Portfolio Analysis Theory
Portfolio Analysis Theory
Portfolio Analysis Theory
This chapter deals with the risks and returns on investments in securities.
Portfolio Management activities include:
Selection of securities for investment;
Construction of possible portfolios;
Deciding the weights / proportions of different securities in the
portfolio and arriving at an Optimal Portfolio for the concerned
investor.
The main objective of a rational investor is to identify the Efficient Portfolios
out of the different Feasible Portfolios and to zero in on the Optimal Portfolio
suiting his risk appetite. An Efficient Portfolio has the highest return
among all Feasible Portfolios having identical Risk and has the
lowest Risk among all Feasible Portfolios having identical Return.
The other Objectives of Portfolio management are:
a. Security/Safety of Principal;
b. Stability of Income;
c. Capital Appreciation;
d. Marketability & Liquidity;
e. Minimisation of risk;
f. Diversification;
g. Suitable tax considerations.
All investments are to be looked in the above areas before taking a call on
investment or continuing with the amount invested.
Investment management is a complex task, and requires special knowledge
and skills to deal with the identification and form of Portfolio.
Phases of portfolio Management: The various phases are:
a. Security Analysis: Securities are analysed under Fundamental
Analysis (EPS of the Co., Dividend Payout ratio, Competition faced by
the company, market share etc.) & Technical Analysis (Trends in share
price movements etc.) As per Efficient Market Hypothesis, share price
movements are random and not systematic. Consequently, neither
fundamental analysis nor technical analysis is of value or of use in
generating trading gains on a sustained basis.
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 1 of 31
b. Portfolio analysis: After identifying the securities in which
investments are to be made, next comes the formation of Portfolio.
Portfolio is a combination of securities with different proportions of
investments. Different feasible portfolios are constructed and the
return and risk of each portfolio is ascertained. As per the risk
appetite of the investor, and his preferences, appropriate portfolio is
identified for investment.
c. Portfolio Revision: Economy and financial markets are dynamic in
nature, changes take place in these variables almost on a daily basis
and securities which were once attractive may cease to be so and vice
versa with the passage of time. Having made investments as per the
risk appetite of investors, the portfolio is watched continuously and
suitable changes to it are made as per changing market conditions and
risk appetite of the investor.
d. Portfolio Evaluation: Performance of the portfolio over a selected
period of time in terms of return and risk is ascertained. It involves
quantitative measurement of actual return realized and the risk borne
by the portfolio over the period of investment. The objective of
constructing a portfolio and revising it periodically is to maintain its
optimal risk return characteristics. Various types of measures of
performance evaluation have been developed for use by investors and
portfolio managers.
Risk Analysis: The risk in an investment is the variation in its returns. This
variation in returns is caused by a number of factors. The factors which
produce variations in the returns from an investment are called the elements
of risk which can be depicted by the following figure:
Elements
of Risk
Systematic Unsystematic
Risk Risk
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 4 of 31
Xi = Possible returns on security i ; X = Expected Value of security /
Portfolio;
P(Xi) = Probability.
Standard Deviation is the Square Root of Variance.
Variance and Standard Deviation indicate the total risk associated with
security, i.e. Systematic risk + Unsystematic risk.
A rational risk-averse investor views the variance (or standard deviation) of
her portfolio‟s return as the proper risk of her portfolio. If the investor holds
only one security (or very few securities), the variance of that security‟s
return becomes the variance of the portfolio‟s return. Hence, the variance of
the security‟s return is the security‟s proper measure of risk.
An investor with diversified portfolio measures the beta of the security as a
proper measure of risk for the security since for him unsystematic risk is
minimised because of diversification. An investor who is evaluating the
systematic element of risk, that is, extent of deviation of returns vis a vis
the market, therefore considers beta as a proper measure of risk.
When risk is separated into systematic and unsystematic parts, the market
generally does not reward for diversifiable risk (unsystematic risk) since the
investor himself is expected to diversify the risk. However, if the investor
does not diversify he cannot be considered to be an efficient investor. The
market, therefore, rewards an investor only for the non-diversifiable
(systematic) risk. Hence, the investor needs to know how much non-
diversifiable risk he is taking. Non diversifiable risk is measured in terms of
beta.
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 5 of 31
Further, an investor with varied diversified portfolio also considers variance
and standard deviation of the security as measure of the risk for the security
so far it impacts the variance and standard deviation of the portfolio. He will
not be per se interested in the variance or standard deviation of each
security, rather he is interested in their impact on the total portfolio.
