevation. The disadvantages of UHF and VHF
links are their range being restricted to line of sight and the effects of signal masking from
islands, structures and buildings, multi-path and licensing issues;
c. communication links require a reserved frequency of operation to avoid interference with

other activities in the area, all frequencies need authorisation for use within each nations
geographical area of responsibility;
d. several companies offer subscriptions for satellite communications, telephone or mobile

phone communications systems, capable of being used for the transmission of the PRCs;
e. satellite and phone communication systems are less limited in range than UHF/VHF systems
but are usually higher in price.
User Equipment
Using the technology of differential pseudo-ranging, the position of a survey vessel can be calculated
relative to the reference station with a receiver (the user equipment) that consists of real-time code phase
tracking DGPS, antenna and processor:
a. should be a multi-channel single frequency (L1) C/A code GPS receiver;

b. is capable of receiving the differential corrections from the communications link in the
RTCM SC-104 V.2.0 format and then applying those corrections to the measured pseudo-
range;
c. receiver update rate should be 1 to 3 seconds;
d. output from the rover receiver should be in the NMEA-183 format as the most widely used
format for input into hydrographic survey software packages;
e. equipment should be capable of maintaining positional tolerances for surveys at speeds up to
10 knots;
f. receivers should not bias the position during vessel turns due to excess filtering.
M-13
447
Separation Distances
a. the differential tropospheric and ionospheric corrections are not presently applied to internal
solutions of most GPS receivers and these errors contribute to horizontal position errors on
average 0.7 m per every 100 km;
b. the type of data link in use will be a limiting factor on the separation distance between the
reference station and mobile receiver, the reference station may need to be moved from one
point to another so that the minimum separation requirements are maintained.
Satellite Geometry
The Horizontal Dilution of Position (HDOP) is the critical geometrical component that:
a. in Order 1 and 2 surveys HDOP <5;

b. the 24 Block II GPS satellites constellation maintains a HDOP of approximately 2 to 3 most
of the time.
Other DGPS Services (Radiobeacon Navigation Service and Commercial WAAS)
Radiobeacon Navigation Service
The main function of the Radiobeacon Navigation Service is to provide aids to navigation in navigable
water covered by the service; the object is to substitute Loran-C and Omega systems, which were used as
the primary navigation systems for offshore marine navigation, with full coverage from GPS for more
accurate positioning. Many nations have commissioned real-time positioning systems for their coastal
areas, rivers and lakes regions, utilising DGPS and marine radiobeacon technology; there is a desire for
other maritime governments to expand the coverage to all offshore waterways and eventually have entire
world coverage.
a. System set-up and configuration:
i. GPS Radiobeacon:
• N. 2 GPS L1/L2 geodetic reference station receivers with independent geodetic
antennas to provide redundancy and a marine radiobeacon transmitter with
transmitting antenna;
• N. 2 combined L1 GPS/Modulation Shift Key (MSK) receivers used as integrity
monitors, each one utilises an independent GPS antenna and a MSK near-field
passive loop antenna.
b. Site location:
i. the location of the reference stations’ GPS antennas are known co-ordinated
geodetic control points based on the ITRF [i.e. ETRF (European Terrestrial
Reference Frame) datum for Europe and NAD 83 (North American Datum of
1983) datum for USA/Canada];
ii. GPS C/A-code pseudo-range corrections are computed and transmitted via a
marine radiobeacon;
M-13
448
iii. the system on board user vessels consists of a marine radiobeacon receiver and a
GPS receiver (or an integrated GPS/Radiobeacon receiver) with the ability to
accept and apply pseudo-range corrections; with accuracies of less than 5 m
achievable dependent on the type and quality of the user's GPS receiver, distance
from the reference station and the satellite geometry.
c. Data transmission (data types):
i. the corrections and other information are transmitted using the Type message of
the Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services Special Committee 104
(RTCM SC-104) version 2.1 data format;
ii. more detailed descriptions of these message types are explained in the Broadcast
Standard available for the Radiobeacon Navigation Service of each nation;
iii. corrections are generated for a maximum of nine satellites tracked by the reference
station GPS receiver at a minimum elevation angle of 7.5° above the horizon; if
more than nine satellites are observed above 7.5°, the corrections are based on the
nine satellites with the highest elevation angles;
iv. satellites below 7.5° elevation are masked due their susceptibility to multipath and
spatial decorrelation;
v. corrections are normally transmitted at a 100 or 200 baud rate;
vi. corrections can be considered valid for a period of 15 seconds from generation;
vii. using corrections more than 30 seconds old, particularly for positioning of a
moving platform, may cause spikes.
d. Availability and reliability of the system:
i. the system maintains a broadcast availability that exceeds 99.7%, in designed

coverage areas, assuming a healthy and complete GPS constellation;
ii. signal availability, in most areas, will be higher due to the overlap of broadcast
stations;
iii. each site is equipped with two integrity monitors (i.e. a GPS receiver with a MSK
radiobeacon) that are mounted over known positions, they receive the pseudo-
range corrections from that site and compute a position that is compared to the
known location to determine if the corrections are within the expected tolerance;
iv. the corrected positions calculated by the integrity monitors are sent via phone lines
to the control monitoring stations, which notify users via the type 16 message of
any problems with a radiobeacon site within 10 seconds of an out-of-tolerance
condition.
e. Coverage:
i. an updated coverage map can be found at the Radiobeacon Navigation Service web
site of each participating nation, under the DGPS section.
f. User requirements and equipment:
i. to receive and apply the pseudo-range corrections generated by the reference

station, the user needs to have a MSK Radiobeacon receiver with antenna and, at a
minimum, a L1 C/A code GPS receiver with antenna or a combined MSK
radiobeacon and GPS receiver with a combined MSK and GPS antenna, a more
expensive option.
M-13
449
The MSK receiver demodulates the signal from the reference station and generally will automatically
select the reference station with the strongest signal strength to track or it will allow the user to select a
specific reference station. Since the reference station generates corrections only for satellites above a 7.5°
elevation, satellites observed by the user's GPS receiver below a 7.5° elevation will not be corrected.
g. Position QC tolerance checks and calibrations:
i. most precise DGPS augmentation systems are capable of providing sub-meter

accuracies at reasonable distances from the nearest reference station, however, at
increasing distances spatial decorrelation errors (due to differing
ionospheric/tropospheric conditions) can induce systematic positional biases;
ii. in general, under nominal atmospheric conditions, less than 5 m RMS (95%)
positional accuracy may be achieved at distances upwards of 200 miles;
iii. to confirm positional accuracy is better than the 5 m tolerance, a static check
position should be obtained by occupying a known survey point near the project
area;
iv. when operating with the Radiobeacon Navigation Service, static positions should
be observed from different radiobeacon reference stations to ascertain if positional
systematic biases are present, in practice the closest beacon will normally be with
minimal biases;
v. when large or ambiguous positional biases occur in a project area, it may be
necessary to establish a local DGPS network (code or RTK carrier) for observing
different beacon positions in a static comparison;
vi. a similar process should be performed when using Commercial DGPS Wide Area
Augmentation Systems (WAAS, GLONASS, EGNOS, GALILEO, MSAS etc).
Real-Time Dynamic RTK DGPS (Carrier Phase)
General
The DGPS carrier phase is capable of yielding decimetre accuracy on a moving vessel within the
geographic area (20 km.), both horizontally and vertically. This technology, known as ‘On The Fly’, can
provide real-time elevations of survey vessels.
Current kinematic techniques allow for the ambiguities to be resolved while the receiver is in motion and
provides accuracies in the range from 2 to 5 cm. This method of carrier phase positioning is commonly
referred to as real-time kinematic or RTK surveying.
A real-time kinematic (RTK) DGPS positioning system is based on DGPS carrier phase technology
similar to the kinematic techniques currently used for static GPS geodetic surveys where millimetre level
accuracies are achieved. RTK procedures allow for the movement of a GPS receiver after the initial
integer ambiguity (i.e., whole number of wavelengths) between satellites and receiver has been resolved,
as outlined in Chapter 2.
Accurate real-time elevations (and depths related to the GPS antenna height) can be directly obtained
without observing tidal measurement data, if adequate motion compensation sensors are used and project
tidal datum modelling has been undertaken (see Figure 7.10).
M-13
450
DGPS RTK
Reference
Station
c
Δh (DGPS)
Bench mark
Chart datum
a = (Δh + b – c)
Fig. 7.10 “Principle of Real Time Kinematic DGPS elevation determination”
If elevations are obtained through the use of RTK DGPS techniques, Geoidal-ellipsoidal modelling and
tidal modelling procedures are mandatory and should be performed before RTK surveys can be
conducted.
Reference Station
The carrier phase positioning system is very similar to the current code phase tracking technology. A
shore GPS reference station is located over a known survey mark tied to the local horizontal/vertical
geodetic reference framework; however, the reference station must be capable of collecting both pseudo-
range and carrier phase data from the GPS satellites and will consist of:
a. a carrier phase dual frequency receiver capable of full wavelength L1/L2 with cross-
correlation technique during times of P-code encryption tracking,
b. a GPS rover receiver with its associated antenna and cables, high-speed processor
and communications link capable of, at least, a 1 second update rate;
c. the location will be the same as for a code phase tracking DGPS system;
d. the processor will compute the pseudo-range and carrier phase corrections and
format the data for the communications link;
e. the corrections will be formatted in the RTCM SC-104 v.2.1 format (CMR) for
transmission to the rover receiver.
M-13
451
Communications Link
a. the carrier phase positioning system requires a minimum data rate of 4800 baud and differs
in the volume of data which has to be transmitted from the code phase tracking DGPS
system, which requires a baud rate of 300;
b. this high data rate limits the coverage area for high-frequency broadcast systems;
c. VHF and UHF frequency communications systems are well suited for this data rate.
User Equipment
The user equipment on the survey vessel is:
a. a carrier phase dual-frequency full-wavelength L1/L2 GPS receiver with a built in processor,
capable of resolving the integer ambiguities while the vessel is underway;
b. an associated geodetic GPS antenna, that reduces the effects of multipath on the GPS signal;
c. a communications link to receive data from the reference station;
d. the minimum update rate from the reference station to the vessel(s) should be 1 second;
e. the position output (NMEA 183) carrier phase DGPS data should enable the performance of
real-time navigation and recording of the vessel’s true position needed for survey processing.
RTK systems are not designed to be used for surveys in excess of 20 km from the reference station.
Ambiguity Resolution
a. if the system remains in the RTK mode, real-time sub-decimetre 3D positioning should be
available from the rover receiver;
b. both reference station and the remote station receivers must maintain lock (continuous GPS
data) on at least four satellites;
c. if the number drops to below four satellite, the ambiguities will again be resolved after the
system reacquires lock on a sufficient number of satellites, the system will work in DGPS
mode or Autonomous mode during this period.
4.2 Vertical Control and Calibration
4.2.1. General Description
The datum to which depths are to be reduced is fundamental to any bathymetric survey and the Hydrographic
Specification will contain full details of how this is to be established together with details of established
benchmarks. If the datum is not defined, the existing Chart Datum should be used if at all possible.
The necessity to either establish a new datum or to transfer datum should be carefully considered, any new or
transferred datum must be related to the local survey datum through existing or newly established
benchmarks, for which full details should be recorded and rendered to the Hydrographic Office. Particular
care is required for surveys in rivers and river estuaries; guidance is available in the Admiralty Tidal
Handbook Volume 2.
Using the data supplied with the Hydrographic Specification, the location for tidal stations should be
determined. If conducting a resurvey, the tide station should be established in the position of the old station if
at all possible. If multiple stations are required the distance between stations should not be too great and in
any case no more than 10 miles. The Hydrographic Specification will provide guidance on the placement of
offshore gauges.
M-13
452
Data to assist in the creation of a co-tidal chart will be included in the Hydrographic Specification. A co-tidal
and co-range chart should be produced as described in chapter 5.
Pre-calibrated tide poles and gauges should be established at the desired locations. The tide poles should be
connected to the sounding datum via the land levelling system and witness marks installed as a future means
of quick visual check on the integrity of the pole. If no local benchmarks are available, for whatever reason,
at least 2 new marks should be established and their details fully recorded.
A comparison of tide pole and tide gauge readings over a 25 hour period should be taken to both establish
sounding datum on the gauge and to ensure its correct operation. Thereafter checks should be conducted at
regular intervals during the survey.
Calculation of Mean Sea Level (MSL) using 39 hours of observation should be conducted at the beginning
and end of the survey. Due to daily atmospheric and weather influences, results should be within 0.3 metres
of MSL quoted in the Tidal Tables, which will provide additional confidence in the observed tidal data.
When an established gauge is used, the setting must always be checked independently to ensure that the zero
corresponds to the stated figure.
Observed tidal data should be inspected each day to ensure that the observations meet the Hydrographic
Specification standards. Whenever possible continuous tide readings should be obtained for the entire
duration of the survey. Where continuous readings are not obtained, care should be taken at the start and end
of each survey period with co-tidal time differences to ensure that the tidal data covers sounding operations.
4.2.2 Tidal Modelling for RTK Surveys
The survey area must have details of an appropriate tidal datum to meet the requirements of the project to
be undertaken. The reason for establishing a tidal datum in the survey area is to update knowledge of
MLLW (or Chart) Datum and to enable the benefits of RTK DGPS technology to be realised by
performing the survey without using tide gauges.
The main requirements are:
a. perform wide area GPS static surveys in the selected area;

b. install sufficient tide gauges in the area to obtain details of tidal datum at these gauge
sites computed form long observation periods of data;
c. perform GPS tidal measurements in the survey area at the same time to obtain a
comparable data set of GPS water measurements against conventional tide gauge
measurements;
d. anchor a survey vessel fitted with a RTK Rover Receiver for 25 hour periods in
sufficient locations to generate intermediate datum points within the area, to allow
correlation between the conventional tide gauge methods and the GPS tidal datum
method, and to check any changes in ellipsoid heights between the RTK stations and
the gauge sites over a full tide cycle of 28 days;
e. use a suitable software configuration in the hydrographic survey package which
allows for the ellipsoid separation values to MLLW to be used to compute tidal height
measurements from the waterline of the survey vessel.
M-13
453
The whole project area must be related to the tidal measurements from the nearest primary tide gauge
used to measure the Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) for the area, also a reference is needed to
incorporate tidal datum measurements performed in the survey area. The GPS ellipsoid reference frame
and the local vertical datum must be used over the entire survey area.
Tidal Datum Diagrams
Two different tidal data can be realised:
a. a traditional tidal relationship for the area is represented by the Mean Lower Low
Water Tide Surface relative to the local vertical datum, which must provide the
MLLW reference with an acceptable tolerance (standard S-44) and should
theoretically be parallel to the local geodetic reference surface in absence of currents;
b. an ellipsoidal tidal datum diagram for the area is represented by the Kinematic GPS
MLLW Tide Surface obtained from the ellipsoid height values.
The Ellipsoid Height Surface values and the GPS reference station used to measure the ellipsoid-MLLW
separation enables Kinematic GPS hydrographic surveys to be conducted without the use of tide gauges.
Location of the GPS Reference Station
A permanent GPS reference station (Figure 7.11) must to be established close to the shoreline for
hydrographic surveys in harbours and related approach channel areas. An antenna height h1 in meters
(negative) should be entered into the GPS receiver during GPS hydrographic surveys. If the GPS
reference station antenna is moved, the value is invalid. If the antenna must be moved, the vertical
difference ΔH between the bottom of the antenna and the reference benchmark must be re-measured and
confirmed that the benchmark is (ellipsoid height h2 in meters) below the ellipsoid. Levelling runs starting
from the benchmark should be conducted through the old antenna location and the new antenna location.
M-13
454
WGS 84 Reference Ellipsoid

