The Contract Act: Law, BC & Ethics - Newly Added Questions in Latest Practice Manual (April 2016)
The Contract Act: Law, BC & Ethics - Newly Added Questions in Latest Practice Manual (April 2016)
The Contract Act: Law, BC & Ethics - Newly Added Questions in Latest Practice Manual (April 2016)
Dear Students,
Following questions are newly added in the April 2016 edition of ICAI Practice Manual. Since these
questions are newly added by ICAI we were unable to cover them in our 35th Edition materials. Since
all these questions are newly added, they will be very important from exam point of view. Please pay
more attention on these questions.
Communication and revocation of acceptance when complete: The problem is related with the
communication and time of acceptance and its revocation. As per Section 4 of the Indian Contract
Act, 1872, the communication of an acceptance is complete as against the acceptor when it comes to
the knowledge of the proposer.
Whereas section 5 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 says that an acceptance may be revoked at any
time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not
afterwards.
Referring to the above provisions
i) Yes, the revocation of acceptance by Mr. X (the acceptor) is valid.
ii) If Mr. U opens the telegram first (and this would be normally so in case of a rational person) and
reads it, the acceptance stands revoked. If he opens the letter first and reads it, revocation of
acceptance is not possible as the contract has already been concluded.
Incorrect
Q.NO.3 Under what circumstances the original contract need not be performed as stated under
section 62 to 67 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?
Contracts which need not to be performed: A contract would not require performance under
circumstances spelt out in Sections 62 to 67 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. These circumstances
are (i) novation, (ii) rescission, (iii) alteration and (iv) remission.
i) Novation: Novation means substitution. Where a given contract is substituted by a new contract, it is
novation. The old contract, on novation ceases. It need not be performed. Novation can take place
with mutual consent. However, novation can take place by substitution of new contract between the
same parties or between different parties. Novation results in discharge of old contract.
ii) Rescission: In case of rescission, the old contract is cancelled and no new contract comes in its
place. A contract is also discharged by rescission. Sometimes, parties may enter into an
agreement to rescind the previous contract. Sometimes, the contract is rescinded by implication
or by non- performance for a long time without each other complaining about it.
iii) Alteration: Where the contract is altered, the original contract is rescinded. Hence, the old one
need not be performed whereas the new one has to be performed. Alteration involves both
rescission and novation. The line of difference between alteration and novation is very thin. While
there can be very minor alterations, there cannot be unilateral material alteration to a contract. If it
is done it will be void.
Page 1 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
iv) Remission means waiver: Section 63 of the Act deals with remission. It provides that “every
promisee may dispense with or remit wholly or in part, the performance of the promise made to
him or may extend the time for such performance or mayaccept instead of it any satisfaction
which it thinks fit”. Thus the promisee canwaive either in full or in part the obligation of the
promisor or extend the time for performance.
Q.NO.4 ‘X’ entered into a contract with ‘Y’ to supply him 1,000 water bottles @ Rs. 5.00 per
water bottle, to be delivered at a specified time. Thereafter, ‘X’ contracts with ‘Z’ for the
purchase of 1,000 water bottles @ Rs. 4.50 per water bottle, and at the same time told ‘Z’ that
he did so for the purpose of performing his contract entered into with ‘Y’. ‘Z’ failed to perform
his contract in due course and market price of each water bottle on that day was Rs. 5.25 per
water bottle. Consequently, ‘X’ could not procure any water bottle and ‘Y’ rescinded the
contract. What would be the amount of damages which ‘X’ could claim from ‘Z’ in the
circumstances? What would be your answer if ‘Z’ had not informed about the ‘Y’s contract?
Explain with reference to the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Breach of Contract: Damages: Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 lays down that when a
contract has been broken the party who suffers by such breach is entitled to receive from the party
who has broken the contract compensation for any loss or damage caused to him thereby which
naturally arose in the usual course of things from such breach or which the parties knew when they
made the contract to be likely to result from the breach of it.
The leading case on this point is “Hadley v. Baxendale” in which it was decided by the Court that the
special circumstances under which the contract was actually made were communicated by the
plaintiff to the defendant, and thus known to both the parties to the contract, the damages resulting
from the breach of such contract which they would reasonably contemplate, would be the amount of
injury which would ordinarily follow from the breach of contract under these special circumstances so
known and communicated.