Unsystematic risk is internal risk and is associated with the company. This
can be minimised by having another security in the portfolio with opposite
correlation and this process is known as diversification. A portfolio with
around 25 securities in it will have minimum unsystematic risk due to
diversification.
Measurement of Systematic Risk: Systematic risk relates to external
environment and is uncontrollable. Different Securities returns are affected
by different degrees due to changes in economy like inflation, interest rate,
etc. The average effect of a change in the economy can be represented by
the change in the stock market index. The systematic risk of a security can
be measured by relating that security‟s variability vis-à-vis variability in the
stock market index. A higher variability would indicate higher systematic risk
and vice versa.
The systematic risk of a security is measured by a statistical measure called
Beta. Input data required for the calculation of beta of any security are the
historical data of returns of the individual security and corresponding return
of a representative market return (stock market index). There are two
statistical methods i.e. correlation method and the regression method,
which can be used for the calculation of Beta.
Correlation Method: Formula used for calculation of Beta is:
𝑪𝒐𝒗.𝒊𝒎 𝒓𝒊𝒎 𝒔𝒅𝒊 𝒔𝒅𝒎 𝒓𝒊𝒎 𝒔𝒅𝒊 𝒓𝒑𝒎 𝒔𝒅𝒑
𝜷= = = = Where,
𝒔𝒅𝟐 𝒎 𝑺𝒅𝟐 𝒎 𝑺𝒅𝒎 𝑺𝒅𝒎
n = number of items;
X = Independent variable (market);
Y = Dependent variable (security);
XY = product of dependent and independent variable;
Alternative Formula:
𝑿𝒀−𝒏 𝑿͞ 𝒀͞ 𝑿𝒀−( 𝑿) 𝒀͞
𝜷= =
𝑿𝟐 − 𝒏 𝑿͞𝟐 𝑿𝟐 − ( 𝑿) 𝑿͞
X͞ & Y‾ are respective arithmetic means and rest of Notations have same
meaning as in above earlier formula.
To calculate return of individual security, following CAPM formula is used:
Ra = 𝜶 + 𝜷𝑹𝒎 where,
Ra = Return of individual security,
Rm = Return on market index or Risk Premium
𝛼 = Return of the security when market is stationary
𝜷 = Change in return of individual security for unit change in return of
market index.
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 8 of 31
xi = proportion of funds invested in each security;
ri = expected return on securities; and
n = number of securities.
Covariance (a statistical measure) between two securities or two portfolios
or a security and a portfolio indicates how the rates of return for the two
concerned entities behave relative to each other. Covariance is calculated by
the formula;
𝑹𝑨 −𝑹̅𝑨 (𝑹𝑩 −𝑹̅𝑩 )
CovAB = 𝑵
where
RA = Return on security A;
R̅ A = Expected or mean return of Security A;
RB = Return on security B;
R̅ B = Expected or mean return of Security B.
Covariance of 2 securities is +ve if the returns consistently move in same
direction.
Covariance of 2 securities is -ve if the returns consistently move in opposite
direction.
Covariance of 2 securities is zero, if their returns are independent of each
other.
Coefficient of correlation is expressed by the formula:
𝑪𝒐𝒗𝑨𝑩
rAB = 𝑺𝒅𝑨 𝑺𝒅𝑩
where
Sdp2 = [(
𝟐
𝒏 𝟐
𝒊=𝟏 𝑿𝒊 𝜷𝒊 ) 𝑺𝒅𝒎 ] +[ 𝒏 𝟐 𝟐
𝒊=𝟏 𝑿𝒊 𝑼𝑺𝑹 ] Where,
Sdp2 = Variance of portfolio;
Xi = Proportion of the Stock in portfolio;
𝛽𝑖 = Beta of the stock i in portfolio;
Sdm2 = Variance of the index;
USR = Unsystematic Risk
First component is weighted average of systematic risk and second
component is weighted average of unsystematic risk and sum of these is
total risk.
Optimum proportion of investment in case of 2 securities: Formula for
Optimum proportion of investment in case of 2 securities i & j is calculated
by the formula:
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 11 of 31
unsystematic risk. By combining securities into a portfolio the unsystematic
risk specific to different securities is cancelled out. Consequently, the risk of
the portfolio as a whole is reduced as the size of the portfolio increases.
Ultimately when the size of the portfolio reaches a certain limit, it will
contain only the systematic risk of securities included in the portfolio. The
systematic risk, however, cannot be eliminated. Thus, a fairly large portfolio
has only systematic risk and has relatively little unsystematic risk. That is
why there is no gain in adding securities to a portfolio beyond a certain
portfolio size.
