FICE Pack
FICE Pack
FICE Pack
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY (FICE)
Accreditation Pack
Table of Contents
Introduction and Aims ...................................................................................... 3
Administration and "ownership" ....................................................................... 3
Evidence base ................................................................................................. 3
Relation to other training programmes and modules ....................................... 3
Summary of Process Requirements ................................................................ 4
Composition of FICE module: .......................................................................... 5
Appendix 1: FICE Curriculum ........................................................................ 11
Appendix 2: Summary of Training Record ..................................................... 15
Appendix 3: Supervised Cases Log ............................................................... 17
Appendix 4: Training Logbook ....................................................................... 18
Appendix 5: FICE Logbook form .................................................................... 20
Appendix 6: Triggered Assessment Evaluation ............................................. 21
Appendix 7: Policy on the Anonymisation of Patient Data (Summary of BSE
guidance) ....................................................................................................... 23
Core Echo Module for Intensive Care Medicine
Evidence base
Multiple international studies have documented the utility of a focused or
limited transthoracic echo study in the management of acutely ill patients,
both within and without the Critical Care area1-4. Most of the studies have
been with modest numbers, and from units with particular expertise in echo,
but consensus statements from a number of international bodies have been
uniform in the call for implementation of basic level echo in critical care 5-8.
Patient population
“Critically ill” refers to patients requiring level 2 or 3 care, but is not restricted
to those within the Intensive Care Unit. A focused echo study will have the
highest sensitivity in the sickest patients, and potentially less benefit in those
who have minimal organ dysfunction. It is anticipated that the vast majority of
cases collected for logbook should be on patients who have either
cardiovascular or respiratory support. Outpatient studies performed on stable
patients in the echo lab are generally not suitable as part of the logbook.
Phase 1
Background reading material and self-directed learning, suggested reading list
will be available on website.
e-learning module available via FICE website
Attend approved basic echo workshop
E-learning
This will be expanded upon in due course. The E- Learning module has now
been completed. This will be mandatory from 1 May 2014. Please click on the
link here http://www.e-lfh.org.uk/programmes/icu-echoultrasound/ A certificate
will be available to download once the module has been successfully
completed.
Course
Attend a pre-approved course on basic echocardiography. A list of approved
courses will be available on the Intensive Care Society website.
ICS will provide a minimum of one course per year to this end. Please see
the website for details of course dates.
Phase 2
Mentored session to ensure basic machine functions and ability to acquire
views
At least 1st 10 scans directly mentored to ensure suitable image acquisition,
this number may increase depending on individual skill acquisition. Some of
these scans may be collected on approved course.
Student performs and records a total of 50 focused echo exams (see below)
within a 12 month timescale from 1st to last scan
Attendance at departmental echo sessions encouraged when possible.
Each exam reported on focused echo logbook report form and images
archived.
Phase 3
50 exams and reports reviewed by ICU module mentor with focused echo
experience
Supervisor +/- mentor carry out triggered assessment
Should be at least 2 adequate views each study, and agreement with main
findings of mentor in majority of cases.
Completed “sign-off” sheet sent to ICS secretariat, certificate awarded for
successful completion.
Further logbook cases / training may be recommended if candidate fails to
demonstrate competence.
Mentor
- The ICM echo unit mentor should have suitable experience and regular
practice in critical care echo. This could be defined by appropriate
accreditation (eg: BSE, CEM level 2, FEEL etc), logbook or by
agreement with BSE supervisor.
- They will be either a consultant in ICM, Anaesthesia, EM or an acute
medical specialty or a member of the BSE or ICS. Those without
regular ICM commitment must be members of either BSE or ICS.
- Responsible for the majority of the mentoring and review of trainee
scans
- Responsible for main “sign-off” of trainee logbook after review of scans
- Must have the ability to refer to supervisor for difficult cases and advice
- Should have access to ongoing training from BSE accredited
supervisor depending on individual requirements
- Must retain logbook of personal cases
- It is anticipated that from 31st December 2014, all future mentors will
require at least FICE accreditation equivalence (by an abbreviated
process )
Supervisor
- Any practitioner with full BSE TTE or TOE accreditation, or equivalent.
- Supervisors wishing to explore “equivalence” should contact the
secretariat for details.
