International Folklore Festival of Zagreb: Experiences and Dilemmas of Applied Ethnology
International Folklore Festival of Zagreb: Experiences and Dilemmas of Applied Ethnology
International Folklore Festival of Zagreb: Experiences and Dilemmas of Applied Ethnology
ZORICA VITEZ
Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research, Zagreb
The International Folklore Festival (IFF) has been held in Zagreb since
1966. The organizers of the IFF have entrusted the conception and
programme of the Festival to experts – ethnologists and folklorists. The
author has been professional and artistic director of the Festival since
1992 and is also research advisor for the Institute of Ethnology and
Folklore Research. Planning the IFF each year has been fraught with
professional and organizational challenges. In addition to questions
about the purpose of and idea behind the IFF and trying to widen it
programmatically, dilemmas concerning the advantages and disadvan-
tages of tying scientific and applied ethnology and the problem of the
possible politicization of the IFF are always present.
Keywords: International Folklore Festival, folklore inscenation, science
and its application
109
Nar. umjet. 45/1, 2008, pp. 109-123, Z. Vitez, International Folklore Festival of Zagreb...
1 For the purpose of this exposition, I have decided to use the syntagms "folklore group" and
"folklore amateurism" to simplify various naming that occurred with the changed social and
cultural institutions in whose fold such groups were acting (branches of the Peasant Concord,
cultural-artistic or cultural-educational societies and the like). Folklore groups are acting in
larger and smaller settlements, in villages and cities, so that often village and city folklore
groups are mentioned. Village groups are cultivating and displaying the local folklore
heritage, i.e., the folklore of their immediate home area, whereas the city groups gather the
people of varied origins and heritage and mainly have in their repertoire the heritage of
different local social environments. Organized village folklore groups and also non-formal
village groups that are not active permanently and not organized that well, are all desirable
participants of the Zagreb Festival, and the syntagm "folklore groups" pertains to both.
The dichotomy village – city is losing its former meaning nowadays, the once huge and clear
distinctions in culture and the way of communicating are being lost; in the administrative
sense such differences are determined on the basis of the communal infrastructure and the
number of inhabitants. Nevertheless, the folklore groups can be still divided into those which
do not have and those that have their own heritage, although they might learn and display the
foreign. Most often both create their repertoire in the same way: They learn about it with the
110
Nar. umjet. 45/1, 2008, pp. 109-123, Z. Vitez, International Folklore Festival of Zagreb...
The International Folklore Festival of Zagreb was held, from its in-
ception, at several carefully chosen locations. One stage was located in a spa-
cious courtyard in the centre of the city, another in the Upper Town, i.e., in
the old part of Zagreb. The main Zagreb square was always the place for the
happening of the Folklore Festival; the ceremonial opening was held there
and the ceremonial procession would end there. Some of the events of the
Folklore Festival would occasionally take place in Maksimir Park and else-
where in the city. Zagreb's Concert Hall "Vatroslav Lisinski" was, for over a
decade, a main stage for the Festival's programmes. Participants of the Fe-
stival were performing in the area surrounding Zagreb, including the villages
near Zagreb that later became the part of the present-day Zagreb. Their
residents maintained their old folklore groups to the present and participate at
the Festival at the same time as performers and as hosts and observers.
The rules of the Festival envisaged that half of the participants of the
Folklore Festival would be from Croatia, a quarter from other Yugoslav
republics and provinces and a quarter from abroad. At the Zagreb Festival
Croats who lived outside of Croatia also participated, not only those from the
other republics of the former Yugoslavia, but also members of the older
Croatian diaspora from European countries and also folklore groups of the
national minorities living in Croatia. Efforts were made to always gather as
many professional domestic and foreign participants as possible. It was more
difficult to keep a check on the quality of foreign participants, but they were
of interest as a means of learning about the other and the different, often
perceived as a fresh breeze of the exotic and unknown.