The problem asked in this question is based on the provisions of Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act,
1872. In the instant case ‘X’ had intimated to ‘Z’ that he was purchasing water bottles from him for the
purpose of performing his contract with ‘Y’. Thus, ‘Z’ had the knowledge of the special circumstances.
Therefore, ‘X’ is entitled to claim from ‘Z’Rs. 500/- at the rate of 0.50 paise i.e. 1000 water bottles x 0.50
paise (difference between the procuring price of water bottles and contracted selling price to ‘Y’ ) being
the amount of profit ‘X’ would have made by the performance of his contract with ‘Y’.
If ‘X’ had not informed ‘Z’ of ‘Y’s contract then the amount of damages would have been the
difference between the contract price and the market price on the day of default. In other words, the
amount of damages would be Rs. 750/- (i.e. 1000 water bottles x 0.75 paise).
Q.NO.5 Explain the meaning of ‘Quasi-Contracts’. State the circumstances which are identified
as quasi contracts by the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Q.NO.6 Amit stands surety for ‘Bikram' for any amount which ‘Chander’ may lend to 'Bikram'
from time to time during the next three months subject to a maximum amount of Rs.1,00,000 (one
Iakh only). One month later 'Amit' revokes the surety, when 'Chander’ had already lent to ‘Bikram'
Rs. 10,000 (ten thousand). Referring to the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Decide:
i) Whether 'Amit' is discharged from all the liabilities to 'Chander' for any subsequent loan given
to 'Bikram'?
ii) What would be your answer in case 'Bikram' makes a default in paying back to 'Chander' the
already borrowed amount of Rs. 10,000?
Revocation of continuing guarantee: The problem as asked in the question is based on the
provisions of the Indian Contract Act 1872, as contained in Section 130 relating to the revocation of a
continuing guarantee as to future transactions which can be done mainly in the following two ways-
1. By Notice: A continuing guarantee may at any time be revoked by the surety as to future
transactions, by notice to the creditor.
2. By death of surety: The death of the surety operates, in the absence of any contract to the contrary,
as a revocation of a continuing guarantee, so far as regards future transactions. (Section 131).
So far as the transactions before revocation are concerned, the liability of the surety for previous
transactions (i.e. before revocation) remains.
i) Thus applying the above provisions in the given case, Amit is discharged from all the liabilities to
Chander for any subsequent loan.
ii) Answer in the second case would differ i.e. Amit is liable to Chander for Rs. 10,000 on default of
Bikram since the loan was taken before the notice of revocation was given to Chander.
Correct
Page 3 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
2. THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
Q.NO.1
i) What is meant by ‘Sans Recours Endorsement’ of a bill of exchange? How does it differ from
‘Sans Frais Endorsement’?
ii) ‘P’, a major and ‘Q’, a minor executed a promissory note in favour of ‘R’, Examine with
reference to the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the validity of the
promissory note and whether it is binding on ‘P’ and ‘Q’.
A minor may draw, endorse, deliver and negotiate an instrument so as to bind all the parties
except himself. A minor may be a drawer where the instrument is drawn or endorsed by him. In
that case he does not incur any liability himself although other parties to the instrument can be
made liable and the holder can receive payment from any other party thereto.
Therefore, in the instant case, the promissory note is valid and it is binding on ‘P’ but not on ‘Q’, a
minor.
Q.NO.2
i) Mr. A is the payee of an order cheque. Mr. B steals the cheque and forges Mr. A signatures
and endorses the cheque in his own favour. Mr. B then further endorses the cheque to Mr. C,
who takes the cheque in good faith and for valuable consideration. Examine the validity of the
cheque as per the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and also state whether
Mr. C can claim the privileges of a Holder-in-Due course?
ii) Explain the concept and different forms of Restrictive and Qualified endorsement.
i) Title to forged cheque under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: Forgery confers no title and a
holder acquires no title to a forged instrument. A forged document is a nullity. The property in the
instrument remains vested in the person who is the holder at the time when the forged signatures
were put on it. Forgery is also not capable of being ratified. In the case of forged endorsement,
the person claiming under forged endorsement even if he is purchaser for value and in good faith,
cannot acquire the rights of a holder in due course. Therefore, Mr. C acquires no title on the
cheque (Mercantile Bank vs. D’Silva,30 Bom.L.R.1225). Such a holder is not a holder in due
course and hence no privilege is available.
Page 4 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
ii)
1. Restrictive Endorsement: Such an endorsement has the effect of restricting further negotiation
and transfer of the instrument.
