Swat Standards
Swat Standards
Swat Standards
Operations Standard
for
Law Enforcement Agencies
COPYRIGHT
All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form or
by any means electronic or mechanical or by any information storage and retrieval system now
known or hereafter invented, without prior written permission of the National Tactical Officers
Association (NTOA), with the following exception:
NTOA staff and training instructors are hereby given permission by NTOA to reproduce any or
all of the contents of this manual for internal use within the organization or for training classes.
No other individuals, private businesses and corporations, public and private agencies and
colleges, professional associations, and law enforcement agencies may print or download this
publication for commercial use without permission from the NTOA.
Questions about this copyright information or about obtaining permission to use NTOA-
developed publications may be addressed to the Executive Director at 1-800-279-9127.
CONTENTS
Copyright ............................................................................................................................. 2
Contents .............................................................................................................................. 3
NTOA Mission Statement.................................................................................................... 4
Standard Review Committee .............................................................................................. 5
Acknowledgements............................................................................................................. 7
Introduction and Objective ................................................................................................. 8
Sections
1.0 Scope of Standard ................................................................................................... 9
2.0 Defining Tactical Law Enforcement Operations ................................................... 10
3.0 Tactical Law Enforcement Capabilities ................................................................. 17
4.0 Agency Policy Governing SWAT Teams ................................................................ 31
5.0 Crisis Negotiations Teams .................................................................................... 35
6.0 Operational Planning ............................................................................................ 38
7.0 Multi-Jurisdictional and Regional SWAT Operations ……………………………………….. 39
8.0 Glossary ................................................................................................................. 40
9.0 Supporting Documents……………………………………………………………………………………..48
The mission of the National Tactical Officers Association is to enhance the performance and
professional status of law enforcement personnel by providing a credible and proven training
resource, as well as a forum for the development of tactics and information exchange. The
Association’s ultimate goal is to improve public safety and domestic security through training,
education and tactical excellence. The National Tactical Officers Association operates in accord
with the principles of Veritas Probitas et Virtus (Truth, Honesty and Integrity).
Eric Daigle....................... Daigle Law Group LLC CT Principle – Executive Director/ General Counsel
New England Tactical Officers Association
Chris Eklund.................... Sergeant, Orange County Sheriff’s Office (FL); President, Florida SWAT
Association
Thor Eells ........................ Executive Director, NTOA; Colorado Springs Police Department (CO) (ret)
Don Kester...................... Director of Training and Education, NTOA; Pima County Sheriff’s
Department (AZ) (ret)
Walter Martin ................ Captain (ret), Frankfort Police Department (KY); Kentucky Tactical Officers
Association
Paul Massock.................. Chief, Force Review Office, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and
Explosives
Ed Mohn ......................... Deputy Chief, Winthrop Harbor Police Department (IL); Tactical
Commander, NIPAS Emergency Services Team; Vice President, Illinois
Tactical Officers Association
Brian Mueller ................. Chief Deputy, Washington County Sheriff’s Office (MN); President, Special
Operations Training Association of Minnesota
Travis Norton ................. Lieutenant, Oceanside Police Department (CA); Regional Representative,
CATO
© 2008, 2011, 2015, 2018 NTOA. All rights reserved. 5
NTOA TROS 2018
Nick Schneider ............... Assistant Team Leader, Salt Lake City Police Department; President, Utah
Tactical Officers Association
Doug Scholz .................... Sergeant, Chandler Police Department (AZ); President, Arizona Tactical
Officers Association
Ian Stewart ..................... Lieutenant, Larimer County Sheriff's Office (CO); Immediate Past-
President, Rocky Mountain Tactical Team Association
Luke Sherman ................ Sergeant, Tulsa Police Department (OK); NTOA Board of Directors,
Chairman
Jeremy Taylor ................. Officer, Kennewick Police Department (WA); Vice President, Washington
State Tactical Officers Association
Mark Walker .................. Deputy Commander, SOG, United States Marshals Service
Daniel Wesolowski ......... Sergeant, Milwaukee Police Department (WI); Past President, Association
of SWAT Personnel - Wisconsin
John Williams ................. Captain, Olathe Police Department (KS); Board Vice-President, Kansas City
Metro Tactical Officers Association
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The NTOA Tactical Response and Operations Standard for Law Enforcement Agencies could not
have been developed without the combined effort of numerous dedicated SWAT operators and
tactical commanders that are members of the NTOA organization. All member comments were
received and taken under consideration by the Standard Review Committee.
