June 2014 Mark Scheme 31
June 2014 Mark Scheme 31
June 2014 Mark Scheme 31
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of
the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not
indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began,
which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner
Report for Teachers.
Cambridge will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2014 series for most IGCSE, GCE
Advanced Level and Advanced Subsidiary Level components and some Ordinary Level components.
Page 2 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper
IGCSE – May/June 2014 0500 31
Note: All Examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected
approaches in candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant
knowledge and skills demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and
derived from the passage.
Question 1
Read carefully the transcript of a radio broadcast about people’s attitudes to animals.
Then answer Section 1, Question 1 on this Question Paper.
Base your speech on what you have read in the transcript. Be careful to use your own
words.
Begin your speech: ‘The recent broadcast about people’s attitudes to animals raised
important issues…’.
You should write about 1½ to 2 sides allowing for the size of your handwriting.
Up to 10 marks are available for the content of your answer, and up to 15 marks for the
quality of your writing.
[25]
The best responses take a sensible and logical view of the broadcaster’s arguments, extending their
own arguments at some length, using detail from the text, but not trying to respond to all the material.
They differentiate between the conservationists and the sentimentalists. They may see that at least
some of the views are worth consideration.
Average responses are sometimes well ordered summaries of the article. Less strong responses may
be brief evaluations.
Weaker responses tend to summarise some of the content in no particular order, lift parts of the
reading material or write irrelevantly, drifting away from the passage.
Responses may include a wide range of points of which the following are examples:
A1 – The broadcaster’s views with which candidates may agree (with explanations) (explicit)
Accept other relevant ideas derived from the passage and relevant to the question.
Band 2 7–8 Some evidence of evaluation, engaging with a few of the main points with
success. Uses reading material to support the argument. Occasionally
effective development of ideas in the material.
Band 4 3–4 Selects points from the passage rather literally and/or uses the material
thinly. Does not combine points into a connected response.
Band 5 1–2 Parts of the response are relevant, though the material may be repeated or
used inappropriately.
Band 6 0 Response does not relate to question and/or too much unselective copying
directly from the material to gain a mark in Band 5.
First variant Mark Scheme
Band 1 13–15 Consistent sense of audience; authoritative and appropriate style. Fluent,
varied sentences; wide range of vocabulary. Strong sense of structure,
paragraphing and sequence. Virtually no error.
Band 2 10–12 Sense of audience mostly secure; there is evidence of style and fluency;
sentences and vocabulary are effective. Secure overall structure; mostly well-
sequenced. Writing is mainly accurate.
Band 4 5–7 Inconsistent style; simple or faultily constructed sentences; vocabulary simple;
basic structure. Frequent errors, including sentence separation.
Band 5 3–4 Inappropriate expression; the response is not always well sequenced.
Serious errors in sentence structure/vocabulary/grammar/punctuation.
Band 6 1–2 Expression unclear; flawed sentence construction and order. Persistent
serious errors interfere with the conveying of meaning.
Band 7 0 Problems of expression and accuracy are too serious to gain a mark in
Band 6.
First variant Mark Scheme
Section 2: Composition
Write about 2 sides, allowing for the size of your handwriting, on one of the following:
Argumentative/Discursive Writing
2 (a) Discuss the role of music or dance in young people’s lives. [25]
OR
Descriptive Writing
3 (a) Describe a small group of people relaxing, and then the moment that destroys the
atmosphere of calm. [25]
OR
(b) Describe a party in full swing, and then what the place is like when all the visitors have gone
home. [25]
Narrative Writing
4 (a) Write a story called ‘The Path that led to Nowhere’. [25]
OR
(b) Write a story that involves your attempt to cook a meal for others. [25]
Band 1 • Consistently well • There are many well- • The narrative is complex
11–13 developed, logical defined, well-developed and sophisticated and
stages in an overall, at ideas and images, may contain devices
times complex, describing complex such as sub-texts,
argument. atmospheres with a flashbacks and time
range of details. lapses. Cogent details
• Each stage is linked to are provided where
the preceding one, and • Overall structure is necessary or appropriate.
sentences within provided through
paragraphs are soundly devices such as the • Different parts of the
sequenced. movements of the story are balanced and
persona, the creation of the climax carefully
a short time span, or managed. Sentence
the creation of sequences are
atmosphere or tension. sometimes arranged to
There is no confusion produce effects such as
with writing a story. the building up of
Repetition is avoided tension or providing a
and the sequence of sudden turn of events.
sentences makes the
picture clear to the
reader.
