Ref - 2 Dorin Bica PDF
Ref - 2 Dorin Bica PDF
Ref - 2 Dorin Bica PDF
com
ScienceDirect
Procedia Technology 12 (2014) 723 – 729
Abstract
Model simulations are becoming very important in dynamic power system analyses. However, no mathematical system can
exactly model a physical process. Based on mathematical models of the processes and design calculations, PC programs allow
simulation and the determination of the control system performances. This paper presents the mathematical modelling of the
steam turbine unit, developed based on the continuity equation. This model is used to determine the simulation diagram for the
steam turbine with high, medium and low pressure sections. Using Matlab/Simulink software facilities, have been simulated the
behaviour of the shaft torque, depending of the control valves opening, with uncertain parameters of the process, than the step
response of the steam turbine, with load and proportional control algorithm.
Keywords: steam turbine; mathematical modeling; power plant system; control system;
1. Introduction
The steam turbine convert stored energy of high pressure and high temperature steam into rotary energy, which is
turn converted into electrical energy by the generator. Each turbine section consists of a set of a moving blades
attached to rotor and a set of stationary vanes in which steam is accelerated to high velocity (Fig. 1).
Fin
Steam
Fout
In many cases, the steam turbine models are simplified, many intermediate variables are omitted and only map
input variables to outputs as outlined in [2,3,9,10,12,13].
In these conditions, the input-output mathematical model (the transfer function) of a steam turbine from Fig. 1
and the expression for mechanical power developed by a turbine are based on the continuity equation:
dW dU
V Fin t Fout t (1)
dt dt
where: W is the weight of steam in turbine [kg]; V – volume of turbine [m3]; U – density of steam [kg/m3];
F – steam mass flow rate [kg/s]; t – time [sec.].
Assuming the flow out of the turbine to be proportional to pressure in the turbine [9]:
F0
Fout P (2)
P0
where: P – pressure of steam in the turbine [kPa]; P0 – rated pressure; F0 – rated flow out of turbine.
With constant temperature in the turbine:
dU dP wU
(3)
dt dt wP
dP wU wU P0 dFout dFout
Fin t Fout t V V TT (4)
dt wP wP F0 dt dt
Mircea Dulau and Dorin Bica / Procedia Technology 12 (2014) 723 – 729 725
dFout
TT Fout t Fin t (5)
dt
and, after Laplace transform, the transfer function of a steam turbine unit:
Fout s 1
HT s (6)
Fin s TT s 1
P0 wU
where: TT V is the time constant [sec.].
F0 wP
The turbine torque is proportional to the steam flow rate:
Tm t k F t (7)
Depending on the turbine configuration, gas units consist of high pressure (HP), medium pressure (MP) and low
pressure (LP) turbine sections (Fig. 2). A steam turbine is equipped with sets of valves: high pressure valves (HPV),
re-heater valves (RHV) [15,17].
Boiler
CP
HPV pos
HPV
Shaft
HP MP LP G
RHV
Condenser
RH RHV pos
Fig. 2. Steam turbine configuration.
Steam enters to the HP section through the HPV and the inlet piping. The HP exhaust steam is passed through the
re-heater (RH). Re-heater section is a large heat exchanger, which has significant thermal capacity and steam mass
storage. In the reheat type turbine, the steam upon leaving the HP section returns to the boiler, where is passed
through a RH before returning to the MP section. The reheat steam flows into the MP turbine section through the
RHV and the inlet piping. The crossover piping (CP) provides a path for the steam from MP section exhaust to the
LP inlet.
Based on Fig. 2 and equation (6), result the block diagram of the turbine configuration, used for simulation
(Fig. 3), where [2,8,9,17]:
726 Mircea Dulau and Dorin Bica / Procedia Technology 12 (2014) 723 – 729
KHP
HPV
Torque
X HHP(s) HRH(s) X HLP(s) KLP ∑
Tm
Steam flow
HPV pos KMP
X
Steam pressure RHV RHV
1
H HP s (8)
THP s 1
1
H RH s (9)
TRH s
1
H LP s (10)
TLP s 1
The response of steam flow to a change in HPV opening exhibits a time constant THP due to the changing time to
the HP section. Usually, THP (0.2 ...0.3) sec. The steam flow in the MP and LP sections can change only with the
build-up of pressure in the re-heater volume. The re-heater holds a substantial amount of steam and the time
constant is TRH 5...10 sec. The steam flows into the LP sections, associated with the crossover piping, and
express an additional time constant TLP # 0.5 sec.
The MP and LP sections generate about (60…80) % of the total turbine power. The sum of the power fractions of
the various turbines sections is [9,15,17]:
K HP K LP K MP 1 (11)
If TLP << TRH, than TLP is negligible in comparison with TRH, and a simplified transfer function of the turbine
relating perturbed values of the torque and HPV position ( 'Tm 'Z HPV ) may be written as follows:
'Tm K HP 1 K HP TRH K HP s 1
(12)
'Z HPV THP s 1 THP s 1TRH s 1 THP s 1TRH s 1
If the steam turbine is of a single reheat type, the transfer function may be approximated by:
'Tm T K s 1
# RH HP (13)
'Z HPV TRH s 1
No mathematical system can exactly model a physical process. Typically, the flow F, the pressure P, the density
U etc. are experimentally measured and/or calculated, leading to the confidence intervals for time values and not
just a single value:
Mircea Dulau and Dorin Bica / Procedia Technology 12 (2014) 723 – 729 727
The values THPnom,TRHnom are called nominal values and the 'THP , 'TRH are called the maximum deviations
from the nominal values [1,6,7,11,16]. As follow, in practice, results many admissible transfer functions for this
process, one for each possible combination of THP , TRH in the given intervals.