Local Vertical Datum/ellipsoid separation
h1 h2
Broadcast
antenna Bench
Mark
ΔH
H2
H1
GPS Reference
Station antenna
Local Geodetic reference surface (MSL)
Fig. 7.11 “RTK DGPS reference station parameters”
h1 = ellipsoid height of GPS antenna below the Ellipsoid WGS 84 surface

h2 = ellipsoid height of benchmark below the Ellipsoid WGS 84 surface
H1 = orthometric height of GPS antenna above Local Geodetic reference surface (VD)
H2 = orthometric height of benchmark of the Local Geodetic reference surface (VD)
ΔH = vertical difference between the bottom of GPS antenna and the reference benchmark measured
by geometric levelling
Resultant RTK DGPS Elevation Accuracy
The resultant absolute project accuracy is estimated to be less than 10 cm. The absolute accuracy refers
to the MLLW relative to the Local Geodetic reference vertical datum. A local project modelling of the
ellipsoid-geoid separation should be attempted for the project. A suitable computer program should used
by entering the surveyed horizontal positions to compute the Local Geodetic reference/ellipsoid WGS 84
separations.
Real Time Kinematic Measurement at Sea
The GPS antenna phase zero measurement down to the water line of the vessel is the most important
vertical measurement on the survey vessel. In a static condition, the measurement is as shown in Figure
7.12. Underway the vessel motion through the water will change these figures, however vessel squat is
not entered as a correction in the survey system as the transducer depth is reduced by the same amount the
antenna height is reduced.
M-13
455
WGS 84 Reference EllipsoidEllipsoid
Ellipsoid
Ellipsoid Height (from GPS) Chart datum
Separation
(by tidal study)
Height of GPS antenna above water (fixed )
Height of tide above Chart datum

MLLW Chart datum
Fig. 7.12 “Real Time Kinematic measurement on survey vessel”
Survey Procedures, Test and Processing
a. Conventional method:
i. a number of established acoustic tide gauges should be running and

downloaded to produce a time series from the data sets, which should be
referenced to the station numbers;
ii. the gauge data should be used to eliminate actual time differences in the area
from average time differences between the gauges;
iii. resultant average error when using one tide gauge should be appreciated, the
maximum distance at which the data is valid and where it does not exceed
standards listed in S-44 4th Edition 1998;
iv. the separation distance between gauges should not normally exceed double
maximum distance highlighted in iii above.
b. RTK DGPS carrier phase method:
i. the use of tide gauges during the hydrographic survey are not required;
ii. a MLLW surface should be generated by suitable software from the tidal datum
diagram;
iii. the survey vessel must be equipped with a GPS Rover Receiver capable of
applying OTF GPS carrier phase corrections received from Reference Station;
iv. vessel data (layout, draft, squat etc) must be obtained from conduct of reference
measurements on the survey vessel.
A test on the RTK GPS Tides separation value must be performed, creating a difference ellipsoid/MLLW
matrix by suitable software. A sufficient number of cross-section lines must be run in an area between
the two nearest acoustic tide gauge sites, which are recording tidal data.
M-13
456
c. Two survey processing methods are possible:
i. the conventional method uses the horizontal GPS co-ordinates only (and not the
vertical one) and the reduced depths relative to the MLLW will be obtained
applying the tide gage data to the raw soundings;
ii. RTK GPS method generates an accurate measurement of depths related to the
GPS antenna height without observing tidal measurement data. The GPS
depths are directly referred to the Kinematic GPS MLLW Tide surface. A
random number of depths from each line should be selected for comparison
with the GPS depths reduced by the tide gauge data.
4.3 Environmental Observations
The direction and rate of the tidal stream should be observed wherever it is of navigational significance and
where there is no evidence that observations have been made previously. Positions, and full requirement, for
observations will be articulated in the Hydrographic Specification but additional stations should be included
if considered necessary.
Observations should be made using a current meter, current profiler or a floating log-ship. Observations
should be made at a depth appropriate to the average draught of shipping using the area or as directed.
Observations should not be taken during abnormal weather conditions.
In predominantly semi-diurnal areas, observations should be conducted over a single period of 25 hours at
Springs. In areas where the diurnal equality is large, 30 days observations, using a current meters to enable
harmonic analysis to be conducted, are required. Should it not be possible for such protracted observations to
be taken then sufficient measurements should be obtained to enable a description to be inserted in the Sailing
Directions and tidal stream arrows to be shown on the chart.
In addition to standard observations, information of a less formal nature may be available from local sources,
especially if it may affect low-powered vessels or yachts. Data obtained should include the estimated
maximum rates at Springs and the directions of tidal streams assessed by the best possible means. In areas of
strong tidal streams, especially in the vicinity of banks, rocks shelves and in narrow passages, eddies and
overfalls may occur which can be of considerable significance especially to small, or under-powered craft.
The limits of these phenomena should be fixed, at Springs, on both directions of the tidal stream.
The initial observations of sound velocity should be conducted to allow determination of the spatial and
temporal variations across the entire survey area. A grid of observation points should ensure representative
sampling is conducted over the whole survey area in a methodical and timely fashion. This data, together
with other environmental factors such as climate, fresh water inflow, any seasonal variations and seabed
topography, will determine the frequency at which SV profile observations are conducted. The use of moving
vessel profilers, undulating profilers and hull mounted probes will reduce the need for static observations to
be performed; however water depth and vessel size may limit the ability to make use of such equipment.
There are set intervals at which SV data should be obtained and applied, guidance should be provided in the
Hydrographic Specification and by the Hydrographic Office. The importance of correct SV when using
MBES can not be understated.
M-13
457
4.4 Line Guidance
General Description
In positional terms, the process of data acquisition can be summarized in Figure 7.13. Once line data base
and direction have been decided the surveyor needs to know his position along the selected line at all
times.
a1 a2
b
c
fixes
Course made good
Course
steered
Wind
or
stream
Fig. 7.13 “Sounding lines and related track control”
a. The decision on line orientation and spacing for methodical sounding of an area will be
influenced by the equipment to be used. Figure a1 depicts Singlebeam Echo Sounder
(SBES) with closely spaced lines crossing the depth contours at right angles, Figure a2
illustrates Multibeam Echo Sounder (MBES) or Side Scan (S/S) Sonar with lines spaced to
have a minimum overlap parallel to the depth contours;
M-13
458
b. Make good the selected track;
c. Determine the actual track made good, the vessel’s position is fixed at set intervals with the
track followed assumed to lie along the line joining the fixes;
A traditional EPS position is updated continually and, by observing a track plotter or left/right indicator,
the slightest deviation from the chosen track can be detected and corrected. Further, the track plotter
record, if marked to show time intervals along the track, enables the precise plotting of other acquired
data. Visual fixes, on the other hand, are periodic events and the assumption that positions at times other
than the fix instants will lie on the lines joining fixes will be increasingly erroneous as the interval
between fixes increases. Sextant, theodolite, and total station fixes conducted during a harbour survey,
may be taken at intervals of a few seconds and the departure from the intended track can be controlled by
transit (as is in the above example) or by a variety of other methods.
Modern EPS and satellite fixes are taken every second or less, providing continuous positional
information connected to a left/right indicator or to an automated data acquisition system, which offers a
means of determining, in real time, the ship’s course and speed over ground, with an accuracy directly
related to the chosen positioning system.
In surveys of approximately 25 km2 or less, seabed acoustic transponder arrays, positioned and laid using
conventional positioning methods, can be used in conjunction with echo-sounder or sonar ranging to
provide continuous positional information and, consequently, control of track.
Visual Line Guidance
When visual fixing methods are used, the ship’s track is almost invariably plotted manually, with lines
joining fix positions representing the track followed by the vessel. Therefore, the fixing interval and
vessel speed are selected that the fixes are sufficiently close (about 3-4 cm. apart on paper) for
inaccuracies to be assumed negligible at the scale of the survey (i.e. departures of the vessel from the line
joining fixes will be unplottable). Line control during survey operations is usually achieved
independently.
In the most difficult case of the off-shore survey with no visible shore control, track guidance will be by
compass or better gyrocompass. This is never entirely satisfactory except on very small scale surveys,
course adjustment being necessarily delayed until the fix has been plotted. An alternative method of line
guidance in these circumstances is to steer the vessel around the arc of a fixed angle subtended between
two marks or following a circular/hyperbolic LOP of a traditional EPS chain. These methods are superior
to compass/gyrocompass courses but they can be difficult on large scale surveys with shore marks
relatively close to the survey area and where the arcs are of small radius requiring constant, large
variations of course. Now days, in off-shore surveys, GPS or EPS techniques are exclusively used.
Other methods for visual line guidance and track control are:
M-13
459
a. Natural transits – by keeping an object near the shore line with another further inshore in the
direction of the track to be steered, the helmsman should be able to maintain the line more
easily and accurately than by compass course. Any suitable feature may be used (bushes,
fence or telegraph posts, huts, parts of buildings etc.), the transit marks should be spaced far
enough apart, about one third the length of the survey line, to offer sufficient sensitivity.
b. Artificial transits – the same principles apply as for natural transits; artificial marks, placed
to meet the required line spacing, enable more precise steering and may be essential for large
scale work off a barren shore; this method is particularly useful when undertaking large scale
harbour and wharf surveys, where transits at right angles can be erected to provide line
guidance and fixes at set intervals to meet the survey requirements;
c. 180° collimator prism – this robust and simple instrument enables the helmsman to sight
forward and back marks simultaneously so that, in harbour or river surveys, the vessel can be
steered along the line joining points on opposite banks.
d. Direction from shore – the direction of the intended line is taken off the plot by station
pointer as an angle from a reference object or directly from the field sheet by intersection of
LOPs of a lattice. The required direction is then observed by theodolite or sextant with the
vessel directed along the line by the shore observer using hand flags, lights or radio
communications link. When surveying across a river, basin or berthing area, the shore
observer can sight an object on the opposite shore on the line to be run, enabling him to
follow the vessel’s progress by eye.
e. Starring – by planning the survey lines as radial lines centred on a shore mark, that mark
may form the front mark of a transit, the helmsman picking up a new (natural or artificial)
back mark for each successive line. Alternatively the “direction from shore” method may
be used, the shore observer having to occupy only one station. This method is particularly
suitable for surveying around headlands and promontories.
EPS Line Guidance
Control may be achieved simply by planning the survey lines along either the range circles or range
difference hyperbolae depending on the type system in use. If the lines are steered along pattern lane
readings, any departure from the line is immediately obvious, and the vessel may be fixed at the
intersection of the line by a second pattern. In a hyperbolic pattern the lines and the fixing intervals will
diverge or converge but lane expansion is usually negligible. Allowance may be made for lane
expansion, either by changing the pattern intervals used or by running interlines to maintain minimum
spacing of lines. A left/right indicator will show the vessel’s position relative to the line and provides
clear guidance to the helmsman.
Almost all manufacturers of short and medium range EPS systems offer the facility of track plotter as
peripheral equipment, which is particularly useful when lines cannot be run along lane boundaries as is
often the case in dredging or pipe laying work. The lattice can be plotted out and the selected line
followed by a plotter pen, fixes may be marked on the plotter track as a check but it is more usual to keep
a separate manual plot since the lattice is often distorted on the track plotter, some types of lattice are
shown as a rectangular grid and the required scale of the survey will rarely be that of the plotter.
M-13
460
Automated Line Guidance
Appendix 4 of Chapter 7 (page 8 and 9) outlines a typical automated hydrographic systems configuration
for an Operation Room of a survey ship and the general hardware configuration on a survey boat.
In general the hardware configuration of an automated hydrographic data acquisition system is similar on
both survey ship and survey boat, with a suitable hydrographic data acquisition software to control,
manage, acquire and store in a specific survey data format digital data from the positioning system and
echo-sounder system (SBES/MBES/SSS). Modern hydrographic data acquisition software should
provide a helmsman display allowing the vessel to be steered, either manually or automatically, along
pre-planned survey lines.
Fig. 7.14 “Video image displayed from acquisition software”
Figures 7.14 and 7.15 show some typical video image suitable for a helmsman display providing the
following information:
a. the survey line followed by the ship geo-referenced with the real time position updated at 1
second intervals;
b. a left/right indicator;
c. digital information received and managed by the acquisition software (position co-ordinates,
depths, COG, heading, SOG, line number and fixes, distances from start and end line, etc.).
M-13
461
All this information allows the helmsman and the surveyor to control and monitor the acquisition process
along the selected survey line to cover the area. The acquisition software operator manual should contain
all the instructions and procedures to manage the automated track control, which in general is
conceptually similar for every software manufacturer.
Fig. 7.15 “Video image displayed from acquisition software”
4.5 Check Lines
Crosslines should be run, at the beginning of the survey, perpendicular to the main sounding lines and,
whenever possible, at a different stage of the tidal cycle and in good sea conditions. Sufficient sonar
information from crosslines should be gathered to enable a statement to be made in the RoS of the extent of
sand ripples in the survey area and their direction.
Sounding crossovers should be compared as the survey progresses as a check against gross errors, co-tidal
modelling error or equipment malfunction. On-line MBES displays should be used to verify the repeatable
performance of sounding by monitoring adjacent swathes; this should also be used to ensure that the coverage
and swathe overlaps are being maintained, additional lines should be run to fill any gaps in coverage.
4.6 Main Lines
The sonar sweep type should be articulated in the Hydrographic Specification, which should also detail the %
coverage, % overlap and object detection criteria to be achieved. Careful inspection of the Hydrographic
Specification limits and those of adjacent modern surveys is required to ensure that there are no gaps between
them.
M-13
462
When conducting sonar and sounding lines concurrently, a careful balance must be maintained between the
conflicting requirements. Every effort must be made to ensure that there are no gaps in the sonar sweep and
therefore it will generally be necessary to subordinate the needs of bathymetry to those of sonar. Additional
sounding only lines may be required to assist with the delineation of contours and critical features, where line
keeping error is >25% of line spacing, the gaps should be filled with additional lines.
An a priori sounding error budget/estimation should be created and compared to the Hydrographic
Specification requirements. If significant environmental variance is encountered or changes to equipment are
made to those initially used, the error budget/estimation process should be repeated and these new results
used as the basis for comparison.
Main survey line spacing, direction and sounding speed should run to meet the requirements of the
Hydrographic Specification and the laid down criteria. The optimum and maximum survey speeds should be
assessed taking into account the depth range and systems in use for the survey; the maximum ping rate and
range scale should be utilised commensurate with the depth of water. Normally sounding lines should be run
perpendicular to the general direction of contours; however sonar lines should be run within 20º of the
prevailing tidal stream or current. In areas of strong tidal flow, a direction much less than 20º may have to be
adopted to ensure that the sonar towfish follows the ship’s track.
When surveying with MBES only, line orientation and spacing will be dictated by the criteria detailed in the
Hydrographic Specification and the customer requirements. Object detection and thus data density will
determine % overlap between adjacent swathes, which will be a function of water depth; thus line spacing
will be influenced by water depth, data density and objection detection criteria and % overlap, which will
give the % coverage achieved. It is most likely that line spacing will vary across the survey area, particularly
if there are marked differences in depths; careful monitoring during survey operations will be required to
ensure the desired objectives are being met.
Fix interval and logging intervals should be set as required by the scale of the survey and the survey
processing system in use.
When using SBES, additional sounding lines should be run at standard spacing perpendicular to the contours
from the 10 metre contour into the shore in order to determine the 5 and 2 metres contours and the drying
line. Additional lines should be run parallel to and at distances of 2, 5 and 10 metres off jetties or wharves.
When sounding over sandwaves, operations should take place following periods of calm weather and neap
tides when sandwave amplitudes are greatest. Where possible re-surveys of sandwave areas should follow
the same tracks to detect changes in sandwave profiles.
Care should be taken delineating the drying line, particularly with regard to off lying banks, rocks and shoals,
as the position of such features may have international legal implications. When surveying within harbours
and boat havens, drying heights and the location of foul ground, in areas where small craft anchor or take the
ground, should be accurately delineated.
Whenever a survey includes a channel, recommended track or leading line in restricted waters, it should be
swept by sonar. Allowance during such sweeps should be made to accommodate the largest vessels likely to
use these tracks paying particular attention to turning areas and where a track changes course.
M-13
463
Regular checks should be conducted to ascertain sonar performance, suggested occasions are:
a. On first streaming;
b. Once per day when operating in areas of featureless seabed;
c. After maintenance or repair;
d. After changing towfish or fins;
e. If the performance is in any doubt.
If it appears that the sonar system is not working to its maximum range, due either to water conditions or to
material inadequacies which cannot be rectified, the sonar sweep should be modified to ensure complete
coverage.
A magnetometer should be deployed throughout the basic sonar sweep to provide additional evidence of the
existence of ferrous metal on or below the seabed.
It is of utmost importance that the sweep is thorough, that no gaps appear in it, and that every significant
seabed feature or artificial obstruction is located.
4.7 Inter-lines and Investigations
Items in the supplied list of wrecks requiring a disproving search should be searched for out to a radius of 2.5
miles from the listed position. The limit of the area of this search may extend outside the given limits of the
Hydrographic Specification; however such an extension is essential to avoid the anomaly of having a PA
wreck lying inside an area considered to be fully surveyed. Ensure that any disproving search areas lying on
the outer edge of the survey area are covered; additional lines should be planned to run outside the area in
order to ensure complete insonification of the area with an appropriate overlap.
Careful note should be taken of the 500 metre safety zone around seabed installations and pipe laying
operations when surveying in or near oilfields or exploration areas to ensure the safety of any towed
equipment.
For an object charted PA, the sonar search should be conducted in 2 directions at right angles and extend to at
least 2.5 miles from the datum position. If there is a high degree of confidence that the initial search in one
direction was entirely thorough and that the sonar equipment was operating satisfactorily, consideration may
be given to dispensing with the search in the second direction.
Objects whose positions have been previously established, but which cannot be found during the survey, need
a very detailed investigation to disprove them. Where such objects fall within the survey area and a sonar
search is completed to a radius of ½ mile around the listed position, this will be considered sufficient. A
magnetometer should also be deployed. When there is no doubt about the geographical position of a wreck
after many repeat surveys, the above radius may be reduced. Consideration should be given to the use of a
wire sweep.
Each contact should be closely examined using sidescan sonar; should the contact be confirmed, its position
and least depth by close sounding should be established. A minimum of 4 good runs, comprising 2
perpendicular pairs, should be achieved. In the case of wrecks, one pair of tracks should be parallel to the
axis of the wreck and one pair perpendicular to it.
Data regarding the contact can be obtained from the use of sonar, echo sounder, magnetometer, wire
sweeping, diver or a combination of these. Each contact should have the following detail:
M-13
464
a. Position;
b. Least depth;
c. Nature of the object;
d. Length, breadth and orientation;
e. Depth, length and orientation of scour;
f. Debris field length and orientation;
g. Strength of magnetic field.
Examination of the supplied wreck list may aid identification of the object; however caution should be
exercised in too freely linking newly discovered wrecks with those contained in the wreck list. Disproving
searches may still be necessary in charted positions. The use of divers may be helpful in identifying wrecks
and reporting their state and attitude; in particular, they may be able to locate high points, which may not
have been distinguished on the echo sounder or sonar.
The least depth over wrecks and obstructions must be established, in certain circumstances this will require
the use of wire sweeping, which should be conducted after the position, size, orientation and probable least
depth have been determined by sonar and echo sounder. Wire sweeping should be considered in the
following circumstances:
h. As directed in the Hydrographic Specification for specific wrecks;

