CHARGEABLE GAINS, PART 1

RELATED LINKS
 Chargeable gains, part 2
 Student Accountant hub
This two-part article is relevant to candidates sitting F6 (UK) in the period 1 September 2016 to 31 March 2017, and
is based on tax legislation as it applies to the tax year 2015–16 (Finance Act 2015 and Finance (No 2) Act 2015).

SCOPE OF CAPITAL GAINS TAX (CGT)

CGT is charged when there is a chargeable disposal of a chargeable asset by a chargeable person.

A chargeable disposal includes part disposals and the gift of assets. However, the transfer of an asset upon death is
an exempt disposal. A person who inherits an asset will take it over at its value at the time of death.
Example 1
On 19 May 2001, Jorge purchased an acre of land for £20,200. He died on 20 June 2015, and the land was inherited
by his son William. On that date, the land was valued at £71,600.
 The transfer of the land on Jorge’s death is an exempt disposal.
 William will take over the land with a base cost of £71,600.
All forms of property are chargeable assets unless exempt. The most important exempt assets as far as F6 (UK) is
concerned are:

 Certain chattels (see later)

 Motor cars
 UK Government securities (gilts)
In determining whether or not an individual is chargeable to CGT, it is necessary to consider their residence status.
Example 2
Explain when a person will be treated as resident in the UK for a particular tax year, and state how a person’s
residence status establishes whether or not they are liable to CGT.
Subject to not meeting any of the automatic non–resident tests, the following people will be treated as resident:

 A person who is in the UK for 183 days or more during a tax year.
 A person whose only home is in the UK.
 A person who carries out full time work in the UK.
A person can also be treated as resident if they have more UK ties than is permitted according to the number of days
they are in the UK during a tax year.
A person is liable to CGT on the disposal of assets during any tax year in which they are resident in the UK.

BASIC COMPUTATION

For individuals, the basic CGT computation is quite straightforward.

Example 3
Andy sold a factory on 15 February 2016 for £320,000. The factory was purchased on 24 January 1997 for £164,000,
and was extended at a cost of £37,000 during March 2007. During May 2009, the roof of the factory was replaced at
a cost of £24,000 following a fire.
Andy incurred legal fees of £3,600 in connection with the purchase of the factory, and legal fees of £5,400 in
connection with the disposal.
Andy’s taxable gain for 2015–16 is:

£
 £

Disposal proceeds 320,000

Cost (164,000)

Enhancement expenditure (37,000)

Incidental costs
(3,600 + 5,400) (9,000)

Chargeable gain 110,000

Annual exempt amount (11,100)

Taxable gain 98,900

 The factory extension is enhancement expenditure because it has added to the value of the factory.
 The replacement of the roof is not enhancement expenditure, being in the nature of a repair.
 Note that the standardised term ‘chargeable gain’ refers to the gain before deducting the annual exempt
amount, and the term ‘taxable gain’ refers to the gain after deducting the annual exempt amount.

CAPITAL LOSSES

Capital losses are set off against any chargeable gains arising in the same tax year, even if this results in the annual
exempt amount being wasted. Any unrelieved capital losses are carried forward, but in future years they are only set
off to the extent that the annual exempt amount is not wasted.
Example 4
For the tax year 2015–16, Nim has chargeable gains of £18,000. He has unused capital losses of £16,700 brought
forward from the tax year 2014–15.
Nim’s taxable gains for 2015–16 are:

Chargeable gains 18,000

Capital losses brought forward (6,900)

Chargeable gains 11,100

Annual exempt amount (11,100)

Taxable gains Nil

 The set off of the brought forward capital losses is restricted to £6,900 (18,000 – 11,100) so that chargeable
gains are reduced to the amount of the annual exempt amount.
  Nim therefore has capital losses carried forward of £9,800 (16,700 – 6,900).

RATES OF CAPITAL GAINS TAX

The rate of CGT is linked to the level of a person’s taxable income. Taxable gains are taxed at a lower rate of 18%
where they fall within the basic rate tax band of £31,785, and at a higher rate of 28% where they exceed this
threshold. Remember that the basic rate band is extended if a person pays personal pension contributions or makes
a gift aid donation.

CGT is collected as part of the self-assessment system, and is due in one amount on 31 January following the tax
year. Therefore a CGT liability for the tax year 2015–16 will be payable on 31 January 2017. Payments on account
are not required in respect of CGT.
Example 5
For the tax year 2015–16, Adam has a salary of £40,600, and during the year he made net personal pension
contributions of £4,400. On 15 June 2015, Adam sold an antique table and this resulted in a chargeable gain of
£17,600.
For the tax year 2015–16, Bee has a trading profit of £60,000. On 20 August 2015, she sold an antique vase and this
resulted in a chargeable gain of £19,100.

