SS Simulation of Ethane Recovery
SS Simulation of Ethane Recovery
Abstract—The production and consumption of natural gas is on For Ethane recovery, the key components in separation
the rise throughout the world as a result of its wide availability, ease process are methane and ethane but for propane recovery, they
of transportation, use and clean-burning characteristics. The chief use are ethane and propane, thus primary need is de-methanizer
of ethane is in the chemical industry in the production of Ethene
and de-ethanizer respectively. Relative volatility (αij) of the
(ethylene) by steam cracking. In this simulation, obtained ethane
recovery percent based on Gas sub-cooled process (GSP) is 99.9 by ethane recovery is over twice that of the propane recovery
mole that is included 32.1% by using de-methanizer column and system which leads de-methanizer should be smaller than
67.8% by de-ethanizer tower. The outstanding feature of this process de-ethanizer in terms of equilibrium stages [1].
Open Science Index, Chemical and Molecular Engineering Vol:5, No:3, 2011 waset.org/Publication/12506
is the novel split-vapor concept that employs to generate reflux for There are various refrigeration strategies in an Ethane
de-methanizer column. Remain amount of ethane in export gas cause recovery unit, the most economical process presently in wide
rise in gross heating value up to 36.66 MJ/Nm3 in order to use in
use employs turbo-expansion, and can recover over 90% of
industrial and household consumptions.
the ethane in natural gas by using de-methanizer and
Keywords—Ethane recovery, Hydrocarbon dew point, de-ethanizer columns. The processing costs for gas processor
Simulation, Water dew point can generally be divided into two parts: liquid recovery and
contaminant removal. In this process, chilled gas expands
I. INTRODUCTION through a turbine so that at low temperatures, gaseous
methane can be separated from the liquefied ethane and
A FTER methane, ethane is the second-largest component
of natural gas. Natural gas from different gas fields
varies in ethane content from less than 1% to over 6% by
heavier hydrocarbons (C2+) by distillation. Further distillation
then separates ethane from the propane and heavier
volume. Prior to the 1960s, ethane and larger molecules were hydrocarbons (C3+).
typically not separated from the methane component of Turbo-expander plants designed for high ethane recovery
natural gas, but simply burnt along with the methane as a fuel. will also recover a significant quantity of the carbon dioxide
Today, ethane is an important petrochemical feedstock, and it contained in the feed gas [2]. With typical natural gas liquid
is separated from the other components of natural gas in most product specification, this usually means treating either the
well-developed gas fields. Ethane can also be separated from feed gas or the NGL product to remove at least a portion of
petroleum gas, a mixture of gaseous hydrocarbons that arises carbon dioxide. In a liquid recovery section, there are both
as a byproduct of petroleum refining. Ethane is most operating cost and operating flexibility issues that directly
efficiently separated from methane by liquefying it at affect processing cost.
cryogenic temperatures. Recent paper will study an Iranian Ethane recovery unit as
Gas Sub-cooled Process (GSP) [3] in one of gas refineries in
South Pars Gas field which receives 2000 MMSCFD sour gas
(each train 500MMSCFD) as feed so that export (sales) gas
specification e.g. composition, hydrocarbon dew point, higher
heating value, Wobbe index, Hydrate formation condition and
also Ethane specification e.g. composition, CO2 content, CO2
freeze temperature and total sulfur will be investigated and
compared with specified targets after simulation by Aspen
Hysys software (ver.2006) based on Peng-Robinson equation
of state.
Arash Esmaeili is with Islamic Azad University, Tehran-South Branch, II. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Chemical Engineering Department, Tehran, Iran (Phone: 98-912-5130090,
e-mail: arash.esmaeili2010@gmail.com) In this process, dry sweet feed (27.7ºC, 60.5 barg) after
Omid Ghabouli is with Catalysis Research and Technology Center, sweetening by amine and dehydration by molecular sieves
Research Institute of Oil Industry, Tehran, Iran (Phone: 98-936-2055883, with standard gas flow 478.5 MMSCFD is primarily cooled
e-mail: omid.ghabooli@yahoo.com)
by cold box up to -35ºC while a portion of feed gas is
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 5(3) 2011 209 ISNI:0000000091950263
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Chemical and Molecular Engineering
Vol:5, No:3, 2011
condensed which is included 4% by mole and separated by after separation of some liquid that express phase variations
expander suction drum and is entered to tower on 21st tray, based on composition changes. Comparison of these curves
remain gas from top of drum is divided to two parts so that indicates two phase area will be smaller and temperature,
71% mole flows to expander and rest of it after cooling by pressure zones are decreased after separation of liquid.
