Research Paper
Research Paper
Research Paper
Introduction
In the era of Social media, brand building has become a challenge. This is not how things were supposed to
be. A decade ago many companies were waiting for the arrival of a new era of branding. They hired many
creative agencies and groups of technologists to insert brands throughout the digital universe.
As a central feature of their digital strategy, companies made huge bets on branded content. The thinking was
that Social media would allow the company to leapfrog traditional media and forge relationships directly with
the customers. Telling customers great stories and connecting with them in real time will make the brand a
hub for a community of consumers. Businesses have invested billions pursuing this vision. Yet very few
brands have been able to generate meaningful consumer interest online. In fact, social media seems to have
made brands less significant.
Bibliography
https://dreamscape.co.in/blog/branding-in-the-age-of-social-media/
https://hbr.org/2016/03/branding-in-the-age-of-social-media
Review of Literature
I. DOUGLAS HOLT
Harvard business review, 2016
Social media was supposed to usher in a golden age of branding. But things didn’t turn out that way.
Marketers originally thought that Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter would let them bypass mainstream media
and connect directly with customers. Hoping to attract huge audiences to their brands, they spent billions
producing their own creative content. But consumers never showed up. In fact, social media seems to have
made brands less significant. What happened? The issue is, social media has transformed how culture works,
in a way that weakens certain branding techniques. It has united once-isolated communities into influential
crowd cultures. Crowd cultures are very prolific cultural innovators. Their members produce their own
content—so well that companies simply can’t compete. Consider that people making videos in their living
rooms top the charts on YouTube, which few companies have managed to crack. While they diminish the
impact of branded content, crowd cultures grease the wheels for an alternative approach, cultural branding. In
it, a brand sets itself apart by promoting a new ideology that springs from the crowd.
The internet has upended how consumers engage with brands. It is transforming the economics of marketing
and making obsolete many of the function’s traditional strategies and structures. For marketers, the old way
of doing business is unsustainable. Consumers still want a clear brand promise and offerings they value. What
has changed is when—at what touch points—they are most open to influence, and how you can interact with
them at those points. In the past, marketing strategies that put the lion’s share of resources into building brand
awareness and then opening wallets at the point of purchase worked pretty well. But touch points have changed
in both number and nature, requiring a major adjustment to realign marketers’ strategy and budgets with where
consumers are actually spending their time.
In the digital age, firms seem to benefit from having a strong market orientation and a holistic branding
approach with robust integration of their different functions. Branding in the digital age not only requires
strong internal communication and consistent external communication, but also positioning of the brand in
topical conversations. For an industrial organization, becoming an opinion leader is a strategy well-suited to
branding and can be supported by creating relevant content subsequently delivered through various social
media channels.
Social media technologies such as YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook promised a new participatory online
culture. Yet, technology insider Alice Marwick contends in this insightful book, “Web 2.0” only encouraged
a preoccupation with status and attention. Her original research—which includes conversations with
entrepreneurs, Internet celebrities, and Silicon Valley journalists—explores the culture and ideology of San
Francisco’s tech community in the period between the dot com boom and the App store, when the city was
the world’s center of social media development. Marwick argues that early revolutionary goals have failed to
materialize: while many continue to view social media as democratic, these technologies instead turn users
into marketers and self-promoters, and leave technology companies poised to violate privacy and to prioritize
profits over participation. Marwick analyzes status-building techniques—such as self-branding, micro-
celebrity, and life-streaming—to show that Web 2.0 did not provide a cultural revolution, but only furthered
inequality and reinforced traditional social stratification, demarcated by race, class, and gender.
The traditional branding paradigm involved heavy upfront investment and tightly managing the image via
controlled communications in hopes of creating dominant brands that could be leveraged to cultivate loyalty
and a long-term, steady stream of profits. However, social media can drastically alter consumers’ behavior
and their brand preferences. This rapidly evolving landscape has left managers at a loss, and what they are
experiencing is likely the beginning of a tectonic shift in the way brands are managed. In this article, we take
a close look at the building blocks of branding and also examine the core of social media. After careful analysis
of the two, we discuss the likely impact social media will have on the practice of brand management. We
conclude that it will extend beyond the narrow confines of the use of social media as a message platform, to
the core of how markets are targeted and products are delivered. We make recommendations regarding how
companies can manage various facets of branding in this new marketplace.
