Taro 2 PDF
Taro 2 PDF
Taro 2 PDF
ISSN: 2455-4898
www.foodsciencejournal.com
Volume 1; Issue 1; January 2016; Page No. 05-11
Effect of pre-curding on nutritional and anti-nutritional composition of taro (Colocasia esculenta L.)
Leaf
1
Melese Temesgen, 2 Negussie Retta, 3 Etalem Tesfaye
1
Department of Food Science, Haramaya University, P.O. Box 138 Ethiopia.
2
College of Natural Sciences, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 1176 Ethiopia.
3
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box 32 Ethiopia.
Abstract
The objective of this study was designed to investigate the nutritive and non- nutritive constituents of taro leaf powder and leaf curd
extracts through improved processing methods. The study was conducted using factorial combination of two independent variables
(taro leaf varieties and processing methods) with three replications in a completely randomized design (CRD). The analysis
undertaken in this study was leaf proximate composition, mineral concentration and anti-nutritional factors of samples processed as
leaf powder and curd concentrates between local taro and boloso-1 taro varieties. The moisture content in the study ranged from
3.444 ± 0.192 to 3.733 ± 0.693, crude protein from 25.061 ± 1.297 to 26.252 ± 1.530, crude fat from 5.835 ± 0.169 to 6.436 ± 0.889,
fiber from 3.192 ± 1.988 to 4.597 ± 1.396, total ash from 2.706 ± 0.074 to 2.876 ± 0.230, total carbohydrate from 56.221 ± 2.743 to
59.383 ± 2.942, amylose contents from 5.319 ± 1.159 to 6.276 ± 0.987, beta- carotene (mg/100 g) 2.703 ± 0.225 to 2.480 ± 0.205
and phenolic compound(mg/100 g) from 0.957 ± 0.087 to 1.113 ± 0.188. The five macro minerals, mg/100 g of Na, K, Mg, P and
Ca in the study differ significantly (p<0.05) and ranged from lowest (6.607 ± 1.055, 14.333 ± 1.470, 8.293 ± 1.899, 1.179 ± 0.81
and 15.265 ± 6.211 respectively) to highest (7.826 ± 1.827, 17.017 ± 3.4, 9.744 ± 1.908, 1.904 ± 0.995 and 19.547 ± 6.69) value,
respectively. Concerning micro minerals like Zn, Fe, and Cu contents, mg/100 g were significantly (p<0.05); varied from minimum
(9.647 ± 4.550, 40.374 ± 9.831 and 0.415 ± 0.194) to maximum (12.750 ± 1.811, 51.868 ± 17.025 and 0.580 ± 0.221) values, for
boloso-1 taro variety, respectively. From the general trend observed in this study, most of the analyzed samples that boloso-1 taro
variety subjected to curd processing provided better proximate, mineral, functional and lower anti-nutritional contents than that of
the local taro leaf.
Table 1: Content of moisture, crude protein and crude fat (% DM basis) in leaf powder and curd samples from two taro varieties
Treatments
Crude Taro varieties Processing methods Moisture Protein Crude Fat
Boloso-1 Leaf powder 3.733 ± 0.693a 26.069 ± 1.829bb 6.369 ± 0.959ab
Curd concentrate 3.733 ± 0.693a 26.252 ± 1.530a 6.436 ± 0.889a
Leaf powder 3.733 ± 0.693a 25.061 ± 1.297cd 5.835 ± 0.169cd
Local Curd concentrate 3.444 ± 0.192a 25.428 ± 1.923c 6.324 ± 0.988c
CV (%) 2.004 5.585 4.009
Significance level (A x B) ns * *
a-d Means ± SD within a column with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05); SD: standard deviation; CV: coefficient of variation; ns:
non-significant; A:Variety and B: Processing method.
Table 2: Content of crude fiber, total ash, total carbohydrate and energy value (% DM basis) in leaf powder and curd samples from two taro varieties
Treatments
Taro varieties Processing methods Crude Fiber Carbohydrate Total ash Energy value Carbohydrate
Boloso-1 Leaf powder 4.597 ± 1.396a 2.826 ± 56.221 ± 387.213 ± 12.465c
Curd concentrate 3.277 ± 2.122c 2.876 ± 0.230a 57.607 ± 4.774c 392.633 ± 13.432b
Leaf powder 4.037 ± 2.363b 2.849 ± 58.116 ± 386.692 ± 11.592d
Local Curd concentrate 3.192 ± 1.988c 2.706 ± 0.07d 59.383b ± 2.942a 394.695 ± 9.869
CV (%) 9.851 5.713 4.022 1.502
Significance level (A x B) * * * *
a-d Means ± SD within a column with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05); SD: standard deviation; CV: coefficient of variation; ns:
non-significant; A:Variety and B: Processing method.
