Answers+ IB
Answers+ IB
Answers+ IB
Export
Exporting is the most traditional way of entering into International Business. Export can be
done in two ways:
1. Direct Export – Products are sold directly to buyers in target markets either through local
sales representatives or distributors. Sales representatives promote their company’s
products and do not take title to the merchandise. Distributors take ownership of the goods
(and the accompanying risk) and usually on-sell through wholesalers and retailers to end-
users.
2. Indirect Export - Products are sold through intermediaries such as agents and trading
companies. Agents may represent one or more indirect exporters in return for commission
on sales.
Depending on the industry sector and type of business, a foreign direct investment may be an
attractive and viable option. With rapid globalization of many industries and vertical integration
rapidly taking place on a global level, at a minimum a firm needs to keep abreast of global trends
in their industry. From a competitive standpoint, it is important to be aware of whether a
company’s competitors are expanding into a foreign market and how they are doing that. Often,
it becomes imperative to follow the expansion of key clients overseas if an active business
relationship is to be maintained.
New market access is also another major reason to invest in a foreign country. At some stage,
export of product or service reaches a critical mass of amount and cost where foreign production
or location begins to be more cost effective. Any decision on investing is thus a combination of a
number of key factors including:
o Assessment of internal resources
o Competitiveness
o Market Analysis
o Market expectations
Licensing
Licensing is a legal agreement between the owner of intellectual property such as a copyright,
patent or trademark and someone who wants to use that IP. The licensee pays “rent” to the
licensor for the use of an idea/product/process that is otherwise protected by IP law. Like a lease
on a building, the license is for a specific period of time. The licensee uses that
idea/product/process to sell products or services and earns money.
Advantages:
o Licensing appeals to prospective global players because it does not require large capital
investment not detailed involvement with foreign customers. By generating royalty income,
licensing provides an opportunity to exploit research and development already conducted.
After initial costs, the licensor can reap benefits until the end of license contract period.
o It reduces the risk of expropriation because the licensee is a local company that can provide
leverage against government action.
o Helps avoid host country regulations that are more prevalent in equity ventures.
o Provides a way of testing foreign markets without significant resources.
o Can be used as a preemption major in new market before the entry of competition.
Limitations:
o Limited form of market entry which does not guarantee a basis for expansion.
o Licensor may create more competition in exchange of royalty.
Franchising
Franchising involves granting of rights by a parent company to another (franchisee) to do
business in a prescribed manner. This right can take the form of selling the franchiser’s
products, using its name, production and marketing techniques or using its general business
approach.
Franchise agreement typically requires the payment of a fee upfront and then a percentage on
sales. In return, the franchiser provides assistance and at times may require the purchase of
goods or supplies to ensure the same quality of goods or services worldwide.
Franchising is adaptable to international arena and requires minor modification for the local
market. It can be beneficial to both groups. Franchiser has a new stream of income and the
franchisee gets time proven concept/product which can be quickly bought to the market.
Joint Ventures
A joint venture is an agreement involving two or more organizations that arrange to produce a
product or service through a collectively owned enterprise. It has been one of the most popular
way of entering a new market.
Typically, it is a 50-50 joint venture in which each of the party holds 50% ownership stake and
contributes a team of managers to share operating control. At times, this stake can be a majority
one so as to ensure tighter control.
Advantages:
o Domestic company brings in the knowledge of the domestic market.
o The risk is divided between joint-venture partners.
o Normally, foreign partner has an option to sell its stake in the venture to another entity.
Limitations:
o Limited control over business approach for foreign entity.
o Profits have to be shared.
e.g. Danone-Brittania, Hero Honda, Maruti Suzuki
In this case, the India can produce more of each good with the same set of resources than China
can. The India could produce either 200 units of shoes or 160 units of shirts. China could
produce either 160 units of shoes or 150 units of shirts. If the India produces only shoes, it gives
up 80 units of shirts to gain 100 units of shoes. If China produces only shoes, it gives up 75 units
of shirts to gain 80 units of shoes. For India, the opportunity cost of producing shirts is higher
and the opportunity cost of producing shoes is lower; vice-versa for China. Hence, India has a
comparative advantage in shoemaking and China has a comparative advantage in shirt
making.
