SC-540 The Synoptic Gospels Syllabus 2018: I. Course Description
SC-540 The Synoptic Gospels Syllabus 2018: I. Course Description
SC-540 The Synoptic Gospels Syllabus 2018: I. Course Description
Syllabus 2018
Shanell T. Smith, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of New Testament and Christian Origins
Email Policy: The instructor will use the official HartSem student email addresses for all
communications. Please check your HartSem email account regularly.
I. Course Description
The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are the earliest surviving accounts of the life and
ministry of Jesus. This course will provide a detailed examination of these texts, paying special
attention to the distinctive portrait of Jesus that each gospel presents. We will study these biblical
texts in their ancient contexts and discuss contemporary application. We will explore various
theories regarding the so-called “Synoptic Problem”: Which gospel do you think came first? But
that’s not all! We will also survey different critical methods in Gospel analysis such as literary,
redaction, socio-historical, and tradition-critical. Best of all: we will have fun doing it!
II. Objectives
To help students:
Gain an in-depth comprehension of the Synoptic Gospels
Explore the historical and social background from which each Synoptic derives
Articulate the similarities and differences among the various portraits of Jesus in the Synoptics
Critically evaluate secondary scholarship (monographs, articles, essays, commentaries, etc.) by
asking questions and challenging arguments based on the student’s own biblical analysis
Discover that “context matters,” and in the process, learn how to read the Synoptics with
theological and ethical sensitivity
2. Mark L. Strauss, Four Portraits, One Jesus: A Survey of Jesus and the Gospels (Zondervan,
2007). [ISBN: 978-0310226970]
1. Brian K. Blount et al., eds. True to Our Native Land: An African American New Testament
Commentary (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2007). [ISBN: 978-0800634216]
2. Daniel J. Harrington, SJ, The Synoptic Gospels Set Free: Preaching Without Anti-Judaism
(New York: Paulist Press, 2009). [978-0809145836]
3. Frank J. Matera, New Testament Christology (Westminster John Knox Press, 1999). [ISBN:
978-0664256944]
4. Carol A. Newsom, Sharon H. Ringe, and Jacqueline E. Lapsley, eds. Women’s Bible
Commentary: Revised and Updated (Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press, 2012).
[ISBN: 978-0664237073]
5. Daniel Patte, ed. Global Bible Commentary (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 2004). [ISBN:
978-0687064038]
Regular attendance at all class sessions and active participation in discussion groups
are expected. If you are unable to attend a class session, please notify the professor in advance
or at the earliest opportunity via email. Please plan to arrive promptly to class, and stay for its
duration. It is also important that students return promptly after class breaks. Missing two
sessions without a legitimate excuse will result in an automatic lowering of your final grade
by 10%. Missing three or more sessions without explanation or permission will result in
automatic failure of the course.
Your presence is necessary and important for maximal learning for everyone. Be ready to
ask questions and participate in discussions in a positive and constructive way. Rich, critical
dialogue occurs when we discuss, debate, and consider the texts and various issues as a
collective. Care should be taken when speaking; however, to make sure that everyone (including
the less talkative ones) gets an opportunity to engage.
Students will write an essay comparing and contrasting two of the Synoptic Gospels. It will
address the following:
Students will present responses in essay form. Do not woodenly answer each question in the
order above, and no bullet points. Gather all of the information for each gospel, answering the
questions above, and then put it all together. You got this!
PROOFREAD. Again…proofread.
AVOID PLAGAIRISM. Use footnotes1 and/or parenthetical citations (e.g. Strauss, 207), to
acknowledge your debts to the scholarly literature on which you draw. Keep direct quotations to
a minimum, however. It is your voice that I want to hear in these analyses. Include scriptural
references when referring to specific parts of the primary text. E.g. (Matt. 7:2) Do not cut/paste
large sections of scripture.
Essay specifications:
Length: 5 pages (1,200 word minimum – 1,300 word maximum)
Please note: Once word limit is reached, I will stop reading. Students will be penalized
for what’s “missing.”
Due Date: Monday, November 26, 2018. Please bring a printed copy to class and email to
ssmith@hartsem.edu by 7pm.
1
Shanell T. Smith, This Is Just an Example on How to Footnote (Hartford, CT: Synoptic Gospel Press, 2016), 15.