Table 3: Content of amylose (% DM basis), β-carotene and total phenols (mg/100 g) in leaf powder and curd samples from two taro varieties
Treatments
Taro varieties Processing methods Amylose content β-carotene Phenols
Leaf powder 6.276 ± 0.987a 2.703 ± 0.225a 0.957 ± 0.087bd
Boloso-1 Curd concentrate 5.507 ± 1.462c 2.566 ± 0.341ac 1.073 ± 0.237b
Leaf powder 5.959 ± 1.520ab 2.630 ± 0.337bd 1.057 ± 0.244ac
Local Curd concentrate 5.319 ± 1.159cd 2.480 ± 0.205d 1.113 ± 0.188a
CV (%) 7.306 3.229 8.131
Significance level (A x B) * * *
a-d Means ± SD within a column with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05); SD: standard deviation; CV: coefficient of variation; ns:
non-significant; A:Variety and B: Processing method.
Table 4: Concentration of Na, K, Mg, P and Ca (mg/100 g) in leaf powder and curd samples from two taro varieties
Treatments
Taro varieties Processing methods Na K Mg P Ca
Leaf powder 7.826 ± 16.03 ± 8.293 ± 1.179 ± 15.26 ±
Boloso-1 Curd concentrate 7.216 ± 2.110c 17.017± 3.400a 9.744 ± 1.908a 1.904 ± 0.995a 19.54 ± 6.610a
Leaf powder 7.825 ± 1.820ab 14.333 ± 1.400d 8.546 ± 2.330c 1.399 ± 1.190cd 15.89 ± 7.240c
Local Curd 6.607 ± 16.480 ± 9.499 ± 1.831 ± 19.40 ±
CV (%) 9.830 10.449 7.680 5.739 5.682
Significance level (A x B) * * * * *
a-d Means ± SD within a column with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05); SD: standard deviation; CV: coefficient of variation; ns:
non-significant; A:Variety and B: Processing method.
Table 5: Concentration of Zn, Fe and Cu (mg/100 g) in leaf powder and curd samples from two taro varieties
Treatments
Taro varieties Processing methods Zn Fe Cu
Leaf powder 10.751 ± 5.267b 51.724 ± 17.241ab 0.559 ± 0.256ab
Boloso-1 Curd concentrate 12.750 ± 1.811a 51.868 ± 17.025a 0.415 ± 0.194cd
Leaf powder 9.775 ± 4.718c 40.374 ± 9.831d 0.580 ± 0.221a
Local Curd concentrate 9.647 ± 4.550cd 46.121 ± 19.784c 0.459 ± 0.270c
CV (%) 35.868 29.048 36.743
Significance level (A x B) * * *
a-d Means ± SD within a column with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05); SD: standard deviation; CV: coefficient of variation; ns:
non-significant; A:Variety and B: Processing method.
9
Table 6: Content of tannin, phytate, mucilage, and oxalate (mg/100 g) in leaf powder and curd samples from two taro varieties
Treatments
Taro varieties Processing methods Tannin Phytate Mucilage Oxalate
Leaf powder 419.80 ± 343.45c 8.592 ± 2.44b 0.128 ± 0.05b 198.610 ±171.61c
Boloso-1 Curd concentrate 301.314 ±138.40d 8.525 ± 2.319b 0.132 ±0.064b 152.301 ± 9.646d
Leaf powder 504.241 ± 292.061a 9.880 ± 2.291a 0.165 ±0.060a 257.921 ± 13.34a
Local Curd concentrate 494.362 ± 305.81b 9.880 ± 2.458a 0.165 ± 0.061a 243.192 ± 158.80b
CV (%) 56.328 27.454 41.941 72.3765
Significance level (A x B) * * * *
a-d Means ± SD within a column with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05); SD: standard deviation; CV: coefficient of variation; ns:
non-significant; A:Variety and B: Processing method.
11