Blazor For ASP NET Web Forms Developers PDF
Blazor For ASP NET Web Forms Developers PDF
ms/blazor-ebook
PUBLISHED BY
All rights reserved. No part of the contents of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any
form or by any means without the written permission of the publisher.
This book is provided “as-is” and expresses the author’s views and opinions. The views, opinions and
information expressed in this book, including URL and other Internet website references, may change
without notice.
Some examples depicted herein are provided for illustration only and are fictitious. No real association
or connection is intended or should be inferred.
Microsoft and the trademarks listed at https://www.microsoft.com on the “Trademarks” webpage are
trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies.
All other marks and logos are property of their respective owners.
Important
PREVIEW EDITION
This book is a preview edition and is currently under construction. If you have any feedback, submit it
at https://aka.ms/ebookfeedback.
Authors:
Blazor is a new web framework that changes what is possible when building web apps with .NET.
Blazor is a client-side web UI framework based on C# instead of JavaScript. With Blazor you can write
your client-side logic and UI components in C#, compile them into normal .NET assemblies, and then
run them directly in the browser using a new open web standard called WebAssembly. Or
alternatively, Blazor can run your .NET UI components on the server and handle all UI interactions
fluidly over a real-time connection with the browser. When paired with .NET running on the server,
Blazor enables full-stack web development with .NET. While Blazor shares many commonalities with
ASP.NET Web Forms, like having a reusable component model and a simple way to handle user
events, it also builds on the foundations of .NET Core to provide a modern and high performance web
development experience.
This book introduces ASP.NET Web Forms developers to Blazor in a way that is familiar and
convenient. It introduces Blazor concepts in parallel with analogous concepts in ASP.NET Web Forms
while also explaining new concepts that may be less familiar. It covers a broad range of topics and
concerns including component authoring, routing, layout, configuration, and security. And while the
content of this book is primarily for enabling new development, it also covers guidelines and
strategies for migrating existing ASP.NET Web Forms to Blazor for when you want to modernize an
existing app.
Additional resources
You can find the official Blazor home page and documentation at https://blazor.net.
Blazor ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 7
Configuration.......................................................................................................................................................................... 15
Pages.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 16
Layout ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 17
i Contents
Use components ................................................................................................................................................................... 24
OnInitialized ....................................................................................................................................................................... 30
OnParametersSet ............................................................................................................................................................. 30
OnAfterRender .................................................................................................................................................................. 30
IDisposable ......................................................................................................................................................................... 31
Child content...................................................................................................................................................................... 32
Code-behind ........................................................................................................................................................................... 34
Navigation ............................................................................................................................................................................... 38
ii Contents
Server-side versus client-side hosting .......................................................................................................................... 51
iii Contents
CHAPTER 1
An introduction to Blazor
for ASP.NET Web Forms
developers
The ASP.NET Web Forms framework has been a staple of .NET web development since the .NET
Framework first shipped in 2002. Back when the Web was still largely in its infancy, ASP.NET Web
Forms made building web apps simple and productive by adopting many of the patterns that were
used for desktop development. In ASP.NET Web Forms, web pages can be quickly composed from
reusable UI controls. User interactions are handled naturally as events. There’s a rich ecosystem of
Web Forms UI controls provided by Microsoft and control vendors. The controls ease the efforts of
connecting to data sources and displaying rich data visualizations. For the visually inclined, the Web
Forms designer provides a simple drag-and-drop interface for managing controls.
Over the years, Microsoft has introduced new ASP.NET-based web frameworks to address web
development trends. Some such web frameworks include ASP.NET MVC, ASP.NET Web Pages, and
more recently ASP.NET Core. With each new framework, some have predicted the imminent decline of
ASP.NET Web Forms and criticized it as an outdated, outmoded web framework. Despite these
predictions, many .NET web developers continue to find ASP.NET Web Forms a simple, stable, and
productive way to get their work done.
At the time of writing, almost half a million web developers use ASP.NET Web Forms every month. The
ASP.NET Web Forms framework is stable to the point that docs, samples, books, and blog posts from
a decade ago remain useful and relevant. For many .NET web developers, “ASP.NET” is still
synonymous with “ASP.NET Web Forms” as it was when .NET was first conceived. Arguments on the
pros and cons of ASP.NET Web Forms compared to the other new .NET web frameworks may rage on.
ASP.NET Web Forms remains a popular framework for creating web apps.
Even so, innovations in software development aren’t slowing. All software developers need to stay
abreast of new technologies and trends. Two trends in particular are worth considering:
Most modern web frameworks are now also open-source, which has a number of benefits. Users
aren’t beheld to a single project owner to fix bugs and add features. Open-source projects provide
improved transparency on development progress and upcoming changes. Open-source projects enjoy
contributions from an entire community, and they foster a supportive open-source ecosystem.
Despite the risks of open-source, many consumers and contributors have found suitable mitigations
that enable them to enjoy the benefits of an open-source ecosystem in a safe and reasonable way.
Examples of such mitigations include contributor license agreements, friendly licenses, pedigree scans,
and supporting foundations.
The .NET community has embraced both cross-platform support and open-source. .NET Core is an
open-source and cross-platform implementation of .NET that runs on a plethora of platforms,
including Windows, macOS, and various Linux distributions. Xamarin provides Mono, an open-source
version of .NET. Mono runs on Android, iOS, and a variety of other form factors, including watches
and smart TVs. Microsoft has announced that .NET 5 will reconcile .NET Core and Mono into “a single
.NET runtime and framework that can be used everywhere and that has uniform runtime behaviors
and developer experiences.”
Will ASP.NET Web Forms benefit from the move to open-source and cross-platform support? The
answer, unfortunately, is no, or at least not to the same extent as the rest of the platform. The .NET
team recently made it clear that ASP.NET Web Forms won’t be ported to .NET Core or .NET 5. Why is
that?
There were efforts in the early days of .NET Core to port ASP.NET Web Forms. The number of breaking
changes required were found to be too drastic. There’s also an admission here that even for Microsoft,
there’s a limit to the number of web frameworks that it can support simultaneously. Perhaps someone
in the community will take up the cause of creating an open-source and cross-platform version of
ASP.NET Web Forms. The source code for ASP.NET Web Forms has been made available publicly in
reference form. But for the time being, it seems ASP.NET Web Forms will remain Windows-only and
without an open-source contribution model. If cross-platform support or open-source become
important for your scenarios, then you’ll need to look for something new.
But there’s another trend worth considering, and that’s the shift to the client.
However, browsers have become versatile platforms. They implement an ever-increasing number of
open web standards that grant access to the capabilities of the user’s machine. Why not take
advantage of the compute power, storage, memory, and other resources of the client device? UI
interactions in particular can benefit from a richer and more interactive feel when handled at least
partially or completely client-side. Logic and data that should be handled on the server can still be
handled server-side. Web API calls or even over real-time protocols, like WebSockets, can be used.
These benefits are available to web developers for free if they’re willing to write JavaScript. Client-side
UI frameworks, such as Angular, React, and Vue, simplify client-side web development and have
grown in popularity. ASP.NET Web Forms developers can also benefit from leveraging the client, and
even have some out-of-the-box support with integrated JavaScript frameworks like ASP.NET AJAX.