- Should ensure mentor has access to ongoing training depending on
individual needs
- Will sign-off trainee logbook as verification of ongoing relationship with
mentor
- Must perform “triggered assessment” of candidate with mentor towards
end of module
- Has the facility to review scans and accept further referral when
needed
- Is encouraged to participate in trainee teaching when possible
- Should facilitate mentor’s path to full BSE accreditation if appropriate
These are only examples, and each department will have different
circumstances and challenges.
Focused study
Should generally only be carried out on patients meeting criteria for level 2
care or above. A maximum of 10 healthy volunteer scans are acceptable.
Patient details entered, ECG monitoring for capture. Images must be stored
At least 2 adequate views to be recorded.
Image quality (good / acceptable / poor) should be noted along with number of
views achieved.
Logbook report
Must not be entered in patient notes, nor should major treatment decisions be
made on unverified findings – this is a training logbook only
Logbooks and cases must be fully anonymised – please read the BSE Policy
on the Non-anonymisation of Patient data in appendix 14.
Should include clinical haemodynamics, and relevance of echo findings to
clinical scenario
Limitations
A focused study should not be carried out on stable patients to define or
diagnose ongoing chronic cardiac disease eg: stable valve disease,
ventricular hypertrophy or regional wall abnormalities not leading to acute
haemodynamic compromise. A full comprehensive departmental echo is still
the investigation of choice for many patients. Findings from the study must be
related to the clinical scenario, and may change with time and interventions. A
focused study is inappropriate to diagnose or exclude endocarditis. Critically ill
patients are often difficult to achieve good quality images, and it will not be
possible to achieve diagnostic studies on all patients. The temptation to over
interpret poor quality images must be avoided.
Definition of “competence”
Firm evidence is lacking, and training should fit into the existing modular ICM
training structure. The round table recommendations are that 30 scans are the
minimum number to achieve competence in image acquisition. We would
suggest 50 scans as a minimum number for the core module, to allow for
differing levels of skill acquisition. For some candidates, a further period of
training may be recommended. Completion of the module should normally be
possible within a 6 month time period.
1. Cholley BP, Vieillard-Baron A, Mebazaa A (2006) Echocardiography in the ICU: time for
widespread use! Intensive Care Med 32:9–10
2. Beaulieu Y (2007) Bedside echocardiography in the assessment of the critically ill. Crit
Care Med 35:S235–S249
3. Stanko LK, Jacobsohn E, Tam JW, De Wet CJ, Avidan M (2005). Transthoracic
echocardiography: impact on diagnosis and management in tertiary care intensive care units.
5. Morris C, Bennett S, Burn S, Russell C, Jarman R, Swanevelder J for the NPOCUS critical
care echocardiography working group. Echocardiography in the intensive care unit: current
position, future directions. JICS April 2010
7. Royse C, Seah J, Donelan L, Royse A. Point of care ultrasound for basic haemodynamic
assessment: novice compared with an expert operator. Anaesthesia 2006, 61:849
9. Manasia AR, Nagaraj HM, Kodali RB, Croft LB, Oropello JM, Kohli-Seth R, Leibowitz AB,
DelGiudice R, Hufanda JF, Benjamin E, Goldman ME (2005) Feasibility and potential clinical
utility of goal-directed transthoracic echocardiography performed by noncardiologist
intensivists using a small hand-carried device (SonoHeart) in critically ill patients. J
Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 19:155–159
10. Melamed R, Sprenkle MD, Ulstad VK, Herzog CA, Leatherman JW (2009) Assessment of
left ventricular function by intensivists using hand-held echocardiography. Chest 135:1416–
1420
Assessment Tools
Full name Code
e-Learning E
Mentored Practice M
Logbook L
Triggered Assessment T
The curriculum is also mapped to the four domains of Good Medical Practice:
12
Domain 3: Image Acquisition and Interprétation Assessment GMP
Knowledge
Movements of transducer and orientation with respect to screen E 1
Echo windows and standard views E 1
Findings in:
Left ventricular dilatation: left ventricle end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) > 6cm E 1
Right ventricular dilatation: right ventricle (RV) greater than 2/3rds the length of the left ventricle E 1
Ventricular dysfunction: reduction in wall motion and thickening E 1
Regional wall motion abnormalities: regional reduction in wall motion and thickening E 1