The National Tactical Officers Association also gratefully acknowledges the hard work and
leadership of many of the state and national law enforcement association partners. This
document and the critical work of these pioneers, served as a guide for this document.
In addition, the NTOA Standard Review Committee recognizes the work done by the
International Association of Chiefs of Police, Patrol and Tactical Operations Sub-Committee
(IACP/PTO) on the SWAT Concepts and Issues Paper, October 2010, as well as the 2011 SWAT
Glossary document developed by members of the California Association of Tactical Officers
(CATO).
It is the position of the NTOA that the decision to form a tactical law enforcement resource,
specifically a SWAT team, carries with it the responsibility to provide the ongoing training,
equipment, leadership and financial support necessary to create and maintain an effective
response capability. Integral to this responsibility is the obligation to deploy and operate these
resources in a manner that is consistent with Constitutional principles, with an emphasis on
professional deportment under all circumstances.
Where size and/or demographics limit the capabilities of an agency, this standard recommends
that multi-jurisdictional resources be combined and coordinated in a manner which is
consistent with reliable and safe operations. Over the past 35 years, the National Tactical
Officers Association has assisted many law enforcement agencies in developing multi-
jurisdictional teams by providing references, documentation and training to facilitate their
efforts. The NTOA remains committed and available to any law enforcement agency or its
members who require such assistance.
The objective of this document is to establish a basic set of standards for the association’s
member agencies and to serve as an efficient core set of concepts and principles that improve
standardization within the profession of tactical law enforcement services. Any agency that
chooses to use this standard as a benchmark for performance and operations does so
voluntarily. The NTOA does not mandate compliance with this standard or attach such
compliance as a prerequisite for any benefit granted under membership.
1.0 The scope of this standard includes concepts and principles that relate to the
organization, training, operational tactics, personnel management and
equipment of tactical law enforcement teams. The standard will not dictate how
member agencies will write and apply any specific policies as it relates to such
operations, but rather provide guidance based upon the terminology and
collective viewpoint of the NTOA organization and its stakeholder partners.
2.1.1 Based upon the need to protect the public and ensure the safe delivery of
tactical law enforcement services, the NTOA believes that a SWAT Tier 1 team
must be mission capable in ALL of the following areas: hostage rescue,
barricaded gunman, sniper operations, high-risk warrant service and high-risk
apprehension, high-risk security operations, terrorism response, special
assignments and other incidents which exceed the capability and/ or capacity of
an agency’s first responders and/or investigative units. The most resource
demanding of these missions is clearly planned deliberate hostage rescue
operations. An appropriate number of personnel is necessary to rapidly and
effectively dominate a structure and have an adequate number of operators in
place for a failed breach. As an example, during a hostage situation occurring at
a common residential structure, this would typically require a Team Commander
(1) and Team Leader or Tactical Operations Coordinator (1) to run a command
post, two Sniper/Observer Teams (4) to cover all sides of the structure, at least
four Operators for containment (4), an Immediate Reaction Team of one Team
Leader and seven operators (8) and a comparable team of the same size (8) who
is given time to plan and rehearse a deliberate rescue plan. Recognizing of
course that containment and immediate reaction functions can be shared
responsibilities. This is also with the assumption that all team members arrive
and the incident can be resolved in one operational period. Those teams that do
not possess the appropriate number of personnel, but maintain all of the
necessary mission capabilities, are defined as SWAT Tier 2 teams. SWAT Tier 2
© 2008, 2011, 2015, 2018 NTOA. All rights reserved. 10
NTOA TROS 2018
2.1.2 Tactical Response Teams are typically formed to address one or more mission
capabilities other than deliberate hostage rescue operations, such as warrant
service, barricaded subject or some type of high-risk security operations.
