Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Studies On Tolerance of Chickpea To Some Pre and Post-Emergence Herbicides

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture. 2018.

30(9): 725-731
doi: 10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i9.1804
http://www.ejfa.me/

REGULAR ARTICLE

Studies on tolerance of chickpea to some pre and


post-emergence herbicides
Ijaz Ahmad Khan1*, Rahamdad Khan2, Amanullah Jan3, Syed Mehar Ali Shah4
Department of Weed Science, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar-PAKISTAN, 2Department of Agriculture, Bacha Khan University,
1

Charsadda-PAKISTAN, 3Department of Agronomy, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar-PAKISTAN, 4Department of Plant Breeding and
Genetics, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar-PKISTAN

ABSTRACT
Herbicides application is an integral part of farmer’s crop management in modern agricultural systems. Weeds always cause serious
losses in legumes due to poor competition ability. In order to quantify the tolerance of chickpea against some pre and post-emergence
herbicides, a pot study was carried out in the department of Weed science, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar Pakistan during
2012-13 and 2013-14. The pre emergence herbicides includes pendimethalin and s-metolachlor while, the post emergence herbicides
comprised of Clodinafop-propargyl, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl and di-methyl urea. The chickpea variety Karak-I was sown in the pots and the trial
was arranged in CR Design repeated three times. During the investigation data were recorded on different growth parameters of chickpea
plants including both aerial and underground parts. The results revealed the all treatments had a significant effect on all the examined
parameters of chickpea except nodule fresh and dry biomasses. However, the toxic effect of pre emergence herbicides on chickpea was
significantly higher as compared to post emergence herbicides. The minimum number of nodule plant-1 (17.83), plant height (50.50cm),
and seed protein (14.13%) was recorded in Pendimethalin treated pots. However, the highest seed protein content of 21.75 and 21.15 %
were recorded for control and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl treatments respectively. Thus, it is concluded from the present data that chickpea has
less tolerance for pre emergence herbicides pendimethalin and S-metolachlor as compared to post-emergence herbicides so farmers are
advised to give preference to post emergence herbicides instead of a pre emergence while controlling weeds in chickpea through chemicals.
Keywords: Chickpea; Herbicides; Pre-emergence; Post-emergence; Protein; Weed.

INTRODUCTION responsible for low yield in Pakistan are poor soil, inadequate
moisture, insensitive climatic conditions, weeds and
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) mainly cultivated for human insufficient or even no fertilizers supply (Aslam et al., 2007).
consumption with an annual area grown ranging between Besides all other production constraints, the weeds strongly
9.30 and 12.65 million ha over the recent decade (FAO, 2016). contribute in the yield reduction of chickpea because it is
Being a good source of protein, it plays important role in traditionally grown on residual soil moisture, therefore,
human diet for a large population in the developing world for weed competition poses a major problem in the water use
a healthy daily food (Abbo et al., 2003). Annual crop legumes, efficiency. Loss in chickpea yield and yield components
grown in rotation with cereal crops, can improve yields of increased with increasing density of weeds (Whish et al.,
the cereals and contribute to the total pool of N in the soil 2002). The most important weeds that infest the chickpea
(Fatima et al., 2008). In Pakistan, the chickpea is the most crop under rainfed conditions are Anagallis arvensis L., Lathyrus
important pulse as well as a vegetable crop. On the basis of aphaca L., Convolvulus arvensis L., Cyperus rotundus L., Fumaria
the seed colour and geographic distribution, chickpea has indica, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers, Medicago ploymorpha L., and
two main types, Desi and Kabuli. Nutritional imbalance and Carthamus oxycantha L. (Saxena, 1976).
week nodulation appears to be the distinct ones, that can be
effective only in a single croping season (Aslam et al., 2010). Various methods are used to control weeds in various
crops, including manual, mechanical, cultural, biological
The yield of chickpea in the developing countries is much and chemical. Weeding manually or through animal drawn
more as compared to Pakistan, the factors which are implements like animal drawn seed drill, animal drawn
*Corresponding author:
Syed Mehar Ali Shah, Department of Weed Science, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar-PAKISTAN. E-mail: ijazahmadk@aup.edu.pk