Pulmonary Hypertension: RV dilatation, ‘D’ shaped deformity of septum, paradoxical septal motion E 1
Hypovolemia: IVC collapse with respiratory cycle, approximation of papillary muscles during systole E 1
Aortic pathology: aortic dilatation or dissection flap E 1
Pericardial collection: collection in pericardial space, distinction from pleural collection E 1
Pleural Collection: collection in pleural space, distinction from pericardial collection E 1
Skills
Reliably acquires standard views L, M, T 1, 2
Comments on whether image is adequate or not L, M, T 1, 2
Correctly identifies normal and abnormal findings L, M, T 1, 2
Interprets echo findings with respect to cardio-respiratory support at time of imaging L, M, T 1, 2
Correlates echo findings with clinical picture and takes appropriate action / inaction L, M, T 1, 2
Repeats focused echo after intervention L, M, T 1, 2
13
Potential hazardous biological effects of ultrasound: heating/resonance E 1, 2, 4
Need to provide patient explanation relevant to the clinical setting E 3, 4
Skills
Performs focused echo in appropriate circumstances and in ALS compliant manner M, L 1, 2
When needed seeks expert assistance in a timely fashion L, M, T 1, 2, 4
Enters patients details and saves studies L, M, T 1, 2
Accurately documents findings using standard reporting structure L, M, T 1, 2, 3
Takes appropriate infection control procedures M, T 1, 2, 4
Attitudes
Communicates findings with clinical team L, M 3
Considers patient comfort during procedure M, T 3, 4
Seeks regular hands on tuition and review of their echo reports L, M 2,4
14
Appendix 2: Summary of Training Record
Focused Intensive Care Echocardiography
Trainee Information
Name
GMC number
Hospital(s) at which FICE
module completed
Name of Supervisor
Summary of Training
Date of completion
________________________
15
Mentor: ________________________
16
Appendix 3: Supervised Cases Log
Focused Intensive Care Echocardiography
Directly Supervised Cases
Case Brief description Date Mentor’s comments Mentor’s signature
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
17
Appendix 4: Training Logbook
Case Brief description Date Mentor’s comments Mentor’s initials
(when required)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
18
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
19
Appendix 5: FICE Logbook form
Patient Details / Cross reference Date:
Operator:
Other comments:
This is a training report only, and should not be used to influence clinical management without 20
expert verification
Appendix 6: Triggered Assessment Evaluation
Before using this document, a trainee should have completed the following steps:
Within each of the following Medical assessors comments recorded during the Competent?
three sections, the learner assessment (please initial)
must:
1. Preparation for the scan
Greets the patient
appropriately and identify the
patient with the notes
Confirms that the indication for
the procedure is within own
competency
Positions the patient correctly
Demonstrates appropriate
attitude and professional
manner
2. The scan
Sets up the equipment
acceptably, including ECG
Probe selection, handling and
scanning technique
Acquisition of the best possible
image using depth, gain and
focus
Demonstrates all views
available
Identifies pericardium and
describes any pericardial
effusion
Describes LV dimensions
Describes overall LV systolic
function
Comments on evidence of
hypovolaemia
Comments on right ventricular
dimensions
Describes right ventricular
function
21
Identifies IVC in longitudinal
section
Assesses IVC diameter and
collapsibility/distensibilty
3. Post scan
Informs the patient if
appropriate
Records findings
22
Appendix 7: Policy on the Anonymisation of Patient Data (Summary of BSE guidance)
The duty of confidentiality arises out of the common law of confidentiality, professional obligations
and also staff employment contracts. Breach of confidence may lead to disciplinary measures,
bring into question professional reputation and possibly result in legal proceedings.
Guidance is provided to NHS staff in the ‘NHS Code of Practice on Confidentiality’ (November
2003).
http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasse
t/dh_4069254.pdf
Patient information that can identify individual patients is confidential and must not be used or
disclosed. In contrast, anonymised information is not confidential and may be used.
Anonymisation requires the removal of such information from all reports and images.
The NHS Code of Practice on confidentiality means that evidence submitted for the practical part
of the Accreditation process must have all patient identification removed.
23