For the tax year 2015–16, Chester has a salary of £36,600. On 25 October 2015, he sold an antique clock and this
resulted in a chargeable gain of £23,900.
Adam
Adam’s taxable income is £30,000 (40,600 less the personal allowance of 10,600). His basic rate tax band is
extended to £37,285 (31,785 + 5,500 (4,400 x 100/80)), of which £7,285 (37,285 – 30,000) is unused.
Adam’s taxable gain of £6,500 (17,600 less the annual exempt amount of 11,100) is fully within the unused basic rate
tax band, so his CGT liability for 2015–16 is therefore £1,170 (6,500 at 18%).
Bee
Bee’s taxable income is £49,400 (60,000 – 10,600), so all of her basic rate tax band has been used. The CGT liability
for 2015–16 on her taxable gain of £8,000 (19,100 – 11,100) is therefore £2,240 (8,000 at 28%).
Chester
Chester’s taxable income is £26,000 (36,600 – 10,600), so £5,785 (31,785 – 26,000) of his basic rate tax band is
unused. The CGT liability for 2015–16 on Chester’s taxable gain of £12,800 (23,900 – 11,100) is therefore:

5,785 at 18% 1,041

7,015 at 28% 1,964

3,005

In each case, the CGT liability will be due on 31 January 2017.

ENTREPRENEURS’ RELIEF

A reduced CGT rate of 10% applies if a disposal qualifies for entrepreneurs’ relief. This rate applies regardless of the
level of a person’s taxable income. Entrepreneurs’ relief can be claimed when an individual disposes of a business or
a part of a business as follows:

 A disposal of the whole or part of a business run as a sole trader. Relief is only available in respect of
chargeable gains arising from the disposal of assets in use for the purpose of the business. This will exclude
chargeable gains arising from investments.
  The disposal of shares in a trading company where an individual has at least a 5% shareholding in the company
and is also an officer or an employee of the company. Provided the limited company is a trading company, there
is no restriction to the amount of relief if it holds non-trading assets such as investments.
The relief covers the first £10 million of qualifying gains that a person makes during their lifetime. Gains in excess of
the £10 million limit are taxed as normal at the 18% or 28% rates.

The qualifying conditions must be met for a period of one year prior to the date of disposal in order for entrepreneurs’
relief to be available.
Example 6
On 15 October 2015, the four shareholders of Alphabet Ltd, an unquoted trading company, all sold their shares in the
company. Alphabet Ltd has a share capital of 100,000 £1 ordinary shares.
Aloi had been the managing director of Alphabet Ltd since the company’s incorporation on 1 January 2005. She had
held 60,000 shares since 1 January 2005.

Bon had been the sales director of Alphabet Ltd since 1 February 2015, having not previously been an employee of
the company. She had held 25,000 shares since 1 February 2015.
Cherry had never been an employee or a director of Alphabet Ltd. She had held 12,000 shares since 27 July 2008.
Dee had been an employee of Alphabet Ltd since 1 May 2006. She had held 3,000 shares since 20 June 2007.

 Aloi’s disposal qualified for entrepreneurs’ relief because she was a director of Alphabet Ltd, had a shareholding
of 60% (60,000/100,000 x 100), and these qualifying conditions were met for one year prior to the date of
disposal.
 Bon’s disposal did not qualify for entrepreneurs’ relief because she only acquired her shareholding and became
a director on 1 February 2015. The qualifying conditions were therefore not met for one year prior to the date of
disposal.
 Cherry’s disposal did not qualify for entrepreneurs’ relief because she was not an officer or an employee of
Alphabet Ltd.
 Dee’s disposal did not qualify for entrepreneurs’ relief because her shareholding of 3% (3,000/100,000 x 100)
was less than the minimum required holding of 5%.

