Lab Report
Lab Report
11/11/2018
Daniel Inemugha
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1 – OBJECTIVES.................................................................................................................... 2
CHAPTER 2 – INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 2
CHAPTER 3 – EQUIPMENT USED ......................................................................................................... 3
CHAPTER 4 – PROCEDURE AND PROTOCOL ...................................................................................... 3
4.1 Model Preparation ...................................................................................................................... 3
4.2 Main particulars for both ship and model for trawler ............................................................. 3
4.3 Applied Froude Scaling Procedure for the test ......................................................................... 4
CHAPTER 5 – RESULTS ............................................................................................................................. 4
5.1 Graph Rtm (N) VS Vm (m/s) ............................................................................................................. 6
5.2 Full Scale Effective Power Curve (Pe (kW) VS Vs (m/s)) ................................................................. 7
CHAPTER 6 – DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION ........................................................................................ 7
CHAPTER 1 – OBJECTIVES
To carry out resistance prediction using model test for a 100 m trawler in calm
water condition.
To predict total resistance of ship using ITTC 1978 Performance Prediction
Method for Single Screw Ships.
To present the result of the total resistance and the effective power for the
trawler.
To compare the resistance and powering result from extrapolation (model test).
To obtain the total resistance for model for various speeds as tabulated in Table 1
To extrapolate the total resistance of model to total resistance of ship using ITTC
1978 Performance Prediction Method for Single Screw Ships.
To obtain the effective power versus the ship speed in knots.
CHAPTER 2 – INTRODUCTION
Ship powering prediction is a substantial part of the ship design process, resistance of a
ship is the first and foremost quantity of interest when speaking of ship hydrodynamics
performance
In the resistance test the ship model was towed by the carriage and the ship model total
resistance, heave and water temperature were measured for various speeds. During the
measuring run the ship model is free to heave and pitch.
In the extrapolation of the resistance test results Froude’s hypothesis and similarity law
is followed. According to Froude’s hypothesis the resistance of a ship (or of its model)
can be split up into two independent components, one (the viscous component) being
proportional to the (frictional) resistance of a flat plate of the same length and wetted
surface area when towed at the same speed and another component RW which follows
Froude’s similarity law. The proportionality factor between the viscous component and
the flat plate resistance is called the form factor (1+k) because it corrects for the effect
of the three-dimensional hull form.
CHAPTER 3 – EQUIPMENT USED
1. Towing Tank (60m by 2m) and a 1.50m trawler scaled model made from GRP (glass
reinforced plastic) with a 1:20 scale ratio
2. Wave Maker
3. Hydraulic Workbench
4. Electrical System
5. Workstations
6. Fire detection and Prevention System
7. Auxiliary Power Generation Systems
8. MS Excel program for manual calculation
4.2 Main particulars for both ship and model for trawler
CHAPTER 5 – RESULTS
Test No Vs (m/s) Vm Rtm (N) Heave Water Ls Lm kin viscosity
(m/s) Temp (m2/s)
1 1.118034 0.25 0.16 215.593 25 30 1.5 8.93E-07
2 2.236068 0.5 0.574 215.593 25 30 1.5 8.93E-07
3 3.354102 0.75 1.356 215.593 25 30 1.5 8.93E-07
4 4.472136 1 3.108 215.593 25 30 1.5 8.93E-07
5 5.142956 1.15 6.108 215.593 25 30 1.5 8.93E-07
6 5.59017 1.25 7.492 215.593 25 30 1.5 8.93E-07
7 6.037384 1.35 9.895 215.593 25 30 1.5 8.93E-07
8 6.708204 1.5 12.957 215.593 25 30 1.5 8.93E-07
9 7.826238 1.75 30.961 215.593 25 30 1.5 8.93E-07
10 8.944272 2 63.48 215.593 25 30 1.5 8.93E-07
Rnm Cfm (x10-3) Ctm (x10-3) Cr (x10-3) Rns Cfs (x10- Rfm Rrm
3)
4.20E+05 0.005712767 0.006737355 0.0010246 2.82E+07 2.52E-03 1.36E-01 2.40E-02
8.40E+05 0.00486995 0.006042565 0.0011726 5.64E+07 2.27E-03 4.64E-01 1.10E-01
1.26E+06 0.004460657 0.006344343 0.0018837 8.46E+07 2.13E-03 9.56E-01 4.00E-01
1.68E+06 0.004200767 0.00817957 0.0039788 1.13E+08 2.05E-03 1.60E+00 1.51E+00
1.93E+06 0.00408263 0.01215494 0.0080723 1.30E+08 2.01E-03 2.06E+00 4.05E+00
2.10E+06 0.004014508 0.012619066 0.0086046 1.41E+08 1.98E-03 2.39E+00 5.10E+00
2.27E+06 0.003953133 0.014288865 0.0103357 1.52E+08 1.96E-03 2.74E+00 7.15E+00
2.52E+06 0.003871367 0.01515554 0.0112842 1.69E+08 1.93E-03 3.32E+00 9.64E+00
2.94E+06 0.003756233 0.026606537 0.0228503 1.97E+08 1.89E-03 4.38E+00 2.66E+01
3.36E+06 0.003660601 0.041766337 0.0381057 2.26E+08 1.86E-03 5.58E+00 5.79E+01
10
8
Rtm
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
Vm
5.2 Full Scale Effective Power Curve (Pe (kW) VS Vs (m/s))
Vs (m/s) Pe (kW)
1.118034 0.863038
2.236068 6.713132
3.354102 26.06925
4.472136 89.87576
5.142956 222.9006
5.59017 300.1466
6.037384 436.9324
6.708204 642.7711
7.826238 1884.57
8.944272 4516.142
Although the temperature of the towing tank water was fluctuating around 25 degrees, it
was assumed to be 25 degrees throughout.
From the result, we saw that the full scale effective power curve was similar to the curves
Pe Vs Vs in the theories. This further validated this experiment.