For many years, the firm Arto, under the leadership of Petar Miha-
nović, the prime mover of the Folklore Festival, organized the Folklore
Festival. Expert advisers included prominent ethnologists and folklorists, the
key figures of Croatian ethnology, Milovan Gavazzi and Branimir Bratanić,
followed by Ivan Ivančan and Zvonimir Ljevaković as the heads of expert
teams, later inherited by a younger generation of the ethnologists (Mirjana
Jakelić, Stjepan Sremac, Mandica Svirac, Zorica Vitez). The research fellows
of the Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research (former Institute of Folk
Art, i.e., Institute of Folklore Research), the Ethnographic Museum Zagreb
and the Department of Ethnology at the Faculty of Philosophy in Zagreb were
engaged in the Folklore Festival, along with a few other institutions and
individuals. The organization of the Festival was entrusted to Zagreb Concert
Management in 1992.
In addition to the performance aspects of the Folklore Festival,
meetings and conferences of experts are also organized, and the Festival is
help of choreographers and musical advisors. Village folklore groups might have older
villagers in their midst, who learned about their musical and dance heritage through
intergenerational transmission.
111
Nar. umjet. 45/1, 2008, pp. 109-123, Z. Vitez, International Folklore Festival of Zagreb...
always broadcast in the media, especially on radio and television. During the
preparations for the Festival and during the Festival itself, sound and graphic
documentation is made and saved, later to be used for cultural and scientific
purposes. The Festival is accompanied by exhibitions, musical and dance
workshops and publications.
The Zagreb Festival has always received monetary and other support
from relevant institutions and the State and city government. The City of
Zagreb hosts the event and carries a multitude of obligations for the Festival
and its participants, even to the present. The City of Zagreb organizes the
reception for representatives of the participants, where the symbolical gifts
are being exchanged and letters of thanks handed out to the representatives of
the participants. The Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Croatia, the
Croatian National Tourist Board and the Zagreb Tourist Board give
significant sums of money and provide logistical support. The Festival has
been organised under several auspices during its time: During the former
Yugoslavia and also in independent Croatia these consisted of the highest
Croatian state bodies (the government, parliament) or their presidents. After
the cancellation of the Festival because of the threat of war in 1991, the
sponsor of the 26th International Folklore Festival in 1992 was the first
president of the independent Republic of Croatia, Dr. Franjo Tuđman; later,
the permanent sponsor became the Croatian Parliament.
In the independent Republic of Croatia, since 1992, the largest number
of the participants, around two thirds, come from Croatia, and members of the
Croatian diaspora are among the guests from other countries.2 Add to these
participants folklore ensembles from different countries and continents and it
becomes apparent that the Festival is oriented towards the cultural diversity
and richness of the contemporary world. The total number of the Festival's
participants has been decreasing throughout the years; nowadays, there are
thirty to forty folklore groups, i.e., around one thousand people participating.
During the last ten years the Festivals have been organized thema-
tically. The 30th, a jubilee Festival in 1996, was devoted to wedding customs.
Afterwards, other themes were chosen: Folklore of the Croatian Adriatic,
Revived Heritage (revival of folklore groups in areas affected by the war),
2 The Croatian Diaspora is only occasionally represented at the Zagreb Festival, since the
Festival gathers only those folklore groups that cultivate and display the folklore of their
immediate home area, i.e., the inheritors of particular local folklore traditions. Folklore
groups of the Croatian Diaspora, especial those overseas, are rarely organized according to
the particular region or settlement from which they originate, which means that they have a
wide repertoire, combine various local traditions and different traditional costumes, musical
instruments and customs. All these groups are contributing in their own ways to the
preservation of the Croatian identity and heritage, they have their own festivals on which they
represent themselves in Croatia and abroad, and the present-day Zagreb Festival hosts
occasionally some of them.
112
Nar. umjet. 45/1, 2008, pp. 109-123, Z. Vitez, International Folklore Festival of Zagreb...
113
Nar. umjet. 45/1, 2008, pp. 109-123, Z. Vitez, International Folklore Festival of Zagreb...
First among the challenges and dilemmas are those that can be expressed by
the question, should the Festival be changed, in which ways and to what
extent? This question is tied to the recognition of the Festival as distinct from
other similar festivals, and the answer lies somewhere between "freezing" it
where it is and changing it according to some plan. Of course, the Festival has
been changing all along: The main influences have been changes in its
3 The present expert team leading the Zagreb Festival consists of the ethnologists and folklorists
headed by the author of this article, who was given, upon the decision of the director of
Zagreb Concert Management and its Administrative Council in 1992, the duty of the
professional and artistic director of the Festival. The head of the Festival picks her expert
advisors, contingent on the conception of a current Festival, which she proposes to the
Council of the International Folklore Festival. The majority of the expert advisors are the
scientists from the Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research and the associates of the
Ethnographic Museum Zagreb. Occasionally, other ethnologists and folklorists from Croatia
and Bosnia and Herzegovina are taking part in the project too.