Received: 14 January 2018;   Accepted: 28 June 2018

Emir. J. Food Agric  ●  Vol 30 ●  Issue 9  ●  2018 725


Khan, et al.

weeder and cultivator are effective, however, very expensive MATERIAL AND METHODS
because of increased cost of labour and fuel. Chemical
weed control is a good supplement to conventional Pot experiments were carried out during two consecutive
methods and is an integral part of the modern crop years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 at the Department of Weed
production system (Patel et al., 2006). In case of severe Science, The University of Agriculture Peshawar Pakistan
weed infestation, the use of proper herbicide has become to evaluate the response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
indispensable for the control of weeds, resulting in the towards different pre and post-emergence herbicides.
diversion of nutrient and moisture to the major crop plants
(Rahman et al., 2012). Chemical weed control method is Seed collection
preferred over other weed control methods because it is The seed of chickpea variety Karak-I (Desi) was collected
quicker, more effective and relatively cheaper (Shah et al., from the Agriculture Research Station, Ahmad Wala
1989). Weeds are controlled effectively by using selective Karak, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan during September,
herbicides. On the other hand, the continuous use of 2012. For minimizing the risk of germination failure and
herbicides may cause weed resistance to herbicides and contamination, the seed was sun dried after cleaning.
weed shift problem (Zhang, 2003).
Experimental design and setup
Avola et al.(2008) verified that chemical control determine a The experiments were laid out in completely randomized
significant depressive effect on plant height and grain yield design (CRD) replicated three times. Total ten seeds of
(25% less than manual weeding and untreated plots), mainly chickpea variety Karak-I was sown that later on thinned
resulted a lower number of seeds to germinate that determine to six seedlings in each pot during both the studied years.
a plant density lower than the planned one. Similarly Kumar The specification of each pot was 18.79 cm in height and
and Singh. (2010) observed some morphological changes in 21.84 cm in diameter.
plants while testing herbicides alone and in combination with
other tank mix. Khan et al. (2004) also found a significant Herbicide application
reduction in shoot length under the application of herbicide Initially calibration was made to know the exact volume
isoproturon and 2,4-D. Barker (2007) reported that the lowest of water and herbicides with recommended doses were
plant height in herbicides treated plots was might be due to applied to each pot individually with a knapsack sprayer
the fact that herbicides greatly reduced the weed infestation, having a jet nozzle except the control pots. Herbicides
but affect the plant by reducing the plant height and other applied along with dosage and time of application is given
growth parameters. The pre- emergence herbicides when below in Table 1.
applied to the soil that make the upper soil layer toxin that
not only affect the weed seed germination but also inhibit the Recorded parameters
crop growth as well to a certain extend. Drew et al. (2007) The data were recorded on the following parameters during
reported that when legumes are exposed to several herbicides, the course of study:
reduced the nodulation and nitrogen fixation in these crops.
Alvi et al. (2003) observed a remarkable reduction in protein Plant height (cm), number of branches plant-1, number of
content of Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek) with the application pod plant-1, number of seeds plant-1, number of nodules
of Atrazine. plant-1, nodule fresh weight plant-1 (g), nodule dry weight
plant-1 (g) and protein content of chickpea seed (%).
Therefore, taking under consideration the herbicide injuries
in legumes in term of growth retardation due to improper Statistical analysis
use of agro chemicals a pot study was initiated with the The recorded data for each parameter was subjected
objective to assess the ill effect of different pre and post- individually to the ANOVA technique by using MSTATC
emergence herbicides on chickpea crop. computer software and then LSD test was run at a
probability level of 5%. (Steel et al., 1997).
Table: 1 ‑ Herbicides used, the dose and the time of application during pot experiment on chickpea
Herbicides Dose ha‑1 Application Time/Stage
S‑metolachlor 1 L ha‑1 Pre‑emergence Direct after sowing
Pendimethalin 2.5 L ha‑1 Pre‑emergence Direct after sowing
Clodinafop‑propargyl 2 kg ha‑1 Post‑emergence 45 DAS
Fenoxaprop‑p‑ethyl 2 kg ha‑1 Post‑emergence 45 DAS
Di‑methyl urea 1.85 kg ha‑1 Post‑emergence 45 DAS
No herbicide/Control ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑
* Days after sowing (DAS).