Calculation of Risk of Portfolio with more than two securities: The
portfolio variance and standard deviation depend on the proportion of
investment in each security as also the variance and covariance of each
security included in the portfolio. The formula for portfolio variance of a
portfolio with more than two securities is as follows:
Sdp2 = 𝒏
𝒊=𝟏
𝒏
𝒊=𝟏 𝑿𝒊 𝑿𝒋 𝑪𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒋 = 𝒏
𝒊=𝟏
𝒏
𝒊=𝟏 𝑿𝒊 𝑿𝒋 𝒓𝒊𝒋 𝑺𝒅𝒊 𝑺𝒅𝒋 where,
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 13 of 31
He says that all investments are to be plotted on a risk return graph and
Efficient Frontier is to be marked containing all efficient portfolios. the
shaded portion represents all feasible solutions. An efficient portfolio has the
highest return among all portfolios with identical risk and the lowest risk
among all portfolios with identical return. In the above diagram, P Y R W
are on efficient frontier.
Lines c1, c2, and c3 are indifference curves for different customers with
regard to risks and associated returns of different portfolios. The investor
has to select a portfolio from the set of efficient portfolios lying on the
efficient frontier. This will depend upon his risk-return appetite. As different
investors have different preferences, the optimal portfolio of securities will
vary from one investor to another. Optimal portfolio to an investor will be
the point where the indifference curve meets the efficient frontier. For c3
customer, optimal portfolio will be at point R. At Point w, returns and risk
are at peak. Since this is not customer preference line, it is ignored.
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 15 of 31
CAPM has also some limitations:
a. Reliability of Beta: Statistically reliable Beta might not exist for
shares of many firms. It may not be possible to determine the cost of
equity of all firms using CAPM. All shortcomings that apply to Beta
value apply to CAPM too.
b. Other Risks: It emphasises only systematic risk while unsystematic
risks are also important to share holders who do not possess a
diversified portfolio.
c. Information Available: It is extremely difficult to obtain important
information on risk-free interest rate and expected return on market
portfolio as there are multiple risk-free rates for one while for another,
markets being volatile it varies over time period.
Under Valued and Over Valued Stocks:
The CAPM model can be used to buy, sell or hold stocks. CAPM provides the
required rate of return on a stock after considering the risk involved in an
investment. Based on current market price one can identify as to what would
be the expected return over a period of time. By comparing the required
return with the expected return the following investment decisions can be
made: If:
On Return Basis:
Expected Return < CAPM Return; Sell, since stock is overvalued.
Expected Return > CAPM Return; Buy, since stock is undervalued
Expected Return = CAPM Return; Hold.
On Price Basis:
Actual Market Price < CAPM price, stock is undervalued; so Buy
Actual market Price > CAPM price, stock is overvalued; so, sell.
Actual market Price = CAPM price, stock is correctly valued.;
Point of indifference.
Characteristic Line: Characteristic line represents the relationship
between the returns of two securities or a security and market return over a
period of time. The differences between Security Market Line and
Characteristic Line are as below:
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 16 of 31
Sl. # Aspect Security Market Line Characteristic Line
Represents relationship Represents the relationship
between return and risk between the returns of two
1 Scheme measured in terms of securities or a security and
systematic risk of a security market return over a period
or portfolio. of time.
Security Market Line is a Characteristic Line is a Time
2 Nature of Graph
Cross Sectional Graph. Series Graph.
Beta Vs. Expected Return Security Returns Vs. Index
3 Comparison
are Plotted. Returns are Plotted.
Used to estimate the Used to estimate Beta and
expected return of a security also to determine how a
4 Utility
vis-a-vis its Beta. security return correlates to
a market index return.
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 17 of 31
Sharpe Index Model: This model assumes that co-movement between
stocks is due to change or movement in the market index. Casual
observation of the stock prices over a period of time reveals that most of the
stock prices move with the market index. As per this model, expected
return on security i, is calculated by the formula;
R i = α i + β i R m + ∈i where,
Ri = expected return on security i
αi = intercept of the straight line or alpha co-efficient
βi = slope of straight line or beta co-efficient
Rm = the rate of return on market index
€i = error term.
Alpha of a stock can be found by the above formula or alternatively by fitting
a straight line with coordinates (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) where x1, x2 and y1, y2
are the expected returns of the market and the security in any 2 periods.