Example 7
On 25 January 2016, Michael sold a 30% shareholding in Green Ltd, an unquoted trading company. The disposal
resulted in a chargeable gain of £800,000. Michael had owned the shares since 1 March 2009, and was an employee
of the company from that date until the date of disposal.
He has taxable income of £8,000 for the tax year 2015–16.
Michael’s CGT liability for 2015–16 is:

Chargeable gain 800,000

Annual exempt amount (11,100)

788,900

Capital gains tax:

788,900 at 10% 78,890

Although chargeable gains that qualify for entrepreneurs’ relief are always taxed at a rate of 10%, they must be taken
into account when establishing which rate applies to other chargeable gains. Chargeable gains qualifying for
entrepreneurs’ relief therefore reduce the amount of any unused basic rate tax band.
 The annual exempt amount and any capital losses should be initially deducted from those chargeable gains that do
not qualify for entrepreneurs’ relief. This approach will save CGT at either 18% or 28%, compared to just 10% if used
against chargeable gains that do qualify for relief.

There are several ways of presenting computations involving such a mix of gains, but the simplest approach is to
keep gains qualifying for entrepreneurs’ relief and other gains separate.
Example 8
On 30 September 2015, Mika sold a business that she had run as a sole trader since 1 January 2009. The disposal
resulted in the following chargeable gains:

Goodwill 260,000

Freehold office building 370,000

Freehold warehouse 170,000

800,000

The warehouse had never been used by Mika for business purposes.
Mika has taxable income of £4,000 for the tax year 2015–16. She has unused capital losses of £28,000 brought
forward from the tax year 2014–15.
Mika’s CGT liability for 2015–16 is:

Gains qualifying for entrepreneurs’ relief

Goodwill 260,000

Freehold office building 370,000

630,000

Other gains

Freehold warehouse 170,000

Capital losses
brought forward (28,000)

142,000

Annual exempt amount (11,100)

130,900
 £

Capital gains tax: 630,000 at 10% 63,000

130,900 at 28% 36,652

Tax liability 99,652

 The capital losses and the annual exempt amount are set against the chargeable gain on the sale of the
freehold warehouse because this does not qualify for entrepreneurs’ relief.
 £27,785 (31,785 – 4,000) of Mika’s basic rate tax band is unused, but this is set against the gains qualifying for
entrepreneurs’ relief of £630,000 even though this has no affect on the 10% tax rate.

MARRIED COUPLES

Transfers between spouses (and between partners in a registered civil partnership) do not give rise to any
chargeable gain or capital loss.
Example 9
Bill and Cathy are a married couple. They disposed of the following assets during the tax year 2015–16:
 On 10 July 2015, Bill and Cathy sold a house for £380,000. The house had been purchased on 1 December
2012 for £290,000, and has never been occupied as their main residence.
 On 5 August 2015, Bill transferred his entire shareholding of 20,000 £1 ordinary shares in Elf plc to Cathy. On
that date the shares were valued at £64,000. Bill’s shareholding had been purchased on 21 September 2013 for
£48,000.
 On 7 October 2015, Cathy sold the 20,000 £1 ordinary shares in Elf plc that had been transferred to her from
Bill. The sale proceeds were £70,000.

Bill and Cathy each have taxable income of £50,000 for the tax year 2015–16.
Jointly owned property
 The chargeable gain on the house is £90,000 (380,000 – 290,000).
 Bill and Cathy will each be assessed on £45,000 (90,000 x 50%) of the chargeable gain.

Bill – CGT liability 2015–16

House 45,000

Annual exempt amount (11,100)

33,900

Capital gains tax: 33,900 at 28% 9,492

The transfer of the 20,000 £1 ordinary shares in Elf plc to Cathy does not give rise to any chargeable gain or capital
loss, because it is a transfer between spouses.
 Cathy – CGT liability 2015–16

£ £

House 45,000

Ordinary shares in Elf plc

Disposal proceeds 70,000

(48,000)

22,000

67,000

Annual exempt amount (11,100)

55,900

Capital gains tax:

55,900 at 28% 15,652

Bill’s original cost is used in calculating the chargeable gain on the disposal of the shares in Elf plc.
It may be the case that one spouse has not utilised their annual exempt amount and/or basic rate tax band for a
particular tax year. It could therefore be beneficial to transfer an asset to that spouse before its disposal, or to put an
asset into joint names prior to disposal.
Example 10
For the tax year 2015–16, Jane is a higher rate taxpayer but her husband Claude does not have any taxable income.
During March 2016, Jane is going to dispose of a house, and this will result in a chargeable gain of £120,000.
If 50% ownership of the house is transferred to Claude prior to its disposal, this will enable his annual exempt amount
and basic rate tax band for 2015–16 to be utilised. The CGT saving for the couple will be £6,286:

Annual exempt amount 11,100 at 28% 3,108

31,785 at 10%
Lower rate tax saving (28% – 18%) 3,178

6,286

PART DISPOSALS
 When just part of an asset is disposed of, then the cost must be apportioned between the part disposed of and the
part retained.
Example 11
On 16 February 2016, Joan sold three acres of land for £285,000. She had originally purchased four acres of land on
17 July 2014 for £220,000. The market value of the unsold acre of land as at 16 February 2015 was £90,000.
 The cost relating to the three acres of land sold is £167,200 (220,000 x 285,000/(285,000 + 90,000)).
 The chargeable gain on the land is therefore £117,800 (285,000 – 167,200).
 The base cost of the remaining acre of land is £52,800 (220,000 – 167,200).