726 Emir. J. Food Agric  ●  Vol 30  ●  Issue 9  ●  2018


Khan, et al.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION with pre- emergence herbicide pendimethalin followed


by s-metolachlor. In earlier studies Khan et al. (2006)
Plant height (cm) also concluded that the application of several herbicide
The analysis of variance of the data revealed that both the groups not only caused growth inhibition but also had
pre and post-emergence herbicides had a variable effect deleterious morphological changes in whole plant or any
on plant height as shown in Fig.1. From the perusal of particular plant organ. Similarly Kumar and Singh (2010)
the data it was observed that minimum numerical plant observed some morphological changes in plants while test
height 50.50 cm was recorded for pendimethalin treated herbicides alone and in combination with other tank mix.
pots followed by 53.66 cm in s-metolachlor that was These findings indicated evidence of the negative impact of
statistically at par with di-methyl urea (55.83 cm). The herbicides on plant growth parameters. Khan et al. (2004)
maximum plant height (60.33 cm) was noted in weedy also found significant reduction in shoot length under
check which is statistically similar with Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl the application of herbicide isoproturon and 2,4-D. The
(58.16). The phytotoxic effect of herbicides on chickpea current results are also in line with the previous work of
plant height demonstrated that pre-emergence herbicides Emenky et al. (2010) who reported the maximum number
(pendimethalinand s-metolachlor) had restricted the plant of branches plant-1 in non chemical weed management
height more as compared to the post-emergence herbicides techniques as compared to herbicides.
(clodinafop-propargyl, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl and di-methyl
urea). The remarkable reduction in the growth of plant Number of pods plant-1
might be due to reduction in photosynthates production Crop plant responds well only when all the required inputs
or slower the translocation of photosynthates to the tops having favorable environmental conditions are supplied.
(Qasim, 2005). Such depressive effect of herbicide on crop The mean value of the data revealed that herbicides had
related parameters like plant height and number of pods significant (P ≤ 0.05) effect on number of pods plant-1
plant-1 was also being reported earlier by Barker, (2007) who (Fig.3). s-metolachlor treated pots produced minimum
stated that the lowest plant height in herbicides treated plots (16.83) pods plant-1 followed by pendimethalin (17.83).
was might be due to the fact that herbicides greatly reduced High (19.50) No. of pods plant-1, were counted in the
the weed infestation but affect the plant by reducing the post application of clodinafop-propargyl followed by
plant height and other growth parameters. fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (19.33). The pre-emergence herbicides
pendimethalin and s-metolachlor when applied to weeds
Number of branches plant-1 in a field it might also affect the performance of actual
The crop canopy is one of the key parameters in term crop plant due to its strong toxicity that leads to low No.
of photosynthates production. More branches and more of pods plant-1.
fruits are expected to increase in canopy. In the present
study the application of pre and post-emergence herbicides Number of seeds plant-1
had a significantly more branch plant -1. Comparison It is a very common observation that when the number
of treatment means in Fig.2 reflects that the maximum of productive seed pods-1 are more in leguminous plants
branches plant-1  (5.00) was verified where no herbicide the higher will be the seeds and vice versa. The present
was applied, but that were statistically at par with post- study (Fig.4) also showed the same trend like the previously
emergence herbicides (clodinafop-propargyl, fenoxaprop- discussed parameters and again the treatments; fenoxaprop-
p-ethyl and di-methyl urea). Minimum (2.66) number p-ethyl and control gave the maximum value for number of
of branches per plant was observed in the pots treated seeds plant-1. The data revealed that the maximum (29.66
and 29.00) seeds plant-1 were found for fenoxaprop-p-ethyl

Fig.2. Chickpea number of branches plant-1 as affected by different


Fig.1. Chickpea plant height (cm) as affected by different herbicides. herbicides.

