Hapter: Final Report Preliminary Design
Hapter: Final Report Preliminary Design
Hapter: Final Report Preliminary Design
CHAPTER 8
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
OHL_Route3 is double circuit overhead transmission line which branches at the midpoint of NPP
and WPP and goes to GS5. The location of the transmission line is flat area with an altitude of 10
to 20 m. The ground is good in general. The route of the transmission line is restricted around
GS5, because of the residence. The outline of 230kV transmission line is shown in Table 8.1-1.
The location map of 230kV overhead transmission line after selection is shown in Fig. 8.1-1. A
rough route sectional view is shown in Fig. 8.1-2 and the steel tower which is due to branch is
shown in Fig. 8.1-3.
Route OHL_Route3
Circuits 2cct
From : Midpoint of NPP and WPP
Location
To : GS5
Total Length 10.2km
Fig. 8.1-1
110kV TL 110kV TL
Main
fromNPP to GS5 from GS5 to GS1
Crossing
Property Railw ay Secondary Road Secondary Road Secondary Road
60
50
height
40
above
30
sea
20
level
10
(m)
Fig. 8.1-2 Rough Route Sectional View of 230kV Overhead Transmission Line
Fig. 8.1-3 230kV Steel Tower in the Midpoint of NPP and WPP
OHL_Route3 branches from the 230kV transmission line between NPP and WPP. The
transmission capacity of the 230kV overhead transmission line from the midpoint of NPP and
WPP to GS5 shall be more than 861 MVA/cct which is equivalent of the 230kV transmission line
between NPP and WPP. In consideration of the future substation's construction around the
midpoint of NPP and WPP, TACSR 610mm2 × 2 whose capacity is more than 1,300 MVA/cct
shall be used. Conductor (transmission capacity) and Ground Wire which will be used by EDC's
230kV transmission lines are shown in Table 8.1-2.
Table 8.1-2 Conductor (Transmission Capacity) and Ground Wire used by EDC
Type 230kV (Capacity)
Conductor TACSR 610mm2 × 2 (1,359MVA/cct)
ACSR *1
632mm × 22 (861MVA/cct)
400mm2 × 2 (604MVA/cct)
632mm2 (430MVA/cct)
400mm 2
(302MVA/cct)
Ground Wire AC 90 mm2, 100 mm2
GSW*2 90 mm2
OPGW 90 mm2, 100 mm2
*1 ACSR : Aluminum Conductor Steel Reinforced
*2 GSW : Galvanized Stranded Steel Wire Source: JICA Study Team
Preliminary design of transmission line for this Study is carried out via the following steps 1 to 6.
The preliminary design is carried out from the data which came to hand at the GREPTS (General
Requirement of Electric Power Technical Standards), SREPTS (Specific Requirements of
Electric Power Technical Standards), and a spot.
The main factors affecting the design of transmission line are climatic conditions. In
consideration of SREPTS and the basic design of 230kV and 115kV overhead transmission line
carried out by the Cambodia, basic climatic conditions are shown in Table 8.1-3. In consideration
of not-paved roads and actual dust conditions, the pollution level shall be little considered.
Climate Tropical
Conductor whose capacity is more than 1,300MVA/cct shall be used. Ground wires which are
used at 230kV transmission line between NPP and WPP shall be used. Technical characteristics
of conductor are shown in Table 8.1-4. And technical characteristics of ground wires are shown
in Table 8.1-5. In consideration of IKL, two ground wires shall be attached.
The height of steel tower is determined by setup of clearance conditions. The minimum height
from the ground is set by GREPTS and SRPETS. With this Study, in consideration of going
through the flat ground near Phnom Penh and a large number of crossing roads, ground clearance
is considered as the minimum height of conductor above ground of roads which secures 14.2m.
Minimum height of conductor above ground (230kV) is shown in Table 8.1-6.
- EDS (Every Day Stress) (Tension at 28°C with no wind) is less than 25 percent of the
ultimate strength tensile of the conductor.
Table 8.1-7 Maximum Working Tension and EDS (Max Span Length = 500m)
Type UTS Maximum Working Tension EDS
TACSR/AC 49,030N 33,620N
180,000N
610mm2 (MWT / UTS =27%) (EDS/UTS=19%)
19,620N 13,930N
AC 100mm2 112,400N
(MWT / UTS =18%) (EDS/UTS=13%)
19,620N 14,320N
OPGW 90mm2 98,300N
(MWT / UTS =20%) (EDS/UTS=15%)
* The part where span length is especially short and branch part inquire separately. Source: JICA Study Team
4.0
7.0
7.0
12.0 12.0
12.0
7.0
7.0
12.0
7.0
7.0
.
12.0
12.0
12.0
49.0
49.0
12.0
7.0
49.0
7.0
49.0
7.0
7.0
12.0 12.0
12.0
12.0
31.0
31.0
28.0
28.0
(c) Foundation
The result of having boring, it is assumed that supporters come out more shallowly.
Therefore generally adopts Pad & Chimney foundation shown in Table 8.1-11. As the result
of an additional geological survey, the possibility of the use of Mat foundation use is
examined. The example of foundation type is shown in Fig. 8.1-6.
GL GL
The rough construction process shown in Table 8.1-13 was based on the track record neighboring
countries and in the past. If land acquisition is completed, a process can be shortened by putting
in many construction groups.
There are two 115kV overhead transmission lines in this Study. One is OHL_Route6 which
connects from GS5 to Chroy Changvar S/S. Another is OHL_Route7 which branches at the
midpoint of GS5 and GS1 and goes to Toul Kork S/S. The outline of 115kV overhead
transmission lines is shown in Table 8.1-14. The location map of 115kV overhead transmission
lines is shown in Fig. 8.1-7 and Fig. 8.1-8. A rough OHL_Route6 sectional view is shown in Fig.
8.1-9.
