Journal
Journal
Journal
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijrefrig
Received 7 September 1999; received in revised form and accepted 22 November 1999
Abstract
This paper presents local heat transfer results obtained during the condensation of Isceon 59, R407C and R404A in a
smooth horizontal tube. The results have been compared with existing correlations for condensation heat transfer to
assess the validity of these models for refrigerant mixtures. Two correlations (Dobson MK, Chato JC. Condensation in
smooth horizontal tubes. Journal of Heat Transfer, Transactions of ASME 1998; 120: 193±213, Shah MM. A general
correlation for heat transfer during ®lm condensation inside pipes. Int J Heat & Mass Transfer 1979; 22: 547±56) have
been considered because they deal with refrigerant blends and their range of applicability suited the experimental test
conditions. The Dobson and Chato correlation provided the best prediction for these refrigerant mixtures. The Shah
correlation ®tted the measurements of the local heat transfer coecients well and seem to cope well with refrigerant
mixtures. # 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd and IIR. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Heat transfer; Mass transfer; Condensation; Horizontal tube; R407C; R410A
0140-7007/00/$20.00 # 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd and IIR. All rights reserved.
PII: S0140-7007(99)00071-7
346 X. Boissieux et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 345±352
Nomenclature T Temperature ( C)
x Vapour quality
cp Speci®c heat capacity (J/kg.K)
Xtt Lockhart-Martinelli parameter
D Characteristic diameter (m)
Fr Froude number Greek characters
g Acceleration due to gravity (m2/s) Void fraction
G Mass ¯ux (kg/m2 s) Angle (radians)
Ga Galileo number Dynamic viscosity (Pa.s)
h Heat transfer coecient (W/m2 K) Density (kg/m3)
i Enthalpy (kJ/kg) Subscript
hfg Latent heat of vaporisation (J/kg) crit Critical
jg Wallis dimensionless gas velocity glide Glide (in temperature)
Jal Liquid Jakob number L Liquid
k Thermal conductivity (W/m K) red Reduced
Nu Nusselt number ref Refrigerant
P Pressure sat Saturation
Pr Prandtl number V Vapour
q0 Heat ¯ux (W/m2) w Wall
Re Reynolds number
because of the complexity of the two-phase ¯ow. The water ethylene glycol. A further cooling is made in the
range of test conditions for each correlation is very condenser, to make sure that the refrigerant enters the
important when comparing data, as indicated by Tichy sliding vane pump as a sub-cooled liquid. The satura-
et al. [10], Tandon et al. [11] and Thome [12]. It was, tion pressure in the refrigerant circuit is adjusted with
therefore, decided to consider correlations that suited the the accumulator, a pressure vessel which is pressurised
experimental test conditions. A full discussion of these with nitrogen. The tube tested was a 4-m long smooth
papers is given in Boissieux [1]. Chitti et al. [13] developed 3/800 copper tube, the same as for evaporation tests.
a purely theoretical model, validated with experimental The accuracy of the refrigerant heat transfer coe-
data for R22 and refrigerant mixtures, but the local heat cient has been estimated to 14% for the typical tem-
transfer was always limited to partial condensation over a perature dierence obtained with the test section (Part
limited mass ¯ux range (250<G<350 kg/m2s). I). Before testing the HFC refrigerants, the test section
Most of the alternatives for CFC and HCFC refrig- was successfully validated with R22. A heat balance was
erants consist of mixtures of two or three components, also carried out between the refrigerant and the water
and new problems were identi®ed with these refrigerant side as a further check on the accuracy of the local
blends. Because the classical theory for condensation experimental data.
heat transfer was developed for pure substances, new The refrigerant considered in this study are presented
research into refrigerant mixture was necessary, and led below with their designated nomenclature name (when
to the development of a refrigerant test facility at the available), along with their composition by mass.
University of Brighton.