Table D shows what happens when each country specializes in the product in which it has a
comparative advantage.
TABLE D
Shoes Shirts
India 200 0
China 0 150
Total 200 150
By specializing in this way, the India and China have increased the production of shoes by
twenty units over what they produced before, from 180 to 200. But the world has lost five units
of shirts, going from 155 to 150.
Production in the India could be adjusted to make up the difference. For example, if the India
gave up 10 units of shoes, it could produce 8 units of shirts. Table E shows the results of such a
tradeoff.
TABLE E
Shoes Shirts
India 190 8
China 0 150
Total 190 158
For example, a country where capital and land are abundant but labour is scarce will have
comparative advantage in goods that require lots of capital and land, but little labour - grains,
for example.
Since capital and land are abundant, their prices will be low. Those low prices will ensure that
the price of the grain that they are used to produce will also be low - and thus attractive for both
local consumption and export.
Labor intensive goods on the other hand will be very expensive to produce since labor is scarce
and its price is high. Therefore, the country is better off importing those goods.
Summary
Factor endowments vary among countries
Products differ according to the types of factors that they need as inputs
A country has a comparative advantage in producing products that intensively use
factors of production (resources) it has in abundance
Assumptions
A given technology was universally available.
Relative factor endowments are different in each country
Tastes and preferences are identical in both countries
A given product was either labor- or capital-intensive
The theory ignored transportation costs.
The WTO came into being on January 1, 1995, and is the successor to the General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which was created in 1948. India was one of the 76 countries that
signed the accession to the WTO and is one of the founder members of the WTO.
Disadvantages:
1. TRIPS: the Indian Patent Act is not compatible with the TRIPS agreement under the WTO.
The Indian Patent Act allows only process patents in areas of foods, chemicals and
medicines. Under the TRIPS the IPA will have to modify to allow product patents also. Also
products developed outside India can claim international patents applicable to India. This
will hurt our agriculture foods. E.g. the Alphanso mango and the Basmati strand
controversy.
2. Drug prices: the granting of the product patents in India will hurt the Indian generic drugs
industry and benefit the foreign pharma companies that own the formulation patents. This
will lead to increase in drug prices in India. (This resulted in regulatory intervention in the
recent budget in life saving drugs) e.g. the Pfizer controversy
3. Genetics: Indian seed and genetic research organizations are Government funded and will
not be able to compete with the MNCs like Montessanto etc that have economies of scale.
This will increase seed prices for Indian farmers and also lend our genetic resources to the
MNCs
4. Services: the opening up of the banking sector in 2009 will affect Indian banks due to the
foreign banks with huge balance sheets.
5. TRIMS: the Trade Related Investment Measures resulted in problems in trade in investment
issues like transit charges, formalities etc. together called as Singapore issues. Indian
companies would have to lose in the differential charges that are applied. These issues were
dropped in the Chachun ministerial conferences.
6. Anti dumping: the anti dumping rules were imposed on Indian linen in EU. Similarly Indian
textiles faced anti dumping regulations in US. There is no mechanism to resolve anti
dumping duties issues.
India’s stand in the Doha round and the following ministerial conferences:
1. Doha round: The Doha Development Round commenced at Doha, Qatar in November
2001 and is still continuing. Its objective is to lower trade barriers around the world,
permitting free trade between countries of varying prosperity. As of 2008, talks have stalled
over a divide between the developed nations led by the European Union, the United States
and Japan and the major developing countries (represented by the G20 developing nations),
led and represented mainly by India, Brazil, China and South Africa.
Issues: Singapore issues: the issues related to the trade facilitation and differential charges in
investment vehicles affected Indian investment and venture companies. This affected the Indian
services.