Fig. 8.1-7
OHL_Route7
approx. 0.1km
©2014 Google
Source: JICA Study Team
Main 110kV TL
fromGS5 to GS1
Crossing Tonle Sap
Property Lake Fish pond River Fish pond
60
50
height
40
above
30
sea
20
level
10
(m)
GS5 ChroyChangvar
supporting mainly concrete pole and steel pipe pole Steel tower
The future demand of Chroy Changvar assumes 234 MW (246MVA) of maximum power
demand in 2030 from Table 3.2-8 “Peak Demand of Each Grid Substation in Phnom Penh
System”. Therefore, OHL-Route6 shall have the transmission capacity of 75% of two circuits
larger than this maximum power demand, and it shall use ACSR 632mm2 which has an adoption
track record in Cambodia. OHL_Route7 branches at the midpoint of GS5 and GS1. Therefore
AAC 250mm2 × 2 which is used at 115kV transmission line between GS5 and GS1 shall be used.
Conductor (Transmission Capacity) and Ground Wire which are used by EDC are shown in Table
8.1-15.
Table 8.1-14 Conductor (Transmission Capacity) and Ground Wire used by EDC
Type 115kV (Capacity)
Conductor ACSR 632mm2 (215MVA/cct)
150mm2 ( 85MVA/cct)
AAC 250mm2 × 2 (238MVA/cct)
Ground Wire AC 90mm2
GSW 50mm2, 70mm2
OPGW 70mm2
Preliminary design of 115kV transmission lines for this Study is carried out a procedure
equivalent to 220kV.
The climatic conditions are the same as that of 230kV transmission line.
The conductor which has a track record by the 115kV transmission line is selected. Technical
characteristics of conductor are shown in Table 8.1-16. And Technical characteristics of ground
wire are shown in Table 8.1-17. In consideration of IKL, two ground wires shall be attached in
the steel tower section.
The minimum height from the ground is set by GREPTS and SREPTS. Minimum height of
conductor above ground (115kV) is shown in Table 8.1-18.
Table 8.1-18 Maximum Working Tension and EDS (Max Span Length = 600m)
Type UTS Maximum Working Tension EDS
47,070N 31,780N
ACSR 632mm2 148,700N
(MWT / UTS =32%) (EDS/UTS=22%)
19,620N 14,120N
AC 90mm2 101,000N
(MWT / UTS =20%) (EDS/UTS=14%)
19,620N 15,000N
OPGW 70mm2 78,000N
(MWT / UTS =26%) (EDS/UTS=20%)
* The part where span length is especially short and branch part inquire separately. Source: JICA Study Team
(c) Foundation
As the result of the boring, it is assumed that supporters are deep. Therefore, generally it
adopts Pile foundation or Rahmen foundation shown in Table 8.1-22. As the result of an
additional geological survey, the use of other foundation is also considered. The structure of
Pile foundation and Rahmen foundation is shown in Fig. 8.1-10.
GL GL
The rough construction process shown in Table 8.1-25 is required for 12 months as a
construction period in the dry season. If land acquisition is completed, a process can be shortened
by putting in many construction groups.
The 230kV/115kV underground transmission lines are shown in Table 8.2-1 and the route maps
are shown in the following pages. And detailed cable route is shown in Appendix-4. UG_Route 5
was decided to be excluded from the scope of the Project following the discussion between JICA
and EDC.
GS5
8 - 19
Railway 50m*2)
NCC
©2014 Google
Source: JICA Study Team
NCC
8 - 20
Pipe Jacking Method
(Cross the Road)
©2014 Google
Source: JICA Study Team
The transmission capacity of the 230kV underground transmission line (1 circuit) from GS5 to
NCC shall be 600MVA and the transmission capacity of the 115kV underground transmission
line (2 circuits) from NCC to GS3 shall be 200MVA.
The duct bank system is to be applied as standard installation method of underground cable.
If the direct burial installation method is to be applied, open cut trenching will remain open for
about one month, thus, there is a possibility of hindrances occurring to the life of the
neighborhood and traffic disturbances, especially in the congested areas, narrow roads, heavy
traffic roads, etc. To protect the above inconveniences, the duct bank system shall be applied to
eliminate open cut places.
Moreover, in order to cope with the issue described in Section 4.2 (2) “Field survey of
underground transmission line project of Phase 1”, the points shown below adopt the pipe
jacking method.
- From the technical viewpoint, the duct bank system construction method is very difficult.
(Such as waterway crossing and railway crossing)
- Crossing of a wide road
For the calculation of the current carrying capacity of the underground transmission line (cable),
it is recommended that the maximum conductor temperature shall be 90°C as a mandatory
condition to keep the XLPE (Cross-Linked Polyethylene) insulation in sound condition from the
thermal deterioration/impact during its design life of 30 years.
In particular, if the burial depth is deeper, then the cables may be safer from the outside
mechanical damages, but current carrying capacity of cables will be reduced according to the
burial depth. In Cambodia, the burial depth of underground equipment such as the distribution
cables and communication cables have been specified at 1.2m. Based on the above facts, the
JICA Study Team decided that the burial depth should be a minimum of 1.2m from the surface of
the ground.
On the other hand, the soil temperature and soil thermal resistivity were specified as 30°C and
1.2 K.m/W according to the same specified value of surrounding countries such as Thailand and
Vietnam.
The above-mentioned parameter is the same as that of the Phase 1 Project (Preparatory Survey
for Phnom Penh City Transmission and Distribution System Expansion Project in Cambodia).
The current carrying capacities with related conductor sizes of 230kV/115kV underground cables
shall be shown in Fig. 8.2-3 and Fig. 8.2-4 calculated on the conditions of Table 8.2-2.
1,300
Soil thermal res. : 1.2K.m/W
Soil Temperature : 30 deg.C
1,200
1,100
Current Carrying Capacity (A)
1,000
900
800
700
1cct
600 2cct
500
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000
Conductor Size (mm2)
1800
1400
1200
1000
800
2cct (Single)
1cct (Single)
600
2cct (Triplex)
1cct (Triplex)
400
200
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Conductor Size (mm2)
The required power current of the 600MVA transmission capacity at 230kV voltage is 1,506A.
This power current is too large for the 230kV voltage level.
As shown in Fig. 8.2-3, the power current carrying capacity of the maximum conductor size of
2,500 mm2 is 1,185A which is unable to pass the required capacity of 1,506A at a 600MVA
transmission capacity.
Based on the above study, it is necessary to have two (2) cables per phase to carry the 600MVA
transmission capacity. In other words, a total of six cables are necessary for the one circuit.
