Delos Reyes V Solidum G.R. No. 42798 BOYONEN Elective Officials Chapter 1 Qualifications and Election
Delos Reyes V Solidum G.R. No. 42798 BOYONEN Elective Officials Chapter 1 Qualifications and Election
Delos Reyes V Solidum G.R. No. 42798 BOYONEN Elective Officials Chapter 1 Qualifications and Election
JD I
Facts:
Case Statement:
The Court of First Instance of Capiz, held that the respondent is eligible to the
office of municipal president of Ibajay, Capiz.
Hence, this appeal by the petitioner Guillermo de los Reyes. In support of his
appeal, appellant alleged the following errors committed by the trial court to wit:
"1. The lower court erred in not declaring that the respondent, Moises T. Solidum,
had not at the time of the general elections of June 5, 1934, the requisite
qualification of one year residence in the municipality of Ibajay, Province of
Capiz, in which he offered and announced himself a candidate for the office of
municipal president.
"2. The lower court erred' in not declaring that the respondent, Moises T. Solidum,
is ineligible to the office of municipal president of the municipality of Ibajay,
Province of Capiz to which he has been proclaimed elected."virtua1aw
Issue:
Whether or not at the time of the general elections on June 5, 1934, Moises T.
Solidum had the requisite one-year residence in the municipality of Ibajay, Capiz,
wherein he offered and announced himself as a candidate for municipal president.
Ruling:
Yes.
In Yra v. Abaño (52 Phil., 380), this court held that "the question of residence for
the purposes of the Election Law is largely one of intention."
In Tanseco v. Arteche (57 Phil., 227, 235), it was likewise held that
"The question of domicile is admittedly a question largely of intention, but this
intention must be sought in contemporaneous words and acts."
Considering all the circumstances of the case, we cannot and do not believe that
the respondent Moises T. Solidum has ever abandoned his actual residence in
Ibajay or his intention to continue residing therein, as the voters of said
municipality did not believe so when they continuously and consistently voted for
him either as councilor or as municipal president from 1922 until 1934. It is not
necessary that a person should have a house in order to establish his residence and
domicile in a municipality. It is enough that he should live in said municipality,
whether alone or with his family in his own dwelling, or in a rented house, or in
that of a friend or relative, in order to acquire a residence and domicile in said
municipality, provided that his stay is accompanied by an intention to reside
therein permanently.
For the foregoing considerations, we are of the opinion and so hold: (1) That the
respondent, born in the municipality of Ibajay, baptized, grown up, married, paid
his cedula tax, registered as a voter, exercised the right of suffrage, and elected
once as councilor and three times as municipal president of said municipality, is
legally a resident thereof notwithstanding the fact that he constructed a house in
another municipality for purposes of business, had his family lived there and
educated his children in the schools of said municipality; and (2) that the fact that
the respondent stated in his petition to cancel his homestead application and in
various motions filed with the Court of First Instance of Capiz, that his residence is
the municipality of Navas, does not destroy his residence in Ibajay or his intention
to reside therein permanently.
The Supreme Court held, that the respondent at the time of the general elections on
June 5, 1934, had the requisite one-year residence in the municipality of Ibajay,
Capiz, wherein he offered and announced himself as a candidate for municipal
president.
Principle:
Residence Requirement. It is not necessary that a person should have a
house in order to establish his residence and domicile in a municipality. It is
enough that he should live in said municipality, whether alone or with his family in
his own dwelling, or in a rented house, or in that of a friend or relative, in order to
acquire a residence and domicile in said municipality, provided that his stay is
accompanied by an intention to reside therein permanently.