Smith, SC-540 p.3
The best presentations encourage discussion, and the most helpful handouts offer
resources for further study. In other words, an effective presentation does not involve reading a
lengthy handout to the class. Neither the manuscript nor the handout is to be a printout of one’s
PowerPoint slides.
Topics may include: “Jesus and the Jerusalem Temple; “Material Possession in Luke”;
“The Disciples in Mark”; “The Poor Widow of Mark 12”; “The Messianic Secret in Mark”; “The
Prodigal Son”; “How Jewish is Jesus in Matthew?”; “Jesus – The Teacher in Matthew”; “Jesus’
Miracles in the Synoptics”; “The Women at the Tomb in the Synoptics”; “The Forgiveness of
Sins in the Synoptics” (to name a few).
Students will write a 1000-1250 word reflection (4 to 5 pages) that will consider the
following question:
“Diversity is a given – a fact of life. Thus, how we view it (productive, harmful, difficult
to overcome, fecund, etc.) is the question. Generally speaking, and from your own interreligious
context, how (can) the study of the Synoptic Gospels, with their presentation of various portraits
of Jesus, inform how we do interreligious dialogue? How does it affect how you engage with
others of various religious affiliations? Does difference hinder or help dialogue? What are some
lessons to be learned in multiplicity?”
Due Date: Monday, December 17, 2018 LAST DAY OF CLASS. Students will email
their papers to the professor by the start of class time. Students should make every effort to
attend this class, as the presentation itself is 25% of this assignment’s grade.
Grades range from A to C and F; A+’s and C-’s are not part of the grading system.
On a 4.0 GPA scale – A (4.00), A-(3.66), B+(3.33), B(3.00), B-(2.66), C+(2.33), C(2.00)
and F(0.00). A grade point average of no less than B- (2.66) is required to maintain good
standing. The minimum G.P.A. required for graduation is 2.75.
DMin students: High Pass (95-100), Pass (83-94), Low Pass (70-82), and Fail (below 70)
Inclusive Language:
Hartford Seminary is committed to a policy of inclusion in its academic life and mission. All
members of the community are expected to communicate in language that reflects the equality of
genders, openness to diverse cultural and theological perspectives, and sensitivity to one
another’s images of God.
Extensions:
Extensions for papers will be given for illnesses or family emergencies only in consultation with
the instructor.
Official Handbooks:
For all other questions you might have regarding policies or procedures, please check the student
handbook http://www.hartsem.edu/current-students/student-handbook/ and seminary policies at
Academic policies are listed at http://www.hartsem.edu/current-students/policies/
With that said, we will have our missing class completely online. Here’s what’s expected:
Students will interview two people regarding their views about Jesus of Nazareth. After doing
this you are to fill out the interview for yourself. (Thus, there are three interviews in total.) I will
mark it based on the effort apparent in the answers. Please ask your interviewees to take this
seriously and to give thought to their responses. It is important that you probe them for detail and
specification in their answers. Some guidelines:
- One interviewee may be a fellow student who is NOT taking this course.
- The other interviewee is to be someone of another generation than yourself
(this is to explore generational differences in thinking about Jesus).
- If you can interview someone of a non-Christian religion (Muslim, Jew, etc.),
that would be very interesting. (And it shouldn’t be hard to do here at Hartford
Seminary!)
- If your interviewees consent, I would like to know something about their
identity (age; occupation; religion; gender; etc.), but they may remain
anonymous if you or they prefer.
The interviews should be TYPED and posted on Canvas under the discussion prompt.
Students should cut/paste one set of questions and put the 3 different responses under each
question, identifying the responses with Interviewee #1; Interviewee #2; Interviewee #3.
Students will also include a 250-word paragraph discussing the process, describing the
interviewees while maintaining their anonymity, the responses received, and their “take aways,”
aha moments, concerns, etc. This post (3 interview responses and the 250-word paragraph)
is due on Canvas: Monday, October 15 by 7pm.
Students will then read and substantively respond to two of their colleagues’ posts.
Responses to colleagues due: Monday, October 22 by 7pm.
The purpose of this exercise is to expand the student’s appreciation for alternative ways of
imagining Jesus.