Agricultural subsidies: the EU, US and Japan support domestic agriculture by subsides. This
was opposed by countries like India and Brazil.
2. Cancun conference 2003 :
The objective of this conference was to forge the agreement discussed in Doha.
Issues: market access to foreign markets. This agreement on market access for the developing
countries in capital and industrial goods increased strength of G20 countries.
India benefited greatly in the capital goods export.
The Singapore issues were resolved that resulted in removing the undue advantage for countries
like US and Japan in investment arena. This also benefited the Indian financial sector
internationally.
3. Geneva 2004: In Geneva conference the developed nations reduced subsidiaries on
manufactured goods. This resulted in Indian small manufacturers like steel forging, casting
to export largely and benefit from the construction boom in US.
4. Paris 2005: France reduced subsidies on farm products. However US and Japan did not
relent.
Hong Kong 2006 and Potsdam 2007 talks failed in resolving the farm subsidies. So the recent
rounds are in a stalemate situation from India’s point of view.
The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) is an economic and political
organization of eight countries in Southern Asia. It was established on December 8, 1985 by
India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Maldives and Bhutan. In April 2007, at the
Association's 14th summit, Afghanistan became its eighth member.Sheelkant Sharma is the
current secretary & Mahinda Rajapaksa is the current chairman of SAARC which is
headquartered at Kathmandu.
Objectives of SAARC:
to promote the welfare of the peoples of South Asia and to improve their quality of life;
to accelerate economic growth, social progress and cultural development in the region
and to provide all individuals the opportunity to live in dignity and to realize their full
potential;
to promote and strengthen collective self-reliance among the countries of South Asia;
to contribute to mutual trust, understanding and appreciation of one another's
problems;
to promote active collaboration and mutual assistance in the economic, social, cultural,
technical and scientific fields;
to strengthen cooperation with other developing countries;
to strengthen cooperation among themselves in international forums on matters of
common interest; and
to cooperate with international and regional organizations with similar aims and
purposes.
Free Trade Agreement
Over the years, the SAARC members have expressed their unwillingness on signing a free trade
agreement. Though India has several trade pacts with Maldives, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka,
similar trade agreements with Pakistan and Bangladesh have been stalled due to political and
economic concerns on both sides. India has been constructing a barrier across its borders with
Bangladesh and Pakistan. In 1993, SAARC countries signed an agreement to gradually lower
tariffs within the region, in Dhaka. Eleven years later, at the 12th SAARC Summit at Islamabad,
SAARC countries devised the South Asia Free Trade Agreement which created a framework for
the establishment of a free trade area covering 1.4 billion people. This agreement went into force
on January 1, 2006. Under this agreement, SAARC members will bring their duties down to 20
per cent by 2007.
The last summit (15th) was held in Colombo where four major agreements - the SAARC
development fund, the establishment of a SAARC standard organization, the SAARC convention
on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, and the protocol on Afghanistan's admission to
the South Asia Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) were adopted with emphasis on region-wide
food security.
NAFTA
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a trilateral trade bloc in North America
created by the governments of the United States, Canada, and Mexico. In terms of combined
purchasing power parity GDP of its members, as of 2007 the trade bloc is the largest in the
world and second largest by nominal GDP comparison. It also is one of the most powerful, wide-
reaching treaties in the world.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has two supplements, the North American
Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC) and the North American Agreement on
Labor Cooperation (NAALC).
Implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) began on January 1,
1994. This agreement will remove most barriers to trade and investment among the United
States, Canada, and Mexico.
Under the NAFTA, all non-tariff barriers to agricultural trade between the United States and
Mexico were eliminated. In addition, many tariffs were eliminated immediately, with others
being phased out over periods of 5 to 15 years. This allowed for an orderly adjustment to free
trade with Mexico, with full implementation beginning January 1, 2008.