h. If the least depth is likely to be less than 40 metres;
h. Where depths around the wreck are significantly different from those charted;
h. When salvage/dispersal work has taken place since the last survey;
h. Sonar indication of protruding masts and structures;
h. Areas charted as foul within an anchorage;
h. Wrecks in areas of strong tidal streams and seabed mobility;
h. Where the position of the wreck is significantly different from that charted.
Care should be taken to ensure that the whole area of the wreck is covered by the wire sweep, albeit in several
laps, and that there are no gaps between the sweeps. It is not sufficient to cover only the areas which appear
to be high points on the sonar.
Particular attention should be paid to the sounding of depths <40 metres, where the least depth should be
obtained over all seabed features. Interlines should be run in depth <40 metres unless the seabed is flat and
featureless and no dangers are shown to exist by complete coverage by high definition towed sidescan sonar
or MBES.
4.8 Ancillary/miscellaneous Observations
Seabed samples should be obtained at regular intervals throughout the entire survey area. Additional samples
should be taken in all likely anchorages, on all banks, shoals and seamounts, particularly where these are
likely to be unstable, and in the channels between them. Approximately 10% of the samples obtained should
be retained for rendering with the final survey.
Seabed samples should normally be obtained throughout the survey area prior to commencing the area sonar
sweep to provide a method of ground truthing the sonar picture and to enable more accurate interpretation for
seabed textures.
Before arrival in the survey all fixed and floating navigation marks and aids should be identified from the
largest scale charts, List of Lights and List of Radio Signals. On arrival all uncharted or listed navigation
marks and aids should be identified.
M-13
465
The position of each new fixed or floating navigation mark and any suspected of being out of their
charted/listed position should have its position determined; floating marks should be fixed on the full ebb and
flood tides, however if an unambiguous position of the central mooring sinker/anchor can be obtained from
swathe bathymetry, it is permissible to quote this as the charted position.
For lit navigational aids the following should be recorded:
a. The height of the focal plane;

b. Light and sound characteristics;
c. Light sectors and obscured arcs;
d. The structure shape and colour;
e. The top mark shape and colour.
Colour photographs of all marks should be taken for inclusion in Sailing Directions.
Harbour authorities should be consulted over changes found to navaids to determine if such changes are
permanent or temporary. Details of any planned changes should be obtained.
The details of port radio operations, including Ship Reporting Systems (VTS, VTM, VTIS, etc), radio pilot
services, radio navigation aids (including (Aero) radio beacons, radar beacons, etc), coast radio station
services (ie. public correspondence details, navigational warnings and weather information broadcasts,
schedules, etc), GMDSS facilities, together with Search and Rescue procedures, are to be obtained.
Every opportunity should be taken to obtain details of natural phenomena during the course of the survey.
Such phenomena includes:
a. Deep scattering layer is the biological layer, consisting of plankton, and other small marine
organisms, and the larger fish that feed on them. Certain of these have swim bladders which
respond to echo-sounder and sonar transmissions, causing scattering of the sound waves, which
may have considerable affect on sonar operations. Reports of the phenomenon are therefore
important and should be rendered;
b. Marine bioluminescence is caused chiefly by marine animals varying in size from microscopic
organisms to quite large fish, squid and jellyfish. It is more commonly encountered in warm
waters than in cold, and is of considerable interest to marine biologists and military scientists.
Reports on the phenomenon are therefore important and should be rendered;
c. Discoloured water is generally recognised to be almost always biological in origin. Water

samples and secchi observations from such areas are of considerable interest and should be
obtained and reported;
d. Marine life reports should be made to cover whale movements and those of other marine
mammal species, which are of considerable interest in anti-submarine warfare and to marine
biologists. The presence of commercial fishing activity in the survey area is of importance as the
sound generated by engines and deployed fishing gear may significantly affect ambient noise
levels. Also the occurrence of a fishing fleet may indicate the presence of large fish populations;
sound scattering caused by shoals of fish may inhibit sonar performance. Sightings should be
included in the RoS.
M-13
466
5. COASTLINE DELINEATION
5.1 Coastlining General
The accurate delineation of the coastline (shoreline) and coastal features is an essential feature of a
Hydrographic Survey, since the mariner is often required to fix his position by bearings and angles or ranges
to promontories and similar features on the coastline. Generally, in hydrographic surveying, the coastline is
defined with respect to a HW datum.
The coastline, except in the most rapid and cursory surveys, must always be walked over in the field when its
nature permits. Many small river mouths and streams have been missed by the practice of taking a boat along
the coast and only landing at various discreet locations.
In some instances, adequate land survey maps based on modern air photography or satellite imagery will
provide data which can be used to assist in plotting the coastline. Occasionally air photography will be flown
specially for a survey and an air “photo plot” produced at the appropriate scale. This however does not
obviate the need to walk the coastline in the field.
All land survey maps and air photo plots should be checked in the field before use is made of them on the
Bathymetric Sheet and Tracings to Accompany. Where no maps are suitable, the coastline must be properly
surveyed with key features being fixed by a regular method dependant upon the scale of the survey.
A surveyor delineating the coastline, even when checking a map or photo plot, should plot the Drying Line as
best as possible and should always note the nature of the foreshore. The best way to find the Drying Line is
by reduced soundings but every part of the foreshore should, if possible be seen at least once at low water in
order to see whether there are dangers which might have escaped attention. This is particularly necessary
where the range of the tide is great.
5.2 Coastal Details Required
The surveyor should carry out the following tasks:
a. Delineate and fix the coastline by the best methods available;

b. Fix and describe all objects CONSPICUOUS and Prominent to the mariner, which are not
already fixed, and check existing marks/features on charts and publications are positioned and
described correctly, even though they may be a little inland;
c. Fix and describe or indicate on the chart all objects and features of the coastline which would
assist the mariner to fix himself and identify the coastline. In large scale surveys this will
include very minor detail which can only be seen close inshore;
d. Measure and estimate the heights of all such features, some features can be described in general
terms such as “Low red cliffs, 5 to 6 metres high”;
e. Fix all islands, visible offshore dangers and obtain their heights, also fix adjacent floating marks
(buoys not on chart);
f. Describe the composition of the beach between the low water line (drying line) and the high
water line as well as above the high water line. The appropriate symbols should be inserted on
the Bathymetric Sheet;
M-13
467
g. Indicate established landing places along the coast. Fix and describe groynes, sewer outfalls and
anything that might constitute a danger to landing. Piers and jetties should also be fixed and a
full description obtained, which should include type of structure, depths alongside, height of
deck above the HW datum and facilities available;
h. Details of harbours should be obtained giving berthing facilities and supplies available, this
information is to be included with the Sailing Directions;
i. Where appropriate, correct spelling of place names should be obtained from reliable local
sources and checked with names shown on existing maps and charts & publications.
In addition the surveyor may concern himself with topographical detail near the coast. The amount of detail
will depend on the time available, the scale of the survey and whether topography is going to be obtained by
another field party or by other means, such as air photography.
5.3 Detail Of Concern To The Mariner
CONSPICUOUS objects/marks. - Mariners use bearings to peaks, churches, chimneys, windmills, masts,
permanent buildings etc. They will be visible from quite a distance offshore.
Prominent marks. – Again, Mariners will use bearings to peaks, churches, chimneys, windmills, masts,
permanent buildings etc. These marks will be visible from quite close to the foreshore/coastline.
Headlands, Islands, Offshore features. - Mariners use bearings to left and right tangents and vertical heights
to cliff tops etc.
Harbour and Port facilities. - Determine dimensions and heights of jetties, orientation and depths alongside,
type of construction, mooring and berthing facilities, small craft facilities, visiting craft details, marinas, yacht
clubs, fuelling berths etc.
Principle Land Features:
a. Natural Objects - Hill summits, rivers, lakes, marshes, woods, contours etc.
b. Artificial Objects - Buildings, towns, flag staffs, roads, railways, factories etc.
c. Contours - Sufficient to indicate height and shape of coastal region.
d. Nature of the Foreshore and Near shore Topography - To assist in recognition and in selecting
landing places.
Lights. - Details must be checked in the field and against entry in Light Lists.
Sailing Directions. - Full written descriptions of the coastline and details of port and harbour facilities.
5.4 Topography
Where recent land surveys maps, aerial photographs or plots from photographs are available, they should be
thoroughly checked in the field and any discrepancies recorded.
M-13
468
The topography shown on large scale charts should be also be checked in the field to update detail which is
not normally shown on maps and which is not visible on aerial photos, paying particular attention to coastal
details e.g., beacons, flag staffs, groynes, etc. Charted objects which no longer exist should be recorded,
preferably as deletions on a copy of the chart, which should be forwarded with the results of the survey.
No topographic detail is to be shown on the Bathymetric Sheet unless it has been surveyed in the field, or its
existence and position on a map or air photo plot have been confirmed by the surveyor. Newly surveyed
detail must be included, detail from other sources which is found to be correct may be transferred to the
Bathymetric Sheet, at the surveyor’s discretion to give a balanced, more complete presentation, but it must be
inserted with meticulous care so that subsequent queries concerning its authenticity do not arise.
Where no modern maps or air photography exist, all topographical detail which will be of use to the mariner
must be accurately fixed and shown on the Bathymetric Sheet. In particular, all features that may be used to
fix a ship’s position, whether visually or by radar, should be plotted and, where practical, coordinated.
Unless time and resources are available, effort should not be expended in recording minor topographical
detail of no direct interest to the mariner, or which is not visible from seaward.
Any changes that are found should be reported.
5.5 Delineation Of The Drying Line
The drying line is in general the basis for determining the limits of the territorial sea and associated baselines
and its careful delineation is most important because of the affect it may have on fishery limits, observance of
pollution regulations and the licensing of offshore mineral extraction, as well as on the delineation of
international boundaries. Surveyors should therefore take special care that the drying line of the mainland,
islands and of all drying features, is adequately delineated even though it may be of little interest to the
mariner.
The survey of an area involving drying features must be considered incomplete if the drying line is not
adequately delineated, unless specific instructions are issued to the contrary.
5.6 Heights Of Land Features
The height of all land bordering the coast must be obtained even if the elevation is small, in particular every
small islet and rock which shows above water must have its height noted against it. If there are no summits
available, the heights of the tips of tree or islands must be found and recorded. Similarly the height of all tall
artificial features such as masts, chimneys etc.
Cliffs must have their heights noted, and their colour if in any way remarkable.
Heights of objects should be referred to MSL (or its equivalent), if this is impractical, the actual height of the
object may be shown as a legend. For special purposes or in river surveys, other criteria for the reference
plain may be used.
5.7 Charting The Foreshore
The main concern when charting the foreshore is to fix the position of all dangers which may have been
missed by routine sounding, such as rock outcrops or man made obstructions. Objects that lie beyond the
drying line will have to be intersected. Pipelines or cables prominent on the beach may extend out to sea
beyond the drying line and be a hazard when anchoring. Finally the nature of the foreshore should be
recorded.
M-13
469
5.8 Coastline Overlay
A properly prepared coastline overlay should contain:
a. Title of the Survey. Survey specification number, scale, ship’s name and any other subsidiary
identification;
b. Position of all co-ordinated marks to be used;
c. Grid and Geographical positions pricked and circled in ink with value of at least 2 of each
positions;
d. Diagonal scale;
e. True and magnetic meridians;
f. A note of the value of least plottable distance, which is ¼ mm on paper, regardless of scale (1 :
10 000 = 2½m).
5.9 Use Of Air Photo Plots
An air photo plot of the coastal area within the limits of a Hydrographic survey will sometimes be prepared in
the Hydrographic Office when:
a. Existing mapping of topography is outdated, poor or non-existent;

