Position and Competency Profile: Job Summary

POSITION AND COMPETENCY PROFILE PCP No.
_________ Revision Code: 00
Department of Education
Postion Title Teacher I Salary Grade 11
Parenthetical Title
Office Unit Effectivity Date
Reports to Principal/ School Heads Page/s
Position Supervised
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education Bachelor of Secondary Education/Mathematics
Experience 5yrs & 2 mos.
Eligibility LET
Trainings None required
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education BSE/BSEEd/College Graduate with education units (18-21), MA units 18 units
Experience
Eligibility PBET/LET Passers
Trainings In-Service training/RPMS ENHANCEMENT
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
Name of Employee: JANICE A. HUGO Name of Rater: BELEN S. CASAS

Position: TEACHER I Position: SCHOOL PRINCIPAL
Review Period: Mar-18 Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Servic
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATIO
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Result

Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T Ave.
Basic Education 1. Teaching- 1.1 Prepared daily June 2017- 20% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding
Services Learning lesson plans / Daily Apr. 2018 • 95% - 100% of all lesson logs had all the • 95%-100%of the students got quarterly • 95% - 100% of all lesson logs were
Process (40%) Logs of activities complete parts (Objectives, Content, grade of 75% and above submitted for checking before the checking
including appropriate Learning Resources, Procedures, schedule to the school head
adequate and updated Remarks & Reflections)
instructional materials
in Science within the 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory
rating period. (Note: •85% - 94% of all lesson logs had all the • 85%-94%of the students got quarterly • 85% - 94% of all lesson logs were
applicable for 2 years complete parts (Objectives, Content, grade of 75% and above submitted for checking before the checking
and below teaching Learning Resources, Procedures, schedule to the school head
experience and for Remarks & Reflections)
those teachers who are
3 yrs and above 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory
teaching experience • 75%-84% of all lesson logs had all the • 75%-84%of the students got quarterly • 75% - 84% of all lesson logs were
opted to prepare LPs) complete parts (Objectives, Content, grade of 75% and above submitted for checking before the checking
Learning Resources, Procedures, schedule to the school head
Remarks & Reflections)
2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory
• 51%-74% of all lesson logs had all the • 51%-74%of the students got quarterly • 51% - 74% of all lesson logs were
complete parts (Objectives, Content, grade of 75% and above submitted for checking before the checking
1 - Poor 1 - Poor 1 - Poor
#RSH#
Weight
per KRA
• 50% and below of all lesson logs had all • 50% and below of the students got • 50% and below of all lesson logs were
the complete parts (Objectives, Content, quarterly grade of 75% and above submitted for checking before the checking
1.2 Prepared TOS in June 2017- 10% 5 - Outstanding 5-Outstanding 5-Outstanding

Science 9 during Apr. 2018 * prepared 95% - 100% of the TOS during 95% - 100% of the TOS validated by the Submitted on or before the deadline
quarterly exams to quarterly exams in a year round school head
provide standard and
valid questionnaire to 4- Very Satisfactorily 4-Very satisfactory 4- (Very Satisfactory)
students in measuring * prepared 85% - 94% of the TOS during 85%-94% of the TOS validated by the Submitted one day after the deadline
their academic quarterly exams in a year round school head
performance.
3-Satisfactorily 3-Satisfactorily 3-Satisfactorily
prepared 75% -84% of the TOS during Submitted two days after the deadline
qaurterly exams in a year round 75%-84% of the TOS validated by the
school head
2-Unsatisfactorily 2-Unsatisfactorily 2 - Unsatisfactorily
prepared 51% - 74% of the TOS during 51% -74% of the TOS validated by the Submitted three days after the deadline
quarterly exams in a year round school head
1-Poor 1-Poor 1-Poor
prepared 50% and below of the TOS in a Submitted a week after the deadline
year round 50% and below of the TOS validated by
the school head
1.3 Monitored students' June 2017- 10% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding
daily attendance to Mar. 2018 95%-100% of student's attendance 95%-100% of the students promoted • Report of progress of pupils were given to
ensure 100% promotion completely monitored and evaluated with parents within 15 working days after the
rate the following evidences: (SF 2, attendance submission of grades from subject teachers
notebook, weekly attendance sheet)
4- Very Satisfactorily 4- Very Satisfactorily 4 - Very Satisfactory