Emir. J. Food Agric  ●  Vol 30  ●  Issue 9  ●  2018 727


Khan, et al.

Fig.3. Chickpea number of pods plant-1 as affected by different Fig.4. Chickpea number of pods plant-1 as affected by different
herbicides. herbicides.

and control plots respectively. On the other hand minimum herbicide applied treatments on nodulation and other related
(23.66 and 23.67) number of seeds plant-1 calculated for parameters in the leguminous plants are reported by different
pendimethalin and di-methyl urea respectively. Some time herbicides e.g. alachlor, metribuzine and trifluralin caused a
the herbicide toxicity showed long persistence and strong reduction in nodulation in soyabean (Mallik and Tesfai, 1985).
action against all kind of weeds, therefore due to the strong Moreover, the herbicidal application decline in nodulation
toxicity action fenoxaprop-p-ethyl are recommended to might be due to the inhibition of symbiotic process between
apply at early growth stage of weeds probably before legume crop root and with the bacteria responsible for
reaching to five leaf stage (Mu et al., 2007). In the present nitrogen fixation. However, the reduction in the nodulation
study the post-emergence herbicide fenoxaprop-p-ethyl could possibly be due to deceasing in nitrogenase activity
showed a little injury to the chickpea that probably due that can be correlated with the photosynthetic apparatus
to the well establishment of the chickpea seedling before disturbance with the nodule alteration (Zaidi et al., 2005). The
the application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl as this herbicides application of commercial herbicides significantly declines
applied as a post-application to the weeds and crop as the nitrogen content in the shoot possibly due to disturbance
well. While the pre-emergence herbicides when applied to in nodule growth or hormones responsible for nodulation
the soil that make the upper soil layer toxic that not only (Khan et al. 2004).
affect the weed seed germination but also inhibit the crop
growth as well to a certain extent. In other studies Khan Nodule fresh weight plant-1 (g)
et al. (2004) found considerable decline in chickpea yield The nitrogen fixing capability in legume can judge by the
when they applied the herbicides fluchloraline and 2,4-D. accumulation of fresh and dry matter in the nodule. The
Moreover, they observed 46.3% and 45% yield reduction herbicide application in chickpea giving non-significant
in chickpea, while applying high doses of fluchloraline. (P ≤ 0.05) differences among the tested herbicides (Fig. 6).
The analysis of the data showed that the highest (3.05 g)
Number of nodule plant-1
Generally in legume plants number of nodules is considered fresh nodule weight was recorded in clodinafop-propargyl
as an index for accessing the fixation of N2 and efficiency of followed by fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (2.97 g) where as the lowest
rhizobium specie. Therefore, it plays a fundamental role in the nodule fresh weight (2.80 g) was recorded for control. The
growth and development of a leguminous crop plant. Under lower nodules in the herbicide treated pots might be due
the current investigation all the tested pre and post-emergence to limited nitrogenase activity in the affected soil or due
herbicides depicted variable results in term of nodule number. to the leaves chlorosis of the chickpea that were unable to
The data revealed that the maximum (21) nodule plant-1 was synthesize more glucose for the crop plant after exposed
counted under the application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl followed to herbicides. In earlier studies Datta et al. (2008) also
by clodinafop-propargyl (20) where as the least number of reported that the most tolerant chickpea genotype received
nodule plant-1 (17.83) were noted in pendimethalin (Fig. 5). damaged when exposed to higher pH and herbicide rates
Drew and Ballard. (2010) reported that when legumes are and caused leaf chlorosis that significantly reduced plant
exposed to several herbicides that reduced the nodulation and height, nodulation and shoot and root dry weight. They
nitrogen fixation in these crops. In addition the application of further observed that the injurious impacts were more
metribuzine strongly decreased the nitrogenase activity that serious with the sensitive chickpea genotype than the
can be related to the damage caused in the photosynthetic tolerant one. In similar studies (Khan et al., 2011) reported
process and also the alteration in the nodule cortex structure that higher doses of herbicides suppressed the growth of
(Fernandez et al., 1996). Likewise, the negative impact of root nodule bacterium (Mesorhizobium ciceri).
728 Emir. J. Food Agric  ●  Vol 30  ●  Issue 9  ●  2018
Khan, et al.