2.1.3 Perimeter Control and Containment Teams are typically formed as an immediate
response to an ongoing incident and primarily responsible for containing the
incident, evacuations and establishing incident command.
Figure 1
2.2 Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) and Tactical Response (TRT) teams are
designated law enforcement teams, whose members are recruited, selected,
trained, equipped and assigned to resolve critical incidents involving a threat to
public safety, which would otherwise exceed the capabilities of traditional law
enforcement first responders and/or investigative units. SWAT and TRT are
accepted titles for teams with specialized training, expertise and equipment as
defined above and further defined within this standard. The primary
characteristic of such teams that distinguishes them from other units is the focus
of effort. Such teams are focused on incident resolution, as opposed to other
functions, such as investigation. Their purpose is to increase the likelihood of
safely resolving critical incidents. Nothing in this standard is intended to preclude
agencies from utilizing specially trained units in areas such as narcotics
investigations, felony apprehension and other tasks. However, agencies that do
not have their own SWAT team and instead utilize specially trained units should
have a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with a SWAT team that recognizes
and operates within the guidelines as set forth by this standard. This SWAT team
can be a full-time, collateral-duty, multi-jurisdictional or regional team. The
agreement should specify that the named SWAT team is the designated entity to
be activated for SWAT-specific incidents such as hostage situations, barricade
incidents or other high-risk situations requiring specialized capabilities.
SWAT and TRT teams should have the following elements available when
appropriate:
2.3 Until the arrival of the requested SWAT team, it is recommended that those
agencies that do not have SWAT team response capability and currently utilize a
Perimeter Control and Containment Team, should focus on engaging in the
following activities as time permits:
Establish an effective perimeter, which may include:
• Coordinating containment/isolation security teams
• Deploying patrol rifle teams
• Deploying canine handlers
• Confirming traffic/pedestrian control
• Deploying aviation support unit
• The deployment and staging of EMS, fire suppression, Haz Mat and decon
units.
2.3.1 Once a perimeter is set, law enforcement units should establish an Immediate
Action Team in the event that the situation suddenly changes requiring officers
on scene to take immediate action. Primary responsibilities of the “Immediate
Action Team” are to prevent escape and to take the suspect into custody if
surrender occurs. This team should continuously assess and identify its
limitations and assist in scene transition to SWAT when appropriate. In the
event of a dynamic or rapidly escalating incident such as an active killer situation
or one that exigent circumstances may require immediate intervention to save
lives, the Immediate Action Team, or a single officer if necessary, will track and
move to stop the threat before the suspect kills or seriously injures victims.
2.3.2 Timely request of specialized units such as SWAT and CNT is critical and will
greatly increase safety and contribute to a successful resolution. When possible,
commence with negotiations once perimeter and Immediate Action Teams are
established. This may result in a safe surrender, assist with gathering intelligence
and slow the suspect actions, allowing time for SWAT resources to arrive.
2.3.3 Any action taken during a high-risk incident before SWAT is able to respond,
should be reasonable and necessary. Such decisions should be based on the
totality of the circumstances and the safety priorities model. There may be a
need for a single officer intervention to a violent event in order to stop an active
on-going threat. The above-listed considerations are not mandates, nor all
inclusive, and any decision to implement or not implement them should be
based upon the training, equipment and capabilities of the officers on scene.
