GE's Talent Machine The CEO Making v1
GE's Talent Machine The CEO Making v1
GE's Talent Machine The CEO Making v1
EMBA 2018
GE has been running a surplus since 1956. Cordiner built the first corporate university,
which is also seen as a strategic learning industry called Crotonville. Given the amount of
management tasks and detailed information about the organization that was needed to
succeed, they spent about 10% of their profits to educate management. GE designed a
process that enabled employees to self-assess their strengths and weaknesses regarding
opportunities. The results of the process were determined for supervisors to review and
identify the most appropriate employee based on their strengths and weaknesses. After
Fred Borsch became CEO, he explained that the manager's materials should be shared
among all departments and parts of the company. His goal was to ensure a balanced
Scales of experience and talent in all departments, and to establish a well-managed
company. This provided a model for a successful company.
Charles Coffin established merit and helped pave the foundation for the years to come.
The company encouraged promotions from within, which in turn offered the company's
investments in employees, demonstrating interest in the success of employees and the
company. While Jack Welch was CEO, he used a compensation philosophy that included
incentive options and eligibility for higher-paying salaries. This reinforces employee
dedication and desire to achieve personal and corporate goals. When rewards are
distributed, they reflect the potential for realism and build trust in company practices
within employees.
Harnessing the capacity to mainstream human resources (GE) practices and policies is
indeed possible. GE is constantly looking for ways to increase the overall performance of
diverse business centres located around the world. Achieving the required focus on
human capital with slowly defined skills is at the forefront. Key elements of GE's human
resources practices include (1) “Vitality curves” (2) “bottom-up initiative” (3) annual
employee surveys and (4) a stronger focus on professional integration of human
resources. All four elements can be used as a basic basis for HR programs. The only
exception to easy application is Dynamic Curves. GE's long-standing taxonomy curve
has been one of the most controversial elements in HR practices, at least for outsiders
Mainstreaming GE's HR practices is one issue, but the conversion part is more difficult.
In order to successfully transfer practices across cultures, industries and companies, an
accredited organization must conduct compliance assessments. GE's human resource
practices have evolved through years of business diversification that ultimately requires a
redesigned organizational culture. In order to achieve this, the institution must commit to
its human resources programs and allow it to initiate and lead the required cultural
changes.
Jeff Immelt started from the bottom and worked his way. He was recruited in 25 years of
Harvard by Dennis Dammerman. For the first time, the company has embarked on a
leadership path that includes many GE companies. He was then appointed Regional Sales
Manager for GE Plastics in Dallas, Texas. Over the next few years, he had duties as
Product Manager, Sales Manager and Global Marketing Manager. In each of these
positions, he gained a great deal of knowledge and skills that eventually led him to the
highest position in GE.
The training and development program can play a strategic role in ensuring that
employees have effective tools to perform their duties efficiently. The comprehensive
training and development program help discuss the knowledge, skills and attitudes
necessary to achieve organizational goals and create a competitive advantage. From the
beginning of GE, leadership has placed great emphasis on developing and training its
employees in the hope of improving upcoming talent. The development programs of the
past and those of GE's future allow the company to access a wide range of talent to
acquire and develop for the enterprise. GE has taken a major step in the search and
recruitment of outstanding students from some MBA programs at leading universities.
The leadership at GE has introduced several training programs such as the Edison
Engineering Development program (EEDP), Financial Management Program (FMP),
2
Information Management Leadership Program (IMLP), Risk Management Leadership
Program (RMLP) and other such programs. GE’s leadership is committed to the
“development of management talent a high priority” which helps to contribute to the
effective success of the organization. This type of commitment on GE’s behalf creates an
effective relational bond between training, development strategies and organizational
performances as well as job satisfaction which is needed to meet organizational goals.
When considering employees training and development, an organization should consider
its return on its investment from employee training. Investing in human resources through
training and management development improves individual employee capabilities and
organizational capabilities. maintain that organizations can achieve a sustainable
competitive advantage through people Human capital is valuable resource that improves
the efficiency or effectiveness of the organization. An organization should also consider
the benefits of a training program such as improved productivity, improved quality of
service and time savings. GE has capitalized on the benefit of training and development
by producing some of its top manager through their training programs.
Conclusion
During the process of examining the unique elements of GE's training and development
program, we discussed the ways in which GE continually produces several key well-
qualified candidates, develops policies and practices conducive to corporate success, and
their ability to use training and development as a strategic tool for achieving
organizational goals. Several key elements of GE's human capital operations are
discussed in detail in several sections of this document. One of the key factors that clearly
brings all the elements together, GE realized that a change in its organizational culture
was needed early rather than later. Once this need was identified, cultural change served
as the basis for all future initiatives as GE implemented changes aimed at achieving the
desired results. Developing the ability to change its culture and achieve its desired
strategic goals is one of the key features that distinguish GE from its competitors.