Example: (1) Pay to A only S. Mukerjee
(2) For the account of A only N. Aiyar
2. Conditional or qualified endorsement: Such an endorsement combines an order to pay with
condition.
Example: Pay to A on safe receipt of goods. V. Chopra
Validity of Act of Inspector: According to Section 13(2)(b) of the Employees’ Provident Funds and
Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, the inspector can at any reasonable time, enter and search any
establishment and require any one found in charge thereof to produce before him for examination any
accounts, books, registers and other documents relating to employment of persons or the payment of
wages in the establishment.
Further, under Section 13(2)(d) of the said Act, an inspector can inspect and make copies of, or take
extract from any book, register or other document maintained in relation to the establishment and,
when he has reason to believe that any offence under this Act has been committed by any employer,
seize with such assistance as he may think fit, such book, register or other document or portions
thereof as he may consider relevant in respect of that offence.
In the instant case, the inspector has sought to take copies of the “Income Tax Returns”, which are
not relevant documents for the purpose of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952. Moreover, the inspector hasvisited the office of establishment before the normal
working hours of the office, which is not reasonable.
Hence, the action of the inspector is NOT reasonable.
Page 5 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
Q.NO.2 State the provisions of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions
Act, 1952 regulating the quantum of contribution to be made by the employer and employee to
the Provident Fund. Is it possible for an employee to increase the amount of his contribution
to the Provident Fund more than the minimum contribution as statutorily prescribed ?
Contribution to Provident Fund under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952: Section 6 of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions
Act, 1952 regulates contribution to Provident Fund Scheme established under the Act.
The employer's contribution shall be 10% of the basic wages, dearness allowance and retaining allowance,
if any payable to each of the employees whether employed by him directly or by through a contractor.
The employee's contribution shall be equal to the contribution payable by the employer in respect of him.
In case the employee so desires, he may contribute an amount exceeding ten percent of his basic
wages, dearness allowance and retaining allowance if any, subject to the condition that the employer
shall not be under an obligation to pay any contribution over and above his contribution payable
under this section.
Dearness allowance includes cash value of any food concession allowed to the employees. Retaining
allowance means the sum paid for retaining the service, when the factory is not working.
The Central Government may by notification make the employer's contribution equal to 12% for
certain establishments class of establishments.
Q.NO.2 Mr. X was an employee of Green Sugars, Ltd. The whole of undertaking of Green
Sugars Ltd. was taken-over by a new company named Modern Sugars Ltd. The services of Mr.
X remained continuous in the new company. After serving for one year Mr. X met with an
accident and became permanently disabled. Mr. X applied to the new company for the
payment of gratuity. The new company refused to pay gratuity on the ground that Mr. X has
served only for a year in the new company.
Examine the validity of the refusal of the company in the light of the provisions of the Payment of
Gratuity Act, 1972.
Entitlement to Gratuity: According to Section 4 (1) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, gratuity shall
be payable to an employee on the termination of his employment after he has rendered continuous
service for not less than five years on his superannuation, or, on his retirement or resignation or on his
death or disablement due to accident or disease.The proviso to the said section states that the condition
of the completion of five years of continuous service is not essential in case of the termination of the
employment of any employee due to death or disablement for the purpose of this section.
Page 6 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
Disablement has been explained as such disablement which incapacitates an employee for the work
which he was capable of performing before the accident or disease resulting in such disablement.
Further, by the change of ownership, the relationship of employer and employees subsists and the
new employer cannot escape from the liability of payment of gratuity to the employees; it was held in
the case of Pattathurila K. Damodaran Vs M. Kassim Kanju (1993) I LLJ 1211 (Ker).
The given problem fulfils all the above requirements as stated. Therefore, Mr. X is entitled to recover
gratuity after becoming permanently disabled and continuous service of five years is not required in
this case. Hence, the company cannot refuse to pay gratuity on the ground that he has served only
for a year.
6. THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013
UNIT 1: PRELIMINARY
Q.NO.1 Define the term ‘Small Company’ as contained in the Companies Act, 2013.
Small Company: Under Section 2 (85) of the Companies Act, 2013, “small company” means a
company, other than a public company:-
i) having paid-up share capital not exceeding fifty lakh rupees or such higher amount as may be
prescribed which shall not be more than five crore rupees; and
ii) having turnover as per its last profit and loss account not exceeding two crore rupees or such
higher amount as may be prescribed which shall not be more thantwenty crore rupees.