114
Nar. umjet. 45/1, 2008, pp. 109-123, Z. Vitez, International Folklore Festival of Zagreb...
leadership, especially its directors, but also some outer circumstances, such as
the influences of power, ideology and politics. The Festival has changed too
because of the incessant changes that are engulfing the society and culture as
a whole. The way of life is gradually changing, as well as attitudes towards
traditional culture, including those of exponents and enthusiasts of the
traditional culture. Changes have come from both above – the organizers of
the Festival, and below – from the participants of the Festival. Every
encounter with the participants, every visit of the candidates for the Zagreb
Festival, attests to the changes that have occurred since the previous meeting:
changes in the leadership, repertoire and in membership.
The people heading the International Folklore Festival lately were
aware from the outset that changes in the Zagreb Festival would be inevitable,
but were not in favor of radical interventions. They tried to preserve the
distinctivness of the Festival by preserving the continuity of the idea, while
looking at the same time for professionally and artistically justified changes in
its programme. They consciously kept solving these dilemmas through
compromise, for example, by introducing the idea of themes to the Festival,
concerts of world music, an increase in the number of dance and music
workshops and a preference for open spaces for most of the events because of
the more relaxed atmosphere these afford and better audience contact.
What part of the original conception of the Zagreb Festival did we try
to preserve? It is the idea of a cultural festival that is about the display of the
local cultural heritage of its participants (music, dance, customs, traditional
costumes), and a preference given to the older forms, but not excluding newer
elements. In a thorough discussion of all of the relevant questions about the
"public practice" of folk music and dance and of the conception of these festi-
vals, Naila Ceribašić named it "the conception of originality" (in spite of the
preceding critique of the term originality) and defined it as a contemporary
conception and practice that is supported by an older practice – that of the
folklore festivals of the 1930s (Ceribašić 2003:298).
Of course, that is only a part of the answer regarding the conception of
the International Folklore Festival of Zagreb while the problematics are a lot
more complex; much has yet to be researched, has been assumed, is
changeable, accidental and, above all, questionable. An inevitable question is,
who are the participants of the Zagreb Festival, i.e., who are the inheritors and
carriers of the local repertoires?
Despite the absence of systematic research, it has been known for a
long time that the members of formal and informal folklore groups in villages
and especially in bigger settlements are not only "the natives" but newcomers
too, who by joining the folklore group identify with the local community.
Members of these folklore groups for some time already, have not only been
agriculturalists, although there are huge local differences in that respect and
differences related to the origins of groups and other cicumstances (for in-
115
Nar. umjet. 45/1, 2008, pp. 109-123, Z. Vitez, International Folklore Festival of Zagreb...
stance, establishing groups within the Peasant Concord branches or other or-
ganizations). It is known that folklore groups have to practice their repertoire
a lot, i.e., that the intergenerational transfer of live music and dance practices
is not happening any more, but the organized, amateurish practicing of folk
music and dance for recreational and performance purposes, albeit mainly
with an awareness of the cultivation of the tradition. Even when the older
members of the community, those who participated in the life of their local
music and dance practice earlier, have some role in the folklore group, the
main role is that of advisors, choreographers and music associates. Their roles
increased as the competence of the members of the community who were the
participants in the living practice of the local repertoire, decreased. These
advisors became the interpreters and mediators needed for the adaptation of
the old music and dance practices to a new purpose – scenic display.
These dilemmas and the lack of clarity are tied to the question of local
music and dance repertoire and the corresponding traditional costumes, espe-
cially because of the existence of the older and newer forms, that sometimes
appear in the same scenic performance.4 Local music and dance repertoire, as
well as the culture as a whole, is subject to permanent change; it accepts with
time the new forms and rejects the old, and it is not possible to define it
within a certain moment or time slot. Nevertheless, when shaping the reper-
toire of a folklore group, one skips that problem and uses the folklore ele-
ments from different periods for the scenic displays needed, i.e., whatever is
known in the community or adopted by it. Since traditional costumes change
through time, it happens that the clothes and the music and dance elements
being displayed are not from the same time period. However, the purpose of
the scenic displays of dances, music and costumes is not the reconstruction of
their history.
