Nifas
Nifas
Nifas
TABLE 2
Comparison of Clinicopathological Variables between Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix
n % n % P
Clinical variables
Age (years) ⫺40 147 13.8 52 21.7 0.003
41–50 367 34.5 86 35.8
51⫹ 550 51.7 102 42.5
Postmenopausal state No 556 52.3 146 60.8 0.016
Yes 508 47.7 94 39.2
Obesity No 965 90.7 213 88.8 0.357
Yes 99 9.3 27 11.3
FIGO clinical stage Ia–IIa 862 81.0 204 85.0 0.149
IIb⫹ 202 19.0 36 15.0
Treatment year ⫺1985 620 58.3 83 34.6 ⬍0.001
1986⫹ 444 41.7 157 65.4
Tumor size (mm) ⫺30 654 61.5 151 62.9 0.435
31–50 324 30.5 65 27.1
51⫹ 86 8.1 24 10.0
Pathological variables
Vaginal invasion No 821 77.2 201 83.8 0.002
Yes 243 22.8 39 16.3
Parametrial invasion No 817 76.8 190 79.2 0.427
Yes 247 23.2 50 20.8
Endometrial invasion No 947 89.0 201 83.8 0.023
Yes 117 11.0 39 16.3
Pelvic lymph node metastasis No 789 74.2 178 74.2 0.997
Yes 275 25.8 62 25.8
Depth of invasion (mm) ⫺10 555 52.2 132 55.0 0.571
10–15 240 22.6 55 22.9
15⫹ 269 25.3 53 22.1
cantly higher. The incidence of adenocarcinoma has increased in 15 patients with clinical stage Ia and in 11 with stage IIa
in recent years, as described previously [10, 11]. In the present adenocarcinoma. When classified by tumor size, the meta-
study, the incidence of pathological vaginal invasion of squa- static incidence of adenocarcinoma of 0% (0/102) in tumors
mous cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of smaller than 20 mm and of 2.0% (1/49) in 21- to 30-mm
adenocarcinoma, while the incidence of endometrial invasion tumors increased immediately to 10.8% in 31- to 50-mm
of squamous cell carcinoma was significantly lower. The inci- tumors and 29.2% in tumors larger than 51 mm (Table 3).
dence of pathological parametrial invasion of squamous cell The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma was 0.2% (1/
carcinoma was slightly higher than that of adenocarcinoma, but 444) in tumors smaller than 20 mm, 1.9% (11/583) in 21- to
the difference was not statistically significant. The incidences 60-mm tumors, and 5.4% (2/37) in tumors larger than 61
of large tumor maximum diameter greater than 30 mm, pelvic mm in diameter.
lymph node metastasis, and deep stromal invasion were not The logistic regression analysis with clinicopathological
significantly different between squamous cell carcinoma and variables revealed that the presence of pathological endo-
adenocarcinoma. metrial invasion and lymph node metastasis were the sig-
The associations of ovarian metastases with clinicopatho- nificant variables associated with ovarian metastasis of
logical variables are summarized in Table 3. While the inci- squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix (Table 4). In
dences of the metastases of clinical stage Ia, Ib, and IIa the analysis of adenocarcinoma, pathological endometrial
squamous cell carcinoma were 0.8% (1/132), 0.5% (3/614), invasion, lymph node metastasis, and pathological parame-
and 0.9% (1/116), respectively, the incidence increased imme- trial invasion were significant. When analyzed with clinical
diately to 4.0% (7/175) in clinical stage IIb and to 7.4% (2/27) variables only, clinical stage beyond IIb was a significant
in stage III–IV. The incidence of stage Ib adenocarcinoma was variable of squamous cell carcinoma, and a tumor size of
4.0% (7/178), compared to 14.8% (4/27) in stage IIb and more than 30 mm was a significant variable in adenocarci-
44.4% (4/9) in stage III–IV. No ovarian metastasis was found noma (Table 4).
OVARIAN METASTASIS OF CERVICAL CANCER 507
TABLE 3
Comparison of Clinicopathological Variables and Ovarian Metastasis between Squamous Cell Carcinoma
and Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix
TABLE 4
Comparison of Logistic Regression Analysis of Ovarian Metastasis between Squamous Cell Carcinoma
and Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix
OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
Clinicopathological variables
Pelvic lymph node metastasis
No 1.00 0.001 1.00 0.034
Yes 12.66 2.71–59.15 4.81 1.13–20.57
Pathological endometrial invasion
No 1.00 0.011 1.00 0.008
Yes 4.19 1.39–12.69 5.43 1.56–18.97
Parametrial invasion
No NS 1.00 0.025
Yes 5.37 1.23–23.42
Clinical variables
FIGO clinical stage
Ia–IIa 1.00 ⬍0.001 NS
IIb⫹ 7.99 2.65–24.12
Tumor size
⬍30 mm NS 1.00 ⬍0.001
31–50 mm 18.06 2.18–149.72
⬎51 mm 61.62 7.16–530.29
adenocarcinoma. Although the independent significant vari- metastasis from adenocarcinoma would be different from those
ables were not different in the clinicopathological analysis, the from squamous cell carcinoma.