Exceptions: This section shall not apply to:
A holding company or a subsidiary company;
A Company registered under section 8, or
A Company or body corporate governed by any special Act.
Q.NO.2 What is the importance of registered office of a company? State the procedure for shifting
of a registered office of the company from one state to another state under the provisions of the
Companies Act, 2013.
Page 7 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
vi) Notice of the situation of the registered office and of every change therein must be sent to the
Registrar (otherwise than through a statement as to the address of the registered office in the
annual report) within 30 days of the date of incorporation and the date of change. This provision is
designed to locate the spot where the records of the company could be inspected and where the
letters should be addressed and notices served upon the company.
Procedure for shifting the registered office from one state to another state (Section 13, of the
Companies Act, 2013):
In order to shift the registered office from one state to another the following procedure will have to
be followed:
1. Hold a Board Meeting for the purpose of calling a general meeting of the members of the
company in which the shifting of the registered office from one state to another will have to be
approved;
2. The general meeting of the members will have to pass a special resolution approving the
change of address of the registered office from one state to another as required by section 13
(1) of the Companies Act 2013.
3. Make an application to the Central Government/Regional Directors in such form and manner
as may be prescribed, for getting its approval under section 13 (4) of the Companies Act
2013.
4. Under section 13 (7) of the Companies Act 2013, where an alteration of the Memorandum
results in the transfer of the registered office of the company from one state to another, a
certified copy of the order of the Central Government approving the alteration shall be filed by
the company with the registrar of each of the states, within such time and in such manner as
may be prescribed, and the registrars shall register the same. The registrar of the state where
the registered office is being shifted to, shall issue a fresh certificate of incorporation indicating
the alteration.
5. The change in name will be effective only after the issue of the fresh certificate of
incorporation by the Registrar of the state where the registered office is being shifted to.
UNIT – 2: PROSPECTUS
Q.NO.3 MNO Private Limited, a subsidiary of PQR Limited, decides to give a loan of Rs. 4,00,000 to
the HR (Human Resource) Manager, who is not a Key Managerial Personnel (KMP) of MNO Private
Limited, drawing salary of Rs. 30,000 per month, to buy 500 partly paid-up Equity Shares of Rs.
1000 each in MNO Private Limited. Examine the validity of company's decision under the
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
Restrictions on purchase by company or giving of loans by it for purchase of its share: As per
section 67 (3)8 of the Companies Act, 2013 a company is allowed to give a loan to its employees
subject to the following limitations:
a) The employee must not be a Key Managerial Personnel;
b) The amount of such loan shall not exceed an amount equal to six months’ salary of the employee.
c) The shares to be subscribed must be fully paid shares
Section 2 (51) of the Companies Act, 2013 defines the “Key Managerial Personnel” (KMP)
whereby a KMP includes the Chief Executive, Company Secretary, Whole Time Director, Chief
Financial Officer or any other officer who may be prescribed.
In the given instance, HR Manager is not a KMP of the MNO Private Ltd. He is drawing salary of
Rs. 30, 000 per month and loan taken to buy 500 partly paid up equity shares of Rs. 1000 each in
MNO Private Ltd. Keeping the above provisions of law in mind, the company’s (MNO Private Ltd.)
decision is invalid due to two reasons:
Page 8 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
i) The amount of loan being more than 6 months’ salary of the HR Manager, which should have
restricted the loan to Rs. 1.8 Lakhs.
ii) The shares subscribed are partly paid shares where as the benefit is available only for
subscribing fully paid shares.
Q.NO. 4 Define the term "Free Reserves" as contained in the Companies Act, 2013.
Free reserve- As per section 2(43) of the Companies act, 2013, “Free Reserves” means such
reserves which as per the latest audited balance sheet of a company are available for distribution as
dividend provided that :
i) Any amount representing unrealized gains, notional gains or revaluation of assets, whether
shown as a reserve or otherwise or
ii) Any change in carrying amount of an asset or of a liability recognized in equity, including surplus
in profit and loss account on measurement of the asset or the liability at fair value shall not be
treated as free reserves.
Q.NO. 5 Examine the validity of the following referring to the provisions of the Companies Act,
2013 and/or Rules:
“The Articles of Association of X Ltd. contained a provision that upto 4% of issue price of' the
shares may be paid as underwriting commission to the underwriters. The Board of Directors of X
Ltd. decided to pay 5% underwriting commission.