Creative Strategies in Social Media Marketing: An Exploratory Study of Branded Social Content and
Consumer Engagement. This study employed a content analysis of the creative strategies present in the social
media content shared by a sample of top brands. The results reveal which social media channels are being
used, which creative strategies/appeals are being used, and how these channels and strategies relate to
consumer engagement in branded social media. Past research has suggested that brands should focus on
maintaining a social presence across social channels with content that is fresh and frequent and includes
incentives for consumer participation (Ling et al., 2004). This study confirmed the importance of frequent
updates and incentives for participation. In addition, several creative strategies were associated with customer
engagement, specifically experiential, image, and exclusivity messages. Despite the value of these creative
approaches, most branded social content can be categorized as functional.
Social media research in the industrial marketing field: Review of literature and future research directions
Since the emergence of social media, industrial marketing academics and marketers have also been intrigued
by the influence of such media on the discipline. As, social media research in the field of industrial marketing
has been of increasing interest, this research attempts to review and assess the advances in social media
research in the industrial marketing field. From the literature review conducted, it can be identified that some
of the research areas have witnessed steady theory development increases, e.g., sales and marketing
communications, while others are clearly lagging behind, e.g., pricing and ethics. Also methodological
pluralism is called for instead of more traditional methods (conceptual analysis, qualitative and survey) to
establish and solve more nuanced research problems. This research provides a review of the current state of
research in the field and suggests directions for future development.
Academics and the business community are interested in learning how social media can benefit (or harm)
consumer‐brand engagement. As more branding activity goes social, marketers are not always welcome in all
social media spaces. In this invited commentary, the authors aim to lay out the challenges that social media
faces for enhancing consumer‐brand engagement. In doing so, they seek to turn social media challenges into
future research directions.
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relative impact of brand communication on brand equity through
social media as compared to traditional media. In a juxtaposition of different industries it aims at: investigating
whether both communication instruments have an impact on consumer‐based brand equity; comparing the
effect sizes of these two communication instruments; and separating the effects of firm‐created and user‐
generated social media communication.
BRANDING METHODOLOGY
Already in the late 90’s we identified how branding developed from a product/service focus, a Transaction
Branding, (introduced as an extension of the industrialism), into today’s prevailing Relation Branding,
(introduced by the Internet), in which the Customer Experience is in focus, and the relationship developed
between the brand and customer has become the essence of a modern brand. Branding for us is defined as
“managing the perception in people’s minds”. Branding is one of the key management systems in a modern
business. The significant difference between todays branding is the importance of involvement of key
stakeholders, including the customers, in the branding process, in everything from product development,
distribution, sales, reviewing and recommending, etc. The strategy creation (or “decoding” if a brand already
exists) of a brand is always done as top management team in a 1-1,5 day workshop, which, apart from
providing a true distributed ownership of the setting up of the brand among the key people in the organisation,
is also committing and strengthening the executive team. Thomas Gad created hands-on tools and models to
develop this new type of brands for the new (digital) age, including the 4-Dimensional Brand Mind Space
(BMS) and Brand Code (BC), Brand Activity Generator (BAG) and the Customer Experience Touch-Points
(CXTP). In his practice he and his team have a vast and successful experience of working with his modern
branding techniques across businesses of various size, in different business areas, and in different business
situations like: launching, re-branding, mergers & acquisitions, entering new markets, start-ups etc.. Also with
places: cities, regions & countries, public institutions and with people – personal branding. Here below are
the 4 basic steps of the 4D Branding.
Brand Strategy
The Brand Strategy is created following a very precise structured process starts with the expected outcome of
the Brand in the minds of the stakeholders. The model we use for this is the 4-Dimensional Brand Mind Space
(BMS). The Brand Mind Space is how the Brand is taking its place in people’s minds, it’s a “stretching out”
process of the brand’s 4-dimensions, creating a successful, valuable and appreciated brand. The 4-dimensions
are: The Functional, The Social, The Mental (the individual) and The Spiritual (the purpose & meaning)
dimensions of the Brand. The second model we use is called The Brand Code (BC). It has six inputs: Product
(Service, Place, Benefit, etc), Positioning, Style, Values.
