Elastic Critical Plate Buckling Stress: Benchmark Example No. 34
Elastic Critical Plate Buckling Stress: Benchmark Example No. 34
Elastic Critical Plate Buckling Stress: Benchmark Example No. 34
34
SOFiSTiK | 2020
VERiFiCATiON
DCE-EN34 Elastic Critical Plate Buckling Stress
SOFiSTiK AG
This manual is protected by copyright laws. No part of it may be translated, copied or reproduced, in any form or by
any means, without written permission from SOFiSTiK AG. SOFiSTiK reserves the right to modify or to release
new editions of this manual.
The manual and the program have been thoroughly checked for errors. However, SOFiSTiK does not claim that
either one is completely error free. Errors and omissions are corrected as soon as they are detected.
The user of the program is solely responsible for the applications. We strongly encourage the user to test the
correctness of all calculations at least by random sampling.
Front Cover
Project: Queensferry Crossing | Photo: Bastian Kratzke
Elastic Critical Plate Buckling Stress
Overview
1 Problem Description
The problem consists of a stiffened steel plate. Its dimensions and boundary conditions are given in
Figure 2.
The main goal of this benchmark is to verify and compare the SOFiSTiK results with the ECCS reference
example Beg et al. [1, Example 2.4-3].
• EBPlate (2007)
• EN 1993-1-5 rules
hs
σc
b1
ts
b b2 = b1
b3 = b1
a = 1800 mm, b = 1800 mm, b1 = 600 mm, hs = 100 mm, ts = 10 mm.
S 355, ƒy = 355 N/ mm2 , ϵ = 0.81
2 Reference Solution
This example is concerned with calculation of the elastic critical plate buckling stress. The content of
this problem is covered by following parts of EN 1993-1-1 [2] and EN 1993-1-5 [3]:
• Calculating the critical plate buckling stress (EN 1993-1-5 [3], Annex A.2)
To calculate the critical plate buckling stress the loading, σc = 1.0 N/ mm2 is used. The critical elastic
stress will be calculated by multiplying the minimum eigenvalue with the unity stress σc = 1.0.
σcr,p = αcr · σc
ϵ = 0.81 b1 = 600 mm
hs = 100 mm
ts = 10 mm
t = 12 mm
1.0923
1.0798
1.0731
1.02 1.02 1.02 1.03
93
1.0664
0.9
1.0598
1.0531
1.0465
1.0398
1.0331
1.0265
1.0198 4
1.0131 1.0
1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01
1.0065 1.07 1.01 1.07
0.9998 1.01
0.9931 1.08 1.08
0.9865
0.9798
0.9731
0.9665 0.991
1.06
0.9598 1.06 0.991
0.9465
0.9398
0.9331
0.9265 1.08 1.08
0.9198 1.01
0.9131 1.08 1.09
0.9065 1.01
04
1.
0.8998
0.8932
0.8865
0.8798
0.8732
0.8665
0.8598 1.01
0.8532
0.8465 1.03 0.993 1.03
0.8398
0.8332
0.8265
0.8257
Figure 3: SOFiSTiK FEM Model - Stress distribution along the plate for σc = 1.0 N/ mm2
Table 2: Results
N
σcr 275.775 274.170 268.721 2682 290
mm2
1 EBPlate, V2.01
2 The results were overtaken from the ECCs reference example Beg et al. [1, Example 2.4-3]
4 Design Process
Design with respect to EN 1993-1-5:2006 [3]: 3
4.1 Klöppel
σcr,p is given with the following equation:
σcr,p = kσ,p · σE
Where:
π2 · E · t2
σE =
12 · (1 − ν 2 ) · b2
π 2 · 210000 · 122
σE = = 8.436 N/ mm2
12 · (1 − 0.32 ) · 18002
kσ,p is the elastic critical plate buckling coefficient according to Klöppel.
