Bonding Over Dentin Replacement Materials 2017
Bonding Over Dentin Replacement Materials 2017
Bonding Over Dentin Replacement Materials 2017
Abstract
Introduction: Dentin replacement materials are neces- Key Words
sary in large cavities to protect the pulp and reduce the Biodentine, characterization, dentin replacement materials, dynamic testing, elemental
bulk of filling material. These materials are layered with mapping, glass ionomer cement, shear bond strength, Theracal LC
a composite resin restorative material. Microleakage
caused by poor bonding of composite resin to underlying
dentin replacement material will result in pulp damage.
The aim of this study was to characterize the interface
P ulp capping materials
are used to protect the
pulp from thermal, chemical,
Significance
In vitro testing without the necessary aging may
between dentin replacement materials and composite have limited clinical significance because the
and other noxious stimuli.
resin and to measure the shear bond strength after material performance is not mimicked adequately.
Tricalcium silicate–based
dynamic aging. Methods: Biodentine (Septodont, Saint materials such as mineral
Maur-des-Fosses, France), Theracal LC (Bisco, Schaum- trioxide aggregate (MTA) are commonly used for this purpose. MTA exhibits many dis-
burg, IL), and Fuji IX (GC, Tokyo, Japan) were used as advantages such as difficult handling, long setting time (1), induction of tooth discol-
dentin replacement materials. They were then overlaid oration (2–5), and incompatibility with other dental materials when layered (6, 7).
with a total-etch and bonding agent or a self-etch primer Second-generation tricalcium silicate–based materials exhibiting improved physical
and composite resin or a glass ionomer cement. All com- properties were introduced in an attempt to overcome the disadvantages presented
binations were thermocycled for 3000 cycles. The inter- by MTA.
face was characterized using scanning electron Two such materials that are used as dentin replacement materials include Bio-
microscopy and elemental mapping. Furthermore, the dentine (Septodont, Saint Maur-des-Fosses, France) and Theracal LC (Bisco, Schaum-
shear bond strength was assessed. Results: The Bio- burg, IL). Both materials are tricalcium silicate based but are rather diverse.
dentine surface was modified by etching. The Theracal Biodentine is a water-based cement presented as a powder in a capsule composed of
LC and Fuji IX microstructure was unchanged upon the tricalcium silicate cement, zirconium oxide, and calcium carbonate. The liquid in the am-
application of acid etch. The Biodentine and glass ion- pule is composed of water, calcium chloride, and a water-based polymer (8, 9).
omer interface showed an evident wide open space, Biodentine exhibits a short and clinically suitable setting time and was introduced as
and glass particles from the glass ionomer adhered to an alternative to MTA to be used as dentin replacement material. On the other hand,
the Biodentine surface. Elemental migration was shown Theracal LC is a resin-modified light curable material used as a liner under composite
with aluminum, barium, fluorine, and ytterbium present restorations. The cement component is Portland type, and it includes a radiopacifying
in Biodentine from the overlying composite resin. Cal- material and a silicon oxide additive in a resin matrix (10). Theracal LC does not include
cium was more stable. The bond strength between Ther- water for material hydration, and thus it depends on the water taken up from the envi-
acal LC and composite using a total-etch technique ronment and its diffusion within the material. The hydration of this material may be
followed by self-etch primer achieved the best bond compromised when compared with water-based materials such as Biodentine (8).
strength values. Biodentine exhibited the weakest The manufacturer suggests placement of permanent restoration immediately after curing.
bond with complete failure of bonding shown after de- The bond strength between restorative and pulp capping materials is important for
molding and thermocycling. Conclusions: the success of restorations (11). Etch-and-rinse adhesive systems exhibit stronger
Dynamic aging is necessary to have clinically valid data. bonding than self-etch adhesive systems (12). Bonding composite resins to novel dentin
Bonding composite resin to water-based dentin replace- replacement materials requires adequate research on the material interactions and inter-
ment materials is still challenging, and further alterna- facial characteristics. Etching of Biodentine has been shown to result in destruction of the
tives for restoration of teeth using such materials need material microstructure and enhanced leakage through the Biodentine composite inter-
to be developed. (J Endod 2017;-:1–7) face (13). Furthermore, layering with composite resin has been investigated (14–19),
and Biodentine was shown to be weak. It has been suggested that the final restoration
with composite resin should be placed after at least 6 weeks using either a self-etch
or total-etch bonding system (18). Theracal LC had higher bond strength values than Bio-
dentine when layered with either composite or glass ionomer cement. The glass ionomer
From the *Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; and †Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of
Dental Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Address requests for reprints to Prof Josette Camilleri, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Malta, Medical School, Mater Dei
Hospital, Msida - MSD 2090, Malta. E-mail address: josette.camilleri@um.edu.mt
0099-2399/$ - see front matter
Copyright ª 2017 American Association of Endodontists.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.025
Figure 1. (A) Backscattered scanning electron micrographs at 1000 magnification of the dentin replacement materials shown in the lower part of the micro-
graph layered with composite resin using either a total-etch bond technique or a self-etching primer or with no material preparation and layered with glass ionomer
cement. The restorative material is shown in the top part of the micrograph. (B) Elemental maps of aluminum, barium, fluorine, and ytterbium showing elemental
migration of the elements form composite in the top part of the map to the Biodentine in the lower part of the map.