With part disposals, care must be taken with enhancement expenditure and incidental costs as these may relate to
the whole asset or just to the part being disposed of.
Example 12
On 20 February 2016, Fergus sold an acre of land for £130,000. He had originally purchased four acres of land on 13
April 2003 for £210,000. During January 2016, Fergus spent £22,800 clearing and levelling all four acres of land. The
market value of the unsold three acres of land as at 20 February 2016 was £350,000. Fergus incurred legal fees of
£3,200 in connection with the disposal.
Fergus’ chargeable gain for 2015–16 is as follows:

Disposal proceeds 130,000

Cost (56,875)

Enhancement expenditure (6,175)

Incidental costs (3,200)

63,750

 The cost relating to the acre of land sold is £56,875 (210,000 x 130,000/(130,000 + 350,000)).
 The cost of clearing and levelling the land is enhancement expenditure. The cost relating to the acre of land
sold is £6,175 (22,800 x 130,000/480,000).
 The incidental costs relate entirely to the acre of land sold, and so they are not apportioned.

CHATTELS

Special rules apply to chattels. A chattel is tangible moveable property.

Example 13
On 18 August 2015, Gloria sold an antique table for £5,600 and an antique clock for £7,200. The antique table had
been purchased on 27 May 2014 for £3,200 and the antique clock had been purchased on 14 June 2014 for £3,700.
 The antique table is exempt from CGT because the gross sale proceeds were less than £6,000.
 The chargeable gain on the antique clock is restricted to £2,000 (1,200 (7,200 – 6,000) x 5/3) because this is
less than the normal gain of £3,500 (7,200 – 3,700).

Where a chattel is sold at a loss and the sale proceeds are less than £6,000, then the amount of allowable capital
loss will be restricted. If capital allowances have been claimed, then no capital loss will be available at all.
Example 14
Giles sold the following assets during the tax year 2015–16:
  On 3 February 2016, he sold an antique table for £4,700. The table had been purchased on 2 May 2005 for
£10,200.
 On 12 March 2016, he sold machinery for £22,600. The machinery had been purchased on 1 June 2012 for
£34,000. Giles claimed capital allowances totalling £11,400 in respect of this machinery.
Table
 The table has been sold for less than £6,000, so the proceeds are deemed to be £6,000 (rather than £4,700).
 The allowable capital loss is therefore £4,200 (6,000 – 10,200).
Machinery
 The cost of £34,000 is reduced by the capital allowances claimed of £11,400, giving an allowable cost of
£22,600.
 Since the proceeds are also £22,600, the disposal is on a no gain, no loss basis.

WASTING ASSETS

A wasting asset is one which has a remaining useful life of 50 years or less. The cost of such an asset must be
adjusted for the expected depreciation over the life of the asset.
Example 15
On 31 March 2016, Mung sold a copyright for £9,600. The copyright had been purchased on 1 April 2011 for £10,000
when it had an unexpired life of 20 years.
The chargeable gain on the copyright is:

Disposal proceeds 9,600

Cost (10,000 x 15/20) (7,500)

2,100

The cost of £10,000 is depreciated based on an unexpired life of 20 years at the date of acquisition and an unexpired
life of 15 years at the date of disposal.