The agricultural provisions of the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement, in effect since 1989, were
incorporated into the NAFTA. Under these provisions, all tariffs affecting agricultural trade
between the United States and Canada, with a few exceptions for items covered by tariff-rate
quotas, were removed by January 1, 1998.
Mexico and Canada reached a separate bilateral NAFTA agreement on market access for
agricultural products. The Mexican-Canadian agreement eliminated most tariffs either
immediately or over 5, 10, or 15 years.
U.S. trade with Mexico and Canada has grown more rapidly than total U.S. trade since 1994. The
automotive, textile, and apparel industries have experienced the most significant changes in
trade flows, which may also have affected employment levels in these industries. The five major
U.S. industries that have high volumes of trade with Mexico and Canada are automotive
industry, chemicals and allied products, computer equipment, textiles and apparel, and
microelectronics.
The effects of NAFTA, both positive and negative, have been quantified by several economists.
Some argue that NAFTA has been positive for Mexico, which has seen its poverty rates fall and
real income rise (in the form of lower prices, especially food), even after accounting for the
1994–1995 economic crisis. Others argue that NAFTA has been beneficial to business owners
and elites in all three countries, but has had negative impacts on farmers in Mexico who saw
food prices fall based on cheap imports from U.S. agribusiness, and negative impacts on U.S.
workers in manufacturing and assembly industries who lost jobs. Critics also argue that NAFTA
has contributed to the rising levels of inequality in both the U.S. and Mexico.
EU
The European Union (EU) is a political and economic union of 27 member states, located
primarily in Europe. The EU generates an estimated 30% share of the world's nominal gross
domestic product (US$16.8 trillion in 2007). Thus EU presents an enormous export and
investor market that is both mature and sophisticated.
The EU has developed a single market through a standardised system of laws which apply in all
member states, guaranteeing the freedom of movement of people, goods, services and capital. It
maintains a common trade policy. Fifteen member states have adopted a common currency, the
euro.
Objectives of the EU: Its principal goal is to promote and expand cooperation among
members’ states in economics, trade, social issues, foreign policies, security, defense, and
judicial matters. Another major goal of the EU is to implement the Economic and Monetary
Union, which introduced a single currency, the Euro for the EU members.
The single market refers to the creation of a fully integrated market within the EU, which allows
for free movement of goods, services and factors of production. The EU, in conjunction with
Member States, has a number of policies designed to assist the functioning of the market. Some
of the policies are given below:
Competition Policy: The main competition lied in energy and transport sector. The union
designed this strategy to prevent price fixing, collusion (secret agreement), and abuse of
monopoly.
Free movement of goods: A custom union covering all trade in goods was established and a
common customs tariff was adopted with respect to countries outside the union.
Services: Any member nation has a right to provide services in other Member States.
Free movement of persons: Any citizen of EU member state can live work in any other EU
member state
Capital: There are no restrictions on the movement of capital and on payments with the EU and
between member states and third countries.
Trade between the European Union and India
India was one of the first Asian nations to accord recognition to the European Community in
1962. The EU is India’s largest trading partner and biggest source of FDI. It is a major
contributor of developmental aid and an important source of technology. Over the years, EU –
India trade has grown from 4.4 bn to 28.4 bn US$.
Top items of trade between India and EU
India’s exports to EU % India’s Imports from EU %
Textile and clothing 35 Gemstones and jewellery 31
Leather and leather products 25 Power generating equipment 28
Gemstones and jewelery 12 Chemical products 15
Agriculture products 10 Office machinery 10
Chemical products 9 Transport equipment 6
India is EU’s 17 largest supplier and 20 largest destination for exports.
th th
Tariff and non-tariffs have been reduced, but compared to International standards they are
still high.
Under the Bilateral trade between India and EU, it accounts for 26% of India’s exports and
25% of its imports.
The European Union (EU) and India agreed on September 29,2008 at the EU-India summit
in Marseille, France's largest commercial port, to expand their cooperation in the fields of
nuclear energy and environmental protection and deepen their strategic partnership.
