Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Design of Cooled Tubular Reactor Systems

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

JOURNAL CRITIQUE

“Design of Cooled Tubular Reactor Systems”

Corcuera, Maria Glayza A.

Che191-1- B03
Design of Cooled Tubular Reactor Systems
William L. Luyben
November 3, 2001

The article entitled “Design of Cooled Tubular Reactor System” was published under

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. The author is a professor in Mountaintop Campus

Lehigh University under Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering. His research interests include

design and control of coupled reactor-column processes and plant recycle stream management.

The study circulated about the design methodology for considering all complex tradeoffs in a

reactor. He also considers the economic aspect on how is to minimize the total annual cost of the

process considering the following: annual capital cost of the reactor, catalyst, compressor, heat

exchanger, and furnace; and the operating cost of the compressor and furnace. He also considered

the following criteria in optimizing the best parameters for a tubular reactor.

The study encircled about the assumption that tubular reactor use is a plug flow reactor,

which means there are no radial temperature or concentration gradients and considering the

following factors that contributes major effects in the process. Tubular reactors are diverse in the

industry particularly with exothermic gas-phase reactions that require a solid catalyst which is

operated and works adiabatically. This paper presents a design methodology for considering all

these complex tradeoffs in aa tubular reactors including the pressure drop, heat removal, tube

length and temperature peak. Pressure drop through the reactor is important because of

compression costs of the gas recycle and is reduced by using large diameter tubes because of the

smaller velocities. Heat removal is also important in cooled reactors. Since the cost is also

considered, economic value of the equipment is also analyzed in this paper like the following the

annual capital cost of the reactor, catalyst, compressor, heat exchanger, and furnace; and the
operating cost of the compressor and furnace. As a result, showing the optimum design for the

system are having larger tube diameter and small pressure drops. Since there are reactions involved

as the reaction rates increases reactor size and recycle flows decrease, which leads to optimum

designs with smaller tube diameters and larger reactor pressure drops.

As part of my analysis in a technical aspect, first thing is the figures or graphs provided by

the author as a reader it is not easy for me to read the graph and also, he should only provide the

most important graphs for results so it is more convenient to understand and analyze. Most tubular

reactors are designed from pilot-plant experiments that explore the impact of tube diameter on

reactor performance and it is one of the good things about his study that he tried his process into a

pilot scale which is more practical in a way that if this process is feasible or not. Other thing is that

the flow of the study is vogue and as a reader it is not easy to identify of he is identifying the

methodology or if it is a result already. All in all, in his study he provided a new understanding

regarding into tubular reactors that can benefit the industry.

In conclusion, the most important thing is knowing the most economical way in order to

help the industry to be more efficient especially in the process and in the cost. Since tubular

reactors are widely used in the industry considering all the factors that may optimize that process

is really a big help. The overall all process may use a reference for further studies. Lastly, the

author gives justice on what he wants to pin point.

You might also like