95%-100% of student's attendance 85%-94% of the students promoted • Report of progress of pupils were given to
completely monitored and evaluated with parents within 20 working days after the
the following evidences: (SF 2, attendance submission of grades from subject teachers
#RSH#
Weight
per KRA
3-Satisfactorily 3-Satisfactorily 3 - Satisfactory

2-Unsatisfactorily 2-Unsatisfactorily 2 - Unsatisfactory
1-Poor 1-Poor 1 - Poor

95%-100% of student's attendance 50% and below of the students • Report of progress of pupils were given to
completely monitored and evaluated with promoted parents within 35 or later working days after
the following evidences: (SF 2, attendance the submission of grades from subject
notebook, weekly attendance sheet) teachers
#RSH#
Weight
per KRA
2. 2.1 Monitored and June 2017- 10% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding

Pupils/Student evaluated pupils/ Mar. 2018 95% - 100% of the students got the • Report of progress of pupils were given to
Outcomes (30%) students’ progress • Prepared and presented all of the passing grade in all subjects parents within 15 working days after the
following with complete record:class submission of grades from subject teachers
record, periodic exam corrected test
papers, periodic exam TOS, periodic
exam item analysis
4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory

Prepared and presented 3 of the following 85%-94% of the students got a passing • Report of progress of pupils were given to
with complete record: class record, grade in all subjects parents within 20 working days after the
periodic exam corrected test papers, submission of grades from subject teachers
periodic exam TOS, and item analysis
3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory



Not conducted even one summative test 50% and below of the students got a • Report of progress of pupils were given to
in a grading period passing grade in all subjects parents within 35 or later working days after
the submission of grades from subject
teachers
#RSH#
Weight
per KRA
2.2 Conducted June 2017- 10% 5 - Outstanding 5-Outstanding 5-Outstanding

remediation to improve Mar. 2018 • Remediation is offered to 95% - 100% of 95% -100% of non readers improved
performance indicators slow learners their performance at the end of the Had accurate, complete and comprehensive
of students from June school year records of student's progress during the
to March 2018. First Quarter
4 - Very Satisfactory 4-Very satisfactory 4-Very Satisfactorily
• Remediation is offered to 85% to 94% 85%-94% of non-readers improved their
slow learners performance at the end of the school Had accurate, complete and comprehensive
year records of student's progress during the
Second Quarter
3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactorily 3-Satisfactorily
• Remediation is offered to 70-84% who 70%-84% of non-readers improved their Had accurate, complete and comprehensive
need it performance at the end of the school records of student's progress during the
year Third Quarter
2 - Unsatisfactory 2-Unsatisfactorily 2 -Unsatisfactorily

• Remediation is offered to 51%-74% who 51%-74% of non-readers improved their Had accurate, complete and comprehensive
need it performance at the end of the school records of student's progress during the
year fourth Quarter
1 - Poor 1-Poor 1-Poor
• Remediation is offered to 54% and below 50% and below of non-readers improved Had accurate, complete and comprehensive
who need it their performance at the end of the records of student's progress after the fourth
school year Quarter
2.3 Conducted home June 2017- 10% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding
visitation to students Mar. 2018
who are at risk of visited 95%-100% of the students who are 95% -100% of the students in a class Conduct home visitation 4 times every
dropping out and at risk of dropping out. promoted quarter
students with problem 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory
regarding academic
performance. visited 85% - 94% of students who are at 85-94% of the students in a class Conduct home visitation 3 times every
risk of dropping out promoted quarter
visited 75% - 84% of students who are at 75% - 84% of the students in a class Conduct home visitation 2 times every
risk of dropping out promoted quarter
#RSH#
dropping out and
students with problem
regarding academic
performance.
Weight
per KRA