Trade between India and the 27-nation EU has more than doubled from 25.6 billion euros
($36.7 billion) in 2000 to 55.6 billion euros last year, with further expansion to be seen.
ASEAN
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations or ASEAN was established on 8 August 1967 in
Bangkok by the five original Member Countries, namely, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines,
Singapore, and Thailand. Brunei Darussalam joined on 8 January 1984, Vietnam on 28 July
1995, Laos and Myanmar on 23 July 1997, and Cambodia on 30 April 1999.
OBJECTIVES
The ASEAN Declaration states that the aims and purposes of the Association are:
(i) To accelerate the economic growth, social progress and cultural development in the
region through joint endeavors.
(ii) To promote regional peace and stability through abiding respect for justice and the rule
of law in the relationship among countries in the region and adherence to the principles
of the United Nations Charter.
(iii) To maintain close cooperation with the existing international and regional organizations
with similar aims.
WORKING OF ASEAN
The member countries of ASEAN have Preferential Trading Arrangements (PTA), which reduces
tariffs on products traded among member countries. In 1992, ASEAN developed a Common
Effective Preferential Tariffs (CEPT) plan to reduce tariffs systematically for manufactured and
processed products.
The members have also established a series of co-operative efforts to encourage joint
participation in industrial, agricultural and technical development projects and to increase
foreign investments in their economies. These efforts include an ASEAN finance corporation,
the ASEAN Industrial Joint Ventures Programme (AJIV) etc. ASEAN nations have introduced
some programmes for greater diversification in their economies.
India and ASEAN
India is interested in maintaining close economic relations with the members of ASEAN, as
these countries are closer to India. The ASEAN countries are offering co-operation to India in
the field of trade, investment, science and technology and training of personnel. Also, India’s
trade with ASEAN countries is satisfactory in recent years.
Douglas Wind and Pelmutter advocated four approaches of international business. They are:
1. Echnocentric Approach
The domestic companies normally formulate their strategies, their product design and their
operations towards the national markets, customers and competitors. But, the excessive
production more than the demand for the product, either due to competition or due to
changes in customer preferences push the company to export the excessive production to
foreign countries. The domestic company continues the exports to the foreign countries and
views the foreign markets as an extension to the domestic markets just like a new region.
The executives at the head office of the company make the decisions relating to exports and,
the marketing personnel of the domestic company monitor the export operations with the
help of an export department. The company exports the same product designed for domestic
markets to foreign countries under this approach. Thus, maintenance of domestic approach
towards international business is called ethnocentric approach.
2. Polycentric Approach
The domestic companies, which are exporting to foreign countries using the ethnocentric
approach, find at the latter stage that the foreign markets need an altogether different
approach. Then, the company establishes a foreign subsidiary company and decentralists all
the operations and delegate decision making and policy-making authority to its executives.
In fact, the company appoints executives and personnel including a chief executive who
reports directly to the Managing Director of the company. Company appoints the key
personnel from the home country and the people of the host country fill all other vacancies.
3. Regiocentric Approach
The company after operating successfully in a foreign country thinks of exporting to the
neighboring countries of the host country. At this stage, the foreign subsidiary considers the
regions environment (for example, Asian environment like laws, culture, policies etc.) for
formulating policies and strategies. However, it markets more or less the same product designed
under polycentric approach in other countries of the region, but with different market strategies.
4. Geocentric approach
Under this approach, the entire world is just like a single country for the company. They
select the employees from the entire globe and operate with a number of subsidiaries. The
headquarters coordinate the activities of the subsidiaries. Each subsidiary functions like an
independent and autonomous company in formulating policies, strategies, product design,
human resource policies, operations etc.
The following are some of the important factors, which make international HRM complex and
challenging:
CULTURAL DIFFERENCES
Besides the tenancy of employment, there are several conditions of employment the
differences of which cause significant challenge to international HRM.
The system of rewards, promotion, incentives and motivation, system of labour welfare
and social security etc., vary significantly between countries.