From the above calculation results shown in Fig. 8.2-3, dual cables with 1,200 mm2 copper
conductor are capable to pass the required capacity for a 600MVA transmission capacity at
230kV voltage.
The required power current of the 200MVA transmission capacity at 115kV voltage (2 cct) is
670A (133.3MVA/ cct). As shown in Fig. 8.2-4, both single and triplex cables with 1,000 mm2
copper conductor are capable to pass the required capacity for a 200MVA (2cct) transmission
capacity at 115kV voltage. From the result of study in the Phase 1 Project, the application of
triplex cables is preferable due to cheaper civil construction costs.
Typical cable construction of 230kV 1,200 mm2 1-core type XLPE cable and 115kV 1,000 mm2
triplex type XLPE cable are shown in Fig. 8.2-5 and Fig. 8.2-6.
Copper Conductor
Conductor Screen
XLPE Insulation (Nom. 23mm)
Insulation Screen
Bedding and Screen Tapes
Extruded Seamless Corrugated
Aluminum Sheath
PVC Sheath with Graphite Coating
1,200 mm2
Overall diameter Approx. 127 mm
Weight Approx. 23 kg/m
Drum length Max. 600 m
Fig. 8.2-5 Typical Cable Construction of 230kV 1,200mm2 1-core Type XLPE Cable
Source: JICA Study Team
Copper Conductor
Conductor Screen
XLPE Insulation (Nom. 13mm)
Insulation Screen
Copper Wire Shield (1.2mm x 80nos.)
Water Swelling Tape
Aluminum Laminated Water barrier
PVC Sheath with Graphite Coating
1,000 mm2
Core diameter Approx. 88 mm
Overall diameter Approx. 191 mm
Weight Approx. 45 kg/m
Drum length Max. 400 m
Fig. 8.2-6 Typical Cable Construction of 115kV 1,000 mm2 Triplex Type XLPE Cable
Source: JICA Study Team
The study of the construction method of underground transmission lines shall be done
considering the following factors.
Conditions of the road, such as the width, nos. of lanes, intersection, interruption, congestion,
etc.
Underground equipment, such as the manhole of a drainage system, water air valve, etc.
Surrounding conditions, such as land estates, buildings, etc.
Considering existing man made trees and manholes onto the sideway, and underground
distribution cables beneath the sideway, underground cables will be installed under the roadway
especially inside the space alongside the sideway. But Pipe Jacking Method is applied in the
following locations.
- From the technical viewpoint, the duct bank system construction method is very difficult.
(Such as waterway crossing and railway crossing)
Comparison Sheet by construction method between 1-core / pipe and 3-core / pipe at 230kV is
shows in Table 8.2-3.
From the comparison sheet shown in Table 8.2-3, the application of 1-core cable installed into
one pipe method is preferable due to cheaper construction costs and shorter construction time in
the 230kV underground transmission line. If externally caused injury and an accident occur,
replacement of all the three cables will be needed. The viewpoint of this maintenance is also
taken into consideration, 1-core / pipe is adopted.
At the location of a straight road with clear view, and no traffic signal at nearby crossing road,
the pipe jacking method is not necessary to apply. In this case, Duct Bank Method is acceptable
even the cable crossing the intersection.
In this case, location is conducted by each lane to reduce the traffic jam.
Stand facility for pipe jacking method are required. Required size for construction base of pipe
jacking method are shown in Fig. 8.2-8 and Fig. 8.2-9. And Standard Cross-sectional Drawing of
Pipe Jacking Method is shown in Fig. 8.2-10.
One of the points of concern for Pipe Jacking Method is the dielectric breakdown of cable.
Usually, air mortar is generally filled up in a Hume pipe with Pipe Jacking Method. However, by
generation of heat from a cable, if air mortar dries, transfer of the heat to circumference soil will
worsen. As a result, cable temperature is further raised, and in the worst case, the dielectric
breakdown of cable may occur.
For this reason, the structure transmits the heat which a cable emits to surrounding soil, and
emission cooling of the heat is promptly required.
Table 8.2-3 Comparison Sheet by Construction Method between 1-core / Pipe and 3-core /
Pipe (230kV)
Construction
1-core /1 pipe 3-core / 1 pipe
method
Cross sectional
view
(conceptual)
Inside diameter
φ 175 × 6 pipes φ 300 × 2 pipes
of pipe
Maximum span of
Approximately 300 m Approximately 200 m
installation cable
Standard Cheap
Material of pipe (116 USD/m × 9 km × 6 sets (260 USD/m × 9 km × 2 sets
= 6.3 million USD) = 4.7 million USD
Trench excavation,
Standard Somewhat cheap
back filling and
(361 USD/m × 9 km = 3.2 million USD) (318 USD/m × 9 km = 2.9 million USD
installation of pipes
Standard Same 1
Material of cable (353 USD/unit × 9km × 6 sets (353 USD/unit × 9km × 6 sets
=19.1 million USD) =19.1 million USD)
Standard Somewhat expensive
Installation of cable (39 USD/unit × 9km × 6 sets (78 USD/unit × 9km × 2 sets
=2.1 million USD) =4.2 million USD)
Material of cable Standard Expensive
(14,124 USD/unit × 204 units (14,124 USD/unit × 270 units
connection
=2.9 million USD) =3.8 million USD)
Standard Expensive
Construction cost (64,200 USD/unit × 45 units
(64,200 USD/unit × 34 units
of Joint Bay =2.2 million USD) =2.9 million USD)
Standard Expensive
Total Cost
(35.8 million USD) (37.6 million USD)
Evaluation Recommended -
1 Although this comparison was performed in the same cable size, since there is no distance between cable (Phase) according to the conditions,
in the case of 3-core / pipe, increase of required cable diameter may occur.
2.6 m
Excavator Excavator
6.5 m 3.3 m
Fig. 8.2-9 Required Size for Construction Base of Pipe Jacking Method (Start point)
TC-Grout
Hume
Concrete Pipe
JICA Study Team studied the Joint Bay which was necessary for power cable connections. The
structure figure of the Joint Bay are shown in Fig. 8.2-12.
Construction schedule is shown in Table 8.2-7 and Table 8.2-8. Because two or more
construction work teams are introduced, shorter implementation schedule will be expected.
