Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Review of Journal: STEM The Boredom: Engage Students in The Australian Curriculum Using ICT With Problem-Based Learning and Assessment by Christopher Paul Newhouse

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Name : Avina Nur Aizah

Student number : 2201417056


Subject : Research in Language Education

Review of Journal : STEM the Boredom: Engage Students in the Australian


Curriculum Using ICT with Problem-Based Learning and Assessment by Christopher
Paul Newhouse

Summary :
The well-being of modern economies and societies is increasingly requiring citizens to
possess capabilities in integrating knowledge and skills in science, technology, engineering
and science to solve problems. However, by the end of schooling, the majority of Australian
students show little interest in these discipline areas and have no plans to continue study or
work in them; many refer to these disciplines as boring. Further, they typically have little
experience in integrating knowledge and skills from these disciplines and/or in applying this
to solve relevant problems. Therefore, there is a need to engage students with such learning
experiences to develop their interest and capabilities, particularly during the early years of
secondary schooling. This is not easy for teachers to respond to, but with the support of
modern digital technologies and the new Australian curriculum, the potential is expanded and
the challenge is more readily achievable. However, appropriate pedagogies need to be
supported that include more authentic approaches to assessment. Learning activities need to
support students to integrate knowledge and skills across discipline areas in tackling real
problems, and this also needs to be reflected in how students are assessed. In this paper, I will
draw on personal experience as a teacher, a review of recent literature, components of the
Australian Curriculum, and findings from research projects associated with my University
research centre, to argue for, and illustrate how, teachers can orchestrate powerful learning
activities to promote an interdisciplinary
approach to STEM.

Judgement :
It is clear that increasingly the Australian economy and society needs citizens with
STEM knowledge and skills (Ritz and Fan 2015), but that currently formost children, this is
not adequately provided through the school systems (Office of the Chief Scientist 2014).
While most students may study some science, technology, engineering and mathematics
courses, it is unlikely that they do this in the integrated manner that is needed for
application to real problems, that is,STEMlearning (Myers and Berkowicz 2015a; Blackley
and Howell 2015). Further, the manner in which many of these courses are presented to
students is perceived by many of them as boring (Sanders 2012). How can this STEM
boredom be reduced? The use of ICT to support learning activities can be part of the solution.
There are many ways teachers can employ ICT with students to support enhanced learning
environments that includes quality learning activities, drawing on knowledge and skills
across STEM disciplines, and aimed at improving conceptual understanding. There is
substantial evidence that ICT can be used purposefully to support better implementation of
those learning activities and environments (Stoilescu 2015). Teachers need to be supported to
implement this ICT support with school leaders removing barriers to implementation. In
particular, it is important that methods of assessment do not become a barrier and in fact
that we assess what we want students to know how to do, particularly in the application of
STEM skills and knowledge. This is a time of great opportunity to improve STEM learning
for all children, but it is a challenge for Australian teachers and school leaders to grasp and
realise.
Critics :
For the next journal it can be increase of data that can make the explanation more
clear.
Review of journal Research Learning Style Preferences And English Language
Proficiency Of First Year Economics Students At University Of Economics –
Technology For Industries, Vietnam by Dr. Nguyen Thu Ha

 Summary :

This study used the descriptive method of research, employing the survey, comparative and
correlation techniques. Descriptive design endeavored to elucidate, illustrate, and interpret
situations of the present study. It attempted to explore the learning styles and English
language proficiency of students. The study was descriptive as it described the learning style
preferences of the first year Economics students of UNETI, Vietnam. This study used
correlational research design as it determined the presence or absence of relationship between
the learning style preferences and the English language proficiency of the students. Likewise,
it was comparative because it compared the learning styles and language proficiency of the
students. Based on the research, it indicates the learning style preferences of students divided
into six learning styles (visual learning style, auditory learning style, kinesthetic learning
style, tactile learning style, group learning style and individual learning style) according to
the Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire of Roy Reid (1984).As gleaned from
the table, most of students have tactile, auditory, group and kinesthetic learning styles, as
revealed by the weighted means of 3.76, 3.85, 3.85 and 3.87, respectively. This finding shows
that the students possess mixed learning styles. As observed by the researcher in the
classroom, Vietnamese students are more confident when they work in group. They like role
play to practice English and do actions to remember English knowledge. To remember new
words, they want to touch it and they want to listen to it. These learning styles help them
more focus on the content of lessons and remember English easily. Based on the findings of
this study, the first year Economics students at English program to enhance English language
proficiency of students. Based on the research, it indicates the learning style preferences of
students divided into six learning styles (visual learning style, auditory learning style,
kinesthetic learning style, tactile learning style, group learning style and individual learning
style) according to the Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire of Roy Reid
(1984).As gleaned from the table, most of students have tactile, auditory, group and
kinesthetic learning styles, as revealed by the weighted means of 3.76, 3.85, 3.85 and 3.87,
respectively. This finding shows that the students possess mixed learning styles. As observed
by the researcher in the classroom, Vietnamese students are more confident when they work
in group. They like role play to practice English and do actions to remember English
knowledge. To remember new words, they want to touch it and they want to listen to it.
These learning styles help them more focus on the content of lessons and remember English
easily. Based on the findings of this study, the first year Economics students at English
program to enhance English language proficiency of students.

 Judgement :
This journal give us information in detail about English language proficiency and give
the research data in simple table that can easily understand by the readers. This
journal use too much subject of research, so the data is too long and it will make the
reader bored while reading.

 Critics :
English language programs should be designed with relevant learning activities to
meet students’ learning styles. This journal will be more interest if there is variation in
serve the data

You might also like