visited 51% - 74% of students who are at 51%-74% of the students in a class
risk of dropping out promoted Conduct home visitation once every quarter
Conduct home visitation once a year
visited 50% and below of students who 50% and below of the students in a
are at risk of dropping out class promoted
3. Community 3.1 Conducted June 2017- 5% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding
Involvement HomeRoom PTA Mar. 2018 Conducted 5 Parents Meeting in a year 95% - 100% Attendance / Participation
(15%) meeting every quarter 95%-100% of the expected meetings are
to feedback the parents conducted on time
and guardians 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory
regarding student's Conducted 4 Parents Meeting in a year 85%-95% Attendance / Participation 85%-94% of the expected meetings are
performance and conducted on time
school plans and
development to 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory
maintain good relations Conducted 3 Parents Meeting in a year 75% - 84% Attendance / Participation 75%-84% of the expected meetings are
towards stakeholders. conducted on time
Conducted 2 Parents Meeting in a year 51% - 74% of planned meetings 51%-75% of the expected meetings are
conducted with minimal results conducted on time
Conducted once to two times Parents 50% and below of the planned meetings
50% and below of the expected meetings
Meeting in a year conducted with no result
are conducted on time
3.2 Visited at least 5 June 2017- 5% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 4 4 4 4
parents of students Mar. 2018 Conduct home visitation 4 times every
needing academic Visited 5 parents of identified slow 95% -100% accomplishment of set quarter
monitoring/follow-up learners quarterly with set of agreements visits with successful intervention/s
quarterly. duly signed by the parents implemented
Conduct home visitation 3 times every
Visited 4 parents of identified slow 85% - 94% accomplishment of visits
quarter
learners quarterly with set of agreements with partial success in implementation of
duly signed by the parents interventions
#RSH#
needing academic
monitoring/follow-up
quarterly.

Weight
per KRA
Visited 3 parents of identified slow 75% - 84%% accomplishment of visits Conduct home visitation 2 times every
learners quarterly with set of agreements with suggested planned interventions quarter
duly signed by the parents
Visited 2 parents of identified slow 51% - 74% accomplishments of visits Conduct home visitation once every quarter
learners quarterly with set of agreements with planned interventions
Visited 1 parents of identified slow 50% and below accomplishments with Conduct home visitation once a year
learners quarterly with set of agreements no interventions
3.3 Participated and June 2016- 5% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding
supported atleast 5 Mar. 2017 Participated 5 or more local activities • Organized/Initiated/Served as • Report of participation was submitted to
local activities in the Facilitator/Resource the school head within 5 working days from
community to maintain Person/Coordinator/Chairman the date of the project/event/activity
strong relationships
with the community and 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory
stakeholders. (Civic
parade, clean-up drive, Participated 4 local activities • Served as steering committee • Report of participation was submitted to
tree planting activities, member the school head within 10 working days from
fiesta and others) the date of the project/event/activity

participated 3 local activities • Served as staff • Report of participation was submitted to
the school head within 15 working days from
the date of the project/event/activity

participated 2 local activities • Attended/Participated any local • Report of participation was submitted to
activities the school head within 20 working days
from the date of the project/event/activity

participated 1 local activity only • Did not attend/initiate/ participate in • Report of participation was submitted to
co-curricular/ local activities the school head within 25 working days or
later from the date of the
project/event/activity
4. Professional 4.1 Attended atleast 2 June 2017- 5% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding

#RSH# Growth and trainings, seminars, Mar. 2018
Development workshops and
(15%) conferences to
Weight
per KRA
4. Professional 4.1 Attended atleast 2 June 2017- 5%
Growth and trainings, seminars, Mar. 2018 Attended 5 or more trainings/seminars • Attended • Done attending
Development workshops and and workshops a year round seminars/trainings/workshops in national seminars/trainings/workshops in school,
(15%) conferences to level and international level district, division, regional and national level
enhance teaching within 4 months before the end of the school
performance and year
professional growth.
Attended 4 trainings/seminars and • Attended • Done attending
workshops a year round seminars/trainings/workshops in regional seminars/trainings/workshops in school,
& division level district, division, regional and national level
within 3 months before the end of the school
year

workshops a year round seminars/trainings/workshops in district seminars/trainings/workshops in school,
level district, division, regional and national level
within 2 months before the end of the school
year
workshops a year round seminars/trainings/workshops in school seminars/trainings/workshops in school,
level district, division, regional and national level
1 - Poor within
1 - Poor1 month before the end of the school
1 - Poor year
Attended 1 training/seminar and • Never attended any • Never attended
workshops a year round seminars/trainings/workshops seminars/trainings/workshops in school,
district, division, regional and national level
within the end of the school year
4.2 June 2017- 5% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding
Initiated/Participated at Mar. 2018 • Attended/initiated/ participated in 5 or • Organized/Initiated/Served as • Report of participation was submitted to
least 5 and above in more co-curricular/ school activities Facilitator/Resource the school head within 5 working days from
co-curricular/school Person/Coordinator/Chairman the date of the project/event/activity
activities from June to
March 2017 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory
#RSH#
4.2 June 2017- 5%
Initiated/Participated at Mar. 2018 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Result
least 5 and above in Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES
co-curricular/school TIMELINE
per KRA
activities from June to QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T Ave.
March 2017
• Attended/initiated/ participated in 4 co- • Served as steering committee • Report of participation was submitted to
curricular/ school activities member the school head within 10 working days from
• Attended/initiated/ participated in 3 co- • Served as staff • Report of participation was submitted to
curricular/ school activities the school head within 15 working days from