b. Features of hydrographic interest, eg underwater rocks, are either shown inadequately, or not
included, on topographical maps, and are evident on photography held;
c. Drying heights can be accurately and efficiently established by photogrammetric means.
When an air photo plot has been supplied in support of a survey specification, the following procedure can be
adopted:
a. The photo plot is to be thoroughly checked in the field for errors in photo interpretation, shape
and position. Difficulties experienced in photo plot compilation and discrepancies with existing
data, will be highlighted in the photo plot report that accompanies the photo plot. Special
attention must be given to resolving these differences;
b. Data on the photo plot which has not been verified in the field must not be included on the
Bathymetric Sheet. It should be noted that the water line derived from air photographs rarely
coincides precisely with Chart Datum, especially in areas with gently sloping beaches and there
may be a need to adjust it before insertion on the Fair Sheet;
c. Amendments to the photo plot must be shown by marking corrections on a copy of the photo
plot;
d. When required, air photographs supplied with the plot are to be marked by pricking and
identification on the reverse side, to show additional control established for the survey.
Existing air photography can be of considerable use in coastline delineation. Previously used ground control
points should be checked against the survey reference system, remembering that the flight scale may need to
be expanded to 4 or 5 times to match the survey scale. Note that ground elevation errors in photogrammetry
are about 1/5000 of the flight height whilst horizontal errors are considerably smaller.
When coastline delimitation is the objective, rectilinear strips orientated parallel to the coastline should be
planned. Overlapping strips should include common control points and the flights should co-inside with low
water times.
M-13
470
For large-scale surveys (less than 1: 50 000) where photogrammetry will be used to obtain ground relief and
other topographic details, additional 3d control will be required. Errors in co-ordinated ground control points
should less than half the aerotriangulation errors for points used during photogrammetic interpretation.
For strip aerotriangulation adjustment, 4 planialtimetric (3D) control points are required. Further inner
control points should be added to each strip.
In more complex flights with a large number of parallel strips, the aerotriangulation enables a block
adjustment to be made. The planialtimetric ground control points may be in the order of 5+0.2M (where M =
the model number of the aerotriangulation process). Additional altimetric control points may be required in
areas where accurate heighting of features is required.
For smaller scale surveys (greater than 1 : 50 000) a lesser number of ground control points will be required,
some with only horizontal co-ordinates known. This is also true for satellite imagery.
Photogrammetry or satellite imagery does not negate the need for the surveyor to fully explore the coastline
in the field.
5.10 Coastlining Methods
Whichever method is used, points must be fixed on the HWL so close on paper that detail can accurately be
drawn in between them. Spacing on paper depends, therefore, on the complexity of the coastline.
Typical recording for a traverse using sextant and 10’ pole is detailed below. Similar recording would be
employed when resecting, or using a combination of both methods. Note the diagram shown embraces all
angles and distances on the recording page.
M-13
471
5.11 Plotting The Coastline
It is usual to draw the coastline by plotting the resection fixes or traverse points directly on to a coastlining
overlay, although a millimetric plotting sheet may also be used. It may also be appropriate to compute the
turning points of a traverse and to adjust them prior to plotting. Prick through known co-ordinated points
used to start and close the traverse, the remaining coastline details are then plotted by hand.
The graphic method of plotting a coastline is given below:
a. Plot the points by protraction of angle and distance. It will be found most convenient to use a
large circular protractor of transparent plastic, springbow dividers, pricker and well sharpened
4H pencils. It is important to remember to avoid the use of short zeros on the paper for aligning
the protractor. When plotting rays, ensure that they are drawn longer than required and that
prick holes made at the edge of the protractor are marked so that they can be used again for
aligning the protractor if required. It is important to do this when the reference object is the back
mark of the traverse and therefore the zero for plotting would be very short if the back mark
prickholes were used for aligning the protractor or station pointer. If there is an acceptable
misclosure the traverse should be adjusted graphically. If there is a large misclosure it will often
be found to be due to a single gross error rather than an accumulation of minor ones. The
plotting should be checked carefully before abandoning hope and re-surveying the section in the
field;
b. The intermediate points, tangents and plotting shots are then drawn in from the corrected
positions of the turning points; care must be taken to zero on the corrected positions of the back
marks, drawing lines through them upon which to align the protractor;
c. The detail of the coastline between the intermediate points is then inserted using the sketch map;
air photographs and existing maps are of great assistance as is the information noted at the ends
of lines by boat-sounders;
d. The coastline is then inked-in using the appropriate colours and symbols (see Int 5011). When
depicting cliffs or steep coasts, the base of the cliffs must be correctly charted but the tops can be
drawn far enough inland to permit the pen work to be inserted; similar exaggeration is necessary
with certain other symbols but great care must be taken with those representing low water
features to ensure that the seaward limit is correctly charted.
5.12 Coastline Delineation Report
Coastline survey work should be reported in accordance with Appendix 2 to this chapter, however some of
the more important aspects are detailed below:
a. State the aim of the work, noting whether it was to update an existing chart, for a new chart or
another special purpose. Indicate what other sources of material were used in addition to field
observations by the surveyor on the ground;
b. A brief summary of the methods used and the measurements taken to establish control for the
coastline survey, including any air photo control points;
c. Highlight any particular difficulties encountered and any additional work required; provide an
indication for the time scale before resurvey may be necessary;
d. Provide an assessment of the co-ordination errors of surveyed objects and marks;
e. Describe all new control points established with an indication of life expectancy, detail previous
control points reoccupied and assessed material state; full station descriptions should be
rendered for all points;
M-13
472
f. Comprehensive details of the results obtained should be rendered; all plots, photographic views,
video records, harbour and port information reports, samples obtained and survey records to be
rendered should be listed;
g. The sources from which names have been obtained should be reported, if locally produced
modern maps have been used to confirm names, copies should be forwarded with the Report of
Survey;
h. The survey should comment on the completeness of the survey and indicate where further work
is required.
As with all survey records, it is vital that all coastline survey records are cross-checked to ensure no
anomalies exist and that consistency between quoted details is achieved. All records to be rendered must be
carefully checked and listed to ensure a clear understanding of the survey can be generated back at the
Hydrographic Office.
6. DATA PROCESSING
The care and attention devoted to work in the field must be extended to all aspects of data processing and
to the careful and legible annotation of all original material used to generate the final records. The
underlying principle to be observed in compiling records of any survey is that they must be entirely
intelligible to any person having a sound knowledge of the type of survey concerned. The preparation of
all data in the established manner, neatly, concisely and accurately, is absolutely vital; terminology should
be in accordance with the definitions in IHO Publication S-32.
6.1 Bathymetric
The output of the bottom detection process, when using MBES, is an accurate time and angle of arrival for
each measured depth. These 2 parameters are used as inputs to the ray tracing algorithms which convert them
into an accurate depth and along/across track distance using information about the SV profile to make the
calculation, which is normally carried out in near real time.
The sheer volume of gathered data with MBES invariably means that area based processing is the only
realistic method. SBES can be processed in a similar manner, however line-by-line processing with direct
comparison against the echo trace, if generated, is often more appropriate.
The use of satellite navigation systems has reduced the amount of post-processing and track editing
necessary, however careful online QC of the navigation system output and statistics is vital to ensure that the
positional standards are achieved.
SV column profile data should be obtained at regular intervals during survey operations, particularly if
continuous SV observations are not being acquired and applied. The interval between SV observations will
be determined by the environmental dynamics assessed from the initial temporal and spatial data obtained in
accordance with paragraph 4.4.5.
All algorithms used for data editing should be recorded and included in the RoS to enable a clear
understanding of the processing procedure to be gained by the Hydrographic Office. The smoothing and
filter parameters may be detailed in the Hydrographic Specification or standardised by the Hydrographic
Office, any variations should be justified in the RoS. Excessive filtering and smoothing should be avoided.
The editing and processing procedure must follow a logical path with a clear audit trail to enable all actions
and parameters to be checked and approved, a robust QC routine must be in operation throughout, which
should allow for comparison against previous surveys, published charts or validated survey data, and against
M-13
473
recently obtained adjacent survey data. Careful inspection of the crossline/checkline data should be
undertaken, a statistical plot should be produced and any differences > √2 x sounding error budget should be
investigated.
Observed tide gauge and pole readings should be reduced to sounding datum at the tide station using the
values obtained for each when they were installed. Any co-tidal time and range factors should be applied to
reduce the observed tides to the values at the survey area.
A daily comparison of the tide gauge and tide pole should be carried out by comparing simultaneous
readings. After reduction to sounding datum, simultaneous tide pole and tide gauge readings should be
compared to ensure that the tide gauge was recording correctly.
Reduced tide gauge readings should be plotted and the resulting tide curve compared to the predicted curve at
the tide station to ensure consistency of data and to ensure that the tide gauge was recording correctly. Unless
‘steps’ in tides are expected, curves may be smoother, large or repetitive steps should be noted in the RoS and
the tide gauge checked for any malfunctions.
When using telemetry links with established gauges, a comparison of actual gauge and telemetry values
should be conducted during the 25 hour pole/gauge comparison and then at intervals throughout the survey.
Data density should be aligned with the object detection requirements, which will determine the grid size to
be used. In surveys for navigational charting, shoal bias is the normal criteria; however there are occasions
when mean depth will be appropriate. The Hydrographic Specification and the Hydrographic Office policy
should provide guidance on the requirements.
The Hydrographic Specification should detail the final survey product presentation including contour
intervals; however full use should be made of the numerous visualisation tools available to aid in the
checking and QC of the survey. Some of the visualisation formats are:
a. Sounding plots;
b. Contour plots;
c. Digital colour sounding and contour displays;
d. 3D colour depth surfaces;
e. 3D grey scale sun illuminated surfaces.
If 3D grey scale sun illuminated surfaces are created, the surface should be viewed from 2 perpendicular
directions to highlight any anomalies or artefacts which may need further investigation.
Note should be made of all features and least depths for comparison against sonar records, if obtained. In any
event, an assessment should be made as to whether further investigation is required.
6.2 Seafloor Characterisation
The texture data deduced from the sonar trace or backscatter data will be merged into a mosaic either using
an automated system or by creating a hand drawn seabed texture collector. In both cases interpretation will
be guided by the grid of seabed samples taken earlier in the survey.
Initial detail should include the crests of sandwaves with heights, the positions of obstructions with heights
and the start and end of rock outcrops and pinnacles. Texture detail should be plotted to define the limits of
texture boundaries. Care should be taken to ensure conformity of texture details to previously survey areas.
M-13
474
Instances will occur when additional seabed samples are required to clarify complex seabed texture areas.
Sufficient additional seabed samples should be obtained until confidence has been achieved that the seabed
has been accurately classified.
The quality and totality of sonar coverage should be determined by inspection of:
a. A plot of the ship’s track, inspection will reveal any gaps in coverage due to poor line keeping or
excessive towing speed, these gaps should be re-run;
b. Line quality control data which will indicate whether the maximum tow speed has been
exceeded, areas of excessive should be re-run;
c. Sonar traces should be inspected to ensure that the towfish was deployed at the correct height
above the seabed and that good data was being recorded, any areas with suspect data should be
re-run.
6.3 Feature Detection
Wreckage or artificial obstructions which stand proud of the surrounding seabed may constitute a hazard to
shipping or to submarines navigating over continental shelf areas. All such objects must be located,
examined and recorded.
During the initial sonar sweep of the area, sonar traces must be carefully examined and all contacts likely to
represent obstruction carefully noted. Contacts should be recorded methodically recorded:
a. Sonar trace number;

b. Julian day and time;
c. Contact number (should be consecutively through the survey);
d. Fix details;
e. Port/Starboard channel;
f. Slope range;
g. Layback;
h. Height of towfish above seabed;
i. Assessment of contact;
j. Further action required (ie. investigate, interline, quick look, no further action).
The magnetometer trace and depth data should be carefully examined to provide supporting evidence.
On completion of an examination the records should be carefully checked to ensure that the process has been
conducted thoroughly. The following points should be considered when assessing the thoroughness of a
examination:
a. As long as a wreck, foul or obstruction continues to be a hazard to navigation or other marine

