1 s2.0 S1566119910002909 Main2010
1 s2.0 S1566119910002909 Main2010
1 s2.0 S1566119910002909 Main2010
Organic Electronics
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/orgel
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: We present the results of applying multi-layer graphene (MLG) films as transparent con-
Received 9 August 2010 ductive electrodes in organic photovoltaic devices (OPVs). The MLG films synthesized at
Received in revised form 29 August 2010 different growth temperatures by chemical vapor deposition were applied to OPVs. The
Accepted 30 August 2010
performance of OPVs with 1000 °C-grown MLG films was found to be the best with a power
Available online 9 September 2010
conversion efficiency (PCE) of 1.3%. The PCE was further enhanced when a hole-blocking
TiOX layer was inserted in the device structure, resulting in a PCE of 2.6% which is a sig-
Keywords:
nificantly higher efficiency compared to other previously reported graphene-adopted pho-
Graphene
Photovoltaics
tovoltaic cells. Our demonstration of the PCE-increase in the graphene-electrode OPVs may
Transparent electrode foster the application of the fast-progressing graphene technology toward more practical
TiOX OPV technology.
Chemical vapor deposition Ó 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1566-1199/$ - see front matter Ó 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.orgel.2010.08.018
M. Choe et al. / Organic Electronics 11 (2010) 1864–1869 1865
Tung et al. [5] reported organic bulk-heterojunction (BHJ) was rapidly cooled to room temperature (>200 °C/min ini-
photovoltaic cells with modified graphene films compos- tially and slower later) to suppress excessive precipitation
ited with carbon nanotubes and demonstrated a 0.85% of carbon atoms. Finally, the graphene film was released
PCE. More recently, Wang et al. [14] used functionalized from the Ni substrate by etching Ni in an aqueous solution
graphene films in organic BHJ photovoltaic cells and re- of iron chloride (FeCl3) [4]. The CVD-synthesized MLG film
ported an improved PCE of 1.71%. Overall, BHJ photovoltaic was transferred onto a glass substrate to form the
cells with graphene electrodes have exhibited PCEs below anode for OPV. Before a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)
2% to date [5,11,14–17]. These PCEs are only proof-of- poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) layer was spin coated
concept and are far below the best performance obtained on top of the graphene film, the graphene film was under-
from organic solar cells made with ITO electrodes. Values gone an ozone treatment to produce the hydrophilic sur-
of 6.1% [24], with a BHJ structure, and 6.5% [25], with a face, which was a necessary step to increase the coating
tandem cells structure, have both been reported by the efficiency of PEDOT:PSS on graphene. Next, the photo-
research group of Heeger and Lee, one of co-authors of this active BHJ composite of poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT)
paper. Recently, a PCE of 6.7% has been reported from an and [6,6]-phenyl-C61 butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM)
organic BHJ structure with low bandgap polymers having was spin coated on top of the PEDOT:PSS layer. Then, a
an enhanced open-circuit voltage [26,27]. On the contrary, TiOX film was spin coated for some devices. Finally,
the poor performance of photovoltaic cells incorporating aluminum was thermally evaporated to form the cathode.
graphene electrodes is apparently due to the poor quality A cross-sectional high-resolution transmission electron
of graphene films: high sheet resistances and interfacing microscopy (HRTEM) image of a prepared photovoltaic cell
problems with the active layers. (Fig. 1(b)) clearly shows that the individual layers were
In this paper, we report an application of CVD-synthe- nicely formed with distinctive interfaces; the TiOX film
sized multi-layer graphene (MLG) films incorporated as and MLG film are shown in the upper and lower inset of
transparent and conductive electrodes of organic BHJ pho- Fig. 1(b), respectively.
tovoltaic cells (OPVs). Particularly, the growth temperature
of the graphene films was studied as a control paramter on
the PCE of the graphene-OPVs. Overall, the MLG films 3. Results and discussion
showed good performance as electrodes for OPVs, and
among tested graphene-OPVs the1000 °C-grown MLG 3.1. Characteristics of multi-layer graphene films
films were found to yield the best PCE. Furthermore, when
a thin sol–gel processed titanium sub-oxide (TiOX) layer Before applying the MLG films in photovoltaic cells, we
was inserted in the cell, the PCE was further increased to investigated the properties of these films using various
2.60%. Our results show the control of the graphene film techniques. To determine the morphological features and
quality and the cell structure optimization with a TiOX thicknesses of the MLG films, we used an atomic force
layer can increase the performance of OPVs beyond the microscope (AFM) to image a transferred MLG film on a
proof-of-concept level. 300-nm-thick SiO2 layer on a Si substrate, as shown in
Fig 2(a). The thinnest part measured on our graphene film
is 1.13 nm, as shown in the cross-sectional profile in
2. Experimental Fig. 2(b). This thickness corresponds to the thickness of a
monolayer; due to the chemical contrast between graph-
The device structure of a photovoltaic cell with graph- ene and substrate, the monolayer thickness has been mea-
ene as a transparent and conducting electrode is shown sured as 1 nm by AFM [7,9,28–30]. Fig. 2(c) shows the
in Fig. 1(a). To synthesize graphene films, 300 nm thick TEM images for a graphene film. Our graphene films con-
Ni-deposited substrates were placed into the CVD chamber sisted of mono to multi-layer regions and contained rip-
and heated to 800, 900, or 1000 °C under the flow of a 4% pled regions, as marked by a square in the lower image.