1800
α= = = 1.0
b 1800
As bs · t 100 · 10
δ= = = = 0.05
b·t b·t 1800 · 12
(s + As · e2 ) · 12 · (1 − ν 2 )
γ=
b · t3
ts
b3s · + bs · ts · e2 · 12 · (1 − ν 2 )
12
γ=
b · t3
10
1003 + 100 · 10 · 502 · 12 · 1 − 0.32
·
12
γ= = 11.70
1800 · 123
Note that parameter α and δ above are not the same as in EN 1993-1-
5, Annex A.1, where the procedure for plates stiffened with more than
two stiffeners is given.
kσ = 32.5
4.2 EBPlate
The usual procedure (calculation of buckling modes) for the calculation
of critical stresses is presented by using EBPlate.
3 The sections mentioned in the margins refer to EN 1993-1-5:2006 [3] unless other-
wise specified.
36
σ1 100
γ, δ b/ 3
30 15
γ, δ b/ 3 80
b/ 3
10 ψ · σ1 = σ1 = · b 60
50
20 6 40 30
kσ 25 20
4 15
10
10 2 6
24
1 1
0 0
0
0.7 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 3.8
α
b1 b2
As,1
s,1
b
b2 b3
As,2
s,2
b
Amped,1
mped,2
bmped,1 bmped,2
bmped
Stiffeners I and II
b1 / 2 ts b2 / 2
e2
e1
bs
Figure 7
595 + 590
As,1 = + 10 · 12 + 100 · 10 = 8230 mm2
2
b3s · ts (b1 + b2 ) · 0.5 + ts,1 · t 3
s,1 = + + bs · ts · e21 +
12 12
(b1 + b2 ) · 0.5 + ts,1 · t · e22
c = 2998 mm
π 2 · E · s,1
σcr,s =
As,1 · 2
E · t 3 · b · 2
+
4 · π 2 · (1 − ν 2 ) · As,1 · b21 · b22
In case of a stress gradient over the plate width, the critical plate buck-
ling stress should be properly interpolated from the position of the stiff-
ener to the most stressed edge of the plate. In this case no stress gra-
dient over the depth of the plate is present. Therefore, the critical plate
buckling stress is equal to the critical stress calculated for the buckling
of the stiffener on the elastic support:
σcr,p = σcr,p
= σcr,s = 322 N/ mm2
Lumped stiffener
bmped,1 = bmped,2 = 900 mm, bmped = 1800 mm
mped = s
+ = 3.675 · 106 + 3.675 · 106 = 7.35 · 106 mm4
s
v
mped · b2mped,1 · b2mped,2
u
u
4
c = 4.33 ·
t
t 3 · bmped
v
6 2 2
4 7.35 · 10 · 900 · 900
u
c = 4.33 ·
t
123 · 1800
c = 4832 mm
π 2 · E · mped
σcr,mped =
Amped · 2
E · t 3 · bmped · 2
+
4 · π 2 · (1 − ν 2 ) · Amped · b2mped,1 · b2mped,2
Finally we have:
4.4 ABAQUS
The results from ABAQUS have be overtaken from the ECCS reference
example Beg et al. [1, Example 2.4-3], see Table 2 for more details.
5 Conclusion
The critical plate buckling stress was calculated by using:
• SOFiSTiK
• Klöppel diagrams
• EBPlate
• ABAQUS
• EN 1993-1-5 rules
The methods used in the calculation give very similar results. The advantage of SOFiSTiK compared to
Eurocode formulas and other tools (that are not using FEM) is that the stiffeners can be added customly.
The cases with variable height of plates can be analysed as well (haunches). In conclusion, it has been
shown that the SOFISTiK results are reproduced with excellent accuracy.
(a) 1st buckling mode: σcr,p = 275.775 N/ mm2 (b) 2nd buckling mode: σcr,p = 324.22 N/ mm2
6 Literature
[1] D. Beg et al. Design of plated structures. Ernst & Sohn and ECCS, 2010.
[2] EN 1993-1-1: Eurocode 3: Design of concrete structures, Part 1-1: General rules and rules for
buildings. CEN. 2005.
[3] EN 1993-1-5: Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures, Part 1-5: Plated structural elements. CEN.
2006.