Alpha is the value of intercept on Y Axis. Equation of the line in 2 point form
is given by the formula:
𝐲𝟐 − 𝐲𝟏
𝐲 − 𝐲𝟏 = (𝐱 − 𝐱𝟏 )
𝐱𝟐 − 𝐱 𝟏
According to Sharpe, the return of stock can be divided into 2 components:
Return due to market changes (systematic risk)and
Return independent of market changes (unsystematic risk).
Beta indicates the sensitiveness of the stock returns to changes in the
market return.
The Variance of the security has 2 components:
Systematic or market risk, and
Unsystematic or unique risk.
So, the variance explained by the market index (i.e. Beta) is called
systematic risk and the variance not explained by market index is
unsystematic risk.
Total variance (Sdi2) = Systematic risk (ßi2 X Sdm2) + Unsystematic risk
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 18 of 31
systematic risk = ßi2 X Variance of market index = ßi2 X Sdm2
Unsystematic risk = Total Variance – systematic risk
i.e. Unsystematic risk = Sdi2 - ßi2 X Sdm2
(Sdm = Standard deviation of Market index; ßi = Beta of security i; Sdi =
Standard deviation of security i)
When USR is given, Portfolio Variance is calculated by the formula:
Sdp2 = [(
𝟐
𝒏 𝟐
𝒊=𝟏 𝑿𝒊 𝜷𝒊 ) 𝑺𝒅𝒎 ] +[ 𝒏 𝟐 𝟐
𝒊=𝟏 𝑿𝒊 𝑼𝑺𝑹 ] Where,
Sdp2 = Variance of portfolio;
Xi = Proportion of the Stock in portfolio;
𝛽𝑖 = Beta of the stock i in portfolio;
Sdm2 = Variance of the index;
USR = Unsystematic Risk
First component is weighted average of systematic risk and second
component is weighted average of unsystematic risk and sum of these is
total risk.
Coefficient of Determination (r2): Coefficient of determination (r2) gives
the percentage of variation in the security‟s return that is explained by the
variation of the market index return
Systematic and Unsystematic risk can also be found by the formulas:
Systematic risk (β) = variance of security X r2 = Sdi2 X r2
Unsystematic risk = variance of security (1 – r2) = Sdi2 (1 – r2)
r2 = Coefficient of Determination.
Sharpe and Treynor ratios: These two ratios measure the Risk Premium
per unit of Risk for a security or a portfolio of securities and provide the tools
for comparing the performance of diverse securities and portfolios.
Sharpe Ratio = (Ri – Rf)/Sdi and
Treynor Ratio = (Ri – Rf)/ βi Where,
Ri = Expected return on stock i
Rf = Return on a risk less asset
Sdi = Standard Deviation of the rates of return for the ith Security
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 19 of 31
βi = Expected change in the rate of return on stock i associated with one
unit change in the market return
Higher the Risk Premium generated by a security or portfolio per unit of risk,
the better and these ratios provide a useful tool for comparing securities and
portfolios with diverse risk return profiles. While the Sharpe Ratio uses the
standard deviation (i.e. total risk) as the measure of risk, the Treynor Ratio
uses the beta (i.e. systematic risk) as the measure of risk.
Sharpe’s Optimal Portfolio: The steps for finding out the stocks to be
included in the optimal portfolio are as below:
a. Find out the “excess return to beta” ratio for each stock under
consideration.
b. Rank them from the highest to the lowest.
c. Calculate Ci for all the stocks/portfolios according to the ranked order
using the following formula:
(𝐑 𝐢 −𝐑𝐟 )𝛃𝐢
𝐒𝐝𝟐𝐦 𝐧
𝐢=𝟏 𝟐
𝐔𝐒𝐑
Ci = Where,
𝐧 𝛃𝟐𝐢
𝟏+𝐒𝐝𝟐𝐦 𝐢=𝟏𝐔𝐒𝐑𝟐
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 20 of 31
𝒁𝒊
% to be invested = 𝒏 𝒁 Where,
𝒊=𝟏 𝒊
𝜷𝒊 𝑹𝒊 −𝑹𝒇
Zi = ( − 𝑪∗ )
𝑼𝑺𝑹𝟐 𝜷𝒊
a. Aggressive Growth
b. Distressed Securities
c. Emerging Markets
d. Funds of Hedge Funds: : Mix and match hedge funds and other pooled
investment vehicles
e. Income
f. Macro: Participates in all major markets - equities, bonds, currencies
and commodities - though not always at the same time.
g. Market Neutral: Off sets positions.
h. Market Timing
i. Opportunistic
j. Multi Strategy
k. Short Selling
l. Special Situations
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 23 of 31
m. Value: Invests in securities perceived to be selling at deep
discounts to their intrinsic or potential worth.
