Experiment 6
Experiment 6
Experiment 6
the rate equation is normally written as (Armenise, Garcia-Bordeje, Valverde, Romeo, &
Monzon, 2013)
𝑟 = 𝑘[𝐴]𝑥 [𝐵]𝑦
2𝑁𝐻3 → 3𝐻2 + 𝑁2
where r is the rate of reaction, k is the rate
constant, x is the order of the reaction with respect Moving on, first order reactions are reactions
to reactant A and y is the order of reaction with whose rates depend on the concentration of only
respect to reactant B. In addition, one may also one reactant (unimolecular reactions), albeit
express the rate of a chemical reaction by multiple reactants may be present in a reaction.
obtaining the differential of one specie with Considering the same reaction as before, but now
respect to time, as shown below. first order with respect to A, the differential
equation would be
1 𝑑[𝐴] 1 𝑑[𝐵] 1 𝑑[𝐶] 1 𝑑[𝐷]
𝑟= − =− = = [𝐴] 𝑡
𝑎 𝑑𝑡 𝑏 𝑑𝑡 𝑐 𝑑𝑡 𝑑 𝑑𝑡 𝑑[𝐴]
∫ = ∫ −𝑎𝑘𝑑𝑡
The reaction rate is always positive and so the [𝐴]𝑜 [𝐴] 0
negative sign denotes that the reactants are being
consumed in the reaction, thus their amount yielding an integrated rate law of the form
decreases over time. With these equations, one 𝑙𝑛[𝐴] = 𝑙𝑛[𝐴]0 − 𝑎𝑘𝑡
can form a differential equation, in which through
evaluation, would yield to a linear relationship proposing that plotting the natural logarithm of the
between the concentration of the reactants and concentration of A against time will yield a linear
time. The various forms of the integrated rate plot whose slope is equal to –ak. An example of a
equations depend on the order of the reaction with first order reaction is the decomposition of
respect to the reactant(s) under consideration. hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen gas.
the current experiment, the kinetics of acid- used in the preparation instead of 50 mL to raise
catalyzed hydrolysis of methyl acetate was the concentration of the acid.
investigated, with a focus on the effect of varying
the concentration of the acid catalyst, HCl, on the
c.) Treatment of Results
reaction rate, and measuring the specific rate
constants at two different temperature, in order to Given that the density of methyl acetate is
compute the activation energy, enthalpy of 0.9273 g/mL at 25oC and 0.9141 g/mL at 35oC,
reaction, and the entropy. and its molecular weight is 74.08 g/mol, the initial
concentration of the methyl acetate was computed
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
using
a.) Preparation of Reagents 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑥 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦
( )𝑀𝑒𝐴𝑐
𝑀𝑊
The following reagents were allowed to 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 [𝑀𝑒𝐴𝑐] =
𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
equilibrate in 25°C bath: 50 mL methyl acetate,
300 mL of 1.0 M HCl, and 200 mL of deionized In the titration of methyl acetate using
water. Into a dry 250 mL flask, 50 mL of the HCl sodium chloride, some moles of methyl acetate is
was added with 50 mL water. 10 mL of methyl converted to acetic acid. The reaction involved in
acetate was added to initiate the reaction. A timer the conversion is
was set as half of the required volume of the
MeAC + NaOH → MeOH + H2O
methyl acetate was added, and the mixed solution
was kept in a bath. Using stoichiometry, we can say that the
mole of sodium chloride present in the reaction is
the mole of methyl acetate as well. Hence,
b.) Methodology
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝐻𝐴𝑐 = 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑
The experiment is done in three given 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑 = 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐 𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻 𝑥 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻
conditions: at a room temperature and low
concentration of HCl, at a room temperature and
In order to find the concentration of the
high concentration of HCl, and at a high
acetic acid, we divide the mole of acetic acid to the
temperature and low concentration of HCl. From
total volume of the solution, which is 110 mL.