3.1.1 SWAT teams conducting hostage rescue operations should train and equip their
personnel in the following competencies:
EOD/entry integration
3.1.3 SWAT teams conducting sniper operations should train and equip their
personnel in the following competencies*:
• Stress shooting
• Discretionary shooting
• Weapon maintenance
3.1.4 SWAT teams conducting high-risk warrant service and high-risk apprehension
operations should train and equip their personnel in the following
competencies:
• Floor plans
• Unusual incidents (damage, use of force)
• Arrest and control procedures
• Warrant service options
• Contain and call out
• Deliberate search techniques
• Transitional tactics
• Aggressive animal mitigation
• Bomb squad/entry integration
• Explosive device recognition and mitigation
3.1.5 SWAT teams conducting high-risk security operations should train and equip
their personnel in the following competencies as resources allow:
3.1.6 SWAT teams conducting terrorism response operations should train and equip
their personnel in the following competencies:
3.2 SWAT and Tactical Response Teams should be equipped appropriately for the
mission capabilities they are tasked with. The following lists provide guidance to
teams regarding the minimum levels of equipment that are necessary for both
SWAT and Tactical Response Teams.
3.2.1 Any officer assigned to either a SWAT Team (Tier 1 or 2) or a Tactical Response
Team should be equipped with the following items assigned to that officer:
National Institute of Justice (NIJ) rated Ballistic Vest and/or Plate Carrier
• Misc. Gear Pouches
NIJ rated Ballistic Helmet
Weapon System(s)
Handgun
• Holster/Light/Magazines
Rifle/Sub-gun/Shotgun
• Optics/Slings/Accessories/Magazines
Communications Equipment
Radio, Headset, Ear Piece, PTT (push to talk) switches
Protective Eyewear/Goggles (Impact Resistant)
Hearing Protection
Elbow & Knee Pads
Protective gloves
Level D ensemble (Deployment Uniform) appropriate for the local climate
and hazards
Air Purifying Respirators (APR) with National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH) approved filters for the hazards they
potentially could be exposed to
Individual First Aid Kit (IFAK)/Tourniquet etc.
Restraint devices
Less lethal option unless supported by team equipment
3.2.2 SWAT Teams (Tier 1 or 2) and Tactical Response Teams should be equipped with
the following items as general team equipment based on mission capabilities:
3.2.3 Tier 1 SWAT Teams, conducting planned deliberate hostage rescue operations
should be equipped with the following items:
Armored Rescue Vehicle(s) (ARV)
Tactical Robot(s)
• Large Robot Platforms
• Medium Robot Platforms
• Small Robot Platforms
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle(s) (UAV)
Technical Support/Surveillance Equipment
• Video/Audio/Fiber Optic Equipment
• Pole Cameras
• Under Door Cameras
• Pinhole Cameras
• Monitors & Accessories
Explosive Breaching Equipment
Specialized Breaching Equipment
• Ballistic
• Mechanical
• Thermal
• Hydraulic
Navigation Equipment
• Night Vision Goggles/Optics
• Global Positioning System (GPS)
3.2.4 Tier 1 SWAT Teams also conducting these advanced mission capabilities may
require additional corresponding specialized equipment:
3.3 Law enforcement specialized tactical teams often deploy to high-risk, large-scale,
and extended operations and under conditions that place hostages, bystanders,
police officers, and suspects at increased risk for injury or illness. The risk profile
calls for incorporating a medical element into all phases of these operations. In
addition to rendering immediate medical care, properly trained medical
© 2008, 2011, 2015, 2018 NTOA. All rights reserved. 27
NTOA TROS 2018
• Law enforcement agencies should advocate for state and local EMS
guidelines that define the scope of practice for Emergency Medical
Technicians and Paramedics supporting law enforcement operations.
3.4 Operational support functions may also include, but are not limited to, the
following mission specific elements:
4.2 The policy topics listed below are not all inclusive, but do provide the minimum
basis for the sound management of any tactical team. Team commanders are
strongly encouraged to explore any and all topics that may need to be
established through a specific policy.
4.2.1 Policy that identifies team organization and function which includes an
organizational diagram. Command relationships between the SWAT or TRT
team, incident commander, Crisis Negotiation Team (CNT) and any other joint or
support elements that ensure clear lines of responsibility and compliance with
the protocols of the National Incident Management System and the Incident
Command System. If applicable, Mutual Aid Agreements and/or governmental
support requests shall be incorporated into this policy.
4.2.3 Policy that outlines training requirements as designated by tasks. Minimum time
periods should be established to develop and maintain assigned critical skills.
