Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Empowerment Through Curriculum Development PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 19

EMPOWERMENT THROUGH

CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT

Prof Arend E Carl, Vice-Dean (Teaching), Faculty of Education,


University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa (aec2@sun.ac.za)
Website of US: http//www.sun.ac.za
EMPOWERMENT: THE
CONCEPT
EXAMPLES OF TITLES FROM THE
LITERATURE ON TEACHER/LECTURER
INVOLVEMENT IN CURRICULUM
DEVELOPMENT
 “Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy
of learning”
 “Teaching effectiveness and teacher development”
 “A teacher guide to classroom research”
 “Leading schools in times of change”
 “The new meaning of educational change”
 “Dynamic teachers: Leaders of change”
 “Understanding teacher development”
 “Curriculum Leadership”
EXAMPLES OF TITLES (Continued)
 “Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of
experience”
 “The teacher as expert”
 “Teachers and their workplace: Commitment,
performance and productivity”
 “Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues and
contexts”
 “Teachers who lead: The rhetoric of reform and the
realities of practice”
 “Teacher empowerment through curriculum
development”
• An analogy with music: “… teachers are in
charge of live performances and, like
conductors, they do not usually write the
scores they interpret. … (T)eachers are like
conductors, while curriculum developers are
like composers” (Martin- Kniep en Uhrmacher (1992: 261)
• Danger of “… separation of conception from
execution” (Apple (1986:178-179)
“CURRICULUM
DEVELOPMENT IS NOT DONE
SOMETHING TO LECTURERS,
BUT THROUGH AND WITH
THEM”(Rees)
ARE LECTURERS MERE RECEIVERS OR
CHANGE AGENTS?
What are the dangers of not being creatively
involved in curriculum development?
THE COMPLEX WORLD OF THE
TEACHER/ LECTURER
FOUR CRITICAL ELEMENTS
 Strong knowledge base
 Quality controls (assessment and evaluation)
 Resources (salaries, resources, material, etc.)
 Conditions of practice
SPHERES OF INFLUENCE
 Society
 University
 State
 School
 College of Education
“In combination with the characteristics of a profession,
the interaction among the spheres of influence form a
dynamic, constantly changing supra-system defined
here as the total context in which teachers (lecturers)
operate”. (Corrigan & Haberman, 1995)
BE CONFIDENT TO TAKE RISKS AND
BECOME INVOLVED
DO WE WANT TO CONFORM (more of the
same) OR BECOME INVOLVED
INDEPENDENTLY IN A CREATIVE WAY?
SOME PREFER A RIGID CURRICULUM AS IT
MIGHT PROVIDE SOME SECURITY, WHILST
OTHERS SEE IT AS AN OBSTACLE TO
CREATIVITY
“the ultimate goal of change is when
people see themselves as shareholders
with a stake in the success of the system
as a whole, with the pursuit of meaning as
the elusive key” (M Fullan. 2001: 11)
TWO APPROACHES
SOCRATIC approach:

 Active participation and interaction


 Discoverers of knowledge
 Independent decision making
 Creators of knowledge

Scholastic approach:

 “Top-down” approach
 Transmission
 Applies exactly as received
 Design is done “elsewhere” and
teachers must just apply it
BERNSTEIN’S LEVELS OF
DISCOURSE
1. Production of discourse:
Creation of knowledge in the
disciplines

2. Reconceptualization of discourse:
Giving meaning, e.g. by
education departments, syllabus
development

3. Reproduction of discourse:
Teachers implement and apply
pre-conceived ideas
WHAT DOES
EMPOWERMENT MEAN
FOR ME AS A LECTURER
WHO HAS TO TRAIN
THEOLOGIANS?
• ‘Empowerment embodies a notion of power as
external, power which can be given, which can be
provided, power as property. Power must be
something which can be controlled. It implies some
kind of vision.’ (Gore, 1989:3)
•… empowerment is to allow participation and give
equal power in decision-making … especially to
those who have been kept out. It means giving
power to the teacher to decide what will be taught
and how it will be taught. Empowerment has to do
with things such as sharing of power, the right to
participate, the right to articulate oneself and be
heard, equality and accommodation. Empowerment
is seen as something external to the teacher and
something that “is given to the teacher” (Singh’s
2003)
• ‘... the overcoming of workplace alienation and
• Empowerment includes empowering strategies that capitalise on
peoples’ ability to understand their own needs and that build on the
energy and strengths people have (Sleeter 1991:4)
• True empowerment leads to a growth in professionalism as
teachers become involved with and take responsibility for decisions
taken by them (Melenyzer 1990)
• … teachers must be allowed to make their own decisions
(Zeichner 1991:365)
• .. greater professionalization and it is put most strikingly as
follows: ‘... the power to exercise one's craft.’ They go further and
say: ‘It is the extent to which teachers practice autonomous
behaviour while maintaining collegial interaction, giving attention to
... needs, accepting responsibility and accountability, ...
participating in group problem solving to determine collectively the
goals and direction of the school.’ (Kavina and Tanaka, 1991:115)
• “Freedom is not the absence of structure – letting employees go
off and do whatever they want – but rather a clear structure which
enables people to work within established boundaries in a creative
and autonomous way” (RM Kanter)
‘Empowerment is that process of development and
growth through which a person goes which enables
him/her to take independent decisions and to act
autonomously and independently with a view to making
a contribution towards the development of his or her
particular environment. This process is coupled with the
development of applicable skills, attitudes and
knowledge within a positive and democratic climate.
These persons are therefore regarded as professionals
in their own right as they are able to make a contribution
to change through their particular power.’
(Carl, 2009: 7)

You might also like