Chapter 2: Novel Process For Synthesis of Armodafinil
Chapter 2: Novel Process For Synthesis of Armodafinil
Chapter 2: Novel Process For Synthesis of Armodafinil
Chapter 2
Novel Process for Synthesis of
Armodafinil
Abstract
This chapter describes the synthesis of chiral sulfoxides by using the concept
of nucleophilic substitution on chiral “Sulfur”(S). It has less number of steps
easy reaction conditions and better yields. New process has been developed
for the synthesis of Armodafinil from diphenyl methane thiol which has a
commercial potential.
2.1 Introduction
Modafinil is a racemic drug molecule and contains mixture of ‘S’ and ‘R’
enantiomers. Drug molecule Armodafinil, is nothing but the enantiomerically
pure isomer i.e. ‘R’ enantiomer of racemic molecule Modafinil. This drug is
approved in year 2007 by US FDA. Both Modafinil (Racemic compound) and
its Armodafinil (R-enantiomer) are central nervous system stimulants and this
is applicable to wakefulness to the patients those have excessive sleepiness.
Racemic Modafinil and Armodafinil molecules are linked for a low rate of
serum aminotransferase elevations during therapy but these are not
implicated in case of clinically apparent acute liver injury. Armodafinil ‘R’
isomer has better half-life upto 12-15 hours and ‘S’ isomer of Modafinil has
low half-life i.e. only 4 hours, many researchers expected to find that
Armodafinil (pure R-Modafinil) would have a longer half-life in the body
than racemic form Modafinil which contains 50% R-Modafinil and 50% S-
Modafinil.1-3
The application of single ‘R’ isomer of Modafinil is more beneficial over the
the use of unwanted ‘S’ enantiomer which leads to lower metabolic burden
on the patient body. Armodafinil and racemic Modafinil have similar
pharmacology, however the evidence suggests that Armodafinil is a more
appropriate kinetic approach for patients those have sleepiness disorder,
basically for the shift-work persons.
Modafinil drug available in the market in the dosage form of tablets of 100
and 200 mg under the brand name Provigil. The general dosage of Provigil in
adults is 200 mg once daily in the morning or a one hour before a work
shift. Armodafinil is available in the market with brand name Nuvigil and
dosage form is tablets of 50, 150 and 250 mg,4 the usual dose in adults being
150 to 250 mg once daily.
Mode of action:
Armodafinil is an indirectly considered as a dopamine receptor agonist
racemic Modafinil and Armodafinil bind in-vitro for the dopamine
transporter also it inhibit the dopamine reuptake. Armodafinil is useful for
the patient those have more histamine levels formed in hypothalamus and
increase the concentrations of norepinephrine and serofonin.4
Name : Armodafinil
IUPAC Name : (–)-2-[(R)-(diphenylmethyl)sulfinyl] acetamide
Structure :
O O
S
(R) NH2
1
Armodafinil
There are several routes available for synthesis of Armodafinil starting from
various raw materials like benzhydrol but most of the routes have more
number of steps. The synthetic routes available in the literature for synthesis
of Armodafinil 1 are as follows,
Scheme-1
Drawback of this method:
(-) Alpha methyl benzylamine is used as a resoluting agent for the resolution
of modafinic acid 1.2, because of this resolution 50% unwanted isomer is
wasted. Hence the overall yield is very low.
Scheme-2
In second approach benzhydrylsulfanylacetic acid 2.2 was converted into
ester 2.4 and further oxidized with 30% hydrogen peroxide to give racemic
modafinil acid 1.1. The isolated Modafinil acid 1.1 was resolved using alpha-
methylbezylamine and then separated into its isomer (-) and (+) using
fractional crystallization. Isomer 1.2 was then subjected to esterification
O O
O
OH S S
HS OH H2SO4 O
OH
TFA EtOH
S
S
NH
O O S O O
S
O O S S
H2O2, MeOH N S N
S S
OH
NaOH DCC, DMAP,
CH2Cl2
(-) (+)
1.1 3.3
3.2
NH4OH, MeOH-CHCl3
O O O O
S S
NH2 NH2
1 2.6
Armodafinil
Scheme-3
Racemic modafinil acid (±) 1.1 was prepared from benzhydrol as per the
earlier synthetic method. As part of improvement for the preparation of
selective enantiomeric form of drug molecule Modafinil, here chiral
thiazolidinethione auxiliary was used. Both distereomeric thiazolidinethione
3.2, 3.3 was treated with chloroform-methanol and ammonium hydroxide to
afford (R) isomer i.e Armodafinil 1 and (S) isomer 2.6.