Internal Brand Activation
The Internal Brand Activation starts with setting the Brand Code in the centre of the 4-dimensional Brand
Mind Space (combining both of these models) and extending the strategy of the brands in terms of tangible,
hands-on activities in the 4-dimensions, Functional, Social, Mental and Spiritual Activities. We call this model
Brand Activity Generator (BAG). In addition we ask our clients to create 5 brand symbolic projects that are
demonstrating how the brand can be turned from a strategic idea into a tangible and visible outcome. Another
tool in activating the brand is creating a short Brand Story for everyone to tell when asked: what are you
doing? A Brand Book including a Brand Movie can be included as parts of the Internal Brand Activation.
Customer Brand Experience Touch-Points
The most important role of the Brand is to code and connect the different Touch Points with the customers
creating the final Customer Experience. In order to be able to manage each Touch-Points we help our
customers to code each touch point. With coding in this case we mean taking the decided Brand Code and
again setting it in the 4-Dimensional diagram and decided for each Touch-Point its most important criteria in
each of the 4 dimensions. There are three categories of touch-points: Static Touch Points (Ex: Promotion,
Advertising, Direct Mail, Products & Services themselves), Human Touch-Points (Sales, Service, Call
Centres, Management, Support, etc.) and Digital (Blogs, Mobile, Email, Social Media, Web, etc.).
External Brand Activation
We help our clients with various tailored ideas, programs and systems to continuously activate their brands
and see the strategy come alive in real customer and other stakeholder relations. We use our profound
experience of helping brands to launch and to maintain them over time. We have together with partners
developed a systematic approach and digital engines for social media including User Experience, the way
digital touch points are designed and perceived which should mirror the intentions in the brand strategy.
Branding Design:
Today competition between businesses is rather sharp. To stand out among the crowd, a company needs to be
unique and recognizable by customers. A strong brand is what stands behind each successful product.
Nielsen’s Global New Product Innovation Survey discovered that nearly 59% of people prefer to buy new
products from brands familiar to them, and 21% say they are ready to purchase a product if it comes from a
brand they like.
Some people got used to thinking that only marketing specialists do all the job in branding. However, if you
say it to professional designers, they’ll tell you how wrong you are. As an American graphic designer Paul
Rand said: «Design is the silent ambassador of your brand.» The article tells about the essence of branding as
well as the role of design in it. Also, we’ll define the key stages of effective brand creation.
6) A Style Guide
The work is done. The visual material is complete. The last task for the designer is to make sure clients will
use all the assets properly. A style guide is a document providing instructions about correct and wrong ways
to use the graphics created for the brand. Traditionally, a style guide includes the explanation of the idea
standing behind a logo as well as the presentation of a corporate color palette which can be used for different
purposes. It can be good to demonstrate the examples of incorrect usage in order to avoid poor visual
performance.
As you can see branding is a complex process. Each step should be well-thought, based on the needs of the
target audience and business goals.
Your audience:
Speaking in a way that your audience connects with is very important. That could include using certain lingo
and references that are popular in your target market. Taco Bell is constantly in tune with what’s popular with
its audience (a younger demographic) and crafts its social media posts to fit that voice.
Authenticity:
Whatever your social media voice develops into, make sure it’s authentic to your brand. Trying to sound a
certain way just to fit in can backfire.
4. Be Consistent With Your Topics
Sites like Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn are very good for content curation. Curating is a great way to
help you build authority in your industry as well as provide a steady flow of social media posts that aren’t
self-promotional. Finding blog posts, videos and other content to share with your audience sounds simple
enough. However, many businesses go into it blindly without creating a strategy or guidelines for what
topics to share.
5. Post Regularly
Nothing will kill social media branding efforts more than irregular posting. If you only Tweet once every
few days or upload one new Instagram picture a month, you’re going to be forgotten. Shortened attention
spans combined with rapidly growing social networks have made publishing more important than ever.
How frequently you post is going to depend on your audience. It will take some trial and error to find out what
works best for your brand. One of the best ways to determine how often you should post is to use Sprout
Social’s social media publishing and analytics tools.