But bridging two different platforms and ecosystems (.NET and JavaScript) comes with a cost.
Expertise is required in two parallel worlds with different languages, frameworks, and tools. Code and
logic can’t be easily shared between client and server, resulting in duplication and engineering
overhead. It can also be difficult to keep up with the JavaScript ecosystem, which has a history of
evolving at breakneck speed. Front-end framework and build tool preferences change quickly. The
industry has observed the progression from Grunt to Gulp to Webpack, and so on. The same restless
churn has occurred with front-end frameworks such as jQuery, Knockout, Angular, React, and Vue. But
given JavaScript’s browser monopoly, there was little choice in the matter. That is, until the web
community got together and caused a miracle to happen!
Work on running .NET on WebAssembly was announced in late 2017 and is expected to ship in 2020,
including support from .NET 5. The ability to run .NET code directly in the browser enables full-stack
web development with .NET.
Blazor has great tooling support in Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code. The framework also includes
a full UI component model and has built-in facilities for:
This book provides an introduction to Blazor that is catered specifically to ASP.NET Web Forms
developers. Each Blazor concept is presented in the context of analogous ASP.NET Web Forms
features and practices. By the end of this book, you’ll have an understanding of:
• HTML markup
• C# or Visual Basic code
• A code-behind class containing logic and event-handling capabilities
• Controls
Controls are reusable units of web UI that can be programmatically placed and interacted with on a
page. Pages are composed of files that end with .aspx containing markup, controls, and some code.
The code-behind classes are in files with the same base name and an .aspx.cs or .aspx.vb extension,
depending on the programming language used. Interestingly, the web server interprets contents of
the .aspx files and compiles them whenever they change. This recompilation occurs even if the web
server is already running.
Controls can be built with markup and delivered as user controls. A user control derives from the
UserControl class and has a similar structure to the Page. Markup for user controls is stored in an
.ascx file. An accompanying code-behind class resides in an .ascx.cs or .ascx.vb file. Controls can also
be built completely with code, by inheriting from either the WebControl or CompositeControl base
class.
Controls on a Page typically post-back to the same page that presented the control, and carry along
with them a payload from a hidden form field called ViewState. The ViewState field contains
information about the state of the controls at the time they were rendered and presented on the
page, allowing the ASP.NET runtime to compare and identify changes in the content submitted to the
server.
Blazor
Blazor is a client-side web UI framework similar in nature to JavaScript front-end frameworks like
Angular or React. Blazor handles user interactions and renders the necessary UI updates. Blazor isn’t
based on a request-reply model. User interactions are handled as events that aren’t in the context of
any particular HTTP request.
Blazor apps consist of one or more root components that are rendered on an HTML page.
How the user specifies where components should render and how the components are then wired up
for user interactions is hosting model specific.
Blazor components are .NET classes that represent a reusable piece of UI. Each component maintains
its own state and specifies its own rendering logic, which can include rendering other components.
Components specify event handlers for specific user interactions to update the component’s state.
After a component handles an event, Blazor renders the component and keeps track of what changed
in the rendered output. Components don’t render directly to the Document Object Model (DOM).
Components can also manually indicate that they should be rendered if their state changes outside of
a normal UI event. Blazor uses a SynchronizationContext to enforce a single logical thread of
execution. A component’s lifecycle methods and any event callbacks that are raised by Blazor are
executed on this SynchronizationContext.
The downloaded assemblies are normal .NET assemblies, like you would use in any other .NET app.
Because the runtime supports .NET Standard, you can use existing .NET Standard libraries with your
Blazor WebAssembly app. However, these assemblies will still execute in the browser security
sandbox. Some functionality may throw a PlatformNotSupportedException, like trying to access the
file system or opening arbitrary network connections.
When the app loads, the .NET runtime is started and pointed at the app assembly. The app startup
logic runs, and the root components are rendered. Blazor calculates the UI updates based on the
rendered output from the components. The DOM updates are then applied.
To get all the benefits of Blazor and full-stack .NET web development, host your Blazor WebAssembly
app with ASP.NET Core. By using .NET on both the client and server, you can easily share code and
build your app using one consistent set of languages, frameworks, and tools. Blazor provides
convenient templates for setting up a solution that contains both a Blazor WebAssembly app and an
ASP.NET Core host project. When the solution is built, the built static files from the Blazor app are
hosted by the ASP.NET Core app with fallback routing already setup.
In Blazor Server apps, the components run on the server instead of client-side in the browser. UI
events that occur in the browser are sent to the server over a real-time connection. The events are
dispatched to the correct component instances. The components render, and the calculated UI diff is
serialized and sent to the browser where it’s applied to the DOM.
• There’s no .NET server-side dependency. The app is fully functioning after downloaded to the
client.
• Client resources and capabilities are fully leveraged.
• Work is offloaded from the server to the client.
• An ASP.NET Core web server isn’t required to host the app. Serverless deployment scenarios are
possible (for example, serving the app from a CDN).
The downsides of the Blazor WebAssembly hosting model are:
• Download size is much smaller than a client-side app, and the app loads much faster.
• The app takes full advantage of server capabilities, including use of any .NET Core-compatible
APIs.
• .NET Core on the server is used to run the app, so existing .NET tooling, such as debugging,
works as expected.
• Thin clients are supported. For example, server-side apps work with browsers that don’t support
WebAssembly and on resource-constrained devices.
• The app’s .NET/C# code base, including the app’s component code, isn’t served to clients.
The downsides to the Blazor Server hosting model are:
To create your first Blazor app, follow the instructions in the Blazor getting started steps. You can
follow the instructions to create either a Blazor Server app or a Blazor WebAssembly app hosted in
ASP.NET Core. Except for the hosting model-specific logic, most of the code in both projects is the
same.
Project file
Blazor Server apps are .NET Core projects. The project file for the Blazor Server app is about as simple
as it can get:
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Web">
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>netcoreapp3.0</TargetFramework>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>
The project file for a Blazor WebAssembly app looks slightly more involved (exact version numbers
may vary):
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Web">
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>netstandard2.0</TargetFramework>
<RazorLangVersion>3.0</RazorLangVersion>
</PropertyGroup>
<ItemGroup>
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.Blazor" Version="3.1.0" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.Blazor.Build" Version="3.1.0"
PrivateAssets="all" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.Blazor.HttpClient" Version="3.1.0" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.Blazor.DevServer" Version="3.1.0"
PrivateAssets="all" />
<ItemGroup>
<ProjectReference Include="..\Shared\BlazorWebAssemblyApp1.Shared.csproj" />
</ItemGroup>
</Project>
Blazor WebAssembly projects target .NET Standard instead of .NET Core because they run in the
browser on a WebAssembly-based .NET runtime. You can’t install .NET into a web browser like you
can on a server or developer machine. Consequently, the project references the Blazor framework
using individual package references.