Scheme-4
was used along with oxidizing agent cumene hydroperoxide which itself is
pyrophoric in nature.
Scheme-5
and modafinic acid. Further resolved (R) modafinic acid 1.2 is converted into
Armodafinil 1 (Scheme-6).
Scheme-6
Scheme-7
Drawback of this method:
The chemistry described in above scheme-7 involved recation of chirally pure
R-isomer and isopropyl chloroformate to form anhydride derivative, thereby
increasing number of steps.
Scheme-8
Drawback of this method:
In this synthetic method, vanadium and iron- catalyzed ligands were used for
the sulfoxidation of Armodafinil. All these ligands are costly and not easily
commercially available as well as recovery of the ligands are very difficult.
On the basis of following grounds there is need of new route for the synthesis
of Armodafinil.
1. Considering all the aspects of above reported methods, it is found that all
processes required costly resolving agents for resolution of modafinic acid.
2. Most of the synthetic methods lose 50% of molecule at the later stage, which
affect on atom economy of the molecule.
3. During asymmetric synthesis, costly ligand and metals are used which is
not feasible on the commercial scale of the molecule.
3. Accordingly there remains a need for simple, cost effective and industrially
feasible process for Armodafinil.
4. Keeping in mind all the above issues, we have developed simplest and
robust methodology for Armodafinil synthesis from simple starting material
benzhydrol.
Scheme-9
Scheme-10
The synthesis of Armodafinil is carried out in following reaction sequence
Step-I: Synthesis of diphenylmethanethiol
Step-II: Synthesis of diphenylmethanesulfinic chloride
In our effort to develop a simple and robust route for Armodafinil, we have
chosen benzhydrol, a commercially available starting material.
It was found that one equivalent of Lawesson’s reagent 11.1 with respect to
benzhydrol in toluene was more efficient to achieve better yield than using
two equivalent of Lawesson’s reagent. The optimized reaction condition was
established (Table-1) with simple workup procedure (Scheme-11).
Scheme-11
In Mass analysis, peak appeared at m/z = 199 (M-1) indicated that thiol was
prepared successfully. 1H-NMR and mass confirms the structure of desired
compound.
Scheme-12
Further this menthyl diphenylmethane sulfinate 10.3 and 10.4 was prepared
by another alternative method and the scheme is given below:
Scheme-13
Scheme-14.
After the work-up this intermediate 13.2 was used as such for next reaction
for the preparation of racemic menthyl diphenylmethane sulfinate derivative.
Scheme-15
L-Menthol 1 mole
Triphenyl phosphine 1 mole
Triethylamine 10 mole
Solvent CH2Cl2
Time 60-120 min
After completion of reaction, the two isomers 10.3 and 10.4 were separated
easily on silica column chromatography. The desired isomer 10.4 was well
characterized by 1H-NMR, which is described below.
The desired isomer 10.4 was further treated with methyl acetate and n-Butyl
lithium to get methoxy derivative i.e. (R)-methyl 2-(benzhydrylsulfinyl)
acetate 1.3.
Structure of the compound 10.4 was confirmed by mass, 1H-NMR and 13C-
NMR.
3.39-3.43 and doublet at δ 3.51-3.55 due to –CH2 protons in the molecule and
singlet at δ 3.73 confirmed the presence of methoxy group. Structure was
further supported by 13C-NMR, presence of peak at δ 165.7 confirmed the
ester group and peak at δ 53.9 revealed prescence of –OCH3 group.
Preparation of Armodafinil 1:
After the preparation of methoxy derivative 1.3 it was treated with ammonia
in methanol to end up with desired compound Armodafinil 1.
Scheme-16
Result:
The overall yield of designed route is 27%. The specific rotation of
synthesized Armodafinil matched with literature data [α]D22 = - 77.77° (c = 1.0,
CHCl3) [lit.6 [α] D 22 = - 76.6(c = 1.0, CHCl3].