INSURANCE PROCEEDS

If an asset is lost or destroyed, then the receipt of insurance proceeds is treated as a normal disposal. However,
rollover relief is available if the insurance monies are used to purchase a replacement asset within a period of 12
months.
Example 16
On 20 October 2015, an antique table owned by Claude was destroyed in a fire. The table had been purchased on 23
November 2013 for £50,000. Claude received insurance proceeds of £74,000 on 6 December 2015 and on 18
December 2015 he paid £75,400 for a replacement table.
 The insurance proceeds of £74,000 received by Claude have been fully reinvested in a replacement table.
 There is therefore no disposal on the receipt of the insurance proceeds.
 The gain of £24,000 (insurance proceeds of £74,000 less original cost of £50,000) is set against the cost of the
replacement table, so its base cost is £51,400 (75,400 – 24,000).
If the insurance proceeds are not entirely reinvested then there will be an immediate chargeable gain.
Example 17
Continuing with example 16, assume that the replacement table only cost £71,500.
  The insurance proceeds not reinvested of £2,500 (74,000 – 71,500) are taxed as a chargeable gain in 2015–16.
 The balance of the gain of £21,500 (24,000 – 2,500) is set against the cost of the replacement table, so its base
cost is now £50,000 (71,500 – 21,500).
If an asset is damaged, then the receipt of insurance proceeds is treated as a part disposal. However, if all the
proceeds are used to restore the asset, then a claim can be made to ignore the part disposal rules.
Example 18
On 1 October 2015, an antique carpet owned by Juliet was damaged by a flood. The carpet had been purchased on
17 November 2011 for £69,000. Juliet received insurance proceeds of £12,000 on 12 December 2015, and she spent
a total of £13,400 during December 2015 restoring the carpet. Juliet has made a claim to ignore the part disposal
rules.
 The insurance proceeds of £12,000 received by Juliet have been fully applied in restoring the carpet.
 There is therefore no disposal on the receipt of the insurance proceeds.
 The revised base cost of the carpet is £70,400 (69,000 – 12,000 + 13,400).

PRINCIPAL PRIVATE RESIDENCES

A gain on the disposal of a principal private residence is exempt where the owner has occupied the house throughout
the whole period of ownership. The final 18 months of ownership are always treated as a period of ownership. The
following periods of absence are also deemed to be periods of occupation:

 Periods up to a total of three years for any reason.

 Any periods where the owner is required to live abroad due to their employment.
 Periods up to four years where the owner is required to live elsewhere in the UK due to their work.
These deemed periods of occupation must normally be preceded and followed by actual periods of occupation.
Example 19
On 30 September 2015, Hue sold a house for £381,900. The house had been purchased on 1 October 1995 for
£141,900.
Hue occupied the house as her main residence from the date of purchase until 31 March 1999. The house was then
unoccupied between 1 April 1999 and 31 December 2002 due to Hue being required by her employer to work
elsewhere in the UK.
From 1 January 2003 until 31 December 2009, Hue again occupied the house as her main residence. The house was
then unoccupied until it was sold on 30 September 2015.
The chargeable gain on the house is:

Disposal proceeds 381,900

Cost (141,900)

240,000

Principal private
residence exemption (189,000)

51,000

 The total period of ownership of the house is 240 months (189 + 51), of which 189 months qualify for exemption
as follows:
 Exempt months Chargeable months

1 October 1995 to
31 March 1999 (occupied) 42

1 April 1999 to
31 December 2002
(working in UK) 45

1 January 2003 to
31 December 2009
(occupied) 84

1 January 2010 to
31 March 2014 (unoccupied) 51

1 April 2014 to
30 September 2015
(final 18 months) 18 __

189 51

 The unoccupied period from 1 January 2010 to 31 March 2014 is not a period of deemed occupation because it
was not followed by a period of actual occupation.
 The exemption is therefore £189,000 (240,000 x 189/240).

Letting relief will extend the principal private residence exemption where a property is let out during a period that does
not otherwise qualify for exemption.
Example 20
Continuing with example 19, assume that Hue let her house out during the periods that she did not occupy it herself.
The chargeable gain on the house will now be:

Disposal proceeds 381,900

Cost (141,900)

240,000

Principal private
residence exemption (189,000)

Letting relief exemption (40,000)

11,000
 The letting relief exemption is the lower of:

 £40,000
 £189,000 (the amount of the gain exempt under the principal private residence rules)
 £51,000 (the amount of the non-exempt gain attributable to the period of letting (240,000 x 51/240))

Where part of a house is used exclusively for business use then the principal private residence exemption will be
restricted.
Example 21
On 30 September 2015, Mae sold a house for £186,000. The house had been purchased on 1 October 2005 for
£122,000. Throughout the period of ownership, the house was occupied by Mae as her main residence, but one of
the house’s eight rooms was always used exclusively for business purposes by Mae.
The chargeable gain on the house is:

Disposal proceeds 186,000

Cost (122,000)

64,000

Principal private residence exemption (56,000)

8,000

The principal private residence exemption is restricted to £56,000 (64,000 x 7/8).

The second part of the article will cover shares, reliefs and the way in which gains made by limited companies are
taxed. It also contains some exam guidance and a test of your understanding.
Written by a member of the F6 (UK) examining team