H2 in Ar gas mixture. Then, a graphene film was grown By counting the number and the distance of the bright
by adding CH4 gas to the flow. After growth, the substrate and dark stripes in the rippled region, the number of
TiOX
10 nm
P3HT:PCBM
50 nm
Graphene
PEDOT:PSS
PEDOT:PSS Graphene
Graphene 10 nm
Glass
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the photovoltaic device structure with MLG electrodes and a hole-blocking TiOX layer. (b) TEM cross-sectional image of a
photovoltaic device. The insets show HRTEM images near the TiOX layer (top) and near the MLG films (bottom).
1866 M. Choe et al. / Organic Electronics 11 (2010) 1864–1869
(a) 514 nm
G
900oC
1000oC
1.6
IG / I2D
ID / IG
0.8
1.4
1.2
0.7
800 900 1000 800 900 1000
Temperature (oC) Temperature (oC)
Fig. 3. (a) Raman spectra of MLG films synthesized at different growth temperatures (800, 900, and 1000 °C). (b) Integrated intensity ratios of G peak and
2D peak (IG/I2D), and (c) of D peak and G peak (ID/IG) as a function of growth temperature. These integrated intensity peaks are from the Raman spectra of
graphene films.
(a) 95
o
(b) o
800 oC 1500 800 oC
Transmittance (%)
900 oC
90 1000 C 900 oC
1000 C
1000
Transmittance (%)
93 515 nm
85 90
87 500
80 84
800 900 1000 o
Temperature ( C)
0
500 750 1000 1250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Wavelength (nm) Sheet Resistance (Ω )
Fig. 4. (a) Transmission spectra of MLG films. The inset shows the transmittance of 90.7 ± 1.5, 88.8 ± 2.2, and 86.9 ± 1.2% at 515 nm wavelength, 800, 900,
and 1000 °C, respectively. (b) Mobility versus sheet resistance of MLG films prepared at different growth temperatures (800, 900, and 1000 °C).
(a) (b)
0 60
90
Absorption (%)
J (mA/cm2 )
IPCE (%)
40
-3 60
o
800 oC 20 30
-6 900 oC
1000 C
0 0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 400 600 800
Voltage (V) Wavelength (nm)
Fig. 5. (a) J-V curves of photovoltaic cells with MLG films grown at different growth temperatures under AM 1.5 G irradiation conditions. (b) Incident
photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) and absorption spectra of a photovoltaic device fabricated with a 1000 °C-grown MLG film.
prepared at 1000 °C. Specifically, for the case of the (FF) of 0.35. These values yielded PCE = JSCVOCFF/Pinc (here
1000 °C-graphene OPV, the representative parameters ob- Pinc is the intensity of incident light) of 1.34%. The param-
tained were short-circuit current density (JSC) of 6.25 mA/ eters for the devices with graphene films prepared at 800
cm2, open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.62 V, and fill factor and 900 °C are summarized in Table 1. Fig. 5(b) compares
1868 M. Choe et al. / Organic Electronics 11 (2010) 1864–1869
(a) (b)
ITO 4 filled symbol : pristine
0 with TiOX open symbol : with TiOX
J (mA/cm2 )
1000 oC 3
PCE (%)
-3 with TiOX
2
-6
1
-9
0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 800 oC 900 oC 1000 oC ITO
Voltage (V) Device Types
Fig. 6. (a) J–V curves of photovoltaic devices with 1000 °C-grown MLG electrodes (circles) and with ITO electrodes (diamonds). The curves without the TiOX
layer (filled symbols) are compared to the ones with the TiOX layer (open symbols). (b) The PCEs for graphene-electrode photovoltaic devices in comparison
with those for the ITO-electrode photovoltaic devices with the TiOX layers and without the TiOX layers (pristine). This statistical means and standard
deviations were extracted from Supplementary material. The types of the devices are indicated on the x-axis (800, 900, and 1000 °C: graphene-electrode
devices, ITO: ITO-electrode devices).