By comparison, a default ASP.NET Web Forms project includes almost 300 lines of XML in its .csproj
file, most of which is explicitly listing the various code and content files in the project. Many of the
simplifications in the .NET Core- and .NET Standard-based projects come from the default targets and
properties imported by referencing the Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Web SDK, often referred to as simply the
Web SDK. The Web SDK includes wildcards and other conveniences that simplify inclusion of code
and content files in the project. You don’t need to list the files explicitly. When targeting .NET Core,
the Web SDK also adds framework references to both the .NET Core and ASP.NET Core shared
frameworks. The frameworks are visible from the Dependencies > Frameworks node in the Solution
Explorer window. The shared frameworks are collections of assemblies that were installed on the
machine when installing .NET Core.
Although they’re supported, individual assembly references are less common in .NET Core projects.
Most project dependencies are handled as NuGet package references. You only need to reference
top-level package dependencies in .NET Core projects. Transitive dependencies are included
automatically. Instead of using the packages.config file commonly found in ASP.NET Web Forms
projects to reference packages, package references are added to the project file using the
<PackageReference> element.
<ItemGroup>
<PackageReference Include="Newtonsoft.Json" Version="12.0.2" />
</ItemGroup>
Entry point
The Blazor Server app’s entry point is defined in the Program.cs file, as you would see in a Console
app. When the app executes, it creates and runs a web host instance using defaults specific to web
apps. The web host manages the Blazor Server app’s lifecycle and sets up host-level services.
Examples of such services are configuration, logging, dependency injection, and the HTTP server. This
code is mostly boilerplate and is often left unchanged.
Blazor WebAssembly apps also define an entry point in Program.cs. The code looks slightly different.
The code is similar in that it’s setting up the app host to provide the same host-level services to the
app. The WebAssembly app host doesn’t, however, set up an HTTP server because it executes directly
in the browser.
Blazor apps have a Startup class instead of a Global.asax file to define the startup logic for the app.
The Startup class is used to configure the app and any app-specific services. In the Blazor Server app,
the Startup class is used to set up the endpoint for the real-time connection used by Blazor between
the client browsers and the server. In the Blazor WebAssembly app, the Startup class defines the root
components for the app and where they should be rendered. We’ll take a deeper look at the Startup
class in the App startup section.
Static files
Unlike ASP.NET Web Forms projects, not all files in a Blazor project can be requested as static files.
Only the files in the wwwroot folder are web-addressable. This folder is referred to the app’s “web
root”. Anything outside of the app’s web root isn’t web-addressable. This setup provides an additional
level of security that prevents accidental exposing of project files over the web.
Configuration
Configuration in ASP.NET Web Forms apps is typically handled using one or more web.config files.
Blazor apps don’t typically have web.config files. If they do, the file is only used to configure IIS-
specific settings when hosted on IIS. Instead, Blazor Server apps use the ASP.NET Core configuration
abstractions (Blazor WebAssembly apps don’t currently support the same configuration abstractions,
but that may be a feature added in the future). For example, the default Blazor Server app stores some
settings in appsettings.json.
We’ll learn more about configuration in ASP.NET Core projects in the Configuration section.
Razor components
Most files in Blazor projects are .razor files. Razor is a templating language based on HTML and C#
that is used to dynamically generate web UI. The .razor files define components that make up the UI
of the app. For the most part, the components are identical for both the Blazor Server and Blazor
WebAssembly apps. Components in Blazor are analogous to user controls in ASP.NET Web Forms.
Each Razor component file is compiled into a .NET class when the project is built. The generated class
captures the component’s state, rendering logic, lifecycle methods, event handlers, and other logic.
We’ll look at authoring components in the Building reusable UI components with Blazor section.
The *_Imports.razor* files aren’t Razor component files. Instead, they define a set of Razor directives to
import into other .razor files within the same folder and in its subfolders. For example, a
*_Imports.razor* file is a conventional way to add using statements for commonly used namespaces:
@using System.Net.Http
@using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization
@using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components.Authorization
@using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components.Forms
@using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components.Routing
@using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components.Web
@using Microsoft.JSInterop
@using BlazorApp1
@using BlazorApp1.Shared
Pages
Where are the pages in the Blazor apps? Blazor doesn’t define a separate file extension for
addressable pages, like the .aspx files in ASP.NET Web Forms apps. Instead, pages are defined by
assigning routes to components. A route is typically assigned using the @page Razor directive. For
example, the Counter component authored in the Pages/Counter.razor file defines the following
route:
@page "/counter"
Routing in Blazor is handled client-side, not on the server. As the user navigates in the browser, Blazor
intercepts the navigation and then renders the component with the matching route.
We’ll look in greater detail at routing in Blazor in the Pages, routing, and layouts section.
Layout
In ASP.NET Web Forms apps, common page layout is handled using master pages (Site.Master). In
Blazor apps, page layout is handled using layout components (Shared/MainLayout.razor). Layout
components will be discussed in more detail in Page, routing, and layouts section.
Bootstrap Blazor
To bootstrap Blazor, the app must:
• Specify where on the page the root component (App.Razor) should be rendered.
• Add the corresponding Blazor framework script.
In the Blazor Server app, the root component’s host page is defined in the *_Host.cshtml* file. This file
defines a Razor Page, not a component. Razor Pages use Razor syntax to define a server-addressable
page, very much like an .aspx page. The Html.RenderComponentAsync<TComponent>(RenderMode)
method is used to define where a root-level component should be rendered. The RenderMode option
indicates the manner in which the component should be rendered. The following table outlines the
supported RenderMode options.
Option Description
RenderMode.Server Rendered interactively once a connection with the browser is
established
RenderMode.ServerPrerendered First prerendered and then rendered interactively
RenderMode.Static Rendered as static content
The script reference to *_framework/blazor.server.js* establishes the real-time connection with the
server and then deals with all user interactions and UI updates.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
<title>BlazorApp1</title>
<base href="~/" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/bootstrap/bootstrap.min.css" />
<link href="css/site.css" rel="stylesheet" />
</head>
<body>
<app>
@(await Html.RenderComponentAsync<App>(RenderMode.ServerPrerendered))
</app>
<script src="_framework/blazor.server.js"></script>
</body>
</html>
In the Blazor WebAssembly app, the host page is a simple static HTML file under wwwroot/index.html.
The <app> element is used to indicate where the root component should be rendered.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
<title>BlazorApp2</title>
<base href="/" />
<link href="css/bootstrap/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet" />
<link href="css/site.css" rel="stylesheet" />
</head>
<body>
<app>Loading...</app>
<script src="_framework/blazor.webassembly.js"></script>
</body>
</html>
The specific component to render is configured in the app’s Startup.Configure method with a
corresponding CSS selector indicating where the component should be rendered.
To run the Blazor WebAssembly app, choose one of the following approaches:
An introduction to Razor
Razor is a light-weight markup templating language based on HTML and C#. With Razor, you can
seamlessly transition between markup and C# code to define your component rendering logic. When
the .razor file is compiled, the rendering logic is captured in a structured way in a .NET class. The name
of the compiled class is taken from the .razor file name. The namespace is taken from the default
namespace for the project and the folder path, or you can explicitly specify the namespace using the
@namespace directive (more on Razor directives below).