Nodule dry weight plant-1 (g) Seed protein content


Nodule dry weight plant-1 was not significantly affected Chickpea crop mostly popular for its high protein content
by herbicidal treatments. The data in Fig. 7 exhibited that across the world. The statistical analysis of the data revealed
maximum (0.154 g) nodule dry weight was recorded in that all the tested pre and post-emergence herbicides
clodinafop-propargyl followed by fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (P ≤ 0.05) significantly affect the seed protein (%) content.
(0.152 g) whereas, the lowest nodule fresh weight (0.140 g) The pre-emergence herbicides adversely affect the seed
was noticed for control pots. This reduction in the dry protein content (Fig. 8). The results revealed that the
nodule weight indicates that the herbicide either interfere maximum seed protein content (21.75 and 21.15%) was
with the nodule initiation process or accumulation of the noted for control and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl treated pots,
dry matter in the nodule. The low dry biomass of nodules while the minimum seed protein (14.1%) was noticed
might be due to the disturbance in the nitrogen fixation under the application of pendimethalin. The reduction in
capability. In other studies Grossbard and Davies (1976) the protein content might be alteration in the biosynthesis
reported a non significant variation of the three tested pathway of protein due to interruption of toxic herbicidal
herbicides on the fresh and dry weight of the nodule. These molecules in the system or the herbicide brings alteration
results are supported from the findings of Khan et al., between mitotic variation in nucleic acid and protein
(2004) who stated that root weight and the nodule number synthesis Alvi et al. (2003). The other possibility, of protein
both reduced with the application of 2,4-D that indirectly reduction might be due to the damage to root vascular
affect the nodule dry weight accumulation. The present tissues that decrease or affect the supplier channel as a
results are also in line with those of Datta et al. (2009) result low protein synthesis occurs (Parveen et al., 2002).
who found that isoxaflutole at the recommended rate had Moreover, the direct effect of herbicides on seed protein
stunted plant growth (29%), reduced shoot (22%) and or nucleic acid synthesis not been discovered yet because
root (50%) dry weights of the sensitive cultivar whereas, neither these sides or the primary site of action of any
isoxaflutole had no effect on the growth parameters of herbicides were known (Khan et al., 2006). The results are
the tolerant cultivar including root biomass. In addition supported with the findings of Alvi et al. (2003) they also
isoxaflutole reduced total N content, nodulation (number observed a reduction in protein content in legume seeds
and dry weight) and N fixation capacity of the sensitive after the application of herbicide Atrazine. The decreased
cultivar. in protein and amino acid contents indicate that pesticide

Fig.5. Chickpea number of pods plant-1 as affected by different Fig.7. Chickpea dry nodule biomass plant-1 (g) as affected by different
herbicides. herbicides.

Fig.6. Chickpea number of pods plant-1 as affected by different Fig.8. Chickpea seed protein content (%) as affected by different
herbicides. herbicides.

Emir. J. Food Agric  ●  Vol 30  ●  Issue 9  ●  2018 729


Khan, et al.

application disturbs nitrogen metabolism (Saladin et al., content/view/1010/67/.