G20
WHAT IS THE G-20
The Group of Twenty (G-20) Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors was established in
1999 to bring together systemically important industrialized and developing economies to
discuss key issues in the global economy. The inaugural meeting of the G-20 took place in
Berlin, on December 15 & 16, 1999, hosted by German and Canadian finance ministers.
MANDATE
The G-20 is an informal forum that promotes open and constructive discussion between
industrial and emerging-market countries on key issues related to global economic stability. By
contributing to the strengthening of the international financial architecture and providing
opportunities for dialogue on national policies, international co-operation, and international
financial institutions, the G-20 helps to support growth and development across the globe.
ORIGINS
The G-20 was created as a response both to the financial crises of the late 1990s and to a
growing recognition that key emerging-market countries were not adequately included in
the core of global economic discussion and governance.
The proposals made by the G-22 and the G-33 to reduce the world economy's
susceptibility to crises showed the potential benefits of a regular international
consultative forum embracing the emerging-market countries.
Such a regular dialogue with a constant set of partners was institutionalized by the
creation of the G-20 in 1999.
MEMBERSHIP
The G-20 is made up of the finance ministers and central bank governors of 19 countries:
Argentina
Australia
Brazil
Canada
China
France
Germany
India
Indonesia
Italy
Japan
Mexico
Russia
Saudi Arabia
South Africa
South Korea
Turkey
United Kingdom
The European Union, who is represented by the rotating Council presidency and the
European Central Bank, is the 20th member of the G-20.
To ensure global economic for a and institutions work together, the Managing Director of
the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the President of the World Bank, plus the
chairs of the International Monetary and Financial Committee and Development
Committee of the IMF and World Bank, also participate in G-20 meetings on an ex-
officio basis.
The G-20 thus brings together important industrial and emerging-market countries from
all regions of the world. Together, member countries represent around 90 per cent of
global gross national product, 80 per cent of world trade (including EU intra-trade) as
well as two-thirds of the world's population.
The G-20's economic weight and broad membership gives it a high degree of legitimacy
and influence over the management of the global economy and financial system.
ACHIEVEMENTS
The G-20 has progressed a range of issues since 1999, including agreement about policies
for growth, reducing abuse of the financial system, dealing with financial crises and
combating terrorist financing.
The G-20 also aims to foster the adoption of internationally recognized standards through
the example set by its members in areas such as the transparency of fiscal policy and
combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism.
The G-20 has also aimed to develop a common view among members on issues related to
further development of the global economic and financial system and held an
extraordinary meeting in the margins of the 2008 IMF and World Bank annual meetings
in recognition of the current economic situation.
It is normal practice for the G-20 finance ministers and central bank governors to meet
once a year.
The ministers' and governors' meeting is usually preceded by two deputies' meetings and
extensive technical work.
This technical work takes the form of workshops, reports and case studies on specific
subjects, that aim to provide ministers and governors with contemporary analysis and
insights, to better inform their consideration of policy challenges and options.
The participation of the President of the World Bank, the Managing Director of the IMF
and the chairs of the International Monetary and Financial Committee and the
Development Committee in the G-20 meetings ensures that the G-20 process is well
integrated with the activities of the Bretton Woods Institutions.
The G-20 also works with, and encourages, other international groups and organizations,
such as the Financial Stability Forum, in progressing international and domestic
economic policy reforms. In addition, experts from private-sector institutions and non-
government organisations are invited to G-20 meetings on an ad hoc basis in order to
exploit synergies in analyzing selected topics and avoid overlap.
EXTERNAL COMMUNICATION
The country currently chairing the G-20 posts details of the group's meetings and work
program on a dedicated website.
Although participation in the meetings is reserved for members, the public is informed
about what was discussed and agreed immediately after the meeting of ministers and
governors has ended.
After each meeting of ministers and governors, the G-20 publishes a communiqué which
records the agreements reached and measures outlined. Material on the forward work
program is also made public.