In this project, NCC and Toul Kork Substation construction sites that EDC has been secured
are located in urban area of Phnom Penh City and the site size is too small to apply AIS.
Therefore, JICA Study Team determined to apply the indoor type GIS substation to these
two substations.
On the other hand, as for Chroy Changvar substation, assuming that the site area is
sufficient, the application of AIS substation which has an advantage of cost was considered.
(a) Location
According to the result of the field survey, the location is a south part of the NCC. Fig. 8.3-1
shows a survey map of candidate site, whose size is approximately 30m × 105 m.
In addition, Fig. 8.3-2 shows the single line diagram of the substation.
For placement on site within a limited area, while ensuring access or passage for the
instrument of future expansion of the space required for installation and maintenance work,
the equipment arrangement design aims to be compact.
Equipment except the distribution transformer is disposed in the substation building.
Inside the building, interconnection transformer is located on the Ground floor, 230kV GIS
is located on the 1st floor, 22kV SWG and 115kV GIS are located on the 2nd floor, and
control room and others are located in the 3rd floor. And shunt capacitor is placed on the
rooftop. In addition, since the carrying path of NCC site is narrow, it is proven that carrying
the three-phase one body tank by Schnabel trailer, which is a land transport of normal
230kV normal three-phase transformer, is difficult. As for surrounding NCC, extension of
the carrying path is impossible for the urban area. In order to solve this transport problem,
specific three-phase structure should be adopted. In general, specific three-phase structure
transformer is divided into three tanks for each phase, transported by a low bed trailer and
assembled on-site. Installation area of the transformer to be increased slightly compared to
the normal three-phase one, but can be sufficiently placed in NCC site. On the other hand,
since there is a possibility that the reinforcing road and traffic control is not required by
low-floor trailer transportation, the cost benefit of transport is large.
Appendix-5-1-1 shows the equipment layout image of the substation at NCC site.
Appendix-5-1-2 and 5-1-3 shows the layout image in the NCC substation building.
Detail Designing
Building
construction work
Manufacturing &
Transportation
GIS(230kV,115kV)
Main Transformer
Distribution Transformer
22kV Switchgear
Energizing ▲
(a) Location
According to the result of the field survey, the location is facing the main road in the region
and the route of the transmission line between GS5 and GS1. Fig. 8.3-4 shows a survey map
of candidate site whose size is approximately 25m ×75 m.
In addition, Fig. 8.3-5 shows the single line diagram of the Toul Kork substation.
For placement on site within a limited area, while ensuring access or passage for the
instrument of future expansion of the space required for installation and maintenance work,
the equipment arrangement design aimed to be compact.
Equipment except the distribution transformer and steel-tower is disposed in the substation
building.
Inside the building, 115kV GIS are located on the Ground floor, 22kV switchgear is located
on the 1st floor, and control room and others are located on the 2nd floor.
For the reduction of the steel tower site area, single lead-in steel tower is adopted. At the
steel tower arm-on, the substation lead-in power cable is connected with the overhead
transmission line.
Appendix-5-2-1 shows the equipment layout image of the substation at Toul Kork site.
Appendix-5-2-2 shows the layout image of the Toul Kork substation building.
Building
construction work
Manufacturing &
Transportation
Steel structure
115kV GIS
Distribution Transformer
22kV Switchgear
Energizing ▲
Source: JICA Study Team
(a) Location
For the site selection of Chroy Changvar substation, EDC is negotiating with the company
that is doing large-scale development of Chroy Changvar district. Substation site will be
selected near the lowland where is facing the pond on the north side of the large-scale
development area.
In addition, EDC has a plan for 230kV step-up at Chroy Changvar substation in the future.
Therefore, conditions for site selection are as follows.
• 115kV transmission line route can be secured.
• To ensure the site area required for AIS substation
• The access from the 230kV system is easy.
• To ensure the site area in consideration of 230kV step-up
Since vast vacant land (low wetland) was available around the predetermined Chroy
Changvar substation site, JICA Study Team studied as follows on the assumption that these
requirements are satisfied.
EDC is planning to ensure the land satisfy to all of these requirements.
(Example of the required land size is approximately 180m × 180m.)
In addition, Fig. 8.3-8 shows the single line diagram of the Chroy Changvar substation.
The equipment layout was designed to be compact satisfying the following conditions.
Building
construction work
Manufacturing &
Transportation
Steel structure
115kV Switchgear
Distribution Transformer
22kV Switchgear
Energizing ▲
Source: JICA Study Team
(1) GS3
In addition, Fig. 8.3-10 shows the single line diagram of the substation.
Manufacturing &
Transportation
Steel structure
Switchgear (115kV)
Energizing ▲
Source: JICA Study Team
(2) GS5
In addition to the above additional installation of switchgear, the following items will be
necessarily installed or modified under this Project.
1) 230kV bus, transmission line feeder and transformer control and protection
2) 115kV bus, transmission line, transformer and shunt capacitor control and protection
3) Modification of existing Substation Control System
4) SCADA and telecommunication equipment for the new transmission line system
In addition, Fig. 8.3-13 shows the single line diagram of the substation.
From the point of view of project cost reduction, EDC would like to install 230kV AIS
extension by land acquisition than installing 230kV GIS to the existing vacant lot. Therefore,
site extension is adopted.
Appendix-5-5 shows the equipment layout image of the substation at GS5.
Building
construction work
Manufacturing &
Transportation
Steel Structure
Switchgear (230kV,115kV)
Main Transformer
Energizing ▲
Distribution facility is connected between a distribution substation and a customer, such as house,
building, and factory, and it consists of a pole, conductor, and transformer and so on.
There are 6 (six) grid substations in around Phnom Penh City and electric power is supplied by
distribution lines from each grid substation. Distribution line circuit breaker is installed in each
line, and the amount of power supply is about 10MW in case that the capacity of circuit breaker
is 300A.
Circuit Breaker
case of the new distribution line, it is necessary to select the power distribution system based on
the current state.
Overhead
(b) 22kV distribution line Line
Fig. 8.4-8 Pole Mounted Type Switch Fig. 8.4-9 Indoor Type Switch
(a) Clearance
Table 8.4-13 Clearance between Underground Line and Other Electrical Lines
and sewerage.