A component’s rendering logic is authored using normal HTML markup with dynamic logic added
using C#. The @ character is used to transition to C#. Razor is typically smart about figuring out when
you’ve switched back to HTML. For example, the following component renders a <p> tag with the
current time:
<p>@DateTime.Now</p>
<p>@(DateTime.Now)</p>
Razor also makes it easy to use C# control flow in your rendering logic. For example, you can
conditionally render some HTML like this:
Or you can generate a list of items using a normal C# foreach loop like this:
<ul>
@foreach (var item in items)
{
<li>item.Text</li>
}
</ul>
Razor directives, like directives in ASP.NET Web Forms, control many aspects of how a Razor
component is compiled. Examples include the component’s:
• Namespace
• Base class
• Implemented interfaces
• Generic parameters
• Imported namespaces
• Routes
Razor directives start with the @ character and are typically used at the start of a new line at the start
of the file. For example, the @namespace directive defines the component’s namespace:
@namespace MyComponentNamespace
The following table summarizes the various Razor directives used in Blazor and their ASP.NET Web
Forms equivalents, if they exist.
Razor components also make extensive use of directive attributes on elements to control various
aspects of how components get compiled (event handling, data binding, component & element
references, and so on). Directive attributes all follow a common generic syntax where the values in
parenthesis are optional:
@directive(-suffix(:name))(="value")
The following table summarizes the various attributes for Razor directives used in Blazor.
The various directive attributes used by Blazor (@onclick, @bind, @ref, and so on) are covered in the
sections below and later chapters.
Many of the syntaxes used in .aspx and .ascx files have parallel syntaxes in Razor. Below is a simple
comparison of the syntaxes for ASP.NET Web Forms and Razor.
To add members to the Razor component class, use the @code directive. This technique is similar to
using a <script runat="server">...</script> block in an ASP.NET Web Forms user control or
page.
@code {
int count = 0;
void IncrementCount()
{
count++;
}
}
Because Razor is based on C#, it must be compiled from within a C# project (.csproj). You can’t
compile .razor files from a VB project (.vbproj). You can still reference VB projects from your Blazor
project. The opposite is true too.
For a full Razor syntax reference, see Razor syntax reference for ASP.NET Core.
Use components
Aside from normal HTML, components can also use other components as part of their rendering logic.
The syntax for using a component in Razor is similar to using a user control in an ASP.NET Web Forms
app. Components are specified using an element tag that matches the type name of the component.
For example, you can add a Counter component like this:
<Counter />
<Counter />
As seen in the default Blazor projects, it’s common to put @using directives into a *_Imports.razor* file
so that they’re imported into all .razor files in the same directory and in child directories.
If the namespace for a component isn’t in scope, you can specify a component using its full type
name, as you can in C#:
<MyComponentLib.Counter />
Component parameters
In ASP.NET Web Forms, you can flow parameters and data to controls using public properties. These
properties can be set in markup using attributes or set directly in code. Blazor components work in a
similar fashion, although the component properties must also be marked with the [Parameter]
attribute to be considered component parameters.
The following Counter component defines a component parameter called IncrementAmount that can
be used to specify the amount that the Counter should be incremented each time the button is
clicked.
<h1>Counter</h1>
@code {
int currentCount = 0;
[Parameter]
public int IncrementAmount { get; set; } = 1;
void IncrementCount()
{
currentCount+=IncrementAmount;
}
}
To specify a component parameter in Blazor, use an attribute as you would in ASP.NET Web Forms:
Event handlers
Both ASP.NET Web Forms and Blazor provide an event-based programming model for handling UI
events. Examples of such events include button clicks and text input. In ASP.NET Web Forms, you use
HTML server controls to handle UI events exposed by the DOM, or you can handle events exposed by
web server controls. The events are surfaced on the server through form post-back requests. Consider
the following Web Forms button click example:
Counter.ascx.cs
In Blazor, you can register handlers for DOM UI events directly using directive attributes of the form
@on{event}. The {event} placeholder represents the name of the event. For example, you can listen
for button clicks like this:
@code {
void OnClick()
{
Console.WriteLine("The button was clicked!);
}
}
Event handlers can accept an optional, event-specific argument to provide more information about
the event. For example, mouse events can take a MouseEventArgs argument, but it isn’t required.
@code {
void OnClick(MouseEventArgs e)
{
Console.WriteLine($"Mouse clicked at {e.ScreenX}, {e.ScreenY}.");
}
}
Instead of referring to a method group for an event handler, you can use a lambda expression. A
lambda expression allows you to close over other in-scope values.
@code {
async Task OnClick()
{
var result = await Http.GetAsync("api/values");
}
}
After an event is handled, the component is rendered to account for any component state changes.
With asynchronous event handlers, the component is rendered immediately after the handler
execution completes. The component is rendered again after the asynchronous Task completes. This
asynchronous execution mode provides an opportunity to render some appropriate UI while the
asynchronous Task is still in progress.
@if (showMessage)
{
@if (message == null)
{
<p><em>Loading...</em></p>
}
else
{
<p>The message is: @message</p>
}
}
@code
{
bool showMessage = false;
string message;
Components can also define their own events by defining a component parameter of type
EventCallback<TValue>. Event callbacks support all the variations of DOM UI event handlers:
optional arguments, synchronous or asynchronous, method groups, or lambda expressions.
@code {
[Parameter]
public EventCallback<MouseEventArgs> OnClick { get; set; }
}
To create a two-way data binding from a UI component to the component’s state, use the @bind
directive attribute. In the following example, the value of the check box is bound to the isChecked
field.
@code {
bool isChecked;
}
When the component is rendered, the value of the checkbox is set to the value of the isChecked field.
When the user toggles the checkbox, the onchange event is fired and the isChecked field is set to the
new value. The @bind syntax in this case is equivalent to the following markup:
To change the event used for the bind, use the @bind:event attribute.
@code {
string text;
}
Components can also support data binding to their parameters. To data bind, define an event callback
parameter with the same name as the bindable parameter. The “Changed” suffix is added to the
name.
PasswordBox.razor
Password: <input
value="@Password"
@oninput="OnPasswordChanged"
type="@(showPassword ? "text" : "password")" />
@code {
private bool showPassword;
[Parameter]
public string Password { get; set; }
[Parameter]
public EventCallback<string> PasswordChanged { get; set; }
To chain a data binding to an underlying UI element, set the value and handle the event directly on
the UI element instead of using the @bind attribute.
@code {
string password;
}
State changes
If the component’s state has changed outside of a normal UI event or event callback, then the
component must manually signal that it needs to be rendered again. To signal that a component’s
state has changed, call the StateHasChanged method on the component.
In the example below, a component displays a message from an AppState service that can be
updated by other parts of the app. The component registers its StateHasChanged method with the
AppState.OnChange event so that the component is rendered whenever the message gets updated.
@code {
protected override void OnInitialized()
{
AppState.OnChange += StateHasChanged
}
}
Counter.ascx.cs
Blazor components also have a well-defined lifecycle. A component’s lifecycle can be used to initialize
component state and implement advanced component behaviors.
All of Blazor’s component lifecycle methods have both synchronous and asynchronous versions.