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 25 of 31
Inability of institutional portfolio managers to achieve superior investment
performance implies that they lack competence in an efficient market. It is
not possible to achieve superior investment performance since all portfolio
managers do their job well in a competitive setting.
Three forms of Efficient Market Hypothesis: The Efficient Market Theory
lays stress on the speed of information that affects the prices of securities.
As per research studies, it was observed that if information is slowly
incorporated in the price, it provides an opportunity to earn excess profit.
However, once the information is incorporated then investor cannot earn this
excess profit. There are 3 levels of market efficiency:
a. Weak form efficiency: Prices reflect all information found in the
record of past prices and volumes.
b. Semi – Strong efficiency: Prices reflect not only all information
found in the records of past prices and volumes but also all other
publicly available information.
c. Strong form efficiency: Prices reflect all available information public
as well as private.
Proof of weak form of efficiency: According to the Weak form Efficient
Market Theory current price of a stock reflects all information found in the
record of past prices and volumes. This means that there is relationship
between the past and future price movements. This is affirmed through 3
tests:
a. Serial Correlation Test: In this test, price changes in one period are
correlated with price changes in another period. Price changes are
considered to be serially independent. Serial correlation studies
employing different stocks, at different time lags and different time
periods have been conducted to detect serial correlation but no
significant serial correlation could be discovered. These studies were
carried on short term trends viz. daily, weekly, fortnightly and monthly
and not in long term trends in stock prices as in such cases, Stock
prices tend to move upwards.
b. Run Test: Given a series of stock price changes each price change is
designated + if it represents an increase and – if it represents a
decrease. The resulting series may be -, +,+ ,+, - , -, - , +, +.
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 26 of 31
A run occurs when there is no difference between the sign of two
changes. When the sign of change differs, the run ends and new run
begins.
Price Incr. / Decr. +,+,+,-,-,+,-,+,-,-,+,+,+,-,+,+,+,+
Run 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
To test a series of price change for independence, the number of runs
in that series is compared with a number of runs in a purely random
series of the same size to determine whether it is statistically different.
The results of these studies strongly support the Random Walk Model.
Calculation: To test efficiency, following procedure is adopted:
First, number of runs r is calculated.
Secondly, N+ & N- are calculated. These are the number of +ve & -
ve signs in the sample.
Thirdly, N is calculated. N = N+ + N- = Total observations – 1
Fourthly, As per Null hypothesis, the number of runs in a sequence of
N elements as random variable whose conditional distribution is given
by observations of N+ and N- is approximately normal with Mean µ
which is calculated as
𝟐 𝑵+𝑵−
µ= + 𝟏
𝑵
Fifthly, Standard deviation, 𝜎 is calculated by the formula:
µ − 𝟏 (µ − 𝟐)
𝝈=
𝑵−𝟏
Sixthly, If the sample size is N, then it will have (N - 1) degrees of
freedom. For this particular degrees of freedom, and the given level of
significance, using the value ‘t’ from t-table, Upper and Lower limits
are found by the formula:
Upper / Lower Limit = µ ± t * 𝝈
Lastly, If the value of r falls within the upper and lower limits, it is
called weak form of efficiency, and if it falls outside the limits, it is
called strong form of efficiency.
c. Filter Test: Under this test, if the price of a stock increases by at
least N% buy and hold it until its price decreases by at least N% from
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 27 of 31
a subsequent high. When the price decreases at least N% or more, sell
it. If the behaviour of stock price changes is random, filter rules should
not be applied and in such case a buy and hold strategy is to be
adopted. Studies suggest that filter rules do not outperform a single
buy and hold strategy particularly after considering commission on
transaction.
Proof of Semi Strong Efficiency: According to Semi-strong form efficient
market theory stock prices adjust rapidly to all publicly available
information. By using publicly available information, investors will not be
able to earn above normal rates of return after considering the risk factor.
To test semi-strong form efficient market theory, a number of studies were
conducted to answer the following queries:
Whether it is possible to earn the above normal rate of return after
adjustment for risk, using only publicly available information? and
How rapidly prices adjust to public announcement with regard to
earnings, dividends, mergers, acquisitions, stock splits?
