The Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Discussion
The Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Discussion
The Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Discussion
examination/Formative assessment/
Discussion Summative assessment
Nurse education ●This article has been double-blind
peer reviewed
T
skills students should achieve (Fig 1). In their learning outcomes (Nulty et al, 2011).
he objective structured clinical progressing up the pyramid to “shows The NMC (2010) says programme pro-
examination, first used in the how”, students demonstrate their knowl- viders for pre-registration nurse education
1970s, is an assessment of com- edge and understanding by performing in must ensure “the outcomes, competencies
petence carried out in a well- a simulated setting such as an OSCE. and proficiencies of the approved pro-
planned, structured and objective way OSCEs may be used as a summative or gramme are tested using valid and reliable
(Harden and Gleeson, 1979). It is well estab- formative assessment and on their own or assessment methods”. OSCEs assess stu-
lished within medicine and is used increas- with another form of assessment. Summa- dents’ psychomotor, cognitive and affec-
ingly in nurse education (Nulty et al, 2011). tive OSCEs are frequently used at the end of tive skills in a simulated environment and
The assessment of knowledge and skills courses or programmes, or on completion various tools score their performance.
plays an important part in student nurses’ of a module to test students against set
progression though pre-registration pro- objectives and learning outcomes. Where The OSCE environment
grammes because they need to demon- they are used as a formative assessment, the An OSCE can consist of one station where
strate competency and confidence in the feedback provided helps students to students perform one or a variety of skills
and are tested on the underpinning clin-
ical and theoretical knowledge, or mul-
Box 1. practical points for students tiple stations, each testing a different skill
or piece of underpinning knowledge
During your OSCE: something, as you may still have time to (Mitchell et al, 2009).
● Pay attention to verbal and written do it; Examples of practical skills include per-
instructions and clarify any queries with ● Keep an eye on the time; forming vital signs on a patient and using
the assessor before you start; ● Communicate with the patient/carer; an aseptic non-touch technique to per-
● Check all the equipment you will need ● On completion, take a moment to run form a simple dressing change; an assessor
is present at the station; through in your mind what you were is present during the procedure to mark
● Stay calm and focused; asked to do and check that you have each student on their skills. The underpin-
● Inform the assessor if you forget to do completed the task. ning knowledge, including anatomy and
physiology, can be assessed as a
paper-based or verbal exercise at a staffed Fig 1. the OSCE within Miller’s pyramid
or unstaffed station and marked after-
wards. Verbal questions, multiple-choice
or short-answer questions might be used. Does
OSCEs should be managed in universi-
ties’ simulated clinical skills area so all stu-
dents are exposed to the same environ-
OSCE
ment (Rushforth, 2007; Major, 2005).
Scenarios, case studies or simulations are Shows How
commonly used and students are expected
to perform specific skills, interpret infor-
mation, make clinical decisions and com-
municate with patients and other team or Knows How
family members.
As students progress to a higher level of
study, the stations become more complex
(Mitchell et al, 2009; Zaidi, 2006). Unlike Knows
OSCEs in medicine, where real patients are
frequently used, nursing tends to use role
players (actors or academic staff ) or mani-
kins as the patient. The move away from to be used in the OSCE; Marking OSCEs
using OSCEs to assess skills in isolation to a » Be familiar with checklist/marking A checklist is frequently used to mark
more holistic approach where the skills are criteria; OSCEs to increase the objectivity and reli-
more integrated into the assessment is » Rehearse skills; ability of the assessment, especially when
intended to make the assessment more real- » Know the timing of the OSCE; several assessors are required. This con-
istic (Major, 2005). » Develop skills on clinical placement; sists of the skill broken down into steps,
Filming students’ performance in form- » Revise the underpinning theory of skills; which are marked using a binary rating
ative and summative OSCEs is common » Use feedback from mock/formative (“achieved” or “not achieved”). Tables 1 and
practice. The film can be used to identify OSCEs; 2 contain samples of checklists from a year
areas where students need to improve, or » Use available resources such as guided 1 (level 4) pre-registration nursing OSCE.