Component rendering is synchronous. You can’t run asynchronous logic as part of the component
rendering. All asynchronous logic must execute as part of an async lifecycle method.
OnInitialized
The OnInitialized and OnInitializedAsync methods are used to initialize the component. A
component is typically initialized after it’s first rendered. After a component is initialized, it may be
rendered multiple times before it’s eventually disposed. The OnInitialized method is similar to the
Page_Load event in ASP.NET Web Forms pages and controls.
OnParametersSet
The OnParametersSet and OnParametersSetAsync methods are called when a component has
received parameters from its parent and the value are assigned to properties. These methods are
executed after component initialization and each time the component is rendered.
OnAfterRender
The OnAfterRender and OnAfterRenderAsync methods are called after a component has finished
rendering. Element and component references are populated at this point (more on these concepts
below). Interactivity with the browser is enabled at this point. Interactions with the DOM and
JavaScript execution can safely take place.
The firstRender parameter is true the first time the component is rendered; otherwise, its value is
false.
IDisposable
Blazor components can implement IDisposable to dispose of resources when the component is
removed from the UI. A Razor component can implement IDispose by using the @implements
directive:
@using System
@implements IDisposable
...
@code {
public void Dispose()
{
...
}
}
To capture a component reference in Blazor, use the @ref directive attribute. The value of the
attribute should match the name of a settable field with the same type as the referenced component.
@code {
MyLoginDialog loginDialog;
void OnSomething()
{
loginDialog.Show();
}
}
When the parent component is rendered, the field is populated with the child component instance.
You can then call methods on, or otherwise manipulate, the component instance.
Manipulating component state directly using component references isn’t recommended. Doing so
prevents the component from being rendered automatically at the correct times.
Templated components
In ASP.NET Web Forms, you can create templated controls. Templated controls enable the developer
to specify a portion of the HTML used to render a container control. The mechanics of building
templated server controls are complex, but they enable powerful scenarios for rendering data in a
user customizable way. Examples of templated controls include Repeater and DataList.
Child content
Blazor components can capture their child content as a RenderFragment and render that content as
part of the component rendering. To capture child content, define a component parameter of type
RenderFragment and name it ChildContent.
<div>@ChildContent</div>
@code {
[Parameter]
public RenderFragment ChildContent { get; set; }
}
A parent component can then supply child content using normal Razor syntax.
<ChildContentComponent>
<p>The time is @DateTime.Now</p>
</ChildContentComponent>
Template parameters
A templated Blazor component can also define multiple component parameters of type
RenderFragment or RenderFragment<T>. The parameter for a RenderFragment<T> can be specified
when it’s invoked. To specify a generic type parameter for a component, use the @typeparam Razor
directive.
SimpleListView.razor
@typeparam TItem
@Heading
<ul>
@foreach (var item in items)
{
<li>@ItemTemplate(item)</li>
}
</ul>
@code {
[Parameter]
public RenderFragment Heading { get; set; }
[Parameter]
public RenderFragment<TItem> ItemTemplate { get; set; }
[Parameter]
public IEnumerable<TItem> Items { get; set; }
}
When using a templated component, the template parameters can be specified using child elements
that match the names of the parameters. Component arguments of type RenderFragment<T> passed
as elements have an implicit parameter named context. You can change the name of this implement
parameter using the Context attribute on the child element. Any generic type parameters can be
specified using an attribute that matches the name of the type parameter. The type parameter will be
inferred if possible:
<h1>My list</h1>
<ul>
<li>The message is: message1</li>
<li>The message is: message2</li>
<ul>
Code-behind
A Blazor component is typically authored in a single .razor file. However, it’s also possible to separate
the code and markup using a code-behind file. To use a component file, add a C# file that matches
the file name of the component file but with a .cs extension added (Counter.razor.cs). Use the C# file
to define a base class for the component. You can name the base class anything you’d like, but it’s
common to name the class the same as the component class, but with a Base extension added
(CounterBase). The component-based class must also derive from ComponentBase. Then, in the Razor
component file, add the @inherits directive to specify the base class for the component (@inherits
CounterBase).
Counter.razor
@inherits CounterBase
<h1>Counter</h1>
Counter.razor.cs
The visibility of the component’s members in the base class must be protected or public to be
visible to the component class.
In Blazor, each page in the app is a component, typically defined in a .razor file, with one or more
specified routes. Routing mostly happens client-side without involving a specific server request. The
browser first makes a request to the root address of the app. A root Router component in the Blazor
app then handles intercepting navigation requests and them to the correct component.
Blazor also supports deep linking. Deep linking occurs when the browser makes a request to a specific
route other than the root of the app. Requests for deep links sent to the server are routed to the
Blazor app, which then routes the request client-side to the correct component.
A simple page in ASP.NET Web Forms might contain the following markup:
Name.aspx
Name.aspx.cs
Name.razor
@page "/Name"
@layout MainLayout
<div>
What is your name?<br />
<input @bind="text" />
<button @onclick="OnClick">Submit</button>
</div>
<div>
if (name != null)
{
Hello @name
}
</div>
@code {
string text;
string name;
void OnClick() {
name = text;
}
}
Create pages
To create a page in Blazor, create a component and add the @page Razor directive to specify the route
for the component. The @page directive takes a single parameter, which is the route template to add
to that component.
@page "/counter"
The route template parameter is required. Unlike ASP.NET Web Forms, the route to a Blazor
component isn’t inferred from its file location (although that may be a feature added in the future).
The route template syntax is the same basic syntax used for routing in ASP.NET Web Forms. Route
parameters are specified in the template using braces. Blazor will bind route values to component
parameters with the same name (case-insensitive).
@page "/product/{id}"
<h1>Product @Id</h1>
@code {
[Parameter]
public string Id { get; set; }
}
@page "/product/{id:int}"
<h1>Product @Id</h1>
@code {
[Parameter]
public int Id { get; set; }
}
For a full list of the route constraints supported by Blazor, see Route constraints.
Router component
Routing in Blazor is handled by the Router component. The Router component is typically used in the
app’s root component (App.razor).
<Router AppAssembly="@typeof(Program).Assembly">
<Found Context="routeData">
<RouteView RouteData="@routeData" DefaultLayout="@typeof(MainLayout)" />
</Found>
<NotFound>
<LayoutView Layout="@typeof(MainLayout)">
<p>Sorry, there's nothing at this address.</p>
</LayoutView>
</NotFound>
</Router>
The Router component discovers the routable components in the specified AppAssembly and in the
optionally specified AdditionalAssemblies. When the browser navigates, the Router intercepts the
navigation and renders the contents of its Found parameter with the extracted RouteData if a route
matches the address, otherwise the Router renders its NotFound parameter.
The RouteView component handles rendering the matched component specified by the RouteData
with its layout if it has one. If the matched component doesn’t have a layout, then the optionally
specified DefaultLayout is used.
The LayoutView component renders its child content within the specified layout. We’ll look at layouts
more in detail later in this chapter.
