Livestock Feeds and Feeding: Bulletin July
Livestock Feeds and Feeding: Bulletin July
Livestock Feeds and Feeding: Bulletin July
Livestock Feeds
and Feeding
EXTENSION SERVICE
COLORADO STATE COLLEGE
FORT COLLINS
Foreword
There is no business in which experience counts for more
than it does in livestock feeding. Books, bulletins and feeding
experiments are of value to the man who has had actual ex-
perience to tie them to. He must be able to decide how well what
he reads fits his conditions. Methods and rations successfully
used in one part of the country might not be economical for him
to use in his particular section. Even a practice which was
good on the next ranch might not be best for him because his
conditions might be different and a different treatment required.
It is up to each breeder and feeder to select the ration or prac-
tice which seems best adapted to his particular ranch, keeping
economy and suitableness of the ration for a particular class of
livestock uppermost in his mind.
The correct rationing of feeds to livestock on a farm or
ranch can save many dollars during the year in the production
of livestock products. Colorado has a wide variety of farm-
grown feeds which can be used to produce as cheap and efficient
rations as are available in any other section of the country.
"The most efficient livestock production is secured by feed-
ing an adequate ration from the time of the animal's birth. The
younger an animal is the more efficiently it uses its feed for
growth or finish. Young animals should never be stunted.
Neither should they be kept in too high condition, especially
through the winter maintenance period when feed costs are rel-
atively high. Mature animals should be maintained in thrifty,
vigorous condition."*
It is the purpose of the following material to point out cer-
tain facts which might be of interest to the feeder of livestock.
*Feed for Profit, Utah Extension Circular 2, New Series, No. 81.
FEEDS
All feeds may be divided into two classes-roughages and
concentrates. Roughages are feeds which are high in fiber
and low in total digestible nutrients and include such common
feeds as alfalfa, grass hay, corn fodder, sorghun1 fodder, silage,
straw, etc.
Concentrates are feeds which are high in total digestible nu-
trients, and low in fiber. They include such feeds as barley and
the other grains, cottonseed meal, soybean meal, wheat bran,
etc.
Roughages are further divided into carbohydrate roughages
and protein roughages. Carbohydrate roughages include wild
hay, timothy hay, corn fodder, silage, sorghum fodder, etc. Pro-
tein roughages include alfalfa hay, clover hay, soybean hay, etc.
The concentrates are divided in the same way. Protein con-
centrates include soybeans, soybean meal, cottonseed meal, wheat
bran, flax seed, linseed meal, shorts, middlings, tankage, meat
m·eal, fish meal and dry beans. Carbohydrates include corn,
wheat, oats, barley, dried beet pulp.
(Protein roughages
Roughages (
(Carbohydrate roughages
(Protein concentrates
Concentrates (
(Carbohydrate concentrates
Carbohydrates-Fats and Proteins.-We usually think of
fats, carbohydrates and proteins as being the essential nutrients
in a ration. This is only partly true since minerals, vitamins,
water and air are just as essential. Fats and carbohydrates are
the energy foods and in the process of digestion are broken down
into simple forms which can be utilized by the animal's body in
producing milk, work, fat, etc. The carbohydrates include the
sugars, starches and similar materials in the plant. The fat is
the natural fat in the plants and is utilized the same as the car-
bohydrates.
4 COLORADO STATE COLLEGE Ext. 384-A
Total
Digestible digestible Nutritive
Feeds Dry matter protein nutrients ratio
TABLE 2
Total
Digestible digestible Nutritive
Ration Dry matter protein nutrients ratio
Preparation of Feeds
At one time elaborate preparation of feeds was very popu-
lar, but experience has shown that much of the elaborate prep-
aration which was once made was both uneconomical and use-
less. Since preparation is costly, it is economical to know just
how much is advisable. The farmer wants to know whether it
pays to grind, crush, cut, cook or ferment a grain or a roughage.