activity, it must appear on the chart;
b. Any objects described as giving ‘non-sub’ echoes or which constitute a ‘foul’ on the seabed must
be found, classified, fixed and recorded; whether dangerous to shipping or not, they must be
disproved;
c. The onus is to classify or disprove every charted wreck, foul, obstruction or contact previously
described as ‘non-sub’; unless disproved beyond doubt, they must remain on the chart.
M-13
475
The satisfactory examination of every significant object located during a survey is a major factor in deciding
whether an area has been fully surveyed.
6.4 Ancillary/miscellaneous Observations
Tidal stream, gathered during the survey via whatever methods, should be assessed for validity and
consistency. Where previous tidal stream data exists, the new observations should be compared to ensure
continuity and uniformity. Where no previous data exists, observations should be inspected to ensure that
they are in agreement with tidal streams experienced during the survey, which can be assessed from
comparisons between the courses and speeds set against the courses and speeds made good.
It is usual for the analysis of observed tidal stream data, for inclusion on charts, to be conducted by the
Hydrographic Office.
The mean position of floating navaids should be calculated from the observed ebb and flood positions, unless
a position of the sinker/anchor can be deducted from the swathe bathymetry.
The position, characteristic, sectors and physical description of each fixed or floating navaid should be
compared against the published chart, the relevant List of Lights and Sailing Directions as a gross error
check. It is important to verify that the derived positions for navaids meet the required standards.
The final list of fixed and floating navaids observed for and checked within the survey area should be
compared with the original listing created from the published charts, List of Lights and Sailing Directions, in
accordance with paragraph 4.8.3, to ensure complete coverage of all navaids.
Any variations from the published data and confirmed with responsible authorities in accordance with
paragraph 4.8.7 should be reported immediately by signal/e-mail to the Hydrographic Office and followed up
with a Hydrographic Note.
The details of port radio operations obtained during the survey, in accordance with paragraph 4.8.8, should be
checked against the relevant List of Radio Signals and Sailing Directions.
Details of any marine life, bioluminescence, secchi, deep scattering layer observations should be rendered.
Details of other features, such as pock marks and brine lakes, and any sediment samples should be given with
a description on how the observations were made.
If ocean fronts, eddies or internal waves have been investigated, details of their locations, the type of feature,
the methods used and the sensors employed should be provided. Comment on how the data has been
rendered and any conclusions made.
6.5 Compliance with the Plan
An assessment should be made of the completeness of the survey and its compliance with the Hydrographic
Specification and the original plan. Any areas which require further investigation, including areas
incompletely surveyed or the Hydrographic Specification requirements have not been achieved, should be
identified and what actions are required to rectify the shortfalls, which may be due to equipment limitations
or physical conditions. Any further work required should be highlighted and recommendations should be
made on how it can be successfully approached in the future.
M-13
476
7. DATA RENDERING
7.1 The Report of Survey
When survey material of any sort is rendered to the Hydrographic Office, it must be accompanied by a report,
in some form or other, of how it was obtained. In a few cases, such as Hydrographic Notes, this may be
relatively brief, but in the vast majority of cases, the Report of Survey forms the core of the survey data, and
should remark on every aspect of the survey and on all other data being rendered with it. For conventional
bathymetric surveys, it is often divided into two parts; an example of their contents is contained at Appendix
2 to this chapter.
The Report of Survey is the principal means by which the Surveyor in charge approves the contents of ALL
survey records and is thus a very important document, and the Surveyor must take considerable care in its
presentation. It must give a clear and comprehensive account of how the survey was carried out, the results
achieved, the difficulties encountered and the shortcomings. Emphasis within Part 1 should be placed on the
analysis of achieved accuracies and whether the specifications called for in the survey specification and IHO
Publication S-44 standards have been met. Part 2 contains the necessary technical discussion to support
opinions expressed in Part 1. It should be borne in mind that it is often just as important to say what was not
done and why, as to say what was done and how.
A thorough Report of Survey can reduce the need for subsequent correspondence between Hydrographic
Office and survey unit, which otherwise may be necessary to elucidate points which have not been covered in
a less exhaustive report. The example at Appendix 2 provides an outline of the material that it is felt
advisable to include along with a format suitable for bathymetric surveys. It is useful to note against any
paragraphs which are not applicable to a particular survey a brief statement of the form ‘No …….
observations were conducted’.
The Report of Survey is as much a fair record of the survey as any other, and must be compiled and present
with as much care, neatness and accuracy. The manner and format in which it is rendered to the
Hydrographic Office will vary according to national requirements.
The Report of Survey and associated survey data will be rendered to the Hydrographic Office where it will
undergo a rigorous validation and appraisal process. It is recommended that a complete copy of the rendered
data should be kept in the survey unit until all queries have been answered. It should be remembered that the
verified Report and data set will be archived and remain as the definitive data source for the creation of future
products.
7.2 Data Requirement
The Hydrographic Specification will articulate the reason for the survey and the primary product requirement
of the customer, ie safety of navigation or cable/pipeline route surveys will be bathymetry driven,
minewarfare and archaeological surveys will be object detection led whilst environmental surveys may be
seabed texture and water column based. The Hydrographic Office will detail what data is to be rendered on
completion of the survey and to what time scale.
7.3 Data Format and Density
Most Hydrographic organisations have detailed standards for data format and data density to meet their
requirements. The Hydrographic Specification will detail any variations to these standards in the data format,
which will depend upon the survey system to be used and the systems available for verification and validation
M-13
477
of the rendered data. The modifications to the data density will be stipulated in the Hydrographic
Specification.
Modern visualisation tools have allowed significantly greater flexibility to the surveyor in data presentation,
both digitally and graphically. Care must be taken to ensure that the inherent cautiousness of hydrographic
surveying is not blinded by the multi-coloured imagery which can be created with relative ease and minimal
human interaction.
7.4 Media Requirement
The Hydrographic Specification will detail in which media the survey data is to be rendered and whether it is
a fully digital survey or if fair graphics are required by the customer. The common media used are:
a. DVD;
b. CD-Rom;
c. DAT Tape;
d. Fair graphics on Ozatex/Cronaflex;
e. Paper records.
Whatever the media, great care should be taken with the transmission and handling to ensure that the data
arrives at its final destination uncorrupted and undamaged. Much of the data will be unique, will form the
basis for amending and maintaining charts and publications until the area is resurveyed (probably very many
years in the future), and will become part of the nation’s archives as public records. It follows that this
material must be afforded the highest degree of security at all times, for to lose a part or all of it would clearly
be very expensive in time, effort and material.
M-13
478
REFERENCES
Edition 1/04 2004 Hydrographic Quality Assurance Instructions UK Hydrographic Office

for Admiralty Surveys
17th Edition 1996 General Instructions for Hydrographic Surveys UK Hydrographic Office
11th Section 1968 Admiralty Manual of Hydrographic Surveying UK Hydrographic Office
Volume 1
1969 to 1973 Admiralty Manual of Hydrographic Surveying UK Hydrographic Office
Volume 2
PP24 (Parts 1 & The Use of Side-scan Sonar for Hydrographic UK Hydrographic Office
2) 1987 Surveying and the Gathering of Bottom Texture
Information
5th edition – 1994 “Hydrographic Dictionary” S–32 International Hydrographic
Organization, Monaco
4th edition – 1998 “IHO Standards for Hydrographic Survey” International Hydrographic
S–44 Organization, Monaco
29 April 1998 “IHO Standards for Hydrographic Survey” International Hydrographic

Supplement to S–44 Organization, Monaco
Draft enclosed in letter IHB File N. S3/7198
1 January 2002 EM 1110-2-1003“Hydrographic Surveying” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Washington.
1 July 2003 EM 1110-1-1003“NAVSTAR Global Positioning U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
System Surveying” Department of the Army,
Washington.
Fourth Edition “Hydrographic Manual” Melvin J. Umbach Rockville,

4 July 1976 Md.
U.S. Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA)
National Ocean Service (NOS)
March 2003 NOS Hydrographic Surveys “Specifications and U.S. Department of Commerce
Deliverables” National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA)
M-13
479
A.A. 2002/2003 “Lezioni di Idrografia teorica ed operativa” Luigi Sinapi

Napoli
1976 “Electronic Surveying and Navigation” Simo H. Laurila
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
New York (USA)
January 1983 “Electronic Surveying in practice” Simo H. Laurila
New York (USA)
1991 “Radionavigation system” Börje Forssell
Prentice Hall International (UK)
Ltd
July 1974 “Sea Surveying” Alam E. Ingham
New York (USA)
M-13
480
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Edition 1/04 2004 Hydrographic Quality Assurance Instructions UK Hydrographic Office

for Admiralty Surveys
17th Edition 1996 General Instructions for Hydrographic Surveys UK Hydrographic Office
11th Section 1968 Admiralty Manual of Hydrographic Surveying UK Hydrographic Office
Volume 1
1969 to 1973 Admiralty Manual of Hydrographic Surveying UK Hydrographic Office
Volume 2
PP24 (Parts 1 & The Use of Side-scan Sonar for Hydrographic UK Hydrographic Office
2) 1987 Surveying and the Gathering of Bottom Texture
Information
PP25 1990 The assessment of the Precision of Soundings UK Hydrographic Office
1998 “La georeferenziazione delle informazioni Luciano Surace
territoriali” Estratto dal "Bollettino di
geodesia e scienze affini"
Prima Edizione – “GPS Principi Modalità e Tecniche di A. Cina
2000 Posizionamento” Celid
Prima Ristampa – “Topografia” L. Costa
2001 Cooperativa Libraria
Universitaria – Genova
Terza Edizione – “Manuale di Idrografia per la costruzione delle Manoia G. Romagna
1949 carte marine Accademia Navale di Livorno
II 3100. “Manuale dell’Ufficiale di Rotta” Istituto Idrografico della Marina,
Quinta Edizione – Genova
1992/Prima
Ristampa – 1998
NorMas FC 1028 “Norme di Massima per i Rilievi Idrografici” Istituto Idrografico della Marina,
Seconda Edizione Genova
– 1978
5th Edition – 1994 “Hydrographic Dictionary” S–32 International Hydrographic
Organization, Monaco
4th Edition – 1998 “IHO Standards for Hydrographic Survey” International Hydrographic
S–44 Organization, Monaco
29 April 1998 “IHO Standards for Hydrographic Survey” International Hydrographic
Supplement to S–44 Organization, Monaco
Draft enclosed in letter IHB File N. S3/7198
M-13
481
1 January 2002 EM 1110-2-1003 “Hydrographic Surveying” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,

Washington.
1 June 2002 EM 1110-1-1004 “Geodetic and Control U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Surveying” Department of the Army,
Washington.
1 July 2003 EM 1110-1-1003 “NAVSTAR Global U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Positioning System Surveying” Department of the Army,
Washington.
31 August 1994 EM 1110-1-1005 “Topographic Surveying” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Washington.
Fourth Edition “Hydrographic Manual” Melvin J. Umbach Rockville,
4 July 1976 Md.
U.S. Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmos-
pheric Administration (NOAA)
March 2003 NOS Hydrographic Surveys “Specifications and U.S. Department of Commerce
Deliverables” National Oceanic and Atmos-
pheric Administration (NOAA)
A.A. 2002/2003 “Lezioni di Idrografia teorica ed operativa” Luigi Sinapi
Napoli
1976 “Electronic Surveying and Navigation” Simo H. Laurila
New York (USA)
January 1983 “Electronic Surveying in practice” Simo H. Laurila
New York (USA)
1991 “Radionavigation system” Börje Forssell
Prentice Hall International (UK)
Ltd
July 1974 “Sea Surveying” Alam E. Ingham
New York (USA)
__________
M-13
482
M-13
483
APPENDIX 1
SURVEY PLANNING AND ESTIMATION GUIDE
PART I PRE-SURVEY ACTIVITY
1. Can the positioning be calibrated and validated near the survey ground?
If not, calibrate as near to the area as possible.
Can a reconnaissance party go in advance? If yes, then time for recce at step 3 will be much
reduced.
2. Estimated time of departure from the base port ..................

Passage time in hours ..........
Passage observations required? Yes/No
Estimated time of arrival at the survey area ..............
NB: Allow time to test and tune sensors on passage.
3. Local liaison and reconnaissance. ...... days

Calibrate positioning system if required.
Can tide gauge(s)/pole(s) be established concurrently?
If yes, cancel step 4.
4. Establish tidal station(s). ....... days
5. Establish sufficient geodetic control. ....... days

(to include GPS observations if required)
and set up navaids to start ship/boat work.
Can this be done concurrently with 3 or 4?
If yes, cancel step 5.
6. Calibrate positioning system within survey limits.

Number of calibration stations ...........
Time per station .............. Total ...... hrs
Total passage between stations ............. hrs
Total......../24 ....... days
7. Obtain first set of sound velocity observations

throughout the survey area.
Can this be combined with navaid calibration?
If yes, cancel 7. ....... days
TOTAL ....... days A*
M-13
484
PART II LINE MILEAGE TOTE
Average length of standard spaced sonar/sounding main lines ......... nm x no of lines .....
Divide by planned speed of advance ...... knts =
time taken ......... hrs
Turning time at end of line ...... mins x no. of lines/60 ....... hrs
subtotal (i) ....... hrs
Repeat for open spaced lines subtotal (ii) ....... hrs
Interlines subtotal (iii)....... hrs
Crosslines subtotal (iv)........ hrs
Other sounding only lines subtotal (v) ........ hrs
SUBTOTAL (ship) ....... hrs
% for shoal examinations ....... add to get TOTAL (ship) ....... hrs
Divide by no. of productive hours per day (any restrictions?)

TOTAL (ship) ....... days B*
Repeat assessment for boatwork TOTAL (boat) ....... days C*
Can boatwork be conducted concurrently with shipwork? If yes, then total C* can be subsumed: (in the plan
include total B or C, whichever is greater, providing boat and ship work are not mutually exclusive).
OR
For oceanographic cruises the calculation will concern the number of observation stations, time to conduct
each 'cast' and transit time between stations. Similarly the above format can be adapted for geophysical
surveys.
M-13
485
PART III OTHER OBSERVATIONS AFLOAT
No of seabed samples ........x time per sample mins/60 =........hrs
Distance between samples ........nm x no /SOA(...Knots) =........hrs
Total/productive hours per day = .......days D*
No of wrecks requiring sweeping by wire..............

No of wrecks swept per day........................... Subtotal .....days
No of wrecks requiring investigation.................

Time per investigation plus transit time.............hrs
Divide by productive hours per day ........ to give Subtotal......days
Repeat for disproving searches Subtotal......days
TOTAL ........days E*
No of tidal stream observations ............
Time per observation plus transit ..........hrs/24 TOTAL.........days F*
No of buoys requiring fixing................