Navigation
In ASP.NET Web Forms, you trigger navigation to a different page by returning a redirect response to
the browser. For example:
@page "/"
@inject NavigationManager NavigationManager
<button @onclick="Navigate">Navigate</button>
@code {
void Navigate() {
NavigationManager.NavigateTo("counter");
}
}
For a description of all NavigationManager members, see URI and navigation state helpers.
Base URLs
If your Blazor app is deployed under a base path, then you need to specify the base URL in the page
metadata using the <base> tag for routing to work property. If the host page for the app is server-
rendered using Razor, then you can use the ~/ syntax to specify the app’s base address. If the host
page is static HTML, then you need to specify the base URL explicitly.
Page layout
Page layout in ASP.NET Web Forms is handled by Master Pages. Master Pages define a template with
one or more content placeholders that can then be supplied by individual pages. Master Pages are
defined in .master files and start with the <%@ Master %> directive. The content of the .master files is
coded as you would an .aspx page, but with the addition of <asp:ContentPlaceHolder> controls to
mark where pages can supply content.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head runat="server">
<meta charset="utf-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
<title><%: Page.Title %> - My ASP.NET Application</title>
<link href="~/favicon.ico" rel="shortcut icon" type="image/x-icon" />
</head>
<body>
<form runat="server">
<div class="container body-content">
<asp:ContentPlaceHolder ID="MainContent" runat="server">
</asp:ContentPlaceHolder>
<hr />
<footer>
<p>© <%: DateTime.Now.Year %> - My ASP.NET Application</p>
</footer>
</div>
</form>
</body>
</html>
In Blazor, you handle page layout using layout components. Layout components inherit from
LayoutComponentBase, which defines a single Body property of type RenderFragment, which can be
used to render the contents of the page.
MainLayout.razor
@inherits LayoutComponentBase
<h1>Main layout</h1>
<div>
@Body
</div>
When the page with a layout is rendered, the page is rendered within the contents of the specified
layout at the location where the layout renders its Body property.
@layout MainLayout
You can specify the layout for all components in a folder and subfolders using an *_Imports.razor* file.
You can also specify a default layout for all your pages using the Router component.
Master Pages can define multiple content placeholders, but layouts in Blazor only have a single Body
property. This limitation of Blazor layout components will hopefully be addressed in a future release.
Master Pages in ASP.NET Web Forms can be nested. That is, a Master Page may also use a Master
Page. Layout components in Blazor may be nested too. You can apply a layout component to a layout
component. The contents of the inner layout will be rendered within the outer layout.
@layout MainLayout
<h2>Child layout</h2>
<div>
@Body
</div>
Index.razor
@page "/"
@layout ChildLayout
<p>I'm in a nested layout!</p>
<h1>Main layout</h1>
<div>
<h2>Child layout</h2>
<div>
<p>I'm in a nested layout!</p>
</div>
</div>
Layouts in Blazor don’t typically define the root HTML elements for a page ( <html>, <body>, <head>,
and so on). The root HTML elements are instead defined in a Blazor app’s host page, which is used to
render the initial HTML content for the app (see Bootstrap Blazor). The host page can render multiple
root components for the app with surrounding markup.
Components in Blazor, including pages, can’t render <script> tags. This rendering restriction exists
because <script> tags get loaded once and then can’t be changed. Unexpected behavior may occur
if you try to render the tags dynamically using Razor syntax. Instead, all <script> tags should be
added to the app’s host page.
Blazor supports the sharing of validation logic between both the client and the server. ASP.NET
provides pre-built JavaScript implementations of many common server validations. In many cases, the
developer still has to write JavaScript to fully implement their app-specific validation logic. The same
model types, data annotations, and validation logic can be used on both the server and client.
Blazor provides a set of input components. The input components handle binding field data to a
model and validating the user input when the form is submitted.
The EditForm component wraps these input components and orchestrates the validation process
through an EditContext. When creating an EditForm, you specify what model instance to bind to
using the Model parameter. Validation is typically done using data annotations, and it’s extensible. To
enable data annotation-based validation, add the DataAnnotationsValidator component as a child
of the EditForm. The EditForm component provides a convenient event for handling valid
(OnValidSubmit) and invalid (OnInvalidSubmit) submissions. There’s also a more generic OnSubmit
event that lets you trigger and handle the validation yourself.
To display a validation error summary, use the ValidationSummary component. To display validation
messages for a specific input field, use the ValidationMessage component, specifying a lambda
expression for the For parameter that points to the appropriate model member.
The following model type defines several validation rules using data annotations:
[Required]
public string Classification { get; set; }
[Range(1, 100000,
ErrorMessage = "Accommodation invalid (1-100000).")]
public int MaximumAccommodation { get; set; }
[Required]
[Range(typeof(bool), "true", "true",
ErrorMessage = "This form disallows unapproved ships.")]
public bool IsValidatedDesign { get; set; }
[Required]
public DateTime ProductionDate { get; set; }
}
The following component demonstrates building a form in Blazor based on the Starship model type:
<p>
<label for="identifier">Identifier: </label>
<InputText id="identifier" @bind-Value="starship.Identifier" />
<ValidationMessage For="() => "starship.Identifier" />
</p>
<p>
<label for="description">Description (optional): </label>
<InputTextArea id="description" @bind-Value="starship.Description" />
</p>
<p>
<label for="classification">Primary Classification: </label>
<InputSelect id="classification" @bind-Value="starship.Classification">
<option value="">Select classification ...</option>
<option value="Exploration">Exploration</option>
<option value="Diplomacy">Diplomacy</option>
<option value="Defense">Defense</option>
</InputSelect>
<ValidationMessage For="() => "starship.Classification" />
</p>
<p>
<label for="accommodation">Maximum Accommodation: </label>
<InputNumber id="accommodation" @bind-Value="starship.MaximumAccommodation" />
<ValidationMessage For="() => "starship.MaximumAccommodation" />
</p>
<button type="submit">Submit</button>
</EditForm>
@code {
private Starship starship = new Starship();
After the form submission, the model-bound data hasn’t been saved to any data store, like a
database. In a Blazor WebAssembly app, the data must be sent to the server. For example, using an
HTTP POST request. In a Blazor Server app, the data is already on the server, but it must be persisted.
Handling data access in Blazor apps is the subject of the Dealing with data section.
Additional resources
For more information on forms and validation in Blazor apps, see the Blazor documentation.
49 CHAPTER 13 | Security: authentication and authorization in ASP.NET Web Forms and Blazor
CHAPTER 14
Migrate from ASP.NET
Web Forms to Blazor
Migrating a code base from ASP.NET Web Forms to Blazor is a time-consuming task that requires
planning. This chapter outlines the process. Something that can ease the transition is to ensure the
app adheres to an N-tier architecture, wherein the app model (in this case, Web Forms) is separate
from the business logic. This logical separation of layers makes it clear what needs to move to .NET
Core and Blazor.
For this example, the eShop app available on GitHub is used. eShop is a catalog service that provides
CRUD capabilities via form entry and validation.