2003). Similarly, Hassan (2000) also attributed reduction Datta, A., M. Brian, A. C. Sindel, P. Kristiansen, R. S. Jessop and
in the seed protein content to alteration in the chemistry W. L. Felton. 2009. Effect of isoxaflutole on the growth,
nodulation and nitrogen fixation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).
of protein biosynthesis process. Crop Protec. 28: 923-927.
Datta, A., M. Brian, A. C. Sindel, P. Kristiansen, R. S. Jessop and
W. L. Felton. 2008. The effect of soil pH on chickpea (Cicer
CONCULSIONS arietinum) genotype sensitivity to isoxaflutole. J. Plant Soil,
303(1): 49-54.
The tolerance of chickpea against some pre emergence Drew, E. A., V. V. S. R. Gupta and D. K. Roget. 2007. Herbicide use,
herbicides i.e., pendimethalin and s-metolachlor was weaker productivity, and nitrogen fixation in field pea (Pisum sativum).
as compared to post-emergence herbicides under the study. Australian J. Agril. Res. 58: 1204-1214.
Depressive effect on plant height and grain yield (25% Drew, E and R. Ballard. 2010. Improving N2 fixation from the plant
down: Compatibility of Trifolium subterraneum L. Cultivars with
less than manual weeding and untreated plots), mainly
soil rhizobia can influence symbiotic performance. Plant Soil.
resulted a lower number of seeds or arrest plant growth. 327: 261-277.
The present research also provides a clue to the farming Emenky, F. A., O. Ahmed, S. Khalaf and N. M. Salim. 2010. Influence
community by drawing their attention towards the judicious of tillage and weed management methods on chickpea (Cicer
use of herbicides and minimizing its application in legumes arietinum L.) yield and yield components. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res.
16(2): 189-198.
especially chickpea crop. We recommended from the
FAO. (2016). Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.
present findings that the farmers of the concerned chickpea
[Last accessed on 28 Feb 2018].
growing area may be educated regarding the appropriate
Fatima, Z., A. Bano, R. Sial and M. Aslam. 2008. Response of
use of agro chemicals to overcome the losses in chickpea chickpea to plant growth regulators on nitrogen fixation and
crop caused due to herbicide injuries. Moreover, similar yield. Pak. J. Bot. 40(5): 2005-2013.
experiments with varying chickpea varieties and different Fernández, P. M. C., C. D. Lorenzo, H. Sixto, J. M. Pozuelo,
treatments should be carried out in different climatic zones L. Guasch and M. R. D. Felipe. 1996. Photosynthetic and nitro-
genase activities in Lupinus albus plants treated with herbicides
(Cold and warmer regions) of the country to confirm the
from different chemical groups. In Proc. Intern. Symp. Weed and
present findings and determine the range of validity of Crop Resist. to Herb, pp. 134–136.
the present findings. Grossbard, E and H. A. Davies. 1976. Specific microbial responses to
herbicides. Weed Res. 16 (3): 163-170.
Hassan, H. Z. 2000. Effects of stimufol fertilizer on post-cytological
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS abnormalities and protein profile alterations induced by nuvacron
insecticide. Proc. 1st Inter. Conf. on Bio. Sci. (ICBS) Faculty of
We gratefully acknowledge the Higher Education Science, Tanta University,pp. 448-466.
Commission, Pakistan for providing financial support Khan, I. M., G. Hassan, I. Khan and K. B. Marwat. 2011. Testing of
under Indigenous Ph.D. fellowship programme. herbicides at various doses on the growth stages of wild onion
grown in pots. Sarhad J. Agric. 27(1): 85-91.
Khan, M. S., A. Zaidi and M. Aamil. 2004. Influence of herbicides on
REFERENCES chickpea-mesorhizobium symbiosis. Agron. 24 (3): 123-127.
Khan, M. S., P. Chaudhry, P. A. Wani and A. Zaidi. 2006. Biotoxic
Abbo, S., J. Berger and N. C. Turner. 2003. Evolution of cultivated effects of the herbicides on growth, seed yield, and grain protein
chickpea: Four bottlenecks limit diversity and constrain of Greengram. J. Applied Sci. Environ. Manag. 10(3): 141-146.
adaptation. Funct. Plant Biol. 30: 1081-1087. Kumar, S and A. K. Singh. 2010. A review on herbicide 2,4-D damage
Alvi, S., R. Perveev, I. M. Naqvi and S. S. Shaukat. 2003. Effect of reports in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Chem. Pharm. Res.
atrazine on absorption and translocation of P32, chlorophyll, 2(6): 118-124.
carbohydrate, protein and potassium contents in bean Vigna Mallik, M. A. B and K. Tesfai. 1985. Pesticidal effect on soybean-
radiata (L.) Wilczek. Asian J. Plant Sci. 6(3): 249-251. rhizobium symbiosis. Plant Soil. 85: 33-41.
Aslam, M., H. K. Ahamd, E. Ahamd, H. M. A. Khan and A.G. Sagoo. Mu, J. W., L. Peng and L. D. Ping. 2007. Studies on herbicide
2007. Effect of sowing methods and weed control techniques on application by stage to control barnyard grass in paddy field of
yield and yield components of chickpea. Pak. J. Weed. Sci. Res. cold region. Beifang Shuidao. 6: 40-42.
13(1-2): 49-61.
Patel, B. D., V. J. Patel, J. B. Patel and R. B. Patel. 2006. Effect of
Aslam, M., H. K. Ahmad, H. Ullah, M. Ayaz, E. Ahmad, A. G. Sagoo, fertilizers and weed management practices on weed control in
I. Ullah, A. Hussain and M. Manzoor. 2010. Nodulation grain yield chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under middle Gujarat conditions.
and grain protein contents as affected by rhizobium inoculatioin Indian J. Crop Sci. 1(1-2): 180-183.
and fertilizer placement in chickpea cultivar bittle-98. Sarhad J.
Parveen, R., S. S. Shaukat and I. I. Naqvi. 2002. Effect of atrazine on
Agric. 26(4): 467-474. carbohydrates, potassium, sodium, phosphate and amino acid
Avola, G., R. Tuttobene, F. Gresta and V. Abbate. 2008. Weed control contents in bean Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Asian J. of Plant
strategies for grain legumes. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 28(1): 389-395. Sci. 1(5): 552-553.
Barker, B. 2007. Broadleaf Weed Control in Chickpeas Shows Qasim, J. R. 2005. Chemical control of weeds in onion (Allium cepa L.).
Potential. Available from: http://www.topcropmanager.com/ J. Horti. Sci. Biotech. 80(6): 721-726.