Dobson and Chato [5] have extended their correlation R407C (23% R32/25% R125/52% R134a)
for pure refrigerants to consider zeotrope refrigerant R404A (44% R125/52% R143a/4% R134a)
blends such as R407C, by using a simpli®ed form of the Isceon 59 (47% R125/50% R134a/3% R600)
Dobson correlation. A traditional correlation from
Shah [14] has also been considered in this paper, since These refrigerant blends are non-ozone depleting ¯uids.
his correlation is often used for practical condenser R407C and Isceon 59 are alternative replacements for R22,
design because of its relative simplicity. and R404A is a substitute for R502. They are all ternary
mixtures, but R404A is a ``near-azeotropic'' mixture with a
small temperature glide of 0.6K (Dew temperature±Bubble
3. Experimental apparatus temperature at constant pressure), whereas R407C and
Isceon 59 have higher temperature glides (5.1 and 2.6K
The test facility used for obtaining the experimental respectively at 35 C bubble temperature). The thermo-
results for condensation is the same as the one for eva- dynamic properties of these three refrigerants were pro-
poration presented in Part I. It consists of a refrigerant vided by the refrigerant manufacturers, or taken from the
circuit and two secondary circuits. The sub-cooled literature (ASHRAE [15]). The refrigerant properties are
liquid refrigerant is pumped in the main circuit and presented in Table 1 for reference.
brought to the desired conditions in the test section by The composition of each refrigerant blend was
using a hot water circuit and a cold water/glycol circuit. checked at dierent stages to ensure that there were no
The sub-cooled refrigerant is ®rst heated up and evapo- variations during the test period. The change in mixture
rated in a plate heat exchanger, so that it enters the test composition could be induced by leaks in the system,
section as a superheated vapour. Full condensation then since the more volatile refrigerant would boil o, leaving
takes place in the test section, which is cooled with two components of the ternary mixture. The procedure
Table 1
Refrigerant properties
Tableau 1
ProprieÂteÂs des frigorigeÁnes
Refrigerant P [bar] Tglide [k] Statea Tsat i [kJ/kg] [Pa.s] [kg/m3] cp [J/kg K] k [W/m.K]
for testing the refrigerant composition consisted in tak- respectively (totaling 306 valid experimental measure-
ing liquid samples at dierent stages of the test period. ments). These data were all obtained for a full con-
The samples were taken in the liquid phase to ensure densation of the refrigerant along the tube. All these
that all the components of the mixture were present. results have been compared with the Dobson and Chato
The liquid was then expanded as a vapour into a sam- [5] and Shah [14] correlations on the parity plots shown
pling cylinder for analysis. The samples were analysed by in Figs. 4±9. These comparison graphs show all the valid
gas chromatography. No major variations in refrigerant experimental data points, covering the full phase change.
composition were observed. The highest change in com- The Dobson and Chato [5] correlation predicts well
position was around 0.1%, and resulting from the loss of the results for vapour quality below 70%, but it seems
a small volume of R600, the most volatile component of to over-predict the experimental data at higher qualities.
the mixture, in refrigerant Isceon 59. It was found that the experimental data were higher
than the calculated ones (from both Shah [14] and
Dosbon and Chato [5]) at low vapour qualities because
4. Comparison of experimental data with existing corre- of the higher heat ¯ux during some of the experiments.
lations These high heat ¯uxes were necessary to obtain a full
condensation of the refrigerant. A high experimental
The experimental heat transfer results are compared error in the low quality region is also caused by a small
with condensation correlations from Shah [14] and temperature dierence between the tube wall and the
Dobson and Chato [5] that best suited the experimental cooling water/Ethylene glycol. These large variation at
test conditions summarised in Table 2. Both correlations low vapour quality explains the data outside the 30%
provide local heat transfer coecients during condensa- deviation on all the parity plots.
tion, and could readily be compared with the experi-
mental results. The Dobson and Chato [5] model and
the Shah [14] correlation are presented in Appendices A
and B, respectively. Details of the experimental results
used for the development of these correlations can be
found in the original publications.
One typical example of condensation heat transfer
coecient is presented for each refrigerant in Figs. 1±3.