Figure 1. (continued).
The energy-dispersive spectroscopic images of the materials Aluminum, barium, fluorine, and ytterbium, which are the constit-
and the interface are shown in Supplemental Figure S1 uents of the composite, were all present in Biodentine (Fig. 1B). The
(Supplemental Fig. S1 is available online at www.jendodon.com) aluminum and fluorine present in Fuji IX also migrated to Biodentine.
and the list of elements present for each material in Table 1. These elements were present in the energy-dispersive spectroscopic
Once the presence of an element was known, it could be mapped. plots of the interface (Supplemental Fig. S1). The calcium was more sta-
The elemental maps for all the material combinations are shown ble, and only a minor band of calcium was present within the composite.
in Supplemental Figure S2(Supplemental Fig. S2 is available online The calcium migration in Fuji IX could not be mapped because both Fuji
at www.jendodon.com). The area devoid of any elements is the IX and Biodentine contained calcium.
bonding agent, which is composed of organic components that Material interactions between Theracal LC and the composite
were not mapped. The silicon was present in all the materials; could not be mapped because most of the elements present in Theracal
thus, the elemental exchange between the materials could not LC were also part of Evetric. Ytterbium was present in the Theracal LC
be mapped. The energy-dispersive spectroscopic analysis ex- material bulk. Calcium was once more stable and did not migrate in the
hibited a peak overlap between aluminum and ytterbium, phos- composite. The interaction between Evetric and Fuji IX showed migra-
phorus and zirconium, and silicon and strontium. Thus, these tion of barium and ytterbium from Evetric to Fuji IX.
interactions also could not be mapped. Carbon also was not
included in the maps because all the specimens were carbon
coated for electrical conductivity. Shear Bond Strength
The results of the shear bond strength of composite resin and glass
ionomer cement to underlying dentin replacement materials are shown
TABLE 1. Elemental Composition of the Materials Used in the Study in Figure 2. The composite resin with the self-etch primer was lost from
all the Biodentine samples during thermocycling. The glass ionomer
Elements Biodentine Theracal Fuji IX Evetric was dislodged from over the Biodentine and Theracal LC at the demold-
Al — O O O ing stage, showing the weakness of both bonds. The use of self-etch
Ba — O — O primers resulted in a weaker bond for Theracal LC (P = .036), but there
Ca O O O —
F — — O O
was no difference for Fuji IX (P = .803) compared with the total etch
P — — O — and bond technique. The Biodentine exhibited the weakest bond
Si O O O O strength even with the total etch and bond technique compared with
Sr — O O — the other materials under study (P < .001 and P < .012 for Theracal
Yb — — — O LC and Fuji IX, respectively). Layering with glass ionomer cement is
Zr O O — O
not recommended for all dentin replacement materials tested.
Figure 2. Shear bond strength results of composite resin and glass ionomer overlaid over 3 dentin replacement materials using 2 etching/priming methods of
bonding the composite resins (means standard deviation).
The types of failures are shown in Table 2. The dominant mode of between different restorative materials (21–23). Therefore, in the
failure in all evaluated subgroups was cohesive with the exception of current study, the specimens were thermocycled to evaluate the
Theracal LC bonded to composite resin via self-etch adhesive, which adhesive efficacy in specimens under circumstances similar to that of
showed a dominant mixed mode of failure (Fig. 3). the oral cavity. This step has been omitted in previous studies
evaluating the bonding efficacy of restorative materials to Biodentine
and Theracal LC (14–19). The specimens were only aged and thus
Discussion not processed in conditions similar to the oral cavity like the
The current study investigated the effectiveness of different methodology used in the current study.
methods of layering dentin replacement materials. Biodentine and Plexiglass molds were fabricated by CNC laser cutting to achieve bet-
Theracal LC were selected because they are the materials most indicated ter precision in the dimensions of the filling material in comparison with
for this purpose because of their calcium-releasing ability, which is cylindrically shaped plastic tubes used in previous studies (12, 17–19).
beneficial to the dental pulp. Glass ionomer cement was used as a con- Furthermore, their split feature enables demolding with minimal force
trol because the sandwiching of composite resin to glass ionomer transferred to the lining-filler interface.