At present, it is in situation that buildings are under construction in many places in Phnom Penh
City, it should be prioritized to utilize the existing distribution lines, such as loads divides, in
order to respond to the increase in electricity demand due to the development of those relatively
small.
On the other hand, power demand is expected to increase 10% on average per year after year
2014 due to the large-scale development plans. Power demand is expected to increase rapidly at
candidate sites of new substation ( NCC, Toul Kork area, Chroy Changvar area), because
large-scale development plans are concentrated in these areas.
Therefore, it is necessary to extend the distribution equipment with tuned to these development
plans.
However, JICA Study Team could not confirm the situation that a large-scale development plan
is progressing specifically at the field survey.
Therefore, in this Study, the priority is to divide loads, and to improve the power supply capacity
and supply reliability with tuned to the new grid substation.
The method of loads divides is shown in Fig. 8.4-11 based on concept of Section 8.4.4 (1).
In that way, electric power supplied by the existing grid substation will be reduced and reserve
margin will be increased and power interchange form the other feeder is possible, so the supply
reliability will be improved.
[ Before ]
[ After ]
Fig. 8.4-11 Image of Method of Loads Divides with tuned to the New Substation
As the results of the first field survey, there is a possibility that the new transmission line will be
the same route as the existing distribution line. In this case, countermeasure work will be
required in order to ensure the clearance between new transmission line and existing distribution
line. For example, it is necessary to change conductors to cables and make the supporting point
lower as shown in Fig. 8.4-13.
In addition, in case that sufficient clearance between cable and existing structures will not be
ensured, it is necessary to consider underground cable or route changes by reconstructing pole.
JICA Study Team investigated the route of new distribution line in the following steps, based on
Design Standard Distribution Networks of EDC and information get through the field survey.
However, JICA Study Team has examined what can be expected possibly carried out under
certain assumptions in this preliminary design. Eventually, it is necessary to design in details
after getting the approval of the use of land, and checking the status of existing buried objects
such as water supply etc.
(1) Study of candidates for connection points of existing distribution line (Step1)
JICA Study Team has selected connection points that can be expected to divide loads or improve
supply reliability. And JICA Study Team has taken into consideration to make effective use of
existing facility when selecting the connection point.
JICA Study Team investigated the distribution system based on the design criteria of EDC and
the status of existing distribution line at new substation candidate sites around.
(3) Study of new distribution line route from new GS to candidate of connection points (Step3)
JICA Study Team investigated the new distribution line route between from new GS to candidate
of connection points selected by step 1. And JICA Study Team has also taken notice of following
basic points to consider.
(1) NCC
JICA Study Team designed to expand six new distribution lines, and connection point is indoor
switchgear. In addition, JICA Study Team selected underground distribution system based on
existing line.
One line will be laid in land of NCC to improve the supply reliability for NCC. Other five lines
will be in land of the road, in this case, permission by municipality having jurisdiction over the
road is necessary.
S356 UG 2.0
S155 UG 2.0
S388 UG 2.2
S283 UG 3.0
S160 UG 3.8
*S: Substation (Source: JICA Study Team)
JICA Study Team designed to expand five new distribution lines, and connection point is
overhead line or indoor switchgear. In addition, JICA Study Team selected underground
distribution system based on existing line. In case of connecting to overhead line, distribution
system will be changed from underground system to overhead system at near the site of
connection point, after that it will be connected to overhead line.
All five lines will be laid in land of the road, and permission by municipality having jurisdiction
over the road is necessary.
S478 UG 2.6
S157 UG 3.2
*S: Substation Source: JICA Study Team
JICA Study Team designed to expand five new distribution lines, and connection point is
overhead line or indoor switchgear. Basically, distribution line is overhead system, but a part of
them is underground system based on existing line.
Almost lines will be laid in land of the road, and the permission by municipality having
jurisdiction over the road is necessary. However, around site of candidate new GS is all private
land and there is no public land such as road, therefore the permission by owner of private land
for construction of distribution line is necessary too.
Chroy Changvar is the area where REE (Rural Electricity Enterprise) given a license by EAC
(Electricity Authority of Cambodia) can supply and retail electricity, therefore distribution lines
which owner is not EDC are installed. These distribution lines are supplied from GS1 and GS6
now, therefore supply should be changed from existing GS to new GS. Furthermore, connection
point between EDC grid and REE line should be changed by discuss with REE.
In addition, modification work of existing distribution line will be necessary because a part of
new 115kV transmission lines will be installed at same route as distribution line.
[NCC]
Procurement of Goods
Install switchgear
Energizing
[Toul Kork]
Procurement of Goods
Install switchgear
Assembling
Energizing
[Chroy Changvar]
Procurement of Goods
Assembling, String
Install switchgear
Energizing
Source: JICA Study Team
CHAPTER 9
Table 9.1-1 shows the balance sheets for 2009 to 2012 from the EDC's annual reports. The table
is added with the liquidity ratios and own equity ratios calculated by the study team. The liquidity
ratio shows the continuous improvement during the period, and exceeded 150% in 2012. This
means that EDC owns current asset enough to cover short-term debts, which is an index of
financial healthiness of EDC. Throughout the period, the own equity ratio was kept at around
40%, showing the company’s effort to keep the balance between the debt and the equity under
expansive conditions.
Table 9.1-2 is the profit and loss statement for the same period. EDC's revenue has been
increasing along with the expanding electricity sales. The profit has been expanding accordingly.
After 2009, both the revenue and profit almost doubled. On the side of expenditures, the cost of
purchase of power is prominent. The prices of power purchase from surrounding countries can be
a risk factor to EDC's finance. Interview to EDC revealed that there was no particular risk hedge
measure taken for currency exchange rate fluctuation, but it set the upper limit on price of power
purchases from IPPs (Independent Power Producer(s)). Also, the increase of salaries is significant,
which reflects almost 10 % annual increase of man powers in recent years and its management
policy "to provide its employee with competitive remuneration and benefits to ensure good living
conditions ".