Interview Questions
Imagine that you must describe the significance of Jesus to someone who knows nothing
about him. You must do this in five words or fewer. How would you describe the
significance of Jesus?
What was Jesus’ physical appearance? Be as specific as possible. Describe his height,
weight, hair color, body build, skin tone, eye color, clothing, facial features, etc.
Smith, SC-540 p.6
What experiences have influenced you in how you imagine Jesus’ physical appearance?
Be specific. Have TV, film, paintings, etc. been influential? Historical knowledge or
reading the Bible?
What was Jesus like as a person? What was his character, his personality like? Again, be
as specific as possible, seeking to clearly define his nature as a person. (You may wish to
think of descriptors like: cheerful, calm, quick-tempered, sulky, troubled, serious,
humorous, a loner, a social person, etc.)
For people who lived at the time of Jesus and encountered him, or heard of him, what
were some of the common reactions?
If you had lived during Jesus’ lifetime, how do you think you would have reacted to him?
What are some of the ways in which people today react to and/or think about Jesus?
What sources have been most important in shaping your views about who Jesus was and
what he did? (For example: family, church, Bible, historical novels, films, etc. Please
name specific people, films, and books.)
If you have seen it, what was your reaction to Mel Gibson’s The Passion? Why?
How has your understanding of Jesus developed or changed over time?
If you had one question to ask Jesus, what would it be?
o John Barton, “Strategies for Reading Scripture,” in The Harper Collins Study
Bible, pp. xxxix-xliii.
- Why All the Hoopla about Gospels? (Strauss, Four Portraits, pp. 23-42)
- The Quest for the Historical Jesus and Whose Jesus Is Found?
Student Presentation: “Jesus and the Jerusalem Temple in the Gospel of Mark”
o Re-read Matthew 15
o Leticia A. Guardiola-Sáenz, “Borderless Women and Borderless Texts: A
Cultural Reading of Matthew 15:21-28.” Semeia, no 78 (1997) 69-81.
o Gail R. O’Day, “Surprised by Faith: Jesus and the Canaanite Woman,” in A
Feminist Companion to Matthew, ed. Amy-Jill Levine with Marianne Blickenstaff
(Cleveland, OH: The Pilgrim Press, 2001), pp. 114-125.
o Re-read all Lukan passages concerning women (esp. Luke 7:36-50 and 10:38-42).
o Jane D. Schaberg and Sharon H. Ringe, “Luke,” Women’s Bible Commentary, pp.
493-511.
o Teresa J. Hornsby, “The Woman is a Sinner/The Sinner is a Woman,” in A
Feminist Companion to Luke, ed. Amy-Jill Levine with Marianne Blickenstaff
(Cleveland, OH: The Pilgrim Press, 2001), pp. 121-132.
Students will read the above texts and write a 350-word post critically engaging Hornsby’s
article. Responses will include the following: What is her main argument? How does she support
it? Do you agree or disagree? Why? What are the implications Hornsby’s interpretation? How do
you think Schaberg and Ringe would respond to Hornsby’s article?
A late posting, a missed posting, or a posting that is insufficient in critical engagement with the
above questions will equate an unexcused absence.
- “The Good Samaritan,” and the Parables of “the Lost and the Found”
o Re-read all the relevant synoptic passages pertaining to the Infancy Narratives
(e.g. Matthew 1:1-2:23 and Luke 1:5-2:52) and the Miracles of Jesus.
o Re-read all the relevant synoptic passages pertaining to the Death of Jesus, Empty
Tomb, and Resurrection Narratives
Each student will be given the opportunity to present to the class their findings on the
similarities, differences, and the significance thereof, between the synoptic passages. As students
will not know which passage they will be asked to explicate, they are encouraged to be prepared
to discuss them all.
In today’s class the students will use a different part of their brains to engage the Synoptic
Gospels – through film! We will watch (no, no, no….You’ll have to wait and see…) for the first
part of class, and then discuss it in the second half of class. This will include exercises such as
deconstructing the movie into its various parts and determining from which gospel it originates,
and highlighting the ways in which Hollywood “beefs up” certain parts of the gospel for
audience appeal.
Week 13 - Monday, December 17: Final Reflection Paper Presentations & Course
Conclusion
Week 14 – We did it already! The Jesus interviews online assignment was our missing class!