cement is a standard technique in operative dentistry. Bonding systems Characterization of the interface and elemental mapping was
and composite resins were procured from the same company. None of performed. Characterization is an important step in the research of
the dentin replacement materials has a recommended brand to be used materials because one can investigate any changes happening to the
for the restoration of teeth. Two dentin bonding systems were used in material during processing and testing. In a previous study, the layer-
the current study. ExciTE F and AdheSe One F are light-curing, ing of MTA with glass ionomer cements had been investigated, and the
fluoride-releasing, bonding systems. The latter is a self-etch adhesive glass ionomer was shown to interfere with the setting of the MTA. In
system, whereas the former is a single-component adhesive used in addition, elemental migration of strontium from the glass ionomer
conjunction with the total-etch technique. The use of fluoride- and bismuth from MTA was shown (6). Biodentine, although also
containing and -releasing bonding systems has become popular water based and with a similar chemical composition to MTA, has a
because of their ability to prevent postoperative sensitivity. shorter setting time and thus should be less affected by layering and
The tooth to material assembly for characterization and assess- preparation procedures. Acid etching of Biodentine was shown to
ment of bond strength was thermocycled using ISO specifications lead to both structural and chemical changes to the material surface
(20). Thermocyling is an in vitro process in which specimens are (13), as shown also in the current study. The maps allow the location
subjected to temperature limits similar to those experienced in the of each element within the structure and have been used in previous
oral cavity. This procedure can produce potential negative effects on studies on interfacial characteristics of dental materials with tooth
bonding because of dissimilar coefficients of thermal expansion structures (24–26).
Figure 3. Stereomicroscopic images of the failure modes in different experimental groups under 20 magnification. (A) Cohesive mode of failure in Biodentine–
total-etch. (B) Cohesive mode of failure in Theracal LC–total-etch. (C) Mixed mode of failure in Theracal LC–self-etch. (D) Cohesive mode of failure in glass
ionomer cement–self-etch. (E) Mixed mode of failure in glass ionomer cement–total-etch.
In addition to the changes in the microstructure of Biodentine after Biodentine exhibited the lowest shear bond strength when
etching and overlaying with composite, elemental migration of compared with Theracal LC and GIC regardless of the bonding tech-
aluminum, barium, ytterbium, and fluorine was shown. The effect that nique. This was predictable because of the resin-based composition
these elements have on the chemistry of Biodentine is not known. The of Theracal LC and GIC. Previous studies also pointed out the lower
migration of aluminum from Portland cement–based materials to the bond strength of Biodentine (15, 18). The dominant cohesive mode
plasma and liver of test animals has been reported (24). Aluminum of failure in Biodentine specimens may reflect a low cohesive
has detrimental effects on the human organs and has been implicated strength of the material itself (18).
in Parkinson disease (25). The migration of bismuth to the tooth struc- The shear bond strength of all dentin replacement materials was
ture causes tooth discoloration (26), and zinc from zinc oxide–based lower when self-etch adhesive was used, especially in Biodentine
restorative material impaired the setting of MTA (6). Elemental migration specimens, which debonded during thermocycling in accordance to
and its effect on the adjacent structures need to be investigated further. a previous study (14). Conversely, other researchers found that the
Calcium migration from one material to the other was shown to be min- placement of composite resin using self-etch adhesive systems over
imal. The presumed migration of calcium from tricalcium silicate–based Biodentine resulted in better shear bond strength (16). This difference
materials to the adjacent tooth structure is the basis of bioactivity of these in the results can be caused by differences in the methodology between
materials and is implicated in increases in bond strength. The calcium- the 2 studies such as thermocycling and the different brands of bonding
rich zone formed in the tooth structure adjacent to Biodentine has been systems used.
termed the mineral infiltration zone (27). This calcium migration has
been discredited by other researchers (28, 29). In the current study,
the calcium was shown to be stable and not to migrate. Conclusions
Overlaying both Biodentine and Theracal LC with glass ionomer Bonding composite resin to water-based dentin replacement ma-
cement resulted in a very weak bond because all the specimens were terials is still unsuccessful, and further alternatives for the restoration of
dislodged during the demolding stage. A weak bonding between these teeth using such materials need to be developed. Dynamic aging of the
dentin replacement materials and glass ionomer has been reported test specimens is necessary to mimic the oral environment.
(17). Thus, glass ionomer cement is not indicated for the restoration
of teeth in which Theracal LC and Biodentine are used as dentin replace-
ment materials. Thermocycling also resulted in the loss of the composite Acknowledgments
using self-etch adhesive. Previous studies evaluating the bond strength Supported by ERDF (Malta) for the financing of the testing
of composite to Biodentine omitted the thermocycling; thus, the data equipment through the project ‘‘Developing an Interdisciplinary
obtained are questionable (15, 16, 18, 19). Material Testing and Rapid Prototyping R&D Facility’’ (ref no. 012).