M. Choe et al. / Organic Electronics 11 (2010) 1864–1869 1869
one r = 0.45% (standard deviation) from the mean of [4] K.S. Kim, Y. Zhao, H. Jang, S.Y. Lee, J.M. Kim, K.S. Kim, J.-H. Ahn, P.
Kim, J.-Y. Choi, B.H. Hong, Nature 457 (2009) 706.
m = 2.58%. The performance parameters for all types of
[5] V.C. Tung, L.-M. Chen, M.J. Allen, J.K. Wassei, K. Nelson, R.B. Kaner, Y.
photovoltaic devices measured in this study are summa- Yang, Nano Lett. 9 (2009) 1949.
rized in Table 1. Although our results indicate that the effi- [6] H.A. Becerril, J. Mao, Z. Liu, R.M. Stoltenberg, Z. Bao, Y. Chen, ACS
ciency of OPVs can be significantly enhanced by graphene Nano. 2 (2008) 463.
[7] K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S.V.
film quality control and by inserting a TiOX layer, there are Dubonos, I.V. Grigorieva, A.A. Firsov, Science 306 (2004) 666.
rooms for improvements to compete with the efficiency of [8] X. Li, W. Cai, J. An, S. Kim, J. Nah, D. Yang, R. Piner, A. Velamakanni, I.
ITO-electrode OPVs. With more research to further en- Jung, E. Tutuc, S.K. Banerjee, L. Colombo, R.S. Ruoff, Science 324
(2009) 1312.
hance the graphene film quality and to further optimize [9] A. Reina, X. Jia, J. Ho, D. Nezich, H. Son, V. Bulovic, M.S. Dresselhaus, J.
the device structure, graphene films may soon be widely Kong, Nano Lett. 9 (2009) 30.
used as an alternative material to ITO films in organic [10] G. Jo, M. Choe, C.-Y. Cho, J.H. Kim, W. Park, S. Lee, W.-K. Hong, T.-W.
Kim, S.-J. Park, B.H. Hong, Y.H. Kahng, T. Lee, Nanotechnology 21
photovoltaics. (2010) 175201.
[11] X. Wang, L. Zhi, K. Mullen, Nano Lett. 8 (2008) 323.
[12] S.K. Hau, H.-L. Yip, J. Zou, A.K.Y. Jen, Org. Electron. 10 (2009) 1401.
4. Conclusions [13] R.C. Tenent, T.M. Barnes, J.D. Bergeson, A.J. Ferguson, B. To, L.M.
Gedvilas, M.J. Heben, J.L. Blackburn, Adv. Mater. 21 (2009) 3210.
In summary, we reported the application of MLG films [14] Y. Wang, X. Chen, Y. Zhong, F. Zhu, K.P. Loh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 95
(2009) 063302.
grown by chemical vapor deposition to organic photovol- [15] G. Eda, Y.-Y. Lin, S. Miller, C.-W. Chen, W.-F. Su, M. Chhowalla, Appl.
taic cells. The effect of graphene synthesis temperature Phys. Lett. 92 (2008) 233305.
on the performance as anode in OPVs was studied. The [16] J. Wu, H.A. Becerril, Z. Bao, Z. Liu, Y. Chen, P. Peumans, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 92 (2008) 263302.
1000 °C-grown MLG films, that possessed sheet resistances [17] X. Wang, L. Zhi, N. Tsao, Z. Tomovi, J. Li, K. Mullen, Angew. Chem. Int.
of 606 X/h at transmittances of 87%, showed the best Ed. 47 (2008) 2990.
performance as electrodes in OPVs. Furthermore, a cell [18] J. Wu, M. Agrawal, H.A. Becerril, Z. Bao, Z. Liu, Y. Chen, P. Peumans,
ACS Nano. 4 (2010) 43.
structure optimization with an inserted TiOX layer en-
[19] Z. Yin, S. Wu, X. Zhou, X. Huang, Q. Zhang, F. Boey, H. Zhang, Small 6
hanced the observed power conversion efficiency up to (2010) 307.