Based on block diagram of the steam turbine (Fig. 3) and used Matlab/Simulink facilities [1,6,16], result the shaft
torque, as an output variable, depending on the control valves position, HPV and RHV, as input variables, where
100% means fully open (Fig. 4, Fig. 5).
HPV HPV
HPV pos Tm
RHV RHV
Torque
RHV pos Steam turbine
Fig. 4. Simulink block diagram of steam turbine configuration .
Fig. 5. Shaft torque to different opening positions of: (a) RHV; (b) HPV.
The HPV position (HPV pos) modulates the steam flow through the turbine for load control during normal
operation. The RHV with valve position (RHV pos) is normally used only for rapid control of turbine mechanical
power in the event of an overspeed.
Fig. 6 shows the step response of the steam turbine, described by the simplified transfer functions (12) and (13).
Some of parameters from these relationships have exact value (for example K RH 0.3 ) and some of these varies
within a specific range of values, defining the uncertain model of the process, as follow [9,15,17]:
x the nominal value of TRH 7.5 sec. and a range between (5…10) sec.;
x the nominal value of THP 0.25 sec. and a range between (0.2…0.3) sec.
To find how variations of the parameters from the nominal model affect the process, with Matlab techniques are
generated a number of random samples of the uncertain parameters and plot the corresponding step responses [1,16].
The graphics from Fig. 6 show the same type of damped step response, with similar transient performances, so, in
order to simulate the behaviour of the steam turbine is adequate to use the transfer function from relation (13).
728 Mircea Dulau and Dorin Bica / Procedia Technology 12 (2014) 723 – 729
It is consider that the steam turbine works with an isolated load, described by the transfer function:
H L s 1 (TL s) , and a proportional algorithm (controller), in feedback connection (Fig. 7).
With simulation values: TL 12 sec., TRH 7.5 sec. and K HP 0.3 it is determined the values of tuning
parameter KC, for which the speed is stable and the step response is damped or critically damped.
Based on characteristic equation of the close-loop system and values for critical damping, any positive value,
KC ! 0 , will lead to the stable response, and 0 KC 0.67 , will lead to the (critically) damped stable response
(Fig. 8).
Reference Speed
KC HT(s) HL(s)
'Z
Controller Steam turbine Load
5. Conclusions
Usually, the steam turbine transfer function is characterized by two time constants. In order to analyze the
behaviour, simulation results show that it can use a first order transfer function, despite the variation of the steam
turbine parameters.
Largely, the dynamic response of a steam turbine is influenced by two factors: entrained steam into high pressure
turbine section and the storage action in the re-heater. The dynamic response of a steam turbine can be related in
terms of changes in steam valves opening (HPV position and RHV position).
In order to meet the active power demand, inputs to the generator (steam parameters) must be controlled,
otherwise, the generator speed will vary.
One of the control key refers to establish the conditions of the stable response, with steam turbine, generator and
different type of controllers, in close-loop connection.
References
[1] Balas GJ et al. Robust control toolbox. For use with Matlab. Version 3; The MathWorks; 2006.
[2] Chaibakhsh A et al, Simulation modelling practice and theory. 2008. p. 1145–1162.
[3] Chen ZX et al. Modeling and simulation of steam turbine based on multi-modules high temperature gas-cooled reactor. IEEE 8th World
Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA). Jinan; 2010, p. 5572 – 5575.
[4] Darie S et al. Production, transport and distribution of the electrical energy. Vol. I; Cluj Napoca Technical University Pres; 2000.
[5] Dulău M. The automation of the continuous processes. Chemical and thermal processes. „Petru Maior” University Publishing House; 2004.
[6] Dulău M et al. Behavioural study of a thermal process control under uncertainties. IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality
and Testing, Robotics, Tome I; Cluj-Napoca; 2010. p. 198 – 201.
[7] Dumitrache I et al. Automatics. Romanian Academy Publishing House; 2010.
[8] Inoue T et al. A thermal power plant model for dynamic simulation of load frequency control. IEEE Power Systems Conference and
Exposition. Atlanta; 2006; p. 1442 – 1447.
[9] Kundur P. Power system stability and control. McGraw-Hill Professional; 1994.
[10] Maslo K et al. Gas turbine model using in design of heat and power stations. IEEE Power Tech Proceedings. Vol. 4; Porto; 2001.
[11] Nademi H et al. Robust controller design for governing steam turbine power generators. IEEE International Conference on Electrical
Machines and Systems. Tokyo; 2009; p. 1 – 5.
[12] Pan J et al. A new non-linear model of steam turbine unit for dynamic analysis of power system. IEEE International Conference on Power
System Technology. Hangzhou; 2010; p. 1 – 6.
[13] Soon KY et al. Validated models for gas turbines based on thermodynamic relationships. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. Vol. 26;
Issue 1; 2011; p. 270 – 281.
[14] Toganel M. Thermodynamic tables for water and steam. „Petru Maior” University; 2001.
[15] Yang T et al. Parameter identification of steam turbine speed governor system. IEEE Power and Energy Engineering Conference
(APPEEC); Shanghai; 2012; p. 1 – 8.
[16] ***. Matlab and simulink tutorial. The MathWorks; 2010; www.mathworks.com.
[17] ***. Technical documentation. Iernut thermoelectric power plant; 2010.