0500 First Language English: MARK SCHEME For The October/November 2012 Series
0500 First Language English: MARK SCHEME For The October/November 2012 Series
0500 First Language English: MARK SCHEME For The October/November 2012 Series
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of
the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not
indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began,
which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner
Report for Teachers.
Cambridge will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2012 series for most IGCSE,
GCE Advanced Level and Advanced Subsidiary Level components and some Ordinary Level
components.
Page 2 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper
IGCSE – October/November 2012 0500 22
Note: All Examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the passage.
Question 1
Julia, during her recovery, fully explained her experience to her parents.
A reporter for a newspaper interviews Julia’s parents and asks the following three questions
only:
What made you choose to visit the rainforest in Ecuador with your daughter, Julia?
How did Julia’s accident happen, and what did she do to survive?
What are your thoughts and feelings towards the Achuar people and their way of life?
Write the words of the interview, beginning with the first question.
Base your interview on what you have read in Passage A. Be careful to use your own words.
Write between 1½ and 2 sides, allowing for the size of your handwriting.
Up to 15 marks are available for the content of your answer, and up to 5 marks for the quality
of your writing. [20]
Candidates should select ideas from the passage and develop their own, supporting what they write
with details from the passage and judging the appropriate register for the genre and context. Bear in
mind the difference between copying facts and giving opinions. Look for a clear response, well
structured and in the candidate’s own words. Reward responses which show understanding of the
family’s motives for going to the rainforest, and what they gained from the experience.
A1: What made you choose to visit the rainforest in Ecuador with your daughter, Julia?
• A remote/inaccessible/isolated place
• unique/unspoilt/extraordinary/magnificent scenery/other rainforests being destroyed
• amazing biodiversity/abundance of wildlife
• opportunity to develop biological knowledge
• to see and experience an ancient traditional culture/meet the Achuar people/one of the last
indigenous groups to remain isolated
• learn from Achuar people’s knowledge of the rainforest and medicinal use of plants
A2: How did Julia’s accident happen, and what did she do to survive?
A3: What are your thoughts and feelings towards the Achuar people and their way of life?
Band 1: The response reveals a thorough reading of the passage. A wide range of ideas is
13–15 applied, showing full understanding of the family’s experiences, and the parents’
points of view after the events. There is sustained use of supporting detail, which is
well integrated into the response, contributing to a strong sense of purpose and
approach. Developed ideas are well related to the passage. All three bullets are well
covered. Consistent and recognisable voices for the parents are created.
Band 2: There is evidence of a competent reading of the passage. Some ideas are
10–12 developed, but the ability to sustain content may not be consistent. There is
frequent supporting detail. The response answers all three bullets, though perhaps
not equally well. An appropriate voice is used.
Band 3: The passage has been read reasonably well, but the response may not reflect the
7–9 range or complexity of ideas in the original. There may be some mechanical use of
the passage. Supporting detail is used occasionally. Opportunities for development
are rarely taken and ideas are simply expressed. There is uneven focus on the
bullets. The voice is plain or lacks enthusiasm.
Band 4: Some brief, straightforward reference to the passage is made. There is some
evidence of general understanding of the main ideas, although the response may
4–6
be thin or in places lack focus on the passage or the question. One of the bullets
may not be addressed. The voice is not sustained or appropriate.
Band 5: The response is either very general, with little reference to the passage, or a
reproduction of sections of the original. Content is insubstantial, or there is little
1–3
realisation of the need to modify material from the passage.
Band 1: The language of the response has character and sounds convincing and
consistently appropriate. Ideas are firmly expressed in a wide range of effective
5
and/or interesting language. Structure and sequence are sound throughout.
Band 2: Language is mostly fluent and there is clarity of expression. There is a sufficient
range of vocabulary to express ideas with subtlety and precision, and to give an
4
indication of the personality of the character. The response is mainly well structured
and well sequenced.
Band 3: Language is clear and appropriate, but comparatively plain and/or factual,
expressing little opinion. Ideas are rarely extended, but explanations are adequate.
3
Some sections are quite well sequenced but there may be flaws in structure.
Band 4: There may be some awkwardness of expression and some inconsistency of style.
Language is too limited to express shades of meaning. There is structural weakness
2
and there may be some copying from the passage.
Band 5: There are problems of expression and structure. Language is weak and
undeveloped. There is little attempt to explain ideas. There may be frequent copying
1
from the original.
Band 6: Sentence structures and language are unclear and the response is difficult to follow.
0
Question 2
(a) the rainforest and its wildlife in paragraph 1, from ‘The family was trudging...’