Under the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 the rate of commission
paid or agreed to be paid shall not exceed, in case of shares, five percent (5%) of the price at which
the shares are issued or a rate authorised by the articles, whichever is less.
In the given problem, the articles of X Ltd. have prescribed 4% underwriting commission but the
directors decided to pay 5% underwriting commission. Therefore, the decision of the Board of
Directors to pay 5% commission to the underwriters is invalid.
Q.NO. 6 When is an allotment of shares treated as an irregular allotment? Briefly state the effects
of an irregular allotment.
Irregular allotment: The Companies Act, 2013 does not separately provide for the term “Irregular
Allotment” of securities. Hence, one will have to examine the requirements of a proper issue of
securities and consider the consequences of non fulfilment of those requirements.
In broad terms, an allotment of shares is deemed to be irregular when it has been made by a
company in violation of Sections 23, 26, 39 and 40. Irregular allotment therefore arises in the
following instances:
1. Where a company does not issue a prospectus in a public issue as required by section 23; or
2. Where the prospectus issued by the company does not include any of the matters required to be
included therein under section 26 (1), or the information given is misleading, faulty and incorrect;
or
3. Where the prospectus has not been filed with the Registrar for registration under section 26 (4);
4. The minimum subscription as specified in the prospectus has not been received in terms of
section 39; or
5. The minimum amount receivable on application is less than 5% of the nominal value of the
securities offered or lower than the amount prescribed by SEBI in this behalf; or
Page 9 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
6. In case of a public issue, approval for listing has not been obtained from one or more of the
recognized stock exchanges under section 40 of the Companies Act, 2013 Effects of irregular
allotment: The consequences of an irregular allotment depend on the nature of irregularity.
However, the Companies Act, 2013 does not mention (unlike the previous Companies Act) that in
case of an irregular allotment the contract is voidable at the option of the allottee.
Under section 26 (9) of the Companies Act, 2013 if a prospectus is issued in contravention of the
provisions of section 26, the company shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than fifty
thousand rupees but which may extend to three lakh rupees and every person who is knowingly a
party to the issue of such prospectus shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may
extend to three years or with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may
extend to three lakh rupees, or with both.
Similarly, in case the company has not received the minimum subscription amount within 30 days of
the date of issue of the prospectus, it must refund the application money received by it within the
stipulated time. Any allotment made in violation of this will be void and the defaulting company and
officers will be liable to further punishment as provided in section 39 (5).
Under section 40 (5) any default made in respect of getting the approval to listing of securities in one
or more recognized stock exchange in case of a public issue, will render the company punishable
with a fine which shall not be less than five lakh rupees but which may extend to fifty lakh rupees and
every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which
may extend to one year or with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may
extend to three lakh rupees, or with both.
Hence, under various provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 stringent punishment has been
provided for against irregular allotment of securities but the option of going ahead with such allotment
even if desired by the allottee is not specifically permitted.
Q.NO. 7 Board of Directors of PQR Limited wants to create a ‘Debenture Redemption Reserve
(DRR)’ for the redemption of debentures issued by the company under the provisions of the
Companies Act, 2013. Explain the provisions of the Companies (Share Capital and Debenture)
Rules, 2014 in this regard.
Debenture Redemption Reserve Account [Section 71 of the Companies Act, 2013: Companies
(Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014]: Where debentures are issued by a company under
Section 71 of the Companies Act, 2013, the company shall create a debenture redemption reserve
account out of the profits of the company available for payment of dividend and the amount credited
to such account shall not be utilised by the company except for the redemption of debentures.
As per the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014, the company shall create a
Debenture Redemption Reserve for the purpose of redemption of debentures, in accordance with the
conditions given below:
a) The Debenture Redemption Reserve shall be created out of the profits of the company available
for payment of dividend;
b) The company shall create Debenture Redemption Reserve (DRR) in accordance with the
following conditions:
i) No DRR is required for debentures issued by All India Financial Institutions (AIFIs ) regulated
by Reserve Bank of India and Banking Companies for both public as well as privately placed
debentures. For other Financial Institutions (FIs) within the meaning of clause (72) of Section
2 of the Companies Act, 2013, DRR will be as applicable to NBFCs registered with RBI.
