RSH Qam11 ch06 PDF
RSH Qam11 ch06 PDF
RSH Qam11 ch06 PDF
To accompany
Quantitative Analysis for Management, Eleventh Edition,
by Render, Stair, and Hanna
Power Point slides created by Brian Peterson
Planning on What
Forecasting Controlling
Inventory to Stock
Parts/ Inventory
and How to Acquire
Product Levels
It
Demand
Feedback Measurements
to Revise Plans and
Forecasts
Figure
6.1
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8
Importance of Inventory Control
■ Storing resources.
■ Seasonal products may be stored to satisfy
off-season demand.
■ Materials can be stored as raw materials, work-
in-process, or finished goods.
■ Labor can be stored as a component of
partially completed subassemblies.
■ Compensate for irregular supply and
demand.
■ Demand and supply may not be constant over
time.
■ Inventory can be used to buffer the variability.
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 10
Importance of Inventory Control
Table 6.1
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13
Inventory Cost Factors
■ Ordering costs are generally independent of
order quantity.
■ Many involve personnel time.
■ The amount of work is the same no matter the
size of the order.
■ Carrying costs generally varies with the
amount of inventory, or the order size.
■ The labor, space, and other costs increase as the
order size increases.
■ The actual cost of items purchased can vary
if there are quantity discounts available.
Inventory
Level
Order Quantity = Q =
Maximum Inventory Level
Minimum
Inventory
0
Time
Figure
6.2
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 17
Inventory Costs in the EOQ Situation
INVENTORY LEVEL
DAY BEGINNING ENDING AVERAGE
April 1 (order received) 10 8 9
April 2 8 6 7
April 3 6 4 5
April 4 4 2 3
April 5 2 0 1
Maximum level April 1 = 10 units
Total of daily averages = 9 + 7 + 5 + 3 + 1 = 25
Number of days = 5
Table 6.2
Average inventory level = 25/5 = 5 units
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 18
Inventory Costs in the EOQ Situation
Carrying Cost
Curve
Ordering Cost Curve
Figure
6.3 Optimal Order Quantity
Order
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as PrenticeQuantity
Hall 21
Finding the EOQ
According to the graph, when the EOQ
assumptions are met, total cost is minimized when
annual ordering cost equals annual holding cost.
Solving for Q
Summary of equations:
Program
6.1A
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 26
Sumco Pump Company
Excel QM
Solution for
the Sumco
Pump
Company
Example
Program
6.1B
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 27
Purchase Cost of Inventory Items
■ Total inventory cost can be written to include the
cost of purchased items.
■ Given the EOQ assumptions, the annual
purchase cost is constant at D × C no matter the
order policy, where
■ C is the purchase cost per unit.
■ D is the annual demand in units.
■ At times it may be useful to know the average
dollar level of inventory:
thus
,
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 29
Sensitivity Analysis with the
EOQ Model
■ The EOQ model assumes all values are know and
fixed over time.
■ Generally, however, some values are estimated
or may change.
■ Determining the effects of these changes is
called sensitivity analysis.
■ Because of the square root in the formula,
changes in the inputs result in relatively small
changes in the order quantity.
=d×
L
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 32
Procomp’s Computer Chips
Figure
6.4
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 34
EOQ Without The Instantaneous
Receipt Assumption
■ When inventory accumulates over time, the
instantaneous receipt assumption does not apply.
■ Daily demand rate must be taken into account.
■ The revised model is often called the production
run model.
an
d
replaces
Summary of equations
1 2
. .
Program
6.2A
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 44
Brown Manufacturing
The Solution Results for the Brown Manufacturing
Problem Using Excel QM
Program
6.2B
wher
e D = annual demand in units
Co = ordering cost of each order
C = cost per unit
Ch = holding or carrying cost per unit per
year
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 46
Quantity Discount Models
■ Quantity discounts
Because unit are
costcommonly available.
is now variable,
■ The basic EOQ model is adjusted by adding in the
Holding cost = Ch = IC
purchase or materials cost.
I = holding cost as a percentage of the unit cost (C)
Total cost = Material cost + Ordering cost + Holding
cost
wher
e D = annual demand in units
Co = ordering cost of each order
C = cost per unit
Ch = holding or carrying cost per unit per
year
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 47
Quantity Discount Models
■ A typical quantity discount schedule can look
like the table below.
■ However, buying at the lowest unit cost is not
always the best choice.
Table 6.3
Figure
6.6 0 1,00 2,00
0 0
Order
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Quantity 49
Brass Department Store
■ Brass Department Store stocks toy race cars.