Regarding the repertoire, there is a tendency for the participants to offer
to the Zagreb Festival their tried repertoire, the one they used in the Festival
earlier. It is visible moreover that the advisors and members of the folklore
groups are aware of the requirements of certain festivals and they adapt to
them. Their full repertoire is wider, and they choose from it what they
consider suitable for particular festivals. If the expectations of the participants
116
Nar. umjet. 45/1, 2008, pp. 109-123, Z. Vitez, International Folklore Festival of Zagreb...
and organizers do not match, the last word, of course, goes to the organizer,
i.e., the expert team of the Festival, because it is responsible for the con-
ceptual frame and the realization of the Festival's programmes. Folklore
groups and their advisors decide about the conception and repertoire of their
groups; it is said that they often decide for wider and more flexible pro-
grammes, which they adapt to the various occasions of given performances. It
is left to the members of the group to enjoy as they can in the official
repertoire of their groups and to "practice", in unofficial moments, also some
other kinds of music and dance expressions, which evade the influence of the
expert advisors of the Zagreb Festival and other festivals. Interested re-
searchers, ethnologists and folklorists have though, some partial insights
about that spontaneous practice.
I would put in second place dilemmas concerning the purpose of the Inter-
national Folklore Festival of Zagreb, i.e., the question about for whom the
Festival is intended and what goals are to be attained by it. Of course, it is
intended for the participants and the audiences, and it seems that there are
enough of both to justify its continuation.
The Zagreb Festival is a descendant of earlier festivals of Croatian
peasant culture that were organized by the Peasant Concord from 1935. These
two are tied together by the older generation of professional folklorists and by
the participants, and partly by the conception of the Festival. The comparison
to the purpose of the festivals of the Peasant Concord comes to mind, since
they were intended for the affirmation and preservation of the traditional
culture of the Croatian peasantry, and also the whole Croatian national
community, at the moment when it was being threatened by foreign in-
fluences mediated through the middle-class. That was long ago though, and in
the meanwhile a lot changed; two wars, of which one was a World War, and
political and social circumstances changed thoroughly twice. Still, we
wonder: Can we expect today that the cultivation and presentation of
traditional culture on the stage and in the media, folklore festivals included,
contribute to the affirmation and preservation of cultural heritage? Personally,
I believe that the answer is positive, but I know that along with that lofty
purpose there are many other purposes too: recreation, entertainment,
commercial and touristic. The latter is surely going to become more and more
important, and it could be at this time quite a stimulating area of ethnological
interest. It would be worthy exploring who the participants are (age, gender,
professional and other affiliation), and who the audience is of the
International Folklore Festival of Zagreb and what is its role and how can it
be developed as part of the tourism of the City of Zagreb, i.e., its place in the
development of cultural tourism.
117
Nar. umjet. 45/1, 2008, pp. 109-123, Z. Vitez, International Folklore Festival of Zagreb...
As the third point, I would mention dilemmas concerning the advantages and
disadvantages of tying scientific and applied ethnology and folkloristics.
These are the known dilemmas concerning whether the researcher/scientist
should or should not, may or may not be involved in practice; for instance,
does she affect that way the life of the cutural phenomena, how and how
118
Nar. umjet. 45/1, 2008, pp. 109-123, Z. Vitez, International Folklore Festival of Zagreb...
much. Answers are many and varied, and can be further broken down to
questions of quantity rather than to questions of quality of such influence.