Why should a working app be migrated to Blazor? Many times, there’s no need. ASP.NET Web Forms
will continue to be supported for many years. However, many of the features that Blazor provides are
only supported on a migrated app. Such features include:
• Running as WebAssembly is still in development and may not support all features (such as
threading) at the current time
• Chatty communication between the client and server may cause latency issues in server-side
mode
• Access to databases and internal or protected services require a separate service with client-side
hosting
At the time of writing, the server-side model more closely resembles Web Forms. Most of this chapter
focuses on the server-side hosting model, as it’s production-ready.
Once the project has been created, install the libraries that were used in the previous project. In older
Web Forms projects, you may have used the packages.config file to list the required NuGet packages.
In the new SDK-style project, packages.config has been replaced with <PackageReference> elements
in the project file. A benefit to this approach is that all dependencies are installed transitively. You only
list the top-level dependencies you care about.
Many of the dependencies you’re using are available for .NET Core, including Entity Framework 6 and
log4net. If there’s no .NET Core or .NET Standard version available, the .NET Framework version can
often be used. Your mileage may vary. Any API used that isn’t available in .NET Core causes a runtime
error. Visual Studio notifies you of such packages. A yellow icon appears on the project’s References
node in Solution Explorer.
The <packages> element includes all necessary dependencies. It’s difficult to identify which of these
packages are included because you require them. Some <package> elements are listed simply to
satisfy the needs of dependencies you require.
The Blazor project lists the dependencies you require within an <ItemGroup> element in the project
file:
<ItemGroup>
<PackageReference Include="Autofac" Version="4.9.3" />
<PackageReference Include="EntityFramework" Version="6.3.0-preview9-19423-04" />
<PackageReference Include="log4net" Version="2.0.8" />
</ItemGroup>
One NuGet package that simplifies the life of Web Forms developers is the Windows Compatibility
Pack. Although .NET Core is cross-platform, some features are only available on Windows. Windows-
specific features are made available by installing the compatibility pack. Examples of such features
include the Registry, WMI, and Directory Services. The package adds around 20,000 APIs and activates
many services with which you may already be familiar. The eShop project doesn’t require the
compatibility pack; but if your projects use Windows-specific features, the package eases the
migration efforts.
52 CHAPTER 14 | Migrate from ASP.NET Web Forms to Blazor
Enable startup process
The startup process for Blazor has changed from Web Forms and follows a similar setup for other
ASP.NET Core services. When hosted server-side, Blazor components are run as part of a normal
ASP.NET Core app. When hosted in the browser with WebAssembly, Blazor components use a similar
hosting model. The difference is the components are run as a separate service from any of the
backend processes. Either way, the startup is similar.
The Global.asax.cs file is the default startup page for Web Forms projects. In the eShop project, this file
configures the Inversion of Control (IoC) container and handles the various lifecycle events of the app
or request. Some of these events are handled with middleware (such as Application_BeginRequest).
Other events require the overriding of specific services via dependency injection (DI).
By way of example, the Global.asax.cs file for eShop, contains the following code:
/// <summary>
/// Track the machine name and the start time for the session inside the current
session
/// </summary>
protected void Session_Start(Object sender, EventArgs e)
{
HttpContext.Current.Session["MachineName"] = Environment.MachineName;
HttpContext.Current.Session["SessionStartTime"] = DateTime.Now;
}
/// <summary>
/// http://docs.autofac.org/en/latest/integration/webforms.html
/// </summary>
private void ConfigureContainer()
{
var builder = new ContainerBuilder();
var mockData = bool.Parse(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["UseMockData"]);
builder.RegisterModule(new ApplicationModule(mockData));
container = builder.Build();
_containerProvider = new ContainerProvider(container);
if (!mockData)
{
Database.SetInitializer<CatalogDBContext>(container.Resolve<CatalogDBInitializer>());
}
}
_log.Debug("Application_BeginRequest");
}
}
// This method gets called by the runtime. Use this method to add services to the
container.
// For more information on how to configure your application, visit
https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=398940
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddRazorPages();
services.AddServerSideBlazor();
if (Configuration.GetValue<bool>("UseMockData"))
{
services.AddSingleton<ICatalogService, CatalogServiceMock>();
}
else
{
services.AddScoped<ICatalogService, CatalogService>();
services.AddScoped<IDatabaseInitializer<CatalogDBContext>,
CatalogDBInitializer>();
services.AddSingleton<CatalogItemHiLoGenerator>();
services.AddScoped(_ => new
CatalogDBContext(Configuration.GetConnectionString("CatalogDBContext")));
}
// This method gets called by the runtime. Use this method to configure the HTTP
request pipeline.
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, ILoggerFactory loggerFactory)
{
loggerFactory.AddLog4Net("log4Net.xml");
if (Env.IsDevelopment())
{
app.UseDeveloperExceptionPage();
}
else
{
app.UseExceptionHandler("/Home/Error");
}
app.UseStaticFiles();
app.UseRouting();
app.UseEndpoints(endpoints =>
{
endpoints.MapBlazorHub();
endpoints.MapFallbackToPage("/_Host");
});
ConfigDataBase(app);
}
if (initializer != null)
{
Database.SetInitializer(initializer);
}
}
}
}
One significant change you may notice from Web Forms is the prominence of DI. DI has been a
guiding principle in the ASP.NET Core design. It supports customization of almost all aspects of the
ASP.NET Core framework. There’s even a built-in service provider that can be used for many scenarios.
If more customization is required, it can be supported by the many community projects. For example,
you can carry forward your third-party DI library investment.
In the Enable startup process section, a lifecycle event was raised by Web Forms as the
Application_BeginRequest method. This event isn’t available in ASP.NET Core. One way to achieve
this behavior is to implement middleware as seen in the Startup.cs file example. This middleware does
the same logic and then transfers control to the next handler in the middleware pipeline.
For more information on migrating modules and handlers, see Migrate HTTP handlers and modules to
ASP.NET Core middleware.
app.UseStaticFiles();
...
}
The eShop project enables basic static file access. There are many customizations available for static
file access. For information on enabling default files or a file browser, see Static files in ASP.NET Core.
For more information on bundling and minification, see Bundle and minify static assets in ASP.NET
Core.