by assessors to resolve a query regarding a study, quizzes and videos; The complete OSCE assesses profes-
student’s performance and also as a form » Check whether they should wear sional behaviour, communication, consent,
of moderation. This should take place for uniforms; handwashing, temperature, pulse, respira-
summative OSCEs to avoid any subjec- » Confirm the date, time, venue and tory rate and manual blood pressure. Two
tivity, and external examiners should be allow enough time to get there; lecturers are present, one as the patient
involved in reviewing the content of the » Practise answering questions verbally. (unless an actor is used) and one leading the
stations, checklists and marking criteria. Box 1 contains some practical points for assessment, with both contributing
students during their OSCE. towards the final mark. The student stays in
Student preparation the same room and performs the skills in
Preparation is vital and increases students’ Assessor/role player preparation any order, but must cleanse their hands
confidence in performing skills during the The assessor and patient need clear guide- before and after contact with the patient.
OSCE and in clinical areas (Street and lines about their roles and how much inter- A global rating scale can be used in
Hamilton, 2010). Formative or mock action is allowed with the student – the stu- combination with a checklist or on its own
OSCEs also increase confidence and com- dent must also be made aware of this. (Rushforth, 2007). The scale allows the
petence (Alinier, 2003). The assessor must be totally familiar overall quality of the student’s perfor-
Students preparing for an OSCE should: with and have a good understanding of the mance to be assessed by an experienced
» Be psychologically prepared; marking criteria and guidelines. It is useful and knowledgeable assessor (Rushforth,
» Be familiar with how equipment works; for first-time assessors to observe some 2007). An example of a global rating score
» Know which procedures/guidelines are OSCEs to gain insight into the process. involves the assessor identifying the level
of the skill performance across the range
Table 1. Checklist for professional behaviour “excellent/good/satisfactory/borderline
pass/borderline fail/fail”. A Likert scale of
Criteria Achieved Not achieved “pass-borderline-fail” can be used by the
Behaves in a professional manner consistent with assessor to judge a student’s performance.
professional standards The assessor must have a sound under-
standing of the assessment and the
Performs procedures with due respect to patient
marking tool.
safety, privacy and dignity
Adheres to uniform policy/dress code Student feedback
Introduces self to patient The stressful nature of OSCEs and the
impact an unsuccessful outcome can have
Asks patient whether they prefer to be called Mr/
on students makes early feedback impor-
Mrs/Ms or by first name
tant. However, providing instant or early
Practice; 8: 4, 283-289.
feedback can prove difficult for staff 2012, Nulty et al, 2011; Jay, 2007). Harden R, Gleeson F (1979) Assessment of
because of student numbers, staffing Academic and clinical staff have the medical competence using an objective structured
levels or exam processes (Nulty et al, 2011). challenge of ensuring that the assessment clinical examination. Medical Education; 13: 1, 41-54.
Harden RM (1990) Twelve tips for organising an
OSCE areas that need improvement process is valid and reliable (Martensson OSCE. Medical Teacher; 12: (3-4) 259-264.
should be identified, as well as those that and Lofmark, 2013; Rushforth, 2007). Hodges B (2003) Validity and the OSCE. Medical
were performed well to motivate students. Some studies have shown that OSCEs Teacher; 25: 3, 250-254.
Some universities encourage students to do not always indicate students’ compe- Humphris G, Kaney S (2001) Examiner fatigue in
communication skills objective structured
reflect on their performance during OSCEs. tence (Major, 2005; Hodges, 2003). External examinations. Medical Education; 35: 5, 444-449.
This can be useful for those who are suc- factors can contribute towards poor per- Jay A (2007) Students’ perceptions of the OSCE:
cessful to improve their proficiency in a formance in an OSCE and more than one a valid assessment tool? British Journal of
Midwifery; 15: 1, 32-37.
particular skill and also for students who attempt at a summative OSCE can allow an Kirton S, Kravitz L (2011) Objective structured
are unsuccessful by identifying areas of the accurate assessment of competency clinical examinations (OSCEs) compared with
OSCE that require more work. (Kirton and Kravitz, 2011). Where there are traditional assessment methods. American Journal
of Pharmaceutical Education; 75: 6, 111.
large cohorts of students, OSCEs can Major D (2005) Seven years on the bandwagon: the
Advantages of OSCEs become exhausting for staff (Humphris progress of an objective structured clinical examination
OSCEs can complement content and other and Kaney, 2001). This, along with other programme. Nurse Education Today; 25: 6, 442-454.
forms of assessment within a programme. resource and cost implications, raises the Mårtensson G, Löfmark A (2013) Implementation
and student evaluation of clinical final examination
Byrne and Smith (2008) advocate their use question of whether the OSCE is a viable in nursing education. Nurse Education Today; 33;
throughout the nursing curriculum and form of assessment for some universities. 12: 1563-1568.