Some influence is inevitable even when the researcher appears as an invisible
and unobtrusive observer, since such an observer does not exist. The only
question is, what is her influence and which reactions does she cause? For
scientific purposes, i.e., when the research is done for the scientific
interpretation of the cultural phenomena, it is possible to adopt the role of an
observer, whatever that means, but when it comes to a cultural festival, this is
impossible. Festivals have contents, a programme, participants, duration,
people organizing them, space, technical equipment and more. A festival is
not a spontaneous happening, but an organized one; it has to follow the rules
of the scene and the idea of the organizer of the programme. Researchers and
scientists, aware of these differences and dilemmas, have to decide if they
will engage in applied work too, which in this case means planning and
preparing the programme of the folklore festival. It seems indisputable that
such tasks should not be left to the unskilled, or trained on-the-job or those
unladen with these dilemmas. Moreover, I believe that the double role of the
researcher/professional advisor at the Festival brings some advantages. It
highlights some of the insights into the dilemmas of the profession and into
changes in practices and stimulates the incessant endeavour to apply, to effect
the programmes of the Festival, the progress and the new insights of the
profession (compare Zebec 2007).
With respect to this, it might be worth mentioning a positive example
of the permeating of the scientific and applicative by our associate, Naila Ce-
ribašić, who had, on the basis of her ethnomusicological research on the Zag-
reb Festival, planned and implemented the thematic event about women-pla-
yers of the musical instruments that are by Croatian tradition, typically played
only by men. That peculiar event crossed the boundaries of the usual frames
of reference at the Zagreb Festival, and this was not accidental. The present
expert team is remaining open to the questioning of new possibilities and
elements even when it seems that they are not in unison with Festival's
original conception.
I do not share the opinion that, along with the International Folklore
Festival of Zagreb conferences have to be regularly held (Rihtman-Auguštin
1982; 1983). Although this article was a result of the 40th anniversary of the
International Folklore Festival of Zagreb and the conference on display of
traditional culture and its presentation in the media, the real incentive for
these deliberations stems from the connection between the scientific and
applied activity of the author. The Zagreb Festival exists even without
ethnologic-folkloristic conferences; pondering the Festival is needed by the
profession, i.e., by a few scientists participating in the organization of the
Zagreb Folklore Festival and other festivals. Involved in designing the
programme and in touch with the participants, they happen to be in the centre
119
Nar. umjet. 45/1, 2008, pp. 109-123, Z. Vitez, International Folklore Festival of Zagreb...
4. Questions on politicization
I would stress yet another dilemma that cannot be avoided while dealing with
the International Folklore Festival of Zagreb and that is the question of
politicization, i.e., of the possible manipulation of the event for political ends.
It is known that nothing that is connected to identity and its symbols can
avoid the attention of politics, so such is the case with traditional culture and
folklore.5 Known in recent years in Croatia is the example of political
conflicts and manipulations surrounding Alka of Sinj – the traditional contest
of horsemen in hitting a target (alka) with a lance, a contest that marks the
withdrawal of the Turkish army, i.e., their relinquishing of the siege of the
town of Sinj in 1715 (Vukušić 2007). The Zagreb Festival and other folklore
festivals have always gotten an ideological framework around them that has
been continually adapted to the social circumstances and ruling politics. It is
understandable that the festivals that the Peasant Concord organized were in
the service of the politics of the Croatian Peasant Party, in the service of the
cultural and national revival that the party was advocating. The influence of
politics on the International Folklore Festival of Zagreb from 1966 to the
present day can be judged by the publications of the Festival. It is clear from
5 In relation to this topic, along with the already cited book of Naila Ceribašić and the
dissertation of Stjepan Sremec, I am refering to the texts of Dunja Rihtman-Auguštin
collected in her book Etnologija i etnomit (Rihtman-Auguštin 2001). The author has
recognised long ago the need for new approaches in Croatian ethnology and folkloristics,
and especially stimulated the explorations of a modernity that does not neglect connections
with the past ("transformation of the traditional culture"); she thought about the the relations
between science and its application, possibilities of the (ab)use of traditional culture and
symbols of identity, and stimulated discussions on folklore display and its presentation in the
media (Rihtman-Auguštin 1983; 1991; 2001).
120
Nar. umjet. 45/1, 2008, pp. 109-123, Z. Vitez, International Folklore Festival of Zagreb...
121
Nar. umjet. 45/1, 2008, pp. 109-123, Z. Vitez, International Folklore Festival of Zagreb...
REFERENCES CITED
122
Nar. umjet. 45/1, 2008, pp. 109-123, Z. Vitez, International Folklore Festival of Zagreb...
SAŽETAK
123