4.2.3.1 Team command should facilitate the development of appropriate annual training
plans, lesson plans, schedules, and management protocols for the conduct of
© 2008, 2011, 2015, 2018 NTOA. All rights reserved. 31
NTOA TROS 2018
training that are consistent with the NTOA TROS. This should include, but is not
limited to, designation and delineation of critical skills and the required internal
certification processes as well as development of minimum training hour
requirements based on the critical skills identified and the team’s unique
operational tempo. The training program should include a documentation and
verification process.
4.2.3.2 Training should incorporate current NTOA standards relating to safe conduct and
the development of scenario-based exercises.
4.2.3.3 Based upon the mission competencies of a SWAT Tier 1 or Tier 2 team previously
described in this standard, it would be difficult for most collateral-duty or full-
time teams to maintain operational readiness without meeting the following
training recommendations:
• New member initial training: Minimum 40-hour Basic SWAT course that
introduces new operators to the fundamental skill sets required for most
mission capabilities. Successful completion of an introductory course is
not meant to be all encompassing and should not suggest that an
operator is fully competent. Basic SWAT courses should be followed by a
formal competencies-based field training program, supervised by a senior
SWAT trainer.
4.2.4 Policy that explains the activation and deployment approval process of the team.
Teams operating through an MOU, should include an automatic notification and
activation system to ensure the appropriate resources are deployed for the
significance of the event.
4.2.5 Policy that addresses the appropriation, care, maintenance and inventory of
team equipment. It should also address normal life-cycle wear and removal of
obsolete or faulty team equipment.
4.2.7 The development of appropriate protocols and procedures for the conduct of
long-term or extended operations. Protocols shall include, at a minimum,
processes for relief and rotation of personnel and proper staffing and training of
a supplemental incident command center.
4.2.8 Policy requiring a threat/risk assessment for team deployments, specifically for
pre-planned events such as high-risk warrant service. The operational
threat/risk assessment should include an appropriate medical response plan.
4.2.9 Policy requiring after-action reports (AARs) which capture tactical and incident
debriefing information for training purposes. SWAT command should review all
AARs, critiques, tactics and actions taken by all elements during the critical
incident. Documentation should be retained in accordance with agency policy
and state statute.
4.2.10 SWAT command should be capable of producing a written annual report, which
should include a summary of all activations, nature of incident, resolution,
injuries occurred, use of force and other critical information. Agencies should
consider entering relevant data into the FBI Hostage Barricade System (HOBAS)
database (http://www.cjis.gov/) . Username and password are required.
4.3 Agency policies and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) should be reviewed
and approved annually and any changes shall include a risk assessment based on,
but not limited to, the following criteria;
Training updates: Ensuring agency policy and SOP correspond with latest
training received. Compliance with applicable law as well as an ongoing
assessment of risk management processes.
All prior versions of SOPs should be archived for historical and potential
litigation purposes.
5.3 Just as the SWAT component of any operation has their own Tactical Operations
Center (TOC), so does the Crisis Negotiation Team. The Negotiations Operations
Center (NOC) should be close to or collocated with, but not within the TOC, to
allow both components to carry out their functions efficiently and without
interference. A NOC can be a dedicated vehicle or temporary space within a
structure if allowed by the circumstances. A dedicated communications system
that provides a listening only option (headset, speakers) for the tactical
commander is advisable.
5.4 As recommended by the National Council of Negotiations Associations
(www.ncna.us), individuals selected to become negotiators should receive
training which includes:
• A minimum of 40 hours in a qualified course
• Training should include basic concepts and techniques, abnormal
psychology, assessment, crisis/suicide intervention, active listening skills,
case studies, meaningful role-playing drills, and an incident management
overview
As with all critical law enforcement skills, such as firearms, negotiators should
periodically receive updated training and practice in order to maintain
proficiency. It is recommended negotiators annually attend a minimum of 40
hours of training in order to stay proficient. Additionally, it is highly
recommended that they attend regional or national conferences, learning from
case study presentations, and conduct joint training with tactical teams.
