Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Classroom Assessment Techniques: Concept Maps
Classroom Assessment Techniques: Concept Maps
Concept Maps
A concept map is a graphical representation of a student's knowledge about a topic
(Zeilik and others, 1997; McClure and other, 1999). Concept maps are pictorial essays, a
method of illustrating the principal concepts of a lesson from the main points. They
include the supporting information that indicates how a student has organized his/her
ideas. Good concept maps force their creators to challenge their own understanding and
to build a strong foundation for information that follows. A poorly constructed map
allows a reviewer to quickly identify gaps in logic or comprehension. Concept maps will
vary from person to person, no two will be alike. They allow for creative thinking in their
construction. Concept maps have two principal components (Fig. 1):
1. Terms or concepts - often presented in boxes;
2. Directional links (arrows) and linking phrases (prepositions) - that connect the terms.
Concept maps identify the relationships between components and therefore correspond to
synthesis in Bloom’s taxonomy. The number of levels in a concept map can be readily
counted. The terms are joined by logical linking phrases appropriate for the topic. To
speed formal assessment the maps can be readily evaluated as good, average, or poor.
Alternatively, one can construct a formal scoring scheme (see caption, Fig. 1). McClure
and other (1999) assessed a variety of grading strategies and found the most accurate
method scored each concept pair (two concepts and the linking phrase).
Figure 1. A simple concept map that illustrates the relationship between the elements of
the scientific method. One potential scoring scheme would award 5 points per
hierarchical level (4 levels present); 1 point for each reasonable linking phrase
between adjacent points (13 links). Using this scheme the concept map would earn
33 points.
References
McClure, J.R., B. Sonak, and H.K. Suen, Concept map assessment of classroom
learning: reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 1999, 36(4): p. 475-492.
Zeilik, M, C. Schau, N. Mattern, S. Hall, K. Teague, and W. Bisard, Conceptual
astronomy: A novel model for teaching post-secondary science courses. American
Journal of Physics, 1997, 65, p. 987-996.