Time per buoys (ebb and flood) plus transit ........
Total time divided by productive hours per day TOTAL ........days G*
Other observations (eg) Photographic Views & Miscellaneous Tasks

TOTAL ........days H*
Total Field Work Afloat B* to H* TOTAL.........days I*
N.B. If the boat can be used for some of these, the total will be reduced by that proportion. Note that a
productive working day for a worked up boat will seldom exceed 6 hours. Similarly if there is more than one
unit available for the survey, the total time taken will be reduced. In this case, it is often the practice to divide
the area into blocks and allocate individual units to blocks, ensuring a suitable overlap for comparison
purposes. Each unit would then go through the detailed planning process for its own block.
M-13
486
PART IV FIELD WORK ASHORE
In addition to the initial geodetic control work ashore, the following should be considered:
Time spent to extend geodetic control .........................days

Time spent to coordinate other objects .........................days
No of miles of coastline to be fixed/miles per day .………............days
TOTAL....…..days J*
If I* is greater than J*, then J* will be subsumed into the time for fieldwork afloat. Careful planning will
reduce the unproductive transit time to land shore parties etc.
Time for post-survey calibration and recovery of equipment .......days K*
TOTAL FIELDWORK = B* + I* (or J if greater)+K* …....days L*
PART V DOWNTIME
There are a number of factors that will increase the time taken to complete the survey. The following list
gives some of the planning considerations, but there may be other relevant issues (e.g. working in pack ice):
Estimate:
Days lost through weather (e.g.Winter 25%? Summer 10%?). …...........days
Days lost through defects (Age/repair state/weather?) ...............days
Days “lost” through planned non-surveying activity ...............days
Days lost through unplanned activities (e.g. 10%) …...........days
TOTAL DOWNTIME ..............days

M*
TOTAL DAYS ON SURVEY GROUND = L* + M* ...............DAYS
TOTAL SURVEY TASK = A + L + M + Passage time to and from survey ground.
__________
M-13
487
PPP
APPENDIX 2
TABLE 1
Horizontal Positioning Systems and Selection Criteria
Allowable for Survey Order

Estimated
Positional Accuracy
Positioning System
Special
in meters (to 95% 1 2 3
confidence level)
Sextant Angle resection 2 – 10 No No Yes Yes
Theodolite Angle Intersection 1–5 Yes (*) Yes Yes Yes
Visual/Range Intersection 3 – 10 No No Yes Yes

Tag line (dynamic)
< 200 meters from baseline 1–2 Yes Yes Yes Yes
> 200 and < 600 metres from baseline 2–6 No Yes (*) Yes Yes
> 600 meters from baseline 6 – 50 No No Yes (*) Yes
Angle/Range Intersection 0.5 – 3 Yes (*) Yes Yes Yes
EDM/Total Station (within 2 Km. from ref.st.) 0.3 – 1 Yes Yes Yes Yes
EDM/Total Station (over 2 Km. from ref.st.) 1–3 No Yes Yes Yes
High Frequency EPS (Microwave or UHF) 2–4 No Yes Yes Yes
Medium Frequency EPS (HF) 3 – 10 No Yes (*) Yes Yes
Low Frequency EPS (LF – Decca) 10 – 150 No No Yes Yes
Very Low Frequency EPS (VLF - Loran) 45 – 310 No No No Yes (*)
STARFIX 5 No Yes (*) Yes Yes
GPS absolute SPS (with S/A up to May 2000) 75 – 100 No No No Yes
GPS absolute SPS (without S/A) 10 – 30 No No Yes (*) Yes
GPS absolute PPS 5 – 15 No Yes (*) Yes Yes

DGPS code phase from local ref. station 2–5
0 Km. < Distance < 2 Km. Yes (*) Yes Yes Yes
2 Km. < Distance < 100 Km. No Yes Yes Yes
DGPS code phase (Radiobeacon/WAAS) 2 – 10
250 Km. < Distance < 350 Km. No Yes (*) Yes Yes
RTK DGPS carrier phase from local ref. st. 0.1 – 1
0 Km. < Distance < 20 Km. Yes Yes Yes Yes
(*) Marginally
__________
M-13
488
M-13
489
APPENDIX 3
TABLE 2
Bandwidth Classification of Electronic Positioning Systems

used in Hydrographic Surveying
Bandwidth Symbol Frequency System

Very Low Frequency VLF 10-30 KHz Omega
Low Frequency LF 30-300 KHz LORAN-C
Medium Frequency MF 300-3000 KHz Raydist, Decca
High Frequency HF 3-30 MHz Fundamental Earth Frequency 10.23 MHz
Very High Frequency VHF 30-300 MHz VOR Aircraft Navigation
Ultra High Frequency UHF 300-3000 MHz Del Norte
L-Band NAVSTAR GPS
Super High Frequency SHF 3-30 GHz (Microwave EPS)
C-Band Motorola
S-Band Cubic
X-Band Del Norte
Visible Light EDM*
Laser Light EDM
Infrared Light EDM, Polarfix
* Electronic Distance Measuring instrument.
TABLE 3
Field application of Electronic Positioning Systems

used in Hydrographic Surveying
Frequency range Type of System Operable distance Field application

Low and Medium hyperbolic phase/ They can reach far They were more suited for long-
frequency range pulse differencing beyond the visible or range navigation purposes or far
microwave horizons offshore geophysical exploration
work.
Super High Microwave systems Generally limited to They are suitable for precise control
Frequency (SHF) (circular phase) line of sight of offshore survey vessels and
range dredges.
The range is adequate to cover most
river, harbour and coastal
construction applications.
Modulated light Electronic Distance Over relatively These systems provide the highest
wave and infrared Measurement limited distances, distance accuracy measurements for
spectrum EDM) instruments usually less than 3 to hydrographic surveys.
(e.g., electronic 5 miles offshore
total stations)
__________
M-13
490
M-13
491
APPENDIX 4
M-13
492
M-13
493
M-13
494
M-13
495
M-13
496
M-13
497
M-13
498
M-13
499
__________
M-13
500
M-13
501
APPPENDIX 5
SPECIMEN REPORT OF SURVEY
ENGLAND, SOUTH COAST
APPROACHES TO DEEPWATER SOUND
SURVEYING VESSEL [Name]
SURVEYED BY [Name of Surveyor]
[Start and End Date of Survey]
1:25,000
REPORT OF SURVEY
[Date of Report] [Survey Reference Number]
M-13
502
CONTENTS
PART 1 - DESCRIPTIVE
Section
1. Introduction
2. Geodetic Control
3. Digital Surveying System
4. Navaids
5. Bathymetry
6. Sonar
7. Seabed Sampling
8. Seabed Topography and Textures
9. Tides and Sounding Datum
10. Tidal Streams
11. Wrecks and Obstructions
12. Lights and Buoys
13. Coastline, Topography, Measured Distances, Conspicuous Objects and Marks
14. Sailing Directions and Nomenclature
15. Radio Stations
16. Ancillary Observations
17. Miscellaneous
M-13
503
PART 1
1. Introduction
1.1 Give start and finish dates. Remark on any general service activities which interrupted
the progress of the survey.
1.2 Give a general statement on the weather, including the seasonal climate and variations
experienced. Comments on weather are essential when surveying unstable, critical areas
which require optimum hydrodynamic conditions to determine the absolute minimum depth
over each feature. Comments are also required on how the weather affected the quality of
the data – e.g. ship motion and heave compensator performance, degradation of sonar
search, stability of navaid in storms, effect of sea conditions on sandwave heights.
1.3 Comment on any extraneous activities (e.g. firing ranges or saturation fishing) which
affected the conduct of the survey. Mention whether the strength of the tidal stream caused
any particular difficulties. Mention any logistic problems.
1.4 Give the overall opinion of the completeness of the survey. Identify any areas which require
further surveying.
2. Geodetic Control
2.1 State how much existing geodetic control was used and explain how any new control was
established; give a general statement on the degree of accuracy achieved and outline any
difficulties encountered in linking to existing control.
3. Digital Surveying System
3.1 State which systems and issues of software were used, if appropriate. Comment on any
enhancements implemented during the survey, giving dates when installed.
3.2 Mention any major difficulties experienced or defects that had a significant impact on the
progress or quality of the survey and venture an opinion of the effectiveness of the
systems used. There is no requirement to include details of minor defects.
3.3 A statement is to be made to the effect that all significant depths detected by the echo
sounder are represented on the digital records, indicating how this has been achieved.
Reasons must be given if this check has not been carried out.
4. Navaids
4.1 State the type and operating modes of the systems used.
4.2 Where a DGPS solution utilises a network of reference stations, comment upon the
reference station network geometry and reference station ranges, with respect to the
survey area. If a single reference station DGPS solution is used in preference to a network
solution state why.
4.3 Describe how and when the systems were calibrated and/or validated.
M-13
504
4.4 Give the Surveyor's opinion of the quality and reliability of the equipment, and the
accuracy’s achieved. Comment upon any periods of poor positioning quality observed.
Include details of any GPS reference station failures or incidences of abnormally high
latency in the delivery of pseudo range corrections.
5. Bathymetry
5.1 State the type of echo-sounder used and its transmission frequencies, especially where dual
frequency sets are used. State the result of ship squat trials conducted. State the type of
heave compensation used and give a brief summary of its performance.
5.2 State the method of obtaining sound-velocity (SV) and the frequency of SV and bar-
check observations; give an opinion of their accuracy. Quote the mean SV used, if
appropriate.
5.3 State the sounding line direction, line spacing and average speed over the ground. For
shoal investigations etc, quote the density of the sounding lines and the seabed footprint
of the echo sounder beam.
5.4 Describe any Leading Lines or Recommended Tracks.
5.5 Give the Surveyor's estimation of the overall accuracy of the soundings, drawing
attention to reasons why the desired accuracy standard may not have been met. Include
an opinion of the thoroughness of the survey with regard to the line density.
(See also paragraph 8 (Seabed Topography and Texture - Comparison with Previous Surveys)
and paragraph 9 (Tides and Sounding Datum - Scrutiny of Cross-line intersections); these will
have a bearing on the estimated accuracy of the sounding, the assessment of the accuracy of the
co-tidal chart, and on the Charge Surveyor's general opinion of the completeness of the
bathymetry and assessment of further work necessary).
6. Sonar
6.1 State the type of sonar used and its transmission frequency.
6.2 Mention the type and frequency of confidence checks carried out. Include the Surveyor's
opinion of the quality and reliability of the sonar equipment.
6.3 State the choice of sonar line direction, line spacing, sonar range, and mean SOA. Give
an estimate of the effect of tidal streams on the lateral position of the towfish and
describe any precautions taken to ensure complete sonar coverage.
6.4 State the allowance made for sonar layback at the ends of lines and whether the extra line
was run outside the required survey area limits to achieve the sonar search specified in
the survey specification.
6.5 Give the Surveyor's opinion of the thoroughness of the sonar coverage and a definitive
statement of the extent of the search achieved.
M-13
505
7. Seabed Sampling
7.1 State the sampling interval and comment upon any particular samples obtained on
interesting features. Describe any reservations the Surveyor may have concerning the
distribution of sediments as portrayed by the samples obtained. Quote the number of
samples retained.
7.2 State the method of sampling used and mention any problems with the equipment.
8. Seabed Topography and Texture
8.1 Give a brief thumb-nail sketch description of the seabed topography of the surveyed area.
State the Charge Surveyor's opinion of all significant features, their nature and
distribution throughout the survey area. Comment on any difficulties experienced in
interpreting the sonar trace when preparing the textures tracing.
8.2 State the reason if unable to investigate a shoal as thoroughly as desired and estimate the
reliability of the least depth obtained; identify the extra work needed to ascertain the
absolute least depth:
e.g.: ‘the shoal was thoroughly examined by echo sounder but due to the likelihood of
a rock pinnacle, it should be wire swept to guarantee obtaining the least depth.
Adverse weather prevented this being completed during the survey.’
8.3 Comment on any areas of less than 40 metres depth which were not interlined.
8.4 Mention dredging activities and spoil grounds.
8.5 Comment on any movement of sandwaves when compared with previous surveys.
8.6 Give the Surveyor's opinion of the comparison with previous surveys and any doubts
about the detection of all existing shoal depths, or recommendations for retaining
previously surveyed depths. If it has not been possible to check and confirm or disprove
every charted feature in the survey area, explain why.
8.7 Where it has proved impossible to sound a stretch of coastline because breakers appear to
be a permanent feature this is to be noted in Annex N.
9. Tides and Sounding Datum
9.1 State where the tidal station was sited and how Sounding Datum was established. For an
established gauge, describe how the setting of the zero was checked.
9.2 Describe any transfer of datum involved and any use made of co-tidal charts.
9.3 Describe any adjustment to the level of the Sounding Datum found necessary during the
course of the survey.
9.4 State the types of tidegauge and/or tidepole used; state over what period observations
were made and whether they were analysed.
M-13
506
9.5 Mention any tidegauge malfunctions and any difficulties in obtaining tide readings such
as impounding or surging.
9.6 Quote the Standard Port used for predicted tides, or explain the use made of harmonic
constants to derive tidal predictions.
9.7 Give the Surveyor's opinion of the accuracy of the levelling used to establish Sounding
Datum and the accuracy of the tidal data in terms of both height and time. State the
assessment, from careful scrutiny of cross-line intersections, of the accuracy of the tidal
reductions after co-tidal corrections have been applied. (see paragraph 5).
10. Tidal Streams
10.1 State where, when and how, tidal stream observations were carried out. Mention any
problems with the equipment.
10.2 Explain why a required tidal stream station was not observed or was observed in a
different position from the one ordered.
10.3 If the observations were not taken at Springs, explain why not and estimate the
consequential effect on the quality of the data rendered. State what analysis has been
carried out.
10.4 Give a brief synopsis of the observations obtained and the Surveyor's opinion of the
accuracy of the observations and the effects of the weather on the quality of the data.
10.5 If no observations were carried out, give a brief qualitative assessment of the tidal
streams derived from experience of handling the ship on sounding lines, or from
fishermen or others with local knowledge.
11. Wrecks and Obstructions
11.1 State the method of investigating wrecks and obstructions, including the techniques used
for wire-sweeping and the number of wrecks/obstructions which were wire-swept.
11.2 Comment on any problems encountered with obtaining the least depths,
e.g. 'could not wire drift sweep because the wreck was at a nodal point'; or 'the
weather was too rough for wire sweeping but least depth obtained by echo
sounder was considered sufficient'.
11.3 Provide a general statement on details obtained from fishermen or others with local
knowledge. If possible, provide a summary of the effect that certain weather conditions
have on wrecks and obstructions.
11.4 Explain why a particular ordered wire-sweep was not carried out.
M-13
507
12. Lights and Buoys
12.1 Described how lights were checked and were fixed. If any new light has been
established, it should be fully described using the format in the Light List, and the
method of determining its position stated. (Details of the observations for position should
appear in the Geodetic Data).
12.2 Whenever possible, the Authority responsible for establishing any new light or buoy
should be quoted.
12.3 Describe how the position of each buoy was fixed on the flood and the ebb and quote the
spread of position about the final accepted mean.
12.4 Give the Surveyor's opinion on the accuracy of the observations to determine light sectors
and positions of navigational buoys. Give a positive statement to confirm the light
characteristics shown on all the published charts that cover the survey area (Art 0309).
13. Coastline, Topography, Measured Distances, Conspicuous Objects and Marks
13.1 State whether the coastline was fixed in the field and if so by what method, or whether
accepted from:
a. aerial photo plot - give details

b. maps - give details
13.2 State how heights were observed. Comment on any significant changes such as foreshore
erosion or significant soft sediment build up.
13.3 Comment on any new man-made facilities such as marinas or jetties (which are also to be
included in amendments to Sailing Directions).
13.4 Comment on any measured distances and marks indicating clearing lines, leading lines or
recommended tracks, either found, or charted but no longer usable. Include full details in
the amendments to the Sailing Directions and Annex M.
13.5 Remark on those objects considered to be conspicuous and objects charted as

conspicuous but no longer worthy of the description. Include these in amendments to
Sailing Directions and in Annex M.
13.6 Where an Aerial Photo Plot was provided, describe the way in which the data was
checked in the field and draw attention to any major discrepancies found. Comment on
the general utility of the plot.
14. Sailing Directions and Nomenclature
14.1 Comment that amendments were not needed, or that they are contained in Annex N.
Draw attention to any major inaccuracies in the current Sailing Directions. Remark on
photographs taken and the accuracy of those currently published in the Sailing
Directions. State whether or not charted names have been checked, in so far as this is
practicable, giving details of how this was done. When one set of amendments covers
two or more surveys, or a survey rendered in two or more parts with separate reports, a
M-13
508
reference is to be included in each report indicating where the Amendments to Sailing

