Applications For Examination Allowances: Notes For Guidance For Staff and Students 2017-18
Applications For Examination Allowances: Notes For Guidance For Staff and Students 2017-18
Applications For Examination Allowances: Notes For Guidance For Staff and Students 2017-18
Contents
1. Introduction
4. Warning Letters
6. Returning to Study
7. Review Procedure
8. Key Contacts
1.2 Eligibility
The Applications Committee considers applications for examination allowances from
colleges on behalf of undergraduates and also on behalf of students on the following
postgraduate courses: EMBA; LLM; MASt; MBA; MCL; MEng; M.Fin; MMath; MMus; MSci;
PGCE.
It does not consider applications for those graduate students for which the Board of
Graduate Studies is responsible, nor does it consider applications for students being
examined for courses leading to the M.B, B.Chir or the Vet.M.B.
If the Committee approve the request, the Chair of the Board is invited to class the student
by disregarding the affected paper(s). Evidence is required of the mitigating circumstances
and that they affected those paper(s) to which the application is made, and not the whole
examination. Evidence is also required that the student’s academic performance was not as
expected in the affected part of the examination, so supervision reports should be submitted.
Additionally, for these applications, it is helpful if the College include the student’s
examination timetable.
The following table demonstrates which circumstances allow for which type of allowance;
The application must be complete, i.e. it must include all the required documentation, a tutorial
signature and explicit confirmation as to whether or not it has the College’s support, and if it
does not, to confirm it has told the student so. Applications that have not had this information
completed may be returned, and this could delay the Committee’s consideration. The
application may also include any additional information which the college wishes to submit.
The student may, if they wish, seek to have their own statement or other supporting evidence
included. It is in all parties’ interests that any such statement is clear and concise. The
Committee regards it as good practice that the student should be fully aware of all the
documentation being submitted by the College.
Medical evidence should be obtained prior to the completion of the examination. Post hoc
medical evidence will be regarded as such by the Committee and is unlikely to be given the
same weight as evidence which pre-dates an examination. Where a student’s referral to a
specialist medical advisor has been delayed for reasons outside the student’s control,
this should be made clear.
Evidence must be submitted by the deadline of the Committee meeting at which the college
would like the application to be considered. The Committee expects to receive evidence from
a medically qualified practitioner, for example a doctor’s report, preferably from a doctor
based in Cambridge.
Where appropriate, it will additionally consider evidence from an accredited counsellor.
If there is a disability element to the application, the Committee would normally expect to see
reference to consultation with the DRC.
In the case of short term debilitation, the Committee will consider evidence from a college
nurse. Statements by college nurses will generally suffice in instances of ‘routine’
illness and acute medical problems with measurable and visible symptoms
Evidence is required, as opposed to merely a declaration that the student was debilitated.
Supporting letters from relatives or friends, irrespective of whether they are medically
qualified, or anecdotal sources of information do not constitute medical evidence and are not
acceptable to the Committee.
The medical evidence should be a clear diagnosis which includes the nature and severity of
the illness; it should state how the condition is likely to have affected the student’s
examination preparation and / or performance or academic progress. The evidence should
be precise and self-explanatory.
The amount of evidence required will vary from case to case. For example, hospital
admission will need a shorter explanation than will a less obvious or less serious condition
where background information and details of the candidate’s medical history may be
required.
Strict confidentiality is observed regarding medical evidence. Medical evidence is disclosed only
to the medical members of the Committee (although it is accepted that it will also be seen by the
Secretary and Assistant Secretary to the Committee and by College staff collating the
application). Other members of the Committee do not see this part of the application unless the
student explicitly asks that they should do so. The student is required to submit a form giving
permission for their medical evidence to be disclosed to the medical members of the
Committee.
During the examination period, a college may wish to alert the Committee that a student has
experienced a problem. This is called a “warning” and is submitted by the College via the
Student Information System, CamSIS. No action is taken at the submission stage.
If the college subsequently makes an application to the Committee on behalf of the student, the
fact that there was a warning will be disclosed to the Committee. If the college does not make
an application, no action is taken on the warning.
Warnings are not disclosed to Chairs of Examiners nor their Examination Boards. This is to
ensure that warnings, and the circumstances they describe, are considered consistently by one
Committee which has an overview of custom and practice across the University. An
Examination Board is asked to consider a student on the basis of the academic work presented.
If a college then considers that the outcome is not representative of the student’s proved ability,
the normal procedures for applying to the Committee should be followed.
6.1 General
When considering a request to disregard terms, the Committee is mindful that it should not
bestow an advantage or a disadvantage on the student. Returning to repeat a year, or a part of
a year, which the student has successfully completed, or repeating an examination which the
student has already attempted, is normally declined. Examination allowances (DDH, put in
standing, allowance of the examination) are intended to accommodate these circumstances.
Where a student has been granted leave to disregard terms, the student does not have access
to University facilities, libraries, lectures etc. In the intervening period, it is the College’s
responsibility to monitor any course changes and to keep in close contact with the
Faculty/Department responsible for arranging student supervisions regarding the feasibility of
what is being proposed.
Where a student wishes to return, the college is required to apply to the Committee for
permission for the student to return. A student may not resume without obtaining this
permission. At this point, the college should also submit any required evidence of fitness to
return.
When a student returns, they may find that the content of the course and / or examination has
changed. No special provision is made for this and the student is expected to comply with the
course content and examination as required for that year.
Where an overseas student disregards terms, there may be implications for the University and
for the individual student for visa requirements. In the first instance the college should contact
the International Student Team.
Wherever possible, medical evidence confirming fitness to return should be provided by the
same person who made the original diagnosis. Where this is not possible, the student should
arrange for the current practitioner, for example GP or consultant, to see the medical evidence
from the time of the original diagnosis to inform their judgement on the student’s fitness to
return.
The Committee and or the College may set other, non-medical, conditions before resumption.
For example, students may need to satisfy the requirements of a college examination or some
other form of academic assessment as a condition of returning from a period of disregarded
terms. These should be made clear to the student when permission to disregard terms is given.
The student should be in no doubt as to the nature of these conditions, what is required of
him/her and the deadline for satisfaction of such conditions. A clear statement of what facilities
(if any) and support will be made available to the student to meet any such conditions should be
given.
It is the student’s responsibility to obtain this evidence in time for the college to submit it by the
Committee’s deadline. If the evidence is delayed for reasons outside the student’s or the
College’s control, this should be made clear. The deadline for a college to apply for a student to
return for the academic year is 24 August; for the calendar year is 24 November; and for return
in the Easter term is 24 March. The college and student(s) should ensure that all the
documentation is ready for submission by that date.
In cases where continued medical treatment, including psychiatric treatment, is required, the
Committee needs to be satisfied that such treatment can satisfactorily be delivered in
Cambridge.
In the cases of disabled students returning from a period of disregarded terms, the Committee
would expect an indication that the DRC had been informed in order for any necessary support
to be ready from the resumption of the student’s studies.
Details of the Review Procedure and form can be found online and requests for review
should be submitted on the Review Request form within 14 days of the formal decision being
issued. It is particularly important for this purpose that the College keep records of when it
communicates the Committee’s decisions to the students. In instances where the Committee
has declined an application or offers an alternative to the allowance sought, it is essential
that the decision is conveyed to the student as soon as possible.
The review will essentially be of a procedural nature i.e. the Reviewer will consider whether
in reaching its decision(s) the Committee has observed the relevant Ordinances and these
Notes of Guidance and whether or not it has come to a reasonable decision in that context.
The Review Procedure is the final stage before the student may take their case to the Office
of the Independent Adjudicator.
8. Key contacts