5.5 Negotiations teams should at a minimum be equipped with reliable and diverse
methods to communicate with suspects in a wide variety of environments and to
record these communications. At a minimum:
• Throw phone capable of being introduced into a barricaded area
• Cellular device capable of voice, data, text, and video
• Public address system.
• An internet capable-device with the ability to run social media
applications.
If negotiators are sworn law enforcement officers, they should be armed and
equipped with industry standard ballistic armor. Those sworn negotiators
should consider carrying intermediate weapons (Taser, baton, OC spray) as they
will invariably interact with the emotional friends and families of barricaded
subjects in the process of gathering intelligence. If sworn negotiators are tasked
with negotiating from within threat areas (i.e. an armored rescue vehicle, from
behind cover or while wearing an APR in a chemical agent environment), they
should be trained and equipped appropriately to do so. Such training should
include movement with tactical operators, familiarization with deployment
vehicles and proper donning and use of relevant personal protective equipment.
6.2 All SWAT team members should be trained in and capable of demonstrating
proficiency in operational planning concepts.
6.3 Documentation should be retained in accordance with agency policy and state
statute.
6.4 All personnel shall have thorough knowledge of the “Deadly Force” or force
continuum for their agency, State and Federal law.
8.0 Glossary
Active killer An armed suspect who is actively killing or attempting to kill civilians
and/or law enforcement and continues to do so while having access to
additional victims.
After-action report A document to be completed following a debriefing or after-action review
of a planned or spontaneous operation to include the actions taken (or
failures to act and omissions) by personnel, mission results and any
pertinent and relevant information related to same operation including
lessons learned and any training recommendations identified.
Documentation should be supported with the operational plan, related
reports, and any other written or photographic material associated with
the operation.
After-action review A structured process for analyzing a particular operation or exercise and
usually includes subject matter experts or superiors, not assigned to the
team, specifically tasked with identifying areas for improvement.
Armored rescue vehicle A vehicle that is or has been hardened to protect the occupants from
small arms fire and fragmentation. Also known as an “ARV.”
Arrest team A team of operators established to contact, control and detain suspect(s).
Primary function is to safely and effectively receive anyone exiting a
location. May also serve as the Immediate Reaction Team or Emergency
Reaction Team depending on personnel available.
Barricaded subject A barricade situation may be defined as the standoff created by an armed
or potentially armed suspect in any location, whether fortified or not,
who is refusing to comply with lawful orders for surrender.
Breach and hold A tactical technique by operators to maintain and hold their positions in
close proximity of the entry point of a incident location after breaching
that entry point. Also known as “breach and delay.”
Brief back The formal process after an operational briefing (or as part of that
process) wherein an operator will recite back to the team leader or
operational leader his/her specific assignment/s and tactical/equipment
responsibilities for a pending operation.
Casualty collection point Designated secure location for the collection of injured persons.
Chemical agents Any liquid, solid, or gas compound that works psychologically and/or
physiologically to create discomfort in humans.
CNT Crisis Negotiation Team. Responsible for developing actionable
intelligence regarding any negotiations/tactical problem, contribute to a
risk assessment, open lines of communication with a suspect, and use
active listening and bargaining techniques to negotiate a surrender.
Command and control The exercise of authority and delegated by a properly designated
commanding officer over law enforcement personnel in the
accomplishment of the mission.
Compromise authority Direct action authority granted by the Incident Command/Tactical
Commander to a team leader authorizing the initiation of specific action
and or series of actions in response to actions taken by the suspect(s).
Containment Pre-designated perimeter positions of incident location(s) to control and
contain suspect movements.
Contain and call out A technique associated with a tactical element surrounding and
establishing containment of an incident location before contact with
occupants to facilitate a subsequent callout of those occupants in a
controlled manner to a secured and safe area. Also known as “Surround
and Call Out.”
Diversion A physical or psychological tactic used to draw a suspect away from the
principal point of contact, used to draw attention away from the primary
action.
Dynamic tactics Tactics comprised of a group of techniques that are characterized by
continuous productive activity and not specifically by the speed of
movement.