Several studies have been made on the above issues and it is observed that,
the prices of stocks moved up significantly before announcements than after
announcements. The studies have also brought out following observations:
Stock price adjust gradually not rapidly to announcements of
unanticipated changes in quarterly earnings.
Small firms‟ portfolio seemed to outperform large firms‟ portfolio.
Monday‟s return is lower than return for the other days of the week.
Thus it is affirmed that random movement of stock prices holds good.
Proof of Strong Efficiency: According to Strong form efficient market
theory stock prices adjust rapidly to all publicly and privately available
information.
To test this theory, the researchers analysed returns earned by certain
groups viz. Corporate insiders, specialists on stock exchanges, mutual fund
managers who have access to internal information (not publicly available),
or posses greater resource or ability to intensively analyse information in the
public domain. They suggested that corporate insiders (having access to
internal information) and stock exchange specialists (having monopolistic
exposure) earn superior rate of return after adjustment of risk.
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 28 of 31
Mutual Fund managers do not on an average earn a superior rate of return.
No scientific evidence has been formulated to indicate that investment
performance of professionally managed portfolios as a group is better than
that of randomly selected portfolios.
This indicates that persons who are privy to certain information earn more
than others who are not privy to such information.
Challenges of Efficient Market Theory: Information is not freely available
and even if available, the authenticity cannot always be vouched. At times
corporates deliberately allow wrong information to get propagated. Other
challenges are:
a. Limited information processing capabilities: Human information
processing capabilities are sharply limited. Every human organism
lives in an environment which generates millions of new bits of
information every second but the bottle necks of the perceptual
apparatus does not admit more than thousand bits per second or
possibly much less.
Further, under conditions of anxiety and uncertainty, with a vast
interacting information grid, the market can become a giant.
b. Irrational Behaviour: It is generally believed that investors‟
rationality will ensure a close correspondence between market prices
and intrinsic values. But in practice this is not true. All sorts of
considerations enter into the market valuation which is in no way
relevant to the prospective yield. This was confirmed by L. C. Gupta
who found that the market evaluation processes work haphazardly
almost like a blind man firing a gun. The market seems to function
largely on hit or miss tactics rather than on the basis of informed
beliefs about the long term prospects of individual enterprises.
c. Monopolistic Influence: A market is regarded as highly competitive.
No single buyer or seller is supposed to have undue influence over
prices. In practice, powerful institutions and big operators wield great
influence over the market. The monopolistic power enjoyed by them
diminishes the competitiveness of the market. Due to monopolistic
powers, prices are rigged for gains.
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 29 of 31
Statutory Warning: Investing all Liquid
assets, and / or converting all fixed assets
into liquid assets and investing in Stock
Market will be injurious to your wealth.
Questions:
a. Briefly explain the objectives of “Portfolio Management”.
b. Distinguish between „Systematic risk‟ and „Unsystematic risk‟.
c. Discuss the various kinds of Systematic and Unsystematic risk?
d. What sort of investor normally views the variance (or Standard
Deviation) of an individual security‟s return as the security‟s proper
measure of risk?
e. What sort of investor rationally views the beta of a security as the
security‟s proper measure of risk? In answering the question, explain
the concept of beta.
f. Write short note on Factors affecting investment decisions in portfolio
management.
g. Explain the Efficient Market Theory and what are major misconceptions
about this theory?
h. Explain the different levels or forms of Efficient Market Theory and
what are various empirical evidence for these forms?
i. Explain the three form of Efficient Market Hypothesis.
j. Explain different challenges to Efficient Market Theory.
k. Discuss the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and its relevant
assumptions.
l. Discuss the Random Walk Theory.
m. Discuss how the risk associated with securities is affected by
Government policy.
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 30 of 31
Correlation: Correlation indicates the strength of relationship between two
variables.
Covariance (a statistical measure) between two securities or two portfolios
or a security and a portfolio indicating how the rates of return for the two
concerned behave relative to each other. Covariance between 2 securities
can be +ve, -ve or zero.
Coefficient of Correlation: Coefficient of Correlation is a statistical
measure which indicates the degree to which changes to the value of a
variable indicates the change in the value of the other variable. In positively
correlated variables, the value of the variable increases or decreases in
tandem with the value of another variable and the change depends on the
degree of coefficient. In negatively correlated variables, the change will be
vice versa.
C A & C M A Coaching Centre, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. P V Ram, B. Sc., ACA, ACMA – 98481 85073
Score 60+ thro’ SYSTEMATIC & SMART Study Page 31 of 31