the prepared mixture, 5 mL aliquot was diluted to
Since not all methyl acetate was converted to
50 mL of water in a 150 mL Erlenmeyer flask. The
acetic acid, an amount methyl acetate was left
flask was then pre-chilled in an ice bath to ensure
after the reaction. To find the concentration of the
than the hydrolysis would be sufficiently slowed.
methyl acetate left, we have
Using standard sodium chloride and
phenolphthalein indicator, the diluted aliquot was 𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑀𝑒𝐴𝑐 − 𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝐻𝐴𝑐
[𝑀𝑒𝐴𝑐] 𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑡 =
titrated. Another aliquots were titrated every after 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
10 minutes, and this was done for an hour. After
The hydrolysis of the methyl acetate to
then, another aliquots were titrated every after 20
water in order to form acetic acid is defined by the
minutes, done for another hour. For the
reaction
temperature and concentration conditions, 25oC
and 35oC were used, while 100 mL of HCl was MeAC + H2O → HAC + MeOH
From this reaction, we can calculate for the 120 6.4 0.60436 0.533599
reaction rate. However, since there is a large Conc. of HCl in reaction mixture 0.4545 M
amount of excess water in the reaction and HCl Temperature Condition 25oC
acts as a catalyst, the reaction rate will only be Determination of Hydrolysis Rate at Room
Temperature and Higher Concentration of
dependent to the concentration of methyl acetate.
HCl
Hence, Reaction Vol of Conc. of Conc. of
Time, min NaOH Acetic Methyl
d MeAc
k ' MeAc used, Acid, M Acetate
dt mL left, M
Acid-Dependent Rate: 0 4.4 0 0.782347
[𝑀𝑒𝐴𝑐] 10 4.7 0.06252 0.719827
−ln 20 5 0.12504 0.657307
[𝑀𝑒𝐴𝑐]𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑡
𝑘𝐻 = 30 5.3 0.18756 0.594787
𝑡
40 5.8 0.29176 0.490587
Using the Arrhenius Equation, the 50 6.1 0.35428 0.428067
reaction rate can be used to find the activation 60 6.2 0.37512 0.407227
energy. This activation energy is actually equal to 80 6.6 0.45848 0.323867
100 6.9 0.521 0.261347
the enthalpy of the reaction, which can be used to
120 6.7 0.47932 0.303027
find the change in the entropy. Conc. of HCl in reaction mixture 0.625 M
Temperature Condition 25oC
k1 H 1 1
ln Determination of Hydrolysis Rate at Higher
k2 R T2 T1 Temperature and Lower Concentration of
HCl
H G Reaction Vol of Conc. of Conc. of
S
T Time, min NaOH Acetic Methyl
used, Acid, M Acetate
RESULTS mL left, M
0 4.0 0 1.146181
Determination of Hydrolysis Rate at Room 10 4.4 0.08336 1.062821
Temperature and Lower Concentration of 20 5.4 0.29176 0.854421
HCl 30 5.7 0.35428 0.791901
Reaction Vol of Conc. of Conc. of 40 5.5 0.3126 0.833581
Time, min NaOH Acetic Methyl 50 5.6 0.33344 0.812741
used, Acid, M Acetate 60 6.1 0.43764 0.708541
mL left, M 80 5.9 0.39596 0.750221
0 3.5 0 1.137959 100 6.3 0.47932 0.666861
10 3.8 0.06252 1.075439 120 6.5 0.521 0.625181
20 4.2 0.14588 0.992079 Conc. of HCl in reaction mixture 0.4545 M
30 4.7 0.25008 0.887879 Temperature Condition 35oC
40 5 0.3126 0.825359
50 5.2 0.35428 0.783679
60 5.5 0.4168 0.721159
80 5.8 0.47932 0.658639
100 6.1 0.54184 0.596119
time. Since the amount of sodium chloride is greater amount of acetic acid is produced with a
theoretically the amount of acetic acid formed from lesser amount of methyl acetate left. This is
the titration of methyl acetate, this means that because the hydrolysis of the methyl acetate
more and more mole of acetic acid is produced in speed up due to the presence of the catalyst and
the hydrolysis of methyl acetate as time goes by. so more amount of methyl acetate was formed
Another interpretation that can be drawn from this with the same amount of time. The acid-
is that since greater production of acetic acid in the dependent rate was also determined wherein it
reaction means that more methyl acetate is being was found out that at a greater concentration, the
converted to acetic acid, the concentration of the acid-dependent rate is also higher.
methyl acetate left decreases with increasing time.