Band 2 • Each stage of the • There is a good range • The writing develops
9–10 argument is defined of images with some interesting
and developed, interesting details features, but not
although the which contribute to a consistently so. Expect
explanation may not be sense of atmosphere. the use of detail and
consistent. some attention to
• These are formed into character or setting.
• The stages follow in a an overall picture of
generally cohesive some clarity, largely • Writing is orderly and the
progression. consistent and beginning and ending are
Paragraphs are mostly effective. There may be satisfactorily managed.
well sequenced, occasional repetition, The reader is well
although some may and opportunities for aware of the climax
finish less strongly than development or the even if it is not fully
they begin. provision of detail may effective. Sequencing of
be missed. Sentences sentences provides
are often well clarity and engages the
sequenced. reader in events or
atmosphere.
Band 5 • A few relevant points • Content is relevant but • A very simple narrative;
3–4 are made and may be lacking in scope or it may consist of
expanded into variety. Opportunities nonsensical or confusing
paragraphs, but to provide development events.
development is very and detail are
simple and not always frequently missed. • Unequal or
logical. inappropriate
• The overall structure, importance is given to
• There is weakness of though readily parts of the story.
sequencing overall and discernible, lacks form Paragraphing is
within paragraphs. and dimension. inconsistent. Dialogue
Paragraphing is Paragraphing is may be used
inconsistent. Repetition inconsistent. The ineffectively. There is no
and an inability to reliance on identifying real climax. Sentence
sustain relevant events, objects and/or sequences are used only
argument are obvious. people sometimes to link simple series of
leads to a sequence of events.
sentences without
progression.
Band 6 • A few points are • Some relevant facts are • Stories are incoherent
1–2 discernible but any identified, but the and narrate events
attempt to develop them overall picture is indiscriminately.
is very limited. unclear and lacks Endings are absent or
development. lack effect.
• Overall argument only
progresses here and • There are examples of • The shape of the
there and the sequence sequenced sentences, narrative is unclear;
of sentences is poor. but there is also some of the content has
repetition and muddled no relevance to the plot.
ordering. Sequences of sentences
are sometimes poor,
leading to a lack of
clarity.
Band 7 • Rarely relevant, little • Rarely relevant, little • Rarely relevant, little
0 material, and presented material, and presented material, and presented
in a disorderly structure. in a disorderly in a disorderly structure.
Not sufficient to be structure. Not sufficient Not sufficient to be
placed in Band 6. to be placed in Band 6. placed in Band 6.
Band 2 9–10 Writing is mostly fluent, sometimes linguistically effective and largely
accurate; may have some sense of audience.
Look for:
• signs of a developing style
• some ability to express shades of meaning
Band 3 7–8 Writing is clear, competent (if plain) in vocabulary and grammar; errors
perhaps frequent, but minor.
Look for:
• mostly correct sentence separation
• occasional precision and/or interest in choice of words
Band 4 5–6 Writing is clear and accurate in places, and uses limited vocabulary and
grammar; errors occasionally serious.
Look for:
• simple sentences
• errors of sentence separation
Band 5 3–4 Writing is simple in vocabulary and grammar; errors are distracting and
sometimes serious, but overall meaning can be followed.
Look for:
• definite weaknesses in sentence structures
• grammatical errors such as incorrect use of prepositions and tense
Band 6 1–2 Writing is weak in vocabulary and grammar; serious, persistent errors;
meaning is blurred.
Look for:
• faulty and/or rambling sentences
• language insufficient to carry intended meaning