• Attended/initiated/ participated in 1-2 co- • Attended/Participated • Report of participation was submitted to
curricular/ school activities the school head within 20 working days
from the date of the project/event/activity
• Never attended/initiated/ participated in • Did not attend/initiate/ participate in • Report of participation was submitted to
co-curricular/ school activities co-curricular/ school activities the school head within 25 working days or
later from the date of the
project/event/activity
4.3 Submitted require June 2017- 5% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding
reports on time Mar. 2018 All the require reports submitted like the All the require reports submitted like the • 95% - 100% of all the required reports
following: SF 2, SF1, FORM 138, Form following: SF 2, SF1, FORM 138, Form were submitted for checking before the
137, Form 48, Narative Report, Form 86, 137, Form 48, Narative Report, Form 86, checking schedule to the school head
SF 5 SF 5
One of the required reports submitted is One of the required reports submitted is • 85% - 94% of all the required reports were
missing. missing. submitted for checking before the checking
schedule to the school head

2 out of the required reports submitted is 2 out of the required reports submitted is • 75% - 84% of all the required reports were
missing. missing. submitted for checking before the checking

3of the required reports submitted is 3of the required reports submitted is • 51% - 74% of all the required reports were
lacking. lacking. submitted for checking before the checking
#RSH#
Weight
per KRA

• 50% and below of all the required reports
4-5 of the required reports submitted is 4-5 of the required reports submitted is were submitted for checking before the
lacking lacking checking schedule to the school head
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned
Ratee: Approving Officer:

JANICE A. HUGO BELEN S. CASAS
Teacher SCHOOL PRINCIPAL
#RSH#
EVALUATION
Rating SCORE*
#RSH#
Rating SCORE*
#RSH#
Rating SCORE*
#RSH#
Rating SCORE*
#RSH#
Rating SCORE*
#RSH#
Rating SCORE*
0.2
#RSH#
Rating SCORE*
#RSH#
Rating SCORE*
#RSH#
Rating SCORE*
#RSH#
Rating SCORE*
CASAS
RINCIPAL
#RSH#
COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES

improve performance. Examples may include doing something better,
Self-Management faster, at alower cost, more efficiently; or improving quality, costumer
satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
1 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development. 4
Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and Teamwork
2 4
purposive and takes into account personal goals and values 4 1 4
Willingly does his/her share of responsibilty.
congruent to that of the organization.
2 Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal
Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by 4 accomplishment across the organization 4 4
3
higher goals
Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through gantt charts, checklists, 3
4 4 4
etc.) to achieve goals. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
5 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others 4 4 4
Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5
Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across
Professionalism and Ethics 4
organizations to accomplish organizational goals and objectives.
Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Service Orientation
Conduct and Ethical Standards for public officials and employee (RA 1
1 6713). Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
4 4
2
Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into
2 4 Takes personal responsibilty for dealing with and/or correcting costumer 3.8
account the impact of his/her actions and decisions. 4 service issues and concerns 4
Maintains professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of 3 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women
3
attendance and punctuality, good grooming and communication. 4 empowerment. 4
4
Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates & strategies
4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs.
4 based on DepEd strategies and directions. 4
Acts with a sense pf urgency and responsibility to meet the 5
Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified
5 organization's needs, improves systems and help others improve
procedures that will further enhance service delivery.
their effectiveness. 4 3
Result Focus Innovation
1 Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions.
Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the
1 Fosters new ideas, processes, and suggests bettter ways to do things (cost
time.
4 and/or operational efficiency). 4
Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work 2 Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously focuses on
2
methods by placing organizational needs before personal needs. 4 improving personal productivity to create higher value and results. 4
Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to 3
standard operating procedures correctly and consistently. Able to
Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original
3 produce very satisfactoy quality of work in terms of 4 4
ideas or solutions.
usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision
required.
4 4
Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste 4
Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
4 or inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting organization.
goals set. 4 4
5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to
4 ability to succeed with minimal resources. 4
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrates
DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form -Teachers
CORE SKILLS Computer / ICT Skills
Oral Communication Prepares basic compositions ( e.g., letters, reports, spreadsheets and
1 graphic presentations using Word Processing and Excel. 4
Identifies different computer parts, turns the computer on/off, and work on
1 Follows instructions accurately. 4.2 a given task with acceptable speed and accuracy and connects computer 4
4 2 peripherals ( e.g., printers, modems, multi-media projectors, etc.) 4
2 Expresses self clearly, fluently and articulately. 4 3 Prepares simple presentations using Powerpoint. 4
Utilizes technologies to : access information to enhance professional
3 Uses appropriate medium for the message. productivity, assists in conducting research and communicate through local
4 4 and global professional networks. 4
4 Recommends appropriate and updated technology to enhance productivity
Adjust communication style to others. 4 5 and professional practice. 4
5 Guides discussions between and among peers to meet an objective. 5
Written Communication 4
Knows the different written business communication formats used in
1 the DepEd. 4
Writes routine correspondence/communications, narrative and
descriptive report based on ready available information data with 4.2
2 minimal spelling or grammatical error/s (e.g. Memos, minutes, etc.) 4 OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS
Secures information from required references (i.e., Directories,
3 schedules, notices, instructions) for specific purposes. 4 CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 4.02
Self-edits words, numbers, phonetic notation and content, if
4 necessary. 5
Demonstrates clarity, fluency, impact, conciseness, and effectiveness
5 in his/her written communications. 4 OVERALL RATING 4.02
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrates
Note: These ratings can be used for the developmental plans of the employee.
DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form - For Teachers

PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION
Final Performance Results Rating
Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives

4.17
Employee-Superior Agreement
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.
Name of Employee: LYN J. ESPINOSA Name of Superior: DESIDERIO A. LOGDONIO

Signature: Signature:
Date: Date:
PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention)
1. Prepared daily lesson log

with five parts and had partial Teaching methods and strategies elicited 51% to 79% Teachers should conduct at least three
description on what to do. interaction from the class. classroom-based action plan. S.Y. 2018 - 2019 Action Plan
2. 80% - 95% of students were Prepare the Instructional Materials suited for
guided in the observation of each subject to attain 100% interaction from
classroom rules and guidelines. Must conduct Action Research the students. S.Y. 2018 - 2019 Instructional Materials (IM's)
3. Students' portfolio contents, 80% of the students got an MPS of 75% and Prepare various tools for class remediation
85% - 99% is accomplished. above (CNR) in every unmaterred competency. S.Y. 2018 - 2019 Various Assessment
LYN J. ESPINOSA JUNELLY G. ARCITE DESIDERIO A. LOGDONIO

Ratee Rater Approving Officer
DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form -For Teacher |

Position and Competency Profile: Job Summary

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Position and Competency Profile: Job Summary

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Position and Competency Profile: Job Summary

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

POSITION AND COMPETENCY PROFILE PCP No.

_________ Revision Code: 00

Name of Employee: JANICE A. HUGO Name of Rater: BELEN S. CASAS

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Result

1 - Poor 1 - Poor 1 - Poor

1.2 Prepared TOS in June 2017- 10% 5 - Outstanding 5-Outstanding 5-Outstanding

4- Very Satisfactorily 4- Very Satisfactorily 4 - Very Satisfactory

3-Satisfactorily 3-Satisfactorily 3 - Satisfactory

1-Poor 1-Poor 1 - Poor

2. 2.1 Monitored and June 2017- 10% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding

4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory

3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory

2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory

1 - Poor 1 - Poor 1 - Poor

2.2 Conducted June 2017- 10% 5 - Outstanding 5-Outstanding 5-Outstanding

2 - Unsatisfactory 2-Unsatisfactorily 2 -Unsatisfactorily

2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Result

3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory

2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory

1 - Poor 1 - Poor 1 - Poor

4. Professional 4.1 Attended atleast 2 June 2017- 5% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding

3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory

2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory

3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory

2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory

1 - Poor 1 - Poor 1 - Poor

Ratee: Approving Officer:

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES

DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form - For Teachers

Final Performance Results Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives

Name of Employee: LYN J. ESPINOSA Name of Superior: DESIDERIO A. LOGDONIO

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

1. Prepared daily lesson log

LYN J. ESPINOSA JUNELLY G. ARCITE DESIDERIO A. LOGDONIO

DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form -For Teacher |

You might also like