The third part of the experiment was done with a
Taking the natural logarithm of the concentration higher temperature but of the same concentration
of methyl acetate and plotting it in a graph against as to the first part. Theoretically, atoms becomes
time, a linear behavior can be obtained. Looking more excited when heated, spreading out apart
at the trend of the graph, one can simply conclude from each other. This is because of their increased
right away that the reaction of the methyl acetate average kinetic energy which makes them to be
hydrolysis is a first-order reaction. Considering more reactive. On the same manner, it can be
that the coefficient of determination is almost a expected that the rate of reaction will increase as
maximum, this can verify that the data are to the the temperature is increased from 25oC to 35oC,
fitted regression line, indicating that the reaction is with the same linear behavior as the atoms
of a first-order. engage themselves into larger collisions.
Increasing the concentration of the hydrochloric The rate law constant of a system and
acid while maintaining the same room temperature condition can be related to the
temperature condition, the same observation and activation energy using the Arrhenius Equation.
line trends can be seen. However, one can notice The activation energy can be defined as the
that the time of the reaction becomes smaller, minimum energy needed to be present for a
indicating a speed in the reaction rate of the chemical reaction to occur. Once that the free
hydrolysis of methyl acetate compared to the first energy of a molecule overpowers the activation
state. This is due to the fact that hydrochloric acid energy, the reaction would take place.
acts as an acid catalyst in the experiment which Considering that a system has a greater
speeds up the rate of a reaction without causing temperature, the average kinetic energy could
shift in the equilibrium. When a strong acid exceed the activation energy right away, giving a
catalyst is carried in a solution, the concentration faster rate of reaction
of the hydrogen ions does not change during the
The activation energy of the system can also be
reaction. Although the production of acetic acid
defined as the change in the enthalpy of the
from the hydrolysis of methyl acetate causes a
reaction. Since the Gibb’s Free Energy can be
slight increase in the concentration of the
used to relate the enthalpy and entropy to each
hydrogen ions, this increase is almost negligible
other, the change in the entropy of the reaction,
that it gives a very small effect on the reaction rate.
considering that the Gibb’s Free Energy at
Comparing the moles of the acetic acid formed at equilibrium is zero.
a higher concentration that when the
concentration of the hydrochloride acid is lower, a
b. Lojica, Kate Ann M. Same relationship was observed in this part with
the two previous parts. Since the temperature in
This experiment was divided into three parts, this part is higher, the rate of reaction also
which have varying conditions each. This was increases. High temperature makes the molecules
designed to assess the hydrolysis of methyl excited, resulting to its collision to each other. This
acetate through its chemical kinetics. collision results in higher kinetic energy, thus
For the first part, the hydrolysis of methyl acetate higher rate of reaction
was determined at a room temperature and low Same principles in comparing were applied for
concentration of HCl, observations were part C to determine its rate of reaction. It can be
summarized in table A. seen that first order reaction suits the best thus it
The estimated time of reaction increases, the is the order of the reaction is second order.
volume of NaOH, concentration and acetic acid Furthermore, rate constant doubled in every 10°C
increases and methyl acetate left decreases. In rise in temperature. Also, rate constant must be
addition, the volume of NaOH used was also the the same for part A and part C but due to
moles of acetic acid in the aliquot titrated. Through inaccuracies of data gathered its value were
this data observed, the rate of reaction can be different to each other.
known.