The structure of compound 1 was also confirmed by mass, 1H-NMR and
chiral HPLC chromatogram showed single enantiomer with the purity 99.99%
(Refer Spectra no-12). This chiral purity and the specific rotation confirmed
the theory of inversion of configuration at ‘S’ during formation of
intermediate molecule 1.3.
2.6 Conclusion
In summary, a simple and new route for the synthesis of Armodafinil was
developed. This route comprises cheaper raw material diphenyl methane
during the overall synthesis. The important attribute of this route is the use of
commercially available L-menthol, as an handle for chiral separation.
The key and important step of this route was nucleophilic reaction on
menthol attached sulfur derivative. Reaction of nucleophile with sulfur,
proceeds through the inversion of configuration. This was proved by the
chiral HPLC and the specific optical rotation at Armodafinil.
The used L-menthol can be recovered after nucleophilic reaction and easily
recycled during scale-up. In this route all the reagents, raw materials are safe
for handling purpose and reaction conditions are easily scalable.
Based on the reduced number of steps, cost efficient and novel route for the
synthesis of Armodafinil is established.
SH
10.1
1H-NMR (400MHz, DMSO-d6) (Refer Spectra No-3): 0.71-1.00 (m, 13H), 1.29
– 1.37 (m, 1H), 1.48-1.61 (m, 2H), 1.80-1.83 (m, 1H), 2.15-2.21 (m, 1H), 3.11-3.23
(m, 1H), 5.30 (S, 1H), 7.32-7.52 (m, 10H).
Methyl acetate (2.64 g, 0.035 moles) in tetrahydrofuran (33 ml) was slowly
added to a n-BuLi in hexane (1.2M) (35.54 ml, 0.042 moles) at -78°C. A
solution of menthyl diphenylmethane sulfinate compound 10.4 (11 g, 0.0297
moles) in THF was added at -78°C over a period of 30-35 min. Reaction mass
was stirred further for 2 h at temperature -60 to -78°C. It was slowly warmed
to ambient temperature, mixture mass quenched with aq. solution of
ammonium chloride to give a suspension. After quenching, water charged
into the mass and layers separated. The separated aqueous layer was
extracted with ethyl acetate. Combined organic layer was concentrated under
vacuum to get an solid. This solid was further purified on silica column
chromatography, using mobile phase ethyl acetate: cyclohexane to get pure
methyl (R)-methyl-2-(benzhydrylsulfinyl) acetate compound 1.3 (5.5 g, yield:
64%).
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) (Refer Spectra No-6): δ = 3.39-3.43 (d, J = 14 Hz,
1H), 3.51 -3.55 (d, J = 14Hz, 1H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 5.21(s, 1H), 7.33-7.51(m, 10H).
13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) (Refer Spectra No-7): δ= 165.7 (C=O), 135.13,
129.2, 128.7-128.4 (CH=CH), 71 (CH), 53.9 (OCH3) 52.6 (CH2) ppm
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) (Refer Spectra No-9) : δ= 3.15-3.18 (d, J = 14.4
Hz, 1H), 3.46-3.50 (d, J =14.4 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (s, 1H), 5.98 (s, 1H), 7.11 (s, 1H),
7.28-7.52 (m, 10H) ppm.
13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) (Refer Spectra No-10): δ= 166.34 (C=O), 134.4,
134.07, 129.40, 129.38, 128.88, 128.76, 128.59 (CH=CH), 71.3(CH), 51.8(CH2)
ppm
IR (KBr, in cm-1) (Refer Spectra No-11): 3368, 3186, 1665, 1364, 1031 cm-1
2.8 Spectra
1. Mass spectra of 10.1
2. 1H-NMR spectra of 10.1
3. 1H-NMR spectra of 10.4
4. 1H-NMR spectra of 10.4 (Elaborated part)
5. Mass spectra of 1.3
6. 1H-NMR spectra of 1.3
7. 13C-NMR spectra of 1.3
8. Mass spectra of 1
9. 1H-NMR spectra of 1
10. 13C-NMR spectra of 1
11. IR spectra of 1
12. Chiral HPLC chromatogram of 1
2.9 References