Finally, the cash flow for the same period is shown in Table 9.1-3. In 2012, Cambodian Riel 140
billion was invested in physical assets, out of net inflow of Cambodian Riel 300 billion. This
investment activity still left Cambodian Riel 170 billion in the year. Considering the further
increase of electricity demand and resulting sales, EDC will likely be able to continue its
investment activity no less than in 2012 for coming years. For 2012, the increase of borrowing
was expansive, so was the repayment. However, as pointed out with the Balance Sheet, the equity
and debt have been in balance, showing the EDC’s effort to keep the financial position to be able
to invest, supported by expansive demand for electricity.
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 107,552,731 136,106,561 119,359,946 169,921,065
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year 45,798,220 153,350,951 289,457,512 408,817,458
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year 153,350,951 289,457,512 408,817,458 578,738,523
Source: EDC Annual Report, modified by Study Team for consistency
At present, EDC and the IPPs generate power, and the EDC transmits and distributes power
exclusively to the Phnom Penh metropolitan area. The following is an organizational chart of
EDC.
DMD of Administration DMD of Finance and Business DMD of Planning and Technique DMD of Rural Electrification Fund
ENG KUNTHEA (DMD) CHHUNG UNG (DMD) PRAING CHULASA (DMD) KEO VIRAC (DMD)
Administration Department Finance and Accounting Dep. Corporate Planning &Project Dep. Rural Electrification Fund Dep.
LY TIKHEA SIN SOVANNY CHUN PISETH LOEUNG KEOSELA
Administration Office Finance Office International Cooperation Office Admin-Finance Office
DY LIM CHEA BUNTHAN PHAL SAMBATH CHHOEM SOPHEAK
Protocol Office Accounting Office Planning Management Information Technical Planning Monitoring and
System and Tariff Office Evaluation Office
CHAN VIBOLLA KEO PICH TEK SOCHEAT KIM RITHY
Construction Office Centralization Office Technical Office Procurement Department
MA SAM AL SENG SOKHA CHEA SA EM CHANTARA NGETH SOKHAN
Personnel Office Corporate Finance Office Project Management Office Ⅰ Project Procurement Office
TOUCH SOPHANY LOEUNG BUNTHAN SOR PENGKHY DORK SOVANMONY
Payroll Office Project Management Office IⅠ EDC Procurement Office
SHHOU SOK LENG PHUNG TOLANY HENG SOCHEATH
Litigation Office Business and Distribution Dept. Private Project Management Office Warehouse and Logistic Office
CHEA MONIRATH CHEA SIN HEL EAV RIT TOUCH ROS BUTH THA
Infirmary Distribution Network Unit S.E. & Public Relation Administration Section
SONG PEP HANG TOUCH Office TEP NARANN
Institute of Electrical Science Dispatching Command Center System Analysis & GIS Office
OUM PISETH OR VADDHANA THACH
Administration and Accounting Office Electrical Equipment Unit Secretariat
HONG KHEMROATH TOUK MENG SRUN
Foundation Year Department Workshop Unit Transmission Department
MENG SOTHA CHHUN TY NOU SOKHON
Academy Affair Office Material Supply Planning Office National Control Center (Unit)
TIM CHANMAHONG CHRA TRY LIM SISOPHORN
Technical Training Office Distributive Technical Office Transmission System Unit
SY MOENG OUK CHETRA MAK THORN
Electrical Department Electrical energy loss Management Office Relay Protection Office
SOK PAL OUK VUTHY KHY SOKHAN
Customer Office Administration Division
MIN CHANTHUL SOK CHAMNAB
organizations related to
the project only
Fig. 9.2-1 Organizational Chart of EDC (organizations related to the project only)
The PMO (Project Management Office)-I or II under the Corporate Planning & Project Department
manages the projects funded by international organizations.
The O&M of the existing substation (GS1, GS2, GS3, GS4) are carried out by the substation head
+ operator (each 3 operators of 4 groups), and a total of 13 staff (excluding the security guard).
The SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) system has already been introduced
into all substations, and NCC (National Control Center) has the equipment that can acquire
operational data and information on the substation directly from NCC. However, the signal is not
transferred by the difference of the protocol of the SCADA system between NCC and the
substations. Because the counter test has not been executed even if the data and information can
be taken into the NCC SCADA system, these are inaccurate and untrustworthy. Therefore, the
NCC SCADA system does not function.
About this protocol problem, the Chinese consultant employed by EDC conducted the
investigation and already prepared the countermeasure.
Given that EDC promotes a lot of Projects, EDC will decide which organization executes this
Project immediately before this Project starts. However, it is assumed that PMO will be in charge
for this Project.
JICA Study Team believes that the PMOs have enough capacity to implement the project with
the technical advice of a consultant, since they have been doing the same kind of work. It is
necessary to consider that there is no engineer who is well versed in 230kV/115kV underground
cable at EDC because this equipment is the first time to set up in Cambodia except Phase 1
project which is under selection of the Consultant. Concretely, EDC establishes a system to
acquire a sufficient amount of technical knowhow by participating in the construction of the
Project and the engineer who can become the person in charge of O&M of the 230kV/115kV
underground cable in the future is arranged in the PMO of this Project.
Moreover, to achieve good technical skills, overseas training in Japan is recommended at the
construction stage. In Japan, there is many experience about maintenance of 230kV/115kV
underground cable. Therefore if EDC engineers take training by Power Company in Japan,
improvement in technical skill is expectable. This training will be conducted by the Consultant at
construction stage.
(2) O&M
It is expected that the Transmission Dept. and Business and Distribution Dept. of EDC will be
responsible for the O&M of the new facilities after construction is completed. The Transmission
Department was separated from the former Transmission and Distribution Department in 2007.
They have enough experience in the maintenance of the distribution system, but, limited
experience in transmission system maintenance work.
Given that 230kV/115kV underground cable is basically laid underground, daily checks and
patrols are unnecessary, and a special organization for O&M is unnecessary. However, it is
important to grasp the buried position and depth accurately from the perspective of checking the
relation between the other underground structures and to take proper action in the event of some
abnormality. It is necessary to acquire information on the construction dug up near the location
laid underground at an early stage so that the underground cable may evade the risk of being
affected by other construction work, and to urge the execution of countermeasures for those who
execute construction.
Same as the Phase 1, it is advisable that 13 staff should be assigned arranged at the newly
established substation for O&M as well as the existing substations. The O&M of substation are
planned by the substation head + operator (each 3 operators of 4 groups).