730 Emir. J. Food Agric  ●  Vol 30  ●  Issue 9  ●  2018


Khan, et al.

Rahman, Q. W. U., M. S. Shahenshah, H. Khan, Q. L. U. Rahman, control in broadcast sown wheat under irrigated conditions. J.
D. Ahmad, F. Wahid and Z. Muhammad. 2012. Effect of different Agric. Res. 3: 195-199.
herbicides and row spacings on the growth and yield of tomato Steel, R. G. D., J. H. Torrie and D. Dicky. 1997. Principles and
(Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 18(2): Procedures of Statistics. Multiple Comparison. 3rd Ed. McGraw
157-165. Hill Book Co., New York, USA, pp. 178-198.
Robinson, M. 2009. Re-evaluating the Role of Herbicide in Whish, J. P. M., B. M. Sindel, R. S. Jessop and W. L. Felton. 2002.
Contemporary Urban Horticulture. International Symposium on The effect of row spacing and weed density on yield loss of
Urban Tree Health, Paris France. chickpea. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 53(12): 1335-1340.
Saladin, G., C. Magne and C. Clement. 2003. Stress reactions in Vitis Zaidi, A., M. S. Khan and P. Q. Rizvi. 2005. Effect of herbicides on
vinifera L. Following soil application of the herbicide flumioxazin. growth, nodulation and nitrogen content of greengram. Agron.
Chemosphere. 53: 199-206. Sustain. Dev. 25: 497-504.
Saxena, M. C. and D. S. Yadav. 1976. Proc. Inter. Workshop on Grain Zhang, Z. P. 2003. Development of chemical weed control and
legumes, ICRISAT. Hyderabad India, pp. 31-61. integrated weed management in China. Weed Biol. Manag. 3(4):
Shah, M. I., A. Jalis, M. Ramzan and J. Iqbal. 1989. Chemical weed 197-203.

Emir. J. Food Agric  ●  Vol 30  ●  Issue 9  ●  2018 731

You might also like