2.58 ± 0.45%. Our demonstration of efficiency improve- [20] P. Blake, P.D. Brimicombe, R.R. Nair, T.J. Booth, D. Jiang, F. Schedin,
L.A. Ponomarenko, S.V. Morozov, H.F. Gleeson, E.W. Hill, A.K. Geim,
ments in graphene-adopted photovoltaic cells may foster
K.S. Novoselov, Nano Lett. 8 (2008) 1704.
the application of fast-progressing graphene technology [21] N. Yang, J. Zhai, D. Wang, Y. Chen, L. Jiang, ACS Nano. 4 (2010) 887.
into the practical realm of organic photovoltaic cells. [22] S. Sun, L. Gao, Y. Liu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 (2010) 083113.
[23] S. Bae, H. Kim, Y. Lee, X. Xu, J.-S. Park, Y. Zheng, J. Balakrishnan, T. Lei,
H.R. Kim, Y.I. Song, Y.-J. Kim, K.S. Kim, B. Özyilmaz, J.-H. Ahn, B.H.
Acknowledgements Hong, S. Iijima, Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 (2010) 574.
[24] S.H. Park, A. Roy, S. Beaupre, S. Cho, N. Coates, J.S. Moon, D. Moses, M.
Leclerc, K. Lee, A.J. Heeger, Nat. Photonics 3 (2009) 297.
This work was supported by the National Research Lab- [25] J.Y. Kim, K. Lee, N.E. Coates, D. Moses, T.-Q. Nguyen, M. Dante, A.J.
oratory Program, the National Core Research Center grant, Heeger, Science 317 (2007) 222.
the World Class University program, and the National [26] J. Hou, H.-Y. Chen, S. Zhang, R.I. Chen, Y. Yang, Y. Wu, G. Li, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 15586.
Research Foundation of Korea (Grant No. 20090093869)
[27] H.-Y. Chen, J. Hou, S. Zhang, Y. Liang, G. Yang, Y. Yang, L. Yu, Y. Wu, G.
from the Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Tech- Li, Nat. Photonics 3 (2009) 649.
nology, and the Program for Integrated Molecular System [28] C. Gomez-Navarro, R.T. Weitz, A.M. Bittner, M. Scolari, A. Mews, M.
Burghard, K. Kern, Nano Lett. 7 (2007) 3499.
at GIST. The authors thank Yun Chang Park at the National
[29] S. Gilje, S. Han, M. Wang, K.L. Wang, R.B. Kaner, Nano Lett. 7 (2007)
Nanofab Center for his comments and assistance in analyz- 3394.
ing and obtaining the TEM images. [30] M.J. Allen, V.C. Tung, L. Gomez, Z. Xu, L.-M. Chen, K.S. Nelson, C. Zhou,
R.B. Kaner, Y. Yang, Adv. Mater. 21 (2009) 2098.
[31] X. Wang, H. You, F. Liu, M. Li, L. Wan, S. Li, Q. Li, Y. Xu, R. Tian, Z. Yu,
Appendix A. Supplementary material D. Xiang, J. Cheng, Chem. Vap. Dep. 15 (2009) 53.
[32] Y.y. Wang, Z.h. Ni, T. Yu, Z.X. Shen, H.m. Wang, Y.h. Wu, W. Chen,
A.T.S. Wee, J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (2008) 10637.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be [33] A.C. Ferrari, Solid State Commun. 143 (2007) 47.
found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.orgel.2010. [34] L.G. Cancado, K. Takai, T. Enoki, M. Endo, Y.A. Kim, H. Mizusaki, A.
08.018. Jorio, L.N. Coelho, R. Magalhaes-Paniago, M.A. Pimenta, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 88 (2006) 163106.
[35] M.J. Matthews, M.A. Pimenta, G. Dresselhaus, M.S. Dresselhaus, M.
References Endo, Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) R6585.
[36] J.Y. Kim, S.H. Kim, H.-H. Lee, K. Lee, W. Ma, X. Gong, A.J. Heeger, Adv.
Mater. 18 (2006) 572.
[1] K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M.I. Katsnelson, I.V.
[37] A. Roy, S.H. Park, S. Cowan, M.H. Tong, S. Cho, K. Lee, A.J. Heeger,
Grigorieva, S.V. Dubonos, A.A. Firsov, Nature 438 (2005) 197.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 (2009) 013302.
[2] X. Du, I. Skachko, A. Barker, E.Y. Andrei, Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 (2008)
[38] S. Cho, J. Yuen, J.Y. Kim, K. Lee, A.J. Heeger, S. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92
491.
(2008) 063505.
[3] D.V. Kosynkin, A.L. Higginbotham, A. Sinitskii, J.R. Lomeda, A. Dimiev,
[39] S. Cho, J.H. Seo, K. Lee, A.J. Heeger, Adv. Funct. Mater. 19 (2009) 1459.
B.K. Price, J.M. Tour, Nature 458 (2009) 872.