Smart HAZOP
Smart HAZOP
Smart HAZOP
• The existing work process is not robust enough to codify the lessons learnt from
the past process safety incidents/near misses
➢ Relies on the team members knowledge to incorporate the learnings
• The HAZOP review duration may range between a couple of hours and multiple
weeks, depending on the scope
➢ Time consuming activity with multiple people involved
➢ For a longer duration, there is a potential to have fatigue which may
potentially affect the quality
Innovation
• Critical Components
➢ Base Documents
➢ Software
➢ Grouping of Hazards and Concerns
• Methodology
Base Documents
• The SHE hazards and the operability concerns that could be possibly present in
any process facility can be grouped into:
➢ Equipment (e.g. compressor, fired heater)
➢ Process Material (e.g. flammable, cryogenic)
➢ Process Technology (e.g. runaway reaction)
➢ Hazardous Inventory (e.g. storage quantity)
➢ Siting & Layout (e.g. atmospheric vent discharge)
➢ Activity (e.g. routine, non-routine)
• The HAZOP review is one of the critical tools that provides the handle to the
process industries to identify the SHE hazards so that the hazards can be
managed properly
• It is important to ensure that the rigor of the HAZOP review is not affected by the
variations in the team members knowledge, skills and work experiences
• With the application knowledge and experience that has been gained by the
industry practioners over the last 50 years, there is a possibility to automate the
HAZOP review
Summary
• Thanks to all my friends, colleagues, ex-colleagues and the HAZOP review team
members with whom I had great interactions while chairing the HAZOP reviews
for the past 14 years
• Thanks to Creative Commons for making the pictures (used in this presentation)
publicly available for use
Thanks and Questions