CHAPTER 10
EVALUATION OF PROJECT
The effects to be realized by this Project were already discussed in Chapter 3; to alleviate
insufficiency of distribution transformer capacity in the Phnom Penh system, to improve the
stability of the whole Phnom Penh power system, and to reduce system losses, etc., among which
the alleviation of the insufficiency of distribution transformer capacity has the most notable
quantitative effect. This effect was chosen to be the subject of the evaluation of the benefit
brought about by the Project.
The electricity demand in the Phnom Penh system has been, and will be increasing at a very high
rate. Before the expected completion of this Project in 2020, there will be the increase of the
capacity of distribution transformers scheduled to be in place including those of Phase 1 Project.
Even after the completion of this Project, the demand will soon exceed the augmented capacity.
Under such a circumstance, the estimation of the effect on the increase of energy sales made
possible by this Project required a modeling of the working of transformers in three substations to
be constructed by the Project. This model is explained by the illustration shown in Fig. 11.1-1,
where MW0: transformer capacity without the Project, MW1: transformer capacity with the
Project, and abc: daily duration curve.
Transformers installed by the Project will work, a
MW1
just after the completion of the Project, for three
hours at around each of two daily demand peaks. MW0
The energy distributed through the transformers b
is shown in the shaded area in the figure. The
demand will be increasing: the installed
transformers will work for twelve hours
sometime later, and will eventually reach full c
capacity operation. This process is assumed to 6 12 24
unfold during the period between 2020 and 2030,
and thereafter, transformers are assumed to be Fig. 10.1-1 Model of Energy Sales
working constantly at full capacity. Increase
Source: JICA Study Team
On the basis of this assumption, the effect of the
Project was calculated for the period between 2020 to 2030, which is shown in the table below,
where; a. power demand, b. energy demand, c. additional energy to be distributed through three
transformers installed by the Project, and d. additional energy to be delivered to customers
(additional energy sold). Between c and d, distribution loss 3% was considered.
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
a. Power Demand (MW) 954 1,061 1,169 1,277 1,387 1,496 1,652 1,809 1,967 2,126 2,285
b. Energy Demand (GWh) 5,767 6,414 7,065 7,721 8,381 9,045 9,988 10,936 11,890 12,849 13,813
c. Additional energy distributed
through three new 222 277 333 388 443 665 887 1,109 1,330 1,552 1,774
transformers (GWh)
d. Additional energy sold
215 269 323 376 430 645 860 1,075 1,291 1,506 1,721
(GWh)
Source: JICA Study Team
In financial evaluation, the benefit is defined by the increase of sales for additional energy
delivered to customers by the Project, and the cost consists of expenses incurred for the
implementation and operation of the Project, and expenses for the purchase of additional energy
with which additional sales will be possible. The financial viability of the Project is evaluated in
terms of FIRR (Financial Internal Rate of Return). The conditions of the evaluation are as
follows;
Project Period 30 years (consisting of 5-year construction and 25-year operation periods),
Income energy sales, sold for KHR 782 per kWh (obtained by the electricity sales
divided by energy sold, figures from EDC Annual Report, energy sold is
subject to 3% distribution loss),
Cost energy purchase cost, for US¢ 10.5 per kWh (energy purchased allows for 7%
transmission loss), annual O&M (Operation and Maintenance) cost of
equipment installed: 3% of project cost less taxes (subject to inflation)
depreciation straight line method, 20 years,
Inflation 4.4% p.a.
tax corporate income tax 20%.
Where necessary, the exchange rates between currencies as shown in Chapter 9 were applied.
Unit cost of energy purchase, US¢ 10.5 per kWh, was assumed in the following manner;
As of 2014, the prices of energy from IPP (Independent Power Producer)-hydro and IPP-thermal
(coal) are US¢ 8.0 and US¢ 11.0 per kWh, respectively. The price of IPP-thermal is likely to rise
due to the price hike of imported coal. Annual rise of IPP thermal price was assumed to be 3%,
on the basis of coal price change forecast by IEA 1.
EDC has set the upper limit of IPP thermal energy purchase price at US¢ 13.0 per kWh. If we
apply 3% p.a. rise on 2014 IPP-thermal energy price US¢ 11.0, it will exceed US¢ 13.0 in 2020,
when the project is expected to start operation. Therefore, IPP-thermal energy purchase price for
the project is assumed at US¢ 13.0 per kWh.
1
World Energy Outlook 2013, International Energy Agency
According to the Power Development Master Plan that EDC is currently preparing, EDC will be
securing energy mostly from IPP-hydro and IPP-thermal in 2020 and onward, and their
proportions will be approximately 50:50. The unit cost of energy purchase was thus derived from
the average of IPP-hydro price and IPP-thermal price for 2020, US¢ 10.5 per kWh.
To meet the fast growing demand, EDC will have to largely depend on ongoing and
under-planning IPP projects for securing energy in coming years. However, in the long run, more
risk-prone hydro development may fall behind schedule, which pushes up the proportion of
IPP-thermal in the energy procurement. Sensitivity analysis discussed later deals with this risk,
assuming that the proportion of IPP-thermal increases from 50 % in 2020 to 80% in 2030 and
stays thereafter. The (weighted) average cost of energy purchase would be US¢ 12.0 per kWh in
2030.
Cash flow was calculated for the conditions mentioned above, and FIRR defined by the return on
the own fund (Equity IRR) and by the return on the whole investment cost (Project IRR) were
obtained.
Equity IRR, which shows the financial return on the own fund spent by the project proponent,
was calculated at 25.0 %. According to the interview to EDC, the electric utility is able to secure
fund from its main bank at an interest rate of 7% p.a. Taking this as the cost of capital, Equity
IRR 25.0% is well above the cost of capital. Therefore, the Project is judged to be financially
viable.
Meanwhile, the Project IRR, which is the return on the Project as a whole without identifying
financing sources, for the same conditions otherwise, was 12.9%. This means that if the interest
rate of the loan secured for part of the initial investment cost of the project was lower than 12.9 %,
the return on its own fund (that is Equity IRR) will always be above 12.9 %. This is also a strong
indication that the Project will be financially sound.