Directions may be found.
14.2 Remark on any new names proposed.
14.3 List copies of port handbooks, guides etc obtained during the course of the survey and
forwarded with the Report of Survey.
15. Radio Signals
15.1 Provide a general statement on the accuracy of data contained in ALRS that applies to the
area surveyed and ports visited.
16. Ancillary Observations
16.1 Describe the observing techniques and venture opinions on the thoroughness of the
observations used for any of the following:
a. Fresh Water Springs;

b. Overfalls, Tide Rips and Eddies;
c. Any special scientific observations ordered (e.g. magnetic variation).
17. Miscellaneous
17.1 Comment on any other facets of the execution and results of the survey which may be of
value to the Hydrographic Office or of historic interest when reviewed in future years.
[Signature Block]
M-13
509
CONTENTS
PART 2 - TECHNICAL
A Accompanying Documents
B Digital Surveying System
C Geodetic Data
D Navaid Calibrations and Validations
E Sound Velocity and Bar-Check Observations
F Levelling and Tidal Observations
G Accuracy of Soundings
H Comparison with Published Chart
I Wrecks and Obstructions
J Tidal Stream Observations
K Light Sectors and Buoys
L Seabed Textures, Natures of the Bottom and Retained Seabed Samples
M Topographical Features, Conspicuous Objects and Marks
N Sailing Directions Amendments and Nomenclature
O Views
P Light List Amendments
Q Radio Signals Amendments
R Underwater Handbook Amendments
S Ancillary/Miscellaneous Observations
T Reports of Dangers and Hydrographic Notes
U Personnel
V Diary of Notable Events
W Summary of Surveying Activity
Additional annexes, e.g. copies of communication with the Hydrographic Office, may be added as
required.
M-13
510
M-13
511
ANNEX A TO
[Report of Survey Reference]
[Date]
Accompanying Documents
A.1 List all the documents and records accompanying the Report of Survey. For example:
a. Bathymetric Sheet;
b. Seabed Texture Tracing;
c. Sounding Track Plot
d. Sonar Track Plot;
e. Contour Tracing;
f. Miscellaneous Tracing(s) - Co-tidal Corrections, Floating Navigational Marks, Names,
etc;
g. Wreck Cards/Records;
h. SV Probe Data Tapes;
i. List of Digital Data Tapes
etc
A.2 Provide a statement on the neatness and accuracy of tracings if appropriate. If several staff have
been employed on a particular tracing, the division of labour is to be described.
M-13
512
ANNEX B TO
[Date]
Digital Surveying System
B.1 Include a brief description of:
a. System hardware;
b. Software version number;
c. Main software functions;
d. Applications of software;
e. Any major difficulties encountered.
B.2 Include:
a. Diary of all defects that had a significant impact on the conduct of the survey;
b. Details of the variables and parameters used during logging and processing;
c. A diagram illustrating all laybacks.
B.3 The total number of DATA files created is to be stated. if any file was not rendered, e.g. because
it was corrupted. a brief explanation is to be given.
B.4 Processing (Track)
a. A statement that no recalculation of position was undertaken or details of any lines where
recalculation of position was necessary;
b. Details of any major track editing - other than the removal of the occasional spurious
position.
B.5 Processing (Depth)
Details of processing parameters used during the survey. Variations from standard methods and
procedures set for the processing system in use to be explained.
B.6 Details of any digital terrain or elevation models produced:
a. Name
b. Origin
c. Azimuth
d. Height and width
e. Bandwidth and number of bands
f. Character size used
g. Confirmation that 'selected soundings only' have been used
h. Details of any polygon clipping used to plot to the bathymetric sheet.
M-13
513
B.7 Grid
a. Name
b. Origin
c. Height and width
d. Number of squares, square size and search distance
B.8 If any variations from standard procedure were adopted they are to be described in detail. in
particular, the following should be noted.
a. The manual adjustment of any selected depths. Any major manual reselection of the
soundings selected by the automatic sounding selection process.
b. The addition of any depths to the bathymetric sheet which are not included in the digital
record. A list of all individual depths or the co-ordinates of the limits of blocks of
manual data are to be provided.
c. The editing out of any invalid depths from the digital model
B.9 Print-outs of Job Configurations used during survey.
M-13
514
ANNEX C TO
[Date]
Geodetic Data
Section 1 - Description of Observations
C.1.1 This should be a comprehensive description of the methods and instruments used for observing
the control. The type of equipment and the mode in which it was used should be carefully
described. The name and versions of any computer programs used for the reduction of
observations, or any other type of processing or transformation should be detailed. Difficulties
encountered and how overcome, together with remarks on accuracy achieved should be included.
Section 2 - Horizontal Datum, Spheroid, Projection and Grid Details; List of Coordinates
C.2.1 Horizontal datum, projection and grid details will normally have been stated in the geodetic
appendix to the survey specification. These should be repeated at the beginning of this section,
examples being:
Àll control is referred to World Geodetic System 1984 Datum, World Geodetic System
1984 Spheroid; grid coordinates are given in terms of the Transverse Mercator
Projection, UTM Grid Zone 21 South (Central Meridian 057°W).'
or
Àll control is referred to ETRS89 Datum, GRS80 Spheroid; grid coordinates are given in
terms of the Transverse Mercator Projection, UTM Grid Zone 31 North (Central
Meridian 003°E).'
Exceptionally, where no suitable horizontal datum is already established, the details required are
to be stated in full.
C.2.2 Stations are to be listed, in tabular form as an Annex to the Report of Survey, see example at the
end of this outline Annex. For each station, the information required is:
a. Distinguishing letter;
b. Full name;
c. Field name and/or GPS SITE number;
d. Source for old stations. Estimated error for new or re-occupied stations. If the sources
for horizontal position and height are different, both should be quoted;
e. Geographical co-ordinates. Coordinates should not be quoted to a greater precision than

that justified by their estimated error. Coordinates accepted from other sources should be
in bold and underlined.
M-13
515
f. Grid coordinates. Coordinates should not be quoted to a greater precision than that
justified by their estimated error. Coordinates accepted from other sources should be in
bold and underlined.
g. Spheroidal height in metres;
h. Orthometric height in metres.
C.2.3 Stations determined independently of the main control network are to be clearly distinguished,
and their source stated. They should be listed separately in a table, a suggested format is at
Annex A of this section.
C.2.4 Any heights observed should be clearly tabulated and their source stated. The vertical datum used
should be stated together with details of the method used, whether the heights are orthometric or
spheroidal and the geoid/spheriod separation used, together with its source.
Section 3 - Descriptions of Stations
C.3.1 List any known geodetic stations which no longer exist and explain why.
C.3.2 Descriptions of stations should be rendered for all recoverable stations; amendments found to be
necessary to descriptions of previously established stations should also be rendered. If a
previously established station cannot be recovered, this is to be stated giving suggested reasons
for the problem. The descriptions of the station mark itself, its immediate locality and the general
area are to be as thorough and detailed as possible, to enable the station to be both identified on
aerial photography, and also recovered on the ground.
C.3.3 Aerial photographs of the general locality, on which stations have been very accurately pricked
through, should be supplied where possible. Ground, or preferably low aerial, photographs
should also be used to illustrate the stations themselves.
C.3.4 Pre-marked control points for air photography should be photographed at altitude intervals of
1000 feet up to 4000 feet. This may be achieved by either air survey cameras or a hand held
camera. At least two shots at each altitude from different positions as near vertical as possible
should be taken. At least one pair of photographs should include some coastline, if possible. All
control photography should be recorded with a Photographic Reconnaissance Report. Prints
made of control photography should be full frame, if possible.
C.3.5 All diagrams and photographs should be black and white, and be drawn or selected with a view to
their legibility when reproduced. Views should be annotated with: survey specification number;
station name and letter; date and reference to Report of Survey. If labels are used, it is
recommended that they be stuck on the reverse.
Section 4 - Abstract of observations
C.4.1 The following sub sections should be completed where appropriate.
a. Angles - This section is to contain a set of observation forms, one (or more) for each
station occupied. All observed horizontal angles are to be recorded, including any not
used in the field adjustment, to permit later, more rigorous, Hydrographic Office
adjustment. An estimate of the error in each final reduced grid circle reading should be
M-13
516
stated. Corrections for t-T should be shown for each ray, including that to the Reference
Object. Vertical angles should be shown separately.
b. Distances - This section should contain full details for the measurement of each line. All
observed distances should be recorded, including any not used in the field adjustment, to
permit later, more rigorous, Hydrographic Office adjustment. In all cases, the derivation
of the final reduced grid distance from the raw instrument readings must be clear and
unambiguous. Care must be taken that the scale factors are applied the correct way
round. An estimate of the error in the result should be included. Full details of the
methods used, and the corrections applied, should be given in the case of distances
measured by other means. Details of computer programs used to reduce the observations
to the grid should be included, together with copies of any printer output.
c. Geodetic GPS This section should contain at least the following data:
(1) List of baselines observed including: Date and Julian Day No, Session Letter,
Stations Observed.
(2) List of antenna heights for each observation (stating whether it is a slope, vertical
or offset height).
(3) Pintout of ALL post processed GPS vector files used to determine coordinates;
(4) Floppy disk containing raw observational data;
(5) Floppy disk containing all post processed GPS files and network adjustment files.
A backup copy of all data should be retained onboard until the survey has been
fully appraised by the Hydrographic Office.
Section 5 - Description of Adjustment
C.5.1 A comprehensive description of the methods used for adjusting the control is required. Items to
be rendered and their format will vary depending on national requirements.
C.5.2 For geodetic GPS schemes, only one known point need be held fixed in the adjustment process.
Where further points in the scheme are known points, a comparison should be made between the
computed coordinates as a result of the adjustment and the original known coordinates.
Section 6 – Transformation of Co-ordinates
C.6.1 Give full details of any transformations of co-ordinates that were undertaken. This should include
the actual transformation parameters used and the software platform on which the calculations
were performed.
Section 7 – Correspondence with other Surveying Authorities
C.7.1 Copies of all correspondence with local surveying authorities regarding geodetic control should
be included in the Report of Survey.
M-13
517
Diagram of Control
1. A Diagram of Control should be produced manually when the software used to adjust the network
does not have the facility to produce a network diagram. The Diagram of Control should be
drawn on good quality paper and bound with the Report of Survey. The size of the diagram
should be sufficient to allow all observations to be distinguished easily and with the station names
shown clearly. Its folded size should ideally not exceed A4; areas of dense control may be shown
as larger scale insets, or separately, to aid clarity. A scale and a graticule should be included. It
is recommended that stations accepted from previous work should be shown in red, and all others
in black.
2. The types of observations are to be clearly distinguishable. For example, observed angles may be
indicated by small arcs joining the defining rays; observed distances may be indicated by doubled
rays; GPS vectors may be indicated by red lines.
M-13
518
LIST OF CO-ORDINATES AND HEIGHTS
Source for old WGS 84 Datum, UTM grid zone 21 South, Central Meridian 57º West
SITE stations.
Spheroid Orthomet
(Letter)/Full Name/[Field Estimated error Latitude Longitude Eastings Northings
al Height ric Height
Name] [GPS Number] for new or re- (South) (West) (metres E) (metres N)
(metres) (metres)
occupied stations
(A) Mount Round [ROUND] Fl 360 E FL/5- 51º 36’ 57º 58’
432012.40 4282726.15 168.80 155.48
[2502] P22 08”.6352 54”.0517
(B) Mount Brisbane Fl 360 E FL/1- 51º 29’ 57º 55’
435231.84 4295332.16 187.50 173.88
[BRISBANE] [2501] P26 22”.000 58”.372
51º 33’ 58º 25’
(C) Port Long [LONG] [ 2503] < + 0.1 (1σ) metre 425025.37 4299045.83 22.45 20.43
24”.124 34”.678
51º 36’ 58º 57’
(D) Icy Point [ICY] [2504 < + 0.1 (1σ) metre 425609.24 4300005.67 38.91 18.22
36.016 54”.879
_________
M-13
519
ANNEX D TO
[Date]
Navaid Calibrations and Validations
D.1 State types of navaid, frequencies and operating modes.
D.2 If using differential GPS, state which reference stations were used and give details.
D.3 Describe the calibration and validation methods used.
D.4 List all the navaid calibration / validation results including any computer printouts (if available)
for all calibrations / validations carried out before, during and after the survey.
D.5 Where a precise navaid such as Trisponder is used to validate a DGPS navaid, full details of the
calibration of the reference navaid should be included as well as details of the validation. Where a
second DGPS navaid is used to validate the primary DGPS navaid it should be as fully
independent a system as possible. The preferred method is to use post processed or real-time
kinematic GPS for validations of DGPS navaids.
D.6 When using a data logging and processing system, a printout showing the navaid and system
configuration should be included as an Appendix. Whenever there are changes to this, they
should be recorded and a new printout obtained for record purposes. Where appropriate a
statistical summary should be derived from the End-of-Line navaid LOP statistics, and included.
M-13
520
ANNEX E TO
[Date]
Sound Velocity and Bar-Check Observations
E.1 List the dates and results obtained for each observation.
E.2 When mean sound velocities have been calculated from expendable bathythermograph (XBT)
observations, the consecutive numbers of the XBT observations and the assumed salinity values
used must be included.
E.3 Record of CTDV Probe Casts
E.4 Record of Oceanographic stations Observations
E.5 Record of Sound Velocity Probe Observations.
(NB A copy of the appropriate forms should also accompany the magnetic data tapes which should be
rendered to the Hydrographic Office with the Report of Survey).
M-13
521
ANNEX F TO
[Date]
Levelling and Tidal Observations
F.1 Quote the levelling results in the form of a diagram, and state clearly the value of Sounding
Datum established.
F.2 Include the Record of Tidal Observations and the Record of Transfer of Sounding Datum - where
appropriate.
F.3 Record of Daily Tidegauge Checks.
F.4 Results of 25 hour tidepole – tidegauge comparison.
F.5 When using an offshore seabed tidegauge data should be rendered according to national rules.
For the Report of Survey should only be necessary to render a summary of observations in the
following format:
Tidegauge Position Recording Date Rendered UKHO Reduction

Address Period Figure
M-13
522
ANNEX G TO
[Date]
Accuracy of Soundings
G.1 State depth variation throughout the survey area and indicate the acceptable standard error which
accrues.
G.2 List techniques adopted and the assessment of the standard errors achieved under each of the
headings listed in the table below.
G.3 Set out, as in the table below, a listing of the standard error assessments for each of the tested
criteria at the shoalest and deepest depths encountered and any intermediate depths where the
error assessments change markedly. A brief explanation should be given for the assessment of
each standard error.
Source At Deepest At Intermediate At Shoalest