Moreover, chemical reaction like this needs
In order to determine the order of reaction, graphs energy to proceed. The minimum energy required
must be compared to each other and determine is called Activation Energy. Activation energy was
what suits the best in the tread line. However, it is computed for this experiment by the equation
very difficult to distinguish one from another. Thus, given below.
the value of R2 which was given in every graph
were compared, this value determines the linearity 𝑘3 𝐸𝑎 1 1
𝑙𝑛 = ( − )
of the graph. Based from simple observation, the 𝑘1 𝑅 𝑇3 𝑇1
order of the reaction is first order. Moreover, for The activation energy is the minimum energy that
the part B of the experiment, hydrolysis took place must be available to make the chemical reaction
at room temperature but higher concentration of happen.
HCl. Data gathered for this part was given in Table
B. Lastly, there are two other parameters in chemical
kinetics, change in enthalpy and entropy. The
Based from the given data, same correlation was change in enthalpy which is the heat of reaction is
observed as part A. However, volume of NaOH most likely same with activation energy. Entropy is
used was doubled in higher concentration of HCl defined as the state of disorder of molecules. Thus,
compared to lower concentration (part A). higher entropy means higher kinetic energy
To determine the rate of reaction for this part, resulting in higher rate of reaction as mentioned
same observations applied. Obviously, the rate of above.
reaction for this part is first. Lastly, hydrolysis in
part C was conducted at higher temperature but
lower concentration of HCl. Data obtained were
shown below, table C.
activation energy of the reaction were quantified order reaction. The first two parts of the
using the modified form of the Arrhenius equation, experiment involved two different concentrations
which is shown below. of HCl. The concentration of the acid that served
as a catalyst should not affect the order of reaction
𝑘1 𝐸𝑎 1 1 therefore the rate constant obtained in part A
ln ( )= ( − )
𝑘2 𝑅 𝑇2 𝑇1 should be the same as that of part B. We were not
able to obtain same values for the rate constants
The activation energy computed is equal to the in part A and B. The reaction rate dependence of
enthalpy of the reaction. To solve for the entropy, temperature can be expressed using the
it may be assumed that the Gibbs’ Free Energy of Arrhenius equation. The third part of the
the reaction is zero, since the reaction is at experiment involved a solution of the same
equilibrium. With the equation for Gibbs’ Free concentration of HCl used in part A but a
Energy, temperature 10 degrees Celsius greater than the
temperature in part A. An increase in temperature
∆𝐺 = ∆𝐻 − 𝑇∆𝑆 increases the rate constant and hence the
since the change in the Gibbs’ Free Energy is 0, reaction rate. Low activation energy and high
temperature means small amount of energy is
the equation would be
necessary for the reaction to occur and this results
∆𝐻 = 𝑇∆𝑆 to large rate constants and therefore speeds up
the reaction.
and substituting the necessary data seen in the
tables would yield an activation energy of 27966.85 Besides the error obtained from the
J/mol and an entropy of -93.80127 J/mol-K. statistical measure of the nearness of the data
gathered to the fitted regression line, the error of
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
the experiment also came from the rate constant
The objective of the experiment was obtained in part B which should be the same in
successfully achieved. By knowing the result, the part A. To perform the experiment successfully
laboratory students were able to plot the and to acquire accurate results care must be
concentration of the methyl acetate left and the observed especially when titrating and pipetting.
time of reaction. The laboratory students were
able to apply the principle of chemical kinetics in REFERENCES
the experiment. Armenise, S., Garcia-Bordeje, E., Valverde, J.,
Romeo, E., & Monzon, A. (2013). A
Based from observation, factors affecting Langmuir–Hinshelwood approach to the
the reaction rate are the concentration of kinetic modelling of catalytic ammonia
reactants, concentration of a catalyst and decomposition in an integral reactor.
temperature. As the population of reactants Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 13.
increase, the likelihood that they will collide
increases. A catalyst can provide a good Atkins, P., & de Paula, J. (2006). Physical
environment for a reaction to occur without Chemistry, Eighth Edition. New York City:
actually being consumed by the reaction. W. H. Freeman and Company.
According to our data, for the three parts Chang, R., & Goldsby, K. (2011). General
of the experiment, the order of the reaction with Chemistry: The Essential Concepts. New
the nearest linearity is the first order of reaction. York City, United States of America:
The hydrolysis of methyl acetate is therefore a first McGraw-Hill.