SoRDECon Program Invitation PDF
SoRDECon Program Invitation PDF
SoRDECon Program Invitation PDF
LUNCH BREAK
AFTERNOON SESSION Part II – Parallel Sessions
12:30PM Presentation and Critiquing of Researches
4:30 PM Awarding of Certificates to Evaluators & Presenters
LUNCH BREAK
RD/E BOOT DISPLAY VISIT
RD/E POSTER DISPLAY VISIT
11:00 AM Evaluation
Insights:
HEI Representative
Students Representative
Faculty Participant
Academic Exchange
LUNCH BREAK
1:00 PM Sorsogon HEI’s Session: Dr. Gerry A. Carretero
CHEERS Moderator
Benchmarking Activities
PANEL OF EVALUATORS
1st Student R&D Contest
High School Level
Criteria Scoring
Originality (Provision of new ideas and proper acknowledgment of sources) 10%
Technical Merit of the Study (Adequacy and clarity of the objectives,
rationale, state-of-the-art, and methodology) 20%
Significance of the Findings (Superiority, contribution, and usefulness of
outputs to science, art, industry for community development) 40%
Manuscript Write-up (Appropriateness, accuracy, and clarity of language
and figures) 10%
Presentation and Oral Defense (Clarity, logic and uniqueness of the
presentation and response to queries) 20%
TOTAL 100%
*Criteria is based on SSC REMO (BOT Res. No. 62, s. 2017)
Education, Literature & Curriculum Development
Moderator : Dr. Minerva J. Hubilla
Rapporteur : Ms. Cristy D. Dioneda
Tabulator : Mr. Anthony L. Madrazo
4 “The Devices of Satire in Bobis’ Fish Hair Woman: A Call for change”
(Dr. Sherill A. Gilbas*)
Institutional Development
Moderator : Dr. Leny D. Berdin
Rapporteur : Ms. Frances Grace D. Jetomo
Tabulator : Mr. Richard Justin Duran
Criteria Scoring
Significance of the project (Over-all contribution to the
development of the community) 40%
Institutional support and partnership established
(Established active partnership and linkages with the LGU, 20%
NGA, Industries, NGOs and other stakeholders)
Manuscript Write-up and Presentation (Appropriateness,
accuracy, and clarity of language and figures in the paper and 20%
oral presentation)
Sustainability and Impact to the Community
Beneficiaries (Modalities employed led towards project 20%
sustainability and adoption of the community beneficiaries
and/or partners)
TOTAL 100%
*Criteria is based on SSC REMO (BOT Res. No. 62, s. 2017)
Extension Projects
Moderator : Mr. Franklin L. Calaminos
Rapporteur : Ms. Janine L. Conde
Tabulator : Ms. Karen Mae H. Palabrica
Criteria Scoring
Originality (Provision of new ideas and proper acknowledgment of 10%
sources)
Technical Merit of the Study (Adequacy and clarity of the objectives,
rationale, state-of-the-art, and methodology) 20%
Significance of the Findings (Superiority, contribution, and usefulness
of outputs to science, art, industry for community development) 40%
Manuscript Write-up (Appropriateness, accuracy, and clarity of 10%
language and figures)
Presentation and Oral Defense (Clarity, logic and uniqueness of the
presentation and response to queries) 20%
TOTAL 100%
HIGH SCHOOL CATEGORY
Moderator : Ms. Justeen Frances D. Manuel
Rapporteur : Ms. Cristy D. Dioneda
Tabulator : Mr. Anthony L. Madrazo
“Seafood Crackers”
3 (Joebert Leron and Abraham Frayres)
******
SSC, SSC
Our beloved institution
SSC, SSC
You are the pride of Sorsogon
MISSION
A premiere Institution committed to provide industry-
relevant programs that are anchored on a culture of
research and entrepreneurship for the development
of Sorsogon and beyond
CORE VALUES
L - Leadership
E - Excellence
A - Accountability
D - Discipline
E - Environmental Stewardship
R - Responsiveness to change
S - Social Responsibility