They show the variation of the local heat transfer coef-
®cient during the condensation. The condensation
graphs have been plotted with increasing quality, but it
must be kept in mind that the actual condensation pro-
cess starts with a vapour quality of 1 and ®nishes with a
vapour quality of 0. The experimental heat transfer
Fig. 1. Experimental and calculated local heat transfer coe-
coecient is approximately constant as condensation
cient for the condensation of Isceon 59.
takes place and the quality decreases to about 50%
liquid. Thereafter the local heat transfer coecient Fig. 1. Coecient d'eÂchanges locaux expeÂrimentaux et calculeÂs,
pour la condensation d'Isceon 59.
decreases steadily with a decrease in quality, towards the
value of the saturated liquid. The eects of the vapour
region on local heat transfer coecient at high quality do
not appear to follow the same trends as with evaporative
heat transfer (Part I).
The experimental results consist of 7, 9 and 10 valid
data sets for refrigerants R407C, R404A and Isceon 59
Table 2
Experimental test conditions
Tableau 2
Conditions experimentales
A fairly good agreement was obtained with the Dob- Fig. 6. Comparison of experimental data with the Dobson
son and Chato [5] correlation, as shown in parity plots correlation, condensation of R407C (dotted lines are 30%
in Figs. 4, 6 and 8 for refrigerant Isceon 59, R407C and deviation).
R404A, respectively. The deviations in the relative Fig. 6. Comparaison des reÂsultats expeÂrimentaux avec le modeÁle
errors are presented in Table 3. The relative error is de Dobson, pendant la condensation de R407C (les pointilleÂs
based on the following formula: repreÂsentent une deÂviation de 30%).
Fig. 7. Comparison of experimental data with the Shah correla- Fig. 9. Comparison of experimental data with the Shah correla-
tion, condensation of R407C (dotted lines are 30% deviation). tion, condensation of R404C (dotted lines are 30% deviation).
Fig. 7. Comparaison des reÂsultats expeÂrimentaux avec le modeÁle Fig. 9. Comparaison des reÂsultats expeÂrimentaux avec le modeÁle
de Shah, pendant la condensation de R407C (les pointilleÂs repreÂ- de Shah, pendant la condensation de R404C (les pointilleÂs repreÂ-
sentent une deÂviation de 30%). sentent une deÂviation de 30%).
Table 3
Comparison of the Dobson and Chato correlation with the
experimental data
Tableau 3
Comparaison entre la correÂlation de Dobson et Chato et les
donneÂs expeÂrimentales
Standard 15.0 6.1 6.3 9.1 The heat transfer coecient during wavy ¯ow is pre-
Mean 31.6 19.3 20.1 23.7 dicted with the following equation:
Average 1.3 1.9 1.2 1.5
0:2Re0:12
vo Ga PrL 0:25
Nu
The Shah correlation has been found satisfactory and 1 1:11X0:58 JaL
tt
A:5
consequently no new model has been developed for L
1ÿ Nuforced
condensation. The details of the Shah correlation can be
found in the original publication (Shah [14]) and are
summarised in Appendix B. where
GD
Vapour only Reynolds number; Revo
A:6
v
5. Conclusions
gL
L ÿ v D3
The condensation data obtained for the refrigerant Galileo number; Ga
A:7
2L
blends R404A, R407C and Isceon 59 with the test facil-
ity were in good agreement with the correlations from CP;L
Tsat ÿ Tw
Dobson and Chato [5] and Shah [14]. The Shah corre- Liquid Jakob number; JaL
A:8
hfg
lation for condensation heat transfer coecient was
found to predict adequately the local experimental r
c1
results, with an overall standard deviation of 9.1%. The Nuforced 0:0195Re0:8
L Pr 0:4
L 1:376 c2
A:9
Xtt
Dobson and Chato [5] correlation gave the best predic-
tion of the three refrigerants considered in this study,
with an average standard deviation of 7.6%. with c1 and c2 de®ned as follows: