Computer-Based Analysis of Electric Stress: Ansys Maxwell 2D
Computer-Based Analysis of Electric Stress: Ansys Maxwell 2D
Computer-Based Analysis of Electric Stress: Ansys Maxwell 2D
EXPERIMENT 5
COMPUTER-BASED ANALYSIS OF ELECTRIC STRESS
1. INTRODUCTION
Insulating materials used in power system equipment are subjected to severe electric stress.
Breakdown will occur if the stress exceeds the material breakdown strength. Knowledge of
the electric field distribution in a given insulating structure is important as it enables
determination of the permissible operating voltage and methods of controlling electric stress.
This knowledge can be achieved using computer-based numerical methods such as the Finite
Element Method (FEM) to solve the Laplace’s or Poisson’s field equations. Note that
practical insulating systems usually involve a combination of different insulating materials
with different permittivity and also require solving three-dimensional fields with complex
boundary conditions.
2. EXPERIMENT
This experiment involves the use of computer programs. There are many commercial
software programs for field analysis. One such product is the Ansys Maxwell 2D for two-
dimensional field analysis (www.ansys.com). The workflow process to solve a field problem
involves six steps: create a structure → assign materials → add boundaries → add excitations
→ set up the solution → solve → post processing.
(a) Draw, set up, and solve for the electrostatic field in between two parallel copper plates
(1 mm thickness, 15 mm length) at 5 mm apart with an applied voltage of 1 kV. Verify
that the electric field is uniform.
air
15cm
10kV
0V
Figure 1
Note: The thickness of the above electrodes is 1cm.
(c) A cable, shown in Figure 2, has an eccentric core and axial uniformity. There are 100
kilo-volts across the cable and the insulation has a relative permittivity r = 2.0 and
resistivity = 1013 m. The diameter of cable core and cable are 10 mm and 100 mm,
respectively. The center of cable core is 25 mm away from the center of cable.
▪ Obtain the field plot for this cable using Maxwell 2D.
▪ Determine the stress and voltage at points P1 and P2. Compare simulation results
with those obtained using manual field mapping (see Appendix).
▪ Identify the region of highest stress and determine its value.
▪ Calculate the cable capacitance and insulation resistance (per unit length).
▪ Explain why the lower half plot (in Fig.2) is incorrect.
▪ If this cable is concentric, redo the field plot and determine the highest stress. This
case can also be solved analytically and the electric field at a radius r is given by:
V
E (r ) = V/m
r ln ( b a )
where b is the outer radius, a is the inner radius, and V is the total voltage across the
insulation. Compare the results. Also, compare against that of the eccentric core.
Note: inner circle (cable core) should be subtracted in order to achieve accurate result.
(d) In many high voltage insulation systems multi-dielectric structures are used with
dielectric materials with different relative permittivity in order to provide better use of
insulation by reducing the overall insulation thickness and making the field more
uniform within the overall layer structure. In other cases, the use of multi-dielectric
structures is unavoidable such as in a HV bushing where the small gap between the
porcelain insulator and the inner HV conductor is normally filled with insulating oil.
Consider the 11 kV model bushing as specified in Experiment 3 with the applied
voltage of 20 kV.
3. REFERENCES
1. E. Kuffel, W.S. Zaengl, and J. Kuffel, High Voltage Engineering: Fundamentals, 2nd
ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000.
2. Ansoft Corporation, Getting Started: A 2D Electrostatic Problem, Maxwell 2D
Student Version, 2002.
To solve a field problem, we need to obtain the flux or potential distribution. From this, we
can obtain the required macroscopic and microscopic properties
e.g. R, C, L , J , D , B , E , etc
Field mapping
This technique uses known field properties to draw up a map of the field for a particular
configuration. It can give surprisingly accurate results.
Field properties:
(i) Flux lines and equi-potentials are orthogonal
(ii) Surfaces of flux sources are equi-potentials
(iii) Flux lines intersect sources and sinks orthogonally.
The aim is to divide the field structure into curvilinear squares (assuming there is symmetry in
the third dimension)
If the element is part of current flow and the current density is J , and electric field E
I = J area = J ( x ) = J x ( =1 m )
V = E y
This holds for any field, the only difference being the property relative to the field type, e.g.
▪ For an electric field, capacitance of the unit square =
▪ For a magnetic field, the unit square inductance =
▪ For a thermal field, the unit square conductance = k
e.g. for a current flow field above, if there are n equipotential drops and m flux tubes of
current and the resistivity is , then the total R is:
n
R= ohms
m
4
In the above: n = 4, m = 8 R = = ohms (per m)
8 2
If a capacitance:
= Q and total Q = mQ = 8Q
= V and total V = nV = 4V
Hence:
Q 8 Q
Total C = = = 2 (F/m)
V 4 V
For flux density and potential gradient, use the appropriate single square and the applicable
scale factor of the map:
Flux density =
1 x
m
= =
x x
n
Pot. grad = =
y y
Thus if we know total and and get m and n, and x ( =y ) from the map, we can find
x and y .
__________________________