■ Their supplier has given them the quantity
discount schedule shown in Table 6.3.
■ Annual demand is 5,000 cars, ordering cost is $49, and
holding cost is 20% of the cost of the car
■ The first step is to compute EOQ values for each
discount.
Q1 = 700
Q2 =
1,000
Q3 =
2,000
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 51
Brass Department Store
Program
6.3A
Program
6.3B
Figure
6.7
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 57
ROP with Known Stockout Costs
Where:
μ= X=?
Figure 350
6.8
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 61
Hinsdale Company Example
■ From Appendix A we find Z = 1.65
■ Solving for safety stock:
5% Area of
Normal Curve
Figure SS
6.9
μ= X=?
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 350 62
Hinsdale Company
■ Different safety stock levels will be generated for
different service levels.
■ However, the relationship is not linear.
■ You should be aware of what a service level is costing
in terms of carrying the safety stock in inventory.
■ The relationship between Z and safety stock can
be developed as follows:
1. We know
that 4. So we
2. We also know that SS = X – μ have SS =
Zσ
3. = Z(10)
Thus
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 63
Hinsdale Company
Safety Stock at different service levels
SERVICE Z VALUE FROM SAFETY STOCK
LEVEL (%) NORMAL CURVE TABLE (UNITS)
90 1.28 12.8
91 1.34 13.4
92 1.41 14.1
93 1.48 14.8
94 1.55 15.5
95 1.65 16.5
96 1.75 17.5
97 1.88 18.8
98 2.05 20.5
99 2.33 23.3
Table 6.5
99.99 3.72 37.2
Figure
6.9
Where:
Where:
ROP = 15(4)+1.88(3*2)
= 60 + 11.28
=71.28
ROP = 25(6)+2.05(25*3)
= 150+153.75
=303.75
ROP = 100+1.55(40.99)
= 163.53
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 72
Calculating Annual Holding
Cost with Safety Stock
■ Under standard assumptions of
EOQ, average inventory is just Q/2.
■ So annual holding cost is: (Q/2)*Ch.
■ This is not the case with safety
stock because safety stock is not
meant to be drawn down.
Where:
THC = total annual holding cost
Q = order quantity
Ch = holding cost per unit per year
SS = safety stock
Program
6.4A
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 75
Excel QM Solution to the
Hinsdale Safety Stock Problem
Program
6.4B
P(MP) ≥ ML – P(ML)
P(MP) + P(ML) ≥ ML or
P(MP + ML) ≥ ML
MP = Marginal profit = $6 – $4 =
$2
■ The marginal loss is $4 per carton since cartons
can not be returned or salvaged.
Let P = 0.40.
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 88
Joe’s Stocking Decision for
the Chicago Tribune
Step 2. Using the normal distribution in Figure
6.10, we find the appropriate Z value
Z = 0.25 standard deviations from the mean
Area under the Curve is 1 – 0.40 =
0.60 ( Z = 0.25) Mean Daily
Sales
μ= X* X = Demand
Figure
50
6.10
Optimal Stocking Policy (62 Newspapers)
or
■ From Appendix A:
A 70 10 Yes
B 20 20 In some cases
C 10 70 No
Table 6.8
1 B(2 C(3
) )
1 2 3 4 5 6
Required Date 50
A Lead Time = 1 Week
Order Release 50
A Gross 50 1
On-Hand 10 10
Net 40
Order Receipt 40
Order Release 40
B Gross 80A 2
On-Hand 15 15
Net 65
Order Receipt 65
Order Release
Figure 65
6.14(a)
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 105
Net Material Requirements Plan
for 50 Units of A
Week Lead
Item 1 2 3 4 5 6 Time
C Gross 120A 1
On-Hand 20 10
Net 100
Order Receipt 100
Order Release 100
D Gross 130B 1
On-Hand 10 10
Net 120
Order Receipt 120
Order
Figure Release
6.14(b) 120
D(3 F(2)
)
■ If we require 10 units of AA, the gross
requirements for parts D and F can be computed:
Part D: 3 × number of AA’s = 3 × 10 = 30
Part F: 2 × number of AA’s = 2 × 10 = 20
Figure
6.15
P-kanban C-kanban
and and
Container Container
4 1
3 2
Figure
6.16
■ Drawbacks to ERP:
■ The software is expensive to buy and costly to
customize.
■ Small systems can cost hundreds of thousands of
dollars.
■ Large systems can cost hundreds of millions.
■ The implementation of an ERP system may
require a company to change its normal
operations.
■ Employees are often resistant to change.
■ Training employees on the use of the new
software can be expensive.