Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

07 Legaspi vs. CSC

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Legaspi vs.

Civil Service Commission

Facts:

- Petitioner Valentin L. Legaspi filed for Mandamus to compel respondent Civil Service
Commission to release information on the civil service eligibilities of persons employed as
sanitarians (Julian Sibonghanoy and Mariano Agas) in the Health department of Cebu City.
- OSG contends that petitioner has no locus standi as he failed to show his actual interest.
- The Court ruled however that the petition on mandamus is anchored upon the right of the
people for information on matters of public concern which is a public right.
o The petitioner being a citizen warrants standing in this part
o The State and its agents are mandated by the constitution by virtue of sec. 7 Article III
and Sec. 28, Article II. (Policy of Full public Disclosure)

Issue:

- Whether or not respondent should release the information. YES

Ruling:

- The constitutional right to information on matter of public information is grounded on Sec. 7


Article III and Sec. 28, Article II of the 1987 Constitution. These are self-executory.
o In the case at bar, the government agency Civil Service Commission does not have the
discretion to prohibit the access to information sought. It only has the authority to
regulate the manner of examination
- These constitutional guarantees, however, are not absolute as they are “subject to the
limitations as may be provided by law” (Art. III Sec. 7 2nd sentence). The information sought
must not be exempted by law.
o In the case at bar, the information is within the enumerations provided by law.
 The information sought to be retrieved sought relates to a public office which
can be considered as a legitimate concern of citizens
 Respondent failed to cite any provision in the Civil Service Law which would
limit the petitioner’s right to know who are, and who are not civil service eligible
and
 Civil service exam results are released in the public.
- Government agencies such as the Civil Service commission do not have the discretion in refusing
disclosure of or access to information of public concern.
- The information sought by petitioner is considered “public concern/ interest”.
o There is no rigid test as the term “public concern/ interest” is broad. It is for the courts
to determine if the information falls within public concern or public interest.

You might also like