Emergency entry/rescue Making an emergency entry into a location with little or no intelligence
when there is an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury to
civilians or law enforcement personnel.
Entry Any procedure to gain entrance to any tactical threat environment, such
as structures, conveyances or property.
Explosive breaching Use of explosives to breach entry/access points and porting. The precise
application of measured amounts of explosive compounds in order to
affect an opening.
Flash Sound A device creating a bright flash and loud report designed to temporarily
Diversionary Device divert the attention of persons in the immediate vicinity, giving tactical
(FSDD) teams a window of opportunity to exploit to their advantage. May also be
referred to as a Noise Flash Diversionary Device (NFDD).
Hard target weapon A weapon system, that due to its unique kinetic energy and terminal
system penetration qualities, is capable of defeating armored locations and/or
vehicles that pose a threat to public safety.
High-risk apprehension A search for or arrest of a suspect in any environment that is
characterized by known or suspected hazards and risks to such a degree
that the service of which exceeds the capabilities of the normal patrol and
investigative functions.
High-risk warrant A search or arrest warrant characterized by known or suspected hazards
and risks to such a degree that the service of which exceeds the
capabilities of the normal patrol and investigative functions.
Hostage A person held by force or fear by a hostage taker who intends to harm the
person or as security that specified terms or an ultimatum will be met.
Hostage rescue Deployment of a tactical team in defense of life to save and rescue
hostages.
Improvised Explosive A homemade explosive device.
Device (IED)
Immediate reaction A team prepared to respond to unplanned events at the crisis site. This
team team may also be tasked with Arrest Team responsibilities based upon
personnel available.
Incident commander The individual responsible for all incident activities, including the
development of strategies and tactics and the ordering and the release of
resources. The IC has overall authority and responsibility for conducting
incident operations and is responsible for the management of all incident
operations at the incident site.
Incident command The field location at which the primary tactical-level, on-scene incident
be documented.
Objectives The desired result or final outcome of a tactical operation. Used to
provide a focal point for directing the efforts to attain it without requiring
excessive instructions or meticulous supervision.
Operator A sworn law enforcement officer trained, equipped and assigned to a
tactical law enforcement operations unit or team.
Operational plan Any plan, written or unwritten, which seeks to achieve an acceptable
resolution by allocating resources and affixing responsibility to members
of the organization.
Performance standards Levels of performance required for planning and carrying out missions or
tasks, used to evaluate individual and team performance, serve as a guide
for evaluating a training session and as a basis for debriefing an operation.
Personal protection Perform duties associated with providing protection to dignitaries, VIP’s,
detail witnesses, or other protectees.
Port and cover Breaching and/or removal of all obstructions/barriers within a window,
door or wall and/or similar opening to allow operators to enter location,
deploy FSDD and/or safely observe and cover a room’s interior and any
occupants from outside the location after porting.
Rapid deployment The immediate deployment of law enforcement resources to life-
threatening situations where the delay in such deployment could result in
death and/or great bodily harm to persons.
Reactionary authority Unless otherwise specified during a SWAT mission, SWAT officers should
react to deadly threats according to their agency policy governing the use
of force. Officers are cautioned that the use of the sound tactical
judgement is to be utilized when reacting to deadly threats and the safety
of innocent victims is paramount.
Reconnaissance The systematic observation and documentation of the physical
characteristics of an objective and the surrounding area.
Risk assessment The process of evaluating and determining the presence of any or all
potential hazards or dangerous conditions to law enforcement personnel
and the public that may be present or may occur during an operation or
training to determine the appropriate risk level of that pending action.
Vehicle takedown Perform duties associated with approaching an armed suspect contained
within a stationary vehicle. Also known as “high-Risk vehicle takedown.”
Warrant service Performing or carrying out an arrest or search warrant on a location.
Window of opportunity A set of favorable circumstances that offer an advantage during a tactical
operation if appropriately exploited in a timely manner.
For further sample documents, please refer to the NTOA website’s File Sharing area which is
available to members only.