Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Criminal Appeal Maulvi

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

IN THE COURT OF LEARNED SESSIONS

JUDGE, LAHORE

Appeal No.________________/2008

District. Date of filing Whether filed by the appellant in Stamp on


of appeal. person or agent or counsel. Petition.
Lahore 19-07-2008 MUHAMMAD RASHEED ANSARI 5/-
Advocate High Court
4-Mozang Road, Lahore

Mst. Farhat Bibi W/o Muhammad Shabbir Caste


Kakey Zey R/o House No.29, Street No.14,
Nawankot, Lahore.

APPELLANT

VERSUS

The State.

RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL APPEAL UNDER SECTION 408/410 CR.P.C.


AGAINST THE JUDGMENT OF LEARNED MAGISTRATE
1ST CLASS, LAHORE DATED 16-07-2008

Caste FIR No.690/2002,


Offence U/S 337-L2/F1/354/34 P.P.C.
Police Station: Baghbanpura, District Lahore

SENTENCE. Appellant is convicted U/s 337-L(2) PPC……


Daman of Rs. 5000/- payable to Rukhsana
Bibi.
U/s 337-F1 PPC, three months R.I. and fine of
Rs. 2000/-…….. in default ten days S.I.

Benefit of Section 382-B Cr.P.C. is also given


to the appellant.

The Learned Trial Court has directed to


appellant/convict for submission of surety
bond to the tune of Rs. 50,000/- with one
surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of
this Court. (Trial Court).

Respectfully Sheweth:-

a. That the appellant was convicted on 16-07-2008 by the

Learned Magistrate 1st Class, Lahore Cantt. as

mentioned supra.

GROUNDS OF APPEAL.

1. That the judgment of Learned Trial Court is

against the law and facts of the case as borne

by record.

2. That the appellant is a lady and belongs to a

respectable family.

3. That there are contradictions in occular

account.

4. That there are conflicts between medical

evidence and occular account.


5. That co-accused has been acquitted on the

same evidence by the Learned Trial Court.

6. That occular account is not reliable for

conviction as it does not inspire confidence.

PRAYER
Under the circumstances, it is
respectfully prayed that the appeal may very kindly
be accepted and the impugned judgement dated
16.07.2008 passed by the Learned Trial Court may
kindly be set aside and the appellant may kindly be
acquitted from the charge.

APPELLANT

Through

MUHAMMAD RASHEED ANSARI


Advocate High Court,
4-Mozang Road, Lahore

Dated: 19.07.2008.

CERTIFICATE.

As per instructions this is the first appeal on the subject


before this Honourable Court.

ADVOCATE.

IN THE COURT OF LEARNED SESSIONS


JUDGE, LAHORE
Appeal No.________________/2008

Mst. Farhat Bibi VERSUS The State

INDEX

Sr. No. Description of Documents Dated Annex Pages


1. Criminal Appeal 19-07-2008 1-3
2. Judgement 16-07-2008 A 4-11
3. Power of Attorney

APPELLANT

Through

MUHAMMAD RASHEED ANSARI


Advocate High Court,
4-Mozang Road, Lahore

Dated: 19.07.2008.

You might also like