Nulty et al (2011) agree, providing the clin- Miller G (1990) The assessment of clinical skills/
competence/performance. Academic Medicine;
ical skills and the assessment of fitness for Conclusion 65: 9, 63-67.
practice are assessed at the right level for the The NMC (2010) states that learning out- Mitchell M et al (2009) The OSCE: optimising its
student at that stage in their programme. comes should be assessed using a variety value in the undergraduate nursing curriculum.
Nurse Education Today; 29: 4, 398-404.
OSCEs foster a deeper approach to of assessments. Providing that OSCEs are
Nulty D et al (2011) Best practice guidelines for use
learning and encourage more meaningful used appropriately they are valuable in of OSCEs: maximising value for student learning.
learning and reflection (Barry et al, 2012; Jay, assessing students’ performance and Nurse Education Today; 31: 2, 145-151.
2007; Alinier, 2003). They can be used to underpinning knowledge of clinical skills. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2010) Standards for
Pre-registration Nursing Education. London: NMC.
assess a range of skills in an objective By assessing students in the upper two Nursing and Midwifery Council (2007) Essential Skills
manner (Watson et al, 2002) but those skills stages of Miller’s pyramid we are helping Clusters for Pre-registration Nursing Programmes.
need to be developed in parallel with what a to prepare them for real-life situations in Rushforth H (2007) Objective structured clinical
examination (OSCE): review of literature and
nurse will be doing in the clinical area. the clinical area. NT implications for nursing education. Nurse
Authors agree students are able to make the Education Today; 27: 5, 481-490.
connection between OSCEs and clinical References Street P, Hamilton L (2010) Preparing to take
Alinier G (2003) Nursing students’ and lecturers’ objective structured clinical examinations. Nursing
placements, so they give them confidence perspectives of objective structured clinical Standard; 24: 34, 35-39.
in dealing with situations in the clinical examination incorporating simulation. Nurse Taras M (2005) Assessment – summative and
field (Barry et al, 2012; Nulty et al, 2011; Jay, Education Today; 23: 6, 419-426. formative – some theoretical reflections. British
Barry M et al (2012) An exploration of student Journal of Educational Studies; 53: 4, 466-478.
2007; Brosnan et al, 2006; Alinier, 2003). midwives’ experiences of the Objective Structured Watson R et al (2002) Clinical competence
Beckham (2013) concludes OSCEs can Clinical Examination assessment process. Nurse assessment in nursing: a systematic review of the
identify students who are weak in per- Education Today; 32: 6, 690-694. literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing; 39: 5, 421-431.
forming clinical skills early on in their pro- Beckham N (2013) Objective structured clinical Zaidi F (2006) Developing and running an OSCE:
evaluation effectiveness in clinical evaluation for a personal reflection. British Journal of Midwifery;
gramme. With a raised awareness of this, family nurse practitioner students. Clinical 14: 12, 725-729.
and the help of tutors, mentors and lec- Simulation in Nursing; 9: 10, e453-e459.
turers, students can be directed to extra ses- Brosnan M et al (2006) Implementing objective
sions, resources and assistance in practice. structured clinical skills evaluation (OSCE) in nurse further reading
education programmes in a centre in Ireland: a
utilisation focused evaluation. Nurse Education
Limitations of OSCEs Today; 26: 2, 115-122. Using OSCE for mandatory training.
Byrne E, Smyth S (2008) Lecturers’ experience
Research shows students find OSCEs a nursingtimes.net/OSCE1
and perspectives of using an objective
stressful form of assessment (Barry et al, structured clinical examination. Nurse Education in