Page 10 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
ii) For NBFCs registered with RBI under Section 45-1A of the RBI (Amendment) Act, 1997 for
Housing Finance Companies registered with the National Housing Bank, the adequacy of
DDR will be 25% of the value of debentures issued through public issue as per present SEBI
(issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008, and no DRR is required in the case
of privately placed debentures.
iii) For other companies including manufacturing and infrastructure companies the adequacy of
DRR will be 25% of the value of debentures issued through public issue as per present SEBI
(Issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008 and also 25% DRR is required in the
case of privately placed debentures by listed companies. For unlisted companies issuing
debentures on private placement basis, the DRR will be 25% of the value of debentures.
c) Every company required to create Debenture Redemption Reserve shall on or before 30th day of
April in each year, as the case may be, a sum which shall be not less than 15%, of the amount of
its debentures, maturing during the year ending on 31st day of March of the next year, in any one
or more of the following methods, namely:
i) in deposits with any scheduled bank, free from any charge or lien;
ii) in unencumbered securities of the Central Government or any State Government;
iii) in unencumbered securities mentioned in sub-clauses (a) to (d) and (ee) of Section 20 of the
Indian Trust Act, 1882;
iv) in unencumbered bonds issued by any other company which is notified under sub-clause (f) of
Section 20 of the Indian Trust Act, 1882;
v) The amount invested or deposited as above shall not be used for any purpose other than for
redemption of debentures maturing during the year referred above: Provided that the amount
remaining invested or deposited, as the case may be, shall not at any time fall below 15% of
the amount of the debentures maturing during the year ending on the 31st day of March of
that year.
d) In case of partly convertible debentures, Debenture Redemption Reserve shall be created in
respect of non-convertible portion of debenture issue in accordance with this sub-rule.
e) The amount credited to the Debenture Redemption Reserve shall not be utilised by the company
except for the purpose of redemption of debentures.
Q.NO. 8 A company refuses to register transfer of shares made by Mr. X to Mr. Y. The company
does not even send a notice of refusal to Mr. X. or Mr. Y respectively within the prescribed period.
Has the aggrieved party any right(s) against the company for such refusal? Advise as per the
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
Refusal of registration and appeal against refusal: The problem as asked in the question is
governed by Section 58 of the Companies Act, 2013 dealing with the refusal to register transfer and
appeal against refusal.
In the present case the company has committed the wrongful act of not sending the notice of refusal
of registering the transfer of shares.
Under section 58 (4), if a public company without sufficient cause refuses to register the transfer of
securities within a period of thirty days from the date on which the instrument of transfer is delivered
to the company, the transferee may, within a period of sixty days of such refusal or where no
intimation has been received from the company, within ninety days of the delivery of the instrument of
transfer, appeal to the Tribunal.
Section 58 (5) further provides that the Tribunal, while dealing with an appeal made under sub-
section (4), may, after hearing the parties, either dismiss the appeal, or by order—
Page 11 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
a) Direct that the transfer or transmission shall be registered by the company and the company shall
comply with such order within a period of ten days of the receipt of the order; or
b) Direct rectification of the register and also direct the company to pay damages, if any, sustained
by any party aggrieved;.
In the present case Mr. X can make an appeal before the tribunal and claim damages.
Q.NO. 9 Explain the concept of ‘electronic voting system’ as provided by the Companies Act,
2013.
Voting through Electronic Means: According to Section 108 of the Companies Act, 2013, the
Central Government may prescribe the class or classes of companies and manner in which a
member may exercise his right to vote by the electronic means. According to the rules provided on
voting through electronic means:
1. Every listed company or a company having not less than one thousand shareholders, shall
provide to its members facility to exercise their right to vote at general meeting by electronic
means.
2. A member may exercise his right to vote at a general meeting by electronic means and the
company may pass any resolution by electronic voting system in accordance with the provisions
of this rule. The expression “voting by electronic means” or “electronic voting system” means a
secured system based process of display of electronic ballots, recording of votes of the members
and the number of votes polled in favour or against, such that the entire voting exercised by way
of electronic means gets registered and counted in an electronic registry in a centralized server
with adequate cyber security.
The expression “secured system” computer hardware, software and procedure that:
Are reasonably secure from unauthorized access and misuse;
Provide a reasonable level of reliability and correct operation;
Are reasonably suited to performing the intended functions; and
Adhere to generally accepted security procedures.