analysis using clinical variables indicated a difference. While In conclusion, the incidence of the ovarian metastasis of
an independent significant variable in the analysis of squamous adenocarcinoma uterine cervix was 6.3%, compared to 1.3%
cell carcinoma was clinical stage beyond IIb, a tumor size of for squamous cell carcinoma. Logistic regression revealed that
more than 30 mm was the variable in adenocarcinoma. Indeed, the independent significant variable for squamous cell carci-
the incidence of ovarian metastasis was increased in tumors noma was clinical stage beyond IIb, while the variable for
larger than 30 mm. These results suggest that the clinical adenocarcinoma was a tumor size of greater than 30 mm.
variables associated with ovarian metastasis differ between These results suggested that the incidence of ovarian metastasis
squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma and that the from cervical cancer would be rare in patients with disease
incidence of metastasis of adenocarcinoma associates more earlier than clinical stage IIa squamous cell carcinoma and with
closely with tumor size than clinical stage. small adenocarcinoma less than 30 mm in maximum diameter
The present study also revealed other characteristics of ovar- and that characteristics of ovarian metastasis would differ
ian metastasis of adenocarcinoma that are different from those between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.
of squamous cell carcinoma. One of 14 patients with metasta-
ses of squamous cell carcinoma had no other extracervical
REFERENCES
spread, whereas all with adenocarcinoma had spread. Patients
with metastases of squamous cell carcinoma had a higher mean 1. Mann WJ, Chumas J, Amalfitano T, Westermann C, Patsner B. Ovarian
age than those with adenocarcinoma. Although 66.7% of ovar- metastases from stage IB adenocarcinoma of the cervix, Cancer 1987;60:
ian metastases of adenocarcinoma were observed in both ova- 1123– 6.
ries, only 35.7% of patients with squamous cell carcinomas had 2. Tabata M, Ichinoe K, Sakuragi N, Shiina Y, Yamaguchi T, Mabuchi Y.
metastases in both. Some 40.0% of the metastases of adeno- Incidence of ovarian metastasis in patients with cancer of the uterine
cervix, Gynecol Oncol 1987;28:255– 61.
carcinoma were visible, compared to only 21.4% for squamous
3. Natsume N, Aoki Y, Kase H, Kashima K, Sugaya S, Tanaka K. Ovarian
cell carcinoma. This proportion did not change when analyzing
metastasis in stage Ib and II cervical adenocarcinoma, Gynecol Oncol
patients with metastasis in both ovaries. However, these dif- 1999;74:255– 8.
ferences were not significant because of the small number of 4. Toki N, Tsukamoto N, Kaku T, Toh N, Saito T, Kamura T, Matsukuma K,
patients with ovarian metastasis. Further studies should be Nakano H. Microscopic ovarian metastasis of the uterine cervical cancer,
conducted on a large patient sample with ovarian metastases. Gynecol Oncol 1991;41:46 –51.
The results also suggested that the characteristics of ovarian 5. Sutton GP, Bundy BN, Delgado G, Sevin BU, Creasman WT, Major FJ,
OVARIAN METASTASIS OF CERVICAL CANCER 509
Zaino R. Ovarian metastases in stage IB carcinoma of the cervix: a 10. Ishikawa H, Nakanishi T, Inoue T, Kuzuya K. Prognostic factors
Gynecologic Oncology Group study [see comments], Am J Obstet Gy- of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix, Gynecol Oncol 1999;73:
necol 1992;50 –3. 42– 6.
6. Ellsworth LR, Allen HH, Nisker JA. Ovarian function after radical hys- 11. Nakanishi T, Ishikawa H, Suzuki Y, Inoue T, Nakamura S, Kuzuya K. A
terectomy for stage IB carcinoma of cervix, Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; comparison of prognosis of pathologically staged pt1b adenocarcinoma
145:185– 8. and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix, Gynecol Oncol 2000;
7. Wu HS, Yen MS, Lai CR, Ng HT. Ovarian metastasis from cervical 79:289 –93.
carcinoma, Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;57:173– 8. 12. Beral V, Booth M. Predictions of cervical cancer incidence and mortality
8. Windbichler GH, Holzner EM, Leck GN, Meisel U, Dapunt O, Marth C. in England and Wales, Lancet 1986;1:495.
Ovarian preservation in the surgical treatment of cervical carcinoma, Am J 13. Devesa SS, Young JJ, Brinton LA, Fraumeni JJ. Recent trends in cervix
Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:963–9. uteri cancer, Cancer 1989;64:2184 –90.
9. Parente JT, Silberblatt W, Stone M. Infrequency of metastasis to ovaries 14. Larsen NS. Invasive cervical cancer rising in young white females [news],
in stage I carcinoma of the cervix, Am J Obstet Gynecol 1964;90:1362. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:6 –7.