(b) Julia’s walk through the rainforest in search of her parents in paragraph 4, from ‘Hours
later...’.
Select words and phrases from these descriptions, and explain how the writer has created
effects by using this language.
Write between 1 and 1½ sides, allowing for the size of your handwriting. [10]
This question is marked for the ability to select evocative or unusual words and for an understanding
of ways in which the language is effective. Expect responses to provide words that carry specific
meaning, including implications, additional to general or ordinary vocabulary.
Mark for the overall quality of the response, not for the number of words or phrases chosen, bearing
in mind that a range of choices is required to demonstrate an understanding of how language works,
and that these should include images. Do not take marks off for inaccurate statements; simply ignore
them. It is the quality of the analysis that attracts marks.
The following notes are a guide to what good responses might say about the selections. They can
make any sensible comment, but only credit those that are relevant to the correct meanings of the
words in the context and that have some validity. Alternative acceptable explanations should be
credited.
(a) the rainforest and its wildlife in paragraph 1, from ‘The family was trudging...’
Credit responses which show the rainforest is inhospitable but also thrilling and beautiful.
(b) Julia’s walk through the rainforest in search of her parents in paragraph 4, from
‘Hours later...’
Credit responses which show how Julia's experience proves that the rainforest is difficult,
frightening and painful.
READING
Band 1: Wide ranging discussion of language with some high quality comments that add
meaning and associations to words in both parts of the question, and demonstrate
9–10
the writer's reasons for using them. May give an overview of the paragraph’s
combined effect, or comment on language features additional to vocabulary.
Tackles imagery with some precision and imagination. There is clear evidence that
the candidate understands how language works.
Band 2: Reference is made to a number of words and phrases, and explanations are given
7–8 and effects identified in both parts of the question. Images are recognised as such
and the response goes some way to explaining them. There is some evidence that
the candidate understands how language works.
Band 3: A satisfactory attempt is made to identify appropriate words and phrases. The
5–6 response mostly gives meanings of words and any attempt to suggest and explain
effects is basic or very general. One half of the question may be better answered
than the other.
Band 4: The response provides a mixture of appropriate choices and words that
3–4 communicate less well. The response may correctly identify linguistic devices but
not explain why they are used. Explanations may be few, general, slight or only
partially effective. They may repeat the language of the original or do not refer to
specific words.
Band 5: The choice of words is sparse or rarely relevant. Any comments are inappropriate
and the response is very thin.
1–2
Band 6: The response does not relate to the question. Inappropriate words and phrases are
chosen or none are selected.
0
Question 3
Summarise:
(b) The challenges and potential problems faced by visitors to the rainforest, as described in
Passage A.
Use your own words as far as possible. Aim to write no more than one side in total, allowing for
the size of your handwriting. Up to 15 marks are available for the content of your answer, and
up to 5 marks for the quality of your writing. [20]
A CONTENT
(b) The challenges and potential problems faced by visitors to the rainforest (Passage A)
Examiners should decide whether understanding of a point has been expressed sufficiently clearly for
it to be rewarded. Be aware that there will be a great variety of expression, and be prepared to give
the benefit of the doubt in borderline cases.
Note: The basic points are those in bold – the rest of each answer is to contextualise and to help you
judge whether the point has been understood.
Band 1: Both parts of the summary are well focused on the passage and the question. All
5 points are expressed clearly, concisely and fluently, and in own words (where
appropriate) throughout.
Band 2: Most points are made clearly and concisely. Own words (where appropriate) are
4 used consistently. The summary is mostly focused but may have an inappropriate
introduction or conclusion.
Band 3: There are some areas of concision. There may be occasional loss of focus or clarity.
3 Own words (where appropriate) are used for most of the summary. Responses may
be list-like or not well sequenced.
Band 4: The summary is sometimes focused, but it may include comment, repetition,
2 unnecessarily long explanation or lifted phrases. It may exceed the permitted length.
Band 5: The summary is unfocused, wordy or overlong. It may be answered in the wrong
1 form (e.g. narrative, commentary, or as notes). There may be frequent lifting of
phrases and sentences.
It is important that candidates follow the instruction about writing a side in total for the summary, allowing
for the size of the handwriting. The guidelines are as follows: large handwriting is approximately five
words per line, average handwriting is eight / nine words per line, and small handwriting is eleven and
more. Typed scripts consist of approximately 15 words per line. A response is considered long if it
goes up to 11/4 pages; overlong if it reaches 11/2 pages; excessively long if more than 11/2 pages.
Note: A few candidates will copy the passage word for word or write in note form. These candidates will
be limited in the mark they can achieve.