It is assumed that much labor is saved the animal if the feed
July 1944 LIVESTOCK FEEDS AND FEEDING 11
is so prepared that he can swallow it without chewing. Experi-
ments at many stations show that making a feed so fine and
soft that it can be swallowed without chewing not only does not
pay the cost of preparation but actually lowers the feeding
value. On the other hand, some preparation of certain feeds is
justified. Unpalatable feeds may be readily eaten if ground
and mixed with more palatable feeds.
Grinding Small Grains.-All of the small grains-wheat,
oats, barley or the sorghum grains-should be ground or rolled
for all animals except sheep. Rolling is preferable to grinding
since less trouble from bloat will result.
None of the grains should be ground fine. Fine grinding
makes the grain less palatable and less digestible. Also, it costs
more to grind fine. Fine grinding is desirable only when using
screenings. They should be ground fine enough to break all
weed seeds.
Cutting or Grinding Hay.-The cutting or grinding of hay
is a practice which, during recent years, has become rather com-
mon. Extravagant claims have been made for the practice,
many of which have little or nothing to back them up. The
saving of hay is one claim often given in favor of this practice.
It is doubtful if more than 10 percent of the hay is refused by
fattening animals if it is of reasonably good quality; even if hay
is $20 per ton this would only be $2 worth of hay. Since it costs
$3.50 to $4 per ton to grind hay, it is difficult to see how spend-
ing $3.50 to $4 to save $2 can be economical. Also, in grinding,
there is a loss of 3 to 5 percent by weight and this loss may be
considerably higher-sometimes, under certain conditions, twice
this much. Another t hing which should be remembered but is
1
often forgotten, is the fact that the hay refused by the animals
is composed of the stems and coarse material which is not worth
$20 per ton or whatever the original cost of the hay may be.
These refused stems need not be lost if there is other livestock
being wintered, such as stock cattle or idle horses.
"It was found at the Wisconsin Experiment Station that it
did not pay to chop a fair grade of hay for dairy cows nor the
same kind of hay for beef cows with suckling calves. Most ex-
periments with chopping good quality hay for horses and cows
have shown this practice to be uneconomical."* If hay is
chopped, coarse chopping is better than fine grinding. It costs
less and gives better results. Experiments at the Pennsylvania
Station showed that where hay was ground fine, it was less di-
*G. Bostedt, Wisconsin Extension F!ervice, Circular No. 286, p, 16.
12 COLORADO STATE COLLEGE Ext. 384-A
seed cake or soybean oil meal will be needed per day. But if
wheat or barley straw is used, 1~ pounds of cottonseed cake or
soybean meal will be necessary. Also, it must be remembered
that straw from grain which has been combined is much less
valuable than that from grain which was cut at the right time
with a binder.
In the eastern part of the State, many of the range cattle
are on the range all winter and obtain most of their feed from
grass which was left over from the summer and has cured dur-
ing the fall. Such feed is very low in protein, containing less
than 1 percent. It gives satisfactory results only when it is
properly supplemented with some protein supplement. One and
one-half pounds of cottonseed cake per day, or any other feed
furnishing an equal amount of protein, will bring cows through
the winter in satisfactory shape.
Many cattle are also fed on sorghum or corn stover during
the winter, but both of these feeds are low in protein and the
cattle should be fed in addition about a pound of cottonseed cake
per day.
Alfalfa hay is a good protein feed which is sometimes over-
looked. Three and one-half to four pounds of good alfalfa con-
tain as much protein as 1 pound of cottonseed cake or soybean
meal. It also contains twice as much total digestible nutrients.
Any time that 1 ton of alfalfa hay can be bought for 14 as much
as cottonseed cake costs, it is a better buy.
The calves should be allowed all the wild hay or straw they
will eat.
Fattening Cattle
1. Feed the kind and type of cattle which will be in de-
mand on the market.
2. Finish cattle according to the market demand.
3. Cattle like variety. A good variety of feeds generally
improve a ration.
4. Beet molasses in limited amounts (1 to 3 pounds) is
fully equal to grain and may improve the palatability of the
ration.
5. Beet-by-product rations generally are deficient in phos-
phorus and require a phosphorus supplement for most efficient
rations. Use 1j10 of a pound of steamed bonemeal, 2 to 3 pounds
of wheat bran or 1 to 11;2 pounds of cottonseed cake daily.
6. A heavy ration of wheat or barley may cause indigestion
and bloat unless mixed with some bulky feed. If possible, pour
these grains over silage or make the ration so it contains one-fifth
of its weight in wheat bran, dried beet pulp or rolled or ground
oats.
July 1944 LIVESTOCK FEEDS AND FEEDING 15
of cutting. Other factors may also enter in. Alfalfa cut before
bloom contains 19 percent or more protein; one-tenth to one-half
bloom, 14.9 percent; three-fourths to full bloom, 12.8 percent;
past full bloom, 12.8 percent. Alfalfa leafmeal may contain 22
percent; alfalfa stem, 7 percent; alfalfa straw, 8.5 percent. For
the farmer who wants to produce as much protein as possible
on his farm, it is necessary that he know when to cut and how
to handle alfalfa to achieve the desired result.
APPENDIX*
Total
Dry Digestible digestible Nutritive
matter protein nutrients ratio
2. Fattening yearling
cattle
Weight 600 13.2 to 16.3 1.20 to 1.41 10.3 to 12.7 7.0 to 8.0
Weight 700 15.2 to 18.3 1.41 to 1.60 12.0 to 14.4 7.0 to 8.0
Weight 800 17.0 to 20.3 1.59 to 1.79 13.5 to 16.1 7.0 to 8.0
Weight 900 18.5 to 21.8 1.74 to 1.94 14.8 to 17.4 7.0 to 8.0
Weight 1000 19.7 to 22.9 1.87 to 2.06 15.9 to 18.5 7.0 to 8.0
3. Wintering beef
calves to gain 0. 75
to 1.00 pound per
head daily
Weight 400 8.7 to 10.3 0.63 to 0.70 4.8 to 5.7 6.7 to 7.0
Weight 500 10.3 to 12.1 0.71 to 0.78 5.7 to 6.7 7.1 to 7.6
Weight 600 11.7 to 13.9 0.79 to 0.88 6.5 to 7.7 7.3 to 7.8
4. Wintering preg-
nant beef cows
Weight 900 13.1 to 18.4 0.56 to 0.65 6.9 to 9.7 10.0 to 15.0
Weight 1000 14.2 to 20.0 0.60 to 9.70 7.5 to 10.5 10.0 to 15.0
Weight 1100 15.2 to 21.5 0.64 to 0.75 8.0 to 11.3 10.0 to 15.0
Weight 1200 16.3 to 22.8 0.69 to 0.80 8.6 to 12.0 10.0 to 15.0
5. Pregnant ewes-
up to 4 to 6 weeks
before lambing
Weight 110 2.2 to 2.4 0.17 to 0.20 1.6 to 1.9 7.5 to 8.5
Weight 120 2.3 to 2.6 0.18 to 0.21 1.7 to 2.0 7.5 to 8.5
Weight 130 2.4 to 2.8 0.19 to 0.22 1.8 to 2.1 7.5 to 8.5
6. Pregnant ewes-
last 4 to 6 weeks
before lambing
Weight 110 2.7 to 2.9 0.22 to 0.25 2.0 to 2.3 7.2 to 8.2
Weight 120 2.8 to 3.1 0.23 to 0.26 2.1 to 2.4 7.2 to 8.2
Weight 130 2.9 to 3.3 0.24 to 0.27 2.2 to 2.5 7.2 to 8.2
7. Ewes nursing
lambs
Weight 110 3.1 to 3.3 0.28 to 0.31 2.4 to 2.7 6.7 to 7.7
Weight 120 3.2 to 3.5 0.29 to 0.32 2.5 to 2.8 6.7 to 7.7
Weight 130 3.3 to 3.7 0.30 to 0.33 2.6 to 2.9 6.7 to 7.7
8. Fattening lambs
Weight 60 2.0 to 3.5 0.20 to 0.23 1.5 to 1.8 6.7 to 7.2
Weight 70 2.2 to 2.7 0.21 to 0.24 1.7 to 2.0 6.9 to 7.4
Weight 80 2.3 to 2.8 0.22 to 0.25 1.8 to 2.1 7.1 to 7.6
Weight 90 2.4 to 2.9 0.23 to 0.26 1.9 to 2.2 7.3 to 7.8
18 COLORADO STATE COLLEGE Ext. 384-A
Total
Dry Digestible digestible Nutritive
matter protein nutrients ratio
9. Wintering
pregnant gilts
Weight 250 2.9 to 4.7 0.50 to 0.55 3.5 to 4.2 6.0 to 7.0
Weight 300 4.4 to 5.4 0.57 to 0.63 4.0 to 4.8 6.0 to 7.0
10. Wintering
pregnant sows