Depth Depth(S) Depth
Echo Sounder TX Mark Setting
Variation in TX mark setting
SV Measurement
Spatial Variation in SV
Temporal Variation in SV
Application of Measured SV
Instrumental Accuracy
Trace Resolution
Heave
Settlement and Squat
Roll, Pitch and Seabed Slope
Tidal Measurement
Co-tidal Corrections
Application of Tidal Reduction
Trace Reading
Combined Error = √∑(x)2
Requirement = √+(0.5)2 + (0.009d) 2
Standard Met (Yes/No)
M-13
523
ANNEX H TO
[Date]
Comparison with Published Chart
H.1 Draw attention to depth changes which may warrant promulgation by Notices to Mariners. For
example:
a. In depths 0 to 10 m list depths shoaler than charted by at least 0.5m

b. In depths 10 to 31m list depths shoaler than charted by at least 1m
c. In depths 31 to 200m list depths shoaler than charted by 5% or more
d. In depths 200 to 800m list depths shoaler than charted by 10% or more
H.2 In high-risk areas where vessels operate regularly with minimum under-keel clearance, any
shoaling of critical or controlling depths should be listed. Examples of such high-risk areas are:
the Dover Strait TSS; Southern North Sea Deep Water Routes; within and adjacent to main
channels in port areas and their approaches.
H.3 In the following areas, no more than a general description of the changes is required. However,
the controlling depths must be clearly identified.
a. Areas of unstable seabed, where significant movement of features has occurred;

b. Complex areas, such as rocky seabeds;
c. Areas where new surveyed depths are shoaler than charted over a significant part of the
survey area (even if the differences fall within the criteria in H.1. above).
H.4 It is important to give a firm recommendation on the charting action to be taken for charted
dangers which have not been found during the survey. A danger will not be removed from the
chart unless the recommendation is based on a full examination.
H.5 The horizontal reference datums of the positions of surveyed and charted features should be
stated. Ideally these should correspond to the datums of the survey and chart, respectively.
H.6 Any 3D views created using the data processing systems should be included in this annex. It is
recommended that each view be printed on A3 paper folded to fit within the Report of Survey
with a title block showing:
a. The title of the respective bathymetric sheet;

b. Horizontal and vertical scales;
c. Viewing azimuth and altitude
M-13
524
ANNEX I TO
[Date]
Wrecks and Obstructions
I.1 List all wrecks located and examined under two separate headings:
a. 'Known Wrecks' (by name, where appropriate and position)

b. 'New Wrecks' (by position) and cross reference to rendered wreck data.
I.2 Comment on all wrecks listed in the survey specification that were not located during the survey,
and offer opinions as to why they were not found.
I.3 Charted wrecks, obstructions or other dangerous features, which have not been located and
examined during a survey must be disproved if at all possible. They are unlikely be removed
from the chart without a positive statement from the Surveyor that this is justified.
I.4 Whatever the outcome of the search, whether as part of a larger survey or as an individual
examinations, the Surveyor must report the findings in full, in an appropriate manner, and with
supporting traces as necessary, together with a positive recommendation as to future charting
action.
I.5 For any 'not fully surveyed' (NFS) wrecks, a brief statement of the additional work required, e.g.
'to be wire swept'.
I.6 List all seabed obstructions (including wellheads) located, as well as those which were not found
(and why).
I.7 List all fisherman's fasteners, stating whether any have been searched for and found, and whether
correlation is possible with other features. Any information obtained in confidence is to be
identified.
M-13
525
ANNEX J TO
[Date]
Tidal Stream Observations
J.1 Include Record of Tidal Stream/Current Observations.
M-13
526
ANNEX K TO
[Date]
Light Sectors and Buoys
K.1 Give details of how all light sectors were observed, and list the final accepted sectors. Check
these against Annex P (Amendments to Light List).
K.2 List all buoys by name, number (where appropriate), characteristics and position (mean of flood
and ebb fixes).
M-13
527
ANNEX L TO
[Date]
Seabed Textures, Natures of the Bottom and Retained Seabed Samples
L.1 Give a general description of the nature and texture of the seabed, draw attention to any special
features found and state the extent and direction of any areas of sand ripples.
L.2 List position, height, extent and assessment of any contacts with a dimension of > 1 m.
L.3 Provide a Record of Seabed Samples and Cores.
M-13
528
ANNEX M TO
[Date]
Topographical Features, Conspicuous Objects and Marks
M.1 List all topographical features currently charted or mentioned in the Sailing Directions as
conspicuous or prominent by name, position and relevant paragraph in Sailing Directions with
comment on whether conspicuous or prominent.
M.2 Provide a separate list of features considered conspicuous or prominent but not formerly charted
as such.
M.3 The lists should include photographs and not be confined to features within, or visible from the
survey area but should include features nearby that have been assessed when on passage to and
from the replenishment port.
M.4 Provide full details of measured distances either found, or charted but no longer usable.
M.5 Provide full details of all marks used to indicate clearing lines, leading lines and recommended
tracks either found, or charted but no longer usable.
M-13
529
ANNEX N TO
[Date]
Sailing Directions Amendments and Nomenclature
N.1 During the course of any survey, the relevant Sailing Directions should be carefully examined
and suitable amendments formulated. Notes for these amendments must be kept throughout the
survey, as the need for them is realised, and the revised text should be compiled immediately after
the completion of work in the field, when every essential point is still fresh in the mind. It is not
possible to write Sailing Directions solely from study of the bathymetric sheet.
N.2 The annex should clearly indicate which paragraphs of Sailing Directions have been verified.
N.3 Sailing Directions are written by the surveyor as information supplementary to the bathymetric
sheet, but should be applicable, if possible, to the existing published chart as well. It should be
borne in mind that the editors of Sailing Directions do not normally see the bathymetric sheet and
will use the published chart when examining the surveyor's proposed text. Consequently
reference objects should, whenever possible, be common both to chart and bathymetric sheet.
N.4 As a general rule, the Sailing Directions applicable to a survey will be covered by only a few
pages in the published book, but care must be taken to check the general information in the
appropriate volume as well as that in any of the appendices which may be relevant to the area
being surveyed or to adjacent localities.
N.5 In each case, the position of the amendment should be clearly identified. When writing large
amendments, it is recommended that these should be compiled in the style of the book being
amended. The surveyor should always be prepared to be more expansive in his text than is likely
to be necessary for the published book. The editor will then be able to get a fuller picture of the
area and will be able to condense, or précis, the proposed amendments with more authority. It is
particularly important that if any detail is to be deleted from a large section being rewritten, a
positive statement to the effect, with background detail if appropriate, should be included.
Merely omitting a point leaves the editor in doubt as to whether the omission is deliberate or an
oversight.
N.6 Whenever possible, any structure specifically mentioned in Sailing Directions should be
illustrated by colour photographs, and general views (colour photography or manuscript)
provided wherever these would be useful. These are especially valuable in the approaches to
ports, and along recommended leading lines.
N.7 In particular the following features should be described or reported:
Anchorages If extensive or complicated, they should be included on a tracing

accompanying the bathymetric sheet.
Berths To be fully described
Breakers Details of areas of breakers and inhospitable coasts are to be given.
M-13
530
Bridges To be fully described. Where a bridge moves to allow shipping to pass

the width of the channel formed is to be reported.
Clearing Lines To be fully described, mentioning (if a transit) the rear mark first and
then the front mark.
Cliffs Where their colour is significantly different from the surroundings, and
this fact would be useful to the mariner, it is to be reported.
Danger Areas If extensive or complicated, they should be included on a tracing

accompanying the bathymetric sheet.
Dolphins To be fully described
Eddies Comment as to whether the feature is dangerous or not.
Ferries To be fully described
Floating Bridges To be fully described
Fresh water Springs To be fully described
Groynes To be fully described
Harbour Facilities To be fully described. To avoid unnecessarily long descriptions of large

ports it will often suffice if copies of the port brochures and regulations
are obtained and forwarded with the Amendments to the Sailing
Directions.
Jetties To be fully described
Kelp Areas of kelp, its existence and extent of its effect are to be fully
described
Leading Lines To be fully described, mentioning (if a transit) the rear mark first and
Light Sectors If sectors are different from those already charted, details are to be
given.
Locks To be fully described. The maximum depth over the sill is to be reported
Measured Distances To be fully described.

Offshore Installations To be fully described
Outfalls To be fully described
Overfalls Comment as to whether the feature is dangerous or not.
M-13
531
Overhead Lines Where they pass over a navigable channel, the safe clearance above
MHWS (or MHHW) is to be reported together with the names of the
authority responsible and their contact officer. Some overhead lines are
conspicuous to radar and may appear as a contact on a steady bearing.
When this is the case, the effect should be described.
Port Facilities To be fully described. To avoid unnecessarily long descriptions of large

ports it will often suffice if copies of the port brochures and regulations
are obtained and forwarded with the Amendments to the Sailing
Directions.
Recommended Tracks To be fully described, mentioning (if a transit) the rear mark first and
River bar If the bar is liable to change, the fact is to be stated.
Sandwaves Limits, orientation, distance between crests, and maximum height from
trough to crest are to be given.
Sewers To be fully described
Slipways To be fully described
Spoil Grounds To be fully described.
Tide-rips Comment as to whether the feature is dangerous or not.
Well-heads To be fully described
Wharves To be fully described
N.8 Give the Surveyor's recommendations for pilotage through the survey area (if appropriate).
N.9 All charted names should be checked. If a name different from that charted is found to be in
general use locally the authoritative source of the information is to be reported. List separately
any new names proposed, with full explanation of the reasoning behind the need to name the
feature (except in unexplored areas when this is self-evident) and the selection of the proposed
names.
N.10 Any local mapping obtained should be forwarded with the Report of Survey and identified in this
annex.
M-13
532
ANNEX O TO
[Date]
Views
O.1 There is a continuing need for photographs to illustrate Sailing Directions. In general
photographs over 10 years old are not reliable, therefore every opportunity should be taken to re-
photograph existing views, and provide new views.
O.2 The compiler of a chart and the editor of Sailing Directions can be greatly helped if they can
visualise the area with which they are dealing. One of the best ways of providing this visual input
is by the use of photographic views. Good quality colour photographs, particularly aerial
obliques, are preferred.
O.3 The surveyor should take steps to illustrate the Report of Survey and the Amendments to the
Sailing Directions as fully as possible. Even if only a few of the pictures forwarded are
eventually published, they will all have been examined in the Hydrographic Office and will have
allowed those processing the survey to see the area, in part at least, as the mariner sees it.
M-13
533
ANNEX P TO
[Date]
Light List Amendments
P.1 List all discrepancies found between the detail shown in the relevant Light List and published
charts and those observed.
M-13
534
ANNEX Q TO
[Date]
Radio Signals Amendments
Q.1 List amendments for the appropriate list of Radio Signals covering the survey area and ports
visited. Describe details of vessel traffic services, ship reporting systems, maritime safety
information broadcasts, radio pilot services, port operations, radio navigational aids, radio and
radar beacons, coast radio station services and search and rescue procedures.
M-13
535
ANNEX R TO
[Date]
Ancillary/Miscellaneous Observations
R.1 Provide details in the form required by the survey specification or, if not mentioned therein, in as
clear and concise a format as possible (preferably tabular). Include in this Annex; corrections to
the Air Photographic Plot, Spoil Grounds and Dredged Areas, Freshwater Springs, and details of
any Oceanographic or Geophysical Observations undertaken.
M-13
536
ANNEX S TO
[Date]
Reports of Dangers and Hydrographic Notes
S.1 List all signalled, faxed or e-mail reports and refer to Forms H102 and H102A submitted in
respect of the area surveyed.
M-13
537
ANNEX T TO
[Date]
Personnel
T.1 Provide a nominal list, with relevant dates, of all involved with the survey.
M-13
538
ANNEX U TO
[Date]
Diary of Notable Events
U.1 List all significant events (with their dates) which have influenced the conduct of the survey.
These may include:
a. Establishing control;
b. Survey navaid calibrations;
c. Start of fieldwork;
d. Port calls and leave periods;
e. Sea Training, Naval Exercises or other military activities;
f. Serious breakdowns (ship or equipment);
g. Completion of fieldwork;
h. Post-survey navaid calibrations.
M-13
539
ANNEX V TO
[Date]
Summary of Surveying Activity
V.1 It is often useful to provide a table giving the breakdown of the days covering the period of the
survey (between the dates quoted on the front cover of the Report of Survey). 'Downtime' is
calculated in days derived from aggregated hourly periods. Harbour days should be entered in the
column that represents the primary activity for each day. The sum of the individual columns
should equal the total shown in the first column. Column headings are as follows:
Harbour
TOTAL SEA
Days Lost
Weather, Passage Military Maintenance Visits
Calendar Ship and Duties and including
Surveying Leave
Days Equipment Emergency logistic
Downtime Repair stops
__________
M-13
540
M-13

Manual On Hydrography - IHO PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Manual On Hydrography - IHO PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Manual On Hydrography - IHO PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC ORGANIZATION

INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC BUREAU

• The co-ordination of the activities of national hydrographic offices;

The content of this Manual is divided into seven chapters:

• Chapter 1 refers to the principles of hydrographic surveying, including its specifications;

Capt Muhammad ZAFARYAB (Pakistan), Cdr Lamberto LAMBERTI (Italy), Lt Antonio DI

CHAPTER 1 “PRINCIPLES OF HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYING”...........................................7

Annex A – Acronyums ....................................................................................................................29

CHAPTER 2 “POSITIONING” .......................................................................................................33

6.2.3 Circular lines of position (CLOPs)...........................................................100

CHAPTER 3 “DEPTH DETERMINATION” ...............................................................................119

4.1.2 Piezoelectric .............................................................................................135

Annex A Reference and Corodinate Systems.......................................................................195

CHAPTER 4 “SEAFLOOR CLASSIFICATION AND FEATURE DETECTION” .................199

2.3.2 Sidescan Sonar (SSS) ...............................................................................203

CHAPTER 5 “WATER LEVELS AND FLOW” .........................................................................253

2.1.1 Astronomical Tide Producing Forces .......................................................253

CHAPTER 6 “TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING” ..........................................................................301

3.2.3 Image Structure and Support ....................................................................358

Annex A Algorithms for the Transverse Mercator Representation .........................................391

CHAPTER 7 “HYDROGRAPHIC PRACTICE” .........................................................................409

4.5 Check Lines ..............................................................................................................461

Appendix 1 – Survey Planning and Estimation Guide................................................................483

BRIEF HISTORY OF HYDROGRAPHY

To adequately address areas such as:

• Safe and efficient operation of maritime traffic control;

FIELDS OF COMPETENCE ASSOCIATED WITH HYDROGRAPHY

Coastal Zone Management

Exploration and exploitation of marine resources

Fishery activities need detailed charts in order to:

Environment Protection and Management

National Spatial Data Infrastructure

Maritime Boundary Delimitation

♦ Maritime navigation and traffic management.

Hydrographic surveying is undergoing fundamental changes in measurement technology. Multibeam

2.1 Survey Specifications

Horizontal 2m 5 m + 5% of depth 20 m + 5% of depth 150 m + 5% of depth

The rows of Table 1 are explained as follows:

- Row 1 "Examples of Typical Areas" gives examples of areas to which an order of

- Row 2 "Horizontal Accuracy" lists positioning accuracies to be achieved to meet each

- Row 5 "System Detection Capability" specifies the detection capabilities of systems

2.2 Survey Planning

• Exact area of the survey.

In addition, appendices to HIs will give instruction or guidance on the following:

• Horizontal datum, projection and grid to be used.

• Tidal datum and observations required.

2.3 Data Gathering

2.4 Data Processing

Data + Process = Job

Job Progress Log

Fig. 1.1 "Data Processing model"

ERROR SIZE ELIMINATION

2.6 Data Quality

2.7 Data Quality - Presentation

2.7.1 Chart Reliability Diagrams

2.7.2 Zones of Confidence (ZOC)

* Depth and position accuracy,

2.7.2.6 ZOC U – The quality of bathymetric data has yet to be assessed.

Category of Zones of Confidence in Data – ZOC Table