Q.NO. 10The Annual General Meeting of KMP Limited was held on 30th April, 2015. The Articles of
Association of the company is silent regarding the quorum of the General Meeting. Only 10
members were personally present in the above meeting, out of the total 2,750 members of the
company. The Chairman adjourned the meeting for want of quorum. Referring to the provisions of
the Companies Act, 2013, examine the validity of Chairman’s decision.
Quorum; Consequences of no Quorum: Quorum means the minimum number of members who must
be present in order to constitute a meeting and transact business thereat. Thus, quorum represents
the number of members on whose presence the meeting of a company can commence its
deliberations. Section 103 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the law with respect to the quorum
for the meetings. The said section provides that where the Articles of the company do not provide for
a larger number, there the quorum shall depend on number of members as on date of a meeting.
In case of a public company:
i) Five members personally present if the number of members as on the date of meeting is not
more than one hundred;
ii) Fifteen members personally present if the number of members as on the date of meeting is
more than one thousand but up to five thousand;
Page 12 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
iii) Thirty members personally present if the number of members as on the date of the meeting
exceeds five thousand; shall be the quorum for a meeting of the company.
Consequences of no Quorum: If the quorum is not present within half-an-hour from the time
appointed for holding a meeting of the company –
a) The meeting shall stand adjourned to the same day in the next week at the same time and
place, or
b) to such other date and such other time and place as the Board may determine; or
c) the meeting, if called by requisitions (under section 100 ), shall stand cancelled.
In the instant case, KMP Limited is a public company with total number of 2750 members, hence
atleast 15 members should have been personally present in order to constitute a valid quorum for
the Annual General Meeting.
Thus, the meeting shall automatically stand adjourned to the same day in the next week at the
same time and place, if the quorum is not present within half –an-hour from the time appointed for
holding a meeting of the company. Further, the Board of Directors may decide for such other date
and such other time and place, which they may deem fit. Section 103 of the said Act itself
provides for automatic adjournment of the meeting to the same day in the next week at the same
time and place, rather the Chairman obviating to take a decision on the matter of the meeting.
The question of validity of Chairman’s decision does not arise.
i) Incorrect: The given statement “Fairness and Justice” are two different approaches as a source
of ethical standards is incorrect. Aristotle and other Greek philosophers have contributed the idea
that all equals should be treated equally. Today we use this idea to say that ethical actions treat
all human beings equally or if unequally, then fairly based on some standard that is defensible.
We pay people more based on their harder work or the greater amount that they contribute to an
organization, and say that is fair. But there is a debate over CEO salaries that are hundreds of
times larger than the pay of others; may ask whether the huge disparity is based on a defensible
standard or whether it is the result of an imbalance of power and hence is unfair.
ii) Correct: Inclusion of environmental consideration as a part of corporate strategy improves
corporate performance is a correct statement. Environmental consideration is a part of corporate
strategy, which means incorporating environmental issues in the process of developing a product,
in new investments and in the organizational set up. A good environmental practice improves
corporate performance. In many industries it has been found that environmental friendly practices
have resulted in more saving; for example the process of recycling the waste. Thus,
environmental considerations play a key role in corporate strategy. Markets of new millennium will
be able to create wealth if they respond to the challenges of sustainable development, as
unsustainable products will become obsolete.
Page 13 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
2. The Rights Approach (The Deontological Approach): Other philosophers and ethicists suggest
that the ethical action is the one that best protects and respects the moral rights of those affected.
This approach starts from the belief that humans have a dignity based on their human nature per se
or on their ability to choose freely what they do with their lives. On the basis of such dignity, they have
a right to be treated as ends and not merely as means to other ends. The list of moral rights -including
the rights to make one's own choices about what kind of life to lead, to be told the truth, not to be
injured, to a degree of privacy, and so on-is widely debated; some now argue that non-humans have
rights, too. Also, it is often said that rights imply duties-in particular, the duty to respect others' rights.
3. The Fairness or Justice Approach: Aristotle and other Greek philosophers have contributed the
idea that all equals should be treated equally. Today we use this idea to say that ethical actions
treat all human beings equally-or if unequally, then fairly based on some standard that is
defensible. We pay people more based on their harder work or the greater amount that they
contribute to an organization, and say that is fair. But there is a debate over CEO salaries that are
hundreds of times larger than the pay of others; many ask whether the huge disparity is based on
a defensible standard or whether it is the result of an imbalance of power and hence is unfair.