A series of sensitivity tests was conducted for the cash flow analysis discussed above. The
following adverse conditions were considered in the tests,
a) overrun of project cost +10%
b) downward deviation of energy sales -10%
c) price hike of imported energy proportion of IPP-thermal gradually rises from 50%
in 2020 to 80% in 2030
d) simultaneous occurrence of the above three conditions
The results are shown in the table below. In either setting, Equity IRR exceeds the deemed cost of
capital, 7%, suggesting the financial robustness of the Project. NPV (Net Present Value) of the
Project, obtained with an SDR (Social Discount Rate) 12.0%, base year 2014, for each condition
is also shown in the table.
To obtain economic cost of the Project, the following adjustments were made to the financial cost
used in the financial analysis;
value added tax (VAT) : not included in the economic cost as it is a transfer
within the Cambodian economy,
foreign currency portion of project : the estimated cost was deemed to be "border price
cost basis" and used as they were, except that the import
tax was deducted,
local currency portion of project cost : to be converted to "shadow price basis" by multiplying
the Standard Conversion Factor (SCF) 0.9,
land acquisition cost and : these costs were deemed to represent the opportunity
compensation costs of relevant assets, and used as they were,
O&M cost, management cost of EDC : the estimated costs were used as they were.
On the other hand, the economic benefit of the Project was estimated by an alternative method, in
the following manner.
This Project will involve transmission lines, substations and distribution lines, and the only
plausible alternative to the Project was diesel-powered privately owned generating equipment.
The Project is then deemed to realize the benefit by replacing the energy generated with less
efficient private diesel units.
The cost of such diesel generation was studied somewhere else: one of such examples of recent
years is an ADB's study 2 where the unit cost was estimated at US$0.47/kWh for non-household
users. However, this study was for the rural areas of Cambodia, and may possibly lead to too high
an estimate. Meanwhile, the final report of the Phase 1 project preceding this Project used
US$0.20/kWh in the economic analysis as a cost of the alternative, having made reference to the
contract tariff in the PPSEZ (Special Economic Zone in Phnom Penh), US$0.193/kWh. A private
electricity service for PPSEZ has a certain size, and probably includes provision of distribution
2 Proposed Loan and Administration of Loan Kingdom of Cambodia: Medium-Voltage Sub-Transmission Expansion Sector Project, Report and
Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors, Project Number: 42361, November 2012, Asian Development Bank
network. These characteristics of PPSEZ are good attributes to be deemed as an alternative to this
Project. The latest annual report of EAC3 shows the licensed tariff of Colben Energy PPSEZ
Limited which operates in PPSEZ, to be US$0.2016/kWh for the year 2013. This tariff was used
as a cost of alternative energy to the Project, therefore, the unit benefit of the Project, in the
economic analysis.
The economic cost and benefit were calculated in the method discussed above, and compared to
obtain the EIRR (Economic Internal Rate of Return).
As a result, EIRR was obtained at 17.5 %. The SDR, against which EIRR is compared, should be
12%, considering the present economic development status of Cambodia. The obtained EIRR
17.5% is well above SDR 12%. Therefore, the Project is expected to be economically viable.
The sensitivity test was conducted for the EIRRs. The same adverse conditions as in the financial
analysis were considered. The results are shown in the table below. Under either condition, the
EIRR was shown to exceed 12%. In summary, the Project is considered to remain economically
efficient, and expected to contribute the economy of the country under various unfavorable
conditions.
One of the benefits of the Project is a reduction of system losses. The energy equivalent to the
reduction of system losses is the avoided production of energy realized by the Project. Therefore,
CO2 that was to be emitted in relation to the production of the energy is the reduction of CO2
emission due to the Project.
In order to compare a system loss when the Project is carried out with a system loss when the
Project is not carried out, the result shown in Fig. 3.3-11 was first assumed to be a state when the
Project is carried out. On the other hand, as the case where the Project is not carried out, it
assumed that new distributing substations do not exist, and analysis was carried out where the
load of the substations is allocated to existing distributing substations (overload is ignored).
When annual energy losses are calculated from the result, they become the following values and
the difference is 16,180MWh.
3 The Annual Report on Power Sector of the Kingdom of Cambodia 2014 Edition, Electricity Authority of Cambodia
There is an example of the study on CO2 emission factor for EDC's power grid published 4 by a
Japanese research institute IGES (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies). However, the
study period for Phnom Penh grid was 2007-2009, after which the import of power has grown
greatly. Further, the power demand for Phnom Penh grid for 2020 is forecast to be four times as
large as in 2009.
The emission factor obtained in the aforementioned study cannot be used as it is. The study's
result was modified to be used in the assessment here, as below.
a) The generated energy of power stations connected to Phnom Penh grid in 2008 was largest at
1,227GWh, and the emission factor for the year was 0.6951 t-CO2/MWh (GES study report),
b) The demanded energy in 2020 was estimated to be 5,767GWh in this report,
c) The difference of energy in a) and b) above is assumed to be filled with imported power from
Vietnam, whose CO2 emission is 0.429t-CO2/MWh (IEA report 5),
d) using the energy in a) and b) above to weight-average the emission factors (0.6951 and 0) to
obtain the emission factor for 2020.
Using this factor, the reduction of CO2 emission by the Project was calculated to be 7,857 t-CO2
per year, as shown in the table below.
4 Grid Emission Factor of the Phnom Penh Electricity Grid, 2011, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies
5 CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, International Energy Agency, 2013
As operation and effect indicators for performing an ex-post valuation, three indicators shown in
Table 10.2-1 are proposed.
Besides, it can be targeted at connection and distribution transformers and transmission lines
regarding the facility availability factor and the electricity supply. However, since the power flow
of the facility of those other than distributing transformers depends on the operation conditions of
the system at the evaluation time greatly. For example, the power flow changes with operation
status (opening-and-closing status) of 115kV transmission lines. Therefore, they are unsuitable as
indicators and the facility availability factor and the electricity supply of only a distributing
transformer are proposed as indicators here.
The targeted values are set up aiming at the two-year back (2022) of the project completion.
The targeted values of operation and effect indicators are shown in Table 10.2-2. Besides, the
facility availability factor was calculated by making the demand estimate value in 2022 of each
substation into a maximum load value.