For example, the details view is comprised of three files in the Web Forms project: Details.aspx,
Details.aspx.cs, and Details.aspx.designer.cs. When converting to Blazor, the code-behind and markup
are combined into Details.razor. Razor compilation (equivalent to what’s in .designer.cs files) is stored
in the obj directory and aren’t, by default, viewable in Solution Explorer. The Web Forms page
consists of the following markup:
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<asp:Image runat="server" CssClass="col-md-6 esh-picture" ImageUrl='<%#"/Pics/"
+ product.PictureFileName%>' />
<dl class="col-md-6 dl-horizontal">
<dt>Name
</dt>
<dd>
<asp:Label runat="server" Text='<%#product.Name%>' />
</dd>
<dt>Description
</dt>
<dd>
<asp:Label runat="server" Text='<%#product.Description%>' />
</dd>
<dt>Brand
</dt>
<dd>
<asp:Label runat="server" Text='<%#product.CatalogBrand.Brand%>' />
</dd>
<dt>Type
<dd>
<asp:Label runat="server" Text='<%#product.CatalogType.Type%>' />
</dd>
<dt>Price
</dt>
<dd>
<asp:Label CssClass="esh-price" runat="server"
Text='<%#product.Price%>' />
</dd>
<dt>Picture name
</dt>
<dd>
<asp:Label runat="server" Text='<%#product.PictureFileName%>' />
</dd>
<dt>Stock
</dt>
<dd>
<asp:Label runat="server" Text='<%#product.AvailableStock%>' />
</dd>
<dt>Restock
</dt>
<dd>
<asp:Label runat="server" Text='<%#product.RestockThreshold%>' />
</dd>
<dt>Max stock
</dt>
<dd>
<asp:Label runat="server" Text='<%#product.MaxStockThreshold%>' />
</dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
</asp:Content>
using eShopLegacyWebForms.Models;
using eShopLegacyWebForms.Services;
using log4net;
using System;
using System.Web.UI;
namespace eShopLegacyWebForms.Catalog
{
public partial class Details : System.Web.UI.Page
{
private static readonly ILog _log =
LogManager.GetLogger(System.Reflection.MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod().DeclaringType);
this.DataBind();
}
}
}
When converted to Blazor, the Web Forms page translates to the following code:
@page "/Catalog/Details/{id:int}"
@inject ICatalogService CatalogService
@inject ILogger<Details> Logger
<h2 class="esh-body-title">Details</h2>
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<img class="col-md-6 esh-picture" src="@($"/Pics/{_item.PictureFileName}")">
<dd>
@_item.Name
</dd>
<dt>
Description
</dt>
<dd>
@_item.Description
</dd>
<dt>
<dd>
@_item.CatalogBrand.Brand
</dd>
<dt>
Type
</dt>
<dd>
@_item.CatalogType.Type
</dd>
<dt>
Price
</dt>
<dd>
@_item.Price
</dd>
<dt>
Picture name
</dt>
<dd>
@_item.PictureFileName
</dd>
<dt>
Stock
</dt>
<dd>
@_item.AvailableStock
</dd>
<dt>
Restock
</dt>
<dd>
@_item.RestockThreshold
</dd>
<dt>
Max stock
</dt>
<dd>
@_item.MaxStockThreshold
</dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
@code {
private CatalogItem _item;
[Parameter]
public int Id { get; set; }
_item = CatalogService.FindCatalogItem(Id);
}
}
Notice that the code and markup are in the same file. Any required services are made accessible with
the @inject attribute. Per the @page directive, this page can be accessed at the
Catalog/Details/{id} route. The value of the route’s {id} placeholder has been constrained to an
integer. As described in the routing section, unlike Web Forms, a Razor component explicitly states its
route and any parameters that are included. Many Web Forms controls may not have exact
counterparts in Blazor. There’s often an equivalent HTML snippet that will serve the same purpose. For
example, the <asp:Label /> control can be replaced with an HTML <label> element.
For example, the Create.aspx page has a data entry form with validation. An example snippet would
look like this:
<div class="form-group">
<label class="control-label col-md-2">Name</label>
<div class="col-md-3">
<asp:TextBox ID="Name" runat="server" CssClass="form-control"></asp:TextBox>
<asp:RequiredFieldValidator runat="server" ControlToValidate="Name"
Display="Dynamic"
CssClass="field-validation-valid text-danger" ErrorMessage="The Name field is
required." />
</div>
</div>
<div class="form-group">
<label class="control-label col-md-2">Name</label>
<div class="col-md-3">
<InputText class="form-control" @bind-Value="_item.Name" />
<ValidationMessage For="(() => _item.Name)" />
</div>
</div>
...
</EditForm>
The EditForm context includes validation support and can be wrapped around input. Data
annotations are a common way to add validation. Such validation support can be added via the
DataAnnotationsValidator component. For more information on this mechanism, see ASP.NET Core
Blazor forms and validation.
Migrate configuration
In a Web Forms project, configuration data is most commonly stored in the web.config file. The
configuration data is accessed with ConfigurationManager. Services were often required to parse
objects. With .NET Framework 4.7.2, composability was added to configuration via
ConfigurationBuilders. These builders allowed developers to add various sources for configuration
that was then composed at runtime to retrieve the necessary values.
ASP.NET Core introduced a flexible configuration system that allows you to define the configuration
source or sources used by your app and deployment. The ConfigurationBuilder infrastructure that
you may be using in your Web Forms app was modeled after the concepts used in the ASP.NET Core
configuration system.
<configuration>
<configSections>
<section name="entityFramework"
type="System.Data.Entity.Internal.ConfigFile.EntityFrameworkSection, EntityFramework,
Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089"
requirePermission="false" />
</configSections>
<connectionStrings>
<add name="CatalogDBContext" connectionString="Data Source=(localdb)\MSSQLLocalDB;
Initial Catalog=Microsoft.eShopOnContainers.Services.CatalogDb; Integrated Security=True;
MultipleActiveResultSets=True;" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
</connectionStrings>
<appSettings>
<add key="UseMockData" value="true" />
<add key="UseCustomizationData" value="false" />
</appSettings>
It’s common for secrets, such as database connection strings, to be stored within the web.config. The
secrets are inevitably persisted in unsecure locations, such as source control. With Blazor on ASP.NET
Core, the preceding XML-based configuration is replaced with the following JSON:
{
"ConnectionStrings": {
"CatalogDBContext": "Data Source=(localdb)\\MSSQLLocalDB; Initial
Catalog=Microsoft.eShopOnContainers.Services.CatalogDb; Integrated Security=True;
MultipleActiveResultSets=True;"
},
"UseMockData": true,
"UseCustomizationData": false
}
JSON is the default configuration format; however, ASP.NET Core supports many other formats,
including XML. There are also several community-supported formats.
The constructor in the Blazor project’s Startup class accepts an IConfiguration instance through a
DI technique known as constructor injection:
...
}
• In .NET Framework, the DbContext object accepts a string of the form name=ConnectionString
and uses the connection string from ConfigurationManager.AppSettings[ConnectionString]
to connect. In .NET Core, this isn’t supported. The connection string must be supplied.
• The database was accessed in a synchronous way. Though this works, scalability may suffer. This
logic should be moved to an asynchronous pattern.
Although there isn’t the same native support for dataset binding, Blazor provides flexibility and power
with its C# support in a Razor page. For example, you can perform calculations and display the result.
For more information on data patterns in Blazor, see the Data access chapter.
Architectural changes
Finally, there are some important architectural differences to consider when migrating to Blazor. Many
of these changes are applicable to anything based on .NET Core or ASP.NET Core.
Because Blazor is built on .NET Core, there are considerations in ensuring support on .NET Core. Some
of the major changes include the removal of the following features:
• Multiple AppDomains
• Remoting
• Code Access Security (CAS)
• Security Transparency
For more information on techniques to identify necessary changes to support running on .NET Core,
see Port your code from .NET Framework to .NET Core.
ASP.NET Core is a reimagined version of ASP.NET and has some changes that may not initially seem
obvious. The main changes are:
Important
PREVIEW EDITION
This book is a preview edition and is currently under construction. If you have any feedback, submit it
at https://aka.ms/ebookfeedback.