cold box and pressure drop by control valve decreases to -95ºC
that is introduced to de-methanizer (31 stages) column on top
as reflux stream. To recover ethane and heavier hydrocarbon,
energy must be consumed that is supplied by either expansion
or refrigeration or a combination of both. Expansion by using
an expander causes increased investment cost while cooling
by refrigeration raises both investment and operation costs
while in order to recover more ethane, the amount of external
power supplied to the gas must increase. Main stream is
expanded within expander to -67ºC and 29.1 barg and is
entered to tower as major feed on 23rd tray where column
diameter changes; these two streams are as hot streams inside
the cold box while cold box has five cold streams that are
followed as: Fig. 1 Phase envelope of inlet feed to ethane recovery unit
(feed in the right side of dew point curve)
Open Science Index, Chemical and Molecular Engineering Vol:5, No:3, 2011 waset.org/Publication/12506
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 5(3) 2011 210 ISNI:0000000091950263
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Chemical and Molecular Engineering
Vol:5, No:3, 2011
unit after passing from Ethane heater (40ºC, 28.5barg) and is TABLE I
COMPARISON OF EXPORT GAS AND ETHANE PRODUCT SPECIFICATION WITH
treated to remove CO2 in order to rise heating value by DEA
SIMULATED VALUES
solution and being dried with molecular sieve before export to
petrochemical plants. CO2 is a particularly troublesome Export gas specification Ethane gas specification
contaminant often found in natural gas, including many of the Specified Simulated Specified Simulated
newly discovered oil and natural gas reservoirs. Components
value values value values
Max. 1%
Butane 42 PPm mol.
mol. Max. 3PPm
Nil
Max. 0.5% < 0.02 % mol.
C5+
mol. mol.
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 5(3) 2011 211 ISNI:0000000091950263
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Chemical and Molecular Engineering
Vol:5, No:3, 2011
HHV (1) Fig.5 shows boiling point curves of simulated export gas
WI =
Sp.Gr product while Fig.6 indicates boiling point curve of ethane
stream accordance to different ASTM standards. ASTM D86
Table2 indicates heating values of each of Export gas and and D1160 distillations employ batch fractionation apparatus
Ethane products. but they are conducted using non-refluxed Engler flasks.
Although most gas transportation companies and gas ASTM D86 is used for light to medium petroleum fluids e.g.
consumers will accept Carbon dioxide concentration in less Methane and Ethane so ASTM D1160 is carried out at both
than one percent for natural gas streams, but many NGL vacuum and atmospheric conditions for heavier products.
recovery processes and petrochemical plants which receive
Ethane as feedstock require removal of CO2 to avoid troubles.
Since CO2 removal equipment can add significantly to both
the investment and operating costs of the contaminant removal
section of the gas processing facility, there is considerable
advantage to reduce the CO2 content in product leaving the
liquids recovery section of an NGL recovery facility. Carbon
dioxide freezing was estimated by calculating CO2 freezing
temperature approach ( ΔTCO 2 ). This temperature is calculated
based on composition and pressure. Negative value of
ΔTCO 2 indicates a CO2 freezing problem most likely will
occur.
Fig. 5 Boiling point curves of produced export gas based on ASTM
standards
ΔTCO 2 = Toper . − TCO 2 freeze (2)
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 5(3) 2011 212 ISNI:0000000091950263
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Chemical and Molecular Engineering
Vol:5, No:3, 2011
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors thank the gas refinery laboratory staff for
giving required data to investigate simulation results.
REFERENCES
[1] K.A. Pennybaker, S.E. Wolverton, "A comparative study of ethane
recovery processes", River city Engineering, Inc., Kansas.
[2] H.M. Hudson, J.D. Wilkinson, "Reducing treating requirements for
cryogenic NGL recovery plants", 80th annual convention of the Gas
processors association, Texas, USA, 2001.
[3] H.M. Hudson, J.D. Wilkinson, "Next generation processes for
NGL/LPG recovery", 77th annual convention the Gas processors
association, Texas, USA, 1998.
[4] D.Y. Peng, D.B. Robinson, A new two-constant equation of state, Ind.
Eng. Chem. Fundam. 15, 59-64, 1976.
[5] A. Esmaeili, Experimental study and steady state simulation of a NGL
fractionation unit in order to investigate qualified specification, 19th
International Congress of Chemical and Process Engineering
(Chisa2010), Prague, Czech Republic, 2010.
[6] A. Esmaeili, Experimental study and steady state simulation of a LPG
production unit to investigate specified properties, 13th Asian Pacific
confederation of chemical engineering congress, Taipei, Taiwan, 2010.
Open Science Index, Chemical and Molecular Engineering Vol:5, No:3, 2011 waset.org/Publication/12506
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 5(3) 2011 213 ISNI:0000000091950263