4. The Common Good Approach: The Greek philosophers have also contributed the notion that life
in community is a good in itself and our actions should contribute to that life. This approach
suggests that the interlocking relationships of society are the basis of ethical reasoning and that
respect and compassion for all other sespecially the vulnerable-are requirements of such
reasoning. This approach also calls attention to the common conditions that are important to the
welfare of everyone. This may be a system of Laws, effective police and fire departments, health
care, a public educational system, or even public recreational areas.
5. The Virtue Approach: A very ancient approach to ethics is that ethical actions ought to be
consistent with certain ideal virtues that provide for the full development of our humanity. These
virtues are dispositions and habits that enable us to act according to the highest potential of our
character and on behalf of values like truth and beauty. Honesty, courage, compassion,
generosity, tolerance, love, fidelity, integrity, fairness, self-control, and prudence are all examples
of virtues. Virtue ethics asks of any action, "What kind of person will become if I do this?" or "Is
this action consistent with my acting at my best?"
Page 14 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
Measures: In general, corporate governance measures include appointing non executive directors,
placing constraints on management power and ownership concentration, as well as ensuring proper
disclosure of financial information and executive compensation. Many companies have established
ethical and/or social Responsibility committees on their Boards to review strategic plans, assess
progress and offer guidance on social responsibilities of their business. In addition to having
committees and Boards, some companies have adopted guidelines governing their own policies
around such issues like board diversity, dependence, and compensation. Indian companies are also
required to comply with Clause 49 of the listing agreement.
9. WORKPLACE ETHICS
Q.NO.1 Explain the various socio-psychological factors responsible for developing negative
attitude by an individual at workplace.
Page 15 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
Dismissal: Firing an employee on the basis of his or her race or sex is a clear form of discrimination.
Less blatant but still discriminatory are layoff policies that rely on a seniority system, in which women
and inorities have the lowest seniority because of past discrimination.
10. ENVIRONMENT AND ETHICS
13.ESSENTIALS OF COMMUNICATION
i) Proxemics: It is form of a non-verbal communication which refers to the space that exists
between us when we talk or relate to each other as well the way we organize space around us.
We can also call it ‘space language” as the following four space zones indicate the type of
communication and the relationship of the source and receiver:
Intimate – Physical contact to 18 inches.
Personal – 18 inches to 4 feet.
Social – 4 to 12 feet
Public-12 feet to as far as we can see or hear.
ii) Haptics: It is communication through touch. How we use touch sends important messages about
us. It reveals our perceptions of status, our attitudes and even our needs. The amount of touching
we do or find acceptable is at least in part culturally conditioned.
Page 16 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
14. INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS
Q.NO.1 What is meant by 'Critical thinking'? Suggest the measures to develop critical thinking.
Critical Thinking: Critical thinking is the discipline of rigorously and skillfully using information,
experience, observation and reasoning to guide one's decisions, actions and beliefs. Critical thinking
refers to the act of question of every step of the thinking process e.g. Have you considered all the
facts? Have you tested your assumptions? Is your reasoning sound? Can you be sure your judgment
is unbiased? Is your thinking process logical, rational and complete?
Developing Critical thinking: To develop as a critical thinker, one must be motivated to develop the
following attributes:
1. Open-minded: Readiness to accept and explore alternative approaches and ideas.
2. Well informed: Knowledge of the facts and what is happening on all fronts.
3. Experimental: Thinking through 'what if scenarios to create probable options and then test the
theories to determine what will work and what will not be acceptable.
4. Contextual: Keeping in mind the appropriate context in the course of analyses. Apply factors of
analysis is that are relevant or appropriate.
5. Reserved in making conclusion: Knowledge of when, a conclusion is a 'fact' and when it is not
only true conclusions support decisions.
Page 17 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
15. GROUP DYNAMICS
Q.NO.1 List out the characteristics of group personality under Group Dynamics.
Page 18 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
17. COMMUNICATION CORPORATE CULTURE, CHANGE AND INNOVATIVE SPIRITS
Page 19 of 20
LAW, BC & ETHICS – NEWLY ADDED QUESTIONS IN LATEST PRACTICE MANUAL(APRIL 2016)
18. COMMUNICATION IN BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
The Press Note: The press notes are less formal in character. They are issued on important matters,
e.g. raising or lowering of tariff rates etc. The press note also carries the name of the ministry or
department concerned and the place and date at the bottom left-hand corner. Heading or sub-
heading are given in the press notes.
THE END
Page 20 of 20