Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
78 views2 pages

9 - Defense Rating Sheet

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2

Holy Child College of Information Technology Inc.

Orchid St., Brgy. Libertad, Surallah, South Cotabato

RESEARCH DEFENSE RATING FORM


Researchers:
Name of Panel Member:
Date of Proposal Defense: __________________________ Place: _________ Time __________
Rating Guide:
4 – Outstanding - Meets the criteria in all indicators 3- Very Satisfactory - Meets the criteria in most indicators
2- Fair - Meets criteria in some indicators 1 – Needs Improvement – Meets criteria in very few indicators
Please write the score based on your objective assessment.
Criteria/Indicators 4 3 2 1
Score 16-20 11-15 6-10 1-5
Clarity and Importance of Problem Statement (20 %) Problem
statement builds a logical, coherent argument for the relevance of the
study. It leads to the hypotheses to be tested and/or the questions to be
answered. It is clear precisely what this study is intended to accomplish.
Study contributes to educational theory, policy, and/or practice.
Adequacy of Literature Review/Conceptual Framework (20%)
The literature review show how the proposed study will build upon and
go beyond previous research on the subject. The analysis is a critical
review of the literature. The key concepts are clearly defined and
organized in a way that makes sense.
Adequacy of Methodology (20%) The research design is clear. The
selection of sample from the population is specified. The sample size is
adequate. The kinds and sources of data required to carry out the study
are specified and available. The data collection methods are adequately
described. There is a clear strategy to analyze the data and/or to test the
hypotheses?
Manuscript/Organization (20%) The manuscript shows clarity and
style; cogency, logic, sequencing of information; completeness and follows
prescribed format.
Oral Presentation/Delivery (20%) The presenter/s speaks with
confidence and manifests adequacy of vocabulary; right use of words;
mastery of research proposal; is able to respond to inquiries; and used
appropriate visual aid.

Total Score ____________ Rating_________


Score Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score Rating
100 100 93-94 95 85 90 76-77 85 68-69 80
99 99 91-92 94 83-84 89 75 84 66-67 79
98 98 90 93 81-82 88 73-74 83 65 78
96-97 97 88-89 92 80 87 71-72 82 63-64 77
95 96 86-87 91 78-79 86 70 81 61-62 76
60 75
Below 60 NC

Signature of Panel Member _____________________

Noted by:
Chairperson
Holy Child College of Information Technology Inc.
Orchid St., Brgy. Libertad, Surallah, South Cotabato

COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS

Researchers: _______________________________________________________________________________
Name of Panel Member: _____________________________________________________________________
Date of Proposal Defense: __________________________ Place: _______________ Time________________

Please read the research manuscript ahead of the defense schedule and write your comments and suggestions
below (Use the back of the sheet if needed).

Signature of Panel Member: ___________________

You might also like