Weight 400 4.6 to 5.6 0.53 to 0.60 4.0 to 5.0 6.5 to 7.5
Weight 600 6.2 to 7.6 0.72 to 0.81 5.4 to 6.8 6.5 to 7.5
11. Brood sows
nursing litters
Weight 400 9.4 to 11.5 1.22 to 1.29 8.5 to 10.0 6.0 to 7.0
Weight 600 11.2 to 13.8 1.32 to 1.42 9.4 to 11.0 6.0 to 7.0
12. Growing and
fattening pigs
Weight 50 2.1 to 2.8 0.35 to 0.43 1.9 to 2.5 4.5 to 5.0
Weight 75 2.9 to 3.9 0.43 to 0.52 2.6 to 3.5 5.3 to 5.8
Weight 100 3.6 to 4.8 0.50 to 0.60 3.2 to 4.3 5.8 to 6.2
Weight 150 4.8 to 6.2 0.65 to 0.75 4.3 to 5.6 6.2 to 6.5
Weight 200 5.8 to 7.1 0.73 to 0.83 5.2 to 6.4 6.4 to 6.7
Silage
Corn dent, well matured ______________________ .283 .013 .187 13.4
Corn dent, immature ____________________________ .204 .010 .133 12.3
Alfalfa, wilted before being ensiled .540 .051 .290 4.7
Alfalfa-high in water ________________________ .230 .019 .127 5.7
Concentrates
Barley ---------------------------------------------------- .904 .093 .787 7.5
Beans, field ______________________________________________ .882 .199 .756 2.8
Beans, pinto ____________________________________________ .909 .134 .648 3.8
Beet pulp dried-molasses __________________ .918 .061 .743 11.2
Beet pulp dried ______________________________________ .920 .048 .718 14.0
Beet pulp wet ________________________________________ .116 .008 .089 10.1
Beet pulp wet pressed __________________________ .142 .007 .110 14.7
Corn dent No. 2------------------------------------ .852 .071 .806 10.3
Cottonseed meal 45 percent and over .930 .378 .809 1.1
Cottonseed meal 43 percent protein ..... 930 .350 .758 1.2
Cottonseed meal 40 percent protein ..... 928 .359 .736 1.2
Flax seed .... -------------------------------------------- .936 .214 1.087 4.1
Linseed meal 33 to 37 percent protein .913 .307 .784 1.6
Molasses beet __________________________________________ .806 .025 .588 22.5
Molasses beet-Steffen's process ....... 802 .048 .599 11.5
Oats -------------------------------------------------------- .911 .075 .755 9.1
Peanut oilmeal-43 to 45 percent
protein -------------------------------------------- .935 .386 .809 1.1
Skimmilk-centrifugal ------------------------ .096 .035 .086 1.5
Sorghum grain -------------------------------------- .888 .056 .743 12.3
Soybean oilmeal-48 percent protein
or over ______________________________________________ .93 .424 .838 1.0
Soybean oilmeal-43 to 48 percent
protein -------------------------------------------- .919 .376 .828 1.2
Tankage-60 percent ____________________________ .922 .564 .780 0.4
Tankage-55 percent____________________________ .927 .515 .742 0.4
Wheat bran-all analysis ____________________ .906 .131 .702 4.4
Wheat (Rocky Mountain State) ________ .915 .114 .857 6.5
Wheat middlings ____________________________________ .896 .150 .795 4.3
Wheat shorts __________________________________________ .901 .150 .789 4.3
I
*Morrison's Feeds & Feeding, 20th Edition, Ithaca, New York.